Skip to main content
Royal Society Open Science logoLink to Royal Society Open Science
. 2018 Aug 29;5(8):181138. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181138

Effects of amendments on heavy metal immobilization and uptake by Rhizoma chuanxiong on copper and cadmium contaminated soil

Yanluo Xie 1,, Kemeng Xiao 1,, Yang Sun 1, Yufeng Gao 1, Han Yang 1, Heng Xu 1,
PMCID: PMC6124074  PMID: 30225089

Abstract

An improved method was applied for remediating cadmium and copper co-contaminated soil and reducing the metal concentration in Rhizoma chuanxiong. Pot experiments were conducted with six amendments (composed with bentonite, phosphate, humic acid, biochar, sepiolite powder, etc.). The results showed that soil pH, biological activities (soil enzymatic activities and microbial counts) and R. chuanxiong biomass were greatly improved with the addition of amendments in all treatments, especially in T3 and T6. Also, amendments effectively decreased the concentration of malondialdehyde and H2O2 in R. chuanxiong. In the T3 treatment, the bio-available Cd and Cu in soil were significantly decreased by 0.53 and 0.41 mg kg−1, respectively. Meanwhile, the amendment in T3 reduced Cd and Cu accumulation in R. chuanxiong about 45.83 and 39.37%, respectively, compared to T0. Moreover, the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy spectra showed the surface functional groups of every amendment. To conclude, this study offers an effective and environmental method to reduce metal accumulation in R. chuanxiong on heavy metal co-contaminated soil.

Keywords: amendments, Rhizoma chuanxiong, Cd–Cu contaminated soil, accumulation

1. Introduction

With the development of industrialization, urbanization and construction, heavy metals have generated several serious environmental problems. Heavy metals such as aluminium (Al), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd) and chromium (Cr) are easy to transfer into soil and water, which will pose extreme toxicity to plants and aquatic organisms [1,2]. For example, Cd absorbed by plant through rhizospheres will inhibit reactive oxygen species (ROS)-detoxifying enzymes, thus affecting plant growth [3]. The high concentration of heavy metals will seriously threaten humans' health through the food chain [4,5]. Xu et al. [6] found that people at high risk of HIV had higher blood concentrations of metals including Cd, Pb and mercury (Hg) compared to those with low risk of HIV. Besides, Cu will lead to the generation of ROS that will damage cellular constituents, reducing growth and yield of plants [3]. Moreover, combined pollution with various metals has become the main form of heavy metal pollution in soil. Therefore, the study of remediating heavy metal-contaminated soil attracts more and more attention all over the world.

Rhizoma chuanxiong (Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort, Umbelliferae), the dried rhizome of the Umbelliferae plant species R. chuanxiong Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort, is one of the most popular and oldest herbal medicines in the world [7]. Rhizoma chuanxiong has been used for thousands years in traditional Chinese, Japanese and Korean folk medicine [8], and applied to the prescriptions of angina pectoris [9], hypertension [10], ischaemic stroke [11], etc. In addition, R. chuanxiong has attracted many researchers' attention owing to the ability of accumulating heavy metals. For example, Li et al. [12] found that the accumulation capacity of R. chuanxiong to Cd and Cu was more remarkable, especially to Cd, compared to Pb and Hg. Up to now, there are only few reports about the methods of reducing metal uptake by R. chuanxiong. Therefore, to ensure the safe use of R. chuanxiong, it is of key significance to reduce heavy metal concentration in R. chuanxiong.

Many methods have been applied to reduce the availability of heavy metal in soil and plants, including physical, chemical and biological methods. Chemical immobilization is to decrease the concentration of dissolved contaminants by sorption [13], which will decrease metal availability to plants [14]. Soil amendments, such as organic matter, and phosphate, can reduce the solubility of metals in soil [14]. The method in this experiment was to add amendments into soils, which not only provided nutrition for plants, but also reduced the bioavailability of heavy metals.

Bentonite clays is a cost-effective amendment for stabilization of heavy metals in soil owing to its isomorphic substitution, permanent negative charges at surfaces as well as its environmental compatibility and ready availability [1517]. Phosphate (i.e. KH2PO4, CaH2PO4 and H3PO4), one of the most common amendments [18], could reduce the availability of heavy metals and provide nutrition for crops [19]. Hence, bentonite and phosphate are preferable materials to immobilize heavy metals and promote plant growth. Biochar is introduced as soil amendments to stabilize or passivate heavy metals in the contaminated soils and improve quality of polluted soil [20]. Humic acid has both directly or indirectly positive effects on plant growth and health [21]. Silicon fertilizer has a lot of advantages for plant growth in metal-contaminated soils such as reducing metal uptake, increasing root growth biomass and so on [22]. Biological matrix can improve utilization efficiency of organic carbon and promote immobilization of organic carbon [23].

The main objectives of this experiment were to: (i) investigate reduction in metal concentration in R. chuanxiong by applying different amendments; (ii) evaluate remediation efficiency of amendments by estimating malondialdehyde (MDA), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and metal accumulation in R. chuanxiong coupled with the variety of soil quality (pH, soil enzymatic activity and respiration, microbial counts and metals bioavailability); and (iii) explore the correlation between soil pH, the content of available heavy metals in soil and accumulation of heavy metals in R. chuanxiong.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Pot experiments

In this study, soils were collected from the campus of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, where a remotely experimental site has been applied for scientific research about heavy metals for many years. The collected soil samples were air-dried and passed through a 2 mm sieve, then homogenized adequately for uniform distribution of heavy metals and other substrates. The soil basic prosperities are given in table 1, and the concentrations of Cd and Cu in soils were about 8.9 and 164.2 mg kg−1, relatively. The components of amendments were bought from Tianjing Environmental Protection Monitoring Station, China.

Table 1.

Basic properties of the soil in this experiment.

properties values
pH 6.5
cation exchange capacity (CEC, cmol kg−1) 12.1
sand (0.006–2 mm) (%) 68.1
clay (less than 0.002 mm) (%) 6.2
silt (0.0002–0.06 mm) (%) 25.7
organic content (g kg−1) 16.8
Cd (mg kg−1) 8.9
Cu (mg kg−1) 164.2

Plastic pots (height 13 cm and diameter 20 cm) were used for this experiment. After air-drying, soil samples (2 kg) were mixed with 1.5% of amendments (w/w). The amendments mostly consisted of bentonite and phosphate, and the experiment set seven experimental groups with three replicates, including six groups (T1–T6) added amendments and a group with (T0) non-addition as a control (table 2). Two plants of R. chuanxiong (bought from Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences) were planted in each pot, then cultivated from August to November with an average temperature of 25°C indoors.

Table 2.

Composition and proportion of amendments in T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6.

treatment composition proportion
T1 bentonite : phosphate : humic acid : biochar 58% : 2% : 2% : 38%
T2 bentonite : phosphate : biochar : silicon fertilizer 85% : 3% : 7% : 5%
T3 bentonite : phosphate : biological matrix : compost 40% : 17% : 26% : 17%
T4 bentonite : phosphate : biological matrix : silicon fertilizer 40% : 15% : 25% : 20%
T5 bentonite : phosphate : humic acid : biochar 50% : 15% : 15% : 20%
T6 sepiolite powder : biochar : dolomite powder : KH2PO4 40% : 30% : 20% : 10%

Approximately three months later, R. chuanxiong were harvested successively and washed with deionized water, then wet weights were recorded. Rhizoma chuanxiong were dried at 60°C for 3 days in an oven.

2.2. pH of soils

One gram of air-dried soil was weighed in a 5 ml breaker, and added to 2.5 ml of deionized water without CO2 [24]. The solution was stood for 30 min and measured by pH meter (SevenCompact-s210).

2.3. Soil biological activities

Soil samples were collected from each pot after R. chuanxiong was harvested to estimate soil enzyme activities and bacteria counts. The measurement of dehydrogenase was through a spectrophotometer as described by Zhou et al. [25] with minor modifications by prolonging the reaction time to 48 h. Activities of fluorescein diacetate (FDA) hydrolysis, urease, acid phosphatase and invertase were assayed by the methods of Adam & Duncan [26], Yan [27], Alef & Nannipieri [28] and Gu [29], respectively. Dehydrogenase activity was determined spectrophotometrically at 492 nm and expressed as microgram triphenylformazan (TPF) per soil per hour. FDA activity was determined spectrophotometrically at 490 nm and presented as the content of fluorecien in dry soil (µg g−1). The activity of urease was spectrophotometrically determined at 578 nm and presented as mg NH4+ g−1 soil. The activity of invertase was determined spectrophotometrically at 508 nm and presented as milligram glucose per gram soil per 24 h. Bacterial counts in soil were counted on LB agar medium through the spread-plate method as described by Liu et al. [30].

2.4. Heavy metals analysis

Heavy metals in R. chuanxiong and soil samples was detected by atomic absorption spectroscopy (VARIAN, SpecterAA-220Fs) as described by Wu et al. [31]. Dried powdered and sieved samples of 0.2 g soil and plant were digested by HCLO4 (5 : 4 : 3, v/v/v).

The soil samples were collected to measure metal bioavailability by a toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) and 0.01 M CaCl2 extraction [32,33]. Two grams of air-dried sieved (2 mm) soil were added to 40 ml of 0.11 mol l−1 HAc at pH 2.88 ± 0.05 and shaken for 18 h. Then the solution was filtered with a 0.45 µm filter membrane for Cd and Cu analysis. At room temperature (about 25°C), 2.5 g of air-dried soil samples were incubated for 3 h in a shaker at 250 rpm with 12.5 ml of 0.1 mol l−1 CaCl2. Then the solution was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min and filtered with a 0.45 µm filter membrane. All the extraction was determined by flame atomic absorption spectrometry.

2.5. Malondialdehyde determination

According to the method of Liu et al. [30] with some modifications, R. chuanxiong tissues (1 g) were ground with 2 ml of 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and quartz sand, then homogenized with 8 ml of 10% TCA. The absorbance was determined at 450, 532 and 600 nm. MDA was quantified with equation (2.1):

MDA concentration(μmoll1)=6.45×(OD532OD600)0.56×OD450. 2.1

2.6. H2O2 determination

H2O2 determination was conducted following the steps of the hydrogen peroxide reagent kit from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, China, and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm with spectrophotometry.

2.7. Fourier transform infrared spectra amendment assay

The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of amendments prepared as KBr discs were recorded in a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum 100 Model Infrared Spectrophotometer to examine functional groups of amendments [34]. FTIR spectra were recorded in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 at a resolution of 2 cm−1.

2.8. Data analysis

The mean and standard deviation of the three replicates were calculated in this study. Statistical significance was performed through using one-way ANOVA in SPSS 17.0, and the mean values were compared using the least significant difference calculated at a significant level of p < 0.05. All figures were performed by using Origin 8.5 software. Also, SPSS version 21.0 for Win was used to reflect the multivariate linear relationship among contaminated soil physicochemical characteristic, microbial abundance and metal fractions.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Soil pH change

The pH values of soil with different treatments at the end of the experiment are shown in figure 1. The soil pH increased compared to the initial pH (pH = 7.93), except for T3 (pH = 7.77) and T6 (pH = 7.87), but there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) among T0, T3 and T6. T2 presented the highest increase in soil pH. Bentonite which was the same component in all amendments had a positive effect on soil pH [35], therefore causing the slight increase in soil pH in this experiment.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Effects of soil pH with different amendments. pH of soils with different treatments after R. chuanxiong was harvested. Error bar represents the standard deviation of three samples. Columns denoted by different lowercase letters (a, b, c) indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among different treatments. T0, treatment without amendment; T1–T6, treatments with different amendments.

3.2. Analysis of metal availability

TCLP is always used for heavy metal leached fraction concept [33] and CaCl2 extraction can remove metals by ion exchange with Ca2+ and/or complexation with the chloride species [32]. In this experiment, bio-available metals were extracted by TCLP and CaCl2 extraction methods. It could be observed that the available metals (Cu, Cd) decreased compared with T0, especially for Cd extraction by CaCl2 (figure 2). For example, CaCl2-extracted Cd in T6 was too small to detect. The CaCl2-extracted Cd in T3 and T4 both decreased from around 1.34 to 0.5 mg kg−1 and showed a significant decrease of about 0.84 mg kg−1, compared to other treatments. The order of CaCl2 extracting Cd in soils was T4 < T3 < T5 < T1 < T2, T6 as exceptional data. In the T3 treatment, the immobilization effect on Cu was also excellent with the decrease rate of 78.67% in CaCl2-extracted Cu. The order of CaCl2 extractable Cu from soils was T6 < T3 < T1 < T5 < T4 < T2, while the order of TCLP extracting Cu was T6 < T3 < T5 < T1 < T2 < T4. Above all, with the least content of available heavy metals, T6 showed the best immobilized effect on heavy metals.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Effects of heavy metal availability in soil. Available metals in soil with different treatments after R. chuanxiong was harvested. Error bar represents the standard deviation of three samples. Columns denoted by different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d) and capital letter (A, B) indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among different treatments. T0, treatment without amendment; T1–T6, treatments with different amendments.

Many studies have documented a negative correlation between soil pH and heavy metal availability [36]. The increase in pH in this experiment can benefit precipitation and sorption of heavy metals. Besides, some compositions of amendments, such as bentonite [37], phosphate [38], had strong adsorption capacity towards heavy metals, consequently reducing the toxicity of heavy metals.

3.3. Microbial counts and respiration intensity of soil

The microbial counts including bacteria and fungi counts and soil respiration are shown in figure 3a. It could be observed that bacterial counts had a slight increase in all treatments compared to T0 (log6.12 CFU g−1 soil). Bacterial counts in T3 (log6.89 CFU g−1 soil) increased most, followed by T4 (log 6.72 CFU g−1 soil) compared to T0. Also, the highest and lowest fungi number were presented in T3 (log 5.50 CFU g−1 soil) and T0 (log5.11 CFU g−1 soil), respectively. On the whole, the number of microbes increased after the immobilization process, indicating that the addition of amendments contributed to soil micro-environment improvement.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Effects of microbial activities in soil. Microbial counts including bacterial and fungi (a) and soil respiration (b) from different treatments. Error bar represents the standard deviation of three samples. Columns denoted by different lowercase letters (a, b, c) in bacterial counts and capital letter (A) in fungi counts indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among different treatments. T0, treatment without amendment; T1–T6, treatments with different amendments.

The respiration intensity of soil is shown in figure 3b. It was clear that the respiration intensity in T6 (0.45 CO2mg g−1 dried soil 24 h−1) was around three times that of T0 (0.14 CO2mg g−1 dried soil 24 h−1); meanwhile, the respiration intensity of T3 (0.28 CO2mg g−1 dried soil 24 h−1) and T4 (0.22 CO2mg g−1 dried soil 24 h−1) were both almost two times more than in T0. Besides, the respiration intensity in other treatments also increased more or less.

The available heavy metals decreased, which reduced the environmental stress to microbes. Thus, the microbial counts and respiration intensity increased. Soil bacterial and fungal population were significantly and positively correlated with soil organic matter [39]. Amendments in this experiment provided amount of organic matter that could be used by microbes, which might be a reason for the microbial counts increase. For example, biological matrix (mainly straw powder), one of the same components of amendments in T3 and T4, could motivate soil microbial activity owing to the richness of N, P, K and trace elements [40]. Besides, other components also have a positive effect on microbial activity. For example, biochar in T1, T2, T5 and T6 could improve soil aeration through enhancing oxygen (O2) diffusion, thereby stimulating aerobic activity in soil [41].

3.4. Soil enzymatic activities

The activity of dehydrogenase in soil is shown in figure 4a. Dehydrogenase activity showed different degrees of increase in all treatments compared to T0 (262.46 mg TPF g−1). It indicated that a light fluctuation happened in T2 (326.69 mg TPF g−1) and T4 (278.65 mg TPF g−1). Also, T3 and T6 presented the largest activities of dehydrogenase, about 472.86 and 461.90 mg TPF g−1, respectively.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Effects of soil enzymatic activities. Enzymatic activities of soils with different treatments after R. chuanxiong was harvested. (a) Dehydrogenase activity, urease activity; (b) invertase activity, FDA activity. Error bar represents the standard deviation of three samples. Columns denoted by different lowercase letters (a, b, c) indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among different treatments. T0, treatment without amendment; T1–T6, treatments with different amendments.

For urease activity, there was no significant difference (p < 0.05) among all treatments with comparison to T0. But higher activity presented in T3, T4 and T6 (all above 300 mg NH4–N g−1) compared to T2 (just about 190 mg NH4–N g−1) (figure 4a).

Invertase activity is by far less sensitive to heavy metals than dehydrogenase and urease [42]. Yet, it was observed that a significant change arose in this experiment (figure 4b). The highest activity of invertase presented in T3 and T6, in specifically, about 108 and 112 mg glucose g−1, respectively, both of which were four times than that of T0 (27 mg glucose g−1). Compared to T0, invertase activity increased to approximately 50 glucose g−1 in T1, and nearly 70 mg glucose g−1 in T4. The activities of invertase in T2 and T5 increased slightly, compared to the control.

The activity of FDA presented increased trends with the addition of amendments compared to T0 (figure 4b). More concretely, higher FDA activity presented in T3, T4 and T6 treatments, which were around two times greater than the activity in T0. Besides, the FDA activity showed a slight increase in T1, T2 and T5 in comparison to the control.

The increase in soil enzymatic activities cooperated with the increase in soil microbes [39,43]. With the reduction in heavy metal toxicity, microbial activity increased as a result of enzymatic activity increasing. Besides, the addition of amendments improved soil physicochemical properties, such as high cationic exchange capacity of bentonite [44], and phosphate increasing extractable soil inorganic P [45]. Above all, it was obvious that amendments in T3, T4 and T6 showed a more positive effect on enzymatic activity.

3.5. Biomass of Rhizoma chuanxiong

To evaluate the effect of amendments on the growth of R. chuanxiong in metal-contaminated soil, biomass of R. chuanxiong was recorded (figure 5). Compared to T0, the growth of R. chuanxiong was promoted in every treatment. Moreover, the biomass of R. chuanxiong in T3 was five times that of T0, and the growth in T1 was the least among treatments. These results indicated amendments played a positive role in the growth of R. chuanxiong in polluted soil.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Effects of R. chuanxiong biomass. Biomass of R. chuanxiong in different treatments. Error bar represents the standard deviation of three samples. Columns denoted by different lowercase letters (a, b, c) indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among different treatments. T0, treatment without amendment; T1–T6, treatments with different amendments.

The amendment provided nutrition for plants and adjusted soil pH, which could be propitious to R. chuanxiong growth. Meanwhile, plant biomass increase, in turn, can dilute the account of heavy metals with a ‘dilution effect’ [46]. The results in this experiment indicated that application of amendments could promote R. chuanxiong growth.

3.6. Heavy metal concentrations in Rhizoma chuanxiong

The concentrations of Cd and Cu in R. chuanxiong are presented in figure 6. On the whole, metals declined in R. chuanxiong with the addition of amendments compared to T0. Especially in the T3 treatment, the contents of Cd and Cu showed the remarkable declining rates by 45.83% and 39.37%, respectively. It was interesting that metal uptake by plants had a different tendency as enzymatic activity and microbial biomass. The difference between T3 and T6 on metal availability in soil and metal concentration in plants might indicate that the amendment in T3 had a more positive influence on reduction in metal bioavailability in soil and uptake by plants. Besides, although the amendment of T6 could immobilize metals, it had little effect on preventing plants uptake in this study. The difference of metal availability in soil and plant between T3 and T6 could be explained as follows. It could be observed that the bentonite in T3 and sepiolite powder in T6 had the same proportion of amendments, about 40%. The sepiolite powder had greater specific surface area and greater ion exchange capacity, while montmorillonite as the main component of the bentonite had low crystallinity values [47], which made the sepiolite powder have a stronger adsorption capacity to heavy metals. Thus, the available heavy metals in T6 were less than those in T3. However, the sepiolite powder was rich in Mg2+ and Ca2+ [48] whose concentrations in soil had a positive relation to the accumulation of heavy metal in plants. Therefore, the concentrations of Cd and Cu in R. chuanxiong in T3 were lower than those in T6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Effects of heavy metal concentration in R. chuanxiong. Metal concentrations with different treatments after R. chuanxiong was harvested. Error bar represents the standard deviation of three samples. Columns denoted by different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e) indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among different treatments. T0, treatment without amendment; T1–T6, treatments with different amendments.

The phenomena about the reduction in heavy metal concentrations in R. chuanxiong might be explained as follows: (i) the reduction in available heavy metals made it difficult for metals to enter the plant; (ii) amendments used in this experiment were full of organic matter which played an important role in retaining soil Cd and in decreasing its availability to plants through cation exchange capacity (CEC) [49]. As Marchand et al. researched [50], soil organic matter is pivotal for controlling metal (e.g. Fe, Cu and Pb) bioavailability from strong organometallic complexes. For example, in the research of Sun et al. [51], bentonite can reduce metal exchangeable fraction, in alkaline soils, resulting the decrease in metal bioavailability; (iii) some research indicated that phosphate could reduce metal dissolution and transport from contaminated soil by increasing the efficiency of metal-phosphate mineral formation, then precipitating [52]; and (iv) the better effect on decreasing metal availability in soil and uptake by R. chuanxiong in T3 might indicate the biological matrix and compost was better for bentonite and phosphate on immobilizing metals.

3.7. Antioxidant stress of Rhizoma chuanxiong

H2O2 is one of the ROS molecules which is formed upon incomplete reduction in oxygen [53]. The overproduction of H2O2 may lead to cell death and oxidative damage [54]. MDA is produced from cell membrane peroxidation [55]. The metals can increase the concentration of H2O2 and MDA in plants [56]. Thus, the production of H2O2 and MDA can indicate metal stress on plants [57].

The concentrations of H2O2 and MDA are shown in figure 7. Compared to T0, there was a decreased tendency but no significant difference on H2O2 and MDA with the application of amendments among all treatments. MDA decreased by 12.83–54.34% and H2O2 decreased by 13.33–57.54% in all treatments. It proved that all treatments presented positive effects on reduction in H2O2 and MDA levels in R. chuanxiong, compared to T0.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Effects of antioxidant system in R. chuanxiong. MDA and H2O2 concentration of R. chuanxiong in different treatments. Error bar represents the standard deviation of three samples. Columns denoted by different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d) indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among different treatments. T0, treatment without amendment; T1–T6, treatments with different amendments.

Environmental stress, such as salinity, temperature extremes and high metal contamination, could decrease the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and increase the activities of catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) [5860]. Because SOD disproportionates O2 to produce H2O2, H2O2 could be decomposed to H2O and O2 catalysed by CAT [57]. So, the amendment decreased the contents of available metals in soil, thus reducing the toxicity of heavy metals to plants. Then, the environmental stress on plants reduces, thereby reducing the values of H2O2 and MDA in R. chuanxiong.

3.8. The Fourier transform infrared spectra amendments

The results of FTIR are shown in figure 8. The absorption band that appeared at 3620 cm−1 might detect the inner hydroxyl groups [61], and it was not observed in T6. Besides, the absorption of 2856 cm−1 are ascribed to stretching vibration of methylene (−CH2) groups in antisymmetric and asymmetric [62], which are mainly obvious in T1, T3 and T6. The sorption bands at 1499 and 1465 cm−1 expressed the C–H bend from CH2 and C–O bend from carboxylate ions, and the P = O from phosphate, C–O–P and P–O–P were absorbed at 1241, 1197 and 1148 cm−1 [6365]. The bands below 500 cm−1 represent the Ca = Ca torsion, C–OH3 torsion of the methoxy group and ring torsion of phenyl [66]. The vibrations at near 3620, 2856, 1465, 1128 and 1035 cm−1 might indicate that –OH, –NH2, –CH2 and phosphate were related to the immobilization and complexation progress of Cd and Cu. Moreover, compared to T6, the vibration of 1241, 1197, 1148, 1074 cm−1 and below 500 cm−1 might imply that P=O, C–O–P, P–O–P, the Ca=Ca torsion, C–OH3 torsion of the methoxy group and ring torsion of phenyl were involved in metals (Cd, Cu) uptake by R. chuanxiong.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

FTIR of all amendments in different treatments.

4. Conclusion

In the present study, the addition of amendments reduced the bioavailability of heavy metals and concentration in R. chuanxiong. Also, the amendments slightly improved soil pH, and soil biological activities (enzymatic activities, microbial counts). In all kinds of treatments, T3 and T6 showed a better effect on reducing metal availability in soils, which indicated that the recipes of amendment in T3 and T6 are more suitable to immobilizing Cd and Cu, compared to other treatments; whereas, amendment of T1 and T3 appeared to work better to reduce metal concentration in R. chuanxiong. In summary, results from this experiment declared that the amendment in T3 was the best treatment to reduce soil metal toxicity and concentration in R. chuanxiong. This experiment provided an effective and environmentally friendly pathway to remediate heavy metal-contaminated soil in situ.

Acknowledgements

The authors also wish to thank Professor Guanglei Cheng from Sichuan University for the technical assistance.

Data accessibility

This article does not contain any additional data.

Authors' contributions

Y.X. and K.X. carried out the whole laboratory work including amendments researching, pot experiments, data analysis, participated in the design of this study and drafted the manuscript; Y.S. carried out the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript; Y.G. and H.Y. participated in the pot experiment and collected the data; H.X. conceived of the study, designed the experiment, coordinated the study and help draft the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Science and Technology Support Program of Sichuan Province (2016NZ0050), the Agricultural Science and Technology Achievements Transformation Program of Sichuan Province (2017NZZJ008), the Key Research and Development Program of Sichuan Province (2017SZ0188, 2017SZ0181, 2018NZ0008), the National Science and Technology Supporting Program (2015BAD05B01-5) and the Science and Technology Supportive Project of Sichuan Province (2017RZ0063).

References

  • 1.Metcalfe TL, Dillon PJ, Metcalfe CD. 2008. Effects of formulations of the fungicide, pentachloronitrobenzene on early life stage development of the Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). Chemosphere 71, 1957–1962. ( 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.12.018) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Khalid S, Shahid M, Niazi NK, Murtaza B, Bibi I, Dumat C. 2016. A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. J. Geochem. Explor. 182, 247–268. ( 10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.11.021) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mustafa G, Komatsu S. 2016. Toxicity of heavy metals and metal-containing nanoparticles on plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1864, 932 ( 10.1016/j.bbapap.2016.02.020) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhou H, Zhou X, Zeng M, Liao BH, Liu L, Yang WT, Wu YM, Qiu QY, Wang YJ. 2014. Effects of combined amendments on heavy metal accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) planted on contaminated paddy soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 101, 226–232. ( 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.01.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chanda D, Sharma GD, Jha DK, Hijri M. 2017. Tolerance of microorganisms in soil contaminated with trace metals: an overview. In Recent advances in applied microbiology (ed. P Shukla). Singapore: Springer.
  • 6.Xu X, Hu H, Hong YA. 2017. Body burden of heavy metals among HIV high risk population in USA. Environ. Pollut. 220, 1121–1126. ( 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.023) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li W, Tang Y, Chen Y, Duan J. 2012. Advances in the chemical analysis and biological activities of chuanxiong. Molecules 17, 10 614–10 651. ( 10.3390/molecules170910614) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brown PN. 2012. Book Reviews: Chromatographic fingerprint analysis of herbal medicines: thin-layer and high performance liquid chromatography of Chinese drugs. Herbalgram.
  • 9.Chan S, Jones RG. 2009. Synergistic interaction between the Ligusticum chuanxiong constituent butylidenephthalide and the nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside in relaxing rat isolated aorta. J. Ethnopharmacol. 122, 308–312. ( 10.1016/j.jep.2009.01.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hou YZ, Zhao GR, Yuan YJ, Zhu GG, Hiltunen R. 2005. Inhibition of rat vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation by extract of Ligusticum chuanxiong and Angelica sinensis. J. Ethnopharmacol. 100, 140–144. ( 10.1016/j.jep.2005.01.051) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang X, Zeng X, Wu T. 2010. Chuanxiong preparations for preventing stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 65, CD006765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xiao-Nian LI, Chen X. 2010. Exploration of the source of heavy metal elements accumulated in a famous-region drug Rhizoma chuanxiong in Sichuan Province. Medicinal Plant. 10, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Basta NT, Mcgowen SL. 2004. Evaluation of chemical immobilization treatments for reducing heavy metal transport in a smelter-contaminated soil. Environ. Pollut. 127, 73–82. ( 10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00250-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Khan MJ, Azeem MT, Jan MT, Perveen S. 2012. Effect of amendments on chemical immobilization of heavy metals in sugar mill contaminated soils. Soil Environ. 31, 55–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shen YH. 2001. Preparations of organobentonite using nonionic surfactants. Chemosphere 44, 989–995. ( 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00564-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tica D, Udovic M, Lestan D. 2011. Immobilization of potentially toxic metals using different soil amendments. Chemosphere 85, 577–583. ( 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.06.085) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Allen BL, Hajek BF. 1989. Mineral occurrence in soil environments. Mammal Rev. 28, 1–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sun L, Wu Q, Liao K, Yu P, Cui Q, Rui Q, Wang D. 2015. Contribution of heavy metals to toxicity of coal combustion related fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in Caenorhabditis elegans with wild-type or susceptible genetic background. Chemosphere 144, 2392–2400. ( 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.028) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen S, Xu M, Ma Y, Yang J. 2007. Evaluation of different phosphate amendments on availability of metals in contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 67, 278–285. ( 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.06.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang X, Wang H, He L, Lu K, Sarmah A, Li J, Bolan NS, Pei J, Huang H. 2013. Using biochar for remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals and organic pollutants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 20, 8472–8483. ( 10.1007/s11356-013-1659-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang L, Sun XY, Tian Y, Gong XQ. 2014. Biochar and humic acid amendments improve the quality of composted green waste as a growth medium for the ornamental plant Calathea insignis. Sci. Hortic. 176, 70–78. ( 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.06.021) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Adrees M, Ali S, Rizwan M, Zia-Ur-Rehman M, Ibrahim M, Abbas F, Farid M, Qayyum MF, Irshad MK. 2015. Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of heavy metal toxicity in plants: a review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 119, 186–197. ( 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.05.011) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nsabimana D, Haynes RJ, Wallis FM. 2004. Size, activity and catabolic diversity of the soil microbial biomass as affected by land use. Appl. Soil Ecol. 26, 81–92. ( 10.1016/j.apsoil.2003.12.005) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zheng J, et al. 2017. Biochar compound fertilizer increases nitrogen productivity and economic benefits but decreases carbon emission of maize production. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 241, 70–78. ( 10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.034) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhou Z, Chen Y, Liu X, Zhang K, Xu H. 2015. Interaction of copper and 2,4,5-trichlorophenol on bioremediation potential and biochemical properties in co-contaminated soil incubated with Clitocybe maxima. Rsc Adv. 5, 42 768–42 776. ( 10.1039/C5RA04861C) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Adam G, Duncan H. 2001. Development of a sensitive and rapid method for the measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 943–951. ( 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00244-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yan J, Quan G, Ding C. 2013. Effects of the combined pollution of lead and cadmium on soil urease activity and nitrification. Proc. Environ. Sci. 18, 78–83. ( 10.1016/j.proenv.2013.04.011) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Alef K, Nannipieri P. 1995. Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry, pp. 569–576. New York, NY: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gu Y, Wang P, Kong CH. 2009. Urease, invertase, dehydrogenase and polyphenoloxidase activities in paddy soil influenced by allelopathic rice variety. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 45, 436–441. ( 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.06.003) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu H, Guo S, Jia Z, Han Y, He Q, Xu H. 2015. Alleviating the toxicity of heavy metals by combined amendments in cultivated bag of Pleurotus cornucopiae. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 17 182–17 191. ( 10.1007/s11356-015-4941-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wu B, Chen R, Yao Y, Gao N, Zuo L, Xu H. 2015. Mycoremediation potential of Coprinus comatus in soil co-contaminated with copper and naphthalene. RSC Adv. 5, 67 524–67 531. ( 10.1039/C5RA12763G) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Peters RW. 1999. Chelant extraction of heavy metals from contaminated soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 66, 151–210. ( 10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00010-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chiang KY, Huang HJ, Chang CN.. 2007. Enhancement of heavy metal stabilization by different amendments during sewage sludge composting process. J. Environ. Eng. Manage. 17, 249–256. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ikhtiyarova GA, Özcan AS, Gök Ö, Özcan A. 2012. Characterization of natural- and organo-bentonite by XRD, SEM, FT-IR and thermal analysis techniques and its adsorption behaviour in aqueous solutions. Clay Miner. 47, 31–44. ( 10.1180/claymin.2012.047.1.31) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Houben D, Pircar J, Sonnet P. 2012. Heavy metal immobilization by cost-effective amendments in a contaminated soil: effects on metal leaching and phytoavailability. J. Geochem. Explor. 123, 87–94. ( 10.1016/j.gexplo.2011.10.004) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zeng F, Ali S, Zhang H, Ouyang Y, Qiu B, Wu F, Zhang G. 2011. The influence of pH and organic matter content in paddy soil on heavy metal availability and their uptake by rice plants. Environ. Pollut. 159, 84–91. ( 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.09.019) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Putro JN, Santoso SP, Ismadji S, Ju YH. 2017. Investigation of heavy metal adsorption in binary system by nanocrystalline cellulose—bentonite nanocomposite: improvement on extended Langmuir isotherm model. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 246, 166–177. ( 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.03.032) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Seshadri B, et al. 2017. Potential value of phosphate compounds in enhancing immobilization and reducing bioavailability of mixed heavy metal contaminants in shooting range soil. Chemosphere 184, 197–206. ( 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.172) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bansal OP, Singh G, Katiyar P. 2014. Effect of untreated sewage effluent irrigation on heavy metal content, microbial population and enzymatic activities of soils in Aligarh. J. Environ. Biol. 35, 641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Han XZ, Zhu LQ, Yang MF, Qi YU, Bian XM. 2012. Effects of different amount of wheat straw returning on rice growth, soil microbial biomass and enzyme activity. J. Agro-Environment Sci. 31, 2192–2199. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sun Z, Bruun EW, Arthur E, Jonge LWD, Moldrup P, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Elsgaard L. 2014. Effect of biochar on aerobic processes, enzyme activity, and crop yields in two sandy loam soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 50, 1087–1097. ( 10.1007/s00374-014-0928-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hu XF, Jiang Y, Shu Y, Hu X, Liu L, Luo F. 2014. Effects of mining wastewater discharges on heavy metal pollution and soil enzyme activity of the paddy fields. J. Geochem. Explor. 147, 139–150. ( 10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.08.001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Corstanje R, Schulin R, Lark RM. 2007. Scale-dependent relationships between soil organic carbon and urease activity. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 58, 1087–1095. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00902.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vasconcelos ACFD. 2016. Bentonite application in the remediation of copper contaminated soil. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 11, 1218–1226. ( 10.5897/AJAR2015.10722) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ross DJ, Speir TW, Kettles HA, Mackay AD. 1995. Soil microbial biomass, C and N mineralization and enzyme activities in a hill pasture: influence of season and slow-release P and S fertilizer. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 1431–1443. ( 10.1016/0038-0717(95)00069-Q) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Xiao K, Li Y, Sun Y, Liu R, Li J, Zhao Y, Xu H. 2017. Remediation performance and mechanism of heavy metals by a bottom-up activation and extraction system U using multiple biochemical materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 30 448–30 457. ( 10.1021/acsami.7b09520) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Legido JL, Medina C, Mourelle ML, Carretero MI, Pozo M. 2007. Comparative study of the cooling rates of bentonite, sepiolite and common clays for their use in pelotherapy. Appl. Clay Sci. 36, 148–160. ( 10.1016/j.clay.2006.06.014) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Alver BE, Sakici M, Yörükoğullari E, Yilmaz Y, Güven M. 2008. Thermal behavior and water adsorption of natural and modified sepiolite having dolomite from Turkey. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 94, 835–840. ( 10.1007/s10973-008-9032-0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Haghiri F. 1974. Plant uptake of cadmium as influenced by cation exchange capacity, organic matter, zinc, and soil temperature. J. Environ. Qual. 3, 180–183. ( 10.2134/jeq1974.00472425000300020021x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Marchand C, Mench M, Jani Y, Kaczala F, Notini P, Hijri M, Hogland W. 2018. Pilot scale aided-phytoremediation of a co-contaminated soil. Sci. Total Environ. 618, 753–764. ( 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.143) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sun Y, Li Y, Xu Y, Liang X, Wang L. 2015. In situ stabilization remediation of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) co-contaminated paddy soil using bentonite. Appl. Clay Sci. 105–106, 200–206. ( 10.1016/j.clay.2014.12.031) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mcgowen SL, Basta NT, Brown GO. 2001. Use of diammonium phosphate to reduce heavy metal solubility and transport in smelter-contaminated soil. J. Environ. Qual. 30, 493 ( 10.2134/jeq2001.302493x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.D'Autréaux B, Toledano MB. 2007. ROS as signalling molecules: mechanisms that generate specificity in ROS homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 813–824. ( 10.1038/nrm2256) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gadjev I, Stone JM, Gechev TS. 2008. Chapter 3: Programmed cell death in plants: new insights into redox regulation and the role of hydrogen peroxide. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 270, 87–144. ( 10.1016/S1937-6448(08)01403-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sairam RK, Chandrasekhar V, Srivastava GC. 2001. Comparison of hexaploid and tetraploid wheat cultivars in their responses to water stress. Biol. Plantarum 44, 89–94. ( 10.1023/A:1017926522514) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Valavanidis THV. 2007. Heavy-metal effects on lipid peroxidation and antioxidant defence enzymes in mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis. Chem. Ecol. 23, 361–371. ( 10.1080/02757540701653285) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li Q, Liang Z, Ge F, Xu Y, Yang L, Zeng H. 2014. Alleviating CTAC and Flu combined pollution damage in Chlorella vulgaris by exogenous nitric oxide. Chemosphere 96, 39–45. ( 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.07.012) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Raza SH, Athar HR, Ashraf M, Hameed A. 2007. Glycinebetaine-induced modulation of antioxidant enzymes activities and ion accumulation in two wheat cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 60, 368–376. ( 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.12.009) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wise RR, Naylor AW. 1987. Chilling-enhanced photooxidation: evidence for the role of singlet oxygen and superoxide in the breakdown of pigments and endogenous antioxidants. Plant Physiol. 83, 278–282. ( 10.1104/pp.83.2.278) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Song A, Li Z, Zhang J, Xue G, Fan F, Liang Y. 2009. Silicon-enhanced resistance to cadmium toxicity in Brassica chinensis L. is attributed to Si-suppressed cadmium uptake and transport and Si-enhanced antioxidant defense capacity. J. Hazard. Mater. 172, 74–83. ( 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.143) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Madejová J. 2003. FTIR techniques in clay mineral studies. Vib. Spectrosc. 31, 1–10. ( 10.1016/S0924-2031(02)00065-6) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Viudez AJ, Madueño R, Teresa Pineda A, Blázquez M. 2006. Stabilization of gold nanoparticles by 6-mercaptopurine monolayers. Effects of the solvent properties. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 17 840–17 847. ( 10.1021/jp062165l) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Singh BR, Fuller MP. 1991. FT-IR in combination with the attenuated total reflectance technique: a very sensitive method for the structural analysis of polypeptides. Appl. Spectrosc. 45, 1017–1021. ( 10.1366/0003702914336174) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Nivens DE, Schmit J, Sniatecki J, Anderson T, Chambers JQ, White DC. 1993. Multichannel ATR/FT-IR spectrometer for on-line examination of microbial biofilms. Appl. Spectrosc. 47, 668–671. ( 10.1366/0003702934067171) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gendreau RM. 1982. Breaking the one second barrier: fast kinetics of protein adsorption by FT-IR. Appl. Spectrosc. 36, 47–49. ( 10.1366/0003702824638962) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Schulz H, Baranska M. 2007. Identification and quantification of valuable plant substances by IR and Raman spectroscopy. Vib. Spectrosc. 43, 13–25. ( 10.1016/j.vibspec.2006.06.001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This article does not contain any additional data.


Articles from Royal Society Open Science are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES