Abstract
An Arabidopsis thaliana chlorophyll(ide) a oxygenase gene (cao), which is responsible for chlorophyll b synthesis from chlorophyll a, was introduced and expressed in a photosystem I-less strain of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. In this strain, most chlorophyll is associated with the photosystem II complex. In line with observations by Satoh et al. [Satoh, S., Ikeuchi, M., Mimuro, M. & Tanaka, A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 4293–4297], chlorophyll b was made but accounted for less than 10% of total chlorophyll. However, when lhcb encoding light-harvesting complex (LHC)II from pea was present in the same strain (lhcb+/cao+), chlorophyll b accumulated in the cell to levels exceeding those of chlorophyll a, although LHCII did not accumulate. In the lhcb+/cao+ strain, the total amount of chlorophyll, the number of chlorophylls per photosystem II center, and the oxygen-evolving activity on a per-chlorophyll basis were similar to those in the photosystem I-less strain. Furthermore, the chlorophyll a/b ratio of photosystem II core particles (retaining CP47 and CP43) and of whole cells of the lhcb+/cao+ strain was essentially identical, and PS II activity could be obtained efficiently by chlorophyll b excitation. These data indicate that chlorophyll b functionally substitutes for chlorophyll a in photosystem II. Therefore, the availability of chlorophylls, rather than their binding specificity, may determine which chlorophyll is incorporated at many positions of photosystem II. We propose that the transient presence of a LHCII/chlorophyll(ide) a oxygenase complex in the lhcb+/cao+ strain leads to a high abundance of available chlorophyll b that is subsequently incorporated into photosystem II complexes. The apparent LHCII requirement for high chlorophyll(ide) a oxygenase activity may be instrumental to limit the occurrence of chlorophyll b in plants to LHC proteins.
Oxygenic photosynthetic organisms contain chlorophyll a and other (accessory) pigments to harvest light energy. Higher plants, many algae, and prochlorophytes contain chlorophyll b as one of the accessory pigments in light-harvesting chlorophyll complexes (LHCs), and in these organisms, the chlorophyll a/b ratio generally is 2–4. The two chlorophylls differ only at position 3 (ring B): chlorophyll a contains a methyl group at this position, whereas chlorophyll b contains an aldehyde group (1). The gene encoding chlorophyll(ide) a oxygenase (CAO) that catalyzes conversion of the methyl to the aldehyde group has been cloned (2–4); the natural substrate of CAO is as yet unknown, as recombinant CAO produced in Escherichia coli catalyzed the formation of chlorophyllide b from chlorophyllide a (5) but did so at a very low rate. Overexpressed CAO in vitro did not catalyze a clear conversion of chlorophyll a to b (5), but this may be related to very limited chlorophyll a solubility in aqueous media. No CAO is found in cyanobacteria, and therefore they are unable to synthesize chlorophyll b. Cyanobacteria do not possess LHC and instead contain phycobilisomes as the peripheral light-harvesting apparatus.
In plants, LHC stability and chlorophyll b synthesis appear to be mutually correlated. Chlorophyll b synthesis requires the presence of LHC apoproteins in the thylakoid (6), and chlorophyll b-less strains of barley (7), rice (8), and Arabidopsis (9) have very low levels of LHCII [LHC associated with photosystem (PS) II]. Even though it is clear that chlorophyll b binding is required for LHCII stability (10, 11), the mechanism for the dependence of chlorophyll b synthesis on the presence of LHC has remained unexplained.
The wild type of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 lacks the capability to synthesize either LHC or chlorophyll b. However, the corresponding higher-plant genes can be introduced into this cyanobacterium. On introduction of the cao gene, a Synechocystis strain has been generated that converted a small percentage of chlorophyll a to chlorophyll b (the chlorophyll a/b ratio was about 15, depending on the growth stage) (12). Another strain was created into which a pea lhcb gene (coding for a LHCII polypeptide) was introduced, and even though LHCII was synthesized, it was not stable in the membrane (13). This strain lacked PS I because of a psaAB deletion and made chlorophyll only in light because of a lack of chlL (13). This strain, as well as the PS I-less/chlL− parental strain (14) contained little chlorophyll, as most chlorophyll in cyanobacteria is associated with PS I (15).
Here we show that in the transient presence of LHCII (but not in its absence), introduction of cao into Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 causes chlorophyll b to become the major pigment that functionally replaces chlorophyll a from many binding sites in the PS II complex. This result indicates a lack of specificity of pigment binding in PS II complexes and highlights the important role LHC appears to play in CAO activity in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Strains and Growth Conditions.
PS I-less Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 strains were cultivated at 30°C in BG-11 medium (16) buffered with 5 mM N-tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl-2-aminoethane sulfonic acid-NaOH (pH 8.2) and supplemented with 5 mM glucose. The light intensity was 0.5 μmol of photons m−2⋅s−1.
Introduction of the cao Gene into the Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 Genome.
The cao gene (starting from codon 57, essentially corresponding to the coding region for the mature protein) was PCR-amplified from the Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA clone 103D24T7 [GenBank accession no. T22255 (17)] with primers creating a BspHI site and an AUG codon at the 5′ end of the region of the gene corresponding to the mature protein, and a SalI site directly downstream of the stop codon. Moreover, a 0.75-kb region directly upstream of and including the psaA translation start site was PCR-amplified by using genomic Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 DNA, introducing restriction sites for EcoRI (0.75 kb upstream of psaA) and NcoI (at the psaA translation start site). These PCR fragments were cloned together in pUC18, yielding a construct with the upstream psaA region and the part of the cao gene coding for the mature protein, linked together in-frame at the psaA translation start site. At the 3′ end of cao, a PstI/PstI fragment from pUC4K carrying the kanamycin-resistance cassette was inserted, and downstream of the cassette, a 0.6-kb sequence identical to that immediately downstream of psaB, but with introduced SphI and NarI sites, was inserted. The resulting plasmid was used to transform the PS I-less/chlL−/lhcb+ (13) and PS I-less/chlL− (14) strains of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, placing cao under control of the psaAB promoter.
Pigment Analysis.
Pigments were extracted from Synechocystis cells with methanol, and the methanol extract was subjected to HPLC analysis. A 15-min gradient of ethyl acetate (0–100%) in acetonitrile–water–triethylamine (9:1:0.01, vol/vol/vol) at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min was used to elute the HPLC column. For a preliminary estimation of the chlorophyll a/b ratio, concentrations of chlorophyll a and b in the methanol extract were determined spectrophotometrically according to ref. 18.
Mass Spectroscopy.
Chlorophyll b was collected after HPLC analysis. Solvents were evaporated under nitrogen, and dry chlorophyll b was stored at −20°C in the dark. Mass spectra were obtained by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Before analysis, 10 μg of chlorophyll b was mixed with terthiophene (used as a matrix) dissolved in acetone.
Isolation of PS II Core Particles.
Thylakoid membranes (13) were washed with 20 mM sodium pyrophosphate dissolved in 50 mM Mes–NaOH (pH 6.4) buffer. The pellet of washed membranes was resuspended in thylakoid buffer [20 mM Mes–NaOH, pH 6.4/5 mM MgCl2/5 mM CaCl2/20% glycerol (vol/vol)/1 mM benzamidine] to a final chlorophyll concentration of ≈0.1 mg/ml. Dodecyl maltoside was added to a concentration of 0.4% (wt/vol), and the mixture was incubated in the dark for 40 min at 4°C. The sample was centrifuged in the microfuge for 3 min, and the solubilized material was loaded on a sucrose gradient [50 mM Mes–NaOH, pH 6.4/10–30% (wt/vol) sucrose/5 mM MgCl2/5 mM CaCl2/10 mM NaCl/0.04% (wt/vol) dodecyl maltoside] and centrifuged overnight at 35,000 rpm and 4°C in a Beckman SW41 rotor. The most intense green band was recovered and subjected to anion-exchange chromatography (19). The resulting PS II core particles retained the PS II core antenna proteins CP43 and CP47.
SDS-Urea/PAGE.
SDS-urea/PAGE was performed by using a continuous 16–22% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gradient gel containing 6.5 M urea, as described (20).
[35S] Protein Labeling and Chase.
For pulse–chase experiments, 50 ml of Synechocystis cells was incubated in [35S] protein-labeling mix (EXPRE35S 35S, containing 73% l-[35S]methionine and 22% l-[35S]cysteine, 11 mCi/ml) (DuPont/NEN) at a final concentration of 1 μCi/ml for 10 min. The radioactivity was chased by addition of 100 μM unlabeled methionine and cysteine. Cells were harvested 0, 10, and 30 min after the start of the chase, rapidly chilled, and thylakoids were prepared (13). Thylakoid proteins were separated by SDS-urea/PAGE. Labeled protein bands were detected by autoradiography by using a Storm PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics), and the integrated intensity of radiolabeled LHCII was determined by imagequant software (Molecular Dynamics).
Herbicide Binding.
14C-3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU)-binding analysis was carried out to quantify the amount of PS II in the cells, as described (15).
Fluorescence Induction.
Fluorescence induction was measured in the presence of 5 μM DCMU by using a FluoroLog (Spex Industries, Metuchen, NJ) spectrophotometer equipped with a manually triggered UNIBLITZ-26L2A0T5 electronic shutter (3-ms opening time). The emission wavelength was set at 680 nm (the bandwidth at half maximum was 8 nm). To correct for the difference in the intensity of the excitation beam at the two wavelengths, the excitation bandwidths at half maximum were 1.00 and 0.85 nm at 436 and 462 nm, respectively.
Low-Temperature Fluorescence Emission Measurements.
Fluorescence emission spectra (77 and 15 K) were measured by using a Spex FluoroLog 2 instrument. Intact cells or isolated PS II particles (5 μg of chlorophyll/ml) were placed between two fused glass plates about 1.2 mm apart and cooled in a temperature-controlled cryostat (Air Products and Chemicals, Allentown, PA). The excitation and emission bandwidths were 4 and 1 nm, respectively.
Results
Introduction of the cao Gene.
An A. thaliana cao gene was introduced under the Synechocystis psaAB promoter and with the native psaA translation start site in two strains of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. One was the PS I-less/chlL− strain lacking psaAB (coding for the PS I reaction center proteins) and chlL (coding for a subunit of the light-independent protochlorophyllide reductase); this strain is referred to as the “parental strain” in this study. The other strain was the PS I-less/chlL−/lhcb+ strain (referred to as lhcb+), which carries the pea gene for the major LHCII subunit under the psbA3 promoter (13). The psbA3 gene is one of the genes coding for the D1 protein of PS II and is dispensable for PS II activity when psbA2 is present (21).
Chlorophyll a and b Levels.
When introducing cao into the parental (PS I-less/chlL−) strain, the resulting transformant, referred to as cao+, contained very little chlorophyll b relative to a (Table 1), in line with the findings of Satoh et al. (12). However, when cao was introduced together with lhcb, the chlorophyll b amount was increased by an order of magnitude at the expense of chlorophyll a, and the resulting strain (named cao+/lhcb+) contained more chlorophyll b than a (Table 1 and Fig. 1). To verify that the major increase in the chlorophyll b content in the cao+/lhcb+ strain vs. the cao+ stain indeed is caused by the presence of lhcb, the lhcb gene in the cao+/lhcb+ strain was replaced by the native psbA3 gene resulting in the cao+* strain. In this strain, the chlorophyll b content dropped by an order of magnitude to levels comparable to that in the cao+ strain (Table 1), confirming that the presence of lhcb was required to generate high chlorophyll b levels in the strain.
Table 1.
Strain | Parental | cao+ | lhcb+ | cao+/lhcb+ | cao+* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chlorophyll b (%) | 0 | 6 ± 1 | 0 | 59 ± 6 | 3 ± 2 |
Chlorophyll a and b contents were determined by comparing the respective peak areas in the HPLC profile with chlorophyll standards, monitoring absorbance at 440 nm.
This strain initially carried both cao and lhcb, but psbA3 was reintroduced in lieu of lhcb.
We verified that the major compound appearing in the cao+/lhcb+ strain was indeed chlorophyll b. As shown in Fig. 1B, the absorption spectrum corresponds to that of chlorophyll b. Furthermore, laser desorption mass spectrometry was carried out on HPLC-purified chlorophyll b from A. thaliana leaves and from the Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 cao+/lhcb+ strain (Fig. 2). The mass spectrum of the two isolates was essentially identical and showed two peaks at m/z 907.7 and 630.7, corresponding to chlorophyll b itself and to chlorophyll b that lost the phytyl chain during mass spectrometry (22).
A minor new peak occurring in the cao+/lhcb+ strain was assigned to pheophytin b on the basis of its mobility (Fig. 1A) and optical spectrum (Fig. 1C); its abundance was about 4% of that of total chlorophyll in the strain.
Chlorophyll b Replaces Chlorophyll a in PS II.
The next question to be addressed is: With which protein complex is chlorophyll b in the cao+/lhcb+ strain (which lacks PS I) associated? In the cao+/lhcb+ strain, the total amount of chlorophyll, the number of chlorophylls per PS II center, and the oxygen evolution rate of PS II were essentially indistinguishable from that in the parental strain (Table 2). These data suggest that chlorophyll b replaces most of the chlorophyll a. To verify that chlorophyll b indeed is part of the PS II core complex, PS II core particles were isolated from the parental and cao+/lhcb+ strains. The protein composition and absorption spectra of PS II core particles (i.e., PS II particles retaining the core antenna proteins CP43 and CP47) from the two strains are shown in Fig. 3. The SDS/PAGE protein patterns of PS II core particle preparations from the parental and cao+/lhcb+ strains were similar, whereas in the PS II core particle, preparation from the cao+/lhcb+ strain chlorophyll b made up about 60% of the total chlorophyll. This percentage is similar to that of intact cells from which the PS II core particles were isolated.
Table 2.
Strain | Chlorophyll, μg/ml/OD730 | Chlorophyll/ PS II ratio | O2 evolution rate (μmol O2/mg chlorophyll⋅h) |
---|---|---|---|
Parental | 0.81 ± 0.06 | 75 | 2,360 ± 100 |
cao+/lhcb+ | 0.90 ± 0.08 | 75 | 1,950 ± 150 |
Cells were grown photoheterotrophically to OD730 ∼ 0.5 for all assays. Chlorophyll is the sum of chlorophylls a and b. Chlorophyll/PS II ratios were determined by 14C-DCMU binding. The chlorophyll a/b ratio in cells of the cao+/lhcb+ strain used for these assays was 0.7 ± 0.2.
Fluorescence excitation and emission spectra (77 K) of the PS II core particles from the parental and cao+/lhcb+ strains are shown in Fig. 4. Excitation spectra show a significant contribution of chlorophyll b to 684-nm emission. The emission spectrum is essentially identical for the two strains, regardless of whether, in PS II core particles from the cao+/lhcb+ strain, chlorophyll a (at 436 nm) or chlorophyll b (at 462 nm) was excited preferentially, indicating efficient energy transfer from chlorophyll b to chlorophyll a. However, a small 650- to 660-nm fluorescence emission shoulder is present in particles from the cao+/lhcb+ strain; this shoulder may originate from chlorophyll b.
Presence of LHCII.
Interestingly, LHCII does not seem to contribute to chlorophyll b binding in the cao+/lhcb+ strain. According to Western blots, LHCII did not accumulate to significant levels in the cao+/lhcb+ strain (data not shown). Moreover, in chlorophyll b-rich PS II core particle preparations, no band corresponding to LHCII was observed (Fig. 3). On pulse labeling, the thylakoid protein pattern of cao+/lhcb+ cells (Fig. 5) was similar to that of the lhcb+ strain (12). However, the presence of cao and thereby the presence of chlorophyll b stabilized LHCII to some degree: the half-life of LHCII increased from about 10 min in the lhcb+ strain to ≈30 min in the cao+/lhcb+ strain; however, LHCII accumulation remained insufficient for immunodetection.
Functionality of Chlorophyll b in PS II.
To test whether light absorbed by chlorophyll b in PS II complexes is capable of driving PS II photochemistry, fluorescence induction curves were recorded by using intact cells of the parental and cao+/lhcb+ strains in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (Fig. 6). In the cao+/lhcb+ strain, fluorescence induction, which reflects the rate of QA reduction in PS II, occurred at a similar rate on excitation at 462 nm (absorbed mostly by chlorophyll b) versus when excited at 436 nm (absorbed mostly by chlorophyll a). However, in the control strain, 436 nm light was much more effective in exciting PS II than 462 nm light. These results indicate a large contribution of chlorophyll b to light harvesting for PS II in the cao+/lhcb+ strain.
As chlorophyll b appears to be part of the PS II antenna in the cao+/lhcb+ strain, 77 K fluorescence excitation and emission spectra were determined in intact cells. As shown in Fig. 7A, the parental strain contained characteristic 685- and 695-nm peaks representing antenna/PS II chlorophyll and a “low-energy” chlorophyll a presumably associated with His-114 of CP47 (23, 24), respectively, in intact cells. However, in the cao+/lhcb+ strain, the two peaks were merged to one with a maximum around 691 nm. Cooling of the sample to 15 K, which intensifies emission from the low-energy chlorophyll (25), did not lead to spectral shifts in the cao+/lhcb+ strain (Fig. 7B), indicating that in this strain, the 695-nm fluorescence emission band has shifted to the blue, and the low-energy chlorophyll a associated with His-114 of CP47 has disappeared and is now perhaps chlorophyll b. This His-114-ligated chlorophyll b no longer is a long-wavelength emitter, and excitation energy is expected to be transferred efficiently to nearby chlorophyll a molecules. The fluorescence emission spectrum of the cao+/lhcb+ strain was essentially identical when excited at 436 vs. 462 nm (not shown), indicative of an efficient energy exchange between chlorophylls b and a, supporting the data shown in Fig. 4B. This conclusion was further confirmed by the fluorescence excitation spectrum of intact cao+/lhcb+ cells, where chlorophylls a and b both contributed to 690-nm fluorescence emission at 77 K (data not shown).
Discussion
The results obtained indicate the functional presence of chlorophyll b at the majority of chlorophyll-binding sites in the cao+/lhcb+ PS II core complex, apparently replacing chlorophyll a. Consequently, most of the chlorophyll-binding sites in the PS II core complex are not specific for chlorophyll a and can functionally accommodate chlorophyll b if offered. The chlorophyll b level increased about 10-fold when lhcb was present (Table 1), even though LHCII was not stable (Fig. 4), and did not accumulate. In agreement with the results of Satoh et al. (12), very little chlorophyll b accumulated in Synechocystis strains containing cao but lacking lhcb. Therefore, LHCII appears to be needed for activation of CAO and/or for providing an initial binding niche for chlorophyll b. The requirement of LHCII for the high activity of CAD provides an explanation for the specific association of chlorophyll b with LHC in plants and for the requirement of LHC for chlorophyll b accumulation (6, 26). As LHCII is not stable in Synechocystis thylakoids, chlorophyll b may become available as LHCII degrades and may be incorporated into newly synthesized PS II core complexes. As indicated in Fig. 6 and Table 2, these PS II complexes are fully functional although the majority of chlorophyll a binding sites are occupied by chlorophyll b. The probability with which chlorophyll b is incorporated into these complexes may depend on the size of the pool of available chlorophyll b relative to that of chlorophyll a. This apparent lack of specificity of chlorophyll binding supports the notion that the chlorophyll complement of photosynthetic organisms depends on which enzymes for chlorophyll synthesis happen to be present (27).
In further support of this argument, in the oxygenic prokaryote Acaryochloris marina, chlorophyll d is the major pigment of the photosystems, whereas chlorophyll a is a minor component (28, 29). Unless this organism has adapted its photosystems to be able to bind and use a different chlorophyll at essentially all positions, the simplest explanation is that there is little specificity for exactly which chlorophyll is bound. A similar situation may occur in prochlorophytes, which have chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins that are closely related to the iron-stress-induced protein (Isi A) of cyanobacteria (30) and PS II core antenna proteins CP43 and CP47. The latter two bind only chlorophyll a in plants and cyanobacteria. Indeed, on in vitro reconstitution of LHCII with different ratios of chlorophyll a and b, one can obtain a situation where LHCII has bound much more chlorophyll b than a (31). Moreover, LHC from the red alga Porphyridium cruentum, which normally contains only chlorophyll a, under in vitro conditions can functionally bind chlorophylls b and c as well (32). Therefore, the pigment composition of an organism is not a reliable criterion for determining evolutionary relationships. Indeed, phylogenetically the chlorophyll b-containing prochlorophytes appear to be interspersed among cyanobacteria that lack this pigment (33).
Pigment analysis of isolated PS II complexes (Fig. 3) and fluorescence emission data (Figs. 4 and 7) demonstrate that chlorophyll b replaces part of chlorophyll a in the PS II core. Moreover, the energy absorbed by chlorophyll b can be used efficiently by the reaction centers and can cause QA reduction (Fig. 6). Because of the high amount of chlorophyll b in the cao+/lhcb+ cells and the limited specificity of the chlorophyll-binding sites, it is likely that chlorophyll b occupies chlorophyll a-binding sites even in the PS II reaction center itself and not only in the CP43 and CP47 core antenna proteins. Moreover, pheophytin b, which was detected in the pigment extracts from chlorophyll b-containing cells (Fig. 1), may also replace native pheophytin a in the PS II reaction centers.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Judy Brusslan (California State University, Long Beach) for her generous gift of the A. thaliana expressed sequence tag cDNA clone containing the cao gene. We also thank Dr. Daniel Brune (Arizona State University) for his help in protein microsequencing. This work was funded by a grant from the Department of Energy (DE-FG03–95ER20180).
Abbreviations
- CAO
chlorophyll(ide) a oxygenase
- LHC
light-harvesting complex
- PS
photosystem
References
- 1.Castelfranco P A, Beale S I. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1983;34:242–278. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tanaka A, Ito H, Tanaka R, Yoshida K, Okada K. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:12719–12723. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Espineda C E, Linford A S, Devine D, Brusslan J A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:10507–10511. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tomitani A, Okasa K, Miyashita H, Matthijs H C, Ohno T, Tanaka A. Nature (London) 1999;400:159–162. doi: 10.1038/22101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Oster U, Tanaka R, Tanaka A, Rudiger W. Plant J. 2000;21:305–310. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00672.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Plumley F G, Schmidt G W. Plant Cell. 1995;7:689–704. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.6.689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thornber J P, Highkin H R. Eur J Biochem. 1974;41:109–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03250.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Terao T, Katoh S. Plant Cell Physiol. 1989;30:571–580. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Murray D L, Kohorn B D. Plant Mol Biol. 1991;16:71–79. doi: 10.1007/BF00017918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kuttkat A, Edhofer I, Eichacker L A, Paulsen H. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:20451–20455. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.33.20451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Paulsen K, Finkenzeller B, Kühlein N. Eur J Biochem. 1993;215:809–816. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18096.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Satoh S, Ikeuchi M, Mimuro M, Tanaka A. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:4293–4297. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008238200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.He Q, Schlich T, Paulsen H, Vermaas W. Eur J Biochem. 1999;263:561–570. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00526.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wu Q, Vermaas W F J. Plant Mol Biol. 1995;29:933–945. doi: 10.1007/BF00014967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shen G, Boussiba S, Vermaas W F J. Plant Cell. 1993;5:1853–1863. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.12.1853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rippka R, Deruelles J, Waterbury J V, Herdmann M, Stanier R Y. J Gen Microbiol. 1979;111:1–61. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Newman T, de Bruijn F J, Green P, Keegstra K, Kende H, McIntosh L, Ohlrogge J, Raikhel N, Somerville S, Thomashow M, et al. Plant Physiol. 1994;106:1241–1255. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.4.1241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lichtenthaler H K. Methods Enzymol. 1987;148:350–382. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tang X-S, Diner B A. Biochemistry. 1994;33:4594–4603. doi: 10.1021/bi00181a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ikeuchi M, Inoue Y. Plant Cell Physiol. 1988;29:1233–1239. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mohamed A, Jansson C. Plant Mol Biol. 1989;13:693–700. doi: 10.1007/BF00016024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hunt J E, Michalski T J. In: in Chlorophylls. Scheer H, editor. Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 1991. pp. 835–853. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shen G, Vermaas W F J. Biochemistry. 1994;33:7379–7388. doi: 10.1021/bi00189a044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vermaas W F J. In: The Chloroplast: From Molecular Biology to Biotechnology. Argyroudi-Akoyunoglou J, Senger H, editors. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic; 1999. pp. 253–258. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Groot M L, Peterman E J, van Stokkum I H, Dekker J P, van Grondelle R. Biophys J. 1995;68:281–290. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80186-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Maloney M A, Hoober J K, Marks D B. Plant Physiol. 1989;91:1100–1106. doi: 10.1104/pp.91.3.1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Green B R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:2119–2121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061023198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Miyashita H, Ikemoto H, Kurano N, Adachi K, Chihara M, Miyachi S. Nature (London) 1996;383:402. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hu Q, Miyashita H, Iwasaki I, Kurano N, Miyachi S, Iwaki M, Itoh S. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:13319–13323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.22.13319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.La Roche J, van der Staay G W M, Partensky F, Ducret A, Aebersold R, Li R, Golden S S, Hiller R G, Wrench P M, Larkum A W D, Green B R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:15244–15248. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kleima F J, Hobe S, Calkoen F, Urbanus M L, Peterman E J G, van Grondelle R, Paulsen H, van Amerongen H. Biochemistry. 1999;38:6587–6596. doi: 10.1021/bi982823v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Grabowski B, Cunningham F X, Gantt E. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:2911–2916. doi: 10.1073/pnas.031587198. . (First Published February 13, 2001; 10.1073/pnas.031587198) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Palenik B, Haselkorn R. Nature (London) 1992;355:265–267. doi: 10.1038/355265a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]