Significant interactions may occur between the “immune and nervous systems in the gut”; which include glia, intrinsic and extrinsic neurons, and various immune cells located in close proximity to one another.1 The complex interactions between these cells and how they are involved in gastrointestinal physiology and disease remain understudied. Among the variety of cell types, enteric glia may represent a “new research frontier in neurogastroenterology” and a novel clinical target in functional gastrointestinal disorders and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).2 Findings reported by McClain et al 3 as well as a recent study by Rao et al4 have indicated that enteric glia are required for normal intestinal motility and that, in the context of inflammation, glia convert to a “reactive glial phenotype” that is associated with neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, and exaggerated neurogenic contractions and may contribute to IBD, enteric infections, postoperative ileus, motility disorders, and functional gastrointestinal disorders.2 Reactive enteric glia may be a pivotal player in neuroinflammation, motor disorders, and visceral abdominal pain associated with these disorders, but the precise mechanisms involved are not well understood. In this issue of Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Delvalle et al5 further probe the role of tachykinins in neuroinflammation in the gut, with a specific focus on how intercellular neuron-glia signaling is linked to neuroinflammation and dysmotility.
Tachykinins are neuropeptides expressed in enteric neurons of the gut and extrinsic nerve fibers from the dorsal root and vagal ganglia. Tachykinins are important excitatory transmitters in gut neural reflexes and they interact with the following tachykinin/neurokinin receptors (NKRs): NK1R, NK2R, and NK3R. Release of substance P, a member of the tachykinin neuropeptide family, is known to contribute to neurogenic inflammation. Although tachykinin activation of NK2Rs on enteric glia via is thought to be involved in enteric nervous system (ENS) dysfunction in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS),6 the neural–glial mechanisms involved are not well understood. In this issue of Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Delvalle et al5 defined a previously unrecognized signaling interaction between enteric neurons, extrinsic sensory neurons, and enteric glia that is mediated by NK2R and transient-receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1). Elegant imaging studies in intact myenteric ganglia of reporter mice expressing a Ca2+ sensor to monitor Ca2+ waves provides proof that NK2Rs drive responses in neuronal varicosities that propagate to enteric glia and neurons via a connexin-43–dependent pathway. The study goes on to show that blockade of NK2R signaling can enhance recovery from colitis and alter the development of a reactive glial phenotype. Next-generation RNA sequencing analysis in enteric glia identified the inflammation-induced reactive glial transcriptome signature and showed that NK2R blockade alters the development of this signature.
An important breakthrough reported in this study was that neurokinin A activates TRPV1-positive nociceptors via NK2Rs to drive glial and neural network activity in the ENS. The novel NK2–TRPV1 neural–glial–nociceptive pathway is a potential target for both visceral pain and inflammation in IBD. As highlighted in the article,5 enteric glia are central to IBD-associated enteric neuroinflammation. The studies showed that enteric glia links neuronal TK2Rs and TRPV1R. Ultimately, restoring normal enteric glial cell function may provide an effective strategy to combat inflammation, protect the ENS, prevent abnormal motility, and perhaps provide analgesia. The pathway is potentially relevant in IBD, IBS, and motility disorders, and, possibly, in some CD patients in remission who continue to experience pain.
The sensitization of TRPV1 on visceral afferent nociceptive nerve terminals is deemed to be an important mechanism of visceral hypersensitivity. H1-mediated sensitization of TRPV1 was shown to mediate visceral hypersensitivity and symptoms in IBS patients. Ebastine, an H1 antagonist, reduced visceral hypersensitivity, gastrointestinal symptoms, and abdominal pain in IBS patients.7 In this regard, a key question arising from the study by Delvalle et al5 is whether neurokinin A can induce NK2-mediated sensitization of the TRPV1 sensory neurons in the neural glial pathway to cause pain?
Tachykinins are implicated in motility disorders and studies have indicated that NK2R antagonists may inhibit the hypermotility associated with intestinal inflammation, infection, or stress, and this may occur without any constipating effect.8 The study by Delvalle et al5 suggested that neuron–glia signaling may be the target of NK2R antagonist drugs to restore motility and attenuate colitis by dampening the effects of tachykinins operating in a complex immune regulatory circuit to amplify inflammation in IBD.
More effective drug treatments are needed to treat gastrointestinal disorders, particularly those that cause abdominal pain. With respect to tachykinin drugs in clinical trials, NK1R antagonist drugs did not show significant analgesic activity and failed to get approval for use to treat pain.9 They also showed variable efficacy as anti-inflammatory drugs. In models of gut inflammation–induced hypersensitivity, NK2R antagonists reduced abdominal pain (cramps) and postoperative ileus,10 and are promising experimental drugs for IBS.11, 12 In a small phase 2 study, the selective NK2R antagonist ibodutant was shown to improve pain severity in diarrhea-predominant IBS. A larger phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 559 patients showed a dose-dependent improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms and abdominal pain in female diarrhea-predominant IBS.11 In this regard, the study by Delvalle et al5 has advanced our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the beneficial actions of NK2R antagonists. Future studies in IBS models exploring the neural NK2/TRPV1–glial connexin-43–dependent purinergic signaling pathways at the level of the ENS, sensory nerves, and enteric glia to block abdominal pain and gastrointestinal dysfunction offer exciting possibilities.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest The author discloses no conflicts.
Funding Research support was provided by National Institutes of Health grant R01 DK113943-01, funds from a Dean’s grant from the College of Medicine, and research development funds from the Department of Anesthesiology.
References
- 1.Yoo B.B., Mazmanian S.K. The enteric network: interactions between the immune and nervous systems of the gut. Immunity. 2017;46:910–926. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ochoa-Cortes F., Turco F., Linan-Rico A., Soghomonyan S., Whitaker E., Wehner S., Cuomo R., Christofi F.L. Enteric glial cells: a new frontier in neurogastroenterology and clinical target for inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:433–449. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McClain J., Grubišić V., Fried D., Gomez-Suarez R.A., Leinninger G.M., Sévigny J., Parpura V., Gulbransen B.D. Ca2+ responses in enteric glia are mediated by connexin-43 hemichannels and modulate colonic transit in mice. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:497–507. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.10.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rao M., Rastelli D., Dong L., Chiu S., Setlik W., Gershon M.D., Corfas G. Enteric glia regulate gastrointestinal motility but are not required for maintenance of the epithelium in mice. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:1068–1081. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Delvalle N.M., Dharshika C., Morales-Soto W., Fried D.E., Gaudette L., Gulbransen B.D. Communication between enteric neurons, glia, and nociceptors underlies the effects of tachykinins on neuroinflammation. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;6:321–344. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Delvalle-Dorta N.M., Rivera-Lopez G., Gulbransen B. Tachykinin activation on enteric glia: a novel mechanism of enteric nervous system dysfunction in irritable bowel syndrome. FASEB J. 2016;30:1. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wouters M.M., Balemans D., Van Wanrooy S., Dooley J., Cibert-Goton V., Alpizar Y.A., Valdez-Morales E.E., Nasser Y., Van Veldhoven P.P., Vanbrabant W., Van der Merwe S., Mols R., Ghesquière B., Cirillo C., Kortekaas I., Carmeliet P., Peetermans W.E., Vermeire S., Rutgeerts P., Augustijns P., Hellings P.W., Belmans A., Vanner S., Bulmer D.C., Talavera K., Vanden Berghe P., Liston A., Boeckxstaens G.E. Histamine receptor H1-mediated sensitization of TRPV1 mediates visceral hypersensitivity and symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:875–887. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Evangelista S. Involvement of tachykinins in intestinal inflammation. Curr Pharm Des. 2001;7:19–30. doi: 10.2174/1381612013398446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bernardazzi C., Pêgo B., de Souza H.S. Neuroimmunomodulation in the gut: focus on inflammatory bowel disease. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:1363818. doi: 10.1155/2016/1363818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bueno L., Fioramonti J. Visceral perception: inflammatory and non-inflammatory mediators. Gut. 2002;51:i19–i23. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.suppl_1.i19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Camilleri M., Ford A.C. Pharmacotherapy for irritable bowel syndrome. J Clin Med. 2017;6:E101. doi: 10.3390/jcm6110101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Corsetti M., Akyuz F., Tack J. Targeting tachykinin receptors for the treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders with a focus on irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:1354. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]