Introduction
Since being first described in 1980 (1), Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is defined as the accumulation of hepatic fat, as evidenced by radiologic or histologic examination, in the absence of a coexisting etiology of chronic liver disease or secondary cause of steatosis (including drugs, significant alcohol consumption, or inherited or acquired metabolic states). The spectrum of NAFLD encompasses two subtypes: nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Isolated NAFL is characterized by steatosis (may be associated with mild chronic inflammation) in at least 5% of hepatocytes.
On the other end of the spectrum, NASH is defined by a pattern of characteristics that include steatosis, lobular and portal inflammation, and liver cell injury in the form of hepatocyte ballooning. Lobular inflammation is classically mild, characterized by a mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate. Other potential histological findings include Mallory–Denk bodies, iron deposition, periportal hepatocytes with vacuolated nuclei, ductular reaction, megamitochondria, lobular lipogranulomas, periodic acid-Schiff–diastase–resistant Kupffer cells, and acinar zone 3 perisinusoidal/pericellular fibrosis, which may be indistinguishable from alcoholic steatohepatitis (2,3). In recent years, the NAFLD activity score (NAS), developed by The Pathology Committee of the NASH Clinical Research Network, has gained wide acceptance for histologically diagnosing NASH (4). The NAS assess the degree of steatosis, lobular inflammation, hepatocellular ballooning, and fibrosis. However, the NAS does not supplant the pathologist’s overall histologic evaluation (5).
Histologically, it is important clinically to establish the distinction between NAFL and NASH, as most NAFLD patients have steatosis without necroinflammation or fibrosis and do not require medical therapy. In its more advanced stages, NAFLD can progress to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and end-stage liver diseases with related complications, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (6).
In order to understand the clinical relevance of NAFLD, to define long-term outcomes, and risk-stratify patients for disease-related complications and mortality, it is important to understand the natural history of the disease. Long-term observational studies, paired liver biopsy studies, and high-quality global meta-analysis have better defined the course of NAFLD. However, conflicting data among studies persists, with resultant persistent ambiguity in the field. This review attempts to add to the current literature by summarizing recent high-quality evidence supporting the elucidation of the natural history of NAFLD.
Epidemiology
A recent systematic review and meta-analysis has estimated the global prevalence of NAFLD, as diagnosed by imaging in the absence of significant alcohol use, to be approximately 25%, with the highest prevalence in the Middle East and South America and the lowest prevalence in Africa. Metabolic comorbidities associated with a diagnosis NAFLD included obesity (51.34%), type 2 diabetes (22.51%), hyperlipidemia (69.16%), hypertension (39.34%), and the metabolic syndrome (42.54%) (7). In the United States, data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys conducted between 1988 and 2008 estimates that the prevalence of NAFLD increased from 5.5 to 11%, with concurrent increased prevalence of obesity, type II diabetes, insulin resistance, and hypertension. By contrast, the prevalence of Hepatitis B-, Hepatitis C- and alcohol-related chronic liver disease remained stable over the same period of time. NAFLD is increasingly being diagnosed in the pediatric population, with studies estimating prevalence rates of 3–18% (8–11).
Based on data collected from the United Network for Organ Sharing and Organ Procurement and the Transplantation Network registry from 2004 through 2013, NAFLD is now the most common form of chronic liver disease in the United States and is the second-most common indication for liver transplantation (12). The same study identified that new liver transplant waitlist registrants with NASH increased by 170%; however, these same patients experienced higher 90-day waitlist mortality and were less likely to undergo liver transplantation. NAFLD is on track to be the most common indication for liver transplantation by the year 2020 (13).
Clinical Significance of NAFLD
NAFLD is thought to be the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome, defined as the presence of 3 or more of the following: (1) abdominal obesity (waist circumference >102 cm in men, >88 cm in women), (2) hypertriglyceridemia (>150 mg/dL), (3) low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels (<40 mg/dL in men, <50 mg/dL in women), (4) hypertension (>130/80 mm/Hg), and (5) high fasting glucose levels (>110 mg/dL) (14,15). The prevalence of NAFLD in patients with the metabolic syndrome (16), and particularly diabetes, is high (17,18). The global prevalence of obesity among NAFLD patients and among NASH patients is estimated to be 51% and 82%, respectively (7). In studies of patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis, greater than 60% of patients have been shown to have metabolic risk factors for NAFLD (19,20). NAFLD has also been associated with hypothyroidism (21), polycystic ovarian syndrome (22) and colonic adenomas and neoplasms (23).
Cardiovascular Disease
Metabolic syndrome is a powerful risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and multiple studies have demonstrated that cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in NAFLD patients, with NASH, fibrosis stage, and diabetes being the strongest risk factors for overall and liver-specific mortality (24–30). An early population study from Olmstead County (27) of 420 patients with NAFLD with a mean follow-up of 7.6 years, observed that patients with NAFLD have a higher all-cause mortality rate than age and sex- matched patients without NAFLD (standardized mortality ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.003–1.76; P = .03) (27). The three-leading causes of death in patients with NAFLD were malignancy, ischemic heart disease, and liver disease, with higher mortality rates observed in older patients, and patients with impaired fasting glucose and cirrhosis.
A population-based study from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) (30) of 12,822 patients between 1988–1994, 80 patients with NAFLD (defined by elevated serum aminotransferases in the absence of other chronic liver disease) died, consistent with higher overall (HR 1.038; 95 % CI 1.036–1.041; p<0.0001) and liver-related mortality (HR 9.32; 95 % CI 9.21–9.43; p< 0.0001) than patients without NAFLD. Cardiovascular events were the leading cause of death in patients with suspected NAFLD, followed by non-hepatic malignancy and liver-related death.
In a follow-up study of NHANES III, suspected NAFLD (based on similar inclusion criteria), especially in the 45–54-yr-old age group, was demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular event-related death, though the elevated hazard ratio of 1.37 (95% CI 0.98–1.91) for all-cause mortality was found to be of borderline statistical significance (31).
A recent meta-analysis and systematic review of 16 observational or retrospective studies of patients with suspected NAFLD (based either radiological imaging or histology) found that patients with NAFLD were at higher risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events than those without NAFLD (random effect odds ratio [OR] 1.64, 95% CI 1.26–2.13)(32). In addition, patients with “severe” NAFLD, ie NASH with or without fibrosis, were also at elevated risk for fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events (OR 2.58; 1.78–3.75). Patients with NAFLD also have higher rates of cardiovascular disease than patients with HCV. In a long-term follow-up study comparing the natural history of cirrhosis in patients with NASH to patients with HCV, patients with NASH had a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular-related mortality than their matched controls with HCV (8/152 vs. 1/150; P < .03) (33). The observational nature of these studies included in this systematic review falls short of establishing causality with respect to cardiovascular disease, but prompts the need for intensified guidelines regarding cardiovascular screening strategies in patients with NAFLD.
Liver-Related Morbidity
In terms of histologic progression, dogma endures that NAFL carries a more favorable prognosis than NASH, which can histologically progress to fibrosis and, in up to 25% of patients, to cirrhosis (34,35). The evolution of fibrosis carries secondary risks, including complications associated with portal hypertension (ascites, variceal hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy), end-stage liver disease, and HCC. Liver-related death is the third-leading cause of death in patients with NAFLD (27,28). In developed Western nations, between 4 and 22% of cases of HCC are now attributed to NAFLD (36). Lack of awareness about risk factors for NAFLD and its progression, combined with insufficient or unreliable screening and surveillance modalities may contribute to a delay in diagnosis and may explain why many patients present in the later stages of the disease (37). The burden of NAFLD is associated with worldwide increased healthcare costs and resource utilization, as well as with decreased health-related quality of life (38).
Risk Factors for Progression
Steatosis
Hepatic steatosis occurs in the setting of insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome modulated by visceral adipose tissue. This alteration of lipid and glucose metabolism can result in dysregulation of hepatic transcription factors and nuclear receptors, resulting in hepatic fat accumulation. Hepatic steatosis can create a proinflammatory environment, leading to cellular injury and necroinflammation (39,40).
In keeping with the hypothesis that NAFLD is the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome, weight gain has been associated with the development of NAFLD, and conversely, weight loss has been associated with regression of hepatic steatosis. In a sub-sample prospective ultrasound study of the first Israeli national health and nutrition examination survey (the MABAT Survey), 19% of patients who did not have imaging evidence of NAFLD at baseline were found to have NAFLD at a 7-year follow-up. Weight gain (5.8±6.1 vs. 1.4±5.5kg) was significantly higher in patients who developed NAFLD, compared with those did not. Of the patients who were found to have NAFLD at baseline, 36.4% had no imaging evidence of NAFLD after 7 years, associated with weight loss of 2.7±5.0kg, or a 5% decrease from baseline weight (41).
Pooled data from a recent global meta-analysis estimated the incidence rate for NAFLD in Asia and Israel were 52.34 per 1,000 (95% CI: 28.31–96.77) and 28.01 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI: 19.34–40.57), respectively (7). Whereas early studies suggested that simple steatosis was a benign condition that followed an indolent course (42), recent histologic paired liver biopsy studies of patients with baseline NAFL suggest that NAFL is more progressive than originally thought (43). In a prospective longitudinal study of 52 patients who underwent liver biopsy, 13 patients had simple steatosis at baseline. On follow-up biopsy at 26 months, 39% developed borderline NASH and 23% developed NASH. Weight loss (specifically, reduced BMI and waist circumference) was independently associated with disease stability and non-progression to fibrosis (44). In a study of 108 patients with NAFLD over a median interval of 6.6 years, 27 patients had NAFL (steatosis alone or associated with mild inflammation). Of the patients with NAFL at baseline, 44% of patients developed NASH, 27% of patients developed fibrosis, and 22% of patients had bridging fibrosis on follow-up liver biopsy. A similar proportion of patients with NAFL at baseline had progressive fibrosis as patients with NASH on index biopsy (45). In a similar study of patients who underwent paired liver biopsies with a mean follow-up of 3.7 years, among 25 patients with NAFL, 64% progressed to NASH and 24% developed bridging fibrosis (46). In a 2015 meta-analysis of paired liver biopsy studies, Singh et al found that patients with NAFL and stage 0 fibrosis at baseline progressed 1 stage of fibrosis over 14.3 years. By comparison, patients with NASH and stage 0 fibrosis at baseline demonstrated an accelerated rate of progression, advancing 1 stage of fibrosis over 7.1 years (47).
Steatohepatitis and Evolution of Fibrosis
In comparison to isolated hepatic steatosis, the evolution of NASH and the associated risk factors for progression have been widely investigated. In a recent meta-analysis of patients with NAFLD who underwent liver biopsy, the global prevalence of NASH in NAFLD patients has been estimated to be 59% (7). Male sex, age, weight, total cholesterol, insulin resistance, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, thyroid stimulating hormone levels, vitamin D levels, hyperuricemia, and certain genetic polymorphisms are predictors of histologic findings diagnostic of NASH (48–55). Further, factors associated with progression of fibrosis in patients with NASH include age, inflammation at index biopsy, hypertension, and low AST to ALT ratio (47,56).
Argo, et al conducted a systematic review of ten studies inclusive of 221 patients in 2009, finding that 37.6% of patients with NASH had progressive fibrosis over a mean follow-up interval of 5.3 years (56). A recent meta-analysis analysis of 4 studies of patients with biopsy-proven NASH estimated a pooled mean fibrosis progression rate 0.09 (95% CI: 0.06–0.12); meta-analysis of 6 studies of patients with histological NASH estimated a percent fibrosis progression of 40.76% (95% CI: 34.69–47.13). However, quite alarmingly, 1 of every 5 patients who experienced progression were identified as being “rapid progressors” - patients who progressed from stage 0 fibrosis on initial biopsy to bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis at follow-up (7). Unfortunately due to the nature of the analysis, factors associated with rapid progression could not be distinguished, which identifies an important gap in our understanding of the natural history of NAFLD and related fibrosis, and calls for further investigation.
The presence and stage of fibrosis appear to be the most important predictors of cardiovascular and liver-related complications. In a long-term study of 229 patients with NAFLD, Ekstedt et al discerned that patients with fibrosis stage 3–4, irrespective of the histologic NAS, had increased mortality (HR 3.3, CI 2.27–4.76, p < 0.001), compared to a reference population from the National Registry of Population (24). This data is supported by a retrospective analysis of 619 patients with NAFLD from 1975 through 2005 at medical centers in the United States, Europe, and Thailand (57). Angulo et al observed that the presence of fibrosis, independent of steatohepatitis, was associated with the need for liver transplantation, liver-related complications, and overall mortality. (57)
Advanced Fibrosis and Cirrhosis
Overall, we have more limited information on long-term outcomes and the natural history of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis due to NAFLD. The global incidence of advanced fibrosis in NASH patients has been estimated in meta-analysis to be 67.95 in 1,000 person-years, with 41% of NASH patients experiencing fibrosis progression (average annual progression rate of 0.09%) (7). Up to 25% of patients with NAFLD progress to cirrhosis (35,58), and 7% to end-stage liver disease (34). Advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis secondary to NAFLD have also been observed in the pediatric population, in up to 8% of patients with histologic NASH (59). Obesity, diabetes, and carotid artery disease are predictive of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with NASH (60–62). In addition, a systematic review of 10 studies encompassing 221 patients with NASH identified age and inflammation on initial liver biopsy as independent factors associated with progression to advanced fibrosis (56). In an early longitudinal study of 42 patients with NAFLD, Powell et al (63) observed that fibrosis progression to cirrhosis was associated with loss of steatosis and inflammation histologically.
Patients with NAFLD-related cirrhosis appear to have lower rates of liver-related morbidity and mortality than patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. In a prospective, international study of 247 patients with histologically proven NAFLD-related advanced fibrosis (grade 3) or cirrhosis, patients with NAFLD had lower rates of liver-related complications than age- and sex-matched patients with HCV-related advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, including HCC. Rates of cardiovascular events and overall mortality were similar between the 2 groups (64). In a prospective study of 152 patients with NASH-related cirrhosis compared to 150 matched patients with HCV-related cirrhosis, at a 10-year follow-up, patients with Child Class A cirrhosis secondary to NASH had a significantly lower mortality than patients with similar patients with HCV (3/74 vs. 15/75; p<0.004), as well as a lower risk of decompensation (p<0.007). Similar mortality rates were observed in patients with Child Class B or C cirrhosis across groups. Patients with NASH had lower rates of ascites development, hyperbilirubinemia and HCC than comparable HCV patients(33). An earlier, similar study from Hui et al observed similar liver-related complication and overall mortality rates between patients with NASH-related cirrhosis and HCV-related cirrhosis, but also observed a lower rate of HCC in patients with NASH-related cirrhosis (65).
Powell’s early findings (63) can support re-classifying a large proportion of patients originally labeled as having cryptogenic cirrhosis as “burned-out NASH.” A large proportion of these patients have risk known factors for the metabolic syndrome (19,20), and histologically, though they may lack recognized features of NASH, these findings may have regressed concurrently with fibrosis progression (19,66). This is supported by the high prevalence of NASH in liver transplant recipients who were transplanted for cryptogenic cirrhosis (67).
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Compared to alternative etiologies of chronic liver disease (for example, viral hepatitis, autoimmune or metabolic liver disease) that contribute to the global burden of HCC, patients with HCC attributed to NAFLD tend to be older and female. The development of HCC in NAFLD patients has been associated with age, obesity, diabetes, the PNPLA3 I148M polymorphism, dietary habits and drugs (66,68). The annual incidence of HCC in NAFLD patients has been estimated to be 0.44 per 1,000 person-years in a global meta-analysis. By comparison, the annual HCC incident rate in patients with NASH was 5.29 per 1,000 person-years (7). A recent Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database study demonstrated a 9% annual increase (over a 6-year period, 2004–2009) in the number of HCC cases attributed to NAFLD. The authors also observed that patients with NAFLD and HCC had a shorter survival time after diagnosis, more cardiovascular events, and were more likely to experience liver cancer-related mortality than patients without NAFLD (69). Finally, and distressingly, HCC in patients with metabolic syndrome and NAFLD has been observed in the absence of significant fibrosis or cirrhosis (70,71). As a result, HCC is frequently diagnosed at a more advanced stage than in patients with viral hepatitis, possibly the consequence of insufficient surveillance, which may contribute to the poorer prognosis observed in several studies (72).
Recurrence after Liver Transplantation
Recurrence of NAFLD and NASH has been reported in patients who have received liver transplantation, associated with persistence of the metabolic syndrome post-LT, and negatively associated with weight loss after LT (73–75). In an early series of 622 liver transplant recipients (73), 8 female patients had histologic features of NAFLD pre-LT. At a median follow-up of 15 months, 6 patients developed steatosis, 3 of whom had features consistent with NASH, and 2 patients progressed from mild steatosis to NASH within 2 years of LT. In a case-control single-center study of patients undergoing LT from 1997 to 2008 (74), 98 patients were transplanted for NASH. Recurrent NAFLD, NASH and advanced fibrosis were seen in 70%, 25% and 18%, respectively, of patients at a mean follow-up of 18 months. Patients with recurrent NASH did not develop graft failure or require re-transplantation at a mean follow-up of 3 years. In a study comparing post-LT outcomes between patients transplanted for NASH and patients transplanted for alcoholic liver disease (75), steatohepatitis post-LT was more common in patients transplanted for NASH (33 v. 0%), but there was no statistically significant difference in rates of graft failure or re-transplantation, or in post-LT survival.
Conclusions
NAFLD is a burgeoning epidemic in the United States and worldwide, and its clinical and economic impact will continue to grow with parallel increases in rates of obesity, diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome. Our evolving understanding of the natural history of NAFLD suggests that patients with steatosis may be at a higher risk for disease progression to steatohepatitis and subsequently to fibrosis and cirrhosis than previously thought. Recent studies also suggest that these patients are at elevated risk for cardiovascular-, malignancy- and liver-related morbidity and mortality, though their risk for progression, decompensation and development of HCC may be less than that of patients with HCV. Continued study of the natural history of NAFLD and its complications through the conduction of high-quality, prospectively designed studies is needed. An improved understanding of the natural history of NAFLD, with definition of factors associated with progression and long-term outcomes, will lend itself to the development of enhanced prevention, screening, surveillance, and treatment modalities.
KEY POINTS.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a worldwide epidemic, with global prevalence increasing in parallel with rates of obesity, diabetes and the metabolic syndrome.
Our understanding of the natural history of NAFLD is evolving; recent studies suggest that both patients with steatosis and steatohepatitis are at risk for progression.
Patients with NAFLD experience elevated rates of cardiovascular events and higher-than-expected all-cause mortality; fibrosis is the strongest predictor of liver-related complications and mortality.
SYNOPSIS.
NAFLD is a major etiology of chronic liver disease worldwide, and its clinical and economic burden will continue to grow with parallel increases in rates of obesity, diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome. Our evolving understanding of the natural history of NAFLD suggests that these patients are at risk for disease progression to steatohepatitis, fibrosis and cirrhosis. Recent studies also suggest that these patients are at elevated risk for cardiovascular-, malignancy- and liver-related morbidity and mortality, though their risk for progression, decompensation and HCC may be less than that of patients with alternative etiologies of chronic liver disease.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported in part by NIH grants UDK 505, P50AA024333 and U01 AA021893.
Footnotes
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
The authors have nothing to disclose.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ludwig J, Viggiano TR, McGill DB, Oh BJ. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Mayo Clinic experiences with a hitherto unnamed disease. Mayo Clin Proc. 1980. July;55(7):434–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brunt EM, Janney CG, Di Bisceglie AM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Bacon BR. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999. September;94(9):2467–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sheth SG, Gordon FD, Chopra S. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Ann Intern Med. 1997. January 15;126(2):137–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, Behling C, Contos MJ, Cummings OW, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2005. June;41(6):1313–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brunt EM, Kleiner DE, Wilson LA, Belt P, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score and the histopathologic diagnosis in NAFLD: distinct clinicopathologic meanings. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2011. March;53(3):810–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Diehl AM, Brunt EM, Cusi K, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American Gastroenterological Association, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and American College of Gastroenterology. Gastroenterology. 2012. June;142(7):1592–609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2016. July;64(1):73–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Huang R-C, Beilin LJ, Ayonrinde O, Mori TA, Olynyk JK, Burrows S, et al. Importance of cardiometabolic risk factors in the association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and arterial stiffness in adolescents. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2013. October;58(4):1306–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ayonrinde OT, Olynyk JK, Beilin LJ, Mori TA, Pennell CE, de Klerk N, et al. Gender-specific differences in adipose distribution and adipocytokines influence adolescent nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2011. March;53(3):800–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, Nuremberg P, Horton JD, Cohen JC, et al. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2004. December;40(6):1387–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Welsh JA, Karpen S, Vos MB. Increasing prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease among United States adolescents, 1988–1994 to 2007–2010. J Pediatr. 2013. March;162(3):496–500.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wong RJ, Aguilar M, Cheung R, Perumpail RB, Harrison SA, Younossi ZM, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the second leading etiology of liver disease among adults awaiting liver transplantation in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2015. March;148(3):547–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Charlton MR, Burns JM, Pedersen RA, Watt KD, Heimbach JK, Dierkhising RA. Frequency and outcomes of liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2011. October;141(4):1249–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001. May 16;285(19):2486–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ford ES, Giles WH, Dietz WH. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 2002. January 16;287(3):356–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liangpunsakul S, Chalasani N. Unexplained elevations in alanine aminotransferase in individuals with the metabolic syndrome: results from the third National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES III). Am J Med Sci. 2005. March;329(3):111–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chan W-K, Tan AT-B, Vethakkan SR, Tah P-C, Vijayananthan A, Goh K-L. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in diabetics--prevalence and predictive factors in a multiracial hospital clinic population in Malaysia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013. August;28(8):1375–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Portillo-Sanchez P, Bril F, Maximos M, Lomonaco R, Biernacki D, Orsak B, et al. High Prevalence of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Normal Plasma Aminotransferase Levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015. June;100(6):2231–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Caldwell SH, Oelsner DH, Iezzoni JC, Hespenheide EE, Battle EH, Driscoll CJ. Cryptogenic cirrhosis: clinical characterization and risk factors for underlying disease. Hepatol Baltim Md. 1999. March;29(3):664–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Poonawala A, Nair SP, Thuluvath PJ. Prevalence of obesity and diabetes in patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis: a case-control study. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2000. October;32(4 Pt 1):689–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liangpunsakul S, Chalasani N. Is hypothyroidism a risk factor for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003. October;37(4):340–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Baranova A, Tran TP, Birerdinc A, Younossi ZM. Systematic review: association of polycystic ovary syndrome with metabolic syndrome and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011. April;33(7):801–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee YI, Lim Y-S, Park HS. Colorectal neoplasms in relation to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Korean women: a retrospective cohort study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012. January;27(1):91–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ekstedt M, Hagström H, Nasr P, Fredrikson M, Stål P, Kechagias S, et al. Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2015. May;61(5):1547–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rafiq N, Bai C, Fang Y, Srishord M, McCullough A, Gramlich T, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2009. February;7(2):234–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stepanova M, Rafiq N, Makhlouf H, Agrawal R, Kaur I, Younoszai Z, et al. Predictors of all-cause mortality and liver-related mortality in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Dig Dis Sci. 2013. October;58(10):3017–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Adams LA, Lymp JF, St Sauver J, Sanderson SO, Lindor KD, Feldstein A, et al. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2005. July;129(1):113–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Söderberg C, Stål P, Askling J, Glaumann H, Lindberg G, Marmur J, et al. Decreased survival of subjects with elevated liver function tests during a 28-year follow-up. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2010. February;51(2):595–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Haflidadottir S, Jonasson JG, Norland H, Einarsdottir SO, Kleiner DE, Lund SH, et al. Long-term follow-up and liver-related death rate in patients with non-alcoholic and alcoholic related fatty liver disease. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014. September 27;14:166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ong JP, Pitts A, Younossi ZM. Increased overall mortality and liver-related mortality in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2008. October;49(4):608–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dunn W, Xu R, Wingard DL, Rogers C, Angulo P, Younossi ZM, et al. Suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and mortality risk in a population-based cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008. September;103(9):2263–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Targher G, Byrne CD, Lonardo A, Zoppini G, Barbui C. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of incident cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis. J Hepatol. 2016. September;65(3):589–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sanyal AJ, Banas C, Sargeant C, Luketic VA, Sterling RK, Stravitz RT, et al. Similarities and differences in outcomes of cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatitis C. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2006. April;43(4):682–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ekstedt M, Franzén LE, Mathiesen UL, Thorelius L, Holmqvist M, Bodemar G, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2006. October;44(4):865–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.McCullough AJ. The clinical features, diagnosis and natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Liver Dis. 2004. August;8(3):521–533, viii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Michelotti GA, Machado MV, Diehl AM. NAFLD, NASH and liver cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013. November;10(11):656–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ratziu V, Cadranel J-F, Serfaty L, Denis J, Renou C, Delassalle P, et al. A survey of patterns of practice and perception of NAFLD in a large sample of practicing gastroenterologists in France. J Hepatol. 2012. August;57(2):376–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Younossi ZM, Henry L. Economic and Quality-of-Life Implications of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. PharmacoEconomics. 2015. December;33(12):1245–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rinella ME. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015. June 9;313(22):2263–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ballestri S, Nascimbeni F, Romagnoli D, Baldelli E, Lonardo A. The Role of Nuclear Receptors in the Pathophysiology, Natural Course, and Drug Treatment of NAFLD in Humans. Adv Ther. 2016. March;33(3):291–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zelber-Sagi S, Lotan R, Shlomai A, Webb M, Harrari G, Buch A, et al. Predictors for incidence and remission of NAFLD in the general population during a seven-year prospective follow-up. J Hepatol. 2012. May;56(5):1145–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Teli MR, James OF, Burt AD, Bennett MK, Day CP. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver: a follow-up study. Hepatol Baltim Md. 1995. December;22(6):1714–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Adams LA, Ratziu V. Non-alcoholic fatty liver - perhaps not so benign. J Hepatol. 2015. May;62(5):1002–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wong VW-S, Wong GL-H, Choi PC-L, Chan AW-H, Li MK-P, Chan H-Y, et al. Disease progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective study with paired liver biopsies at 3 years. Gut. 2010. July;59(7):969–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.McPherson S, Hardy T, Henderson E, Burt AD, Day CP, Anstee QM. Evidence of NAFLD progression from steatosis to fibrosing-steatohepatitis using paired biopsies: implications for prognosis and clinical management. J Hepatol. 2015. May;62(5):1148–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pais R, Charlotte F, Fedchuk L, Bedossa P, Lebray P, Poynard T, et al. A systematic review of follow-up biopsies reveals disease progression in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver. J Hepatol. 2013. September;59(3):550–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Singh S, Allen AM, Wang Z, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Loomba R. Fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic fatty liver vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of paired-biopsy studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2015. April;13(4):643–654- 9–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ballestri S, Nascimbeni F, Romagnoli D, Lonardo A. The independent predictors of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and its individual histological features.: Insulin resistance, serum uric acid, metabolic syndrome, alanine aminotransferase and serum total cholesterol are a clue to pathogenesis and candidate targets for treatment. Hepatol Res Off J Jpn Soc Hepatol. 2016. October;46(11):1074–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dixon JB, Bhathal PS, O’Brien PE. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: predictors of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis in the severely obese. Gastroenterology. 2001. July;121(1):91–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Carulli L, Canedi I, Rondinella S, Lombardini S, Ganazzi D, Fargion S, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: interleukin-6–174G/C polymorphism is associated with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Dig Liver Dis Off J Ital Soc Gastroenterol Ital Assoc Study Liver. 2009. November;41(11):823–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Petta S, Cammà C, Cabibi D, Di Marco V, Craxì A. Hyperuricemia is associated with histological liver damage in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011. October;34(7):757–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Petta S, Grimaudo S, Cammà C, Cabibi D, Di Marco V, Licata G, et al. IL28B and PNPLA3 polymorphisms affect histological liver damage in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2012. June;56(6):1356–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Carulli L, Ballestri S, Lonardo A, Lami F, Violi E, Losi L, et al. Is nonalcoholic steatohepatitis associated with a high-though-normal thyroid stimulating hormone level and lower cholesterol levels? Intern Emerg Med. 2013. June;8(4):297–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Dasarathy J, Periyalwar P, Allampati S, Bhinder V, Hawkins C, Brandt P, et al. Hypovitaminosis D is associated with increased whole body fat mass and greater severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int Off J Int Assoc Study Liver. 2014. July;34(6):e118–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF), Lonardo A, Nascimbeni F, Targher G, Bernardi M, Bonino F, et al. AISF position paper on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): Updates and future directions. Dig Liver Dis Off J Ital Soc Gastroenterol Ital Assoc Study Liver. 2017. January 23; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Argo CK, Northup PG, Al-Osaimi AMS, Caldwell SH. Systematic review of risk factors for fibrosis progression in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol. 2009. August;51(2):371–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Angulo P, Kleiner DE, Dam-Larsen S, Adams LA, Bjornsson ES, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, et al. Liver Fibrosis, but No Other Histologic Features, Is Associated With Long-term Outcomes of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2015. August;149(2):389–397.e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Önnerhag K, Nilsson PM, Lindgren S. Increased risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer during long-term follow-up of patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014. September;49(9):1111–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Schwimmer JB, Behling C, Newbury R, Deutsch R, Nievergelt C, Schork NJ, et al. Histopathology of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2005. September;42(3):641–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Koehler EM, Plompen EPC, Schouten JNL, Hansen BE, Darwish Murad S, Taimr P, et al. Presence of diabetes mellitus and steatosis is associated with liver stiffness in a general population: The Rotterdam study. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2016. January;63(1):138–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.You SC, Kim KJ, Kim SU, Kim BK, Park JY, Kim DY, et al. Factors associated with significant liver fibrosis assessed using transient elastography in general population. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. January 28;21(4):1158–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Roulot D, Czernichow S, Le Clésiau H, Costes J-L, Vergnaud A-C, Beaugrand M. Liver stiffness values in apparently healthy subjects: influence of gender and metabolic syndrome. J Hepatol. 2008. April;48(4):606–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Powell EE, Cooksley WG, Hanson R, Searle J, Halliday JW, Powell LW. The natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a follow-up study of forty-two patients for up to 21 years. Hepatol Baltim Md. 1990. January;11(1):74–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Bhala N, Angulo P, van der Poorten D, Lee E, Hui JM, Saracco G, et al. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis: an international collaborative study. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2011. October;54(4):1208–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hui JM, Kench JG, Chitturi S, Sud A, Farrell GC, Byth K, et al. Long-term outcomes of cirrhosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis compared with hepatitis C. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2003. August;38(2):420–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bugianesi E, Leone N, Vanni E, Marchesini G, Brunello F, Carucci P, et al. Expanding the natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: from cryptogenic cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2002. July;123(1):134–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ong J, Younossi ZM, Reddy V, Price LL, Gramlich T, Mayes J, et al. Cryptogenic cirrhosis and posttransplantation nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Transplant Off Publ Am Assoc Study Liver Dis Int Liver Transplant Soc. 2001. September;7(9):797–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Singal AG, Manjunath H, Yopp AC, Beg MS, Marrero JA, Gopal P, et al. The effect of PNPLA3 on fibrosis progression and development of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014. March;109(3):325–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Younossi ZM, Otgonsuren M, Henry L, Venkatesan C, Mishra A, Erario M, et al. Association of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the United States from 2004 to 2009. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2015. December;62(6):1723–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Paradis V, Zalinski S, Chelbi E, Guedj N, Degos F, Vilgrain V, et al. Hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with metabolic syndrome often develop without significant liver fibrosis: a pathological analysis. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2009. March;49(3):851–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Piscaglia F, Svegliati-Baroni G, Barchetti A, Pecorelli A, Marinelli S, Tiribelli C, et al. Clinical patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A multicenter prospective study. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2016. March;63(3):827–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Giannini EG, Marabotto E, Savarino V, Trevisani F, di Nolfo MA, Del Poggio P, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2009. May;7(5):580–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kim WR, Poterucha JJ, Porayko MK, Dickson ER, Steers JL, Wiesner RH. Recurrence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis following liver transplantation. Transplantation. 1996. December 27;62(12):1802–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Malik SM, Devera ME, Fontes P, Shaikh O, Sasatomi E, Ahmad J. Recurrent disease following liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis. Liver Transplant Off Publ Am Assoc Study Liver Dis Int Liver Transplant Soc. 2009. December;15(12):1843–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Bhagat V, Mindikoglu AL, Nudo CG, Schiff ER, Tzakis A, Regev A. Outcomes of liver transplantation in patients with cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis versus patients with cirrhosis due to alcoholic liver disease. Liver Transplant Off Publ Am Assoc Study Liver Dis Int Liver Transplant Soc. 2009. December;15(12):1814–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]