Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 23.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Microbiol. 2018 Apr 23;3(6):662–669. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0150-6

Microbiota Accessible Carbohydrates Suppress Clostridium difficile Infection in a Murine Model

Andrew J Hryckowian 1, William Van Treuren 1, Samuel A Smits 1, Nicole M Davis 1, Jackson O Gardner 1, Donna M Bouley 2, Justin L Sonnenburg 1,*
PMCID: PMC6126909  NIHMSID: NIHMS953590  PMID: 29686297

Clostridium difficile (Cd) is an opportunistic diarrheal pathogen and Cd infection (CDI) represents a major healthcare concern, causing an estimated 15,000 deaths per year in the United States alone1. Several enteric pathogens, including Cd, leverage inflammation and the accompanying microbial dysbiosis to thrive in the distal gut2. Although diet is among the most powerful available tools for affecting the health of humans and their relationship with their microbiota, investigation into the effects of diet on CDI has been limited. Here, we show in mice that the consumption of microbiota accessible carbohydrates (MACs) found in dietary plant polysaccharides has a significant impact on CDI. Specifically, using a model of antibiotic-induced CDI that typically resolves within 12 days of infection, we demonstrate that MAC-deficient diets perpetuate CDI. We show that Cd burdens are suppressed through the addition of either a diet containing a complex mixture of MACs or a simplified diet containing inulin as the sole MAC source. We show that switches between these dietary conditions are coincident with changes to microbiota membership, its metabolic output and Cd-mediated inflammation. Together, our data demonstrate the outgrowth of MAC-utilizing taxa and the associated end products of MAC metabolism, namely the short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) acetate, propionate, and butyrate, are associated with decreased Cd fitness despite increased Cd toxin expression in the gut. Our findings, when placed into the context of the known fiber deficiencies of a human Western diet, provide rationale for pursuing MAC-centric dietary strategies as an alternate line of investigation for mitigating CDI.

CDI is typically associated with antibiotic-mediated dysbiosis, yet 22% of individuals with community acquired CDI have no recent history of antibiotic use3. We and others previously demonstrated that direct microbiota-Cd metabolic interactions are critical determinants of Cd fitness in the distal gut46 and that the absence of dietary MACs leads to the expression of inflammatory markers by the host colonic epithelium7. Additional in vitro work suggested that MAC-centric metabolic interactions may play a role in reducing the fitness of Cd in the gut810, leading us to hypothesize that a MAC-deficient diet reinforces the inflammation and dysbiosis conducive to CDI.

We used an experimental model of CDI in ex-germ-free Swiss-Webster mice colonized with the microbiota of a healthy human donor (see Methods). These humanized mice were fed a diet containing a complex mixture of MACs (MAC+), or two diets that are both MAC-deficient (MD) (Fig. 1a). Mice fed the MD diets show persistent CDI while mice fed the MAC+ diet clear the pathogen below detection within 10 days of infection. After 36 days of persistent infection in mice fed the MD diets, a dietary shift to the MAC+ diet results in clearance below detection within 9 days (Fig. 1a). This MAC+ diet-mediated CDI suppression is also observed in conventional C57BL/6 and Swiss-Webster mice and in ex-germ-free Swiss-Webster mice colonized with a conventional Swiss-Webster mouse microbiota (Fig. S1), demonstrating that MAC-dependent CDI suppression is not confined to a specific microbiota or host genotype.

Figure 1. Dietary MACs toggle the fitness of Clostridium difficile (Cd) in the gut while engendering distinct microbiota states.

Figure 1

Humanized, age matched female Swiss-Webster mice were maintained on a diet containing a complex mixture of MACs (MAC+, n=4 mice) or on diets deficient in MACs (MD1, n=4 mice; and MD2, n=4 mice) starting 8 days pre-infection. See Methods for details of diet compositions. (a) Mice were subsequently gavaged with clindamycin at 1 day before infection with Cd. At 36 days post-infection, mice fed the MD diets were switched to the MAC+ diet. Cd burdens were monitored over time by selective culture, as described in Methods. One of the MD2 fed mice was moribund on D10 and was euthanized. Individual per-sample Cd burdens are plotted and lines represent geometric mean burdens per time point. (b–d) Principal coordinates analysis plots of Weighted UniFrac distances between microbiota samples collected from these mice were prepared and overlaid with log-fold contour plots of Cd burdens, as measured in panel a. Clindamycin affects the composition of the microbiota in all groups of mice from D-1 (annotated with ellipses representing 80% CI) to D0 (dotted lines), resulting in a dysbiotic state permissive to CDI. In each panel, a line is drawn through the centroid of the points for a given experiment day. (b) In mice fed the MAC+ diet, the microbiota returns to resemble the pre-infection state as Cd burdens decrease. (c, d) In mice fed the MD1 and MD2 diets, respectively, CDI remains unresolved until dietary intervention with the MAC+ diet at D36, which shifts the microbiota to resemble that of other MAC+ fed mice as Cd burdens decrease (brown lines). Points are colored by the highlighted treatment group, or alternatively are retained as gray points for reference. See Fig. S4 for further explanation on generation and interpretation of the contoured PCoA (cPCoA) plots shown in panels b–d.

To enumerate gut-resident microbes that might suppress Cd, we sequenced 16S rRNA amplicons from the feces of humanized mice (Fig. 1a). The presence of dietary MACs and treatment with antibiotics affected both alpha and beta diversity of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in the gut microbiota (Figs. 1b–d, S2, S3). Two principle coordinates explain 48% of the variance in weighted UniFrac distances between samples. We traced temporal changes in the composition of the microbiota through this space. To highlight the composition of the microbiota in the context of CDI, a log-fold contour plot was drawn to illustrate burdens of Cd that correspond to these samples (see Fig. S4 for further explanation of these “contoured PCoA” [cPCoA] plots).

Clindamycin remodels the mouse microbiome to a Cd-permissive state (Figs. 1b–d, dotted lines; Fig. S3). After inoculation with Cd, the microbiota of MAC+-fed mice changes significantly, and as Cd burdens decrease, the community returns to resemble the pre-infection state (Figs. 1b, S3a), illustrating compositional resilience of the microbiota under the MAC+ dietary condition during CDI. During persistent infection in mice fed the MD diets, the microbiota composition is similar to the pre-infection MAC-deficient-associated microbiota. However, after the MAC+ dietary intervention, the microbiota of these mice transitions to resemble the microbiota of mice prophylactically fed the MAC+ diet as Cd burdens decrease (Figs. 1c, 1d, S3b, S3c). These data suggest that diet and antibiotic treatment are two major drivers of microbial communities that support or exclude Cd in our model. Furthermore, the similarities in the microbiota of uninfected and persistently infected mice fed the MD diets may be due to the metabolic and compositional constraints imposed by this dietary condition, which we hypothesize is supportive to Cd during infection.

In a previous report, in mice that cleared CDI below the limit of detection, Cd shedding could be re-initiated upon clindamycin treatment up to approximately 12 weeks after FMT-mediated suppression11, consistent with mice harboring Cd in the absence of disease and not having developed protective immunity after FMT. In our model, the persistently infected state cannot be re-established in mice fed a MAC-rich diet that cleared CDI below detection upon switching them to the MD1 diet (i.e., in the absence of antibiotics). However, persistent infection can be re-established if mice are first switched to the MD1 diet and treated with clindamycin (Fig. S5).

Having shown that the MAC+ diet, containing a complex and ill-defined mixture of MACs (see Methods), is successful in suppressing CDI, we sought to decouple the effects of MACs from other dietary components (e.g. phytonutrient12 or protein13 content). Using a simplified MD1-based diet containing inulin as the sole MAC source, the findings from our initial dietary intervention experiment in Cd-infected animals are recapitulated (Figs. 2a, S6). Furthermore, prophylactic inulin feeding (either 10% in the diet as above or 1% in the drinking water of mice fed the MD1 diet), results in dose-dependent effects on both the maximum Cd burden and on Cd clearance kinetics (Fig. S7). Taken together, like the complex MAC+ diet, inulin feeding reduces Cd burdens across experimental paradigms (Figs. 2a, S6–S8).

Figure 2. A diet containing inulin as the sole MAC source reduces Cd burdens without increasing microbial diversity.

Figure 2

Mice with persistent CDI were subjected to a dietary intervention of the complex MAC+ diet (n=3), a diet containing inulin as the sole MAC source (n=4), or were maintained on the MD1 diet (n=4). See Methods for details of diet compositions. (a) Burdens of Cd were monitored over time by selective culture as described in Methods. Individual per-sample Cd burdens are plotted and lines represent geometric mean burdens per time point. (b) A contoured PCoA (cPCoA) plot of weighted UniFrac distances between microbiomes of these mice was prepared and overlaid with log-fold contour plots of Cd burdens, as measured in panel A. A line is drawn through the centroid of the points for a given experimental day. See Fig. S4 for further explanation on generation and interpretation of cPCoA plots. (c) Alpha diversity of communities was determined longitudinally for the microbiota of these mice by Shannon Diversity Index. Differences in Cd burdens and alpha diversity between dietary conditions was determined by collapsing all time points after the diet shift time point. In the box and whiskers plot shown, the box extends from the 25th to 75th percentiles, with the central line in each box representing the median value of the dataset. The whiskers extend from the smallest to largest values in the datasets. See Fig. S11 for temporal differences in Shannon Diversity Index. Statistical significance was determined by Kruskal Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison test (**** = p<0.0001, see also Table S5).

Notably, 2 of 16 mice given inulin-based dietary interventions failed to clear Cd below detection (Figs. S6a, S8). However, a critical Cd virulence factor, the glycosylating toxin TcdB14 is not detectable in these mice (or the MAC+-fed mice that cleared Cd below detection) at the endpoint of this experiment (Fig. S6b). In one study that examined toxin concentrations quantitatively in adults, CDI severity was correlated with fecal toxin level15, ranging from asymptomatic carriage to fulminant colitis (up to 15% of healthy adults are asymptomatically colonized with Cd16). However, Cd toxin levels are typically not quantified in current clinical diagnostic procedures, which involve either qualitative assessment of toxin by immunoassay, in vitro cytotoxicity assay, or PCR-based detection of toxin genes17. This raises the possibility that MACs may play a role in limiting Cd burdens below a pathogenic threshold in carriers.

Although the complex MAC+ and the inulin-containing diets both negatively impact the in vivo fitness of Cd, the overall microbiome composition differs between mice fed these two diets, as illustrated by a two-dimensional cPCoA subspace that explains 62% of the variation in the data and the proportional abundance of taxa (Figs. 2b, S9, S10). Because increased gut microbiota diversity is associated with resistance to a number of pathogens and is a hallmark of FMT-mediated suppression of CDI6,1820, one hypothesis is that MACs positively affect CDI outcome by favoring a diverse microbiota. Though CDI suppression induced by the MAC+ diet is correlated with an increase in alpha diversity of the gut microbiota, alpha diversity does not increase when Cd burdens decrease via inulin feeding (Figs. 2c, S11a). Furthermore, community evenness is lowest in the inulin fed mice (Fig. S11b), consistent with a limited number of taxa profiting from a single MAC type21. Together, these data demonstrate that MACs significantly reduce Cd burdens but that this reduction is independent of microbiota diversity.

Despite these wholesale differences in community composition, we pursued two of several possibilities: (1) a common subset of OTUs suppress CDI across dietary interventions or (2) diet-specific but functionally similar OTUs within dietary conditions suppress CDI. To identify OTUs that are predictive of Cd presence or that discriminate between dietary conditions (Table S1, fields ‘Plus_minus_Cd’ and ‘Current_diet,’ respectively), we performed supervised (random forests) and unsupervised (non-parametric tests for differential abundance) analyses on OTUs identified in this study. All of the features identified by supervised analysis as the most discriminating between Cd infection state or diet for each comparison group (n=15 for each classifier) were also identified by unsupervised analysis (Bonferroni corrected p<0.05, Table S2). Spearman correlation analyses were then performed between these features and Cd burdens, refining a list of high-confidence taxa that are predictive of Cd burdens (Spearman ρ with Bonferroni corrected p<0.05, Table S3).

Notably, several taxa are significantly (anti)correlated with Cd burdens regardless of diet, suggesting that common microbial signatures underlie permissive and non-permissive states (Table S3). Among these, Parabacteroides, Lachnospiraceae, and Erysipelotrichaceae are correlated with Cd abundance regardless of diet. The correlation between Parabacteroides and Cd burden is consistent with previous observations that Parabacteroides are elevated in Cd “supershedder” mice22. In humans, Erysipelotrichaceae and some Lachnospiraceae are enriched in individuals with CDI compared to nondiarrheal controls23. Despite these commonalities, the majority of features identified in Table S3 are (anti)correlated with Cd in a subset of diets, supporting previous work that distinct context-dependent communities, rather than core Cd-(un)supportive communities, are important for determining CDI status24. Because others have demonstrated that metabolites, rather than microbes, are able to differentiate CDI status in humans25, we hypothesized that diet creates metabolic landscapes that are either supportive or unsupportive of Cd.

Therefore, we pursued whether MAC-mediated suppression of CDI could be differentiated from the permissive condition on a molecular basis relevant to MAC metabolism. We measured the major metabolic end products of MAC metabolism (the SCFAs acetate, propionate, and butyrate) in cecal contents of mice (see Fig S6). Acetate and butyrate are elevated in the ceca of mice fed MAC+ and inulin diets relative to those fed the MD1 diet, and propionate is elevated in the ceca of MAC+-fed mice relative to those fed the MD1 or inulin diets (Fig. 3a). Furthermore, acetate, propionate, and butyrate have concentration-dependent negative effects on Cd growth as measured by differences in doubling time (Fig. 3b) and concentration-dependent positive effects on expression of a critical Cd virulence factor, the glycosylating toxin TcdB14 (Fig. 3c). Our findings using Cd strain 630 are consistent with previous findings in other Cd strains: (i) SCFAs inhibit the growth of five non-630 strains in a concentration dependent fashion10,26 and (ii) butyrate affects toxin expression in Cd strain VPI 1046327.

Figure 3. Acetate, propionate, and butyrate are elevated in the ceca of mice fed MACs, and affect growth and toxin production in C. difficile.

Figure 3

(a) The short chain fatty acids acetate, propionate, and butyrate were measured in cecal contents of mice fed the MD1, MAC+, and inulin containing diets (n=8 per dietary condition). See Fig S6 for time points of sacrifice corresponding to measurements). Data points represent per sample concentration of each SCFA and bars represent the mean per-diet SCFA concentration. Statistical significance was assessed by ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (**, p<0.01; ****, p<0.0001, see also Table S5) (b) Doubling time was calculated for Cd grown in CDMM supplemented with 0, 10, and 30 mM sodium acetate (NaOAc), sodium propionate (NaOPr), sodium butyrate (NaOBu), or sodium chloride (NaCl, sodium matched controls) as described in Methods. For each growth condition, n=12 independent cultures were assessed. (c) TcdB was quantified in supernatants from n=12 independent cultures from each growth condition (corresponding to those analyzed in panel b) as described in Methods. Points represent mean values, error bars represent ±SEM (panels b–c). Statistical significance was assessed for each SCFA and sodium matched controls at each concentration via Mann-Whitney test (**** = two-tailed p<0.0001, see also Table S5).

Given these findings, we hypothesize that dietary MACs negatively affect the fitness of Cd in two interrelated ways. First, MACs drive privileged outgrowth of MAC-utilizing members of the microbiota (e.g. Bacteroides spp., see Table S2b). Second, the SCFAs that result from MAC metabolism negatively affect the fitness of Cd, which could be due to the buildup of endproducts of key metabolic pathways, such as reductive acetogenesis and butyrogenesis5,28. The expression of TcdB (and the co-regulated toxin TcdA) in Cd is controlled by multiple inputs, such as nutrient availability, quorum sensing, and other environmental stresses29. Therefore, it is possible that SCFAs serve as a signal to Cd of microbiome fermentation, and this signal of a competitive and inhospitable gut environment leads to an increase in toxin production.

Since limitation of dietary MACs is known to increase inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract7, we examined colonic histopathology and toxin levels to better understand the inflammation during MAC-dependent suppression of CDI. Humanized Swiss-Webster mice fed the MD1 diet were infected as in Fig. 1a and were switched to either the MAC+ or inulin diet at 7 days post infection. At pre- and post-diet shift time points, histopathology of proximal colon tissue was evaluated. Pathology was significantly increased in all infected mice relative to uninfected control mice fed the MAC+ or inulin diets (Figs. 4a, S12; Table S4). Notably, inflammation is comparably elevated in both infected and uninfected mice fed the MD1 diet, consistent with the contribution of the MD diets to inflammation and Cd persistence.

Figure 4. Inflammation and Cd toxin expression are diet-dependent.

Figure 4

Age-matched, female, humanized Swiss-Webster mice were fed the MD1 diet, and underwent experimental CDI as in Fig. 1 or were mock infected with filter sterilized PBS. After 7 days of infection, mice were switched either to the MAC+ or inulin-containing diet. (a) Mice were euthanized at time points specified in Table S4. Histopathology was carried out on proximal colon tissue from these mice as described in the “Histology and histopathological scoring” section of Methods (n=4, n=9, and n=4 for mock-infected mice fed the MD1 diet, the MAC+ diet, and the inulin diet, respectively; and n=13, n=15, and n=5 for infected mice fed the MD1 diet, the MAC+ diet, and the inulin diet, respectively). Points represent the sum histopathological score and lines are drawn at the mean score for each group (see Table S4 for individual parameters scored). Statistical significance between relevant groups was assessed by unpaired T test (*= two-tailed p<0.05; **= two-tailed p<0.01). (b) For infected mice where >5 mg fecal material could be collected (n=14, n=13, and n=13 for mice at 0, 2, and 4 days post MD1 to MAC+ diet shift; n=8, n=9, and n=6 for for mice at 0, 2, and 4 days post MD1 to inulin diet shift; and n=5, n=9, and n=9 at matched time points for mice that were maintained on the MD1 diet), levels of TcdB in the feces were measured and normalized to the burdens of Cd detected. Points represent normalized TcdB abundance for individual fecal samples. Lines are drawn through geometric mean normalized toxin abundances. For mice switched to the MAC+ diet, normalized TcdB abundance increases 14.5-fold from day 0 to day 2 (p<0.0001) and 6.5-fold from day 0 to day 4 (p=0.0066). For mice switched to the inulin diet, normalized TcdB abundance increases 8.0-fold from day 0 to day 2 (p=0.0016) and 6.5-fold from day 0 to day 4 (p=0.0426). Statistical significance between relevant pairs of treatment groups was assessed by Mann-Whitney test (*= two-tailed p<0.05; **= two-tailed p<0.01; ***= two-tailed p<0.001; **** = two-tailed p<0.0001, see also Table S5).

We also measured burdens of Cd and levels of TcdB in feces during the shift from the MD1 diet to either the MAC+ or inulin diets. TcdB is detected during persistent infection but its expression is further elevated at 2 and 4 days after the shift to the MAC+ or inulin diet (Fig. 4b). Though cfu-normalized TcdB abundance is elevated after the diet shift, the overall abundance of TcdB decreases from day 2 to day 4 post diet shift (Fig. S13). This shows that toxin expression is elevated on a per-cell basis in response to MACs but that overall TcdB abundance scales with decreasing burdens of Cd. Together, these data support a model where MAC deficient diets facilitate a level of inflammation supportive of Cd survival in the gut, enabling Cd persistence despite lower levels of toxin expression. Cd responds to the non-permissive MAC-driven environmental change by elevating toxin expression. However, Cd is unable to maintain or regain its niche in the gastrointestinal tract upon the sustained consumption of MACs by the host.

In the context of CDI, the relative contribution of inflammation to the exclusion of inflammation-sensitive competitors versus the creation of privileged nutrients, analogous to strategies delineated for the enteric pathogen Salmonella Typhimurium, remains to be determined2. Furthermore, though SCFAs can directly inhibit bacterial growth and affect Cd toxin production, additional work is needed to investigate the potential roles of other relevant factors that could be impacting infection dynamics. For example, SCFA can signal through host pathways (e.g. improved barrier function via hypoxia-inducible factor30) which may influence inflammation and microbiome composition independently of Cd burdens and toxin production; other metabolites such as bile acids can influence CDI6 and may interact with dietary effects.

Despite the individuality in the gut microbiota of patients with CDI, there is a consistent metabolic response that underlies CDI across individuals25. In light of observations that MACs profoundly alter the composition and function of the microbiota and host physiology31, our findings raise the possibility that SCFAs are a critical part of the metabolic landscapes tied to CDI status across individuals. To further address our hypothesis that SCFAs affect Cd growth and toxin production in the gut, we conducted SCFA and tributyrin feeding experiments in mice that were fed the MD1 diet. These experimental approaches are both intended to increase the SCFAs (acetate, propionate, and butyrate, or only butyrate, respectively) experimentally in the MD1 dietary condition, in the absence of MAC introduction and accompanying microbiota metabolic activity. Specifically, starting at 1 day pre-infection, mice were fed a cocktail of acetate, propionate, and butyrate in their drinking water ad libitum32 or were gavaged daily with 200 µL tributyrin30 (see Methods and Fig. S14). There was neither a significant difference in the levels of Cd recovered from the feces of these mice nor a significant difference in the levels of TcdB detected in the feces of these mice. The levels of SCFAs in cecal contents at D7 post infection also was not different between treatment groups.

SCFAs are metabolites that play regulatory and metabolic roles in the host and the microbiota, and the pleiotropic roles that they play in mediating interspecies interactions are just beginning to be appreciated. Currently, several technical hurdles exist to experimentally manipulating SCFAs within the colon, presenting a tremendous opportunity to develop methods that enable exploring this important class of fermentation end-products and their effects on gut ecology. For example, the negative results reported in Fig. S14 highlight the need to develop precise methods to reproducibly alter SCFA concentrations in the distal gut. The cocktail of SCFAs that we used was previously shown to affect SCFA levels in the cecal contents and feces of germ free mice32,33. Perhaps mice need to be provided with this cocktail for a longer period of time to see an effect (at least 21 days in the above studies) or the presence of a resident microbiome affects host absorption or microbial metabolism of SCFAs. We also gavaged mice with tributyrin in an attempt to elevate levels of butyrate (which differentiates the Cd permissive and Cd non-permissive dietary conditions, see Fig. 3a) in a more targeted fashion in the distal gut30,34 in our infected animals. In our work, we reasoned that the levels of butyrate would remain elevated for the duration of the experiment if mice were gavaged daily with tributyrin, especially given that a previous study reported elevated butyrate in the ceca of mice at 24 hours post tributyrin gavage30. Notably, a difference between our work and the previous studies that used tributyrin to alter levels of butyrate in the gut was timing of measurement of butyrate in the ceca relative to antibiotic treatment. In both studies, butyrate was measured soon after antibiotic treatment (within 35 hours post antibiotic treatment34). In our work, we measured SCFAs 8 days after antibiotic treatment. So it is possible that differences in the microbiota at the time of analysis (e.g., antibiotics depleting microbes that encode tributyrin-active lipases35 in the small intestine, enabling delivery of higher concentrations to the cecum) are the basis of the observed differences. Other factors that differentiate the experimental set-up, such as the use of a MAC-deficient diet in our experiments, may also be contributing. Previously, it was shown that MACs influence lipolysis of tributyrin in vitro36, raising the possibility that a MAC-rich diet might allow for higher levels of butyrate to be delivered more distally in mice fed MAC-rich diets.

Current microbiota-centric therapies for CDI, such as fecal microbiota transplant and probiotic administration, focus on the introduction of exogenous organisms. Our work in mice shows that dietary intervention supports microbial communities that exclude Cd without the requirement for microbe introduction. Regardless of the inter-experiment and inter-animal variations in clearance kinetics (Fig. S8), the effect is highly reproducible. Clearance kinetics may be further affected by host genetics, initial microbiota composition, or overall dietary MAC concentration/composition.

Notably, two independent human trials have shown cooked green bananas (rich in MACs as evident by elevated SCFAs in the stool of treated patients) aid host recovery from another enteric pathogen, Shigella37,38. More recently, it was shown that a MAC-deficient diet leads to microbiota-dependent mucus degradation and attachment-dependent lethal colitis by the murine pathogen, Citrobacter rodentium39. Taken together, our work is part of a growing body of literature providing evidence that dietary manipulation of the metabolic networks of the intestinal tract is a powerful and underexplored way to influence gastrointestinal pathogens.

Methods

Media and bacterial growth conditions

Frozen stocks of Clostridium difficile (Cd) strain 63040 were maintained under anaerobic conditions in septum-topped vials. Cd 630 was routinely cultured on CDMN agar, composed of Cd agar base (Oxoid) supplemented with 7% defibrinated horse blood (Lampire Biological Laboratories), 32 mg/L moxalactam (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and 12 mg/L norfloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich) in an anaerobic chamber at 37° (Coy). After 16–24 hours of growth, a single colony was picked into 5 mL of pre-reduced Reinforced Clostridial medium (RCM, Oxoid) and grown for 16 hours. This 16-hour culture was used to inoculate mice, below.

For in vitro experiments, Cd 630 was cultured on CDMN as above. Single colonies were picked into pre-reduced Cd minimal medium (CDMM) without glucose, as described previously41. After 16 hours of growth, subcultures were prepared at a 1:200 dilution in pre-reduced CDMM supplemented with 0, 10, or 30 mM of sodium acetate (Fisher), sodium propionate (Sigma Aldrich), sodium butyrate (Sigma Aldrich), or sodium chloride (EMD Millipore) in sterile polystyrene 96 well tissue culture plates with low evaporation lids (Falcon). To further minimize evaporation of culture media during growth, the 36 wells along the perimeter of the 96 well plates were filled with water rather than culture. Cultures were grown anaerobically as above in a BioTek Powerwave plate reader. At 15-minute intervals, the plate was shaken on the ‘slow’ setting for 1 minute and the optical density (OD600) of the cultures was recorded using Gen5 software (version 1.11.5). After 24 hours of growth, culture supernatants were collected after centrifugation (5 minutes at 2,500 × g) and stored at −20°C for quantification of TcdB (see Quantification of C. difficile toxin TcdB, below).

Murine model CDI

All animal studies were conducted in strict accordance with the Stanford University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) guidelines. Murine model CDI was performed on age- and sex-matched mice between 8 and 17 weeks of age, possessing one of three gut microbiota colonization states: (1) Humanized Swiss-Webster mice: female germ free mice (SWGF, Taconic; bred in house) were inoculated with a fecal sample obtained from a healthy anonymous donor, which was used in previous studies from our laboratory42,43, (2) male conventionally-reared Swiss-Webster mice (SWRF, Taconic; bred in house); or male C57BL/6 mice (B6EF, Taconic; experiments conducted on animals acquired directly from vendor), and (3) Conventionalized mice: male germ free Swiss-Webster mice were inoculated with a fecal sample obtained from SWRF mice. The gut microbiomes of the humanized and conventionalized mice were allowed to engraft for at least 4 weeks44. The fecal sample used for humanizations was de-identified and obtained with informed consent of the donor.

To initiate CDI, mice were given a single dose of clindamycin by oral gavage (1 mg; 200 µL of a 5 mg/mL solution) and were infected 24 hours later with 200 µL of overnight culture grown in RCM (approximately 1.5×107 cfu/mL) or mock infected with 200 µL filter sterilized PBS. To reactivate CDI in mice that had cleared the infection below detection, mice were given a single dose of clindamycin as above.

Feces were collected from mice directly into microcentrifuge tubes and placed on ice. To monitor Cd burdens in feces, 1 µL of each fecal sample was resuspended in PBS to a final volume of 200 µL, 10-fold serial dilutions of fecal slurries (through 10−3-fold) were prepared in sterile polystyrene 96 well tissue culture plates (Falcon). For each sample, duplicate 10 µL aliquots of each dilution (technical replicates) were spread onto CDMN agar. After 16–24 hours of anaerobic growth at 37°C, colonies were enumerated and technical replicates were averaged to give cfu values (limit of detection = 2×104 cfu/mL feces). Cd was undetectable in all mice prior to inoculation with Cd (Figs. 1A, S1, S6–S8) and in all mice that were mock infected with PBS (Fig. S8), supporting that the animals used in this work were not pre-colonized with Cd (e.g. Cd LEM1, as seen by Etienne-Mesmin and colleagues45). After serial dilution of fecal samples, the remaining amounts of fecal samples were immediately frozen at -80°C until needed for 16S rRNA analysis and TcdB ELISAs, below. It was not possible to blind researchers to infection or dietary status of the animals.

Cd burdens were chosen as the benchmark for significance between persistent infection and MAC-mediated CDI suppression. The number of mice required per experimental group was chosen based on a power calculation for continuous variables for a power of 80% and a significance of 95% according to the equation n=1+2C(s/d)2, where n = individuals required per experimental group, C= a constant based on significance and power (C=7.85), s = estimated population standard deviation, and d = difference to be detected46. Based on the burdens of Cd in persistently infected mice fed the MD1 diet (Fig. 1a, 1–36 days post infection, 60 independent measurements), the mean log-transformed Cd burden in feces is 7.58 log cfu/mL feces with a standard deviation of 0.59 log cfu/mL feces. Assuming a 95% confidence interval and 80% experimental power, 2.37 mice (3 mice, rounded up) are needed to accurately determine at least a 2-log reduction in Cd burdens from the persistently infected state. Therefore, our choice of 3–5 mice per group provides adequate power to discern when the burdens of Cd have decreased below 4.3 log cfu/mL feces.

Mouse diets

Mice were fed one of four diets in this study ad libitum: (1) a diet containing a complex mixture of MACs (MAC+, Purina LabDiet 5010); (2) a custom MAC-deficient diet47 [MD1, 68% glucose (w/v), 18% protein (w/v), and 7% fat (w/v) (Bio-Serv); (3) a commercially available MAC-deficient diet [MD2, 34% sucrose (w/v), 17% protein (w/v), 21% fat (w/v); Harlan TD.88137], or (4) a custom diet containing inulin as the sole MAC source47, which is based on the MD1 diet [58% glucose (w/v); 10% inulin (w/v) [Beneo-Orafti group; OraftiHP]; 18% protein (w/v), and 7% fat (w/v) (Bio-Serv)]. Where applicable (see Fig. S7), the drinking water of mice fed the MD1 diet was supplemented with 1% inulin (w/v) [Beneo-Orafti group; OraftiHP]. Because mice consume approximately 5 grams of food per day and 5 mL of water per day48, water with 1% inulin gives an approximate 10-fold reduction in inulin consumed relative to the 10% inulin diet. Where applicable (see Fig. S14), mice fed the MD1 diet were gavaged daily with 200 µL tributyrin (Sigma Aldrich) or were given a cocktail of sodium acetate (67.5 mM, Fisher), sodium propionate (25 mM, Sigma Aldrich), and sodium butyrate (40 mM, Sigma Aldrich) in their drinking water32 starting 1 day pre-infection. Groups of mice were randomly assigned to dietary conditions.

Histology and histopathological scoring

Proximal colon sections harvested for histopathologic analyses were fixed in 10% buffered neutral formalin and routinely processed for paraffin embedding, sectioned at 4 microns, mounted on glass slides and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Histo-tec Laboratory, Hayward, CA). Analyses were performed by a board certified veterinary pathologist, using a semiquantitative scoring system49 that evaluated distribution and severity of cellular infiltrates (inflammation), gland hyperplasia, edema, and epithelial disruption using a severity score of 0 to 5 (0 = no significant lesion, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = marked, 5 = severe, see Table S4).

Quantification of C. difficile toxin TcdB

Levels of TcdB in culture supernatants and feces were quantified relative to a standard curve of purified TcdB using the “Separate detection of C. difficile toxins A and B” kit (TGC Biomics) according to the instructions that are readily available on the manufacturer’s website. For culture supernatants which were harvested at 24 hours post-inoculation (see Media and bacterial growth conditions, above), toxin abundance was normalized by the final OD600 of the culture and “Normalized TcdB Abundance in Culture Supernatant” = [(x ng toxin) / (y OD600)] and is reported in Fig. 3c. For each fecal sample, toxin abundance was normalized by the number colony forming units, as determined by selective culture on CDMN agar (above), for each sample; “Normalized TcdB Abundance in Feces” = [(x ng toxin gram−1 feces) / (y cfu C. difficile mL−1 feces)] and is reported in Fig. 4b. Non cfu-normalized TcdB abundance (ng toxin gram−1 feces) in mouse feces is reported in Fig. S13.

16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and OTU picking methods

Total DNA was extracted from frozen fecal material using the PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio) or the Powersoil-htp 96 well DNA isolation kit (MoBio). Barcoded primers were used to amplify the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene from extracted bacterial DNA using primers 515f and 806rB via PCR50. Amplicon cleanup was performed using the UltraClean PCR Clean-Up Kit (MoBio) and quantification was performed using the high sensitivity Quant-iT dsDNA Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher). Amplicons were pooled to an equimolar ratio. Amplicons from 3 mouse experiments were sequenced in 3 different paired-end Illumina MiSeq runs, with each experiment occurring on a separate run. The sample split/run corresponds to the field ‘Experiment’ in Table S1.

For commands executed for the 16S rRNA-based bioinformatics analysis, please see Code S1, an ipython notebook. Runs were demultiplexed independently due to some non-unique barcodes, and then concatenated prior to OTU picking using ‘split_libraries_fastq.py’ with default quality parameters in QIIME 1.9.151. Open reference OTU picking was conducted with default parameters using the QIIME script ‘pick_open_reference_otus.py’ (with default clustering algorithm UCLUST52) on the 24,582,127 reads that passed quality filtering. OTUs whose representative sequence failed to align to the Greengenes reference alignment with at 85% identity using PyNAST were discarded53,54.

We removed OTUs occurring in at least 10 samples, and/or having less than 26 counts in the entire dataset. This filtering reduced the number of OTUs by 95.04% (211,884 to 10,504) but removed 5.2% of the feature-mass (23,293,178 to 22,078,743). This type of filtering removes a vast number of features that are likely artefacts, boosts power by reducing false discovery penalties, and concentrates analysis on biologically meaningful features. We rarefied our data to correct for differences sequencing depth. To ensure our results were not artefacts of rarefaction depth we conducted analyses at multiple rarefaction levels and our conclusions were not changed. We use OTU tables rarefied to 7,000 in this study, facilitating inter-run comparisons.

Supervised learning

Using the ‘supervised_learning.py’ script from QIIME 1.9.1, the random forests classification method (with 10-fold cross validation error estimation) was trained using an OTU table as prepared above in “16S sequencing and OTU picking methods.” Presence or absence of Cd in a fecal sample (as determined by selective culture) or current diet were used as the class label category, corresponding to the field ‘Plus_minus_Cd’ and ‘Current_diet’ of Table S1. The OTU table was modified for this analysis by querying each of the 11 Cd 630 rRNA sequences against a BLAST database built from the representative set of OTUs created during OTU picking (see “16S sequencing and OTU picking methods”), after which the OTUs that matched Cd 630 rRNA sequences (cutoff 97% identity) were collapsed into a single Cd OTU, “k__Bacteria;p__Frimicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Peptostreptococcaceae;g__Clostridioides;s__putative_difficile.” See Code S1 for the code used for this analysis.

Quantification of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs)

Immediately following euthanasia at 32 days post infection, cecal contents were removed from mice described in Fig. S6, weighed, and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cecal contents (70–150 mg) were suspended in a final volume of 600 µl in ice-cold ultra pure water and blended with a pellet pestle (Kimble Chase) on ice. The slurry was centrifuged at 2,350 × g for 30 seconds at 4°C and 250 µL of the supernatant was removed to a septum-topped glass vial and acidified with 20µL HPLC grade 37% HCl (Sigma Aldrich). Diethyl ether (500 µL) was added to the acidified cecal supernatant to extract SCFAs. Samples were then vortexed at 4°C for 20 minutes on ‘high’ and then were centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 3 minutes. The organic phase was removed into a fresh septum-topped vial and placed on ice. Then, a second extraction was performed with diethyl ether as above. The first and second extractions were combined for each sample and 250 µL of this combined solution was added to a 300 µL glass insert in a fresh glass septum-topped vial containing and the SCFAs were derivitized using 25 µL N-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-N-methyltrifluoroacetamide (MTBSTFA; Sigma Aldrich) at 60°C for 30 minutes.

Analyses were carried out using an Agilent 7890/5975 single quadrupole GC/MS. Using a 7683B autosampler, 1 µL split injections (1:100) were made onto a DB-5MSUI capillary column (30 m length, 0.25 mm ID, 0.25 µm film thickness; Agilent) using helium as the carrier gas (1 mL/minute, constant flow mode). Inlet temperature was 200°C and transfer line temperature was 300°C. GC temperature was held at 60°C for 2 minutes, ramped at 40°C/min to 160°C, then ramped at 80°/min to 320°C and held for 2 minutes; total run time was 8.5 minutes. The mass spectrometer used electron ionization (70eV) and scan range was m/z 50–400, with a 3.75-minute solvent delay. Acetate, propionate, and butyrate standards (20 mM, 2 mM, 0.2 mM, 0.02 mM, 0 mM) were acidified, extracted, and derivatized as above, were included in each run, and were used to generate standard curves to enable SCFA quantification.

Measurement of doubling time for in vitro growth experiments

Raw OD600 measurements of cultures grown in CDMM (see “Media and bacterial growth conditions,” above) were exported from Gen5 to MATLAB and analyzed using the growth_curve_analysis_v2_SCFA.m script and analyze_growth_curve_SCFA.m function (Code S2 and Code S3, respectively). Growth rates were determined for each culture by calculating the derivative of natural log-transformed OD600 measurements over time. Growth rate values at each time point were then smoothed using a moving average over 75-minute intervals to minimize artefacts due to noise in OD measurement data. To mitigate any remaining issues with noise in growth rate values, all growth rate curves were also inspected manually. Specifically, in cases where the analyze_growth_curve_SCFA function selected an artefactual maximum growth rate, the largest local maximum that did not correspond to noise was manually assigned as the maximum growth rate. Doubling time was then computed by dividing the natural log of 2 by maximum growth rate. The investigator that conducted growth curve analysis was blinded to the experimental conditions in which growth curve data were obtained.

Statistical methods

Alpha and beta diversity, correlations, and random forests were computed using QIIME 1.9.1 (‘alpha_diversity_through_plots.py’, ‘beta_diversity_through_plots.py’, ‘observation_metadata_correlations.py’, ‘supervised_learning.py’). Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitey, Student’s T, ANOVA, and D’Agostino-Pearson tests were performed using standard statistical analyses embedded in the Prism 7 software package (GraphPad Software Inc.). Spearman correlations were calculated in Python using Code S1 under the heading ‘feature correlations by diet’. Specific statistical tests are noted in figure legends or tables as applicable.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. The 16S sequence data is uploaded to Qiita (https://qiita.ucsd.edu/study/description/11349).

Code availability

For custom code used in this study, see Code S1S3.

Supplementary Material

1
2
3
Code 1
Code 2
Code 3

Acknowledgments

We thank Steven K. Higginbottom (Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford) for expertise and technical assistance in all mouse experiments, Allis S. Chien (Stanford University Mass Spectrometry Facility) for developing the GC-MS parameters used in this study, and Carlos G. Gonzalez (Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford) for assistance with DNA extractions from mouse feces. This work was funded by a grant from National Institutes of Health NIDDK (R01-DK085025 to J.L.S.), an NIH postdoctoral NRSA (5T32AI007328 to A.J.H.), a Stanford University School of Medicine Dean’s Postdoctoral Fellowship (A.J.H.), NSF Graduate Research Fellowships (S.A.S, W.V.T - DGE-114747), an NIH predoctoral NRSA (5T32AI007328 to N.M.D.), and a Smith Stanford Graduate Fellowship (S.A.S.). J.L.S. received an Investigators in the Pathogenesis of Infectious Disease Award from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund.

Footnotes

Author Contributions

A.J.H., N.M.D., and J.O.G. performed the experiments. D.M.B. conducted blinded scoring, imaging, and analysis of tissue sections. A.J.H., W.V.T., S.A.S., N.M.D., D.M.B., and J.L.S. analyzed and interpreted data, designed experiments, and prepared display items. A.J.H. and J.L.S. wrote the paper. All authors edited the manuscript prior to submission.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Lessa FC, Winston LG, McDonald LC. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;372:2369–2370. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1505190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hryckowian AJ, Pruss KM, Sonnenburg JL. The emerging metabolic view of Clostridium difficile pathogenesis. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2017;35:42–47. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2016.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Khanna S, et al. The epidemiology of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: a population-based study. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2012;107:89–95. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ng KM, et al. Microbiota-liberated host sugars facilitate post-antibiotic expansion of enteric pathogens. Nature. 2013;502:96–99. doi: 10.1038/nature12503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ferreyra JA, et al. Gut Microbiota-Produced Succinate Promotes C. difficile Infection after Antibiotic Treatment or Motility Disturbance. Cell Host & Microbe. 2014;16:770–777. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Buffie CG, et al. Precision microbiome reconstitution restores bile acid mediated resistance to Clostridium difficile. Nature. 2015;517:205–208. doi: 10.1038/nature13828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Earle KA, et al. Quantitative Imaging of Gut Microbiota Spatial Organization. Cell Host & Microbe. 2015;18:478–488. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hopkins MJ, Macfarlane GT. Nondigestible oligosaccharides enhance bacterial colonization resistance against Clostridium difficile in vitro. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2003;69:1920–1927. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.4.1920-1927.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Valdes-Varela L, Hernandez-Barranco AM, Ruas-Madiedo P, Gueimonde M. Effect of Bifidobacterium upon Clostridium difficile Growth and Toxicity When Co-cultured in Different Prebiotic Substrates. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7:738. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kondepudi KK, Ambalam P, Nilsson I, Wadstrom T, Ljungh A. Prebiotic-non-digestible oligosaccharides preference of probiotic bifidobacteria and antimicrobial activity against Clostridium difficile. Anaerobe. 2012;18:489–497. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lawley TD, et al. Antibiotic treatment of Clostridium difficile carrier mice triggers a supershedder state, spore-mediated transmission, and severe disease in immunocompromised hosts. Infection and Immunity. 2009;77:3661–3669. doi: 10.1128/iai.00558-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wlodarska M, Willing BP, Bravo DM, Finlay BB. Phytonutrient diet supplementation promotes beneficial Clostridia species and intestinal mucus secretion resulting in protection against enteric infection. Scientific Reports. 2015;5:9253. doi: 10.1038/srep09253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Moore JH, et al. Defined Nutrient Diets Alter Susceptibility to Clostridium difficile Associated Disease in a Murine Model. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0131829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lyras D, et al. Toxin B is essential for virulence of Clostridium difficile. Nature. 2009;458:1176–1179. doi: 10.1038/nature07822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huang B, et al. Real-time cellular analysis coupled with a specimen enrichment accurately detects and quantifies Clostridium difficile toxins in stool. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2014;52:1105–1111. doi: 10.1128/jcm.02601-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Furuya-Kanamori L, et al. Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile colonization: epidemiology and clinical implications. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2015;15:516. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1258-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pollock NR. Ultrasensitive Detection and Quantification of Toxins for Optimized Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2016;54:259–264. doi: 10.1128/jcm.02419-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kampmann C, Dicksved J, Engstrand L, Rautelin H. Composition of human faecal microbiota in resistance to Campylobacter infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:61, e61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ferreira RB, et al. The intestinal microbiota plays a role in Salmonella-induced colitis independent of pathogen colonization. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Seekatz AM, et al. Recovery of the gut microbiome following fecal microbiota transplantation. mBio. 2014;5:e00893–00814. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00893-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Walker AW, et al. Dominant and diet-responsive groups of bacteria within the human colonic microbiota. The ISME Journal. 2011;5:220–230. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lawley TD, et al. Targeted restoration of the intestinal microbiota with a simple, defined bacteriotherapy resolves relapsing Clostridium difficile disease in mice. PLoS Pathogens. 2012;8:e1002995. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schubert AM, et al. Microbiome data distinguish patients with Clostridium difficile infection and non-C. difficile-associated diarrhea from healthy controls. mBio. 2014;5:e01021–01014. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01021-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schubert AM, Sinani H, Schloss PD. Antibiotic-Induced Alterations of the Murine Gut Microbiota and Subsequent Effects on Colonization Resistance against Clostridium difficile. mBio. 2015;6:e00974. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00974-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rojo D, et al. Clostridium difficile heterogeneously impacts intestinal community architecture but drives stable metabolome responses. The ISME Journal. 2015;9:2206–2220. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rolfe RD. Role of volatile fatty acids in colonization resistance to Clostridium difficile. Infection and Immunity. 1984;45:185–191. doi: 10.1128/iai.45.1.185-191.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Karlsson S, Lindberg A, Norin E, Burman LG, Akerlund T. Toxins, butyric acid, and other short-chain fatty acids are coordinately expressed and down-regulated by cysteine in Clostridium difficile. Infection and Immunity. 2000;68:5881–5888. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.10.5881-5888.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kopke M, Straub M, Durre P. Clostridium difficile is an autotrophic bacterial pathogen. PloS One. 2013;8:e62157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Martin-Verstraete I, Peltier J, Dupuy B. The Regulatory Networks That Control Clostridium difficile Toxin Synthesis. Toxins. 2016;8 doi: 10.3390/toxins8050153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kelly CJ, et al. Crosstalk between Microbiota-Derived Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Intestinal Epithelial HIF Augments Tissue Barrier Function. Cell Host & Microbe. 2015;17:662–671. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Carmody RN, et al. Diet dominates host genotype in shaping the murine gut microbiota. Cell Host & Microbe. 2015;17:72–84. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sampson TR, et al. Gut Microbiota Regulate Motor Deficits and Neuroinflammation in a Model of Parkinson's Disease. Cell. 2016;167:1469–1480. e1412. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Smith PM, et al. The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic Treg cell homeostasis. Science. 2013;341:569–573. doi: 10.1126/science.1241165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rivera-Chavez F, et al. Depletion of Butyrate-Producing Clostridia from the Gut Microbiota Drives an Aerobic Luminal Expansion of Salmonella. Cell Host & Microbe. 2016;19:443–454. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mobarak-Qamsari E, Kasra-Kermanshahi R, Moosavi-Nejad Z. Isolation and identification of a novel, lipase-producing bacterium, Pseudomnas aeruginosa KM110. Iranian Journal of Microbiology. 2011;3:92–98. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hendrick JA, Tadokoro T, Emenhiser C, Nienaber U, Fennema OR. Various dietary fibers have different effects on lipase-catalyzed hydrolysis of tributyrin in vitro. The Journal of Nutrition. 1992;122:269–277. doi: 10.1093/jn/122.2.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rabbani GH, et al. Green banana reduces clinical severity of childhood shigellosis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 2009;28:420–425. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31819510b5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Alvarez-Acosta T, et al. Beneficial role of green plantain [Musa paradisiaca] in the management of persistent diarrhea: a prospective randomized trial. Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 2009;28:169–176. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2009.10719768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Desai MS, et al. A Dietary Fiber-Deprived Gut Microbiota Degrades the Colonic Mucus Barrier and Enhances Pathogen Susceptibility. Cell. 2016;167:1339–1353. e1321. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sebaihia M, et al. The multidrug-resistant human pathogen Clostridium difficile has a highly mobile, mosaic genome. Nature Genetics. 2006;38:779–786. doi: 10.1038/ng1830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cartman ST, Minton NP. A mariner-based transposon system for in vivo random mutagenesis of Clostridium difficile. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2010;76:1103–1109. doi: 10.1128/aem.02525-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kashyap PC, et al. Complex interactions among diet, gastrointestinal transit, and gut microbiota in humanized mice. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:967–977. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sonnenburg ED, et al. Diet-induced extinctions in the gut microbiota compound over generations. Nature. 2016;529:212–215. doi: 10.1038/nature16504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Turnbaugh PJ, et al. The effect of diet on the human gut microbiome: a metagenomic analysis in humanized gnotobiotic mice. Science Translational Medicine. 2009;1:6ra14. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Etienne-Mesmin L, et al. Toxin-positive Clostridium difficile latently infect mouse colonies and protect against highly pathogenic C. difficile. Gut. 2017 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dell RB, Holleran S, Ramakrishnan R. Sample size determination. ILAR Journal. 2002;43:207–213. doi: 10.1093/ilar.43.4.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sonnenburg ED, et al. Specificity of polysaccharide use in intestinal Bacteroides species determines diet-induced microbiota alterations. Cell. 2010;141:1241–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bachmanov AA, Reed DR, Beauchamp GK, Tordoff MG. Food intake, water intake, and drinking spout side preference of 28 mouse strains. Behavior Genetics. 2002;32:435–443. doi: 10.1023/a:1020884312053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gopinath S, Lichtman JS, Bouley DM, Elias JE, Monack DM. Role of disease-associated tolerance in infectious superspreaders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111:15780–15785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409968111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Caporaso JG, et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. The ISME Journal. 2012;6:1621–1624. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Caporaso JG, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature methods. 2010;7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2460–2461. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Caporaso JG, et al. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:266–267. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.McDonald D, et al. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. The ISME Journal. 2012;6:610–618. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
3
Code 1
Code 2
Code 3

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. The 16S sequence data is uploaded to Qiita (https://qiita.ucsd.edu/study/description/11349).

RESOURCES