Skip to main content
Molecular Brain logoLink to Molecular Brain
. 2018 Sep 5;11:48. doi: 10.1186/s13041-018-0392-5

Novel and de novo mutations in pediatric refractory epilepsy

Jing Liu 1,2, Lili Tong 1,2, Shuangshuang Song 3, Yue Niu 1,2, Jun Li 1,2, Xiu Wu 1,2, Jie Zhang 4, Celement C Zai 5, Fang Luo 4, Jian Wu 4, Haiyin Li 5, Albert H C Wong 5, Ruopeng Sun 1,2, Fang Liu 2,5, Baomin Li 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6125990  PMID: 30185235

Abstract

Pediatric refractory epilepsy is a broad phenotypic spectrum with great genetic heterogeneity. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) combined with Sanger sequencing could help to understand the genetic diversity and underlying disease mechanisms in pediatric epilepsy. Here, we report sequencing results from a cohort of 172 refractory epilepsy patients aged 0–14 years. The pathogenicity of identified variants was evaluated in accordance with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria. We identified 43 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 40 patients (23.3%). Among these variants, 74.4% mutations (32/43) were de novo and 60.5% mutations (26/43) were novel. Patients with onset age of seizures ≤12 months had higher yields of deleterious variants compared to those with onset age of seizures > 12 months (P = 0.006). Variants in ion channel genes accounted for the greatest functional gene category (55.8%), with SCN1A coming first (16/43). 81.25% (13/16) of SCN1A mutations were de novo and 68.8% (11/16) were novel in Dravet syndrome. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were found in the KCNQ2, STXBP1, SCN2A genes in Ohtahara syndrome. Novel deleterious variants were also found in West syndrome, Doose syndrome and glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome patients. One de novo MECP2 mutation were found in a Rett syndrome patient. TSC1/TSC2 variants were found in 60% patients with tuberous sclerosis complex patients. Other novel mutations detected in unclassified epilepsy patients involve the SCN8A, CACNA1A, GABRB3, GABRA1, IQSEC2, TSC1, VRK2, ATP1A2, PCDH19, SLC9A6 and CHD2 genes. Our study provides novel insights into the genetic origins of pediatric epilepsy and represents a starting-point for further investigations into the molecular pathophysiology of pediatric epilepsy that could eventually lead to better treatments.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13041-018-0392-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Refractory epilepsy, Next-generation sequencing, ACMG scoring

Introduction

Epilepsy is a complex group of chronic brain disorders that are characterized by recurrent spontaneous seizures, and these can often begin in childhood. Repeated and refractory seizures can cause long-term cognitive impairment, decreased social participation and significantly lower quality of life [1, 2]. Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders with 50 to 100 million affected worldwide, and 2 to 4 million new cases diagnosed each year [3].

Epilepsy is a heterogeneous disease with diverse clinical manifestations and causes, including altered ion channel expression, neurotransmitter signaling, synaptic structure, gliosis, and inflammation [1]. Estimates of heritability from twin studies range from 25% to 70% [4, 5]. Although the range of heritability estimates is quite large, disparate studies using varied methods and studying divergent populations are all consistent in concluding that there is a substantial inherited component to epilepsy [6]. Because of this, we sought to investigate the genome in a heterogeneous set of patients with epilepsy and their parents, with the hope that we would identify novel mutations and confirm existing reports of genetic associations with epilepsy. This type of genetic information can provide an entry point into the biology of epilepsy that could eventually lead to new molecular treatment targets.

With the rapid progress of next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, our knowledge of the genetic etiology in many brain disorders such as epilepsy, autism and intellectual disability has expanded greatly [7, 8]. NGS is now capable of efficient and accurate sequencing of entire genomes with small amounts of tissue at ever decreasing costs and has required new approaches to analysing the very large amount of data obtained. For this study, our priority was to separate common and benign genetic variants from those that are likely to be related to the cause of epilepsy, and we chose to apply the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines [911]. The ACMG guidelines classify variants into pathogenic, likely pathogenic, uncertain significance, likely benign, and benign categories based on genetic information that includes population, functional, computational and segregation data. In this study, we investigated 153 epilepsy candidate genes in a cohort of 172 refractory epilepsy pediatric patients. We aimed to provide genetic diagnoses of this patient cohort and explore the genetic etiology of pediatric refractory epilepsy.

Method

Participants

We retrospectively collected and analyzed 172 cases of pediatric refractory epilepsy patients between the ages of 1 day to 14 years old in the Department of Pediatrics of Qilu Hospital, China. The program adhered to guidelines of patients’ consent for participation and research was supported by the Ethics Committee of Qilu hospital, Shandong University (No. 2016(027)).

All patients were examined and diagnosed at the Pediatric Department in Qilu Hospital using a combination of patients’ illness history, previous history, family history, physical examinations, developmental evaluation, hematological examination, ambulatory or video electroencephalography (AEEG/VEEG) monitoring, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), and genetic sequencing. Developmental evaluation included gross motor, fine motor, language, and personal-social skills. The above information was reviewed by two qualified pediatric epileptologists. Seizure types and epilepsy syndromes were diagnosed and classified according to the guidelines of International League Against Epilepsy (2014, 2017) [12, 13].

Next-generation sequencing

Targeted gene capture and sequencing

Blood samples of the patients and their biological parents were collected to test if the mutations were de novo or inherited. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, China).

One hundred fifty-three genes (Table 1) associated with epilepsy were selected by a gene capture strategy, using the GenCap custom enrichment kit (MyGenostics, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The biotinylated capture probes were designed to tile all of the exons without repeated regions. The captured DNAs were eluted, amplified and then their polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were purified with SPRI beads (Beckman, USA). The enriched libraries were sequenced for paired-end reads of 150 bp by Illumina HiSeq X Ten.

Table 1.

One hundred fifty-three epilepsy genes tested in this study by NGS

ADSL CHD2 DHFR GLB1 MAGI2 PNPO SLC9A6
ALDH7A1 CHRNA2 DIAPH3 GLRA1 MAPK10 POLG SPTAN1
ALG13 CHRNA4 DNAJC6 GPR56 MBD5 PPT1 SRPX2
ARG1 CHRNA7 DNM1 GPR98 MDGA2 PROC ST3GAL2
ARHGEF15 CHRNB2 DOCK7 GRIN1 ME2 PRRT2 ST3GAL5
ARHGEF9 CLCN2 EEF1A2 GRIN2A MECP2 RBFOX1 STRADA
ARX CLCN4 EFHC1 GRIN2B MEF2C RBFOX2 STXBP1
ASAH1 CLN3 ELP4 HAX1 MFSD8 RBFOX3 SYNGAP1
ATP13A4 CLN5 EPHB2 HDAC4 MTHFR RELN SYNJ1
ATP1A2 CLN6 ERBB4 HEXA MTOR RYR3 SZT2
ATP1A3 CLN8 FASN HEXB NDE1 SCN1A TBC1D24
ATP6AP2 CNTN5 FLNA HNRNPH1 NEDD4L SCN1B TCF4
ATP7A CNTNAP2 FOLR1 HNRNPU NID2 SCN2A TNK2
BRAF COX6B1 FOXG1 IQSEC2 NRXN1 SCN8A TPP1
BSN CSTB FOXP2 KCNB1 PAFAH1B1 SHANK3 TSC1
CACNA1A CTNNA3 GABBR2 KCNH5 PCDH19 SLC13A5 TSC2
CACNA1H CTSD GABRA1 KCNMA1 PDHA1 SLC19A3 TUBA1A
CACNB4 CYB5R3 GABRA6 KCNQ2 PIGA SLC1A3 UBE3A
CASR DBH GABRB2 KCNQ3 PIGV SLC25A22 VRK2
CDH13 DCX GABRB3 KCNT1 PLCB1 SLC2A1 WDR45
CDH9 DEPDC5 GABRD LGI1 PNKD SLC35A2 ZEB2
CDKL5 DGKD GABRG2 LIAS PNKP SLC46A1

Data analysis and pathogenicity of candidate variants

After sequencing, raw data were saved in FASTQ format. Illumina sequencing adapters and low quality reads (< 80 bp) were filtered by Cutadapt [14]. Clean reads were aligned to UCSC hg19 human reference genome using the Burrows-Wheeler Alignment [15] tool. Duplicated reads were removed using Picard (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard). Insertions, deletions and SNP variants were detected and filtered using the Genome Analysis Toolkit [16]. Then the identified variants were annotated using ANNOVAR [17] and associated with the following databases: 1000 genomes, Exome Aggregation Consortium, The Human Gene Mutation Database, and predicted by Mutation Taster (MT) [18], Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT) [19], PolyPhen-2 (PP2) [20] and Genomic Evolutionary Rate Profiling (GERP++) [21, 22]. Splice-site were predicted by Human Splicing Finder [23]. All variants identified by the Illumina HiSeq X Ten sequencer were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The pathogenicity of mutations was assessed in accordance with American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guideline (ACMG) [911].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS19. The yields of deleterious variants in patients with different onset age or family history were compared using the chi-squared test.

Results

In the current study, we recruited 172 epilepsy pediatric patients, including 23 with Dravet syndrome, ten with Ohtahara syndrome, two with Ohtahara syndrome evolving to West syndrome, ten with West syndrome, two with West syndrome evolving to Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, five with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, four with Doose syndrome, two with epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures, two with epileptic encephalopathy with continuous spike and wave during sleep, and one each with temporal lobe epilepsy, early myoclonic encephalopathy, Landau-Kleffner syndrome, and glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome. Three patients had Rett syndrome, five had tuberous sclerosis complex, and one had Sturge-Weber syndrome. Forty-two patients were diagnosed as unclassified epileptic encephalopathy and 57 patients were diagnosed as unclassified refractory epilepsy due to nonspecific manifestations (Table 2).

Table 2.

Clinical diagnosis in 172 refractory epilepsy and their pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations

Clinical diagnosis Cases P/LP mutations P/LP gene(recurrent no.)
DS 23 16 SCN1A (16)
OS 10 2 KCNQ2 (1), SCN2A (1)
OS-WS 2 1 STXBP1 (1)
WS 10 4 STXBP1 (1), KCNT1 (1), CDKL5 (1), ADSL (1)
WS-LGS 2
LGS 5
EIMFS 2
ECSWS 2
EME 1
LKS 1
UEE 42 8 CACNA1A (1), GABRA1 (1), GABRB3 (1), SCN8A (2), IQSEC2 (1), PCDH19 (1), CHD2 (1)
Doose 4 1 SYNGAP1 (1)
TLE 1
GLUT1-DS 1 1 SLC2A1 (1)
Rett 3 1 MECP2 (1)
TSC 5 5 TSC2 (5)
SWS 1
UE 57 4 VRK2 (1), ATP1A2 (1), TSC (1), SLC9A6 (1)
Total 172 43

P pathogenic, LP likely pathogenic, DS Dravet syndrome, OS Ohtahara syndrome, OS-WS Ohtahara syndrome evolves to West syndrome, WS West syndrome, WS-LGS West syndrome evolves to Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, LGS Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, Doose Doose syndrome, ECSWS epileptic encephalopathy with continuous spike and wave during sleep, EIMFS epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures, TLE temporal lobe epilepsy, EME early myoclonic encephalopathy, LKS Landau-Kleffner syndromes, UEE unclassified epileptic encephalopathy, GLUT1-DS glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome. Rett Rett syndrome, TSC tuberous sclerosis complex, SWS Sturge-Weber syndrome, UE unclassified refractory epilepsy

One hundred fifty-three epilepsy-related genes were selected for sequencing in all patients. The expression pattern of the targeted 153 genes across tissues were analyzed and classified according to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and The Human Protein Atlas (https://www.proteinatlas.org) database (Additional file 1: Table S1). In our 153-gene panel, 51 genes show elevated expression, 14 genes have low expression, and 88 of them exhibit medium levels of expression in brain. The 14 low-expression genes have been associated with epilepsy, including: ARG1 [2427], ARHGEF15 [28], CASR [29, 30], CHRNA2 [31], DBH [3234], DIAPH3 [35], FOLR1 [36, 37], GABRA6 [38, 39], GLRA1 [40, 41], NID2 [42, 43], PROC [44], SLC13A5 [45, 46], SLC19A3 [47], SRPX2 [48]. Specifically, among 51 elevated genes in brain, 4 genes (GABRG2, GABBR2, GABRA1, GRIN1) show restricted brain expression.

The DNA samples of patients were analyzed by using NGS and the variants were validated by Sanger Sequencing. For the samples subjected to targeted sequencing, the quality assurance (QA) /quality control (QC) file are provided in Additional file 1: Table S2.

After sequencing the 153 epilepsy genes, we identified 43 deleterious variants in 23.3% patients (40 of 172), with three children harbouring more than one deleterious variant. Our results were similar to previous reports, with diagnostic yields ranging between 10% and 48.5% [4956]. There were 60.5% (26/43) novel deleterious variants found in our study. A total of 43 variants in 22 genes were scored as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, including SCN1A (16), TSC2 (5), STXBP1 (2), SCN8A (2), TSC1(1), MECP2 (1), CHD2 (1), PCDH19 (1), GABRA1 (1), GABRB3 (1), SLC2A1 (1), SLC9A6 (1), IQSEC2 (1), KCNQ2 (1), SCN2A (1), CACNA1A (1), KCNT1 (1), SYNGAP1 (1), ATP1A2 (1), CDKL5 (1), ADSL (1), VRK2 (1) (Fig. 1a). Among these 43 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, there were 18 (41.9%) missense mutations, 3 (7%) splice site mutations, 11 (25.6%) nonsense mutations, 10 (23.3%) frame-shifts, and 1 (2.3%) deletion mutations (Fig. 1a, Table 3).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Mutated pathogenic or likely pathogenic genes in 172 refractory epilepsy children. a The frequency of mutated genes scored as pathogenic or likely pathogenic adhered to ACMG; b Functional classification of the mutated pathogenic or likely pathogenic genes; c The yield of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants according to the electroclinical phenotype. Abbreviations: DS, Dravet syndrome; OS, Ohtahara syndrome; OS-WS, Ohtahara syndrome evolves to West syndrome; WS, West syndrome; WS-LGS, West syndrome evolves to Lennox-Gastaut syndrome; LGS, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome; Doose, Doose syndrome; ECSWS, epileptic encephalopathy with continuous spike and wave during sleep; EIMFS, epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures; TLE, temporal lobe epilepsy; EME, early myoclonic encephalopathy; LKS, Landau-Kleffner syndromes; UEE, unclassified epileptic encephalopathy; GLUT1-DS, glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome; Rett, Rett syndrome; TSC, tuberous sclerosis complex; SWS, Sturge-Weber syndrome; UE, unclassified refractory epilepsy

Table 3.

Pathogenic and likely pathogenic mutations adhered to ACMG guidelines in 172 refractory epilepsy children

Case code Gene Gene location Transcript cDNA change Protein change SIFT PP2 MT HSF GERP++ MAF-ExAC MAF-KG Parental Origin ACMG scoring ACMG pathogenicity Diagosis
13 SCN1A chr2–166,901,702 NM_006920 c.1513A > T p.K505X A 6.17 (C) De novo PVS1 + PS2 + PM2 LP DS
23 SCN1A chr2–166,854,657 166,854,660 a [101] NM_006920 c.4331_4334del p.E1444fs De novo PVS1 + PS1 + PS2 + PM2 P DS
26 SCN1A chr2–166,870,270 NM_001165963 c.3689T>C p.L1230P D D D 5.28 (C) De novo PS2 + PM1 + PM2 + PP3 LP DS
35 SCN1A chr2–166,900,287 166,900,288 NM_001165963 c.1934_1935del p.V645fs De novo PVS1 + PS2 + PM2 P DS
38 SCN1A chr2–166,859,121 NM_006920 c.G4112T p.G1371V D P D 5.54 (C) De novo PS2 + PM2 LP DS
53 SCN1A chr2–166,894,306 166,894,337 NM_001165963 c.2895_2926del p.Q965fs Unknown PVS1 + PM2 LP DS
56 SCN1A chr2–166,908,355 a [102] NM_006920 c.838T > C p.W280R D D D 5.41 (C) De novo PS1 + PS2 + PM2 + PP3 P DS
65 SCN1A chr2–166,850,927 NM_006920 c.4549-1G > C splicing D + 5.76 (C) De novo PVS1 + PS2 + PM2 P DS
115 SCN1A chr2–166,848,614 NM_006920 c.5138C > A p.A1713D D D D 5.8 (C) De novo PS2 + PM2 + PP3 LP DS
124 SCN1A chr2–166,848,438 a [103] NM_006920 c.5314G > A p.A1772T D D D 5.69 (C) De novo PS1 + PS2 + PM2 + PP3 P DS
130 SCN1A chr2–166,854,634 166,854,639 a [101] NM_006920 c.4352_4356del p.Y1451Cfs*22 De novo PVS1 + PS1 + PS2 + PM2 P DS
140 SCN1A chr2–166,911,210 166,911,211 NM_006920 c.539delT p.L180X De novo PVS1 + PS2 + PM2 P DS
148 SCN1A chr2–166,901,579 NM_001165963 c.1636G > T p.E546X A 6.17 (C) Unknown PVS1 + PM2 LP DS
149 SCN1A chr2–166,894,430 a [104] NM_006920 c.2769G > A p.M923I D D D 5.18 (C) Paternal PS1 + PM2 + PP3 LP DS
162 SCN1A chr2–166,848,043 166,848,045 NM_001165963 c.5740_5742del p.1914_1914del De novo PS2 + PM2 + PM4 LP DS
172 SCN1A chr2–166,903,330 NM_006920 c.1327G > T p.E443X A 5.31 (C) De novo PVS1 + PS2 + PM2 P DS
93 SCN2A chr2–166,243,416 NM_001040142 c.4712T > C p.I1571T D D D 5.17 (C) De novo PS2 + PM1 + PM2 + PP3 LP OS
55 KCNQ2 chr20–62,073,781 a [105] NM_172107 c.794C > T p.A265V D P D 3.38 (C) De novo PS1 + PS2 + PM2 P OS
90 STXBP1 chr9–130,423,419 a [53] NM_003165 c.364C > T p.R122X A 4.92 (C) Unknown PVS1 + PS1 + PM2 P OS-WS
52 ADSL chr22–40,745,935 NM_000026 c.253C > T p.R85X A 5.59 (C) Maternal PVS1 + PM2 LP WS
chr22–40,742,633 [58] NM_000026 c.71C > T p.P24L T B D 0.153 (N) Paternal PM2 UC
89 KCNT1 chr9–138,651,532 a [106] NM_020822 c.862G > A p.G288S T D D 5.05 (C) De novo PS1 + PS2 + PM1 + PM2 P WS
104 CDKL5 chrX-18,593,592 18,593,593 NM_003159 c.265delT p.F89Lfs*24 De novo PVS1 + PS2 + PM2 P WS
151 STXBP1 chr9–130,428,529 NM_003165 c.748C > T p.Q250X A 5.72 (C) De novo PVS1 + PS2 + PM2 P WS
29 SYNGAP1 chr6–33,393,659 33,393,662 NM_006772 c.274_277del p.G92fs De novo PVS1 + PS2 + PM2 P Doose
164 SLC2A1 chr1–43,396,517 NM_006516 c.296T > G p.M99R D B D 5.51 (C) De novo PS2 + PM2 LP GLUT1-DS
30 MECP2 chrX-153,296,516 a [63] NM_001110792 c.799C > T p.R267X A 3.55 (C) De novo PVS1 + PS1 + PS2 + PM2 P Rett
32 TSC2 chr16–2,126,095 a [91] NM_000548 c.2666C > T p.A889V D D D 5.09 (C) Paternal PS1 + PM2 + PP3 LP TSC
94 TSC2 chr16–2,130,180 a [107] NM_000548 c.3412C > T p.R1138X A 4.74 (C) De novo PVS1 + PS1 + PS2 + PM2 P TSC
TSC2 chr16–2,130,366 a [66] NM_000548 c.3598C > T p.R1200W D D D 4.74 (C) De novo PS1 + PS2 + PM2 + PP3 P
98 TSC2 chr16–2,138,467 NM_001077183 c.5079C > G p.Y1693X D 0.137 (N) Paternal PVS1 + PM2 LP TSC
TSC2 chr16–2,138,465 2,138,466 NM_001077183 c.5077delT p.Y1693fs Paternal PVS1 + PM2 LP
7 SCN8A chr12–52,184,209 a [108] NM_001177984 c.4324G > A p.E1442K D D D 4.68 (C) Paternal PS1 + PM2 + PP3 LP UEE
IQSEC2 chrX-53,263,621 53,263,622 NM_001111125 c.4246_4247insG p.S1416fs De novo PVS1 + PS2 + PM2 P
63 CACNA1A chr19–13,566,019 a [109] NM_001127221 c.301G > C p.E101Q D D D 5.01 (C) De novo PS1 + PS2 + PM1 + PM2 + PP3 P UEE
66 SCN8A chr12–52,200,885 a [110] NM_001177984 c.5492G > A p.R1831Q D D D 4.91 (C) De novo PS1 + PS2 + PM2 + PP3 P UEE
69 PCDH19 chrX-99,551,873 99,551,874 NM_001184880 c.2849-1G > − splicing + Unknown PVS1 + PM2 LP UEE
157 GABRB3 chr15–26,812,802 a [111] NM_021912 c.761C > T p.S254F D D D 6.06 (C) De novo PS1 + PS2 + PM1 + PM2 + PP3 P UEE
160 GABRA1 chr5–161,309,645 a [112] NM_001127648 c.641G > A p.R214H D D D 5.34 (C) De novo PS1 + PS2 + PM1 + PM2 + PP3 P UEE
54 CHD2 chr15–93,540,231 NM_001271 c.3640G > T p.G1214X A 5.64 (C) De novo PVS1 + PS2 + PM2 P UEE
40 VRK2 chr2–58,312,086 NM_001130483 c.C256 + 1G > A splicing D + 5.86 (C) Unknown PVS1 + PM2 LP UE
44 ATP1A2 chr1–160,098,521 NM_000702 c.1097G > T p.G366V D D D 4.77 (C) De novo PS2 + PM1 + PM2 + PP3 LP UE
68 TSC1 chr9–135,772,854 NM_000368 c.2768_2769insC p.L924Ffs*26 De novo PVS1 + PS2 + PM2 P UE
79 SLC9A6 chrX-135,080,322 135,080,336 NM_001042537 c.582_595del p.Y194fs De novo PVS1 + PS2 + PM2 P UE

Abbreviations: M male, F female, m month, y year, SIFT Sorts intolerant from tolerant (D, damaging; T, tolerant), PP2, polymorphism phenotyping v2 (D, damaging; P, possible damaging; B, benign), MT mutation taster (D, disease causing; A, disease causing automatic), HSF human splicing finder (+, altering splicing), GERP++ genomic evolutionary rate profiling (C, conserved; N, nonconserved), KG 1000 Genomes project, LP likely pathogenic, P pathogenic, DS Dravet syndrome, OS Ohtahara syndrome, OS-WS OS syndrome evolves to West syndrome, WS West syndrome, Doose Doose syndrome, GLUT1-DS glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome, Rett Rett syndrome, TSC tuberous sclerosis complex, UEE unclassified epileptic encephalopathy, UE unclassified refractory epilepsy

a Mutations have been reported in HGMD database

More recent studies suggest that many severe epilepsy types begin in infancy or childhood, especially those with psychomotor retardation and epileptic encephalopathies are often due to de novo mutations [30, 31]. In our study, 32/43 (74.4%) pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were de novo, five (11.6%) were paternal, one (2.3%) was maternal, and five (11.6%) were unknown due to blood samples from parents were unavailable (Table 3).

To further explore the genetic pathogenesis of epilepsy, we subdivided the mutated genes into nine groups according to the molecular and biological function of the gene produce. These functional groups included voltage-gated ion channels, enzyme/enzyme modulators, membrane trafficking, ligand-gated ion channels, DNA/RNA binding, cell-adhesion proteins, glucose transporter, proton antiporter, and GTP/GDP exchanges. Variants in ion channel genes (SCN1A, SCN2A, SCN8A, CACNA1A, KCNT1, KCNQ2) accounted for 51.2% (22/43) of the pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants. Variants in enzyme/enzyme modulator genes (TSC1, TSC2, SYNGAP1, ATP1A2, CDKL5, ADSL, VRK2) accounted for 25.6% (11/43) of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants. Variants in genes encoded membrane trafficking (STXBP1), ligand-gated ion channels (GABRA1, GABRB3), DNA/RNA binding proteins (MECP2, CHD2) each accounted for 4.7% (2/43) (Fig. 1b). Ion channels (voltage-gated and ligand-gated) accounted for 55.8% in total, suggesting that dysfunction of ion channels plays critical roles in the pathogenesis of epilepsy.

We then analyzed the yield of the epilepsy gene panel testing based on electroclinical syndrome (Fig. 1c). The yield of deleterious variants in Dravet syndrome (69.6%, 16/23) and glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome (100%, 1/1) patients was higher than that in others. Patients with onset age of seizures ≤12 months had higher yields of deleterious variants compared to those with onset age of seizures > 12 months (31/101 vs 9/71; χ2 = 7.583, df = 1, P = 0.006). The family history did not affect whether or not a deleterious genetic variant was identified (7/27 vs 33/145; χ2 = 0.128, df = 1, P = 0.804).

There were 16 mutations in SCN1A gene, of which six (37.5%) were missense mutations, one (6.25%) was a splice site mutation, four (25%) were nonsense mutations, four (25%) were frame-shifts, and one (6.25%) was deletion mutation. Thirteen of the 16 (81.3%) SCN1A mutations were de novo and 11 (68.8%) were novel. We further analysed the positions of the mutations in the affected proteins corresponding to gene mutations and found that 43.8% (7/16) of protein changes are in the intracellular loop of sodium channel protein type 1 subunit alpha, 31.3% (5/16) are in the extracellular loop, 18.8% (3/16) are in the transmembrane region, and 6.25% (1/16) are in the pore forming area (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic representation of the mutations in subunit alpha of sodium channel type 1 (SCN1A) in our study. SCN1A alpha unit has four domains (I–IV), each domain includes 6 transmembrane segments (S1–S6). Purple circle = mutation; AEDs, anti-epileptic drugs. The position of mutations in SCN1A is approximate and is according to reference transcript NM_001165963.

There has been a marked increase in genetic diagnoses of a number of key childhood-onset epilepsy syndromes, such as Dravet syndrome, which has been mainly linked to SCN1A [17]. In our 16 patients diagnosed as Dravet syndrome with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, all identified mutations were in the SCN1A gene. These 16 Dravet syndrome patients had typical manifestations: onset between 3 to 8 months of age, fever-sensitive, multiple seizure types, and developmental delay after seizure onset. 81.25% (13/16) SCN1A mutations were de novo in Dravet syndrome patients and one was inherited from the father who had a history of febrile seizures (FS). 12.5% (2/16) SCN1A mutations were unknown. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic mutations each accounted for 50% (Table 4). 50% (8/16) of the Dravet syndrome variants cause nonsense or frameshift mutations that result in truncated proteins, which was consistent with a previous study [57]. We evaluated whether different seizure types, family history, abnormal brain MRI, or developmental delay were associated with specific SCN1A mutation types or locations within the gene. We did not detect any bias towards particular regions of the gene or in the type of mutation, although our small sample size did not provide substantial power (Additional file 1: Tables S3 and S4).

Table 4.

Clinical features in DS patients

Case code Gender/age Diagosis Age of onset Seizure types EEG Brain MRI/CT Developmental delay Gene cDNA change Protein change Parental Origin ACMG pathogenicity
13 F/2y6m DS 3m FS, FoS, Myo FSW Normal Yes SCN1A c.1513A > T p.K505X De novo LP
23 F/3y DS 7m FS, FoS (A), Myo, FBTC Multi. FD Underdeveloped myelin Yes SCN1A c.4331_4334del p.E1444fs De novo P
26 F/5y11m DS 5m FS, SE, FoS (A), Myo, FBTC FSW Normal Yes SCN1A c.3689T>C p.L1230P De novo LP
35 M/4y DS 3m FS, SE, GTCS, aAb Multi. FD Normal Yes SCN1A c.1934_1935del p.V645fs De novo P
38 F/1y6m DS 4m FS, SE, Myo FSW Nonspecific Yes SCN1A c.G4112T p.G1371V De novo LP
53 M/5y DS 7m FS, aAb, Myo, Fos (I) Multi. FD Normal Yes SCN1A c.2895_2926del p.Q965fs Unknown LP
56 F/3y6m DS 5m FS, Myo, GTCS, SE, FoS (A), aAb Multi. FD Nonspecific Yes SCN1A c.838T > C p.W280R De novo P
65 M/2y4m DS 5m FS, SE, FoS (A) FSW Normal Yes SCN1A c.4549-1G > C splicing De novo P
115 M/2y1m DS 8m FS, FoS (I), FoS (hemi clonic), GTCS FSW Enlargement of the subarachnoid space in front of left temporal lobe Yes SCN1A c.5138C > A p.A1713D De novo LP
124 M/3y DS 5m FS, FoS (A), FBTC FSW Nonspecific Yes SCN1A c.5314G > A p.A1772T De novo P
130 F/11y DS 6m FS, FoS (A), aAb, Myo, GTCS Multi. FD Normal Yes SCN1A c.4352_4356del p.Y1451Cfs*22 De novo P
140 F/1y9m DS 3m FS, GTCS, C, FoS (I) FSW Normal Yes SCN1A c.539delT p.L180X De novo P
148 F/6y8m DS 4m FS, GTCS, FoS, aAb Multi. FD Normal Yes SCN1A c.1636G > T p.E546X Unknown LP
149 M/3y6m DS 4m FS, FoS (A), Myo, GTCS Multi. FD, GSW Normal Yes SCN1A c.2769G > A p.M923I Paternal (FS) LP
162 M/4y DS 5m FS, FoS (A), Myo, FBTC Multi. FD Normal Yes SCN1A c.5740_5742del p.1914_1914del De novo LP
172 F/8y DS 5m FS, aAb, Myo, FBTC Multi. FD, GSW, GPSW Normal Yes SCN1A c.1327G > T p.E443X De novo P

Abbreviations: M male, F female, m month, y year, P pathogenic, LP likely pathogenic, UC uncertain, DS Dravet syndrome, FS febrile seizures, SE status epilepticus, FoS focal seizures, FoS (I) focal seizures (impaired awareness), FoS (A) focal seizures (aware), FBTC focal to bilateral tonic-clonic, Myo myoclonic, aAb atypical absence, GTCS generalized tonic-clonic seizures, FSW focal spike wave, Multi. FD multifocal discharges, GSW generalized spike-wave, GPSW generalized polyspike-wave

Twelve patients presented typical manifestation of Ohtahara syndrome: onset age within postnatal 30 days, tonic spasms, burst suppression EEG and developmental delay. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in Ohtahara syndrome were in the KCNQ2 (1), STXBP1 (1), SCN2A (1) genes. The nonsense mutation in STXBP1 (c.364C > T, p.R122X) was detected in one Ohtahara syndrome patients that evolved to West syndrome. This patient had an onset age of postnatal 17 day, spasms, and burst-suppression EEG at postnatal 22 day and hypsarrhythmia EEG at 4 months (Table 5).

Table 5.

Clinical features in OS, WS, LGS, Doose, GLUT1-DS, Rett, TSC, UEE and UE patients

Case code Gender/age Diagosis Age of onset Seizure types EEG Brain MRI/CT Developmental delay Gene cDNA change Protein change Parental Origin ACMG pathogenicity
55 M/54d OS 1d FoS, Tonic spasms BS, FSW Normal Yes KCNQ2 c.794C > T p.A265V De novo P
93 M/40d OS 3d Tonic spasms BS Normal Yes SCN2A c.4712T > C p.I1571T De novo LP
90 M/2y11m OS-WS 17d Tonic spasms, Spa. BS, Hypsarrhy. Normal Yes STXBP1 c.364C > T p.R122X Unknown P
52 F/1y8m WS 2m Spa. Multi. FD, Hypsarrhy. Cerebral dysplasia Yes ADSL c.253C > T p.R85X Maternal LP
ADSL c.71C > T p.P24L Paternal UC
89 F/1y11m WS 19d FoS, Spa. Multi. FD, Hypsarrhy. Subdural hemorrhage Yes KCNT1 c.862G > A p.G288S De novo P
104 F/2y10m WS 3m7d Spa. Hypsarrhy., Multi.FD Normal Yes CDKL5 c.265delT p.F89Lfs*24 De novo P
151 F/9m WS 3m Spa. Hypsarrhy., Multi. FD Enlargement of the subarachnoid space Yes STXBP1 c.748C > T p.Q250X De novo P
29 M/5y6m Doose 1y3m Myo-At., Myo, aAb Abnormal background theta, GSW, GPSW Normal No SYNGAP1 c.274_277del p.G92fs De novo P
164 F/6y GLUT1-DS 2y4m GTCS FSW, Multi. FD Nonspecific (Hair loss leads to bald) No SLC2A1 c.296T > G p.M99R De novo LP
30 F/4y4m Rett 3y2m Fos (I), FBTC Multi. FD Normal Yes MECP2 c.799C > T p.R267X De novo P
32 M/8y TSC 1y6m FoS (I), FBTC Multi. FD Multi nodules No TSC2 c.2666C > T p.A889V Paternal LP
94 F/9m TSC (WS) 3m Spa. Multi. FD, Hypsarrhy. Multi nodules Yes TSC2 c.3412C > T p.R1138X De novo P
TSC2 c.3598C > T p.R1200W De novo P
98 M/3y TSC (WS) 4m Spa., aAb Multi. FD, Hypsarrhy. Nonspecific Yes TSC2 c.5079C > G p.Y1693X Paternal LP
TSC2 c.5077delT p.Y1693fs Paternal LP
7 M/2y UEE (EIEE13) 6m FoS (I), FBTC Multi. FD Enlargement of the subarachnoid space Yes SCN8A c.4324G > A p.E1442K Paternal LP
IQSEC2 c.4246_4247insG p.S1416fs De novo P
63 M/4y UEE (EIEE42) 5m FoS, GTCS Multi. FD Normal Yes CACNA1A c.301G > C p.E101Q De novo P
66 M/1y9m UEE (EIEE13) 4m FBTC, FoS Multi. FD Enlargement of the subarachnoid space Yes SCN8A c.5492G > A p.R1831Q De novo P
69 F/2y1m UEE (EIEE9) 1y3m FBTC, C, T Multi. FD Normal Yes PCDH19 c.2849-1G > − splicing Unknown LP
157 F/2y UEE (EIEE43) 2m C, FoS (I) FSW Normal Yes GABRB3 c.761C > T p.S254F De novo P
160 M/6y UEE (EIEE19) 6m FoS (I), GTCS FSW Normal Yes GABRA1 c.641G > A p.R214H De novo P
54 F/7y UEE (EEOC) 4y2m SE, GTCS, FoS (I) Mult. FD Normal Yes CHD2 c.3640G > T p.G1214X De novo P
40 F/2y11m UE 4m FoS FSW Normal No VRK2 c.C256 + 1G > A splicing Unknown LP
44 F/5y6m UE 4y FoS (automatisms, emotional) Multi. FD Nodules in internal side of left anterior limb of internal capsule; caput of caudate nucleus or heterotopic gray matter Yes ATP1A2 c.1097G > T p.G366V De novo LP
68 M/6y UE 4y FoS (A) FSW Normal No TSC1 c.2768_2769insC p.L924Ffs*26 De novo P
79 M/3y UE 1y2m FoS (I), FBTC Multi. FD Normal Yes SLC9A6 c.582_595del p.Y194fs De novo P

Abbreviations: M male, F female, m month, y year, P pathogenic, LP likely pathogenic, UC uncertain, OS Ohtahara syndrome, OS-WS Ohtahara syndrome evolves to West syndrome, WS West syndrome, Doose Doose syndrome, GLUT1-DS glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome, Rett Rett syndrome, TSC tuberous sclerosis complex, UEE unclassified epileptic encephalopathy, UE unclassified refractory epilepsy, EEIE early-infantile epileptic encephalopathies, EEOC childhood-onset epileptic encephalopathy, Spa. Spasms, FoS focal seizures, FoS (I) focal seizures (impaired awareness), FoS (A) focal seizures (aware), FBTC focal to bilateral tonic-clonic, T tonic, C clonic, Myo myoclonic, aAb atypical absence, At. atonic, GTCS generalized tonic-clonic seizures, SE status epilepticus, BS burst suppression, Hypsarrhy. hypsarrhythmia, Multi. FD multifocal discharges, FSW focal spike-wave, GSW generalized spike-wave, GPSW generalized polyspike-wave

West syndrome patients in our study had onset ages of seizures ranging from postnatal 19 days to 6 months. Typical clinical manifestations were all observed, including spasms, hypsarrhythmia EEG, and developmental delay. 16.7% (2/12) of the West syndrome children evolves to Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. After sequencing, we identified 4 pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations in the following genes: STXBP1 (1), KCNT1 (1), CDKL5 (1), ADSL (1). 75% (3/4) of these variants were de novo.

One of the West syndrome patients were found to carry two mutations: a nonsense ADSL (c.253C > T, p.R85X) mutation was scored as likely pathogenic and was inherited from her unaffected mother. Another reported missense ADSL (c.71C > T, p.P24L) [58] mutation which was inherited from her unaffected father were scored as uncertain pathogenicity. ADSL has been reported to be related to adenylosuccinate lyase deficiency, which is an autosomal recessive defect of purine metabolism [59, 60]. The patient presented with spasms 2 months after birth. Brain MRI showed cerebral dysplasia and EEG showed hypsarrhythmia and multifocal discharges. The patient also had developmental delay and lack of eye contact. A definitive diagnosis can be made with high performance liquid chromatography examination of the urine to detect the ratio of succinyladenosine and succinyl-aminoimidazole carboximide riboside, but this was not available for the patient in question. Thus, this patient was diagnosed clinically as having West syndrome.

A novel frame-shift mutation in SYNGAP5 (c.274_277del, p.G92fs) was detected in a patient with Doose syndrome. This patient presented with myoclonic and myoclonic-astatic seizures, as well as having atypical absence seizures. SYNGAP5 had been reported to be associated with Doose syndrome and mental retardation, autosomal dominant 5 (MRD5) [51, 61, 62]. This mutation, which is very rare, was de novo, and caused frameshift changes in Ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP, was therefore scored as pathogenic (Table 5).

One glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome patient presented with seizures at age 28 months. The patient has alopecia and was almost bald at 4 years old. The child did not have other abnormalities in blood tests, brain MRI, or neurological exam. Her cerebrospinal fluid glucose value was 2.04 mmol/L (blood glucose value was 7.2 mmol/L before lumbar puncture; fasting blood glucose value was 5.2 mmol/L). NGS identified a missense mutation in SLC2A1 (c.296T > G, p.M99R). The mutation was de novo and novel. The patient’s parents and sister were normal, which is consistent with the sequencing results. Symptoms improved with a ketogenic diet, with seizures controlled for more than 6 months.

One MECP2 mutation (c.799C > T, p.R267X) was detected in a girl diagnosed as Rett syndrome. The girl developed normally for the first 18 months, gradually lost speech ability while developing repetitive hand-wringing. Seizures began at age 3 years. The MECP2 gene is located on the X-chromosome, and Rett syndrome is inherited through this gene in a dominant fashion [63]. This patient had a de novo MECP2 nonsense mutation, consistent with her parents being unaffected.

40% (2/5) of tuberous sclerosis complex patients were diagnosed with West syndrome associated with tuberous sclerosis complex in our study. Tuberous sclerosis complex is closely related to the TSC1/TSC2 genes [6467].

In our study, all of the tuberous sclerosis complex patients’ initial presentations were seizures, of which 80% (4/5) presented in the first year of life. 60% (3/5) had hypomelanotic macules and 40% (2/5) had multi nodules. One patient’s only clinical manifestation was seizures and three (60%) patients with seizures had only one major feature of tuberous sclerosis complex. After sequencing, 60% (3/5) patients were found to have deleterious TSC1 or TSC2 mutations.

We identified more than one TSC1/2 mutations in 2 patients. One patient has two TSC2 mutations inherited from his affected father. Facial angiofibromas appeared by age 3–4 years in 60% (3/5) patients in the follow-up period. Gilboa et al. [68] reported four patients with the same TSC1 genomic deletion (9q34.13q34.2) in a family and none of them fulfilled the clinical criteria for tuberous sclerosis complex. In our study, one patient with pathogenic TSC1 (c.2768_2769insC, p.L924Ffs*26) mutation presented with focal seizures beginning at age four. There were two hypopigmented macules on the patient’s abdomen. The brain MRI results were normal and there are no other features of tuberous sclerosis complex. This de novo mutation causes a frame-shift in hamartin and has not been reported previously. Thus, this patient was considered to have unclassified refractory epilepsy.

One unclassified epileptic encephalopathy patient had two deleterious mutations: SCN8A inherited from his affected father (c.4324G > A, p.E1442K) and IQSEC2 (c.4246_4247insG, p.S1416fs). Early-infantile epileptic encephalopathies (EIEE) caused by SCN8A mutations are designated as EIEE13 (OMIM #614558) [69]. The missense mutation in SCN8A is very rare in the general population, and had been previously predicted to be damaging by SIFT, MT and PP2. IQSEC2 is an X-linked gene that has been reported to be related to intellectual disability and epilepsy, and it encodes the IQ motif and SEC7 domain-containing protein 2 [70]. The identified novel IQSEC2 mutation was de novo and was scored as being pathogenic.

Other pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations found in patients with unclassified epileptic encephalopathy included CACNA1A, GABRA1, GABRB3, PCDH19, and CHD2. Epileptic encephalopathies with the above mutations had been designated as EIEE42, EIEE19, EIEE43, EIEE9 and EEOC (childhood-onset epileptic encephalopathy) according to Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM). Other deleterious variants found in patients with unclassified refractory epilepsy were in VRK2, ATP1A2, and SLC9A6. Taking these unclassified epileptic encephalopathies and unclassified refractory epilepsy patients’ clinical manifestations into consideration, we found that all patients with deleterious mutations in genes encoding ion channels (SCN8A, CACNA1A, GABRB3, GABRA1) had similar clinical symptoms: onset age of seizures within the first year, epileptic encephalopathy and developmental delay. In contrast, patients with mutations in VRK2, ATP1A2, and SLC9A6, had relatively later onset age of seizures.

We then assessed the clinical benefit of genetic testing in those patients with identified deleterious variants. NGS helped with the diagnosis (n = 8), medication selection (n = 18), reproductive planning (n = 4), and treatment planning (n = 1). The finding of the SLC2A1 variant in Case 164 prompted other tests such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) glucose that were clinically useful. Identification of deleterious SCN1A mutations in five young infants with clinically suspected Dravet syndrome helped early diagnosis (Case 13, 38, 65, 115, 140) and led to the discontinuation of oxcarbazepine (Case 13) that exacerbated seizures. Identification of SCN1A mutations in other Dravet syndrome patients helped to avoid sodium channel blockers such as oxcarbazepine, carbamazepine and lamotrigine. Among the four Dravet syndrome patients who responded to anticonvulsants (Case 13, 26, 149, 172), 75% (3/4) of them were prescribed sodium valproate or clonazepam suggesting that these medications may be effective in Dravet syndrome. The finding of the TSC2 variants in Cases 94 and 98 helped early diagnosis and Case 32 experienced remission with administration of rapamune. Identification of TSC1 prompted clinical surveillance for tuberous sclerosis complex in Case 68. The findings of patients with deleterious variants in TSC2 (Case 32, 98), SCN8A (Case 7), SCN1A (Case 149), ADSL (Case 52) which were inherited, helped in prenatal counselling (Table 6).

Table 6.

Clinical benefits after molecular diagnosis

Clinical benefits Effects (Case details)
Diagnosis SLC2A1 (GLUT1-DS) Definitive diagnosis (Case 164)
SCN1A (DS) Definitive diagnosis (Case 13, 38, 65, 115, 140)
TSC2 (TSC) Definitive diagnosis (Case 94, 98)
Management implications SLC2A1, using KD Controlled (Case 164, KD)
SCN1A, stopping OXC Remitted (Case 13, VPA, TPM,10–20 / month)
SCN1A, avoiding OXC, CBZ, and LTG Remitted (Case 23, VPA, TPM, seizure-free for 5 months; Case 26, LEV, TPM, CZP, seizure-free for 6 months; Case 149, VPA, TPM, LEV, CZP, seizure-free for 4 months; Case 172, VPA, TPM, CZP, seizure-free for 1 year)
Uncontrolled (Case 35, 38, 53, 56, 65, 115, 124, 130, 140, 148, 162)
TSC2, using rapamune Remitted (Case 32, seizure-free for 7 months)
Long-term follow up TSC1 (risk of TSC) Case 68
Reproductive planning Suggesting the family conduct genetic counseling TSC2 (Case 32, 98), SCN8A (Case 7), SCN1A (Case 149), ADSL (Case 52)

Abbreviations: DS Dravet syndrome, GLUT1-DS glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome, Rett Rett syndrome, TSC tuberous sclerosis complex, KD ketogenic diet, OXC oxcarbazepine, CBZ carbamazepine, LTG lamotrigine, VPA sodium valproate, TPM topiramate, LEV levetiracetam, CZP clonazepam

Discussion

Epilepsy is highly heterogeneous and can be primarily genetic in origin, or be secondary to structural or metabolic disorders of the central nervous system [71, 72]. To date, over 500 genes have been implicated in epilepsy [7376]. However, the overlapping clinical features of different epilepsy syndromes and non-specific phenotypes can hamper clinical and genetic diagnosis [53]. The correct genetic diagnosis can help to guide treatment and prognosis. In addition to genetic origins, pediatric epilepsy may also arise from epigenetic mechanisms mediating gene-environment interactions during neurodevelopment. In this study, we used NGS to investigate 153 epilepsy related genes in a cohort of 172 refractory epilepsy children.

Approximately one quarter of genes identified in epilepsy encode ion channel proteins, including voltage-gated channels (Na+, K+, Ca2+ channels and hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels) and ligand-gated ion channels (N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptors, Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors and Nicotinic Acetylcholine receptors) [77]. The genes that encode ion channels and are relevant to epilepsy include SCN1A, SCN1B, SCN2A, SCN8A, KCNA1, KCNA2, KCNB1, KCNC1, KCNMA1, KCNQ2, KCNQ3, KCNT1, KCTD7, HCN1, CACAN1A, CACNA1H, GRIN1, GRIN2A, GRIN2B, GRIN2D, GABRA1, GABRB3, GABRG2, CHRNA2, CHRNA4, CHRNB2. In our study, 51.2% pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were found in voltage-gated ion channels and 4.7% were found in ligand-gated ion channels. Thus, we further confirmed that ion channels play an important role in the pathogenesis of epilepsy.

An SCN1A mutation was first discovered in epilepsy in 2000 [72], and now hundreds of new SCN1A mutations have been described in epilepsy patients, making it the most common epilepsy-related gene [78]. In our study, we found SCN1A mutations in 16/44 deleterious variants, making it the most common gene to show variation in our study. SCN1A encodes the Nav1.1 pore-forming α-subunit, expressed mainly in inhibitory GABAergic neurons. The α-subunit comprises four homologous domains (I–IV), forming a tetrameric structure. Each domain is composed of six transmembrane segments (S1–S6) [77]. The S4, voltage-sensing segment has multiple positively charged amino acids. The intracellular loop between III and IV domain functions as the inactivation gate. The α-subunit is usually associated with two β-subunits that influence α-subunit localization and function [77]. Among α-subunit of sodium channel genetic variants in our study, 43.8% (7/16) are within the intracellular loop, 31.3% (5/16) in the extracellular loop, 18.8% (3/16) in the transmembrane area, and 6.25% (1/16) in the pore forming area. All the extracellular mutations are between S5 and S6, which is very close to the pore forming area. These variants may influence the initiation and propagation of action potentials, making these inhibitory GABAergic neurons less excitable. Some antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) bind to the inner cavity of the pore of the sodium channel (IS6, IIIS6 and IVS6) [77, 79]. The pore forming area or internal/external loop could be promising targets for new seizure prophylaxis medications.

Patients harboring SCN1A mutations can have with Dravet syndrome or generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus. One Dravet syndrome patient inherited the SCN1A mutations from his father only had febrile seizures. This could be due to somatic mosaicism [72, 80, 81]. A Dravet syndrome mouse model (Nav1.1 knockout-based) responded well to stiripentol and clobazam, which are commonly used to treat Dravet syndrome [8285]. One of the patients in our study was treated with oxcarbazepine, which blocks sodium channels and worsened seizures, before the diagnosis of Dravet syndrome was made. This case illustrates the importance of correct molecular diagnosis in selecting the best anticonvulsant.

Approximately half of Ohtahara syndrome patients with STXBP1 mutations evolve to West syndrome [86]. In our study, there was one such patient with a nonsense mutation in STXBP1, suggesting that this gene could play a role in the etiology of West syndrome. Our findings also suggest that STXBP1 is related to both Ohtahara syndrome and West syndrome.

KCNT1 is associated with epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures, autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy, and other types of early onset epileptic encephalopathies [8789]. Ohba et al. [88] found 11 KCNT1 mutations in a total of 362 epilepsy patients: 9/18 epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures cases (50%), 1/180 West syndrome cases (0.56%), and 1/66 unclassified early onset epileptic encephalopathy cases (1.52%), suggesting that KCNT1 may be a causal gene for West syndrome. In our study, one KCNT1 (c.862G > A, p.G288S) mutation was found in a patient diagnosed as West syndrome.

Genetic studies of neuropsychiatric disease have led to the discovery of molecular etiology and pathophysiology. For example, most cases of Rett syndrome are now known to arise from mutations in the MECP2 gene, which codes for a methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 [90]. Another example is glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome, which has been attributed to variants in SLC2A1, SLC2A2, and GLUT1. In our study, the glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome patient did not have cerebrospinal fluid analysis as part of their diagnostic work-up until the genetic data suggested the diagnosis. This example illustrates the utility of NGS in clinical scenarios, and in time this may become an important part of the evaluation of pediatric patients with epilepsy. In some epilepsy syndromes, crucial interventions such as diet modification can have dramatic beneficial effects, so early diagnosis is vital [91, 92].

In our study, SCN1A was the main deleterious variant in Dravet syndrome and KCNQ2, STXBP1, SCN2A were found in Ohtahara syndrome. Deleterious variants in STXBP1, KCNT1, CDKL5, ADSL genes were found in West syndrome. Novel mutations in SYNGAP1 were found in Doose syndrome, a SLC2A1 mutation was found in GLUT1-DS and a de novo MECP2 mutation were found in Rett syndrome. TSC1/TSC2 variants were found in 60% of patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. Mutations found in unclassified epileptic encephalopathy were mainly in ion-channel genes. Thus, our study reinforces previous observations that the clinical syndrome and genetic etiology do not always match.

We tested 153 epilepsy genes and found 43 pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in this study. Considering that over 500 epilepsy genes have been reported [7376], our work was not comprehensive, which is a limitation of this study. With the decreasing cost of whole genome sequencing, the interrogation of the entire genome is now feasible for larger samples of epilepsy patients, and this approach has already been fruitful in other neuropsychiatric disorders such as autism, Kabuki syndrome, Bohring-Opitz syndrome and others [93, 94].

For genetic testing, it is proposed to conduct the strong candidate gene sequencing first (SCN1A for Dravet syndrome, MECP2 for Rett syndrome and TSC1/2 for tuberous sclerosis complex) before a NGS multi-gene panel testing [9597]. In our study, we conducted targeted panel sequencing on Dravet syndrome and Rett syndrome patients before screening the strongest candidate gene for the following reasons. First, the correct clinical diagnosis of these syndromes can be difficult, especially in some of the younger patients in our sample, and often requires longitudinal assessment, which delays the correct diagnosis. Thus, we elected to perform NGS on our subjects before knowing the clinical diagnosis in some cases, such as these syndromes. Since our NGS panel that contains 153 epilepsy genes, our approach could facilitate the correct diagnosis in some cases. Second, it is now apparent that while 70–80% Dravet syndrome patients have SCN1A mutations, mutations in other genes such as SCN1B, SCN2A, SCN8A, PCDH19, GABRA1, GABRG2, STXBP1, CHD2 genes can cause Dravet syndrome like phenotypes [98], which would be missed if only SCN1A was sequenced. Similarly, CDKL5 and FOXG1 have been associated with atypical Rett syndrome [99], in addition to MECP2.

In tuberous sclerosis complex patients, we have a similar clinical scenario in which most features of tuberous sclerosis complex become evident only after 3 years of age, limiting their usefulness for early diagnosis [100]. In our study, all of the tuberous sclerosis complex patients’ initial presentations were seizures, of which 80% presented in the first year of life. 60% had hypomelanotic macules and 40% had multi nodules. 20% patient’s only clinical manifestation was seizures and 60% patients with seizures had only one major feature of tuberous sclerosis complex. 60% patients were found to have deleterious TSC1 or TSC2 mutations by NGS sequencing. Facial angiofibromas appeared by age 3–4 years in 60% patients in the follow-up period.

In summary, we identified 43 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, of which 26 mutations were novel and 32 were de novo. Variants in ion channel genes accounted for the largest category of gene in children with refractory epilepsy. Dravet syndrome is closely related to the SCN1A gene, which was the most frequently-appearing gene showing variants in our study. Novel and de novo mutations were found in Ohtahara syndrome, West syndrome, Doose syndrome and tuberous sclerosis complex pediatric patients. We also found a novel mutation in glucose transporter type 1 deficiency. Our results reinforce the importance and feasibility of precise genetic diagnosis for epilepsy, with the hope that in future, this will both aid in understanding the molecular pathophysiology and lead to new treatment targets.

Additional file

Additional file 1: (76.6KB, docx)

Table S1. The expression levels of the 153 targeted genes in brain. Table S2. The quality assurance (QA) /quality control (QC) of targeted sequencing. Table S3. The frequencies of different mutation locations in SCN1A gene and their corresponding phenotypes in Dravet syndrome patients. Table S4. The frequencies of different mutation types in SCN1A gene and their corresponding phenotypes in Dravet syndrome patients. (DOCX 98 kb)

Acknowledgements

All authors greatly appreciate to the families that take part in this research.

Funding

The project was funded by National Key Research and Development Program of China (NO. 2016YFC1306202), Key Research and Development Plan in Shandong Province (NO. 2016GSF201073), and General program of Qilu hospital, Shandong University (NO.2015QLMS08).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACMG

American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics

AEDs

antiepileptic drugs

EEOC

childhood-onset epileptic encephalopathy

EIEE

early-infantile epileptic encephalopathies

MT

Mutation Taster

NGS

next-generation sequencing

OMIM

Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man

PP2

PolyPhen-2

SCN1A

subunit alpha of sodium channel type 1

SIFT

Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant

Authors’ contributions

BML and JL were responsible for the original concept and the overall design of the research. JL, LLT, BML, RPS analyzed the EEG results and diagnosed patients. JL, SSS, YN, JL, XW, FL collected the clinical data and sample. JL, LLT, SSS, YN, XW, JL, JZ, FL, JW carried the experiments and analysed the sequencing data. JL, HYL performed structural and functional analysis experiments. JL, BML, CZ, AW, FL wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The program adhered to guidelines of patients’ consent for participation and research and was supported by the Ethics Committee of Qilu hospital, Shandong University (No. 2016(027)).

Consent for publication

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Jing Liu, Email: 201420441@mail.sdu.edu.cn.

Lili Tong, Email: tll-841110@163.com.

Shuangshuang Song, Email: shuangshuang0214@126.com.

Yue Niu, Email: niuyue13589120671@163.com.

Jun Li, Email: a15269170756@163.com.

Xiu Wu, Email: 17865151885@163.com.

Jie Zhang, Email: zhangjie@mygeno.cn.

Celement C. Zai, Email: Clement.Zai@camh.ca

Fang Luo, Email: luofang@mygeno.cn.

Jian Wu, Email: jw2231@mygeno.cn.

Haiyin Li, Email: Haiyin.Li@camh.ca.

Albert H. C. Wong, Email: albert.wong@utoronto.ca

Ruopeng Sun, Email: RuopengSun_Qilu@163.com.

Fang Liu, Email: fang.liu@camh.ca.

Baomin Li, Email: 198962000693@sdu.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Henshall DC, Hamer HM, Pasterkamp RJ, Goldstein DB, Kjems J, Prehn JHM, et al. MicroRNAs in epilepsy: pathophysiology and clinical utility. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(13):1368–1376. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30246-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nickels KC, Zaccariello MJ, Hamiwka LD, Wirrell EC. Cognitive and neurodevelopmental comorbidities in paediatric epilepsy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(8):465–476. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pitkanen A, Loscher W, Vezzani A, Becker AJ, Simonato M, Lukasiuk K, et al. Advances in the development of biomarkers for epilepsy. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(8):843–856. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00112-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Miller LL, Pellock JM, DeLorenzo RJ, Meyer JM, Corey LA. Univariate genetic analyses of epilepsy and seizures in a population-based twin study: the Virginia Twin Registry. Genet Epidemiol. 1998;15(1):33–49. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1998)15:1&#x0003c;33::AID-GEPI3&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kjeldsen MJ, Kyvik KO, Christensen K, Friis ML. Genetic and environmental factors in epilepsy: a population-based study of 11900 Danish twin pairs. Epilepsy Res. 2001;44(2–3):167–178. doi: 10.1016/S0920-1211(01)00196-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Speed D, O'Brien TJ, Palotie A, Shkura K, Marson AG, Balding DJ, et al. Describing the genetic architecture of epilepsy through heritability analysis. Brain. 2014;137:2680–2689. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brandler WM, Sebat J. From de novo mutations to personalized therapeutic interventions in autism. Annu Rev Med. 2015;66:487–507. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-091113-024550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hoischen A, Krumm N, Eichler EE. Prioritization of neurodevelopmental disease genes by discovery of new mutations. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17(6):764–772. doi: 10.1038/nn.3703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Directors ABo ACMG policy statement: updated recommendations regarding analysis and reporting of secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing. Genet Med. 2015;17(1):68–69. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–424. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, Kalia SS, Korf BR, Martin CL, et al. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med. 2013;15(7):565–574. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fisher RS, Acevedo C, Arzimanoglou A, Bogacz A, Cross JH, Elger CE, et al. ILAE official report: a practical clinical definition of epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2014;55(4):475–482. doi: 10.1111/epi.12550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fisher RS, Cross JH, D'Souza C, French JA, Haut SR, Higurashi N, et al. Instruction manual for the ILAE 2017 operational classification of seizure types. Epilepsia. 2017;58(4):531–542. doi: 10.1111/epi.13671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011; 10.14806/ej.17.1.200.
  • 15.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Van der Auwera GA, Carneiro MO, Hartl C, Poplin R, Del Angel G, Levy-Moonshine A, et al. From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2013;43:11.10.1–11.1033. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi1110s43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(16):e164. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schwarz JM, Cooper DN, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods. 2014;11(4):361–362. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(7):1073–1081. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010;7(4):248–249. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0410-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cooper GM, Stone EA, Asimenos G, Program NCS, Green ED, Batzoglou S, et al. Distribution and intensity of constraint in mammalian genomic sequence. Genome Res. 2005;15(7):901–913. doi: 10.1101/gr.3577405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Davydov EV, Goode DL, Sirota M, Cooper GM, Sidow A, Batzoglou S. Identifying a high fraction of the human genome to be under selective constraint using GERP++ PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6(12):e1001025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Desmet FO, Hamroun D, Lalande M, Collod-Beroud G, Claustres M, Beroud C. Human splicing finder: an online bioinformatics tool to predict splicing signals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(9):e67. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Uchino T, Haraguchi Y, Aparicio JM, Mizutani N, Higashikawa M, Naitoh H, et al. Three novel mutations in the liver-type arginase gene in three unrelated Japanese patients with argininemia. Am J Hum Genet. 1992;51(6):1406–1412. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Carvalho DR, Brand GD, Brum JM, Takata RI, Speck-Martins CE, Pratesi R. Analysis of novel ARG1 mutations causing hyperargininemia and correlation with arginase I activity in erythrocytes. Gene. 2012;509(1):124–130. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Uchino T, Snyderman SE, Lambert M, Qureshi IA, Shapira SK, Sansaricq C, et al. Molecular basis of phenotypic variation in patients with argininemia. Hum Genet. 1995;96(3):255–260. doi: 10.1007/BF00210403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wu TF, Liu YP, Li XY, Wang Q, Ding Y, Ma YY, et al. Five novel mutations in ARG1 gene in Chinese patients of argininemia. Pediatr Neurol. 2013;49(2):119–123. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Veeramah KR, Johnstone L, Karafet TM, Wolf D, Sprissler R, Salogiannis J, et al. Exome sequencing reveals new causal mutations in children with epileptic encephalopathies. Epilepsia. 2013;54(7):1270–1281. doi: 10.1111/epi.12201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kapoor A, Satishchandra P, Ratnapriya R, Reddy R, Kadandale J, Shankar SK, et al. An idiopathic epilepsy syndrome linked to 3q13.3-q21 and missense mutations in the extracellular calcium sensing receptor gene. Ann Neurol. 2008;64(2):158–167. doi: 10.1002/ana.21428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sato K, Hasegawa Y, Nakae J, Nanao K, Takahashi I, Tajima T, et al. Hydrochlorothiazide effectively reduces urinary calcium excretion in two Japanese patients with gain-of-function mutations of the calcium-sensing receptor gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(7):3068–3073. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.7.8639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kurahashi H, Hirose S. Autosomal Dominant Nocturnal Frontal Lobe Epilepsy. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, et al., editors. GeneReviews((R)). Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2018.
  • 32.Lauterborn JC, Ribak CE. Differences in dopamine beta-hydroxylase immunoreactivity between the brains of genetically epilepsy-prone and Sprague-Dawley rats. Epilepsy Res. 1989;4(3):161–176. doi: 10.1016/0920-1211(89)90001-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schank JR, Liles LC, Weinshenker D. Reduced anticonvulsant efficacy of valproic acid in dopamine beta-hydroxylase knockout mice. Epilepsy Res. 2005;65(1–2):23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2005.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Warter JM, Coquillat G, Kurtz D. Human circulating dopamine-beta-hydroxylase and epilepsy. Psychopharmacologia. 1975;41(1):75–79. doi: 10.1007/BF00421310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lesca G, Rudolf G, Labalme A, Hirsch E, Arzimanoglou A, Genton P, et al. Epileptic encephalopathies of the Landau-Kleffner and continuous spike and waves during slow-wave sleep types: genomic dissection makes the link with autism. Epilepsia. 2012;53(9):1526–1538. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03559.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Steele SU, Cheah SM, Veerapandiyan A, Gallentine W, Smith EC, Mikati MA. Electroencephalographic and seizure manifestations in two patients with folate receptor autoimmune antibody-mediated primary cerebral folate deficiency. Epilepsy Behav. 2012;24(4):507–512. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Perez-Duenas B, Toma C, Ormazabal A, Muchart J, Sanmarti F, Bombau G, et al. Progressive ataxia and myoclonic epilepsy in a patient with a homozygous mutation in the FOLR1 gene. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010;33(6):795–802. doi: 10.1007/s10545-010-9196-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kumari R, Lakhan R, Kalita J, Garg RK, Misra UK, Mittal B. Potential role of GABAA receptor subunit; GABRA6, GABRB2 and GABRR2 gene polymorphisms in epilepsy susceptibility and pharmacotherapy in North Indian population. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412(13–14):1244–1248. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hernandez CC, Gurba KN, Hu N, Macdonald RL. The GABRA6 mutation, R46W, associated with childhood absence epilepsy, alters 6beta22 and 6beta2 GABA(A) receptor channel gating and expression. J Physiol. 2011;589(Pt 23):5857–5878. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.218883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Elmslie F, Gardiner M. Genetics of the epilepsies. Curr Opin Neurol. 1995;8(2):126–129. doi: 10.1097/00019052-199504000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bakker MJ, van Dijk JG, van den Maagdenberg AMJM, Tijssen MAJ. Startle syndromes. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(6):513–524. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70470-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Conroy J, McGettigan PA, McCreary D, Shah N, Collins K, Parry-Fielder B, et al. Towards the identification of a genetic basis for Landau-Kleffner syndrome. Epilepsia. 2014;55(6):858–865. doi: 10.1111/epi.12645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dong L, Chen Y, Lewis M, Hsieh JC, Reing J, Chaillet JR, et al. Neurologic defects and selective disruption of basement membranes in mice lacking entactin-1/nidogen-1. Lab Investig. 2002;82(12):1617–1630. doi: 10.1097/01.LAB.0000042240.52093.0F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fong CY, Mumford AD, Likeman MJ, Jardine PE. Cerebral palsy in siblings caused by compound heterozygous mutations in the gene encoding protein C. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(5):489–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03618.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Thevenon J, Milh M, Feillet F, St-Onge J, Duffourd Y, Juge C, et al. Mutations in SLC13A5 cause autosomal-recessive epileptic encephalopathy with seizure onset in the first days of life. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;95(1):113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hardies K, de Kovel CG, Weckhuysen S, Asselbergh B, Geuens T, Deconinck T, et al. Recessive mutations in SLC13A5 result in a loss of citrate transport and cause neonatal epilepsy, developmental delay and teeth hypoplasia. Brain. 2015;138(Pt 11):3238–3250. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zeng WQ, Al-Yamani E, Acierno JS, Jr, Slaugenhaupt S, Gillis T, MacDonald ME, et al. Biotin-responsive basal ganglia disease maps to 2q36.3 and is due to mutations in SLC19A3. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;77(1):16–26. doi: 10.1086/431216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Roll P, Rudolf G, Pereira S, Royer B, Scheffer IE, Massacrier A, et al. SRPX2 mutations in disorders of language cortex and cognition. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15(7):1195–1207. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hildebrand MS, Myers CT, Carvill GL, Regan BM, Damiano JA, Mullen SA, et al. A targeted resequencing gene panel for focal epilepsy. Nerology. 2016;86(17):1605–1612. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Parrini E, Marini C, Mei D, Galuppi A, Cellini E, Pucatti D, et al. Diagnostic targeted resequencing in 349 patients with drug-resistant pediatric epilepsies identifies causative mutations in 30 different genes. Hum Mutat. 2017;38(2):216–225. doi: 10.1002/humu.23149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Carvill GL, Heavin SB, Yendle SC, McMahon JM, O'Roak BJ, Cook J, et al. Targeted resequencing in epileptic encephalopathies identifies de novo mutations in CHD2 and SYNGAP1. Nat Genet. 2013;45(7):825–830. doi: 10.1038/ng.2646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Trump N, McTague A, Brittain H, Papandreou A, Meyer E, Ngoh A, et al. Improving diagnosis and broadening the phenotypes in early-onset seizure and severe developmental delay disorders through gene panel analysis. J Med Genet. 2016;53(5):310–317. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lemke JR, Riesch E, Scheurenbrand T, Schubach M, Wilhelm C, Steiner I, et al. Targeted next generation sequencing as a diagnostic tool in epileptic disorders. Epilepsia. 2012;53(8):1387–1398. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03516.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Møller RS, Larsen LH, Johannesen KM, Talvik I, Talvik T, Vaher U, et al. Gene panel testing in epileptic encephalopathies and familial epilepsies. Mol Syndromol. 2016;7(4):210–219. doi: 10.1159/000448369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kodera H, Kato M, Nord AS, Walsh T, Lee M, Yamanaka G, et al. Targeted capture and sequencing for detection of mutations causing early onset epileptic encephalopathy. Epilepsia. 2013;54(7):1262–1269. doi: 10.1111/epi.12203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ortega-Moreno L, Giráldez BG, Soto-Insuga V, Losada-Del Pozo R, Rodrigo-Moreno M, Alarcón-Morcillo C, et al. Molecular diagnosis of patients with epilepsy and developmental delay using a customized panel of epilepsy genes. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0188978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Meisler MH, Kearney JA. Sodium channel mutations in epilepsy and other neurological disorders. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(8):2010–2017. doi: 10.1172/JCI25466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mao X, Li K, Tang B, Luo Y, Ding D, Zhao Y, et al. Novel mutations in ADSL for Adenylosuccinate Lyase deficiency identified by the combination of trio-WES and constantly updated guidelines. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1625. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01637-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Jurecka A, Zikanova M, Kmoch S, Tylki-Szymańska A. Adenylosuccinate lyase deficiency. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2015;38(2):231–242. doi: 10.1007/s10545-014-9755-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Chen BC, McGown IN, Thong MK, Pitt J, Yunus ZM, Khoo TB, et al. Adenylosuccinate lyase deficiency in a Malaysian patient, with novel adenylosuccinate lyase gene mutations. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010;33(Suppl 3):S159–S162. doi: 10.1007/s10545-010-9056-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hamdan FF, Gauthier J, Spiegelman D, Noreau A, Yang Y, Pellerin S, et al. Mutations in SYNGAP1 in autosomal nonsyndromic mental retardation. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(6):599–605. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Berryer MH, Hamdan FF, Klitten LL, Møller RS, Carmant L, Schwartzentruber J, et al. Mutations in SYNGAP1 cause intellectual disability, autism, and a specific form of epilepsy by inducing haploinsufficiency. Hum Mutat. 2013;34(2):385–394. doi: 10.1002/humu.22248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Amir RE, Van den Veyver IB, Wan M, Tran CQ, Francke U, Zoghbi HY. Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MECP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2. Nat Genet. 1999;23:185–188. doi: 10.1038/13810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hasbani DM, Crino PB. Tuberous sclerosis complex. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;148:813–822. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64076-5.00052-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhang H, Nanba E, Yamamoto T, Ninomiya H, Ohno K, Mizuguchi M, et al. Mutational analysis of TSC1 and TSC2 genes in Japanese patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. J Hum Genet. 1999;44(6):391–396. doi: 10.1007/s100380050185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wilson PJ, Ramesh V, Kristiansen A, Bove C, Jozwiak S, Kwiatkowski DJ, et al. Novel mutations detected in the TSC2 gene from both sporadic and familial TSC patients. Hum Mol Genet. 1996;5(2):249–256. doi: 10.1093/hmg/5.2.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hoogeveen-Westerveld M, Wentink M, van den Heuvel D, Mozaffari M, Ekong R, Povey S, et al. Functional assessment of variants in the TSC1 and TSC2 genes identified in individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex. Hum Mutat. 2011;32(4):424–435. doi: 10.1002/humu.21451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gilboa T, Segel R, Zeligson S, Alterescu G, Ben-Pazi H. Ganglioglioma, epilepsy, and intellectual impairment due to familial TSC1 deletion. J Child Neurol. 2018;33(7):482–486. doi: 10.1177/0883073818767036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wagnon JL, Meisler MH. Recurrent and non-recurrent mutations of SCN8A in epileptic encephalopathy. Front Neurol. 2015;6(104) 10.3389/fneur.2015.00104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 70.Zerem A, Haginoya K, Lev D, Blumkin L, Kivity S, Linder I, et al. The molecular and phenotypic spectrum of IQSEC2-related epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2016;57(11):1858–1869. doi: 10.1111/epi.13560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wilmshurst JM, Berg AT, Lagae L, Newton CR, Cross JH. The challenges and innovations for therapy in children with epilepsy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(5):249–260. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Oyrer J, Maljevic S, Scheffer IE, Berkovic SF, Petrou S, Reid CA. Ion channels in genetic epilepsy: from genes and mechanisms to disease-targeted therapies. Pharmacol Rev. 2018;70(1):142–173. doi: 10.1124/pr.117.014456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Orsini A, Zara F, Striano P. Recent advances in epilepsy genetics. Neurosci Lett. 2018;667:4–9. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Weber YG, Biskup S, Helbig KL, Von Spiczak S, Lerche H. The role of genetic testing in epilepsy diagnosis and management. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2017;17(8):739–750. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2017.1335598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wang J, Lin ZJ, Liu L, Xu HQ, Shi YW, Yi YH, et al. Epilepsy-associated genes. Seizure. 2017;44:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Samarasinghe TD, Sands SA, Skuza EM, Joshi MS, Nold-Petry CA, Berger PJ. The effect of prenatal maternal infection on respiratory function in mouse offspring: evidence for enhanced chemosensitivity. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2015;119(3):299–307. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01105.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Catterall WA, Goldin AL, Waxman SG. International Union of Pharmacology. XLVII. Nomenclature and structure-function relationships of voltage-gated sodium channels. Pharmacol Rev. 2005;57(4):397–409. doi: 10.1124/pr.57.4.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Oliva M, Berkovic SF, Petrou S. Sodium channels and the neurobiology of epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2012;53(11):1849–1859. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03631.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.McDonald CL, Saneto RP, Carmant L, Sotero de Menezes MA. Focal seizures in patients with SCN1A mutations. J Child Neurol. 2017;32(2):170–176. doi: 10.1177/0883073816672379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Depienne C, Trouillard O, Gourfinkel-An I, Saint-Martin C, Bouteiller D, Graber D, et al. Mechanisms for variable expressivity of inherited SCN1A mutations causing Dravet syndrome. J Med Genet. 2010;47(6):404–410. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2009.074328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Poduri A, Evrony GD, Cai X, Elhosary PC, Beroukhim R, Lehtinen MK, et al. Somatic activation of AKT3 causes hemispheric developmental brain malformations. Neuron. 2012;74(1):41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hawkins NA, Anderson LL, Gertler TS, Laux L, George AL, Jr, Kearney JA. Screening of conventional anticonvulsants in a genetic mouse model of epilepsy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2017;4(5):326–339. doi: 10.1002/acn3.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Chiron C, Dulac O. The pharmacologic treatment of Dravet syndrome. Epilepsia. 2011;52(Suppl 2):72–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03007.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Cao D, Ohtani H, Ogiwara I, Ohtani S, Takahashi Y, Yamakawa K, et al. Efficacy of stiripentol in hyperthermia-induced seizures in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome. Epilepsia. 2012;53(7):1140–1145. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03497.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Oakley JC, Cho AR, Cheah CS, Scheuer T, Catterall WA. Synergistic GABA-enhancing therapy against seizures in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2013;345(2):215–224. doi: 10.1124/jpet.113.203331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Di Meglio C, Lesca G, Villeneuve N, Lacoste C, Abidi A, Cacciagli P, et al. Epileptic patients with de novo STXBP1 mutations: key clinical features based on 24 cases. Epilepsia. 2015;56(12):1931–1940. doi: 10.1111/epi.13214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ko A, Youn SE, Kim SH, Lee JS, Kim S, Choi JR, et al. Targeted gene panel and genotype-phenotype correlation in children with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Epilepsy Res. 2018;141:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ohba C, Kato M, Takahashi N, Osaka H, Shiihara T, Tohyama J, et al. De novo KCNT1 mutations in early-onset epileptic encephalopathy. Epilepsia. 2015;56(9):e121–e128. doi: 10.1111/epi.13072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Fukuoka M, Kuki I, Kawawaki H, Okazaki S, Kim K, Hattori Y, et al. Quinidine therapy for West syndrome with KCNTI mutation: a case report. Brain Dev. 2017;39(1):80–83. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2016.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Leonard H, Cobb S, Downs J. Clinical and biological progress over 50 years in Rett syndrome. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(1):37–51. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Zhou P, He N, Zhang JW, Lin ZJ, Wang J, Yan LM, et al. Novel mutations and phenotypes of epilepsy-associated genes in epileptic encephalopathies. Genes Brain Behav. 2018. 10.1111/gbb.12456 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 92.Daci A, Bozalija A, Jashari F, Krasniqi S. Individualizing treatment approaches for epileptic patients with glucose transporter type1 (GLUT-1) deficiency. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(1):122. doi: 10.3390/ijms19010122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ku CS, Polychronakos C, Tan EK, Naidoo N, Pawitan Y, Roukos DH, et al. A new paradigm emerges from the study of de novo mutations in the context of neurodevelopmental disease. Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18(2):141–153. doi: 10.1038/mp.2012.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Veltman JA, Brunner HG. De novo mutations in human genetic disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(8):565–575. doi: 10.1038/nrg3241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Hirose S, Scheffer IE, Marini C, De Jonghe P, Andermann E, Goldman AM, et al. SCN1A testing for epilepsy: application in clinical practice. Epilepsia. 2013;54(5):946–952. doi: 10.1111/epi.12168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kammoun F. Screening of MECP2 coding sequence in patients with phenotypes of decreasing likelihood for Rett syndrome: a cohort of 171 cases. J Med Genet. 2004;41(6):e85. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2003.014480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Avgeris S, Fostira F, Vagena A, Ninios Y, Delimitsou A, Vodicka R, et al. Mutational analysis of TSC1 and TSC2 genes in tuberous sclerosis complex patients from Greece. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16697. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16988-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Steel D, Symonds JD, Zuberi SM, Brunklaus A. Dravet syndrome and its mimics: beyond SCN1A. Epilepsia. 2017;58(11):1807–1816. doi: 10.1111/epi.13889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Guerrini R, Parrini E. Epilepsy in Rett syndrome, and CDKL5- and FOXG1-gene-related encephalopathies. Epilepsia. 2012;53(12):2067–2078. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03656.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Curatolo P, Bombardieri R, Jozwiak S. Tuberous sclerosis. Lancet. 2008;372(9639):657–668. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61279-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Depienne C, Trouillard O, Saint-Martin C, Gourfinkel-An I, Bouteiller D, Carpentier W, et al. Spectrum of SCN1A gene mutations associated with Dravet syndrome: analysis of 333 patients. J Med Genet. 2009;46(3):183–191. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2008.062323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Nabbout R, Gennaro E, Dalla Bernardina B, Dulac O, Madia F, Bertini E, et al. Spectrum of SCN1A mutations in severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy. Neurology. 2003;60(12):1961–1967. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000069463.41870.2F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Harkin LA, McMahon JM, Iona X, Dibbens L, Pelekanos JT, Zuberi SM, et al. The spectrum of SCN1A-related infantile epileptic encephalopathies. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 3):843–852. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Fukuma G, Oguni H, Shirasaka Y, Watanabe K, Miyajima T, Yasumoto S, et al. Mutations of neuronal voltage-gated Na+ channel alpha 1 subunit gene SCN1A in core severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy (SMEI) and in borderline SMEI (SMEB) Epilepsia. 2004;45(2):140–148. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.15103.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Saitsu H, Kato M, Koide A, Goto T, Fujita T, Nishiyama K, et al. Whole exome sequencing identifies KCNQ2 mutations in Ohtahara syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2012;72(2):298–300. doi: 10.1002/ana.23620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Ishii A, Shioda M, Okumura A, Kidokoro H, Sakauchi M, Shimada S, et al. A recurrent KCNT1 mutation in two sporadic cases with malignant migrating partial seizures in infancy. Gene. 2013;531(2):467–471. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.08.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Mayer K, Ballhausen W, Rott HD. Mutation screening of the entire coding regions of the TSC1 and the TSC2 gene with the protein truncation test (PTT) identifies frequent splicing defects. Hum Mutat. 1999;14:401–411. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(199911)14:5&#x0003c;401::AID-HUMU6&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Gardella E, Becker F, Møller RS, Schubert J, Lemke JR, Larsen LH, et al. Benign infantile seizures and paroxysmal dyskinesia caused by an SCN8A mutation. Ann Neurol. 2016;79(3):428–436. doi: 10.1002/ana.24580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Epi4K Consortium De novo mutations in SLC1A2 and CACNA1A are important causes of epileptic encephalopathies. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99(2):287–298. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Larsen J, Carvill GL, Gardella E, Kluger G, Schmiedel G, Barisic N, et al. The phenotypic spectrum of SCN8A encephalopathy. Neurology. 2015;84(5):480–489. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Hirouchi M, Suzuki H, Itoda M, Ozawa S, Sawada J-i, Ieiri I, et al. Characterization of the cellular localization, expression level, and function of SNP variants of MRP2/ABCC2. Pharm Res. 2004;21(5):742–748. doi: 10.1023/B:PHAM.0000026422.06207.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Fokstuen S, Makrythanasis P, Hammar E, Guipponi M, Ranza E, Varvagiannis K, et al. Experience of a multidisciplinary task force with exome sequencing for Mendelian disorders. Hum Genomics. 2016;10(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40246-016-0080-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional file 1: (76.6KB, docx)

Table S1. The expression levels of the 153 targeted genes in brain. Table S2. The quality assurance (QA) /quality control (QC) of targeted sequencing. Table S3. The frequencies of different mutation locations in SCN1A gene and their corresponding phenotypes in Dravet syndrome patients. Table S4. The frequencies of different mutation types in SCN1A gene and their corresponding phenotypes in Dravet syndrome patients. (DOCX 98 kb)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Molecular Brain are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES