Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2018 Aug 30;9:3578. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05310-5

Addendum: Genome-wide association study of depression phenotypes in UK Biobank identifies variants in excitatory synaptic pathways

David M Howard 1,, Mark J Adams 1, Masoud Shirali 1, Toni-Kim Clarke 1, Riccardo E Marioni 2, Gail Davies 2,3, Jonathan R I Coleman 4,5, Clara Alloza 1, Xueyi Shen 1, Miruna C Barbu 1, Eleanor M Wigmore 1, Jude Gibson 1, Saskia P Hagenaars 4,5, Cathryn M Lewis 4,5, Joey Ward 6, Daniel J Smith 6, Patrick F Sullivan 7,8,9, Chris S Haley 10, Gerome Breen 4,5, Ian J Deary 2,3, Andrew M McIntosh 1,3
PMCID: PMC6117285  PMID: 30166530

Addendum to: Nature Communications; 10.1038/s41467-018-03819-3; published online 16 Apr 2018

In this article, a meta-analysis of the significant variants in the UK Biobank sample with a previously published study by 23andMe was included. Due to the individual study results being reported on different scales, the meta-analytic point estimates were not reliable. We have re-analysed the 17 significant variants in the UK Biobank using a comparable approach to 23andMe in Plink. We present an updated version of Table 1 associated with this Addendum that includes the newly calculated comparable effect size estimates for UK Biobank, the updated meta-analysis results and we have extended the table legend to provide information on the updated columns. As a consequence of the new analysis, the original statement in the first paragraph under the subheading “Genome-wide association study of depression” reading “All 17 variants remained significant (P < 5 × 10−8) in the meta-analysis” should be amended to “10 variants remained significant (P < 5 × 10−8) in the meta-analysis”. There was no change to the direction of allelic effect in either cohort.

Table 1.

Independent variants with a genome-wide significant (P < 5 × 108) association with broad depression, probable major depressive disorder (MDD), or International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-coded MDD in the UK Biobank

UK Biobank 23andMe Meta-analysis
Phenotype Chr Marker name Position A1/A2 Freq Info log OR (St Err) P -value Gene ± 10kb log OR (St Err) P -value log OR (St Err) P -value Direction
Broad depression 1 rs10127497 67050144 T/A 0.138 1.00 0.044 (0.0077) 1.26 × 10−8 SGIP1 0.0098 (0.0086) 0.257 0.029 (0.0058) 5.70 × 107 ++
1 rs6699744 72825144 T/A 0.612 1.00 0.040 (0.0055) 1.64 × 1013 0.0328 (0.0064) 2.68 × 107 0.0372 (0.0042) 9.76 × 1019 ++
1 rs6424532 73664022 A/G 0.486 1.00 0.029 (0.0053) 3.74 × 108 0.0233 (0.006) 1.14 × 104 0.0267 (0.004) 4.10 × 1011 ++
1 rs7548151 177026983 A/G 0.084 1.00 0.056 (0.0095) 3.77 × 109 ASTN1 0.006 (0.0104) 0.560 0.0339 (0.0071) 1.97 × 106 ++
5 rs40465 103981726 G/T 0.332 1.00 0.035 (0.0056) 4.37 × 10−10 RP11-6N13.1 0.0193 (0.0064) 2.63 × 103 0.0285 (0.0043) 3.53 × 1011 ++
6 rs3132685 29945949 A/G 0.130 1.00 −0.059 (0.0081) 2.48 × 1013 −0.0249 (0.0099) 0.0115 −0.0459 (0.0063) 4.87 × 1013 −−
6 rs112348907 73587953 G/A 0.296 1.00 0.033 (0.0058) 1.44 × 108 −0.0004 (0.0067) 0.950 0.019 (0.0045) 2.06 × 105 +−
7 rs3807865 12250402 A/G 0.412 1.00 0.037 (0.0054) 6.81 × 1012 TMEM106B 0.019 (0.0061) 0.002 0.0293 (0.0041) 8.79 × 1013 ++
7 rs2402273 117600424 C/T 0.409 1.00 0.032 (0.0054) 1.88 × 109 0.0093 (0.0061) 0.130 0.0226 (0.0041) 3.97 × 108 ++
9 rs263575 17033840 A/G 0.460 1.00 −0.030 (0.0053) 2.36 × 108 −0.0157 (0.0061) 9.45 × 103 −0.0238 (0.0041) 4.51 × 109 −−
10 rs1021363 106610839 G/A 0.642 1.00 −0.032 (0.0055) 1.02 × 108 SORCS3 −0.031 (0.0063) 9.34 × 107 −0.0314 (0.0042) 1.04 × 1013 −−
11 rs10501696 88748162 G/A 0.499 0.99 −0.036 (0.0054) 6.42 × 1011 GRM5 −0.0251 (0.0066) 1.49 × 104 −0.0315 (0.0043) 1.55 × 1013 −−
13 rs9530139 31847324 T/C 0.195 1.00 −0.040 (0.0067) 2.59 × 109 B3GLCT −0.0075 (0.0078) 0.338 −0.0265 (0.0052) 2.77 × 107 −−
15 rs28541419 88945878 G/C 0.231 1.00 −0.035 (0.0064) 2.82 × 108 −0.0029 (0.0073) 0.688 −0.0218 (0.0049) 7.75 × 106 −−
Probable MDD 2 rs10929355 15398964 G/T 0.456 1.00 −0.053 (0.0090) 5.89 × 109 NBAS −0.0078 (0.0061) 0.199 −0.0221 (0.0051) 1.62 × 105 −−
7 rs5011432 12268668 C/A 0.412 1.00 0.051 (0.0091) 2.10 × 108 TMEM106B 0.022 (0.0061) 3.15 × 104 0.0313 (0.0052) 1.47 × 109 ++
ICD-coded MDD 7 rs1554505 1983929 A/G 0.752 1.00 0.114 (0.0191) 2.73 × 109 MAD1L1 0.017 (0.007) 0.015 0.0291 (0.0068) 1.63 × 105 ++

The UK Biobank results are from logistic regression analyses in PLINK of variants identified as genome-wide significant using BGENIE. Variants were examined within the 23andMe association analysis of depression4 to obtain their reported P-values and determine whether their effect was in the same direction as UK Biobank. The allele frequency (Freq) is for the A1 allele within UK Biobank, with the effect size (Log OR) and standard error (St. err.) reported for the A1 allele within UK Biobank, 23andMe and the meta-analysis. The chromosome (Chr) and basepair position is given for the GRCh37 assembly. Imputation accuracy (Info) score of UK Biobank was calculated based on the sample analysed

The fourth sentence in Methods section under the subheading “Replication cohort and meta-analysis” on page 8 was incomplete and should read “Additionally, we used Metal36 to conduct an inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis, using LD score regression intercepts13 for genomic inflation control.”, adding “using LD score regression intercepts13 for genomic inflation control” at the end of the sentence.

We have also included transformed effect sizes and standard errors in our summary statistics deposited on the Edinburgh DataShare website and have updated the doi to 10.7488/ds/2350.

In a second related issue, we used the new BGENIE software package to generate the results with which to conduct gene, region and gene-set analyses to generate data presented in the “Gene and region-based analysis” and “Gene-set pathway analysis” sections, Table 2, Supplementary Table 6, Supplementary Data 612, and Supplementary Figures 79. BGENIE reported minor allele frequencies (MAF) across the whole of UK Biobank (n = 487,409) rather than based on those individuals that were included in each of the association analyses (broad depression n = 322,580; probable major depressive disorder n = 174,519; International Classification of Diseases-coded major depressive disorder n = 217,584). Therefore the results reported in the “Gene and region-based analysis” and “Gene-set pathway analysis” were based on the MAF across the whole of UK Biobank as opposed to what we described in the methods section. To correct these errors in our initial analysis, we have now re-analysed the data using the MAF based on only those individuals included in the respective association analysis. This has resulted in 73 rather than 78 significant genes for broad depression, three rather than two genes for probable MDD, and zero genes rather than one gene for ICD-coded MDD which was originally described in the “Gene and region-based analysis” section in the results. The gene-based results descri bed on page 3 under the subheading “Gene and region-based analyses” should read “We used the MAGMA18 package to identify genes with a significant effect (P < 2.77 × 10−6) on each phenotype. There were 73 genes significantly associated with broad depression (Supplementary Data 6, associated with this Addendum), and three genes that were associated with probable MDD (Supplementary Data 7, associated with this Addendum)”. Updated versions of Supplementary Note 1, Supplementary Figures 7, 8, and 9 in the Supplementary Information file, and Supplementary Data 6 and 7 are included here to reflect these changes in the data. The original Supplementary Data 8 should be disregarded as with the new analysis no genome-wide significant SNPs for ICD-coded MDD are detected. In the region-based analysis described on page 3 number of regions assessed increased from 8308 to 8345 requiring a slight change in the significance threshold from 6.02 × 10−8 to 5.99 × 10−6 so that the sentence in the second paragraph under the subheading “Gene and region-based analyses” now reads “We also used MAGMA to identify genomic regions, defined by recombination hotspots, with a statistically significant effect (P < 5.99 × 10−6) on each phenotype”. The number of significant regions remained the same and updated estimates of effect sizes of regions may be found in the updated Supplementary Data 8, 10, and 11 associated with this Addendum. The significant gene-sets described under the subheading “Gene-set pathway analysis” remained the same with slight differences in number of genes in each pathway, effect sizes and p-values. The first sentence in this section now reads: “We conducted gene-set enrichment analysis19,20 and identified five significant pathways for broad depression after applying correction for multiple testing; GO_EXCITATORY_SYNAPSE (beta = 0.342 ± 0.069, Pcorrected = 0.003), GO_MECHANOSENSORY_BEHAVIOR (beta = 1.270 ± 0.294, Pcorrected = 0.047), GO_POSTSYNAPSE (beta = 0.248 ± 0.050, Pcorrected = 0.003), GO_NEURON_SPINE (beta = 0.390 ± 0.089, Pcorrected = 0.019) and GO_DENDRITE (beta = 0.200 ± 0.044, Pcorrected = 0.021) (Table 2)”. Amended versions of Table 2, Supplementary Data 12 and Supplementary Table 6 in the Supplementary Information file are included in this Addendum.

Table 2.

Pathways with a significant effect (Pcorrected < 0.05) on broad depression following multiple testing correction identified through gene-set enrichment analysis

Phenotype Pathway Number of genes Beta (St. Err.) P -value P Corrected
Broad depression GO_EXCITATORY_SYNAPSE 184 0.342 (0.069) 3.45 × 107 0.003
GO_POSTSYNAPSE 354 0.248 (0.050) 3.88 × 107 0.003
GO_NEURON_SPINE 115 0.390 (0.089) 2.72 × 106 0.019
GO_DENDRITE 425 0.200 (0.044) 3.08 × 106 0.021
GO_MECHANOSENSORY_BEHAVIOR 12 1.270 (0.294) 8.04 × 106 0.047

The described errors have not been fixed in the original article. We reaffirm that the changes do not change the main conclusions of the manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

41467_2018_5310_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (993.5KB, pdf)

UKBiobank GWAS of Depression Supplementary Info

SupplementaryData6 (18.3KB, xlsx)
SupplementaryData7 (9.7KB, xlsx)
SupplementaryData9 (19.4KB, xlsx)
SupplementaryData10 (10KB, xlsx)
SupplementaryData11 (10.1KB, xlsx)
SupplementaryData12 (48.5KB, xlsx)

Footnotes

*A full list of consortium members appears at the end of the paper.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-05310-5.

References

  • 4.Hyde CL, et al. Identification of 15 genetic loci associated with risk of major depression in individuals of European descent. Nat. Genet. 2016;48:1031–1036. doi: 10.1038/ng.3623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bulik-Sullivan KB, et al. LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 2015;47:291–295. doi: 10.1038/ng.3211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Middeldorp CM, et al. A genome-wide association meta-analysis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in population-based paediatric cohorts. J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry. 2016;55:896–905. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.05.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.de Leeuw CA, et al. Mooij, J. M., Heskes, T. & Posthuma, D. MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS. Comput. Biol. 2015;11:e1004219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.The Gene Ontology Consortium. Expansion of the gene ontology knowledgebase and resources. Nucleic Acids Res.45, D331–D338 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Hersch-Green EI, Turley NE, Subramanian A, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:15545–15550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Willer, C. J., Li, Y. & Abecasis, G. R. METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans. Bioinformatics. 26, 2190–2191 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

41467_2018_5310_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (993.5KB, pdf)

UKBiobank GWAS of Depression Supplementary Info

SupplementaryData6 (18.3KB, xlsx)
SupplementaryData7 (9.7KB, xlsx)
SupplementaryData9 (19.4KB, xlsx)
SupplementaryData10 (10KB, xlsx)
SupplementaryData11 (10.1KB, xlsx)
SupplementaryData12 (48.5KB, xlsx)

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES