Genetic engineering of T cells with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) that specifically target tumor cells is emerging as a promising new treatment for a wide range of cancers1. CARs that are currently used in the clinic consist of three domains: (i) a tumor-specific extracellular domain that usually comprises the variable heavy and light chain sequences of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) in the form of a recombinant single chain fragment variable (scFv), providing specificity to target an antigen on the surface of tumor cells, (ii) a transmembrane domain that is commonly derived from the CD8 or CD28 receptor, and (iii) intracellular signaling domains consisting of activation motifs of immune receptors for signal transduction. Based on the number of different intracellular signaling domains first, second, and third generation CARs can be categorized2. The tremendous potential of CAR technology has been proven by the clinical success of CD19-specific CAR T cells3. However, safety issues are the most limiting features for a broader application of the current CAR T cell technology in particular for the treatment of solid tumors. Mainly on-target/off-tumor toxicities against healthy tissues and excessive on-target/on-tumor reactions leading to life-threatening cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or tumor lysis syndrome represent currently the most critical side effects4. For instance CD19 expression is not restricted to leukemic cells but also present on healthy B cells. Therfore, treatment with anti-CD19 CARs causes long-term B cell aplasia in patients. Absence of B cells can be easily treated by intravenous immunoglobulin administration; however, targeting other tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) such on-target/off-tumor effects may not be acceptable5.
To overcome such limitations the previously described universal modular antibody-based platform technology named UniCAR may be used6. In this system, the cross-linkage of effector cells and target cells is not directly mediated by the extracellular domain of the CAR but via a complex of two components (Fig. 1a). The first component is a UniCAR-engineered T cell with a binding domain against a peptide epitope (E5B9, UniCAR tag) derived from the nuclear protein La/SS-B which is not accessible on the surface of intact living cells. The second component is a target module (TM) composed of a binding moiety against a TAA of choice. The epitope recognized by the UniCAR is fused to this TM in order to redirect the otherwise inert UniCAR-expressing T cells (UniCAR T cells) to the respective target cells6. Moreover, UniCAR-expressing T cells (UniCAR T cells) can reversibly be armed with one or multiple TMs. Upon eradication of all tumor cells or severe side effects occur, inactivation of the UniCAR T cells can be achieved simply by ceasing infusion of the TM. Thus, both activity and potential adverse effects of UniCAR T cells may be tunable by dosing TM infusions. According to this idea a series of UniCAR TMs with suitable pharmacokinetic features have recently been described6–8.
Sialyl-Tn (STn, Neu5Acα2,6GalNAcα-O-Ser/Thr) is a truncated O-glycan resulting from the early sialylation with α2,6-linked sialic acid (N-acetyl-neuraminic acid or Neu5Ac) of the Tn antigen, a N-acetyl-galactosamine O-linked to a serine or threonine residue in a polypeptide chain. STn modulates a malignant phenotype associated with a poor prognosis in cancer patients concerning tumor progression, immune invasion, and metastasis. STn is overexpressed in more than 80% of human carcinomas, such as bladder, ovarian, colon, breast, and prostate cancers but rarely found in healthy tissues9. Therefore, in the past decades attempts to develop effective cancer therapies targeting STn have been performed10. Yet, so far there is no clinical approved therapy. Novel technologies including CAR T cell therapies may have the potential to develop more efficient cancer therapies against STn. We therefore tried to establish a UniCAR system for retargeting of STn positive tumor cells. As some cross-reactivities of anti-STn mAbs with immune cells were described11, we first wanted to identify the anti-STn paratope most promising for such an approach. For this reason, we compared the binding of the three anti-STn mAbs L2A512, B72.3, and 3F1 (also known as HB-STn-1)13 to subpopulations of immune cells using flow cytometry (Supplementary Fig. 1). While none of these anti-STn mAbs stained NK cells (data not shown), the anti-STn mAbs B72.3 and 3F1 bound to CD4+ and CD8+ T cells but not to B cells. In contrast, the anti-STn mAb L2A5 showed some binding activity to B cells but only a weak binding to a subpopulation of CD4low cells (Supplementary Fig. 1). According to these data, an immunotherapeutic approach based on a CAR T cell derived from any of these anti-STn mAbs might harbor the risk of fratricide of T- and/or B lymphocytes. Bearing in mind that anti-CD19 CAR T cells causing B cell elimination is clinically manageable, an anti-STn CAR leading to the loss of B cells should be less risky. Thus, the mAb L2A5 appeared as the most suitable for our purpose. Moreover, a switchable CAR T cell approach such as the UniCAR technology should be preferable over conventional CAR T cells to avoid long-lasting or permanent, perhaps life-threatening loss of distinct immune cell subpopulations. In light of all these data, we decided to develop a TM based on the anti-STn mAb L2A5 for retargeting of UniCAR T cells to STn-expressing tumor cells via the switchable UniCAR platform.
As schematically represented in Fig. 1b, the anti-STn TM was generated by fusing the UniCAR epitope to the anti-STn scFv (Supplementary Materials and Methods). Following established protocols, a permanent cell line expressing and secreting the TM was established (Supplementary Materials and Methods). Purification of the TM from cell culture supernatants was accomplished by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography. The purified TM was further analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting confirming the correct molecular weight and purity essential for use in further assays7,14. Next, we confirmed the binding capability of the anti-STn TM and estimated its binding affinity. For this purpose, the binding of the TM to the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 and the bladder carcinoma cell line MCR was assessed by flow cytometry. As STn expression is downregulated in cultured tumor cells these cells were genetically manipulated to overexpress the STn antigen12. Staining with B72.3 and L2A5 mAbs served as positive controls (Supplementary Fig. 2A, left and middle panels). According to these results the anti-STn TM binds to STn-expressing cells. For the binding of the anti-STn TM to STn+ MDA-MB-231 a KD value of 73.61 nM was estimated (Supplementary Fig. 2B). As first functional evidence, we searched for a TM-dependent and STn-specific activation of UniCAR T cells. Indeed, UniCAR T cells co-cultured with either the STn+ MDA-MB-231 (Supplementary Fig. 3A) or STn+ MCR (Supplementary Fig. 3B) cell line were activated in a TM-dependent and target-specific manner. In order to analyze tumor cell lysis mediated by STn-redirected UniCAR T cells, chromium release assays were performed using MDA-MB-231 and MCR STn-expressing cell lines (Fig. 1c). As shown in Fig. 1c, incubation of UniCAR 28/ζ T cells with the anti-STn TM leads to an efficient lysis of both STn+ cancer cell lines. In contrast, in the absence of the TM tumor cells were not attacked by co-cultured UniCAR 28/ζ T cells. Besides, no killing was observed for vector control- and UniCAR STOP-transduced T cells neither in the presence nor absence of the TM. Moreover, MDA-MB-231 and MCR cancer cell lines lacking the expression of the STn antigen were not attacked (data not shown). EC50 values of 12.2 and 25.0 nM were estimated for STn+ MDA-MB-231 and STn+ MCR cancer cells, respectively. Taken together, these data demonstrate that killing of STn-expressing cells by UniCAR T cells is target specific and occurs in a strictly TM-dependent manner. For analysis of cytokines released during retargeting of tumor cells with the UniCAR T cells in the presence or absence of the ant-STn TM we used a multiplex assay (Supplementary Materials and Methods). This assay allows the simultaneous detection and quantification of the cytokines GM-CSF, IFN-α, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17A, and TNF-α. Except for GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-6, and TNF-α, no cytokines were detected at significant concentrations (Fig. 1e). Cytokines were only detected for UniCAR T cells co-cultured with STn-expressing cancer cells in the presence of the anti-STn TM, except for the cytokine IL-6. In this particular case, IL-6 was present in all conditions including cancer cells (Fig. 1e, rightmost plots). These results suggest that IL-6 is most probably secreted by the STn-expressing cancer cell lines themselves. Furthermore, cytokines were not detected in supernatants from negative controls and from UniCAR T cells in the absence of TM and/or cancer cells. The killing capability of UniCAR T cells armed with the anti-STn TM can also be confirmed using a xenograft tumor mouse model. For that, STn+ MDA-MB-231 cells were transduced with firefly luciferase (MDA-MB-231 STn-Luc cells) and mixed with UniCAR 28/ζ T cells in the presence of anti-STn TM. Tumor cells alone or UniCAR 28/ζ T cells in the absence of anti-STn TM served as negative controls. The respective mixtures were injected subcutaneously into female NMRI-Foxn1nu/Foxn1nu mice and tumor growth was monitored by bioluminescence imaging for 6 days (Fig. 1d). In the presence of the anti-STn TM UniCAR 28/ζ T cells completely inhibited tumor growth. Conversely, in the absence of the anti-STn TM UniCAR 28/ζ T cells could not hinder tumor growth. In order to show that the anti-STn TM fulfills the pharmacological requirements of a TM useful for the UniCAR system, we estimated its pharmacokinetic behavior. For this purpose, the anti-STn TM was conjugated with the chelator NODAGA (NODAGA-anti-STn TM) and further labeled with the PET isotope 64Cu2+ ([64Cu]Cu-NODAGA-anti-STn TM). Figure 2 summarizes the biodistribution of the [64Cu]Cu-NODAGA-anti-STn TM as either activity concentration (Fig. 2a) or percentage of the total activity of the injected dose (Fig. 2b) for a total of four MDA-MB-231 STn-Luc tumor-bearing mice at 2 h after single intravenous injection. The compound was equally eliminated via kidneys (12.6 ± 4.0 %ID) and liver (11.8 ± 2.1 %ID). However, the activity concentration in the kidneys (9.19 ± 2.84 SUV) was higher than the liver value (2.08 ± 0.36 SUV). The tumor to muscle ratio, representing the target to background ratio, was higher compared to tumor to blood ratio presenting values of 5.3 ± 1.3 and 1.6 ± 0.3, respectively (Fig. 2c). In addition, small animal PET was performed using the radiolabeled anti-STn TM. For that, MDA-MB-231 STn-Luc tumors were established on the right hind flank of experimental mice. The PET images (Fig. 2d, e) show that [64Cu]Cu-NODAGA-anti-STn TM clearly accumulates at the tumor. In order to assess the pharmacokinetic behavior of the novel anti-STn TM in more detail, time-activity curves (TAC) of regions of interest (ROI) were derived from the PET studies of MDA-MB-231 STn-Luc tumor-bearing mice. Representative data shown in Fig. 2f were derived from a dynamic PET study collected over 2 h and a static measurement 13 h after a single intravenous injection of ~7 MBq [64Cu]Cu-NODAGA-anti-STn TM. Based on these data, target to background curves were calculated as tumor to muscle and tumor to blood ratios (Fig. 2g). The curves show that the fastest activity clearance was observed in the kidneys with a half-life of 3.1 min (95% confidence interval [c.i.] 1.8-9.6 min), followed by the liver with half-life of 7.8 min (c.i. 7.0–8.8 min), muscle 11.7 min (c.i. 9.2–16.1 min) and the tumor with the longest half-life of 110 min (c.i. 86–154 min). The curve shapes of the tumor to muscle and tumor to blood ratios are continuously increasing. Starting with a half hour after injection the curves were nearly linearly. In summary, these data show that the anti-STn is rapidly eliminated and thus might allow a rapid on and off switch of the UniCAR system in case severe side effects occur.
Taken together, the data presented here reveal that UniCAR T cells can be efficiently and safely re-directed to STn-positive cancer cells using the anti-STn TM based on the mAb L2A5. Retargeting of UniCAR T cells results in effective eradication of STn-expressing breast- and bladder-associated tumor cells both in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, the UniCAR platform represents a promising approach for targeting malignant STn-expressing cells in different types of cancer in a controlled manner. Moreover, the anti-STn TM also demonstrates high potential as diagnostic tool for PET-imaging of STn-positive tumors.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants provided to M.B. including those by the German government (BMBF, TurbiCAR) and the DKTK, and to L.R.L. supported by the grant PD/BD/52476/2013 from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT). We thank Julia Lagler for excellent technical assistance.
Conflict of interest
L.R.L., C.N., M.B., and P.V. have filed patents related to anti-STn mAb L2A5. M.B. has filed patents related to the UniCAR system. M.B. is shareholder of the company GEMoaB which owns the IP related to the UniCAR system. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41408-018-0113-4).
References
- 1.June CH, Riddell SR, Schumacher TN. Adoptive cellular therapy: a race to the finish line. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7:280ps7. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sadelain M, Brentjens R, Rivière I. The basic principles of chimeric antigen receptor design. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:388–98. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kochenderfer JN, Dudley ME, Feldman SA, Wilson WH, Spaner DE, Maric I, et al. B-cell depletion and remissions of malignancy along with cytokine-associated toxicity in a clinical trial of anti-CD19 chimeric-antigen-receptor-transduced T cells. Blood. 2012;119:2709–2720. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-10-384388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Scarfò I, Maus MV. Current approaches to increase CAR T cell potency in solid tumors: Targeting the tumor microenvironment. J. Immunother. Cancer. 2017;5:28. doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0230-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Morgan RA, Yang JC, Kitano M, Dudley ME, Laurencot CM, Rosenberg SA. Case report of a serious adverse event following the administration of t cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor recognizing ERBB2. Mol. Ther. 2010;18:843–851. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cartellieri M, Feldmann A, Koristka S, Arndt C, Loff S, Ehninger A, et al. Switching CAR T cells on and off: a novel modular platform for retargeting of T cells to AML blasts. Blood Cancer J. 2016;6:e458. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2016.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Albert, S., Arndt, C., Feldmann, A., Bergmann, R., Bachmann, D., Koristka. S. et al. A novel nanobody-based target module for retargeting of T lymphocytes to EGFR-expressing cancer cells via the modular UniCAR platform. Oncoimmunology6. 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1287246 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Feldmann A, Arndt C, Bergmann R, Loff S, Cartellieri M, Bachmann D, et al. Retargeting of T lymphocytes to PSCA- or PSMA positive prostate cancer cells using the novel modular chimeric antigen receptor platform technology ‘UniCAR’. Oncotarget. 2017;8:31368–31385. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Munkley J. The role of sialyl-Tn in cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016;17:275. doi: 10.3390/ijms17030275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Loureiro L, Carrascal M, Barbas A, Ramalho J, Novo C, Delannoy P, et al. Challenges in antibody development against Tn and Sialyl-Tn antigens. Biomolecules. 2015;5:1783–1809. doi: 10.3390/biom5031783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bi S, Baum LG. Sialic acids in T cell development and function. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 2009;1790:1599–1610. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Loureiro, L. R., Sousa, D. P., Palma, A. S., Ferreira, D., Lima, L., Santos, L. L. et al. Novel monoclonal antibody L2A5 against sialyl-Tn demonstrating tumour specificity. Sci. Rep. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Colcher D, Hand PH, Nuti M, Schlom J. A spectrum of monoclonal antibodies reactive with human mammary tumor cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1981;78:3199–203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.5.3199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Feldmann A, Arndt C, Topfer K, Stamova S, Krone F, Cartellieri M, et al. Novel humanized and highly efficient bispecific antibodies mediate killing of prostate stem cell antigen-expressing tumor cells by CD8+and CD4+T cells. J. Immunol. 2012;189:3249–3259. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Arndt C, Feldmann A, Koristka S, Cartellieri M, Dimmel M, Ehninger A, et al. Simultaneous targeting of prostate stem cell antigen and prostate-specific membrane antigen improves the killing of prostate cancer cells using a novel modular T cell-retargeting system. Prostate. 2014;74:1335–1346. doi: 10.1002/pros.22850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.