Abstract
Recently reported DNA nanoflowers are an interesting class of organic-inorganic hybrid materials which are prepared using DNA polymerases. DNA nanoflowers combine the high surface area and scaffolding of inorganic Mg2P2O7 nanocrystals with the targeting properties of DNA, whilst adding enzymatic stability and enhanced cellular uptake. We have investigated conditions for chemically modifying the inorganic core of these nanoflowers through substitution of Mg2+ with Mn2+, Co2+ or Zn2+ and have characterized the resulting particles. These have a range of novel nanoarchitectures, retain the enzymatic stability of their magnesium counterparts and the Co2+ and Mn2+ DNA nanoflowers have added magnetic properties. We investigate conditions to control different morphologies, DNA content, hybridization properties, and size. Additionally, we show that DNA nanoflower production is not limited to Ф29 DNA polymerase and that the choice of polymerase can influence the DNA length within the constructs. We anticipate that the added control of structure, size and chemistry will enhance future applications.
INTRODUCTION
State-of-the art materials with increasingly sophisticated properties are at the forefront of scientific research and modern technology. Hybrid materials aim to merge the best properties of the biological, organic and inorganic components, whilst instilling new functionality not otherwise possible (1). By coupling biological and inorganic materials it is possible to overcome their associated limitations such as instability and lack of biocompatibility (2). For example, hybrid materials that combine magnetic materials with biological components have found a wide range of biomedical applications (3,4). They can be directed to a particular location using an external magnetic field to deliver therapeutics (5,6), used to generate heat locally (7) or combined with biological molecules such as antibodies, enabling magnetic capture and isolation of materials (8). Alternatively, magnetic materials can be combined with enzymes to produce enzyme nanogels which are stable, catalytically active, and can be readily recovered and reused (9).
DNA nanoflowers (DNFs) are an interesting example of inorganic hybrid materials that combine DNA and Mg2P2O7 in hierarchically structured materials with flower shaped morphology. DNFs are prepared enzymatically by rolling circle amplification (RCA) in which a DNA polymerase repeatedly traverses a circular DNA template synthesizing a long strand of DNA which then self-assembles (10,11). Incorporation of nucleotides during RCA releases pyrophosphate, which co-crystallizes with both the growing DNA and Mg2+ ions present in the amplification buffer (Figure 1) (12). A similar phenomenon also occurs during rolling circle transcription which is analogous to RCA, giving similar materials termed RNA microsponges (MSs) (13). In principle, DNFs and RNA MSs combine the structure and stability of Mg2P2O7 with the biological and programmable advantages of DNA or RNA. These have already shown potential in a number of applications, including the targeted delivery of chemotherapeutics by encoding aptamers into the DNA product (10,11), the delivery of miRNA for gene inhibition (13,14), cellular delivery of proteins (15), the delivery of DNAzymes (16), as immunostimulators (17), and in the immobilization and catalytic enhancement of enzymes (18).
Figure 1.
The self-assembly of DNFs using DNA polymerase enzymes. The grey circle represents a cyclic DNA template and the splint that is elongated is shown in yellow.
Research aimed at tailoring the functions of these hybrids has focused on the organic components and includes: encoding functionality through the template (19), incorporating dye modified triphosphates (11,20), adding biologically relevant proteins (15,18), hybridization with dye-functionalized nucleic acids (14), condensing the structures with polycations (20) and intercalating drugs such as doxorubicin (10). We envisaged that by altering the inorganic component it would be possible to harness additional functionalities. Metal phosphates and pyrophosphates have been used in catalysis (21–24), electrochemical detection (25), as electrodes (26), and in supercapacitors (27). They also have multiple potential biomedical applications in therapeutics (28), as artificial bone and tooth scaffolds (29), as MRI contrast agents (30), and as photoluminescent probes (31). Altering the metal ion component of the pyrophosphate salts could therefore potentially expand the versatility and applicability of DNFs. Indeed, a similar strategy was very recently reported for preparing manganese and cobalt DNFs (32). Herein, we expand on the published study by identifying and evaluating variables to manipulate size, alter the morphology, and tailor the DNA content of the particles. We show for the first time that it is possible to prepare zinc DNFs and that DNF preparation is not limited to Ф29 DNA polymerase. We have also investigated the surface potential and hybridization properties of Mn, Co, Zn, and Mg particles, and demonstrate their stability towards enzymatic degradation. In addition, we describe, for the first time, the magnetic properties and structure of one such bio-inorganic hybrid, and show that it is possible to manipulate such materials with an external magnetic field.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
General methods, protocols for the synthesis of oligonucleotides and cyclization of templates, details for the preparation of each type of DNF described in the manuscript, and protocols for analytical techniques are given in the Supplementary Information. Sequences of oligonucleotides used in this study are given in Table 1.
Table 1.
Sequences of oligonucleotides used in this study. HPLC traces and mass spectra for oligonucleotides used in RCA are shown in the Supplementary Information. P represents a 5′ phosphate
| Name | Sequence |
|---|---|
| Template 1 (T1) | 5′-PTATAGCCCATGTGCTGCTGCTGCAGCGATACGCGTATCGCTATGGCATATCGTACGATATGCCGCAGCAGCATTACCGTCGTT-3′ |
| Template 2 (T2) | 5′-PATAGTGAGTCGTATTAGCTCGAGCTCGAGCAGCCGCGCCCTACCCTATCCCTCCCCTCGCGGCTGCTCGAGCTCGAGCATCCCT-3′ |
| Splint 1 (S1) | 5′-GCACATGGGCTATAAACGACGGTAA-3′ |
| Splint 2 (S2) | 5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAT-3′ |
| Match probe | 5′-TTACCGTCGTTTATAGC-Cy3-3′ |
| Mismatch probe | 5′-GTTGTCACTTAGTCCTA-Cy3-3′ |
Investigating conditions for DNF formation
Before starting the experiment, 200 mM buffer stock solutions were prepared for the following: Tris pH 7.0, Tris pH 7.5, Tris pH 8.0, Tris pH 8.5, Tris pH 9.0, PIPES pH 7.5, HEPES pH 7.0, HEPES pH 7.5. 66.6 mM, 50 mM, 40 mM, 33.3 mM and 16.7 mM stock solutions of MnCl2, CoCl2 and ZnCl2 in MilliQ water.
Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase
The buffer stock solution (2 μl) and the divalent cation stock solution (6 μl) were added to a 200 μl PCR tube. An enzyme stock solution composed of T4 ligase cyclized T1 (0.5 μM), S1 (1 μM), dNTPs (3.33 mM), ammonium sulphate (16.7 mM), KCl (83.3 mM), 0.17% Tween 20 and Bst 2.0 (0.27 U/μl) in water was then prepared, adding the enzyme last. The solution was quickly vortexed and 12 μl was rapidly added to each PCR tube. The tubes were mixed by vortexing and incubated at 61.5°C for 14 h followed by 85°C for 20 min before rapidly cooling to 4°C. The tubes were centrifuged and the supernatant analysed by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. Any precipitates that formed were washed 3 times with H2O, suspended in 20 μl of H2O and 7.5 μl of the samples were analysed by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. The samples were then imaged by SEM if DNA was detected.
Ф29 DNA polymerase
The buffer stock solution (5 μl) and the divalent cation stock solution (6 μl) were added to a 200 μl PCR tube. An enzyme stock solution composed of T4 ligase cyclized T1 (0.67 μM), S1 (1.33 μM), dNTPs (4.44 mM), ammonium sulphate (22.2 mM), DTT (8.89 mM), and Ф29 (0.57 U/μl) in water was then prepared, adding the enzyme last. It was necessary to omit the DTT for the CoCl2 and ZnCl2 experiments. The solution was quickly vortexed and 9 μl was rapidly added to each PCR tube. The tubes were mixed by vortexing and incubated at 30°C for 20 h followed by 65°C for 10 min before rapidly cooling to 4°C. The tubes were centrifuged and the supernatant analysed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Any precipitates that formed were washed 3 times with H2O, and suspended in 20 μl of H2O. 7.5 μl of the samples were analysed by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. The samples were then imaged by SEM if DNA was detected.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Manganese DNA nanoflowers
Divalent manganese has similar chemical and biochemical behaviour to magnesium, and many DNA polymerases, including Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase (Bst) at 65°C or Ф29 DNA polymerase (Ф29), remain functional when Mg2+ cations in their active sites are replaced with Mn2+ (33,34). Unlike Mg2+, Mn2+ has five unpaired d electrons giving rise to magnetic properties. Consequently, we anticipated preparing manganese DNFs (MnDNFs) that could be manipulated by a magnetic field whilst still maintaining the desirable features of their magnesium counterparts (MgDNFs), such as large surface area, nanoscale dimensions, and enzymatic stability.
To test this, we replaced all Mg2+ sources present during MgDNF preparation with Mn2+ via MnCl2 and investigated using both Bst and Ф29. Despite being reported to catalyse RCA with reasonable DNA yield (35), Bst has not previously been used in the preparation of any DNFs, and we first determined whether Bst could be used to produce MgDNFs. We found that it could, providing the buffer has a final Mg2+ concentration of 15 mM or greater (SEM images are given in the SI, Figure S1).The published approach for preparing MgDNFs uses a cyclic DNA template made by T4 ligase-mediated circularization of a linear DNA strand in the RCA step without its isolation from the ligation mixture. As such, all components present in the buffer including Mg2+ are carried forward (10,19). T4 ligase, which requires Mg2+, was substituted with CircLigase II which uses Mn2+ as its cofactor. After addition of a primer to the CircLigase II ligation mixture, the sample was used in RCA reactions catalysed by Bst at 65°C or Ф29 at 30°C (Figure 2). In the amplification step we adopted the recommended buffer compositions, but replaced the Mg2+ sources with MnCl2. The final amplification buffer for the Bst catalyzed RCA contained 3.25 mM MnCl2 and had a mixture of Tris buffer (pH 8.8) and Tris-acetate buffer (pH 7.5) as a carryover from the ligation step. Similarly, the Ф29 buffer contained 11.25 mM MnCl2 and was a mixture of the CircLigase II Tris-acetate buffer (pH 7.5) from the ligation step and Tris buffer (pH 7.5).
Figure 2.
Initial method for the synthesis of MnDNFs. Scale bar represents 1 μm.
Fortunately both polymerases produced a precipitate, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis revealed that these materials had hierarchical morphology (Figure 2). There was a clear difference between the two samples; Bst produced discrete particles with a size range of 3.6 ± 1.2 μm (number of particles counted (n) = 90; Supplementary Figure S2) whereas the Ф29 RCA product appeared softer with thick sheets and a broad size range (Supplementary Figure S3). In addition, agarose gel analysis indicated that the precipitate prepared using Ф29 incorporated DNA whereas those prepared using Bst did not (Supplementary Figure S4). Therefore, we suspected that the different morphologies are linked to the presence or absence of DNA.
Variables for controlling morphology and DNA levels within the DNFs
Three main differences were identified between the Bst and Ф29 RCA reactions: Mn2+ concentration, pH and temperature. We hypothesized that one or a combination of these factors controlled DNA levels within MnDNFs, and screened different RCA conditions, aiming to identify variables that control both DNA levels and particle size distribution. Due to the cost associated with CircLigase II, T4 ligase was used to cyclize the DNA template for subsequent experiments. In addition, purified cyclic templates were used in these experiments, removing any potential batch-to-batch variability associated with the efficiency of enzymatic ligation, and the cyclic product was desalted thoroughly before use, removing any Mg2+ remaining from the ligation buffer. Both Bst and Ф29 were investigated in the pH range of 7.0–9.0 with Mn2+ concentrations between 5 and 15 mM (Full details are given in the SI). After RCA, the reaction tubes were centrifuged and the supernatants were analysed to evaluate RCA efficiency (Supplementary Figures S6 and S8). Precipitates were washed with water, agarose gel electrophoresis was used to identify the presence of DNA (Supplementary Figures S5 and S7) and selected products were imaged by SEM. For direct comparison between MnDNFs and MgDNFs, the experiments were repeated using MgSO4 (Supplementary Figures S9–S12).
Gel-electrophoresis analysis of the supernatants revealed that long extended DNA strands were produced by both polymerases during Mn2+ RCA, with Bst becoming more processive with increasing pH whereas the efficiency of Ф29 was reduced at the higher pH. Interestingly, although the main DNA component present in the particles was too long to migrate out of the well of the gel, the Ф29 precipitates also contained a second band between the 10 kb marker and the well of the gel. This band was also present in the supernatant. This agrees with previous reports and is likely to be a double stranded amplification product (36). This band was not observed during Bst catalysed RCA.
SEM imaging revealed that Mn2+ concentration has a striking effect on particle morphology (Figure 3A). At 5 mM, Bst-mediated RCA produced large shell-like particles with a layered structure and average length of 16 μm. At 10 mM, smaller particles of ∼1.5 μm in size begin to form in a mesh, and sonication yielded individual small NF particles. At 15 mM, MnDNFs with morphology similar to the reported MgDNFs were formed (10,11,15). These had similar size (∼2.5 μm) and morphology to the precipitate formed in the earlier experiments using Bst with the CircLigase II cyclized template, albeit with a narrower distribution (Table 2). Increasing the Mn2+ concentration further resulted in a large mesh formed of sheets (Supplementary Figure S13). A similar trend in morphology was observed for the material produced by Ф29. At 5 mM large particles formed with a layered structure but more square than those produced by Bst, the average longest length of these particles was 9 μm. At 10 mM Mn2+, Ф29 produced particles with an average diameter ∼1.3 μm which resemble the particles produced by Bst at 15 mM Mn2+ and the previously reported MgDNFs (10,11,15). Increasing the concentration of Mn2+ further resulted in much smaller particles ∼300 nm in diameter. This pattern in morphology was not observed when using Mg2+; at concentrations below 10 mM, no DNA was detected in any precipitates that formed and at the higher Mg2+ concentration (15 mM) nanoflower structures still formed. This was the case for both polymerases. We also observed that Tris buffer gave particles with narrower size distribution than HEPES buffer (Supplementary Figures S14–S16) and that the concentration of ammonium sulphate did not alter the morphology (Supplementary Figure S17).
Figure 3.
(A) SEM images illustrating the effect of MnCl2 concentration and choice of polymerase on the morphology and size of particles formed during RCA. The Bst RCA incubation time was 14 h at pH 7.5 and the Ф29 incubation time was 20 h at pH 8.0. (B) Fluorescence-based analysis comparing the levels of free DNA and DNA incorporated into the nanoconstructs as a function of enzyme, pH, and cation concentration. Samples were broken down using TBE to release DNA prior to incubation with SYBR gold. A plate reader was then used to compare the DNA levels. The effect of pH on Ф29 RCA was compared at 15 mM MnCl2 and the effect of concentration was evaluated at pH 8.0. The effect of pH on Bst was determined at 15 mM MnCl2 and the effect of concentration was evaluated at pH 7.0.
Table 2.
Average size of particles formed as a function of Mn2+ concentration. The Bst RCA reaction was incubated for 14 h at pH 7.0 whereas the Ф29 pH incubation time was 20 h and the pH was 8.0. Sizes refer to the longest dimension and n refers to the number of particles measured. Analysis was performed using ImageJ. See Supplementary Figures S18–S23 for SEM images used in the analysis
| Enzyme | Concentration (mM) | Size range (μm) | n |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bst | 5 | 15.8 ± 2.7 | 60 |
| 10 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 26 | |
| 15 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 93 | |
| Ф29 | 5 | 8.8 ± 1.2 | 20 |
| 10 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 72 | |
| 15 | 0.312 ± 0.006 | 111 |
To further investigate the effect of pH and Mn2+ concentration of the DNA levels within the particles we used SYBR gold (a fluorescent dye that exhibits high fluorescence enhancement on binding to both single and double stranded DNA) to compare the relative quantities of DNA present in both the supernatants and the precipitates from a fixed RCA volume (Figure 3B). Samples were incubated in Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) buffer overnight to sequester any Mn2+ cations and breakdown any precipitates prior to incubation with the dye and measurement. Using the earlier electrophoresis experiments as a guide, we used a 15 mM concentration of MnCl2 to evaluate the effect of pH. We identified that the pH at which the RCA reaction was conducted strongly affects the DNA levels within the particles and, whilst precipitation was observed for all pH’s when 15 mM Mn2+ was used in the reaction, pH 7.0 resulted in the highest levels of precipitated DNA for both polymerases. Next, we compared the effect of Mn2+ concentration; pH 8.0 was chosen for the Ф29 experiments and pH 7.0 for the Bst experiments. These conditions were chosen based on the earlier gel-electrophoresis results. Here, we observed that both polymerases produced the greatest amount of DNA at the lower Mn2+ concentrations (2–5 mM), and that this was greatly reduced with increasing levels of Mn2+. This is presumably due to the DNA product being trapped within the precipitates, preventing further extension. The same pattern was seen with SYBR green I and SYBR green II (Supplementary Figures S24 and S25), these dyes were used in addition to the universal nucleic acid stain SYBR gold (37) as they display different sensitivities towards nucleic acids; SYBR green I is known to bind double stranded DNA selectively (38,39), and SYBR green II is more sensitive towards single stranded DNA and RNA (40). Interestingly, when compared with Mg2+ (Supplementary Figure S26) higher DNA levels were found for Bst with Mn2+, but Mg2+ gave higher DNA levels with Ф29.
As mentioned above, this study demonstrates that Ф29 can be replaced with Bst in the preparation of MgDNFs providing that the buffer is supplemented with additional Mg2+ and, whilst the morphology remains similar, that the DNA component of the Bst MgDNFs is of shorter length. As with the MnDNFs a second band between the 10 kb marker and the well of the gel was observed for the DNFs produced using Ф29 but not when using Bst, suggesting that Bst does not produce a significant amount of double stranded DNA during RCA (36).
Cobalt DNA nanoflowers
Next we confirmed that Co2+-catalysed RCA also produced DNFs, proving that divalent cations other than Mg2+ and Mn2+ can be used. Co2+ was chosen as it also has unpaired d electrons, so the nanoconstructs should possess magnetic properties, and most DNA polymerases can utilize Co2+ as a cofactor (33). Dithiothreitol (DTT) present in the buffer was found to be incompatible with CoCl2, resulting in a dark precipitate forming instantly on addition of the DTT. In contrast with previous literature, (32) we found it necessary to remove DTT when preparing CoDNFs. We screened different RCA conditions using the approach described above and identified those where nanomaterials were produced (Supplementary Figures S27-S30). Precipitates that were identified as containing DNA by gel electrophoresis were imaged by SEM (Figure 4A and Table 3). We also evaluated DNA levels using the SYBR dyes (Figure 4B, Supplementary Figures S37-S38). DNA was most efficiently incorporated into the nanostructures at pH 7–7.5 for Ф29 and pH 7–8 for Bst. As with Mn2+catalysed RCA, more free DNA is produced at lower metal cation concentrations and more DNA is captured in the precipitates at the higher concentrations (Figure 4B). Interestingly, if the total DNA in the precipitate is combined with the total free DNA our study shows that Ф29 with Co2+ produces more DNA than with Mn2+ or Mg2+. It also indicates that Ф29 has a greater tolerance to higher concentrations of Co2+ than Bst, and this will be the subject of further investigation. Of note, unlike the Mn2+ RCA reactions, the RCA reaction volume greatly altered the morphology of the materials that formed (Figure 4A). The reason for this is not known, and could be linked to the high levels of DNA and precipitate settling.
Figure 4.
A) SEM images illustrating the effect of CoCl2 concentration and reaction scale on the morphology and size of particles formed during RCA at pH 7.0. The Bst RCA incubation time was 14 h whereas the Ф29 incubation time was 20 h. B) Fluorescence-based analysis comparing the levels of free DNA and DNA incorporated into the nanoconstructs as a function of enzyme, pH, and cation concentration. Samples were broken down using TBE to release DNA prior to incubation with SYBR gold. A plate reader was then used to compare the DNA levels. The effect of pH on Ф29 and Bst RCA was determined at 10 mM CoCl2 and the effect of concentration was evaluated at pH 7.0.
Table 3.
Average size and standard deviation of particles formed during Co2+ RCA at pH 7.0. The Bst RCA incubation time was 14 h whereas the Ф29 incubation time was 20 h. Sizes refer to the longest dimension and n refers to the number of particles measured. Analysis was performed using ImageJ. See Supplementary Figures S31-S36 for SEM images used in the analysis
| Enzyme | Scale (μl) | Concentration (mM) | Size range (μm) | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bst | 100 | 10 | 0.79 ± 0.13 | 52 |
| 20 | 15 | 0.210 ± 0.043 | 26 | |
| 1000 | 15 | 6.1 ± 0.7 | 26 | |
| Ф29 | 100 | 10 | 0.446 ± 65 | 108 |
| 20 | 15 | 0.038 ± 0.008 | 176 | |
| 1000 | 15 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 31 |
Zinc DNA nanoflowers
We also evaluated Zn2+ as the cofactor in the preparation of DNFs as Bst has been reported to tolerate Zn2+ (A.K. Vashishtha, J. Wang, and W.H. Konigsberg, unpublished results) (33). Surprisingly, both polymerases produced DNA at the lower Zn2+ concentrations, with Bst showing greater DNA yields (Figure 5B). As with Mn2+, Mg2+ and Co2+ greater DNA levels in the precipitates were observed at higher cation concentrations. SEM analysis revealed that whilst DNA was observed in the precipitates produced at all pHs tested, only the RCA reactions at pH 7.0 produced discrete particles (Figure 5A). Unlike MnDNFs, MgDNFs and CoDNFs these ZnDNFs are much smaller with spherical morphology and it is possible these are amorphous particles formed of Zn2P2O7 and DNA explaining their smaller size and shape.
Figure 5.
(A) SEM images illustrating the effect of ZnCl2 concentration and pH on the morphology and size of particles formed during RCA. The Bst RCA incubation time was 14 h whereas the Ф29 incubation time was 20 h. (B) Fluorescence-based analysis comparing the levels of free DNA and DNA incorporated into the nanoconstructs as a function of enzyme, pH, and cation concentration. Samples were broken down using TBE to release DNA prior to incubation with SYBR gold. A plate reader was then used to compare the DNA levels. The effect of pH on Ф29 RCA was determined at 15 mM ZnCl2 and the effect of concentration was evaluated at pH 8.5. The effect of pH on Bst was determined at 15 mM ZnCl2 and the effect of concentration was evaluated at pH 8.0.
Finally, to determine if the trends in morphology are dependent on the DNA sequence, a second template and splint pair was prepared with a different nucleobase sequence and base composition (Table 1). These were then used in RCA reactions with several of the conditions described earlier in the text. The particles that formed showed a similar trend in morphology and size to those observed with the first template, representative images are shown in the SI (Supplementary Figures S39–S43). In brief, the MnDNFs that formed at 5 mM Mn2+ were large and layered, and increasing the concentration of Mn2+ resulted in the formation of the spherical flower morphology. The CoDNFs also formed petal like structures at 10 mM Co2+ and these were smaller at 15 mM. These results suggest that the morphology depends on the cation concentration to a greater extent than the nucleobase sequence.
Characterization and properties of the nanoflowers
Elemental composition
Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) was used to analyse the elemental composition of the MnDNFs, CoDNFs, and ZnDNFs (Figure 6 and Supplementary Figure S44). This confirmed that the MnDNFs were composed of Mn, P, O, N and C. The CoDNFs were formed of Co, P, O, N and C and the ZnDNFs were composed of Zn, P, O, N and C. We also carried out elemental analysis at different Mn2+ concentrations and the data are given in the SI (Supplementary Figures S45–S48). In agreement with the SYBR gold assay, increasing the concentration of Mn2+ during RCA resulted in precipitates with higher nitrogen content, presumably from the DNA (Supplementary Figure S48). Sulfur was not identified in the MnDNFs formed using HEPES buffer (Supplementary Figures S45–S47), providing evidence that buffer is not incorporated into the nanostructures.
Figure 6.
Exemplar SEM-based EDX characterization of the elemental compositions of the DNFs. EDX data is shown for MnDNFs prepared using Ф29 in Tris buffer pH 8.0, CoDNFs prepared in Tris buffer pH 7.0 and ZnDNFs prepared in Tris buffer pH 7.0. The CoDNFs prepared using a 1 ml RCA volume. Samples were analysed on a carbon support film with a copper mesh to minimize signals from mounting, which is why high carbon levels and copper are detected. See SI Figure S39 for other samples.
Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)
We used FTIR to support our theory that M2P2O7 (where M is a divalent metal cation) form the core of the particles, rather than alternative phosphate derivatives such as M3(PO4)2. The MnDNFs, CoDNFs and ZnDNFs all showed an asymmetric POP bridge stretch (νas POP) at around 900 cm−1 and a symmetric POP bridge (νs POP) stretch at 730 cm−1. The asymmetric vibration modes of the PO3 (νas PO3) gave a strong peak in the region of 1090–1070 cm−1 and the DNFs also show several overlapping broad bands in the region that corresponds to the stretching vibration of water (2800–3800 cm−1) with multiple bending vibrations of H2O (δ H2O) around 1640 cm−1. This suggests that the water molecules associated with the samples are in different environments. Additionally, the infrared (IR) spectrum of the MnDNFs (Supplementary Figure S50) was similar to that of previously published Mn2P2O7.2H2O (41). We then compared the IR spectra with Mn2+ and Co2+ phosphate and pyrophosphate salts, which were prepared by mixing corresponding metal dichloride with buffered pyrophosphate or phosphate based on a literature procedure for the synthesis of hydrated manganese(II) phosphate (Mn3(PO4)2·3H2O) (22). In all cases, the IR spectra matched with the pyrophosphate salts suggesting that the DNFs are composed of a derivative of M2+ with P2O74−, most likely M2P2O7 rather than phosphate salts (Supplementary Figures S50–S58).
Surface potential
The surface potentials of the particles prepared under different conditions were compared using a Malvern Zetasizer Ultra instrument (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). Particles were suspended in 10 mM aqueous NaCl. Due to the limitation of the technique, high quality data could not be obtained for some of the larger particles which have a tendency to settle. As expected, there was a significant degree of correlation between DNA incorporated into the MnDNFs and the magnitude of zeta potential which ranged from: –41.6 mV to –2.5 mV (most to least DNA) (Figure 3, Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). This suggests that the presence of DNA increases the surface charge and stability of the materials. The correlation for the CoDNFs and ZnDNFs, however, was less pronounced. As the surface potential of the particles can be controlled using the methods described in this paper these results will be of importance to other researches developing similar nanostructures for therapeutic applications such as MRI contrast agents or as targeted delivery agents.
Serum stability of DNFs
We next confirmed that the DNA within DNFs retained the high serum stability previously observed for MgDNFs (15). ZnDNFs, CoDNFs and MnDNFs were incubated in cell culture medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and the DNA content was analysed at various time points. FBS was chosen to simulate the extracellular conditions to which a therapeutic oligonucleotide would be exposed and contains predominantly endonucleases. The stability of the DNA in the particles was determined using agarose gel electrophoresis and compared with the stability of free λ-DNA incubated under the same conditions. In all cases, the original morphology of the particles remained intact, even after 48 h (Supplementary Figures S60–S67). Whilst the DNA component of all DNFs proved more stable than the λ-DNA control (Supplementary Figure S59), our data indicates that the smaller particles are more stable to digestion than the larger micron-sized particles. The results also suggest that the CoDNFs are more stable than the MnDNFs. We noticed that after treatment with 10% FBS the particles were less aggregated, one possible explanation for this is that the individual particles may be joined to each other by long DNA strands, and that the naked DNA between the particles is digested.
Magnetic properties of MnDNFs and CoDNFs
We have also investigated the magnetic properties of the MnDNFs and CoDNFs. Previous studies have used isothermal methods to prepare nucleic acid materials that can be manipulated using a magnet but these used folate-labelled primer strands to allow immobilization on streptavidin coated magnetic beads (42,43). Interestingly, the study using RCT shows a TEM image with MgDNF-like structures (43). It is possible that these materials are RNA NFs or MSs formed from magnesium pyrophosphate and RNA with the magnetic particles embedded in the structure, rather than RNA coated magnetic nanoparticles. Unlike the reported studies, the magnetic materials here are prepared during RCA, the constructs are considerably larger, and the approach does not require the use of streptavidin nanoparticles or modified nucleic acids during the preparation. After confirming that the MnDNFs and CoDNFs could be manipulated using a magnet and could be captured on a commercial magnetic rack (Supplementary Figure S68), the low-temperature magnetic properties of the materials were then studied in more detail. The magnetometry data collected on the MnDNFs are shown in Figure 7. While it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions from powder susceptibility in anisotropic systems, some information can be inferred from the data. The mass susceptibility of all MnDNF samples (Figure 7A, main panel) initially increases on cooling in a Curie-Weiss manner. The zero-field cooled (ZFC) and field cooled (FC) curves displayed no noticeable differences, and no clear evidence of magnetic ordering is present down to the lowest temperature measured. The product χT of each material (Figure 7B, main panel) shows a steady value at high temperatures indicating that the compounds are in the paramagnetic phase where temperature fluctuations overcome internal interactions. Variations in χT on cooling are indicative of departures from paramagnetic behaviour, and can be caused by interactions between the spins, or the thermal depopulation of crystal-field split magnetic energy levels. The MnDNFs all exhibit a drop in χT as the temperature is cooled below 100–150 K. This is most likely caused by antiferromagnetic interactions between Mn2+ ions, as observed in several manganese pyrophosphates, including Mn2P2O7 (44–47). The magnetic susceptibility data above T = 50 K was fitted to a Curie-Weiss law and the fitted lines are plotted, along with the data displayed as 1/χ(T) in the inset to Figure 7a. The Curie-Weiss temperatures (ΘCW) determined from the fits are in the range –15 to –21 K and are tabulated in Table 4. This is similar to ΘCW = –13 K found for Mn2P2O7 (44). However, while Mn2P2O7 orders antiferromagnetically at 14 K, none of our MnDNFs exhibit clear signs of long-range magnetic order. Moreover, as temperature is reduced below 7 K the χT for all samples begins to increase. The temperatures of the minima in susceptibility Tmin are recorded in Table 4. This increase in χT points towards the presence of additional ferromagnetic interactions, or the onset of canted antiferromagnetism (also known as weak ferromagnetism), in which the non-colinear arrangement of antiferromagnetically aligned spins gives rise to a net ferromagnetic moment in a particular direction.
Figure 7.
(A) Field-cooled powder magnetic susceptibility χ as a function of temperature of four MnDNF samples taken in an applied dc magnetic field of μ0H = 0.025 T. The inset shows the inverse susceptibility data (symbols) and the associated fits of χ(T) to the Curie-Weiss law (lines). (B) The same data plotted as χT. The inset shows the magnetization measured at T = 1.8 K in the same samples. (C) Zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) powder magnetic susceptibility χ as a function of temperature of a CoDNF sample taken in an applied dc magnetic field of μ0H = 0.025 T. The inset shows the same data plotted as χT in the low-temperature region. CoDNFs prepared using a 1 ml RCA volume with 15 mM CoCl2 were used.
Table 4.
Parameters derived from the magnetic susceptibility data. ΘCW is the Curie–Weiss temperature resulting from fits of χ(T) to the Curie-Weiss law. N is an estimate of the number of spins per gram assuming a high-spin state (S = 5/2 for Mn and 3/2 for Co) and a g-factor of 2. Tmin (Tmax) is the temperature of the minimum (maximum) observed in the χT data
| Sample | Θcw (K) | N (×1021) | T min (K) | T max (K) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ф29 10 mM Mn2+ | −19.3(2) | 2.5 | 6.5(3) | - |
| Ф29 15 mM Mn2+ | −16.4(1) | 1.6 | 6.0(3) | - |
| Bst 10 mM Mn2+ | −15.0(7) | 3.2 | 6.8(1) | - |
| Bst 15 mM Mn2+ | −21.0(3) | 2.2 | 7.1(1) | - |
| Ф29 15 mM Co2+ (1 ml) | −22.2(5) | 5.9 | 10.5(3) | 2.7(1) |
Also shown in Table 4 is an estimate of the number of Mn2+ spins per gram of sample deduced from the Curie-Weiss fit, assuming a high-spin S = 5/2 configuration and a g-factor of 2. The data show that a higher number of spins in the final product is obtained for the samples prepared using 10 mM MnCl2 in the reaction compared to the 15 mM reactions, and that the Bst polymerase yields more spins per mass than the Ф29. These numbers are in good agreement with the results of the EDX analysis shown in Figure 6 and Supplementary Figure S44.
The magnetization of the MnDNFs measured at 1.8 K (inset to Figure 7B) shows a gradual rise and no saturation up to 0.5 T. There is no hysteresis between up and down sweeps of the magnetic field.
The data for the CoDNFs (Figure 7C) show similarities with that of MnDNFs: it exhibits paramagnetic behaviour at high temperatures with a ΘCW = –22.2(5) K; a decrease in χT once the temperature is cooled below 150 K, followed by an increase below Tmin = 10.5(1) K; and a slow non-hysteretic rise in magnetization up to 0.5 K (not shown). However, the CoDNF sample also exhibits a bifurcation of the ZFC and FC susceptibility curves below a temperature of 4 K (Figure 7C, main panel). In addition, χT begins to decrease again below Tmax = 2.7(1) K (Figure 7C, inset). This could indicate the presence of further antiferromagnetic interactions, a reconfiguration of canted spins, or the splitting of the Co2+ spin multiplet. We note that bulk Co2P2O7 displays antiferromagnetic order below 10.1 K (48), which is close to the value of Tmin observed for our CoDNFs. The number of spins per gram shown in Table 4 was estimated assuming S = 3/2 and g = 2 for each Co2+ ion.
In summary, at high temperatures the magnetic data for the MnDNFs and CoDNFs are similar to that for bulk Mn2P2O7 (44) and Co2P2O7 (48), respectively. However, at lower temperatures additional energy scales are present in the DNFs that give rise to changes in χT not observed in the bulk materials. Possible explanations for this observation include: (i) the spins in the DNFs are interacting strongly with or via their surroundings; (ii) although the individual DNFs investigated fall in the size range of 300 nm to 10 μm, the complex nanoscale structure of the flowers leads to non-bulk behaviour; (iii) disorder inherent in the bulk material that makes up the DNF is affecting the spin response; or (iv) the crystal structure of the transition-metal DNFs is not the same as the equivalent diphosphate materials. This is a subject of ongoing investigations.
Hybridization properties
For the DNFs described here to find use in targeted delivery through aptamer incorporation or in bio-separation based applications it is imperative that the DNA component of the DNFs is available to interact with and bind to the intended target. To test this, we evaluated the ability of the different DNFs to selectively hybridize with a complementary oligonucleotide, and compared this to a scrambled base sequence control (Figure 8). The conditions of incubation greatly affected the ability of the DNFs to selectively hybridize and capture the matched sequence over the scrambled control. Incubation of the DNFs with the probes in 200 mM NaCl resulted in the greatest discrimination suggesting that DNFs could find application in magnetic assisted bio-separation or targeted delivery. Our current hypothesis for improved selectivity in saline over water is that NaCl screens the charges of the phosphate backbone in the probe preventing ionic interactions between the inorganic component and the probes, allowing specific base-pairing to dominate relative to non-specific charge-charge interactions. Whilst we expected pH buffering would improve the selectivity, in the majority of cases incubation in PBS resulted in reduced hybridization and it is feasible that PBS reduced hybridization through competitive interactions. Of particular note, the presence of divalent cations resulted in the capture of both the matched and mismatched probes (data not shown). We suspect that the divalent cations lead to non-selective probe capture either by forming salt bridges between the inorganic scaffold and the probes or by interactions through the nitrogen atoms in the DNA bases.
Figure 8.
The ability of different DNFs to hybridize with and capture a complementary DNA strand. DNFs prepared from the equivalent of 20 μl RCA volume were incubated with 100 μl of either 50 nM Cy3 labelled complementary DNA probe (match) or 50 nM of a scrambled version (mismatch) at room temperature for 1 h in the presence of 200 mM NaCl (left) or water (right). The particles were collected by centrifugation and the percentage of probe left in solution was determined using a fluorescence plate reader. Greater selectivity was observed in saline than water, and overall particles prepared using Bst appear to show greater specificity than their Ф29 counterparts.
CONCLUSIONS
We have developed methodology to produce nano- and microscale hybrid DNA-inorganic materials that can be prepared in a range of shapes, show enhanced stability against DNA degradation and can be manipulated using an external magnetic field. These particles can be prepared enzymatically using different divalent cations (Mn2+, Co2+ and Zn2+) which co-crystallize with DNA and pyrophosphate anions, constituting a novel class of materials. By simply altering the composition of the enzyme buffers we show that it is possible to alter the inorganic core of DNFs, control the morphology and size between 40 nm to 16 μm, manipulate the DNA levels within the particles, and alter their surface potential. By changing the polymerase enzyme it is also possible to control the morphology further and vary the length of DNA within the constructs. We have also investigated the magnetic properties of the materials providing insight into the structures of these materials. Finally, we have shown that under certain conditions these structures are capable of selectively binding to their complementary DNA target, and consequently the DNA is free to interact, rather than being tied up in the structures. The tuneable and selective properties of these materials suggests applications in drug delivery, sensing, biocatalysis, energy (as supercapacitors), and separation technologies.
DATA AVAILABILITY
Compositions of enzyme buffers are available on supplier's websites (http://www.lucigen.com/phi29-DNA-Polymerase/ and https://www.neb.com/products/m0537-bst-20-dna-polymerase#Product%20Information_Properties%20and%20Usage). The magnetometry data presented in this paper will be made available at http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/103500.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
SEM work was performed at the Dunn School EM Facility and EDX analysis was performed at the Nanofabrication and Electron Microscopy Facility, Department of Physics, University of Oxford. The magnetometry data presented in this paper was performed at the University of Warwick. The authors would also like to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments in improving the manuscript and Dr Makwana at Malvern Panalytical for assistance with data analysis.
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.
FUNDING
Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2015-005 to Y.B. and T.B.]; UK BBSRC [BB/J001694/2 to A.E.H. and T.B.]; P.G. thanks the University of Oxford for the provision of a visiting lectureship. Funding for open access charge: UK BBSRC [BB/J001694/2].
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1. Sanchez C., Belleville P., Popall M., Nicole L.. Applications of advanced hybrid organic-inorganic nanomaterials: from laboratory to market. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011; 40:696–753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Darder M., Aranda P., Ruiz-Hitzky E.. Bionanocomposites: a new concept of ecological, bioinspired, and functional hybrid materials. Adv. Mater. 2007; 19:1309–1319. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mohammed L., Gomaa H.G., Ragab D., Zhu J.. Magnetic nanoparticles for environmental and biomedical applications: A review. Particuology. 2017; 30:1–14. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Yoo D., Lee J.-H., Shin T.-H., Cheon J.. Theranostic magnetic nanoparticles. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011; 44:863–874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hauser A.K., Wydra R.J., Stocke N.A., Anderson K.W., Hilt J.Z.. Magnetic nanoparticles and nanocomposites for remote controlled therapies. J. Control. Release. 2015; 219:76–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Felfoul O., Becker A.T., Fagogenis G., Dupont P.E.. Simultaneous steering and imaging of magnetic particles using MRI toward delivery of therapeutics. Sci. Rep. 2016; 6:33567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Périgo E.A., Hemery G., Sandre O., Ortega D., Garaio E., Plazaola F., Teran F.J.. Fundamentals and advances in magnetic hyperthermia. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2015; 2:041302. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Iranmanesh M., Hulliger J.. Magnetic separation: its application in mining, waste purification, medicine, biochemistry and chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017; 46:5925–5934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lin M., Lu D., Zhu J., Yang C., Zhang Y., Liu Z.. Magnetic enzyme nanogel (MENG): a universal synthetic route for biocatalysts. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48:3315–3317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Zhu G., Hu R., Zhao Z., Chen Z., Zhang X., Tan W.. Noncanonical self-assembly of multifunctional DNA nanoflowers for biomedical applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135:16438–16445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hu R., Zhang X., Zhao Z., Zhu G., Chen T., Fu T., Tan W.. DNA nanoflowers for multiplexed cellular imaging and traceable targeted drug delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53:5821–5826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Shopsowitz K.E., Roh Y.H., Deng Z.J., Morton S.W., Hammond P.T.. RNAi-microsponges form through Self-Assembly of the organic and inorganic products of transcription. Small. 2014; 10:1623–1633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lee J.B., Hong J., Bonner D.K., Poon Z., Hammond P.T.. Self-assembled RNA interference microsponges for efficient siRNA delivery. Nat. Mater. 2012; 11:316–322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Roh Y.H., Deng J.Z., Dreaden E.C., Park J.H., Yun D.S., Shopsowitz K.E., Hammond P.T.. A Multi-RNAi microsponge platform for simultaneous controlled delivery of multiple small interfering RNAs. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55:3347–3351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kim E., Zwi-Dantsis L., Reznikov N., Hansel C.S., Agarwal S., Stevens M.M.. One-pot synthesis of multiple protein-encapsulated DNA flowers and their application in intracellular protein delivery. Adv. Mater. 2017; 29:1701086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Jin Y., Li Z., Liu H., Chen S., Wang F., Wang L., Li N., Ge K., Yang X., Liang X.-J. et al. Biodegradable, multifunctional DNAzyme nanoflowers for enhanced cancer therapy. NPG Asia Mater. 2017; 9:e365. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Zhang L., Zhu G., Mei L., Wu C., Qiu L., Cui C., Liu Y., Teng I.T., Tan W.. Self-assembled DNA immunonanoflowers as multivalent CpG nanoagents. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015; 7:24069–24074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kim J., Kim D., Lee J.B.. DNA aptamer-based carrier for loading proteins and enhancing the enzymatic activity. RSC Adv. 2017; 7:1643–1645. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lv Y., Hu R., Zhu G., Zhang X., Mei L., Liu Q., Qiu L., Wu C., Tan W.. Preparation and biomedical applications of programmable and multifunctional DNA nanoflowers. Nat. Protoc. 2015; 10:1508–1524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Roh Y.H., Lee J.B., Shopsowitz K.E., Dreaden E.C., Morton S.W., Poon Z., Hong J., Yamin I., Bonner D.K., Hammond P.T.. Layer-by-Layer assembled antisense DNA microsponge particles for efficient delivery of cancer therapeutics. ACS Nano. 2014; 8:9767–9780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Centi G. Vanadyl pyrophosphate - a critical overview. Catal. Today. 1993; 16:5–26. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Jin K., Park J., Lee J., Yang K.D., Pradhan G.K., Sim U., Jeong D., Jang H.L., Park S., Kim D. et al. Hydrated manganese(II) phosphate (Mn3(PO4)2·3H2O) as a water oxidation catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136:7435–7443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Takashima T., Hotori Y., Irie H.. Development of optically transparent water oxidation catalysts using manganese pyrophosphate compounds. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. 2015; 152:139–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kim H., Park J., Park I., Jin K., Jerng S.E., Kim S.H., Nam K.T., Kang K.. Coordination tuning of cobalt phosphates towards efficient water oxidation catalyst. Nat. Commun. 2015; 6:8253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Zhang Z., Zhang Y., Song R., Wang M., Yan F., He L., Feng X., Fang S., Zhao J., Zhang H.. Manganese(II) phosphate nanoflowers as electrochemical biosensors for the high-sensitivity detection of ractopamine. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015; 211:310–317. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Naoaki Y., Shinichi K.. Recent research progress on iron- and manganese-based positive electrode materials for rechargeable sodium batteries. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2014; 15:043501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Pang H., Yan Z., Ma Y., Li G., Chen J., Zhang J., Du W., Li S.. Cobalt pyrophosphate nano/microstructures as promising electrode materials of supercapacitor. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2013; 17:1383–1391. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Fishbane S.N., Singh A.K., Cournoyer S.H., Jindal K.K., Fanti P., Guss C.D., Lin V.H., Pratt R.D., Gupta A.. Ferric pyrophosphate citrate (Triferic™) administration via the dialysate maintains hemoglobin and iron balance in chronic hemodialysis patients. NDT. 2015; 30:2019–2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Wang P., Zhao L., Liu J., Weir M.D., Zhou X., Xu H.H.K.. Bone tissue engineering via nanostructured calcium phosphate biomaterials and stem cells. Bone Res. 2014; 2:14017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Dumont M.F., Baligand C., Li Y., Knowles E.S., Meisel M.W., Walter G.A., Talham D.R.. DNA surface modified gadolinium phosphate nanoparticles as MRI contrast agents. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012; 23:951–957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Doat A., Pellé F., Lebugle A.. Europium-doped calcium pyrophosphates: allotropic forms and photoluminescent properties. J. Solid State Chem. 2005; 178:2354–2362. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Lee J.S., Kim H., Jo C., Jeong J., Ko J., Han S., Lee M.S., Lee H.-Y., Han J.W., Lee J. et al. Enzyme-driven Hasselback-like DNA-based inorganic superstructures. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27:1704213. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Vashishtha A.K., Wang J., Konigsberg W.H.. Different divalent cations alter the kinetics and fidelity of DNA polymerases. J. Biol. Chem. 2016; 291:20869–20875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Saturno J., Lázaro J.M., Blanco L., Salas M.. Role of the first aspartate residue of the ‘YxDTDS’ motif of Ф29 DNA polymerase as a metal ligand during both TP-primed and DNA-primed DNA synthesis. J. Mol. Biol. 1998; 283:633–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Joffroy B., Uca Y.O., Prešern D., Doye Jonathan P.K., Schmidt T.L.. Rolling circle amplification shows a sinusoidal template length-dependent amplification bias. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46:538–545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Ducani C., Bernardinelli G., Högberg B.. Rolling circle replication requires single-stranded DNA binding protein to avoid termination and production of double-stranded DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:10596–10604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Tuma R.S., Beaudet M.P., Jin X., Jones L.J., Cheung C.-Y., Yue S., Singer V.L.. Characterization of SYBR gold nucleic acid gel Stain: a dye optimized for use with 300-nm ultraviolet transilluminators. Anal. Biochem. 1999; 268:278–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Xie L., Cheng H., Qi H., Wang T., Zhao H., Huang G., Du Y.. Nanostructural morphology master-regulated the cell capture efficiency of multivalent aptamers. RSC Adv. 2015; 5:39791–39798. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Ririe K.M., Rasmussen R.P., Wittwer C.T.. Product differentiation by analysis of DNA melting curves during the polymerase chain reaction. Anal. Biochem. 1997; 245:154–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Guan Z., Liu J., Bai W., Lv Z., Jiang X., Yang S., Chen A., Lv G.. Label-free and sensitive fluorescent detection of sequence-specific single-strand DNA based on S1 nuclease cleavage effects. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9:e108401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Brouzi K., Ennaciri A., Harcharras M.. Thermal transformations and infrared studies of Mn2P2O7·2H2O. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2004; 179:1329–1339. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Guo Y., Wang Y., Li S., Niu L., Wei D., Zhang S.. DNA-spheres decorated with magnetic nanocomposites based on terminal transfer reactions for versatile target detection and cellular targeted drug delivery. Chem. Commun. 2017; 53:4826–4829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Guo Y., Li S., Wang Y., Zhang S.. Diagnosis–Therapy integrative systems based on magnetic RNA nanoflowers for Co-drug delivery and targeted therapy. Anal. Chem. 2017; 89:2267–2274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Fowlis D.C., Stager C.V.. Magnetic susceptibility of Mn2P2O7. Can. J. Phys. 1969; 47:371–373. [Google Scholar]
- 45. Adams R.D., Layland R., Payen C.. New manganese pyrophosphates: The syntheses, crystallographic characterizations and magnetic properties of BaMnP2O7 and CaMnP2O7. Polyhedron. 1995; 14:3473–3480. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Krishnamohan Sharma C.V., Chusuei C.C., Clérac R., Möller T., Dunbar K.R., Clearfield A.. Magnetic property studies of manganese−phosphate complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2003; 42:8300–8308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Volkova O.S., Shvanskaya L.V., Ovchenkov E.A., Zvereva E.A., Volkov A.S., Chareev D.A., Molla K., Rahaman B., Saha-Dasgupta T., Vasiliev A.N.. Structure-property relationships in α-,β′-, γ-modifications of Mn3(PO4)2. Inorg. Chem. 2016; 55:10692–10700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Forsyth J.B., Wilkinson C., Paster S., Wanklyn B.M.. The magnetic structure of cobalt diphosphate Co2P2O7. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 1989; 1:169–178. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Compositions of enzyme buffers are available on supplier's websites (http://www.lucigen.com/phi29-DNA-Polymerase/ and https://www.neb.com/products/m0537-bst-20-dna-polymerase#Product%20Information_Properties%20and%20Usage). The magnetometry data presented in this paper will be made available at http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/103500.








