Skip to main content
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
. 2018 Aug 27;12:337. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00337

The 100 Most Cited Papers Concerning the Insular Cortex of the Brain: A Bibliometric Analysis

Andy W K Yeung 1,*
PMCID: PMC6119810  PMID: 30210323

Abstract

Background: The insula is one of the most researched brain regions with many highly cited papers. However, unlike the literature of other fields, there is currently no study that has identified the 100 most cited papers within the literature of the insula. The aim of the current study was to fill in the knowledge gap by determining which publications concerning the insula have been cited most often, who contributed to them, and what topics they were dealing with.

Methods: The Web of Science online database was searched to identify the 100 most cited publications mentioning the insular cortex in their titles, abstracts or keywords. To systematically exclude irrelevant publications, the search strategy was finalized as: TS = (insula OR insular OR “island of Reil”) NOT TS = (“insular biogeography” OR “insular mammal*” OR “*insular lymphatic*”) NOT WC = (“Geochemistry and Geophysics” OR “Ecology”). The identified publications were sorted in descending order of citation count. The 100 most cited publications concerning the insula of the brain were identified and their bibliometric data was extracted and assessed. The VOSviewer software was used with default parameters to generate a bubble map that analyzes and visualizes the words/phrases used in the titles and abstracts of the publications.

Results: There were 67 articles on experiments/lab studies and 33 meta-analyses/reviews but no opinion or methods paper. They had an average of 943.4 citations (or 62.9 citations per year), 93.5 references and 13.4 pages. There were 35 papers published in open access. USA was the major contributing country. The most top-ranked publications were concerning emotion, salience and pain.

Conclusion: Two-thirds of the publications concerned the normal brain function/mechanism (n = 67), whereas 20 publications concerned disease/therapeutic intervention and another 13 concerned normal anatomy. For the 67 original articles, 57 used human subjects whereas 10 used animal models. MRI was the commonest modality (n = 37), followed by PET (n = 16). Nine articles investigated by histology, two by multiple modalities and three by other modality.

Keywords: bibliometric, brain, insular cortex, insula of Reil, neurosciences, publications

Introduction

The word “insula” was firstly coined by Professor Reil and the insula is also known as “Island of Reil” (Reil, 2002; Binder et al., 2007). It is a fascinating structure of the cerebral cortex that has multiple functions and clinical relevance. For instance, it is involved in sensory processing (Naghavi et al., 2007; Yeung et al., 2016, 2018a), motor control (Ackermann and Riecker, 2004), interoceptive awareness (Naqvi and Bechara, 2010), autonomic control (Yasui et al., 1991), and social emotions (Lamm and Singer, 2010). It is often investigated in clinical topics such as addiction (Naqvi and Bechara, 2009), anorexia nervosa (Wagner et al., 2008), and stroke (Cereda et al., 2002). In short, the insula is involved in many researches, ranging from neurology, neuropathology, psychiatry, and psychology.

The evaluation of the academic impact of the published literature in terms of citation count has been gaining attention. It not only allows the evaluation of research performance, but also helps investigators refine their research blueprint based on the research trends and overall landscape of the research field (Brinjikji et al., 2013; Yeung et al., 2017a). There are already numerous reports that identified the 100 most cited articles, also known as citation classics, in various fields such as imaging (Brinjikji et al., 2013), radiology (Yoon et al., 2013; Pagni et al., 2014), neuroimaging (Kim et al., 2016), neurosurgery (Ponce and Lozano, 2010), and neurosciences (Yeung et al., 2017a). Analyses based on citation counts are primarily supported by an earlier notion that citation counts could be correlated to peer judgments (Bayer and Folger, 1966; Garfield, 1970), which are in turn commonly accepted as a way to rank scientific performance (Garfield, 1979). Citation counts are not without problems. For instance, MacRoberts and MacRoberts (1989) have pointed out that potential problems of citation analysis included inability to assess formal and informal influences not expressed as journal citations, biased citation behavior, self-citation, different meaning of each citation, variations in citation rates due to various background parameters of a publication, and technical shortcomings of citation databases. Nonetheless, citation analysis and journal impact factors are used in many circumstances, such as determining departmental funding in the universities, assessing research grant proposals, and deciding promotions and appointments of academic staff (Adam, 2002). Therefore, results reported in bibliometric studies enabled researchers to quickly identify the most cited publications of the respective field so that they might further the research works or develop new research directions based on these cornerstones (Khan et al., 2017). However, such bibliometric evaluation has not been applied to the research of the insula, a versatile multifunctional brain region and a research hot topic with highly cited papers (Yeung et al., 2017c; Yeung, 2018). Therefore, the aim of the current study was to fill in the knowledge gap by determining which publications concerning the insula have been cited most often, who contributed to them, and what topics they were dealing with. In particular, the current study tried to analyze what factors were related to the citation counts, e.g., normalized citation count, reference count, usage count, years since publication, number of authors, page count, whether the publications were in open access, the publication type, study topic, the study model, and the modality used.

Materials and methods

Search method and strategy

The search was performed on 18 July 2018 using the Web of Science (WoS) online database hosted by Clarivate Analytics. Based on a pilot search, the author found that some of the highly cited publications mentioning the word “insula” or its derivatives are not related to the insular cortex of the brain, such as those concerning insular biogeography (investigation of animals and plants in isolated natural environments) and those concerning peri-insular lymphatics of the pancreas. To systematically exclude these irrelevant publications instead of having a subjective manual exclusion, the search strategy was finalized as: TS = (insula OR insular OR “island of Reil”) NOT TS = (“insular biogeography” OR “insular mammal*” OR “*insular lymphatic*”) NOT WC = (“Geochemistry and Geophysics” OR “Ecology”). It identified publications mentioning the insula in their titles, abstracts, author keywords or KeyWord Plus (keywords indexed by WoS). Keywords serve the function of providing rapid access to scientific works (Soos et al., 2013) and are useful for bibliometric analyses (Stock and Stock, 2013; Zhang et al., 2016; Vargas-Quesada et al., 2017), and thus were considered together with abstracts and titles. No other restriction was placed on the search, such as publication year. The identified publications were sorted in descending order of citation count. The 100 most cited publications concerning the insula of the brain were identified and their bibliometric data was extracted and assessed, including the author list, affiliation, country of affiliation, journal, language, WoS category of the publication, publication year, number of references, number of citations, number of pages of the manuscript, and status of open access, the publication type (experiment/lab studies, methods, meta-analysis/review/opinion), and the study topic (normal brain function/mechanism, disease/therapeutic intervention, normal anatomy). For experiment/lab studies, the study model (human, animal, computational, multiple) and modality [magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), multiple, histology, others] were also assessed.

Network visualization

VOSviewer, software designed to visualize bibliometric data (Van Eck and Waltman, 2009), was used to generate a bubble map that analyzes and visualizes the words/phrases used in the titles and abstracts of the 100 publications. All words/phrases that appeared in two or more of the 100 publications were included. Binary counting was used, implying that multiple appearances in a single publication counted as one. Default visualization parameters were chosen. Two bubbles were in closer proximity if they co-appeared in a larger number of publications. The number of publications in which the word/phrase appeared determined the bubble size. The bubble color was determined by the averaged citations per publication containing the word/phrase. This method has been successfully used to analyze the titles and abstracts of publications from neuroimaging, neurosciences, food sciences and pharmacology (Yeung et al., 2017b,c, 2018b,c; Yeung, 2018).

Statistical analysis

Exploratory analysis was performed to evaluate if the citation count had significant associations with the numbers of normalized citation count (citations per year after publication), years since publication, references, pages, authors, as well as the usage count since 2013 (i.e., the number of times the full text of a publication was accessed or saved through WoS), status of open access, publication type, study topic, study model, and modality. Pearson's correlation tests were conducted to assess the former six variables, whereas two-sample t test was conducted to assess the latter five variables. For the last four variables, either only two groups had values or the groupings were binarized (e.g., study topic binarized into findings from healthy brains/patients and from patients with diseases/disorders; and modality binarized into MRI and non-MRI). The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 25.0 (IBM, New York, USA). Test results with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The overview

The publication years of top 100 most cited publications of the insula were happened to be from 1982 to 2011. The list was presented in Table 1. There were 67 articles on experiments/lab studies and 33 meta-analyses/reviews but no opinion or methods paper. They have received a total of 94,340 citations from 61,624 citing articles, equaling an average of 943.4 citations (SD = 506.2, range = 544–2924). When the citation counts were normalized by the number of years since publication, the average value became 62.9 (SD = 46.3, range = 17.9–268.7). The usage count since 2013 through WoS had an average of 140 times (SD = 143, range = 6–680). On average they had a whopping number of 93.5 references (SD = 73.4, range = 19–387). The average length of the manuscript was 13.4 pages (SD = 8.3, range = 3–47). There were 35 papers published in open access (gold, bronze or green open access). All of them were written in English. Two-thirds of the publications concerned the normal brain function/mechanism (n = 67), whereas 20 publications concerned disease/therapeutic intervention and another 13 concerned normal anatomy.

Table 1.

The top 100 citation classics concerning the insula of the brain.

Rank Paper No. of references Citation count Citations per year
1 Good, C. D., Johnsrude, I., Ashburner, J., Henson, R. N., Friston, K. J., and Frackowiak, R. S. (2001). A voxel-based morphometric study of aging in 465 normal adult human brains. NeuroImage 14, 21–36. 66 2,924 172.0
2 Seeley, W. W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A. F., Keller, J., Glover, G. H., Kenna, H., …and Greicius, M. D. (2007). Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(9), 2349-2356. 64 2,523 229.4
3 Craig, A. D., and Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel–now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59-70. 128 2,418 268.7
4 Cabeza, R., and Nyberg, L. (2000). Imaging cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(1), 1-47. 386 2,320 128.9
5 Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(8), 655-666. 159 2,313 144.6
6 Devinsky, O., Morrell, M. J., and Vogt, B. A. (1995). Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behavior. Brain, 118(1), 279-306. 246 2,222 96.6
7 Phan, K. L., Wager, T., Taylor, S. F., and Liberzon, I. (2002). Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. NeuroImage, 16(2), 331-348. 131 1,944 121.5
8 Koob, G. F., and Volkow, N. D. (2010). Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology, 35(1), 217-238. 239 1,896 237.0
9 Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., and Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303(5661), 1157-1162. 38 1,884 134.6
10 Bechara, A., Damasio, H., and Damasio, A. R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), 295-307. 62 1,695 94.2
11 Critchley, H. D., Wiens, S., Rotshtein, P., Öhman, A., and Dolan, R. J. (2004). Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 7(2), 189-195. 47 1,559 111.4
12 Mayberg, H. S., Liotti, M., Brannan, S. K., McGinnis, S., Mahurin, R. K., Jerabek, P. A., …and Fox, P. T. (1999). Reciprocal limbic-cortical function and negative mood: converging PET findings in depression and normal sadness. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(5), 675-682. 59 1,521 80.1
13 Menon, V., and Uddin, L. Q. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Structure and Function, 214(5-6), 655-667. 93 1,519 189.9
14 Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., and Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300(5626), 1755-1758. 28 1,471 98.1
15 Apkarian, A. V., Bushnell, M. C., Treede, R. D., and Zubieta, J. K. (2005). Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. European Journal of Pain, 9(4), 463-484. 239 1,412 108.6
16 Etkin, A., and Wager, T. D. (2007). Functional neuroimaging of anxiety: a meta-analysis of emotional processing in PTSD, social anxiety disorder, and specific phobia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(10), 1476-1488. 119 1,403 127.5
17 Peyron, R., Laurent, B., and Garcia-Larrea, L. (2000). Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis (2000). Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology, 30(5), 263-288. 168 1,292 71.8
18 Cardinal, R. N., Parkinson, J. A., Hall, J., & Everitt, B. J. (2002). Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 26(3), 321-352. 374 1,257 78.6
19 Phillips, M. L., Drevets, W. C., Rauch, S. L., & Lane, R. (2003). Neurobiology of emotion perception I: The neural basis of normal emotion perception. Biological Psychiatry, 54(5), 504-514. 144 1,245 83.0
20 Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G. L., & Petersen, S. E. (1991). Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. Journal of Neuroscience, 11(8), 2383-2402. 133 1,204 44.6
21 Raichle, M. E., Fiez, J. A., Videen, T. O., MacLeod, A. M. K., Pardo, J. V., Fox, P. T., & Petersen, S. E. (1994). Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. Cerebral Cortex, 4(1), 8-26. 90 1,122 46.8
22 Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J. P., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2003). Both of us disgusted in My insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron, 40(3), 655-664. 64 1,107 73.8
23 Augustine, J. R. (1996). Circuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans. Brain Research Reviews, 22(3), 229-244. 81 1,091 49.6
24 Dosenbach, N. U., Fair, D. A., Miezin, F. M., Cohen, A. L., Wenger, K. K., Dosenbach, R. A., …& Schlaggar, B. L. (2007). Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(26), 11073-11078. 55 1,086 98.7
25 Carr, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M. C., Mazziotta, J. C., & Lenzi, G. L. (2003). Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(9), 5497-5502. 60 1,059 70.6
26 Phillips, M. L., Young, A. W., Senior, C., Brammer, M., Andrew, C., Calder, A. J., …& Gray, J. A. (1997). A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust. Nature, 389(6650), 495-498. 30 1,050 50.0
27 Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(9), 396-403. 68 1,046 74.7
28 Phillips, M. L., Drevets, W. C., Rauch, S. L., & Lane, R. (2003). Neurobiology of emotion perception II: implications for major psychiatric disorders. Biological Psychiatry, 54(5), 515-528. 147 1,032 68.8
29 Craig, A. D. (2003). Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13(4), 500-505. 55 1,028 68.5
30 Wager, T. D., Rilling, J. K., Smith, E. E., Sokolik, A., Casey, K. L., Davidson, R. J., …& Cohen, J. D. (2004). Placebo-induced changes in FMRI in the anticipation and experience of pain. Science, 303(5661), 1162-1167. 37 1,026 73.3
31 Davidson, R. J., & Irwin, W. (1999). The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(1), 11-21. 101 1,001 52.7
32 Adolphs, R. (2002). Neural systems for recognizing emotion. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12(2), 169-177. 99 994 62.1
33 Sridharan, D., Levitin, D. J., & Menon, V. (2008). A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(34), 12569-12574. 53 982 98.2
34 Arnold, S. E., Hyman, B. T., Flory, J., Damasio, A. R., & Van Hoesen, G. W. (1991). The topographical and neuroanatomical distribution of neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques in the cerebral cortex of patients with Alzheimer's disease. Cerebral Cortex, 1(1), 103-116. 74 923 34.2
35 Garavan, H., Ross, T. J., & Stein, E. A. (1999). Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(14), 8301-8306. 49 911 47.9
36 Morris, J. S., Friston, K. J., Büchel, C., Frith, C. D., Young, A. W., Calder, A. J., & Dolan, R. J. (1998). A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions. Brain, 121(1), 47-57. 76 852 42.6
37 Dosenbach, N. U., Visscher, K. M., Palmer, E. D., Miezin, F. M., Wenger, K. K., Kang, H. C., …& Petersen, S. E. (2006). A core system for the implementation of task sets. Neuron, 50(5), 799-812. 81 849 70.8
38 Price, C. J. (2000). The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging. Journal of Anatomy, 197(3), 335-359. 125 849 47.2
39 Breiter, H. C., Gollub, R. L., Weisskoff, R. M., Kennedy, D. N., Makris, N., Berke, J. D., …& Mathew, R. T. (1997). Acute effects of cocaine on human brain activity and emotion. Neuron, 19(3), 591-611. 113 844 40.2
40 Sweatt, J. D. (2001). The neuronal MAP kinase cascade: a biochemical signal integration system subserving synaptic plasticity and memory. Journal of Neurochemistry, 76(1), 1-10. 65 815 47.9
41 Chollet, F., DiPiero, V., Wise, R. J. S., Brooks, D. J., Dolan, R. J., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1991). The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography. Annals of Neurology, 29(1), 63-71. 37 804 29.8
42 Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439(7075), 466. 29 784 65.3
43 Brog, J. S., Salyapongse, A., Deutch, A. Y., & Zahm, D. S. (1993). The patterns of afferent innervation of the core and shell in the “accumbens” part of the rat ventral striatum: immunohistochemical detection of retrogradely transported fluoro-gold. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 338(2), 255-278. 122 781 31.2
44 Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Dronkers, N. F., Rankin, K. P., Ogar, J. M., Phengrasamy, L., Rosen, H. J., …& Miller, B. L. (2004). Cognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia. Annals of Neurology, 55(3), 335-346. 74 756 54.0
45 Suzuki, W. L., & Amaral, D. G. (1994). Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices of the macaque monkey: cortical afferents. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 350(4), 497-533. 108 747 31.1
46 Oppenheimer, S. M., Gelb, A., Girvin, J. P., & Hachinski, V. C. (1992). Cardiovascular effects of human insular cortex stimulation. Neurology, 42(9), 1727-1727. 25 743 28.6
47 Ploghaus, A., Tracey, I., Gati, J. S., Clare, S., Menon, R. S., Matthews, P. M., & Rawlins, J. N. P. (1999). Dissociating pain from its anticipation in the human brain. Science, 284(5422), 1979-1981. 25 741 39.0
48 Carmichael, S. T., & Price, J. L. (1995). Limbic connections of the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex in macaque monkeys. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 363(4), 615-641. 114 739 32.1
49 Bandler, R., & Shipley, M. T. (1994). Columnar organization in the midbrain periaqueductal gray: modules for emotional expression?. Trends in Neurosciences, 17(9), 379-389. 71 735 30.6
50 Vertes, R. P. (2004). Differential projections of the infralimbic and prelimbic cortex in the rat. Synapse, 51(1), 32-58. 192 725 51.8
51 Date, Y., Ueta, Y., Yamashita, H., Yamaguchi, H., Matsukura, S., Kangawa, K., …& Nakazato, M. (1999). Orexins, orexigenic hypothalamic peptides, interact with autonomic, neuroendocrine and neuroregulatory systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(2), 748-753. 19 719 37.8
52 Dronkers, N. F. (1996). A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation. Nature, 384(6605), 159-161. 29 717 32.6
53 Jahanshahi, M., Jenkins, I. H., Brown, R. G., Marsden, C. D., Passingham, R. E., & Brooks, D. J. (1995). Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements: I. An investigation using measurement of regional cerebral blood flow with PET and movement-related potentials in normal and Parkinson's disease subjects. Brain, 118(4), 913-933. 82 710 30.9
54 Braun, A. R., Balkin, T. J., Wesenten, N. J., Carson, R. E., Varga, M., Baldwin, P., …& Herscovitch, P. (1997). Regional cerebral blood flow throughout the sleep-wake cycle. An H2(15)O PET study. Brain, 120(7), 1173-1197. 117 709 33.8
55 Goldin, P. R., McRae, K., Ramel, W., & Gross, J. J. (2008). The neural bases of emotion regulation: reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion. Biological Psychiatry, 63(6), 577-586. 51 703 70.3
56 Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2004). The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. NeuroImage, 21(3), 1155-1166. 92 701 50.1
57 Mayberg, H. S., Brannan, S. K., Tekell, J. L., Silva, J. A., Mahurin, R. K., McGinnis, S., & Jerabek, P. A. (2000). Regional metabolic effects of fluoxetine in major depression: serial changes and relationship to clinical response. Biological Psychiatry, 48(8), 830-843. 121 696 38.7
58 Balleine, B. W., & Dickinson, A. (1998). Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates. Neuropharmacology, 37(4-5), 407-419. 50 696 34.8
59 Resnick, S. M., Pham, D. L., Kraut, M. A., Zonderman, A. B., & Davatzikos, C. (2003). Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies of older adults: a shrinking brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(8), 3295-3301. 40 685 45.7
60 Menon, V., Adleman, N. E., White, C. D., Glover, G. H., & Reiss, A. L. (2001). Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Human Brain Mapping, 12(3), 131-143. 62 680 40.0
61 Critchley, H. D. (2005). Neural mechanisms of autonomic, affective, and cognitive integration. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 493(1), 154-166. 96 670 51.5
62 Shin, L. M., & Liberzon, I. (2010). The neurocircuitry of fear, stress, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology, 35(1), 169-191. 387 667 83.4
63 Small, D. M., Zatorre, R. J., Dagher, A., Evans, A. C., & Jones-Gotman, M. (2001). Changes in brain activity related to eating chocolate: from pleasure to aversion. Brain, 124(9), 1720-1733. 89 665 39.1
64 Weiller, C., Chollet, F., Friston, K. J., Wise, R. J., & Frackowiak, R. S. (1992). Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man. Annals of Neurology, 31(5), 463-472. 37 663 25.5
65 Treede, R. D., Kenshalo, D. R., Gracely, R. H., & Jones, A. K. (1999). The cortical representation of pain. Pain, 79(2-3), 105-111. 56 658 34.6
66 Fusar-Poli, P., Placentino, A., Carletti, F., Landi, P., Allen, P., Surguladze, S., …& Perez, J. (2009). Functional atlas of emotional faces processing: a voxel-based meta-analysis of 105 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 34(6), 418-432. 177 649 72.1
67 Mesulam, M. M., & Mufson, E. J. (1982). Insula of the old world monkey. III: Efferent cortical output and comments on function. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 212(1), 38-52. 38 646 17.9
68 Büchel, C., Morris, J., Dolan, R. J., & Friston, K. J. (1998). Brain systems mediating aversive conditioning: an event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 20(5), 947-957. 58 643 32.2
69 Lamm, C., Decety, J., & Singer, T. (2011). Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. NeuroImage, 54(3), 2492-2502. 73 638 91.1
70 Coghill, R. C., Sang, C. N., Maisog, J. M., & Iadarola, M. J. (1999). Pain intensity processing within the human brain: a bilateral, distributed mechanism. Journal of Neurophysiology, 82(4), 1934-1943. 59 635 33.4
71 Winston, J. S., Strange, B. A., O'Doherty, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nature Neuroscience, 5(3), 277-283. 50 628 39.3
72 Paulus, M. P., & Stein, M. B. (2006). An insular view of anxiety. Biological Psychiatry, 60(4), 383-387. 33 626 52.2
73 Berendse, H. W., Galis-De Graaf, Y., & Groenewegen, H. J. (1992). Topographical organization and relationship with ventral striatal compartments of prefrontal corticostriatal projections in the rat. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 316(3), 314-347. 139 623 24.0
74 Hölzel, B. K., Lazar, S. W., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D. R., & Ott, U. (2011). How does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 537-559. 243 620 88.6
75 Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., & Decety, J. (2007). The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(1), 42-58. 70 614 55.8
76 Goldman, R. I., Stern, J. M., Engel Jr, J., & Cohen, M. S. (2002). Simultaneous EEG and fMRI of the alpha rhythm. NeuroReport, 13(18), 2487-2492. 29 613 38.3
77 Lazar, S. W., Kerr, C. E., Wasserman, R. H., Gray, J. R., Greve, D. N., Treadway, M. T., …& Rauch, S. L. (2005). Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness. NeuroReport, 16(17), 1893-1897. 25 612 47.1
78 Myers, K. M., & Davis, M. (2002). Behavioral and neural analysis of extinction. Neuron, 36(4), 567-584. 145 609 38.1
79 Zatorre, R. J., Evans, A. C., & Meyer, E. (1994). Neural mechanisms underlying melodic perception and memory for pitch. Journal of Neuroscience, 14(4), 1908-1919. 72 606 25.3
80 Downar, J., Crawley, A. P., Mikulis, D. J., & Davis, K. D. (2000). A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nature Neuroscience, 3(3), 277. 31 600 33.3
81 Fink, G. R., Markowitsch, H. J., Reinkemeier, M., Bruckbauer, T., Kessler, J., & Heiss, W. D. (1996). Cerebral representation of one's own past: neural networks involved in autobiographical memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 16(13), 4275-4282. 80 600 27.3
82 Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2005). How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. NeuroImage, 24(3), 771-779. 79 592 45.5
83 Knutson, B., Westdorp, A., Kaiser, E., & Hommer, D. (2000). FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task. NeuroImage, 12(1), 20-27. 36 585 32.5
84 Calvert, G. A. (2001). Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 11(12), 1110-1123. 95 584 34.4
85 Makris, N., Kennedy, D. N., McInerney, S., Sorensen, A. G., Wang, R., Caviness Jr, V. S., & Pandya, D. N. (2004). Segmentation of subcomponents within the superior longitudinal fascicle in humans: a quantitative, in vivo, DT-MRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 15(6), 854-869. 102 582 44.8
86 Price, C. J. (2010). The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191(1), 62-88. 135 581 72.6
87 Bush, G., Frazier, J. A., Rauch, S. L., Seidman, L. J., Whalen, P. J., Jenike, M. A., …& Biederman, J. (1999). Anterior cingulate cortex dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder revealed by fMRI and the Counting Stroop. Biological Psychiatry, 45(12), 1542-1552. 86 581 30.6
88 Coghill, R. C., Talbot, J. D., Evans, A. C., Meyer, E., Gjedde, A., Bushnell, M. C., & Duncan, G. H. (1994). Distributed processing of pain and vibration by the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 14(7), 4095-4108. 121 581 24.2
89 Garavan, H., Pankiewicz, J., Bloom, A., Cho, J. K., Sperry, L., Ross, T. J., …& Stein, E. A. (2000). Cue-induced cocaine craving: neuroanatomical specificity for drug users and drug stimuli. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(11), 1789-1798. 45 576 32.0
90 Naqvi, N. H., Rudrauf, D., Damasio, H., & Bechara, A. (2007). Damage to the insula disrupts addiction to cigarette smoking. Science, 315(5811), 531-534. 29 573 52.1
91 Murphy, F. C., Nimmo-Smith, I. A. N., & Lawrence, A. D. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of emotions: a meta-analysis. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3(3), 207-233. 229 571 38.1
92 Vertes, R. P. (1991). A PHA-L analysis of ascending projections of the dorsal raphe nucleus in the rat. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 313(4), 643-668. 141 567 21.0
93 Phelps, E. A., O'Connor, K. J., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., Grillon, C., & Davis, M. (2001). Activation of the left amygdala to a cognitive representation of fear. Nature Neuroscience, 4(4), 437-441. 28 565 33.2
94 Craig, A. D., Chen, K., Bandy, D., & Reiman, E. M. (2000). Thermosensory activation of insular cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 3(2), 184-190. 50 561 31.2
95 Phillips, M. L., Young, A. W., Scott, S., Calder, A. J., Andrew, C., Giampietro, V., …& Gray, J. A. (1998). Neural responses to facial and vocal expressions of fear and disgust. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 265(1408), 1809-1817. 41 554 27.7
96 Johnstone, T., van Reekum, C. M., Urry, H. L., Kalin, N. H., & Davidson, R. J. (2007). Failure to regulate: counterproductive recruitment of top-down prefrontal-subcortical circuitry in major depression. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(33), 8877-8884. 52 553 50.3
97 Kuhnen, C. M., & Knutson, B. (2005). The neural basis of financial risk taking. Neuron, 47(5), 763-770. 37 550 42.3
98 Reiman, E. M., Lane, R. D., Ahern, G. L., Schwartz, G. E., Davidson, R. J., Friston, K. J., …& Chen, K. (1997). Neuroanatomical correlates of externally and internally generated human emotion. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(7), 918-925. 45 550 26.2
99 Weiller, C., Ramsay, S. C., Wise, R. J., Friston, K. J., & Frackowiak, R. S. (1993). Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral cortex after capsular infarction. Annals of Neurology, 33(2), 181-189. 40 545 21.8
100 Quirk, G. J., Likhtik, E., Pelletier, J. G., & Paré, D. (2003). Stimulation of medial prefrontal cortex decreases the responsiveness of central amygdala output neurons. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(25), 8800-8807. 62 544 36.3

For the 67 original articles, 57 used human subjects whereas 10 used animal models. MRI was the commonest modality (n = 37), followed by PET (n = 16). Nine articles investigated by histology, two by multiple modalities and three by other modality.

Citation count was significantly correlated with normalized citation count (r = 0.840, p < 0.001), reference count (r = 0.289, p = 0.004), usage count (r = 0.702, p < 0.001) but not years since publication (r = −0.161, p = 0.109), number of authors (r = −0.071, p = 0.482), and page count (r = 0.172, p = 0.087). Averaged citation count of open access publications (293.2, SD = 435.1) did not differ from that of non-open access counterparts (970.4, SD = 542.0) (p = 0.470). Meta-analyses/reviews generally had more citations than experiments/lab studies (1,171.5 vs. 831.0, p = 0.004). Articles reporting findings from normal subjects had more citations than those reporting from patients with diseases/disorders (991.1 vs. 752.5, p = 0.003). Articles using human model had more citations than those using animal models (857vs. 678.8, p = 0.009). Meanwhile, MRI (906.1, SD = 539.6) and non-MRI (738.5, SD = 213.3) articles did not have significant difference in their average citation counts (p = 0.090).

Major contributors

The citation classics were contributed by 361 authors working in 130 affiliations in 13 countries. They were published in 38 journals. The five major contributing affiliations were Stanford University (n = 8), Harvard University (n = 8), University College London (n = 6), Massachusetts General Hospital, National Institute of Mental Health, University of Iowa and Washington University (each n = 5). The top five major contributing countries were USA (n = 70), UK (n = 27), Canada (n = 11), Germany (n = 6), and Italy (n = 5). The top five major contributing journals were Journal of Neuroscience (n = 8), Journal of Comparative Neurology (n = 7), Biological Psychiatry, NeuroImage, and Neuron (each n = 6). The top five major WoS categories to which the citation classics were assigned were neurosciences (n = 79), multidisciplinary sciences (n = 14), clinical neurology (n = 13), psychiatry (n = 13), and neuroimaging, radiology/ nuclear medicine/ medical imaging and zoology (each n = 7). Note that each publication could be assigned to multiple WoS categories.

Bubble map visualizing terms in titles and abstracts

Figure 1 shows the bubble map that visualizes the words/phrases used in the titles and abstracts of the 100 publications. Various aspects of the publications might be observed. First, functional magnetic resonance imaging (appearances = 24, average citations = 937.2) and positron emission tomography (appearances = 15, average citations = 944.1) were the two main imaging modalities. When the underlying data of the bubble map was examined, computed tomography, the popular modality used in medical field, was absent. This has implied that the most cited publications on the insula have been focusing on functional neuroimaging heavily.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Bubble map visualizing the words/phrases used in the titles and abstracts of the 100 most cited publications concerning the insular cortex of the brain. All words/phrases that appeared in two or more of the 100 publications were included. Binary counting was used, implying that multiple appearances in a single publication counted as one. Default visualization parameters of the software VOSviewer were chosen. Two bubbles were in closer proximity if they co-appeared in a larger number of publications. The number of publications in which the word/phrase appeared determined the bubble size. The bubble color was determined by the averaged citations per publication containing the word/phrase.

Second, the bubble representing insula was close to bubbles of words related to functions, such as mechanism (appearances = 20, average citations = 951.9), processing (appearances = 18, average citations = 997.2), response (appearances = 29, average citations = 893.7), role (appearances = 20, average citations = 970.1), activation (appearances = 25, average citations = 891.5), and control (appearances = 18, average citations = 992.1). Certainly, the structure (appearances = 20, average citations = 1031.3) of the insula was also one of the main involved topics.

Third, brain regions that were often mentioned together with the insula (10 times or more) included the amygdala (appearances = 31, average citations = 1027.7), thalamus (appearances = 19, average citations = 833.4), anterior cingulate (appearances = 17, average citations = 993.1) and prefrontal cortex (appearances = 15, average citations = 911.0), cerebellum (appearances = 11, average citations = 958.2), and hippocampus (appearances = 10, average citations = 1087.2).

Discussion

The current study has revealed that the citation classics concerning the insula were published across a long period of time spanning nearly four decades. Most of them were original articles and contributed by authors working in affiliations based in USA. Moreover, most of them were classified by WoS as dealing with neurosciences, and some of them as clinical neurology, psychiatry and neuroimaging. However, it should be noticed that seven of them were classified as dealing with zoology. This was due to the fact that Journal of Comparative Neurology encourages submissions that compare brain functions among species, also known as systems neuroscience, that can be considered as relevant to zoology. The large share of citation classics contributed by Journal of Comparative Neurology reminds us the importance and usefulness of investigations using different species as models, such as monkeys and rats.

Though all of the publications were dealing with the insula, it could be observed that brain regions often mentioned together with the insula included the amygdala, thalamus, anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex, cerebellum, and hippocampus. For instance, the top-ranked most cited insula publication investigated gray matter volume loss in aging adults, and reported that the insula and cingulate were affected but not the amygdala and the hippocampus (Good et al., 2001). Meanwhile, the 2nd-ranked most cited insula publication reported that the anterior cingulate and orbital frontoinsular cortices were involved in a salience network that linked to limbic and subcortical regions, and an executive network that communicated with prefrontal and parietal cortices (Seeley et al., 2007). A previous bibliometric report has also pointed out that neuroimaging studies on food stimulations generally had more citations if the insula, orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala were involved (Yeung, 2018). These findings have reflected that notion that the insula is an integration hub that connects multiple brain regions. Besides, Table 1 has shown that the most top-ranked publications were concerning emotion, salience and pain. One possible reason for articles investigating normal brain functions/mechanisms from healthy subjects having more citations than those investigating patients was that findings from normal subjects might be more generalizable and applicable to a larger population.

The positive correlation between citation count and reference count is consistent to many previous studies (Peters and Van Raan, 1994; Lokker et al., 2008; Farshad et al., 2013; Hanssen and Jørgensen, 2014; Fox et al., 2016). However, the Pearson correlation coefficient was very small (0.289). It implied that if a larger dataset or a different dataset was examined, it might become insignificant. The non-correlation between citation count and year since publication is also consistent with previous findings (Hanel and Haase, 2017). The current sample was small and not random, but the results of such exploratory analysis seemed to suggest that the selected insula literature did not deviate much from other representative body of literature with regards to influencing factors of citation count. The non-correlation between citation count and author count, page count or open access status, however, are inconclusive because previous studies have reported mixed results (see Table 1 of Hanel and Haase, 2017).

The most important limitation of the current study was that bibliometric analysis cannot assess the validity of or the level of scientific evidence reported by the analyzed publications. A highly cited article may not necessarily have high scientific quality. Moreover, the citation count received by a publication might depend on other factors that might not be fully considered in the current study. To start with, an article may be cited more if it was published in a more visible journal (Brink, 2013); For example, articles published in Chinese scientific journals tended to have few citations and thus leading to low journal impact factors (Ren and Rousseau, 2002). Meanwhile, the study model might also be an influencing factor. It was reported that basic research generally received more citations than clinical studies (Van Eck et al., 2013); and methods papers were often cited as a common practice so they accumulated many citations (Van Noorden et al., 2014). In the current study, human studies on average had 179 more citations than animal studies. The imaging modality may also be a factor, as a previous bibliometric study has reported that most of the highly cited neuroimaging papers used MRI compared to PET, computed tomography and ultrasonography (Kim et al., 2016). The current study also found that MRI was the commonest modality, but its usage did not significant influence citation count. Finally, there could be authors who self-cited a lot, which might then lead to an increased visibility of the articles and hence more citations from others (Fowler and Aksnes, 2007). Readers should be clearly aware of these confounding factors when they interpret the results from the current manuscript. Also, it is intuitive to reason that the citation counts from older publications should usually be larger than more recent publications, thus making the ranking and analyses biased. Nonetheless, the current results have demonstrated a strong positive correlation between total and normalized citation counts. Maybe it was partly due to the fact that the latest publication among the most cited 100 publications has already been published for 7 years. Such a long period of time might have already allowed publications to cumulate a large number of citations, as it was reported that the number of annual citations usually tended to reach a maximum of plateau 2–3 years after publication (Hansen and Henrikson, 1997).

To conclude, the current study has identified and analyzed the 100 most cited publications concerning the insula of the brain. These publications have shown that the insula is a multifunctional brain region. The top ranked papers on the list tended to focus on emotion, salience and pain. Brain regions often mentioned together with the insula included the amygdala, thalamus, anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex, cerebellum, and hippocampus. Citation count of these 100 highly cited publications correlated with their normalized citation count, number of references and usage count in WoS, but not years since publication, number of authors, page count and status of open access.

Author contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ackermann H., Riecker A. (2004). The contribution of the insula to motor aspects of speech production: a review and a hypothesis. Brain Lang. 89, 320–328. 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00347-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adam D. (2002). Citation analysis: the counting house. Nature 415, 726–729. 10.1038/415726a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bayer A. E., Folger J. (1966). Some correlates of a citation measure of productivity in science. Soc. Edu. 39, 381–390. 10.2307/2111920 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Binder D. K., Schaller K., Clusmann H. (2007). The seminal contributions of Johann-Christian Reil to anatomy, physiology, and psychiatry. Neurosurgery 61, 1091–1096. 10.1227/01.neu.0000303205.15489.23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brinjikji W., Klunder A., Kallmes D. F. (2013). The 100 most-cited articles in the imaging literature. Radiology 269, 272–276. 10.1148/radiol.13122242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brink P. A. (2013). Article visibility: journal impact factor and availability of full text in PubMed Central and open access. Cardiovasc. J. Afr. 24, 295–296. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cereda C., Ghika J., Maeder P., Bogousslavsky J. (2002). Strokes restricted to the insular cortex. Neurology 59, 1950–1955. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000038905.75660.BD [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Farshad M., Sidler C., Gerber C. (2013). Association of scientific and nonscientific factors to citation rates of articles of renowned orthopedic journals. Eur. Orthop. Traumatol. 4, 125–130. 10.1007/s12570-013-0174-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fowler J., Aksnes D. (2007). Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics 72, 427–437. 10.1007/s11192-007-1777-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fox C. W., Paine C. T., Sauterey B. (2016). Citations increase with manuscript length, author number, and references cited in ecology journals. Ecol. Evol. 6, 7717–7726. 10.1002/ece3.2505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Garfield E. (1970). Citation indexing for studying science. Nature 227, 669–671. 10.1038/227669a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Garfield E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics 1, 359–375. 10.1007/BF02019306 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Good C. D., Johnsrude I. S., Ashburner J., Henson R. N., Friston K. J., Frackowiak R. S. (2001). A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage 14, 21–36. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hanel P. H. P., Haase J. (2017). predictors of citation rate in psychology: inconclusive influence of effect and sample size. Front. Psychol. 8:1160. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hansen H., Henrikson J. (1997). How well does journal impact work in the assessment of papers onclinical physiology and nuclear medicine? Clin. Physiol. 17, 409–418. 10.1046/j.1365-2281.1997.04545.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hanssen T.-E. S., Jørgensen F. (2014). Citation counts in transportation research. Eur. Trans. Res. Rev. 6, 205–212. 10.1007/s12544-013-0122-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Khan M. S., Ullah W., Riaz I. B., Bhulani N., Manning W. J., Tridandapani S., et al. (2017). Top 100 cited articles in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a bibliometric analysis. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 18:87. 10.1186/s12968-016-0303-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim H. J., Yoon D. Y., Kim E. S., Lee K., Bae J. S., Lee J.-H. (2016). The 100 most-cited articles in neuroimaging: a bibliometric analysis. Neuroimage 139, 149–156. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lamm C., Singer T. (2010). The role of anterior insular cortex in social emotions. Brain Struct. Func. 214, 579–591. 10.1007/s00429-010-0251-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lokker C., McKibbon K. A., McKinlay R. J., Wilczynski N. L., Haynes R. B. (2008). Prediction of citation counts for clinical articles at two years using data available within three weeks of publication: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 336, 655–657. 10.1136/bmj.39482.526713.BE [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. MacRoberts M. H., MacRoberts B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: a critical review. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 40, 342–349. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Naghavi H. R., Eriksson J., Larsson A., Nyberg L. (2007). The claustrum/insula region integrates conceptually related sounds and pictures. Neurosci. Lett. 422, 77–80. 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Naqvi N. H., Bechara A. (2009). The hidden island of addiction: the insula. Trends Neurosci. 32, 56–67. 10.1016/j.tins.2008.09.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Naqvi N. H., Bechara A. (2010). The insula and drug addiction: an interoceptive view of pleasure, urges, and decision-making. Brain Struct. Func. 214, 435–450. 10.1007/s00429-010-0268-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pagni M., Khan N. R., Cohen H. L., Choudhri A. F. (2014). Highly cited works in radiology: the top 100 cited articles in radiologic journals. Acad. Radiol. 21, 1056–1066. 10.1016/j.acra.2014.03.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Peters H., Van Raan A. F. (1994). On determinants of citation scores: a case study in chemical engineering. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 45, 39–49. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ponce F. A., Lozano A. M. (2010). Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part I: the 100 top-cited papers in neurosurgical journals: a review. J. Neurosurg. 112, 223–232. 10.3171/2009.12.JNS091599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Reil J. C. (2002). The “Island of Reil” (the Insula). Rivista di Neuroradiol. 15, 285–286. 10.1177/19714009020150031512738055 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ren S., Rousseau R. (2002). International visibility of Chinese scientific journals. Scientometrics 53, 389–405. 10.1023/A:1014877130166 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Seeley W. W., Menon V., Schatzberg A. F., Keller J., Glover G. H., Kenna H., et al. (2007). Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J. Neurosci. 27, 2349–2356. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Soos S., Kampis G., Gulyás L. (2013). Large-scale temporal analysis of computer and information science. Eur. J. Special Topics 222, 1441–1465. 10.1140/epjst/e2013-01936-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Stock W. G., Stock M. (2013). Handbook of Information Science. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
  33. Van Eck N. J., Waltman L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84, 523–538. 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Eck N. J., Waltman L., Van Raan A. F., Klautz R. J., Peul W. C. (2013). Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research. PLoS ONE 8:e62395. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Van Noorden R., Maher B., Nuzzo R. (2014). The top 100 papers. Nature 514, 550–553. 10.1038/514550a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vargas-Quesada B., Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z., Rodriguez N. (2017). Identification and visualization of the intellectual structure in graphene research. Front. Res. Metrics Analyt. 2:7 10.3389/frma.2017.00007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wagner A., Aizenstein H., Mazurkewicz L., Fudge J., Frank G. K., Putnam K., et al. (2008). Altered insula response to taste stimuli in individuals recovered from restricting-type anorexia nervosa. Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 513–523. 10.1038/sj.npp.1301443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Yasui Y., Breder C. D., Safer C. B., Cechetto D. F. (1991). Autonomic responses and efferent pathways from the insular cortex in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 303, 355–374. 10.1002/cne.903030303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yeung A. W., Goto T. K., Leung W. K. (2017c). The changing landscape of neuroscience research, 2006–2015: a bibliometric study. Front. Neurosci. 11:120. 10.3389/fnins.2017.00120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yeung A. W., Tanabe H. C., Suen J. L., Goto T. K. (2016). Taste intensity modulates effective connectivity from the insular cortex to the thalamus in humans. Neuroimage 135, 214–222. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yeung A. W. K. (2018). Bibliometric study on functional magnetic resonance imaging literature (1995–2017) concerning chemosensory perception. Chemosens. Percept. 11, 42–50. 10.1007/s12078-018-9243-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yeung A. W. K., Goto T. K., Leung W. K. (2017a). At the leading front of neuroscience: a bibliometric study of the 100 most-cited articles. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11:363. 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yeung A. W. K., Goto T. K., Leung W. K. (2017b). A bibliometric review of research trends in neuroimaging. Curr. Sci. 112, 725–734. 10.18520/cs/v112/i04/725-734 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yeung A. W. K., Goto T. K., Leung W. K. (2018a). Affective value, intensity and quality of liquid tastants/food discernment in the human brain: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Neuroimage 169, 189–199. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yeung A. W. K., Heinrich M., Atanasov A. G. (2018b). Ethnopharmacology—A bibliometric analysis of a field of research meandering between medicine and food science? Front. Pharmacol. 9:215. 10.3389/fphar.2018.00215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yeung A. W. K., Mocan A., Atanasov A. G. (2018c). Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food: a bibliometric analysis of the most cited papers focusing on nutraceuticals and functional foods. Food Chem. 269, 455–465. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yoon D. Y., Yun E. J., Ku Y. J., Baek S., Lim K. J., Seo Y. L. (2013). Citation classics in radiology journals: the 100 top-cited articles, 1945–2012. Am. J. Roentgenol. 201, 471–481. 10.2214/AJR.12.10489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang J., Yu Q., Zheng F., Long C., Lu Z., Duan Z. (2016). Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: a case study of patient adherence research. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67, 967–972. 10.1002/asi.23437 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES