Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2018 Jun 4;13(7):e1044190. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2015.1044190

Role of bulk and Nanosized SiO2 to overcome salt stress during Fenugreek germination (Trigonella foenum- graceum L.)

Reihane Ivani a, Seyed Hossein Sanaei Nejad b,, Bijan Ghahraman b, Ali Reza Astaraei c, Hassan Feizi d
PMCID: PMC6128686  PMID: 29621421

ABSTRACT

The effects of bulk and Nanosized SiO2 on seed germination and seedling growth indices of fenugreek under salinity stress were studied in the College of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran, in 2013. The experimental treatments included 4 levels of salinity stress (0, 50, 100 and 150 mM), 2 concentrations of bulk (50 and 100 ppm), 2 concentrations of nanosized SiO2 (50 and 100 ppm), and control (without any SiO2 types). Seedling growth attributes significantly improved when bulk and nanosized SiO2 concentrations applied singly or with different levels of salt stress. However, they significantly declined with salt application. The adverse effects of salt on shoot, root and seedling lengths were alleviated by application of 50 ppm nanosized SiO2 treatment. Under salt stress condition, addition of 50 and 100 ppm nanosized SiO2 to fenugreek seeds increased shoot, root and seedling dry weights as compared to bulk SiO2 concentrations and control treatments, though 50 ppm nanosized SiO2 was more effective than 100 ppm nanosized SiO2 application. It was concluded that nanosized SiO2 improves growth attributes of fenugreek and mitigate adverse effects of salt stress.

Keywords: Nanoparticle, salinity, seed, seedling

Introduction

Nanotechnology is a science that nowadays has widely application in industrial and commercial products.27 Nanotechnology allows wide advances in agriculture science, such as agricultural transfer, reproductive science and technology, food wastes to energy and treatment in plants using various nanocides.10

Nanoparticles, because of their tiny size show unique characteristics. They can change physic–chemical properties compared to their bulk particles. Because of these larger surface areas, their solubility and surface reactivity was higher than their bulk particles.11 However, understanding of the interaction mechanisms at the molecular level between nanoparticles and biological systems is an unknown topic.9,16

Silicon is the second most abundant element in the earth's crust, yet its role in biology of plants has been poorly understood.4 Although silicon has not been listed among the essential elements for plants, but it can reach levels in plants similar to those of macro elements.6

Ahmed et al.4 recorded that silicon caused to reduce the impacts of different stresses such as salt and drought stresses, metal toxicity, diseases, various pests, radiation damage, high temperature and nutrients imbalance. Satisfactory result of silicon application against salt stress have been shown in fenugreek,29 Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.),6 wheat (Triticum aestivum),5 and Prospis jaliflora.

Lu et al.25 revealed that a combination of nanoSiO2 and TiO2 could increase the nitrate reductase enzyme in soybean, increase its abilities of absorbing and utilizing water and fertilizer and accelerate its germination and growth. Haghighi and others19 showed that nanoSiO2 improved germination characteristics such as germination rate, root length and dry weight in tomato under 25 mM salinity.

Salinity is one of the most important abiotic stresses for plant growth in most of the world especially in arid and semiarid area.16 Salinity has osmotic (cell hydration) and toxic (ion accumulation) impact on plants.31

A few studies have been done on the effects of nanoparticles on crops particularly on medicinal plants. In this research, we studied the either negative or positive effects of different concentrations of bulk and nanosized SiO2 on seed germination and seedling growth of fenugreek under salt stress.

Materials and methods

Nanosized SiO2 powder was as nano silicon oxide that was supplied by TECNAN (Navarrean Nanoproducts Technology) Company. Specific surface area of nanosized SiO2, Average primary particle size, Purity and True density were 180–270 m2 g−1, 10–15 nm, >99.9% and 2.2 g cc−1, respectively. Also, Pore volume and Average pore size were 0.549 cm3g−1 and 110.13 Å, respectively. The size of nanoSiO2 (Fig. 1) were determined by Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) in University of Alicante and equipment was used JEOL, Mod. JEM-2010. Bulk SiO2 powder was taken from Chemistry Laboratory of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran with 99% purity, and >230 mesh particle size. A randomized completely design with 3 replications was used for different concentrations of bulk and nanosized SiO2 under salt stress on fenugreek germination and seedling growth. The experimental treatments included 4 levels (0, 50, 100 and 150 mM) of salinity stress (NaCl), 2 concentrations (50 and 100 ppm) of bulk and 2 concentrations (50 and 100 ppm) of nanosized SiO2 and control treatment (without any SiO2 types).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Image of nanosized SiO2 by TEM.

Seeds were surface sterilized with 0.1% mercuric chloride for 30 s and washed several times with distilled water. They were soaked in solution of different concentrations of bulk and nanosized SiO2 for 24 h and dried by sterile paper. Twenty-five seeds were transferred into the each sterile Petri dish, and then 5 mM of each concentration of NaCl treatment was added to each Petri dish.

For the control treatment, only distilled water was added to Petri dishes. The dishes were covered with Slophan paper and were placed in incubator under 20 ± 1°C temperature and 70% humidity.

Germination tests were performed according to the rule issued by the International Seed Testing Association.20

The number of germinated seeds was daily recorded for 14 d Seeds were considered as germinated when their radicle was at least 2 mm length.20 After 14 days, final germination percentage and the growth parameters were determined. Mean germination time (MGT) was calculated on the basis of Matthews and Khajeh-Hosseini28 as follows:

MGT=FXF (1)

where F is the number of seeds newly germinated at the time of X, and X is the number of days started from sowing stage.

Seedling vigor was calculated on the basis of Vashisth and Nagarajan36 as follows:

VigorindexI=germination% × seedlinglength (2)
VigorindexI=germination% × seedlingweight (3)

Statistical analysis

Analysis of data was performed on a randomized completely designed with 3 replications using MSTAT-C software and the means compared by Duncan Multiple Range Test at 5% level.

Results and discussion

The results indicated that the germination of seed fenugreek was affected by 3 salt treatments (Tables 1 and 2). Increasing salt concentration caused reduction in germination parameters expected mean germination time (Table 3). The most mean germination time was observed at the highest level of salt concentration compared to control, while other germination parameters were decreased mainly at the highest level of salt concentration compared to control (Table 3). Ashraf and Orooj7 indicated that the effect of salinity on plant could be as a result of reduction osmotic potential in the medium root, nutrient deficient and also ion specific toxicity. They realized that with increasing salt concentration, growth is decreased.

Table 1.

Analysis of variance (mean of squares) of seed germination and seedling growth indices of fenugreek.

Source of Variation Degree of freedom MGT (day) Germination (%) Shoot length (mm) Root length (mm) Seedling length (mm)
Salt stress (a) 3 1.90** 80.55** 1976.84** 581.24** 4526.11**
Bulk and nanosized SiO2 (b) 4 0.30** 97.44** 881.28** 201.08** 1911.43**
a×b 12 0.021* 4.70ns 36.11ns 7.63ns 40.31ns
Error 40 0.009 15.10 24.03 15.66 29.10
CV% 7.50 4.07 10.40 12.42 6.83

In each column,

**

 and

*

shows significantly different at 1 and 5% probability levels, and ns is not significantly different.

Table 2.

Analysis of variance (mean of squares) of seed germination and seedling growth indices of fenugreek.

Source of Variation Degree of freedom Shoot dry matter (mg) Root dry matter (mg) Seedling dry matter (mg) Vigor index I (mg) Vigor index II (mg)
Salt stress (a) 3 20.36** 1.06** 30.09** 498574.30** 345914.70**
Bulk and nanosized SiO2 (b) 4 4.04** 0.65** 8.54** 218740.20** 115627.20**
a×b 12 0.12ns 0.02ns 0.17ns 5521.98ns 1661.28ns
Error 40 0.13 0.01 0.11 2827.36 1865.64
CV% 5.84 11.55 4.57 7.02 6.05

In each column,

**

 and

*

shows significantly different at 1 and 5% probability levels, and ns is not significantly different.

Table 3.

The effect of Salinity on germination characteristics of fenugreek.

NaCl (mM) MGT (day) Germination (%) Shoot length (mm) Root length (mm) Seedling length (mm) Shoot dry matter (mg) Root dry matter (mg) Seedling dry matter (mg) Vigor index I (mg) Vigor index II (mg)
0 0.96d 98.73a 57.68a 40.00a 97.67a 7.60a 1.50a 9.11a 965.59a 900.71a
50 1.12c 95.00ab 54.03a 32.96b 87.00b 6.81b 1.21b 8.03b 828.60b 764.86b
100 1.27b 94.13b 44.83b 28.93bc 73.76c 5.58c 1.04c 6.68c 694.57c 631.30c
150 1.78a 93.60b 31.93c 25.50c 57.43d 5.03d 0.88d 5.92d 539.79d 556.22d

Means in each column followed by same letters are not significantly (P < 0 .05) different according to Duncan's multiple range test.

Similar results were reported on seedlings of fenugreek, Psyllium (Plantago psyllium) and fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) in relation to effect of salinity inhibition.16,33

All of the germination parameters were significantly affected by bulk and nanosized SiO2 concentrations (Tables 1 and 2). Application of 50 ppm nanoSiO2 significantly increased fenugreek seed germination from 95.50 percent in control treatment to 99.00 percent. As a general procedure, lower Mean Germination Time (MGT) is state faster seed germination. Our results indicated that the lowest MGT was in 50 ppm nanoparticle treatment (1.09 days) (Table 4). Activation of respiratory and rapid production of ATP appears to be most important metabolic events stimulate by faster seed germination.13 Zheng et al.38 showed that significant effects of nanoTiO2 on seed germination of spinach. They referred results to small particle size, which allowed nanomaterials to penetrate into the seed throughout the treatment period, increasing their functions during the growth period.

Table 4.

The effect of bulk and nanosized SiO2 concentrations on germination characteristics of fenugreek.

Materials type Concentration (ppm) MGT (day) Germination (%) Shoot length (mm) Root length (mm) Seedling length (mm)
Bulk SiO2 50 1.24c 95.00bc 51.58b 33.70ab 85.29b
  100 1.36b 91.08c 44.25c 29.83bc 74.08c
NanoSiO2 50 1.09d 99.00a 57.62a 37.58a 95.20a
  100 1.21c 96.25ab 47.48bc 31.39b 78.87c
Control 0 1.51a 95.50ab 34.66d 26.70c 61.37d

Means in each column followed by the same letters are not significantly (P < 0 .05) different according to Duncan's multiple range test.

Azimi et al.8 said that application of nanoSiO2 significantly increased tall wheatgrass germination about 86.3 and 85.7 percent in 40 and 60 mg L−1, respectively. Also, they indicated that applying nanoSiO2 improved dry weight of shoot, root and seedling of tall wheatgrass. Adhikari et al.1 revealed that nanoSiO2 had no toxic effect on rice growth, and applying nanoSiO2 enhanced the root length, root volume and dry matter of shoot and root of rice. Similar resulted about nanoparticles were reported by Haghighi et al.19 Zheng et al.36

The results showed that even though lengths and dry weights of shoot, root and seedling decreased with the increasing nanosized SiO2 concentrations, but there was no significant difference with increasing bulk SiO2 concentrations except in case of shoot and seedling lengths (Tables 4 and 5). It seems that bulk and nanosized SiO2 in appropriate concentrations could improve the germination characteristics of fenugreek in comparison to control treatment. Feizi et al.15 realized that the growth of wheat seedling was greatly improved at 2–10 ppm nano TiO2 concentrations, but there was no improvement at higher concentrations.

Table 5.

The effect of bulk and nanosized SiO2 concentrations on germination characteristics of fenugreek.

Materials type Concentration (ppm) Shoot dry matter (mg) Root dry matter(mg) Seedling dry matter (mg) Vigor index I (mg) Vigor index II (mg)
Bulk SiO2 50 6.13bc 1.08c 7.21c 812.84b 688.20c
  100 5.90cd 1.01cd 6.92cd 677.21c 633.27d
NanoSiO2 50 7.15a 1.52a 8.75a 944.24a 867.25a
  100 6.46b 1.25b 7.72b 762.73b 746.28b
Control 0 5.65d 0.93d 6.58d 588.66d 631.34d

Means in each column followed by the same letters are not significantly (P < 0 .05) different according to Duncan's multiple range test.

Treating fenugreek seeds with 50 ppm nanosized SiO2 lead to the highest increase in shoot length by 66 percent and seedling length by 55 percent compared to control treatment. Higher root length was noted in 50 ppm nanosized (37.58 mm) treatment that, there was no significant difference with 50 ppm bulk SiO2. Lu et al.25 revealed that a combination of nanosized TiO2 and SiO2 could increase the nitrate reductase enzyme in soybean (Glycine max) and its abilities of utilizing water and fertilizer which in fact end up to accelerate its germination and growth.

Use of 50 ppm nanosized SiO2 significantly improved dry weights of shoot, root and seedling around 26, 66 and 32 percent, respectively in comparing to control treatment (Table 5). But, enhancing in root dry weight had more significant role than shoot dry weight in the improvement of seedling dry weight. It seems that nanoSiO2 facilitates water absorption and its transportation into fenugreek seedling. Beneficial roles of nanoSiO2 can be related to its hydrophilic.32 Torabi et al.35 reported that different concentrations of silicon had considerable effect on the germination rate, germination index, seedling growth and the total dry and fresh weight of borage seedling (Borago officinalis L.). Also they presented that silicon had a priming effect and could prepare a suitable metabolic reaction in seeds and promotes seed germination performance and seedling establishment.

The highest vigor indexes (I) and (II) were in 50 ppm nanosized SiO2 about 60 and 37 percent, respectively comparison to control treatment. Zheng et al.38 reported that nanoTiO2 caused to water uptake by spinach seeds and as result expedited seed germination. Feizi et al.15 revealed that the highest vigor index was in 2 and 10 ppm nanoTiO2 treatments.

Siddiqui and Al-Whaibi34 indicated that nanoSiO2 improved seed germination percent, mean germination time, seed germination index, seed vigor index, seedling fresh weight and dry weight of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill. cv Super Strain B).

In the combined treatments of bulk, nanosized SiO2 and salinity levels, increasing salinity caused a significant increasing in mean germination time, while bulk and nanosized SiO2 caused decreasing it (Table 6). 50 ppm nanosized SiO2 under zero mM salt showed positive effects and decreased mean germination time about 65 percent comparison to control treatment (Table 4). Applying 50 ppm nanosized SiO2 under all of salt concentrations and 100 ppm nanosized SiO2 under zero mM salt showed the highest germination percentage. Also, there was no significant difference with 50 ppm bulk SiO2 under zero mM salt (Table 6).

Table 6.

The interaction effect of salinity, bulk and nanosized SiO2 concentrations on germination of fenugreek.

NaCl (mM) Concentration (ppm) MGT (day) Germination (%) Shoot length(mm) Root length(mm) Seedling length(mm)
  Bulk SiO2          
0 50 1.00i 99.00a 64.01bc 42.00ab 106.01ab
0 100 1.05i 95.00bcd 52.00fgh 38.84b 90.84c
50 50 1.16h 93.00de 59.00cde 33.50cd 92.50c
50 100 1.24fgh 90.00e 50.66gh 30.00def 80.66d
100 50 1.15h 93.00de 47.33hi 30.00def 77.33d
100 100 1.26fg 89.00e 44.00ij 27.00fgh 71.00e
150 50 1.65cd 94.00d 36.00l 29.33ef 65.33fg
150 100 1.90b 89.00e 30.33m 23.50hij 53.83j
  Nano SiO2          
0 50 0.70k 100.00a 69.66a 44.33a 111.33a
0 100 0.90j 100.00a 60.43cd 40.25b 100.68b
50 50 0.86j 100.00a 67.00ab 39.66b 109.33a
50 100 0.95ij 96.00bcd 54.83efg 34.00cd 88.83c
100 50 1.20fgh 98.00abc 56.50def 33.33cde 89.83c
100 100 1.27f 95.66bcd 41.66jk 29.33ef 71.00e
150 50 1.62d 98.00abc 37.33kl 33.00cde 70.33ef
150 100 1.74c 93.33de 33.00lm 22.00ij 55.00ij
  Control          
0 0 1.16gh 98.66ab 45.00ij 34.50c 79.50d
50 0 1.41e 96.00bcd 36.00l 27.66fg 63.66gh
100 0 1.46e 94.33cd 34.66lm 25.00ghi 59.66hi
150 0 2.01a 93.00de 23.00n 19.66j 42.66k

Means in each column followed by the same letters are not significantly (P < 0.05) different according to Duncan's multiple range test.

Seedling growth parameters attributes significantly improved when bulk and nanosized SiO2 concentrations applied singly or with different levels of salt stress. However, they significantly declined with salt application (Tables 6 and 7). Under zero and 50 mM salt also, 50 ppm nanosized SiO2(54 and 86 percent, respectively) treatments, the results indicated the least reduction on Shoot length comparing to control treatment (Tables 6).

Table 7.

The interaction effect of salinity, bulk and nanosized SiO2 concentrations on germination of fenugreek.

NaCl (mM) Concentration (ppm) Shoot dry matter (mg) Root dry matter(mg) Seedling dry matter (mg) Vigor index I (mg) Vigorindex II (mg)
  Bulk SiO2          
0 50 7.44b 1.35d 8.80c 1060.13ab 880.00c
0 100 7.47b 1.23de 8.70c 863.26c 827.02d
50 50 6.90c 1.20ef 8.10d 859.55c 753.16ef
50 100 6.10e 1.07fg 7.17ef 726.00e 645.90h
100 50 5.50fgh 0.97gh 6.46g 718.50e 601.41i
100 100 5.16hi 0.93hi 6.10hi 633.96fg 548.05j
150 50 4.70jk 0.80i 5.50j 613.20gh 518.26j
150 100 4.88ij 0.82i 5.70j 485.61j 512.13j
  Nano SiO2          
0 50 8.52a 2.00a 10.52a 1113.33a 1052.33a
0 100 7.80b 1.70b 9.50b 1006.83b 950.66b
50 50 7.66b 1.56c 9.23b 1093.33a 923.33bc
50 100 6.91c 1.25de 8.16d 852.80c 784.00de
100 50 6.60cd 1.31de 8.20d 880.76c 803.92d
100 100 5.74efg 1.08fg 6.83f 678.30ef 653.92h
150 50 5.82ef 1.21ef 7.03f 689.53e 689.44gh
150 100 5.40gh 0.98gh 6.39gh 513.00ij 596.56i
  Control          
0 0 6.80cd 1.24de 8.04d 784.40d 793.56de
50 0 6.51d 0.96gh 7.47e 611.33gh 717.94fg
100 0 4.91ij 0.91hi 5.82ij 561.33hi 549.14j
150 0 4.38k 0.60j 5.00k 397.60k 464.71k

Means in each column followed by same letters are not significantly (P<0 .05) different according to Duncan's multiple range test.

Treatment of 50 ppm nanosized SiO2 under zero mM salt increased root length about 28 percent comparison to the control treatment. There was no significant difference with 50 ppm bulk sized SiO2 treatment (Table 6). Silicon appears 2 isolated functions in root cell walls, reinforcement of the endodermal cell walls in the mature basal region and keeping the young spreading cell walls extendible in the roots apical region.18 Applying of silicon seems to be quite useful to plants grown under water deficit conditions by encouraging the expansion of a big root system and keeping roots against soil drying.

Seedling length of fenugreek enhanced as a result of 50 ppm nanosized SiO2 application under zero mM salt about 36 percent compared to control. There was no significant difference with 50 ppm nanosized SiO2 under 50 mM salt and 50 ppm bulk SiO2 under zero mM salt treatment. Salinity interaction with bulk and nanosized SiO2 showed increasing dry weight (Table 7).

An increase in growth of salt stressed fenugreek seeds with the application of bulk and nanosized SiO2 in the growth medium may be due to the fact that bulk and nanosized SiO2 increasd photosynthesis rate, which was related with content of chlorophyll, activity of ribulose biphosphate carboxilase, and leaf ultra-structure.

Similar results were also presented in barley, cucumber and soybean.2,17,23 Salt stress adversely effect fenugreek growth attributes and results of current research confirm that all growth parameters decreased with NaCl salt application. Clément et al.12 demonstrated that 100 ppm anatase nanoparticles increased seed germination and root growth of flax. These beneficial effects might be due to antimicrobial properties of anatase crystalline structure of TiO2 that enhance plant tolerance to stress.12

Shoot, root and seedling dry weights of fenugreek enhanced with elevated bulk and nanosized SiO2, while decreased with NaCl application as compared to control. Under salt stress condition, addition of 50 and 100 ppm nanosized SiO2 to fenugreek seeds increased shoot, root and seedling dry weights as compared to bulk SiO2 concentrations and control treatments, though 50 ppm nanosized SiO2 was more effective than 100 ppm nanosized SiO2 application. Applying of 50 ppm nanosized SiO2 under zero mM salt increased shoot, root and seedling dry weights around 25, 61 and 30 percent, respectively over the control (Table 7).

Use of 50 ppm nanosized SiO2 under zero mM salt showed beneficial effects and increased vigor index I about 41 percent comparison to control treatment. There was no significant difference with 50 ppm nanosized SiO2 under 50 mM salt and 50 ppm bulk SiO2 under zero mM salt (Table 7). Among the treatments, applying of 50 ppm of nanosized SiO2 showed the highest values for vigor index II. The results indicated that nanosized SiO2 in an appropriate concentration could promote the percentage germination and seedling growth of fenugreek in comparison to bulk SiO2 concentrations and control.

Navarro et al.30 presented that engineered nanoparticles having high specific surface area could sequester nutrients on their surfaces and thus serve as a nutrient stock to the organisms. These positive effects could be probably due to the antimicrobial properties of engineered nanoparticles, which can promote strength and tolerance of plants to stress. Similar resulted were reported by other researchers that confirm the positive effects of bulk and nanosized SiO2 at salt stress. They observed that nanoSiO219 and silicon application40,22,14,21,26,37,29,3 could ameliorate salinity damages on plant species.

Haghighi et al.19 indicated that nanoSiO2 improved germination characteristics such as germination rate, root length and dry weight in tomato under salinity stress. Lin et al. (2004) revealed that 500 ppm nanoSiO2 significantly increased mean height and root traits of changbai larch. Higher activities of SOD, GPX, APX, DHAR and GR in salt-stressed cucumber leaves induced by silicon addition could ameliorate salinity stress damages from plant tissues, thus mitigated salt toxicity and increasing the growth of cucumber plants.39 Nasseri et al.29 showed that supplementary silicon at 1.5 mM ameliorated the negative effects of salinity on fenugreek dry matter and chlorophyll content. Also, they reported that the silicon increased the tolerance to salt stress. Kafi et al.21 observed that soil application of 1.44 g.kg−1 silicon caused an increase in the activities of APX, peroxidase (PRO), catalase (CAT), glutathione reductase (GR), superoxide dismutase (SOD) total antioxidant.

Wang et al.37 tested that applying silicon at plants under salinity stress could increase antioxidative enzymes activity like SOD, POD and CT which played great role to counter balance salinity damages. Zuccarini40 presented that silicon application leaded to balance growth reduction of Phaseolus vulgaris L. caused by salinity like decrease stomata conductance, drop of leaf RWC, decrease K+ tissues content. Liang et al.24 presented that antioxidant system stimulation and specific ion effect alleviation by decreasing sodium uptake were also environmental stresses tolerance mechanisms in plants exposed to application of silicon.

Conclusions

Interaction effects of salinity levels, dosage and size of SiO2 were studied by measuring the germination indices and vigor index of fenugreek seeds. The results indicated that the inclusion of bulk and nanosized SiO2 in fenugreek nutrition under stressed environmental conditions are beneficial, as our research showed that bulk and nanosized SiO2 significantly improved growth attributes and effectively mitigated the adverse effects of NaCl induced salt stress. We also found that the nanosized SiO2 treatments in proper concentration accelerates the germination of the fenugreek seeds and increases their vigor. NanoSiO2 improves the mean germination time and growth of fenugreek seedling in comparison to bulk SiO2 and control. 50 ppm nanosized SiO2 was more effective in alleviating salinity than 100 ppm nanosized SiO2 treatment. However, further researches are needed for a better understanding of the physiological or biochemical roles of bulk and nanosized SiO2 in higher plants at molecular level.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Mr. Dr. Rezvani moghadam and Mr. Sadeghi for offering physiology Lab. We thank Mrs. Dadi for help during test of seed germination.

References

  • 1.Adhikari T, Kundu S, Subba Rao A. Impact of SiO2 and Mo nano particles on seed germination of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int J Agric Food Sci Technol. 2013;4:809–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adatia MH, Besford RT. The effects of silicon on cucumber plants grown in recirculating nutrient solution. Anna Bot. 1986;58:343–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ahmed M, Kamran A, Asif M, Qadeer U, Iqbal Ahmed Z, Goyal A. Silicon priming: a potential source to impart abiotic stress tolerance in wheat: a review. Aus J Crop Sci. 2013;7:484–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ahmed AHH, Harb E, Higazy MA, Morgan SH. Effect of silicon and boron foliar applications on wheat plants grown under saline soil conditions. Int J Agric Res. 2008;3:1–26; doi: 10.3923/ijar.2008.1.26. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ali A, MA Basra S, Iqbal J, Hussain S, Subhani MN, Sarwar M, Ahmed M. Augmenting the salt tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) through exogenously applied silicon. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11:642–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Amirossadat Z, Mohammadi Ghehsareh A, Mojiri A. Impact of silicon on decreasing of salinity stress in greenhouse cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) in soilless culture. J Environ Sci. 2012;17:171–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ashraf M, Orooj A. Salt stress effects on growth, ion accumulation and seed oil concentration in an arid zone traditional medicinal plant ajwain (Trachyspemum ammi [L.] Sprague). J Arid Enviro. 2006;64:209–20; doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.04.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Azimi R, Jankjo M, Feizi H, Azimi A. Interaction of SiO2 nanoparticles with seed prechilling on germination and early seedling growth of tall wheatgrass (Agropyron elongatum L.). Polish J Chem Technol. 2014;16:25–9; doi: 10.2478/pjct-2014-0045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barrena R, Casals E, Colon J, Font X, Sanchez A, Puntes V. Evaluation of the ecotoxicity of model nanoparticles. Chemosphere. 2009;75:850–7; doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.01.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Carmen IU, Chithra P, Huang Q, Takhistov P, Liu S, Kokini JL. Nanotechnology: a new frontier in food science. Food Technol. 2003;57:24–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Castiglione Monica R, Cremonini R. Nanoparticles and higher plants. Caryologia. 2009;62:161–5; doi: 10.1080/00087114.2004.10589681. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Clément L, Hurel C, Marmier N. Toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles to cladocerans, algae, rotifers and plants - effects of size and crystalline structure. Chemosphere. 2012;90:1083–90; doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen K, Arora R. Priming memory invokes seed stress-tolerance. Environ Exp Bot. 2013;94:33–45.. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Enteshari SH, Alishavandi R, Delavar K. Interactive effects of silicon and NaCl on some physiological and biochemical parameters in Borago officinalis L. Iran J Plant Physiol. 2011;2:315-320. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Feizi H, Rezvani Moghaddam P, Shahtahmassebi N, Fotovat A. Impact of bulk and nanosized titanium dioxide (TiO2) on wheat seed germination and seedling growth. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2012;146:101–6; doi: 10.1007/s12011-011-9222-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ghorbanpour A, Mami Y, Ashournezhad M, Abri F, Amani M. Effect of salinity and drought stress on germination of fenugreek. Afr J Agric Res. 2011;24:5529–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hamayun M, Sohn EY, Afzal K, Khan Shinwari ZK, Latif Khan A, Lee IJ. Silicon alleviates the adverse effects of salinity and drought stress on growth and endogenous plant growth hormones of soyben (Glycine Maxl L.). Pakestan J Bot. 2010;42:1713–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hattori T, Inanaga S, Tanimoto E, Lux A, Luxova M, Sugimoto Y. Silicon-induced changes in viscoelastic properties of sorghum root cell walls. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003;44:743–9; doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcg090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Haghighi M, Afifipour Z, Mozafarian M. The effect of N-Si on tomato seed germination under salinity levels. J Biol Environ Sci. 2012;16:87–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.ISTA ISTA Rules.. International Seed Testing Association, Zurich, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kafi M, Nabati J, Masoumi A, Zare Mehrgerdi M. Effect of salinity and silicon application on oxidative damage. Pakistan J Bot. 2011;43:2457–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee SK, Sohn EY, Hamayun M, Yoon LY, Lee IJ. Effects of silicon on growth and salinity stress of soybean plant grown under hydroponic system. Agroforest Syst. 2010;80:333–430; doi: 10.1007/s10457-010-9299-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liang YC. Effects of Si on leaf ultrastructure, chlorophyll content and photosynthetic activity in barley under salt stress. Pedosphere. 1998;8:289–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liang Y, Si J, Romheld V.. Silicon uptake and transport is an active process in Cucumis sativus. New Phytol. 2005;167:797–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lu CM, Zhang CY, Tao MX. Research of the effect of nanometer on germination and growth enhancement of Glycine max and its mechanism. Soybean Sci. 2002;21:168–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ma JF. Role of silicon in enhancing the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2011;50:11–8; doi: 10.1080/00380768.2004.10408447. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Manchikanti P, Bandopadhyay TK. Nanomaterials and effects on biological systems: development of effective regulatory norm. Nanoethics. 2010;4:77–83; doi: 10.1007/s11569-010-0084-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Matthews S, Khajeh-Hosseini M. Length of the lag period of germination and metabolic repair explain vigor differences in seed lots of maize (Zea mays). Seed Sci Technol. 2007;35:200–12; doi: 10.15258/sst.2007.35.1.18. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nasseri M, Arouiee H, Kafi M, Neamati H. Effect of silicon on growth and physiological parameters in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graceum L.) under salt stress. Int J Agric Crop Sci. 2012;21:1554–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Navarro E, Baun A, Behra R, Hartmann NB, Filser J, Miao A, Quigg A, Santschi PH, Sigg L. Environmental behavior and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to algae, plants, and fungi. Ecotoxicology. 2008;17:372–86; doi: 10.1007/s10646-008-0214-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nivas D, Gaikwad DK, Chavan PD. Physiological responses of two morinda species under saline conditions. Am J Plant Physiol. 2011;6:157–66; doi: 10.3923/ajpp.2011.157.166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Romero-Aranda MR, Jurado O, Cuartero J. Silicon alleviates the deleterious salt effect on tomato plant growth by improving plant water status. J Plant Physiol. 2006;163:847–55; doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sadeghzade AD, Kashi AK, Hassandokht MR, Amri A, Alizade K. Assessment of drought tolerance in Iranian fenugreek landraces. Food Agric Environ. 2009;7:414–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Siddiqui HM, Al-Whaibi HM.. Role of nano-SiO2 in germination of tomato. (Lycopersicum esculentum seeds Mill.). Saudi J Biol Sci. 2014;21:13–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Torabi F, Majd A, Enteshari S. Effect of exogenous silicon on germination and seedling establishment in Borago officinalis L. Journal of Med Plants Res. 2012;6:1896–901. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Vashisth A, Nagarajan S.. Effect on germination and early growth characteristics in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seeds exposed to static magnetic field. J Plant Physiol. 2010;167:149–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang X, Wei Z, Liu D, Zhao G. Effects of NaCl and silicon on activities of antioxidative enzymes in roots, shoots and leaves of alfalfa. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10:545–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zheng L, Hong F, Lu S, Liu C. Effects of nanoTiO2 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2005;105:83–91; doi: 10.1385/BTER:104:1:083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhu ZJ, Wei GQ, Li J, Qian QQ, Yu JQ. Silicon alleviates salt stress and increases antioxidant enzymes activity in leaves of salt-stressed cucumber. (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Sci. 2004;167:527–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zuccarini P. Effects of silicon on photosynthesis, water relations and nutrient uptake of Phaseolus vulgaris under NaCl stress. Biol Plant. 2008;52:157–60; doi: 10.1007/s10535-008-0034-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES