Skip to main content
PMC home page
Pharmaceutical Biology logoLink to Pharmaceutical Biology
. 2017 Feb 6;55(1):991–997. doi: 10.1080/13880209.2017.1285324

Potential anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Sambucus australis

Jhéssica Benevides Bahiense a, Franciane Martins Marques a, Mariana Moreira Figueira a, Thais Souza Vargas a, Tamara P Kondratyuk b, Denise Coutinho Endringer a, Rodrigo Scherer a, Marcio Fronza a,✉
PMCID: PMC6130686  PMID: 28166708

Abstract

Context:Sambucus australis Cham. & Schltdl. (Adoxaceae) is used in Brazilian folk medicine to treat inflammatory disorders.

Objective: To evaluate the in vitro anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of S. australis.

Materials and methods: The anti-inflammatory activity of ethanol extracts of the leaf and bark of S. australis (1–100 μg/mL) were studied in lipopolysaccharide/interferon γ stimulated murine macrophages RAW 264.7 cells (24 h incubation) by investigating the release of nitric oxide (NO) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and in the TNF-α-induced nuclear factor kappa (NF-κB) assay. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by the microdilution test (24 h incubation). Antioxidant activity was determined by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and the NO scavenging assays. Chemical composition was assessed by LC-MS/MS.

Results: Antioxidant activities in the DPPH (IC50 43.5 and 66.2 μg/mL), FRAP (IC50 312.6 and 568.3 μg/mL) and NO radical scavenging assays (IC50 285.0 and 972.6 μg/mL) were observed in the leaf and bark ethanol extracts, respectively. Solely the leaf extract showed significant inhibition of NO and TNF-α production in RAW264.7 cells at concentrations of 2 and 100 μg/mL, respectively, and suppression of TNF-α inhibition of NF-κB by 12.8 and 20.4% at concentrations of 50 and 100 μg/mL, respectively. The extract also exhibited antibacterial activity against Salmonella typhimurium (MIC 250 μg/mL) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (MIC 250 μg/mL). LC-MS/MS revealed the presence of chlorogenic acid and rutin as major compounds.

Discussion and conclusion: The results indicate that the ethanol leaf extract of S. australis exhibit prominent anti-inflammatory effects.

Keywords: Natural products, phenolic compounds, nitric oxide, cytokines, nuclear factor-κB, macrophages

Introduction

Inflammation is the immune system’s response to ward off injurious stimuli such as pathogens, damaged tissues or irritants. Both acute and chronic inflammation play essential roles in the restoration of homeostasis (Sacca et al. 1997; Serhan et al. 2007; Ricciotti & FitzGerald 2011). In inflammatory processes, activated macrophages secrete excessive nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukins (ILs). Pro-inflammatory mediators, particularly the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) for nitric oxide production, and cyclooxygenase (COX-2) for prostaglandin production, have demonstrated promotion/progression of various human inflammatory diseases (Zamora et al. 2000; Wright et al. 2010).

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most important group of available medicines used for the management of pain, and exhibit various anti-inflammatory, antipyretic and analgesic activities. However, the majority of NSAIDs also exhibit serious adverse effects, particularly gastrointestinal complications (Lichtenstein et al. 1995; Mckellar et al. 2007). Thus, the development of new drugs for the treatment of chronic inflammation and pain continues to be an issue of high interest, prompting a continuous search worldwide, for new compounds with anti-inflammatory properties and fewer side effects. Due to the properties claimed, and the needs of the pharmaceutical market, anti-inflammatory agents originating from natural products used in traditional medicine are a major focus of interest of the pharmaceutical industry (Akkol 2012; Russo et al. 2015).

Sambucus australis Cham. & Schltdl. (Adoxaceae), a shrub that is widespread in South America, is commonly known as sabugueiro in Brazil. Its aerial parts have been used in folk medicine to treat respiratory and inflammatory diseases, as a mild laxative, for diuretic and antipyretic purposes, in infusions and decoctions, and as a poultice (Brandão et al. 2006; Nunes et al. 2007; Nascimento et al. 2014). The main reported secondary metabolites for this species are flavonoids (kaempferol and quercetin), quercetin glycosides (rutin, hyperoside, isoquercetrin), triterpenes (ursolic acid), volatile oils, and phenolic acids (Lorenzi & Matos 1985; Scopel et al. 2010; Rao et al. 2011).

The biological activities of S. australis are practically unknown even through studies on other species of the Sambucus genus have been published. The potential anti-inflammatory activity of Sambucus genus was reported by Schwaiger et al. (2011), demonstrating that the leaf extract of Sambucus ebulus L. and its major isolated compound, ursolic acid, inhibited TNF-α production in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and induced the expression of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1. Methanolic extract of S. ebulus was reported to exhibit antibacterial activity against methicillin resistant S. aureus (Salehzadeh et al. 2014) and displayed remarkable wound-healing activity (Süntar et al. 2010). Potential anti-inflammatory activities were also reported using an aqueous extract from the flower of Sambucus nigra L. (Harokopakis et al. 2006). The authors showed that the flower extract inhibits macrophage release of proinflammatory cytokines and suppresses the activation of neutrophils. These effects could be attributed to suppression of nuclear transcription factor κB activation and inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (Harokopakis et al. 2006).

Based on these promising biological activities described in other species of Sambucus genus, and the lack of biological studies with S. australis naturally found in Brazil, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antibacterial activities of S. australis.

Materials and methods

Reagents

Interferon gamma (IFN-γ), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), penicillin, streptomycin, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hidrazyl (DPPH), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC), nitroprusside, TPTZ (2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine), chlorogenic acid, gallic acid, quercetin, rutin and Folin-Ciocalteau reagent were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Reporter lysis buffer and the luciferase assay system were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). TNF-α ELISA kit was purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA). All other solvents and reagents were of analytical grade, and were purchased from Vetec and Dinamic (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).

Cell lines

Swiss 3T3 albino mouse fibroblasts (American Type Culture Collection – ATCC® CCL-92TM), murine hepatoma (Hepa 1c1c7) cells (ATTC® CRL-2026TM), mouse macrophages RAW 264.7 (ATCC® TIB-71™) (Cell Line Service, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), human embryonic kidney cells 293 (Panomic, Fremont, CA) were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 IU/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin, at 37 °C, in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 (all Sigma).

Plant material

Leaves and bark of Sambucus australis were collected in Tucunduva city, South Brazil, in March 2014 (Latitude −27.634394 and Longitude −54.408549). The plant was taxonomically identified by botanist Ms. Solange Zanotti Schneider, and a voucher specimen was deposited in the herbarium of the University Vila Velha/UVV (UVVES-2397).

Preparation of plant extracts

The air-dried, ground leaves and bark (100 g) were first defatted with hexane (1 L) and then exhaustively extracted with ethanol (1 L) using a Soxhlet apparatus. Subsequently, the solvent was removed under vacuum at 40 °C (Fisaton 801, São Paulo, Brazil) and the ethanol leaf and bark extract (12.7 and 3.5 g, respectively) were obtained. The extracts were stored at −20 °C until use.

Determination of total phenolics

Total phenolic contents (TPC) in the extracts were estimated by the spectrophotometric Folin–Ciocalteu method, according to the Scherer and Godoy (2009) method. All analyses were performed in triplicate and the results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The TPC is expressed as milligrams of pyrogallol equivalents per gram of crude extract.

Determination of tannin contents

Tannin content in the extract was estimated using the insoluble polyvinyl polypirrolidone (PVPP) method, as previously described (Singh et al. 2012). The plant extract solution was prepared at 1% in methanol, and then aliquots of 1 mL were mixed with 100 mg PVPP, vortexed, kept for 10 min at 4 °C, and centrifuged for 10 min at 800g. The non-tannin phenolic content was determined in the clear supernatant in a similar manner to the total phenolic content (Scherer & Godoy 2009). The tannin content was estimated as the difference between total phenolic and non-tannin phenolic content in the extract. All analyses were performed in triplicate and the results are expressed in milligram of pyrogallol equivalents per gram of crude extract.

LC-ESI-MS/MS analyses

The identification of major chemical constituents in the ethanol leaf extract of S. australis was based on Zhu et al. (2012), with modifications. The chromatographic analyses were performed in a liquid chromatograph (Agilent 1200 series, Santa Clara, CA) coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometer detector (Applied Biosystems API 3200, Foster City, CA) with electrospray ionization (LC-ESI-MS/MS). The data were processed using the Analyst™ Software (version 5.0, Foster City, CA). All separations were performed on a Water Cortecs C18 column (Milford, MA), (150 mm ×4.6 mm, 2.7 μm) at 25 °C. The mobile phase consisted of an aqueous solution with formic acid (1% v/v) (A) and methanol with formic acid (1% v/v) (B) using a gradient elution at 0.6 mL/min of 10–50% B in 0–8 min, 50–70% B in 8–12 min, 70–10% B in 12–15 min, and conditioning time of 5 min. The samples were diluted with methanol at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. The compounds were identified by comparing the similarity of the mass spectra and retention time with the standard solutions and with the literature. The following standard compounds were evaluated: gallic acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, rosmarinic acid, chlorogenic acid, apigenin, rutin and quercetin.

DPPH radical scavenging assay

The DPPH scavenging activity of the leaf and bark extracts was evaluated by bleaching of the purple methanol solution of free radical DPPH according to Scherer and Godoy (2009). Antioxidant activity was expressed as IC50 value (μg/mL) and by the antioxidant activity index (AAI). The assays were carried out in triplicate and antioxidant activity was compared with the commonly used chlorogenic acid and tocopherol (vitamin E).

Ferric reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP)

Antioxidant capability of S. australis extract was estimated as described by Pulido et al. (2000) with modifications. FRAP reagent (270 μL), freshly prepared, was mixed with 30 μL of test sample or ethanol (for the reagent blank). The test samples and reagent blank were incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The FRAP reagent contained 2.5 mL of 2,4,6-tripyridyl-2-triazine (TPTZ) solution in 40 mM HCl plus 2.5 mL of 20 mM FeCl3·6H2O and 25 mL of 0.3 M acetate buffer (pH 3.6). At the end of incubation, the absorbance was measured at 595 nm using a microplate reader (Molecular Devises, Spectra Max 190, Sunnyvale, CA). Ethanolic solutions of known Fe II concentration were used for the preparation of the calibration curve. The FRAP value was expressed as mmol Fe (II) equivalent/mg extract. The experiments were carried out at least in triplicate.

Nitric oxide radical scavenging assay

Nitric oxide radical (NO−) generated from sodium nitroprusside (SNP) was measured using the Griess reaction. Briefly, the reaction mixture containing sodium nitroprusside (10 mM) in phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.3) with or without the plant extract at different concentrations (62.5–1000.0 μg/mL) was incubated at room temperature for 30 min in a 96 wells plate. Next, 150 μL of incubated solution was mixed with 150 μL of Griess reagent (1% sulfanilamide in 5% H3PO4 and 0.1% N-(1-naphthyl) ethylenediamine in distilled water in equal volumes) and the absorbance of chromophore formed during the diazotization of nitrite ions with sulfanilamide and subsequent coupling with naphthylethylene-diaminedihydrochloride was measured at 540 nm in an ELISA plate reader (Molecular Devices Spectra MAX 190 Orleans Drive Sunnyvale, CA). Gallic acid was used as positive control. The quantification of nitrite was calculated by regression analysis from a standard curve of sodium nitrite and the percentage of the NO inhibition was calculated by using the nitrite level of SNP-induced group as control.

Measurement of cell viability

Cell viability studies were performed using the MTT assay. Macrophages RAW 264.7, 3T3 fibroblasts and Hepa 1c1c7 cells were plated at a density of 7 × 105 cells/mL in 96-well flat-bottomed tissue culture plates. After overnight incubation, the cells were incubated for additional 24 h in the presence or absence of increasing concentrations (10.0–500.0 μg/mL) of the ethanol leaf and barks extracts. Camptothecin was used as the positive control. After incubation, 100 μL of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) (1 mg/mL) was added per well, and the plate was incubated for 2 h. The formazan crystals formed by cellular mitochondrial dehydrogenases were then dissolved with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) cells. The optical density of purple formazan, proportional to the number of viable cells, was measured at 595 nm using a microplate spectrophotometer (SpectraMax 190; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Experiments were carried out at least in triplicate.

Nitric oxide analysis in the supernatant of macrophage cell culture

RAW 264.7 cells were plated at 5.0 × 105 cells/mL in 24-well tissue culture plates and incubated with or without ethanol leaf and bark extracts of S. australis (2.0–50.0 μg/mL) for 2 h. Next, cells were stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL)/IFN-γ (10 ng/mL) and incubated for additional 24 h. Nitrite accumulation in the culture medium as an indicator of NO production was measured using the Griess reagent (1% sulfanilamide in 5% H3PO4 and 0.1% N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine in distilled water) (Green et al. 1982). The culture supernatant (100 mL) was mixed with 100 mL of Griess reagent and incubated for 10 min. The absorbance at 540 nm was measured in an ELISA plate reader (SpectraMax 190; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) and the inhibitory rates were calculated by using a standard calibration curve prepared with sodium nitrite, by comparing with the LPS/IFN-γ stimulated control group.

Measurement of TNF-α

Macrophage RAW 264.7 cells were exposed to LPS (1 μg/mL)/IFN-γ (10 ng/mL) with or without ethanol leaf and bark extracts of S. australis (10.0–100.0 μg/mL) for 24 h. Next, 100 μL of the culture supernatant was used to determine the level of TNF-α by EIA assay kit technique using specific antibodies and cytokine standards according to the manufacturer’s instructions (eBioscience, San Diego, CA).

Nuclear factor-κB luciferase assay

Human embryonic kidney cells 293 (Panomic, Fremont, CA) were used for monitoring changes occurring along the NF-κB pathway (Kondratyuk et al. 2012). Stable constructed cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 20 × 103 cells/well. Cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Invitrogen Co.; Carlsbad, CA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 units/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 2 mM l-glutamine. After 48 h of incubation, the medium was replaced and the cells were treated with various concentrations of test compounds. TNF-α (Human Recombinant, E. coli, Calbiochem, Gibbstown, NJ) was used as an activator at a concentration of 2 ng/mL (0.14 nM). The plate was incubated for 6 h. Spent medium was discarded and the cells were washed once with PBS. Cells were lysed using 50 μL (for 96-well plate) of Reporter Lysis Buffer from Promega, by incubating for 5 min on a shaker, and stored at −80 °C. The luciferase assay was performed using the Luc assay system from Promega (Madison, WI). The gene product, luciferase enzyme, reacts with luciferase substrate, emitting light which was detected using a luminometer (Multi-Mode Microplate Reader, Filter Max F5, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Data for NF-κB constructs were expressed as IC50 values (i.e. the concentration required to inhibit TNF-activated NF-κB activity by 50%). As a positive control, two known NF-κB inhibitors were used: TPCK, IC50 3.8 μM and BAY-11, IC50 2.0 μM.

Antibacterial activity

The antibacterial properties of the extracts were evaluated using the standard NCCL method broth dilution method (NCCL, 2008), in a 96-well microtiter plate. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined against the Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Streptococcus agalactiae (ATCC 12386), and the Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739), Salmonella typhimurium (ATCC 14028) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (CCCD K003), and yeast represented by Candida albicans (ATCC 10231). The final concentration of cells was adjusted in a turbidimeter (930 NTU – Nephelometric Turbidity Units) 0.5 on the McFarland scale, in the order of 106 CFU/ml. 100 μL of culture medium (Mueller–Hinton broth 2.1%), sample or antibiotic, and the inoculum were added to each well. The final tested concentrations of the extracts were 1000.0, 500.0, 250.0, 125.0 and 62.5 μg/mL. After the addition of inoculum, the plates were incubated for 24 h. Later on, 100 μL of triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) (0.5% aqueous solution) was added. After 4 h incubation, the MIC was determined as the lowest concentration capable of inhibiting visible growth of cells, checked by TTC. In all plates, positive and negative controls (six wells of each) were included. The experiments were carried out at least in triplicate.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the software GraphPad Prism 5 (San Diego, CA). The results are expressed as the mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) or standard deviation (SD) of triplicate experiments. Statistically significant values were compared using a using one- or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with the Tukey test for post hoc comparisons. Values of p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Determination of total phenolic (TPC) and tannin content in the leaf and bark extracts of S. australis revealed that the medicinal plant is rich in phenolic compounds (Table 1). TPC were expressed as milligram equivalents of pyrogallol per gram of crude extract. Higher amounts of TPC was detected in the leaves compared to the bark (395.24 ± 3.97 and 381.35 ± 1.98 mg/g of pyrogallol, respectively), although the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). Tannin content in the extracts ranged from 47.62 ± 1.75 to 77.38 ± 1.98 mg/g of dry extract in the leaf and bark extracts, respectively, with significant differences (p < 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Quantification of total phenolics and tannins content present in the ethanol leaf and bark extracts of S. australis.

Plant material Total phenolic*(mg/g) Tannins*(mg/g)
Ethanol leaf extract 395.24 ± 3.97a 77.38 ± 1.98a
Ethanol bark extract 381.35 ± 1.98a 47.62 ± 1.75b
Open in a new tab

Different letters in the same column correspond to significant differences (p < 0.05). Tests was performed in triplicate and expressed as mean ± standard error.

*

Results expressed in mg of pyrogallol equivalents per gram of crude extract.

The major constituents in the ethanol leaf extract were identified using LC-MS/MS analyses. Figure 1 shows a representative chromatogram of the ethanol leaf extract of S. australis, exhibiting the presence of phenolic compounds caffeic acid and chlorogenic acid and the flavonoids rutin and quercetin as major compounds.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Representative chromatogram of the ethanol leaf extract of S. australis (under conditions described in LC-ESI-MS/MS analyses).

Natural bioactive compounds such as phenols are described as important secondary metabolites with intrinsic properties that affect oxidative stability and present many biological properties, including antioxidant activity (Singh et al. 2012). DPPH scavenging activity was expressed as IC50 in μg/mL and by Antioxidant Activity Index (AAI) proposed by Scherer and Godoy (2009), which classifies the antioxidants as weak when AAI <0.5, moderate when AAI is between 0.05 and 1.0, strong when AAI is between 1.0 and 2.0, and very strong when AAI >2.0. The ethanol leaf and bark extract exhibited moderate activity, with AAI of 0.8 ± 0.03 and 0.5 ± 0.03, respectively. Tocopherol presents very strong activity (AAI of 3.2 ± 1.10) (Table 2). The ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) is a simple and rapid method, and is based on the reduction of the Fe3+ complex of tripyridyltriazine (Fe(TPTZ)3+) to the intensely blue-coloured Fe2+ complex (Fe(TPTZ)2+) by antioxidants (Russo et al. 2015). The ethanol leaf and bark extracts showed a weak ferric reducing antioxidant power, with an IC50 of 312.6 ± 2.61 μg/mL and 568.3 ± 4.72 μg/mL, respectively. Quercetin (used as standard) exhibited an IC50 of 15.7 ± 0.32 μg/mL (Table 2). Sodium nitroprusside spontaneously generates NO as free radical in aqueous solution at physiological pH (7.2) which interacts with oxygen to produce nitrite ions that can be estimated by the Griess reaction. The scavenging effects of ethanol leaf and bark extracts of S. australis on NO production was estimated using sodium nitroprusside, which spontaneously generates NO as free radical in aqueous solution at physiological pH (Boora et al. 2014). The results expressed as IC50 are shown in Table 2. The ethanol leaf extract (IC50 of 285.0 ± 9.61 μg/mL) exhibited interesting NO scavenging activity, comparable with the triphenolic compound gallic acid used as reference (IC50 value of 223.2 mg/mL ±4.36 μg/mL). The bark extract exhibited only week scavenging activity, with an IC50 value of 972.6 ± 12.15 μg/mL.

Table 2.

In vitro antioxidant activity of ethanol leaf and bark extract of S. australis determined by DPPH radical scavenging activity, ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and nitric oxide radical scavenging assay.

  DPPH scavenging activity
 FRAP NO radical Scavenging activity
Sample IC50 (μg/mL) AAI IC50 (μg/mL) IC50 (μg/mL)
ELE 43.5 ± 1.55a 0.8 ± 0.03a 312.6 ± 2.61a 285.0 ± 9.61a
EBE 66.2 ± 0.78a 0.5 ± 0.03a 568.3 ± 4.72b 972.6 ± 12.15b
Tocopherol 11.8 ± 6.30b 3.2 ± 1.10b – –
Quercetin – – 15.7 ± 0.32c –
Gallic acid – – – 223.2 ± 4.36a
Open in a new tab

ELE: ethanol leaf extract; EBE: ethanol bark extract. Different letters in the same column correspond to significant differences (p < 0.05). Tests (n = 3) were performed in triplicate and expressed as mean ± standard error.

The cytotoxic activities of extracts was tested in vitro against one normal cell line (mouse fibroblasts) and two cancer cell lines: the human ovarian carcinoma cell line (OVCAR-3) and murine (Hepa 1c1c7) hepatoma cells. No cytotoxic effects were observed for the leaf and bark extracts at concentrations ranging from 1.0 to 100.0 μg/mL (data not shown) in all tested cell lines.

The antimicrobial activity of S. australis leaf and bark ethanol extract was tested against five different bacterial strains and the fungus C. albicans, and indicated variable activities against all the organisms tested as shown in Table 3. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) evidenced that the ethanol leaf and bark extracts of S. australis exhibited promising antibacterial activity against Salmonella and Klebsiella with an MIC value of 250 μg/mL. The ethanol leaf extract also shows weak activity against the Gram positive bacteria S. aureus (MIC 1000 μg/mL) and the fungus C. albicans (MIC 500 μg/mL).

Table 3.

Antimicrobial activity of the ethanol leaf and bark extracts of S. australis expressed as Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) in μg/mL.

  MIC (μg/mL)
  Ethanol leaf extract Ethanol bark extract Penicillin Norfloxacin
S. aureus 1000 >1000 – 500
S. agalactiae >1000 >1000 100 –
C. albicans 500 1000 – 30
E. coli >1000 >1000 100 250
S. typhimurium 250 250 100 –
K. pneumoniae 250 250 100 –
Open in a new tab

Concerning the cytokines production, the effects of ethanol leaf and bark extracts of S. australis on LPS/IFN-γ induced inflammation in RAW 264.7 macrophage were evaluated by measuring the production of NO and pro-inflammatory cytokines. As observed in Figure 2, stimulation with LPS/IFN-γ for 24 h significantly induced the release of NO and TNF-α indicating that an inflammatory response was induced in the RAW 264.7 cells. As shown in Figure 2(A), when RAW 264.7 cells were treated with the ethanol leaf extract of S. australis at 100 μg/mL, a significant inhibition of TNF-α production was observed (p < 0.05). Ethanol bark extract did not reduce TNF-α production in RAW 264.7 cells. As shown in Figure 2(B), both extracts caused a significant decreased in NO release compared to the LPS/IFN-γ control group (p < 0.05). The leaf extract exhibited higher inhibition effect in all tested concentrations, reaching 70% at a concentration of 50.0 μg/mL.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

S. australis reduce nitric oxide (NO) and TNF-α concentration in vitro. RAW 264.7 macrophage were exposed with or without ethanol leaf and barks extracts of S. australis for 2 h and then stimulated with LPS/IFN-γ. (A) TNF-α and (B) NO production was measured 24 h later using ELISA Kit and the Griess reagent, respectively, as described in the “Materials and methods” section. Results are expressed as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *Significant at p < 0.05 compared to control LPS/IFN-γ-induced cells.

The inhibitory effects of the ethanol leaf extract of S. australis on TNF-α and NO production prompted us to further investigate its ability to influence the nuclear factor (NF)-κB signalling pathway. The suppression of NF-κB activation by the ethanol leaf extract of S. australis was 12.8 ± 2.6% and 20.4 ± 3.5% at concentrations of 50 and 100 μg/mL, respectively.

Discussion

Different plant extracts and single compounds isolated from the Sambucus genus were reported to have relevant pharmacological activities, such as anti-inflammatory (Schwaiger et al. 2011), antibacterial (Salehzadeh et al. 2014) and wound healing activity (Süntar et al. 2010). However, despite being widely used in folk medicine, the biological activities of the species S. australis has not been investigated (Lorenzi & Matos 1985; Brandão et al. 2006; Nunes et al. 2007). In this study, for the first time, the authors show that the ethanol leaf extract of S. australis was able to exert anti-inflammatory effects in LPS/IFN-γ activated RAW 264.7 macrophage which may be related, at least in part, to the inhibitory activity of the pro-inflammatory mediators, NO and TNF production and suppression of NF-κB activation.

Inflammation is one of the most important biological protective responses to tissue injury or microbial invasion, and is capable of causing cell injury, under which pro-inflammatory mediators are released (Sacca et al. 1997; Serhan et al. 2007). Inflammatory factors are considered fundamental elements in the chronic inflammation associated with many diseases, such as atherosclerosis, obesity, diabetes, neurodegenerative diseases and cancer. Steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are currently used to treat acute inflammation. However, these drugs are not entirely successful in curing chronic inflammatory disorders, and often have side effects (Lichtenstein et al. 1995; Mckellar et al. 2007). Therefore, the identification of new, safer and more effective anti-inflammatory compounds is necessary (Cragg & Newman 2013; Russo et al. 2015). Currently, great attention has been devoted to the use of natural compounds, especially phenolic compounds, which are well-known phytochemicals found in all plants and have notable pharmacological properties, including antioxidant activity (Singh et al. 2012; Barbaro et al. 2014; Kim et al. 2014). In the present study, especially, leaf extract of S. australis exhibited an expressive amount of phenolic compounds, with caffeic acid and chlorogenic acid being the major compounds, and a moderate concentration of total tannins. The antioxidant activity estimated using different in vitro antioxidant tests exhibited by the leaf extract could be associated with the significant phenolic content, suggesting a correlation between these constituents and antioxidant activity. These results are in agreement with the current literature, which emphasizes the relationship between antioxidant activity and the presence of phenolic compounds, showing that they are responsible for quenching different free radicals (Al-Zoreky 2009; Hossain et al. 2011; Saeed et al. 2012; Xu et al. 2015).

Nitric oxide (NO) is a free radical with important complex regulatory activity on the functions, growth and death of many cell types involved in immune and inflammatory responses (Sharma et al. 2016). NO is produced through the action of iNOS, and is present at low levels under normal physiological conditions; however, it is rapidly induced by pro-inflammatory and mitogenic stimuli, including LPS (Coleman 2001). Many studies have demonstrated that excessive NO production plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of inflammation, and can lead to tissue damage by reacting with reactive oxygen species (Martinon 2010; Harijith et al. 2014). On the other hand, inhibitors of NO induction have been reported to exert anti-inflammatory effects by preventing iNOS expression (Achoui et al. 2010, Pinho et al. 2011; Rebelo et al. 2014). In the present study, the obtained in vitro results showed that S. australis significantly reduced NO production in LPS/IFN-γ stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages, and possesses good NO radical scavenging activity leading to the reduction of the nitrite concentration generated from sodium nitroprusside. This suggests that inhibition of NO contributes to the anti-inflammatory activity of S. australis, without affecting the viability of these cells.

Inflammatory disorders are also characterized, among other events, by the production and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-α (Carballo et al. 1998). TNF-α is considered a critical cytokine in the inflammatory cytokine network, and is important for promoting the expression of iNOS and production of other cytokines. Therefore, suppressing the overproduction and activity of pro-inflammatory cytokines is necessary to reduce inflammation and its symptoms, and this method has proved to be successful in the treatment of certain inflammatory diseases (Fullerton & Gilroy 2016; Lai & Dong 2016). In these study, it was demonstrated that LPS/IFN-γ-induced production of TNF-α was significant affected by the ethanol leaf extract of S. australis, suggesting the potential anti-inflammatory activity of the extract. Corroborating with our results, the current literature has described the potential anti-inflammatory activity of Sambucus genus by inhibiting macrophage release of pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α (Harokopakis et al. 2006; Schwaiger et al. 2011).

Of the several transcriptional factors activated by inflammatory responses, NF-κB is known to induce the transcription of pro-inflammatory mediators, such as inducible NO synthase (iNOS), cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6 (Surh et al. 2001). Thus, we considered that the NF-κB signalling pathway might be involved in the ethanol leaf extract mediated down-regulations of NO and TNF-α. Therefore, we investigated the effects of ethanol leaf extract of S. australis on the NF-κB signalling pathway and demonstrated that the molecular mechanism by which the ethanol leaf extract of S. australis inhibits the expression of these inflammatory mediators appeared to be only partially involved the inhibition of NF-κB activation. The search for new chemotherapeutic alternatives from traditional medicine led to great success in eliminating infections caused by drug-resistant microbes, and reducing harm caused by antibiotics (Sharma et al. 2016). MIC values obtained from leaf and bark extracts exhibited prominent antibacterial activity against Gram negative bacteria, especially Salmonella typhimurium and Klebsiella pneumoniae. According to Alberto et al. (2001), phenolic compounds may affect the growth and metabolism of bacteria. They may have distinct effects by activating or inhibiting microbial growth according to their constitution and concentration. Thus, the antibacterial activity exhibited by S. australis extracts could be associated to the significant phenolic content present in the leaves and bark. Corroborating with our results, previous studies have found that S. ebulus extracts were active against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Ghesmati 2008); S. nigra flower exhibited strong antimicrobial effects on various nosocomial pathogens, notably methicillin-resistant S. aureus (Hearst et al. 2010).

Conclusions

The present investigation suggests that S. australis extracts have the ability to inhibit the production of pro-inflammatory mediators such as NO and TNF-α in LPS/IFN-γ stimulated macrophages, an action that is only partially dependent on NF-κB signalling pathway; they possess free radical scavenging activity, and provide protection against microbial infections. These biological properties may be attributed to the potential of different constituents, especially polyphenols. In conclusion, these preliminary in vitro results are encouraging for further biological and phytochemical studies aimed at isolating and identifying the active principles, which could provide scientific evidence for the popular use of S. australis and contribute to the development of new therapeutic strategies against inflammatory disorders.

Funding Statement

The authors are grateful to the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo (FAPES, grant no. 66606497/2014 and TO 241/2016), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico [CNPq grants n° 401409/2014-7 and n° 443018/2014-6] for the financial support.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo (FAPES, grant no. 66606497/2014 and TO 241/2016), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq grants n° 401409/2014-7 and n° 443018/2014-6) for the financial support.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no declarations of interest.

References

  1. Achoui M, Appleton D, Abdulla MA, Awang K, Mohd MA, Mustafa MR.. 2010. In vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory activity of 17-O-acetylacuminolide through the inhibition of cytokines, NF-κB translocation and IKKβ activity. PLoS One. 5:e15105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akkol EK.2012. New strategies for anti-inflammatory drug development. J Pharmacogenomics Pharmacoproteomics. 3:e118. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alberto MR, Farías ME, Manca De Nadra MC.. 2001. Effect of gallic acid and catechin on Lactobacillus hilgardii 5w growth and metabolism of organic compounds. J Agric Food Chem. 9:4359–4363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Al-Zoreky NS.2009. Antimicrobial activity of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit peels. Int J Food Microbiol. 134:244–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barbaro B, Toietta G, Maggio R, Arciello M, Tarocchi M, Galli A, Balsano C.. 2014. Effects of the olive-derived polyphenol oleuropein on human health. Int J Mol Sci. 10:18508–18524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boora F, Chirisa E, Mukanganyama S.. 2014. Evaluation of nitrite radical scavenging properties of selected Zimbabwean plant extracts and their phytoconstituents. J Food Process. 2014:ID 910018 DOI: 10.1155/2014/918018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brandão MGL, Cosenza GP, Moreira RA, Monte-Mor RLM.. 2006. Medicinal plants and other botanical products from the Brazilian Official Pharmacopoeia. Braz J Pharmacog. 16:408–420. [Google Scholar]
  8. Carballo E, Lai WS, Blackshear PJ.. 1998. Feedback inhibition of macrophage tumor necrosis factor-alpha production by tristetraprolin. Science. 281:1001–1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coleman JW.2001. Nitric oxide in immunity and inflammation. Int Immunopharmacol. 1:1397–1406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cragg GM, Newman DJ.. 2013. Natural products: a continuing source of novel drug leads. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1830:3670–3695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fullerton JN, Gilroy DW.. 2016. Resolution of inflammation: a new therapeutic frontier. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 15:551–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ghesmati M.2008. Survey of antibacterial activity of Sambucus ebulus extracts against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 1341 and Psudomonase aeruginosa ATCC 2785. J Bio Sci. 1:73–82. [Google Scholar]
  13. Green LC, Wagner DA, Glogowski J, Skipper PL, Wishnok JS, Tannenbaum SR.. 1982. Analysis of nitrate, nitrite, and [15N]nitrate in biological fluids . Anal Biochem.126:131–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Harijith A, Ebenezer DL, Natarajan V.. 2014. Reactive oxygen species at the crossroads of inflammasome and inflammation. Front Physiol. 5:352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harokopakis E, Albzreh MH, Haase EM, Scannapieco FA, Hajishengallis G.. 2006. Inhibition of proinflammatory activities of major periodontal pathogens by aqueous extracts from elder flower (Sambucus nigra). J Periodontol. 77:271–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hearst C, McCollum G, Nelson D.. 2010. Antibacterial activity of elder (Sambucus nigra L.) flower or berry against hospital pathogens. J Med Plants Res. 4:1805–1809. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hossain MA, Shah MD, Gnanaraj C, Iqbal M.. 2011. In vitro total phenolics, flavonoids contents and antioxidant activity of essential oil, various organic extracts from the leaves of tropical medicinal plant Tetrastigma from Sabah. Asian Pac J Trop. 4:717–721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim HS, Quon MJ, Kim JA.. 2014. New insights into the mechanisms of polyphenols beyond antioxidant properties; lessons from the green tea polyphenol, epigallocatechin 3-gallate. Redox Biol. 10:187–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kondratyuk TP, Park EJ, Yu R, van Breemen RB, Asolkar RN, Murphy BT, Fenical W, Pezzuto JM.. 2012. Novel marine phenazines as potential cancer chemopreventive and anti-inflammatory agents. Mar Drugs. 10:451–464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lai Y, Dong C.. 2016. Therapeutic antibodies that target inflammatory cytokines in autoimmune diseases. Int Immunol. 28:181–188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lichtenstein DR, Syngal S, Wolfe MM.. 1995. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and the gastrointestinal tract. The double-edged sword. Arthritis Rheum. 38:5–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lorenzi H, Matos FJA.. 1985. Plantas medicinais no Brasil nativas e exóticas. São Paulo, Brasil: Instituto Plantarum. [Google Scholar]
  23. Martinon F.2010. Signaling by ROS drives inflammasome activation. Eur J Immunol. 40:616–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. McKellar G, Madhok R, Singh G.. 2007. The problem with NSAIDs: what data to believe? Curr Pain Headache Rep. 11:423–427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nascimento PG, Lemos TL, Bizerra AM, Arriaga ÂM, Ferreira DA, Santiago GM, Braz-Filho R, Costa JG.. 2014. Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of ursolic acid and derivatives. Molecules. 19:1317–1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nunes E, Scopel M, Vignoli-Silva M, Vendruscolo GS, Henriques AT, Mentz LA.. 2007. Caracterização farmacobotânica das espécies de Sambucus (Caprifoliaceae) utilizadas como medicinais no Brasil. Parte II. Braz J Pharmacog. 17:414–425. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pinho BR, Sousa C, Valentão P, Andrade PB.. 2011. Is nitric oxide decrease observed with naphthoquinones in LPS stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages a beneficial property? PLoS One. 6:e24098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pulido R, Bravo L, Saura-Calixto F.. 2000. Antioxidant activity of dietary polyphenols as determined by a modified ferric reducing/antioxidant power assay. J Agric Food Chem. 48:3396–3402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rao VS, de Melo CL, Queiroz MG, Lemos TL, Menezes DB, Melo TS, Santos FA.. 2011. Ursolic acid, a pentacyclic triterpene from Sambucus australis, prevents abdominal adiposity in mice fed a high-fat diet. J Med Food. 14:1375–1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rebelo MJ, Sousa C, Valentão P, Rego R, Andrade PB.. 2014. Phenolic profile of Douro wines and evaluation of their NO scavenging capacity in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Food Chem. 163:16–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ricciotti E, FitzGerald GA.. 2011. Prostaglandins and inflammation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 31:986–1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Russo D, Valentão P, Andrade PB, Fernandez EC, Milella L.. 2015. Evaluation of antioxidant, antidiabetic and anticholinesterase activities of Smallanthus sonchifolius landraces and correlation with their phytochemical profiles. Int J Mol Sci. 16:17696–17718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sacca R, Cuff CA, Ruddle NH.. 1997. Mediators of inflammation. Curr Opin Immunol. 9:851–857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Saeed N, Khan MR, Shabbir M.. 2012. Antioxidant activity, total phenolic and total flavonoid contents of whole plant extracts Torilis leptophylla L. BMC Complement Altern Med. 12:221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Salehzadeh A, Asadpour L, Naeemi AS, Houshmand E.. 2014. Antimicrobial activity of methanolic extracts of Sambucus ebulus and Urtica dioica against clinical isolates of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 11:38–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Scherer R, Godoy HL.. 2009. Antioxidant activity index (AAI) by the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl method. Food Chem. 112:654–658. [Google Scholar]
  37. Schwaiger S, Zeller I, Pölzelbauer P, Frotschnig S, Laufer G, Messner B, Pieri V, Stuppner H, Bernhard D.. 2011. Identification and pharmacological characterization of the anti-inflammatory principal of the leaves of dwarf elder (Sambucus ebulus L.). J Ethnopharmacol. 133:704–709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Scopel M, Mentz LA, Henriques AT.. 2010. Comparative analysis of Sambucus nigra and Sambucus australis flowers: development and validation of an HPLC method for raw material quantification and preliminary stability study. Planta Med. 76:1026–1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Serhan CN, Brain SD, Buckley CD, Gilroy DW, Haslett C, O'Neill LA, Perretti M, Rossi AG, Wallace JL.. 2007. Resolution of inflammation: state of the art, definitions and terms. FASEB J. 21:325–332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sharma A, Goyal R, Sharma L.. 2016. Potential biological efficacy of Pinus plant species against oxidative, inflammatory and microbial disorders. BMC Complement Altern Med. 16:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Singh R, Verma PK, Singh G.. 2012. Total phenolic, flavonoids and tannin contents in different extracts of Artemisia absinthium. J Intercult Ethnopharmacol. 1:101–104. [Google Scholar]
  42. Süntar IP, Akkol EK, Yalçin FN, Koca U, Keleş H, Yesilada E.. 2010. Wound healing potential of Sambucus ebulus L. leaves and isolation of an active component, quercetin 3-O-glucoside. J Ethnopharmacol. 129:106–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Surh YJ, Chun KS, Cha HH, Han SS, Keum YS, Park KK, Lee SS.. 2001. Molecular mechanisms underlying chemopreventive activities of anti-inflammatory phytochemicals: down-regulation of COX-2 and iNOS through suppression of NF-kappa B activation. Mutat Res. 481:243–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wright HL, Moots RJ, Bucknall RC, Edwards SW.. 2010. Neutrophil function in inflammation and inflammatory diseases. Rheumatology (Oxford). 49:1618–1631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Xu Y, Burton S, Kim C, Sismour E.. 2015. Phenolic compounds, antioxidant, and antibacterial properties of pomace extracts from four Virginia-grown grape varieties. Food Sci Nutr. 4:125–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zamora R, Vodovotz Y, Billiar TR.. 2000. Inducible nitric oxide synthase and inflammatory diseases. Mol Med. 6:347–373. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhu ZW, Li J, Gao XM, Amponsem E, Kang LY, Hu LM, Zhang BL, Chang YX.. 2012. Simultaneous determination of stilbenes, phenolic acids, flavonoids and anthraquinones in Radix polygoni multiflori by LC–MS/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 62:162–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Pharmaceutical Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES