Dear Editor,
We read the article by Sedaghat et al. concerning the investigation of corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD)1 with great interest.
This is a very interesting paper, but we would like to comment on some points.
Sedaghat et al.1 compared the results in patients with PMD to normal subjects and patients with keratoconus (KC). In the results section, they reported that in the PMD group, there was no correlation between CH and CRF with age, but they did not report their findings in normal and KC eyes. This could be interesting information because in a previous paper, Rosa et al.2 found a correlation between CH and age but not between CRF and age in normal patients. Understanding the relationship in normal and KC eyes could be very important. In fact, it could clarify if the lack of correlation between the investigated biomechanical parameters and age that the authors found is due to the presence of PMD. In this case, this could make it a hallmark of the disease. It should be noted that the patients' age ranges in the study by Rosa et al., was larger than those published by Sedaghat et al.
In the study by Rosa et al.,2 CH and CRF increased in thicker corneas, whereas the authors found no correlation between CH and CRF with central corneal thickness (CCT), but again, this information is missing in their normal and keratoconic patients, so we do not know if this is due to the particularly thin corneas or to a difference between their study and those reported by Rosa et al.
Another interesting point in their study is that in PMD patients, there is a decrease in CH and CRF.
In eyes that underwent PRK or LASIK, apart from the problem of calculating the IOL power in cases of cataract surgery3, 4 and the influence of corneal thickness in the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements that complicate the measurements,5 it has also been reported that there is a decrease in CH and CRF.6 This finding makes us wonder if this decrease simply depends on corneal thinning and not on a different behavior of the corneal structure in PMD patients.
Footnotes
Financial and material support: None.
No conflicting relationship exists for any author.
Peer review under responsibility of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology.
References
- 1.Sedaghat M.R., Ostadi-Moghadam H., Jabbarvand M., Askarizadeh F., Momeni-Moghaddam H., Narooie-Noori F. Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2018;30(1):42–47. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rosa N., Lanza M., De Bernardo M., Signoriello G., Chiodini P. Relationship between corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor with other ocular parameters. Semin Ophthalmol. 2015;30(5–6):335–339. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2013.874479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rosa N., Capasso L., Lanza M., Borrelli M. Clinical results of a corneal radius correcting factor in calculating intraocular lens power after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(7):599–603. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20090610-05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rosa N., De Bernardo M., Borrelli M., Lanza M. New factor to improve reliability of the clinical history method for intraocular lens power calculation after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(12):2123–2128. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.De Bernardo M., Capasso L., Caliendo L., Vosa Y., Rosa N. Intraocular pressure evaluation after myopic refractive surgery: a comparison of methods in 121 eyes. Semin Ophthalmol. 2016;31(3):233–242. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2014.962156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rosa N., De Bernardo M., Iaccarino S., Lanza M. Corneal biomechanical changes after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Semin Ophthalmol. 2015;30(5–6):328–334. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2013.874478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]