Abstract
Viruses have long been implicated in the pathogenesis of autoimmunity, yet their contribution remains circumstantial partly due to the lack of well-documented information on infections prior to autoimmune disease onset. Here, we used the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) as a model to mechanistically dissect the impact of viral infection on lupus-like autoimmunity. Virus persistence strongly enhanced disease in mice with otherwise weak genetic predisposition but not in highly predisposed or non-autoimmune mice, indicating a synergistic interplay between genetic susceptibility and virus infection. Moreover, endosomal Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) were both strictly required for disease acceleration, even though LCMV also induces strong TLR-independent type I interferon (IFN-I) production via RNA helicases and MAVS in conventional DCs. These results suggest that LCMV enhances systemic autoimmunity primarily by providing stimulatory nucleic acids for endosomal TLR engagement, whereas overstimulation of the MAVS-dependent cytosolic pathway in the absence of endosomal TLR signaling is insufficient for disease induction.
Introduction
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by hyperactivation of T cells, B cells and DCs, production of autoantibodies to nucleic acid-associated and other self-molecules, and immune complex-mediated inflammatory damage in multiple organs [1]. Mechanistic assessments in both mouse models and humans have highlighted the critical role of innate immune pathways of nucleic acid sensing in lupus pathogenesis, including the engagement of endosomal Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in B cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), production of type I interferons (IFN-I), and expression of an IFN-I inducible gene signature often correlating with disease activity [2–6]. In addition, evidence for the contribution of cytosolic RNA and DNA sensing has been presented [7–14], although whether overactivation of this pathway is sufficient to drive disease in the absence of endosomal TLR signaling remains to be determined.
Epidemiological and family studies have unequivocally established a strong genetic basis for SLE susceptibility [15]. Nevertheless, genetic predisposition is often insufficient, as documented by the incomplete concordance for SLE (~20–50%) in monozygotic twins [16–18]. Differences between genetically identical individuals may be due to stochastic events (e.g., T and B cell repertoire composition and epigenetic effects) and/or environmental contributions. Indeed, multiple environmental factors have been associated with lupus and other autoimmune conditions, with infectious agents receiving prominent attention [19].
The strongest association between infection and SLE has been reported for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), a ubiquitous DNA virus that latently infects ~95% of the human population. EBV promotes B cell proliferation, and some of the encoded proteins, such as nuclear antigen 1 (EBVN-1), share sequence homology with SLE autoantigens and may induce via antigenic mimicry antibodies that crossreact with the ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) Ro, Sm B/B’ and Sm D1 [20]. Besides EBV, tentative associations with SLE have been reported for parvovirus B19 [21], cytomegalovirus [22], and polyomavirus [23].
These associations are suggestive and more studies are required to determine whether and how viral infections contribute to lupus pathogenesis. Early investigations found that chronic infection induced at birth with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), a non-cytolytic negative-strand RNA virus [24], significantly enhanced disease in lupus-prone NZB, NZW, and NZB/W mice [25]. The current understanding of how viruses are sensed and provoke innate immune responses prompted us to examine mechanistically the impact of LCMV infection on autoimmune disease onset and progression. For this purpose, we used mice with various grades of systemic autoimmunity and found that persistent LCMV infection aggravated disease in genetically predisposed but not normal background mice. Moreover, the observation that LCMV-associated RNA engages both MyD88-dependent TLR7 in endolysosomes and MAVS-dependent MDA5 or RIG-I in the cytosol provided an experimental system to assess the differential contribution of these two pathways to disease enhancement. We found that lupus-predisposed mice lacking either endosomal TLR function or pDCs were protected from lupus-like disease even when persistently infected with LCMV. Thus, pDCs and endosomal TLRs are essential components of the core mechanism underlying pathogenic systemic autoimmunity, and their absence cannot be overcome by sustained stimulation of alternative innate immune cells and signaling pathways.
Materials and methods
Viruses
LCMV ARM and Cl13 stocks were prepared by serial passage in BHK-21 cells as described [26]. Resequencing and analysis of a specific MnlI restriction site in the LCMV stocks [27] ensured the fidelity of the viruses used. Virus titers were determined by plaque assays on VeroE6 cells [28].
Mice
NZB, BXSB, C57BL/6 and C57BL/6.Mavs–/–mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) or The Scripps Research Institute Animal Facility. Generation of C57BL/6.3d (Unc93b13d/3d) mice [29], congenic NZB.Irf8−/−mice [30], and congenic NZB.3d mice [31] was described previously. The Irf8−/− NZB mice and corresponding wild-type (WT) controls used in this study were littermates generated by crossing heterozygous Irf8+/− mice. Homozygous Unc93b13d/3dMavs–/–(3d/Mavs) double-deficient C57BL/6 mice lacking both endosomal TLR and MAVS signaling were generated by crossing C57BL/6.3d and C57BL/6.Mavs–/–mice. Similar double-deficient mutants in mixed (NZB×C57BL/6) background were generated as (NZB.3d×C57BL/6.3d/Mavs)×C57BL/6.3d/Mavs backcrosses, followed by genotyping to select for 3d/Mavs homozygosity. Estimation of group sizes was based on previous experience with LCMV-infected and lupus-prone mice without a priori determination by power calculation. Individual mice were randomly assigned to experimental groups and analyzed under identical experimental conditions but without blinding except for GN score determinations. Neonatal infection with Cl13 or ARM was performed by injection of 103 plaque-forming units (PFU) per mouse. Efficiency of infection was verified by measuring serum virus titers by plaque assay in adult (2–3 mo old) individual mice, which showed titers ranging from 0.6 × 105 to 1.4 × 105 PFU/mL, with no significant differences between male and female mice or among mouse strains. For serum analysis, blood was drawn by retro-orbital puncture under anesthesia (isoflurane), and serum was isolated by low speed centrifugation and frozen until use. Except in rare cases when mice were found dead (<20% of the mice), throughout this study we used humane endpoint criteria including in experiments determining survival/mortality rates, i.e. mice were monitored daily and humanely euthanized under anesthesia (isoflurane) when exhibiting any of the following symptoms for longer than 24 hrs, including hunched posture with lethargy, labored breathing, lack of righting reflex, no response to mild stimuli, and signs of hind area edema.
Study approval
Mice were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions, and all experimental protocols were performed according to the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by The Scripps Research Institute Animal Care and Use Committee.
Cell preparations
Single cell suspensions were prepared from bone marrow (BM), blood, and spleen. B cells were purified from spleen using magnetic beads (MACS, Miltenyi Biotec), while enriched populations of pDCs were prepared by culturing BM cells with recombinant FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt3L, R&D Systems) [30, 32].
FACS
For surface staining, cells were incubated with fluorochrome- or biotin-labeled antibodies specific for mouse CD11c, PDCA-1, Siglec-H, B220, CD11b, CD4, CD8, CD44, CD19, CD21, CD23, CD86, I-Ad or H2-Kd (BD Pharmingen, Biolegend or eBioscience), followed by streptavidin in the case of biotinylated antibodies, as described [30, 32]. Cells were then washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformadehyde. For intracellular staining, fixed cells were permeabilized with 2% saponin or permeabilization solution (BD, Pharmingen), and incubated with specific antibodies (anti-Foxp3; anti-LCMV-NP, VL-4). Surface and intracellularly stained cells were acquired on a BD FACSDiva-driven LSR II flow cytometer, and data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Treestar).
ELISA
Serum levels of polyclonal IgM and IgG and anti-chromatin IgG subclasses were determined in individual mice by triplicate ELISA analysis using 96-well plates coated with goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) or chromatin, respectively. Bound antibodies were detected using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat antibodies to mouse IgM, IgG or IgG subclasses (Southern Biotech), and standard curves were generated using calibrated mouse serum (Nordic Immunology). Commercial ELISA kits were used to examine IFN-α (PBL InterferonSource), TNF-α or IL-6 (Biolegend) levels in mouse sera and supernatants of B cell and DC cultures.
Luminescence bioassay
Serum levels of IFN-I induced by LCMV infection were determined using a mouse L929 cell line stably transfected with a IFN-stimulated response element-dependent luciferase (ISRE-luc) construct. These cells were incubated with mouse serum for 5 h, washed, lysed with reporter lysis buffer (Promega), and frozen overnight at -80 °C. After thawing, luciferase solution was added, and luminescence was read 5 min later.
Anti-nuclear and anti-erythrocyte autoantibodies
Anti-nuclear autoantibodies (ANA) were detected by incubating HEp-2 slides (Bion Enterprises) with individual mouse serum (serial dilutions of 1/10 to 1/3000), followed by Alexa-Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen). Fluorescence intensity was quantified for each mouse using ImageJ (National Institute of Health). Erythrocyte-bound autoantibodies were quantified by flow cytometry after sequential incubation of washed red blood cells (RBC) with biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgG (MP Biomedicals) and streptavidin-PE (Biolegend). For each sample, the geometric mean fluorescence intensity (GMFI) was calculated by subtracting the background determined by incubating washed RBCs with streptavidin-PE only.
In vitro and in vivo TLR responses
Purified splenic B cells and BM-derived cDCs and pDCs isolated from individual mice were stimulated or not with mouse IFN-α11 (1000 U/ml, Miltenyi Biotec), the TLR7 ligand R848 (1 μg/ml, InvivoGen), the TLR9 ligand ODN-2216 (CpG, 1 μg/ml, InvivoGen), anti-IgM (20 μg/ml, eBioscience), or combinations thereof. At the indicated time-points, cells were harvested, counted, and analyzed by flow cytometry, while supernatants were assayed for cytokines by ELISA. In vivo TLR9 stimulation was induced by injecting mice i.v. with 2 μg CpG-A (ODN-2216) mixed with the cationic lipid DOTAP. Six hours later, serum was collected and tested for the presence of IFN-α by ELISA.
Kidney pathology and immunohistology
Proteinuria was determined using Albustix strips (Bayer Corporation) and graded semiquantitatively (0 = negative to traces, 1 = 30mg/ml; 2 = 100 mg/ml, 3 = 300 mg/ml, 4 = 2000 mg/ml). Tissue sections were fixed in zinc formalin and stained with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) or snap-frozen in OCT for immunofluorescence. Severity of glomerulonephritis (GN) was determined as described [33] by analyzing >50 representative glomeruli which were graded blindly on a 0 to 4 scale, where 0 = no pathology, 1 = minimal mesangial thickening, 2 = noticeable increases in both mesangium and glomerular cellularity, 3 = the preceding features plus inflammatory exudates and/or capsular adhesion, and 4 = obliteration of glomerular architecture involving >70% of glomeruli; a score ≥ 2.0 was considered pathologic. Kidney sections were also examined by immunofluorescence for the presence of immune deposits using antibodies to mouse IgG2a (Invitrogen) and C3 (Nordic Immunology). Fluorescence intensity was quantified for each mouse using ImageJ (National Institute of Health).
Statistical analysis
Group comparisons were performed by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. Survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier plot and log-rank test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
LCMV infection accelerates lupus-like disease in NZB mice
To study the contribution of virus infections to lupus pathogenesis, we examined disease development in NZB mice persistently infected with two different LCMV isolates, Armstrong (ARM) and clone 13 (Cl13). When inoculated intravenously (i.v.) into adult mice of most strains, ARM induces the rapid generation of specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) that mediate virus clearance within 7–10 days, whereas Cl13 induces functional T cell exhaustion, resulting in a chronic infection typically lasting >90 days [24]. In contrast, either of these LCMV strains causes lifelong persistent infection in mice inoculated during fetal life or early after birth due to deletion or suppression of LCMV-specific T cells [34]. Accordingly, neonatal inoculation (<24 h after birth) of NZB mice with either ARM or Cl13 resulted in persistent infection, shown by serum virus titers of 1.01 ± 0.19 × 105 PFU/mL in adult (2–3 mo-old) mice. We found that, at the age of 2 and 5 mo, infected NZB mice had significantly elevated serum polyclonal IgM (not shown) and IgG levels (Fig 1A). Similarly, IgG anti-erythrocyte autoantibodies, a typical manifestation of the NZB disease, were already detectable at 2 mo of age and reached high titers in >80% of the infected mice at 4 mo of age, when only <10% of uninfected controls were positive with low titers (Fig 1B). Infected NZB mice also exhibited increased levels of circulating IgG anti-nuclear autoantibodies (ANA) at age 2 mo (Fig 1C), while anti-chromatin IgG2a autoantibodies, the dominant subclass in this model, were detectable at 3 mo, i.e. ~3–4 mo earlier than in controls (Fig 1D). The high levels of autoantibodies in infected mice was associated with markedly accelerated renal disease, evidenced by increases in proteinuria (Fig 2A), IgG2a and C3 kidney deposits, and glomerulonephritis (GN) scores (Fig 2B–2D). Remarkably, 6 mo-old infected mice had worse GN scores than 11 mo-old uninfected controls. Consequently, survival was significantly shortened in infected mice, with a 50% mortality of 6 mo vs. 13 mo in the control group (Fig 2E). For all tested parameters, disease aggravation by LCMV infection was similar in male and female mice. These results show that persistent infection with LCMV severely accelerates lupus-like disease in NZB mice.
Synergism between virus infection and genetic susceptibility
We next assessed the impact of neonatal viral infection on lupus-like manifestations in mice with various degrees of genetic susceptibility, including male BXSB mice with early-onset severe autoimmunity due to a Y chromosome-associated Tlr7 gene duplication [35, 36], female BXSB mice with late onset, low-incidence mild disease, and non-autoimmune C57BL/6 mice. Persistent infection with LCMV Cl13 did not significantly accelerate the already severe disease of male BXSB mice, nor it induced autoimmunity in male or female C57BL/6 mice, based on anti-chromatin autoantibody levels, proteinuria, and mortality (S1 Fig). In contrast, disease was strongly accelerated in neonatally infected female BXSB mice, evidenced by earlier detection of IgG2a anti-chromatin autoantibodies (2 mo vs. >5 mo in controls), proteinuria (4–5 mo vs. >8 mo in controls), and 50% mortality (7.3 mo vs. >18 mo in controls) (Fig 3). Differences in disease among groups could not be attributed to variations in virus persistence, as indicated by similar serum titers in 2–3 mo old mice (1.04 ± 0.32 × 105 PFU/mL in male BXSB; 0.95 ± 0.15 × 105 in female BXSB; 0.93 ± 0.08 × 105 in male C57BL/6 mice; 0.96 ± 0.22 × 105 in female C57BL/6 mice). Thus, neonatal LCMV infection can, to a significant extent, mimic the effect of the Tlr7 duplication, leading to enhanced disease severity in female BXSB mice with otherwise weak genetic predisposition.
Enhanced accumulation of activated B cells, T cells and pDCs in persistently infected lupus mice
To define the mechanistic basis of virus-induced autoimmunity acceleration, we assessed the effect of infection on the cellularity and activation phenotype of innate and adaptive immunocyte populations. Consistent with earlier findings in non-autoimmune C57BL/6 mice [37] and reflecting the cellular distribution of alpha-dystroglycan, the main receptor for LCMV [24, 38], neonatal inoculation of NZB mice with LCMV Cl13 resulted in the persistent infection of ~3–4% of spleen cells. Various degrees of infectivity were noted depending on cell type (S2 Fig), with minimal infection rates of B and T cells, except marginal zone B cells (9% LCMV+), and high infection rates of pDCs (45%), cDCs (49%), macrophages (81%), as well as monocytes and other CD11b+ cells (19%), of which Gr-1int cells were the most infected (38%), followed by Gr-1hi cells (14%) and Gr-1neg cells (11%).
Disease enhancement in infected NZB mice was associated with significant increases in spleen cellularity (~2.5-fold in 3 mo-old mice) primarily attributable to the expansion of B and T cells (Fig 4A). Among B cell subsets, the expansion mostly affected the CD21−CD23− population (Fig 4B), including the so-called “age-associated” B cells (ABCs), known to accumulate in aging humans and in mice and patients with systemic autoimmunity [39, 40]. The expansion of ABCs in infected NZB mice with accelerated disease was confirmed by analysis of CD19+CD11b+ cells at the age of 6 mo (18.7 ± 8.9% of CD19+ cells in infected mice vs. 7.4 ± 2.1% in non-infected controls, p<0.05). The number of CD21lowCD23+ follicular B cells was also increased in 3 mo-old infected mice, whereas no significant changes were noted for CD21+CD23− marginal zone B cells (Fig 4B). Expansion of the T cell compartment in infected NZB mice included both CD4+ and CD8+ subsets, which maintained approximately the same ratio as in uninfected controls (Fig 4C). CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells [41] also increased proportionally in infected mice, resulting in a similar frequency as in control mice (24.2 ± 3.7% of CD4+ T cells in infected mice vs. 19.0 ± 2.8% in controls, p>0.05). Moreover, the enlarged T cell populations were significantly more activated in infected mice, shown by the increased expression of CD44 and CD69 and the increased frequency of cells displaying high levels of CD44 in CD4+ and CD8+ subsets, and CD69 in the CD4+ subset (Fig 4D).
Analysis of innate immune cells showed a significant increase in the number of pDCs in the spleen of neonatally infected NZB mice compared to controls (Fig 5A). A trend toward increased cellularity was also noted for cDCs, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (Fig 5A). In infected mice, pDCs (but not cDCs) were also more activated, shown by upregulation of CD86 and MHC class II (I-Ad) molecules (Fig 5B). Further analysis revealed that in infected mice LCMV+ pDCs expressed significantly higher levels of CD86 than LCMV−pDCs (Panel A in S3 Fig), suggesting activation by cell-intrinsic virus-sensing pathways. Nevertheless, LCMV−pDCs from infected mice displayed comparable levels of MHC class II as LCMV+ pDCs (Panel B in S3 Fig), suggesting additional contributions by cell-extrinsic factors, including IFN-I and other inflammatory cytokines produced in response to virus sensing. Likewise, in infected mice CD86 expression was slightly increased in LCMV+ relative to LCMV−cDCs (Panel C in S3 Fig), whereas MHC class II expression was rather decreased (Panel D in S3 Fig). Additional infection-associated variations included reductions in the frequency and numbers of macrophages (Fig 5C) and in the frequency of CD11b+ monocytes (Fig 5C and 5D), including Gr-1neg cells known to expand in other models of spontaneous lupus [42]. Collectively, these results indicate that disease acceleration following neonatal inoculation of NZB mice with LCMV correlates with the persistent infection of large fractions of pDCs, cDCs, monocytes and macrophages, and accumulation of activated pDCs, B cells and T cells.
LCMV infection potentiates B cell responses but reduces pDC responses to endosomal TLR stimulation
A critical pathogenic event in spontaneous lupus is the engagement of endosomal TLRs by self-nucleic acids in B cells and pDCs, and this response could be magnified in LCMV-infected mice with accelerated disease. To address this possibility, purified splenic B cells from 3 mo-old NZB mice were stimulated in vitro with ligands for TLR7 (R848) or TLR9 (CpG DNA), in the presence or absence of IFN-α. B cells from infected mice responded more efficiently to TLR stimulation (Fig 6A), an effect possibly due to in vivo priming by virus-induced IFN-I since hyperresponsiveness was recapitulated with control B cells upon exposure to high concentration of IFN-α. Moreover, B cells from infected mice showed markedly increased responses to concurrent anti-IgM-mediated BCR crosslinking and TLR7 or TLR9 stimulation (Fig 6B).
We next compared TLR responses by pDCs from neonatally infected vs. control NZB mice. These cells were enriched by Flt3L-induced in vitro differentiation of bone marrow (BM) cells from 3 mo old donors. Differentiation was similarly efficient for cells from infected and control mice (Panel A in S4 Fig), even though approximately 51% of BM-pDCs from infected mice were LCMV+ (Panel B in S4 Fig), a rate comparable to that observed by ex vivo analysis of splenic pDCs (S2 Fig). Phenotypic characterization before TLR stimulation showed that BM-pDCs from infected mice were significantly more activated than those from control mice, indicated by upregulation of CD86 (Panel C in S4 Fig) and MHC class I (H2-Kd) molecules (Panel D in S4 Fig). As observed with splenic pDCs, LCMV+ BM-pDCs were more activated and expressed higher levels of CD86 and H2-Kd than LCMV−BM-pDCs, with the latter displaying an activation profile very similar to BM-pDCs from uninfected control mice (Panels C and D in S4 Fig). Surprisingly, unlike B cells, BM-pDCs from infected mice responded less efficiently to TLR7 or TLR9 stimulation than BM-pDCs from uninfected mice, indicated by reduced secretion of IFN-I, TNF-α, and IL-6 and impaired upregulation of CD86 and H2-Kd (Fig 6C).
To corroborate in vivo the evidence that pDCs of infected mice exhibit defective endosomal TLR responses, neonatally infected and control NZB mice were injected intravenously at age 3 mo with the TLR9 agonist CpG-2216. Previous studies with knockin Ifna6-GFP [43] or Ifnb-EYFP [44] reporter mice showed that in vivo stimulation with CpG specifically activates IFN-I production by pDCs but not other cells, which was confirmed by the absence of serum IFN-I in pDC-deficient NZB.Irf8–/–mice injected with CpG-2216 (S5 Fig). Consistent with the in vitro results presented above, we found that infected mice failed to produce detectable amounts of IFN-I following in vivo CpG challenge (Fig 6D). Overall, these in vitro and in vivo findings indicate that, in persistently infected mice with accelerated lupus, B cells are hyperresponsive, whereas pDCs are hyporesponsive, to endosomal TLR stimulation.
pDCs are required for LCMV-induced lupus acceleration in NZB mice
The impaired endosomal TLR responses of pDCs from LCMV-infected NZB mice raised the possibility that these cells might not be critical for virus-induced disease acceleration. To address this issue, we assessed lupus progression in WT and Irf8−/−NZB mice neonatally infected or not with LCMV. As previously reported [30], Irf8−/−NZB mice lacked pDCs due to developmental arrest and were protected from spontaneous lupus-like disease, despite normal B cell responses to TLR stimulation and exogenous antigens. Although Irf8−/−NZB mice also lack CD8α+ DCs, these cells have not been implicated in systemic autoimmunity, and therefore reduced lupus-like disease in Irf8−/−NZB mice was attributed to lack of pDCs [30]. We found that persistent LCMV infection (0.89 ± 0.23 × 105 PFU/mL at 3 mo of age) failed to precipitate lupus manifestations in pDC-deficient Irf8−/−NZB mice. Thus, while infected WT NZB mice showed 100% mortality at ~6 mo of age, all infected and uninfected Irf8−/−NZB mice were still alive when 10 mo-old (Fig 7A). Moreover, even at advanced age and regardless of whether they had been infected, IRF8-deficient mice showed no signs of disease, including splenomegaly (Fig 7B) and autoantibodies to erythrocytes or chromatin (Fig 7C). These results are consistent with the notion that pDCs are essential for virus-induced lupus disease acceleration in chronically infected mice.
Sensing by endosomal TLRs mediates lupus enhancement in LCMV-infected NZB mice
Sensing of LCMV via TLR7 may be a major mechanism for disease enhancement in infected mice. However, LCMV also induces potent IFN-I and anti-viral T cell responses through TLR-independent pathways mediated by the cytosolic RNA sensor MDA5 (and possibly RIG-I) and signaling via the mitochondrial adaptor MAVS [45–51]. To determine whether virus-mediated innate immune activation by the MAVS pathway is of sufficient magnitude to sustain disease in the absence of endosomal TLR signaling, we examined the effect of LCMV infection in NZB mice congenic for the 3d mutation of the Unc93b1 gene, in which signaling by endosomal TLRs is extinguished and spontaneous disease averted [31]. In short-term experiments, LCMV-induced IFN-I production in NZB.3d mice was reduced at 16 h post-infection, but was comparable to WT NZB mice between 24 and 72 h post-infection (Panel A in S6 Fig). In contrast, this response was completely suppressed in homozygous double-deficient 3d/Mavs mice of mixed NZB×C57BL/6 background lacking both endosomal TLR and MAVS signaling (Panel B in S6 Fig), confirming the contribution of the MAVS pathway to the LCMV response in 3d mutant mice. However, despite the efficient MAVS-dependent innate immune response, NZB.3d mice were found to be protected from systemic autoimmunity even when persistently infected with LCMV. Thus, compared to infected WT NZB mice, infected NZB.3d mice with persistent LCMV infection (1.06 ± 0.18 × 105 PFU/mL serum at 3 mo of age) survived significantly longer (Fig 7A) and, when 5 mo old, had normal spleen size (Fig 7B), undetectable levels of autoantibodies to red blood cells and chromatin (Fig 7C), and negligible kidney disease (Fig 7D). Similarly, at age 10 mo, infected NZB.3d mice showed no splenomegaly or anti-chromatin autoantibodies (Fig 7B and 7C), while GN scores were modestly increased compared to uninfected 3d controls, suggesting weak TLR-independent effects on kidney pathology (Fig 7D). We conclude that, even though the in vivo anti-LCMV response is to a large extent mediated by cytosolic MAVS-dependent RNA sensors, endosomal TLR signaling is crucial for LCMV-induced disease acceleration in NZB mice.
Discussion
In this study, we report that persistent infection with LCMV exacerbates systemic autoimmunity in lupus-prone NZB mice and even in female BXSB mice with mild spontaneous disease due to the absence of the Y chromosome-associated autoimmunity accelerator. Moreover, disease was abrogated in infected NZB mice lacking pDCs or endosomal TLR function, despite the evidence that LCMV strongly stimulates innate immune activation through the engagement of cytosolic RNA helicases and signaling via the adaptor MAVS in cDCs. These results are consistent with the critical role of endosomal nucleic acid sensing in systemic autoimmunity and demonstrate that potent TLR-independent IFN-I production by cells other than pDCs is insufficient for disease promotion.
Human studies to identify potential associations between viruses and autoimmunity are hampered by several limitations, including the possibility that specific infections may precipitate autoimmune disease in predisposed individuals but not in most people, and that disease-enhancing viruses may be cleared by the time symptoms of autoimmunity appear. Thus, as shown in this study, dissecting the interplay between virus infection and genetic susceptibility to autoimmunity and defining the mechanistic basis of disease modification may be facilitated by the use of well-characterized mouse and virus models, wherein host background genes, virus types, cell tropism, and persistence can be precisely controlled.
We found that chronic LCMV infection enhanced systemic autoimmunity in genetically predisposed but not in normal background mice. Association studies in SLE identified >80 genetic loci each contributing a small effect size, and thus aggregation of a sufficient number of them is required to attain the threshold for disease susceptibility [15]. However, in some individuals the number of predisposing gene variants is insufficient, and disease onset and severity depend on additional, most likely environmental, factors. Studies in mouse models of spontaneous lupus also showed disease dependency on multiple predisposing genes, with the contribution of few higher impact accelerator genes in some strains [52], such as the Tlr7 gene duplication leading to increased TLR7 responses to RNA stimuli in male BXSB mice [35, 36]. Our result that LCMV infection converted the late, low-grade disease of female BXSB mice into an early disease almost as severe as the spontaneous disease of male BXSB mice indicates that certain infections may act as autoimmune disease modifiers by potentiating the effects of predisposing gene variants. In contrast, LCMV infection did not further enhance the severe disease of male BXSB mice, nor it induced autoimmune manifestations in non-susceptible C57BL/6 mice, indicating that the ability of a virus to trigger or worsen autoimmunity depends on the level of genetic predisposition. Thus, if the present results can be extended to human autoimmunity, one could envisage three categories of individuals in which disease might be differentially affected by superimposed viral infections: a) individuals with very low genetic predisposition, in which viral infections are insufficient to provoke autoimmunity; b) individuals with high genetic predisposition, who develop autoimmunity spontaneously without the need of an external stimulus; and c) individuals with limited genetic predisposition, which can however be complemented by infections that raise the risk level above a critical threshold. The low concordance of autoimmunity in identical twins suggests that most patients with autoimmune disease may fall in the latter group. Studying the combinatorial effects of infections and genetic susceptibility will therefore be essential to fully understand the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases.
Several mechanisms have been evoked to explain how a virus may precipitate or accelerate autoimmunity, including molecular mimicry by viral antigens displaying sequence or conformational similarities to self-antigens, tissue damage leading to self-antigen release and presentation to previously quiescent or ignorant T and B cells, and bystander activation of autoreactive lymphocytes concurrent with the induction of the anti-viral response [19, 53]. In our model of LCMV-induced autoimmunity acceleration, molecular mimicry seems unlikely to be the main mechanism, given the relatively small LCMV genome (only encoding four proteins) as opposed to the diversity of B and T cell specificities in lupus-like disease. Tissue damage also appears not to be a main contributor, since LCMV is generally non-cytopathic, and virus-specific T cells that may cause immunopathology are deleted or tolerant in this model of neonatal infection [24, 34]. In contrast, although a conventional adaptive anti-viral response is not induced, virus-mediated activation of the innate immune system and the ensuing bystander activation of autoreactive B and T cells appeared critical factors for enhanced disease severity.
The requirement of pDCs and endosomal TLRs implicates viral nucleic acids, the main immunostimulatory feature of LCMV, in lupus acceleration. Nucleic acid recognition constitutes a key pathogenic mechanism of systemic autoimmunity [54, 55]. Self-nucleic acids in lupus can be presented in the form of autoantibody immune complexes, membrane-coated microparticles [56, 57], neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) or oxidized mitochondrial DNA [58, 59], and can induce TLR7/9-dependent B cell activation and IFN-I production by pDCs and follicular DCs [2, 3, 60]. Although the mechanisms explaining accumulation of stimulatory nucleic acids in lupus have not been fully defined, excessive production and/or impaired elimination of nucleic acid-containing apoptotic materials have been implicated [61]. Excess of nucleic acids in SLE and other inflammatory/autoimmune conditions may also be due to rare deficiencies in specific nucleases [57, 62–66], modifications of nucleic acids that confer resistance to degradation [67], or aberrant expression of endogenous retroelements [68–70]. As shown in the present study, excess of stimulatory nucleic acids can also result from a persistent viral infection. In the case of LCMV, stimulatory RNA can occur within infectious or immature viral particles, as well as within exosome-like vesicles secreted by infected cells, shown to most effectively trigger TLR7-dependent IFN-I production by pDCs through a cell-cell contact-mediated mechanism [71]. Whether differences in nuclease activity or nucleic acid sensor signaling contribute to the differential effect of viral nucleic acids on autoimmunity in susceptible vs. resistant individuals remains to be determined.
In LCMV-infected NZB mice, pDCs were significantly expanded, activated, and strictly required for disease exacerbation. The non-redundant role of pDCs in this model is in line with the requirement of these cells for spontaneous disease. In lupus, pDCs can secrete large amounts of IFN-I particularly in response to nucleic acid-containing immune complexes, promote autoreactive B and T cell activation, accumulate in afflicted tissues, and produce chemokines that mediate inflammatory infiltrates [2, 72]. More directly, the key function of pDCs in lupus was shown by disease reduction in predisposed mice in which pDCs were absent, functionally impaired or transiently depleted [30, 73, 74], whereas lupus-like manifestations developed in Siglec-H-deficient mice with hyperresponsive pDCs [75]. Despite being required for lupus acceleration, pDCs from infected mice were hyporesponsive to endosomal TLR stimulation, consistent with the high frequency of LCMV+ pDCs and the evidence that the arenavirus-encoded nucleoprotein and Z protein exert inhibitory effects on IFN-I production in infected cells [76, 77]. Moreover, in vivo experiments showed that pDCs are not the main contributors to the innate response induced by LCMV, since pDC depletion reduced systemic IFN-I levels within the first 16–24 hours post-infection but had no effects on the peak IFN-I production at 24–72 hours post-infection [46, 50, 51]. Nonetheless, our results indicated that in LCMV-infected mice there is a sufficient number of newly emerging, as yet uninfected pDCs that serve crucial functions in the interplay of innate and adaptive autoimmune responses. In addition, it is conceivable that other innate cells contribute to virus-induced disease enhancement, particularly cDCs, the main producers of IFN-I in LCMV-infected mice [51], and follicular DCs, recently identified as a critical source of IFN-I in germinal centers in response to immune complexes of autoantibodies, ribonucleoproteins and complement, leading to autoreactive B cell activation [60].
As in spontaneous lupus, the engagement of endosomal TLRs was necessary for disease exacerbation in LCMV-infected NZB mice. Previous in vivo studies showed that LCMV potently induces IFN-I production even in the absence of endosomal TLRs, by activating the cytosolic RNA-sensing pathway mediated by MDA5 (and possibly RIG-I) and the adaptor MAVS [45–51]. The observation that high IFN-I production by this cytosolic pathway is not sufficient to elicit autoimmunity suggests that TLRs may be more efficient in the induction of other proinflammatory molecules, including IL-6 known to promote lupus in mice and humans [78]. In addition, endosomal TLRs may be required for their cell-intrinsic role in the activation of pDCs and other cell types following stimulation with nucleic acid-associated self-antigens and/or immune complexes, particularly B cells [31, 79, 80], cDCs [81], and follicular DCs [60]. Nevertheless, despite the central role of TLRs, hyperactivation of the cytosolic pathway by viral RNA may also contribute to disease acceleration. Consistent with this possibility, polymorphisms in the MDA5-encoding IFIH1 gene have been associated with SLE and other autoimmune conditions [7–10], spontaneous or oxidative stress-induced aggregation of MAVS was observed in some SLE patients [11], and overexpression or gain-of-function mutation of MDA5 enhanced disease in lupus mice [12–14]. Additional studies with MAVS mutant and bone marrow chimeric mice will be required to elucidate the specific and combinatorial contributions of the endosomal and cytosolic pathways to spontaneous and virus-enhanced lupus. Nonetheless, our results suggest that the aggravating effect of an overactive cytosolic pathway in systemic autoimmunity is contingent on efficient endosomal TLR signaling.
We previously proposed that systemic autoimmunity may develop in a two-phase process [82]. The first phase is relatively inefficient and mediated by self-nucleic acids within apoptotic cell debris leading to a first wave of IFN-I production and autoreactive B and T cell activation, while the second phase involves a positive feedback loop mediated by nucleic acid-containing autoantibody immune complexes, which are taken up by pDCs and other cell types resulting in efficient TLR engagement and amplification of the inflammatory response. The present findings suggest that LCMV and possibly other viruses promote disease exacerbation primarily by accelerating the initiation phase of the autoimmune response. In a plausible scenario, owing to the expression of a diverse set of chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules [72], non-infected pDCs traffic to specific sites within lymphoid organs and inflamed tissues, where they encounter significant numbers of infected cells, particularly cDCs and macrophages. The uptake of exosome-associated viral RNA by pDCs [71] leads to TLR engagement and local production of large amounts of IFN-I followed by enhanced self-antigen presentation and activation of autoreactive B and T cells. Signaling via cytosolic RNA sensors and MAVS may further boost this early phase of the autoimmune process, although this pathway is ineffective in the absence of endosomal TLRs or pDCs. Viral nucleic acids may also promote the second phase, although, once induced, autoantibodies and related immune complexes are likely sufficient to sustain disease progression. Future studies in which LCMV clearance is induced at different time-points post-infection will clarify the effects of LCMV during the early vs. late phases of autoimmunity. Nonetheless, the importance of pDC activation at early disease stages is consistent with studies suggesting that pDC depletion [74] or IFNAR blockade [83] more efficiently reduce systemic autoimmunity when applied before a critical threshold of immune activation is exceeded.
Overall, using LCMV infection as a model, we showed that viral persistence caused severe disease exacerbation in lupus-prone but not in normal mice, demonstrating that viruses can act as triggers or amplifiers of autoimmune responses only if combined with critical predisposing abnormalities, including increases in self-antigen presentation, inflammatory stimuli, and autoreactive cells displaying heightened affinity and/or sensitivity to activation. Consistent with their primary role in spontaneous lupus, pDCs and the endosomal TLR pathway of innate immune activation were found to be necessary for disease acceleration in NZB mice, despite the efficient induction of IFN-I by viral RNA via cytosolic helicases and MAVS. Further experiments using additional virus and mouse models combined with well-designed clinical studies will be required to draw more definitive conclusions on the effects of virus infections on autoimmune disease expression and the underlying pathogenic mechanisms. Nevertheless, our current results suggest that therapeutic targeting of pDCs and endosomal TLRs may have universal applicability in SLE and other systemic autoimmune conditions, including when disease activity is magnified by a viral infection and/or an overactive cytosolic pathway of nucleic acid sensing.
Supporting information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, grant AI121525 to RB. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Kaul A, Gordon C, Crow MK, Touma Z, Urowitz MB, van Vollenhoven R, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16039 10.1038/nrdp.2016.39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ronnblom L. The type I interferon system in the etiopathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Upsala journal of medical sciences. 2011;116(4):227–37. 10.3109/03009734.2011.624649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Marshak-Rothstein A. Toll-like receptors in systemic autoimmune disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6(11):823–35. 10.1038/nri1957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Crow MK. Type I interferon in the pathogenesis of lupus. J Immunol. 2014;192(12):5459–68. 10.4049/jimmunol.1002795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Banchereau R, Cepika AM, Banchereau J, Pascual V. Understanding Human Autoimmunity and Autoinflammation Through Transcriptomics. Annu Rev Immunol. 2017;35:337–70. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-051116-052225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Theofilopoulos AN, Kono DH, Baccala R. The multiple pathways to autoimmunity. Nat Immunol. 2017;18(7):716–24. 10.1038/ni.3731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Robinson T, Kariuki SN, Franek BS, Kumabe M, Kumar AA, Badaracco M, et al. Autoimmune disease risk variant of IFIH1 is associated with increased sensitivity to IFN-alpha and serologic autoimmunity in lupus patients. J Immunol. 2011;187(3):1298–303. 10.4049/jimmunol.1100857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Oda H, Nakagawa K, Abe J, Awaya T, Funabiki M, Hijikata A, et al. Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome is caused by IFIH1 mutations. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;95(1):121–5. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.06.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rice GI, del Toro Duany Y, Jenkinson EM, Forte GM, Anderson BH, Ariaudo G, et al. Gain-of-function mutations in IFIH1 cause a spectrum of human disease phenotypes associated with upregulated type I interferon signaling. Nat Genet. 2014;46(5):503–9. 10.1038/ng.2933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Van Eyck L, De Somer L, Pombal D, Bornschein S, Frans G, Humblet-Baron S, et al. Brief Report: IFIH1 Mutation Causes Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With Selective IgA Deficiency. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(6):1592–7. 10.1002/art.39110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Buskiewicz IA, Montgomery T, Yasewicz EC, Huber SA, Murphy MP, Hartley RC, et al. Reactive oxygen species induce virus-independent MAVS oligomerization in systemic lupus erythematosus. Sci Signal. 2016;9(456):ra115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Crampton SP, Deane JA, Feigenbaum L, Bolland S. Ifih1 gene dose effect reveals MDA5-mediated chronic type I IFN gene signature, viral resistance, and accelerated autoimmunity. J Immunol. 2012;188(3):1451–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.1102705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Funabiki M, Kato H, Miyachi Y, Toki H, Motegi H, Inoue M, et al. Autoimmune disorders associated with gain of function of the intracellular sensor MDA5. Immunity. 2014;40(2):199–212. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.12.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gorman JA, Hundhausen C, Errett JS, Stone AE, Allenspach EJ, Ge Y, et al. The A946T variant of the RNA sensor IFIH1 mediates an interferon program that limits viral infection but increases the risk for autoimmunity. Nat Immunol. 2017;18(7):744–52. 10.1038/ni.3766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen L, Morris DL, Vyse TJ. Genetic advances in systemic lupus erythematosus: an update. Current opinion in rheumatology. 2017;29(5):423–33. 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Block SR, Winfield JB, Lockshin MD, D’Angelo WA, Christian CL. Studies of twins with systemic lupus erythematosus. A review of the literature and presentation of 12 additional sets. The American journal of medicine. 1975;59(4):533–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Deapen D, Escalante A, Weinrib L, Horwitz D, Bachman B, Roy-Burman P, et al. A revised estimate of twin concordance in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35(3):311–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jarvinen P, Kaprio J, Makitalo R, Koskenvuo M, Aho K. Systemic lupus erythematosus and related systemic diseases in a nationwide twin cohort: an increased prevalence of disease in MZ twins and concordance of disease features. J Intern Med. 1992;231(1):67–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chervonsky AV. Influence of microbial environment on autoimmunity. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(1):28–35. 10.1038/ni.1801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.James JA, Robertson JM. Lupus and Epstein-Barr. Current opinion in rheumatology. 2012;24(4):383–8. 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283535801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pavlovic M, Kats A, Cavallo M, Shoenfeld Y. Clinical and molecular evidence for association of SLE with parvovirus B19. Lupus. 2010;19(7):783–92. 10.1177/0961203310365715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Halenius A, Hengel H. Human cytomegalovirus and autoimmune disease. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:472978 10.1155/2014/472978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gupta N, Nguyen CQ, Modica RF, Elder ME, Garin EH. BK viruria and viremia in children with systemic lupus erythematosus. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2017;15(1):21 10.1186/s12969-017-0156-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Oldstone MB, Campbell KP. Decoding arenavirus pathogenesis: essential roles for alpha-dystroglycan-virus interactions and the immune response. Virology. 2011;411(2):170–9. 10.1016/j.virol.2010.11.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tonietti G, Oldstone MB, Dixon FJ. The effect of induced chronic viral infections on the immunologic diseases of New Zealand mice. J Exp Med. 1970;132(1):89–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Borrow P, Evans CF, Oldstone MB. Virus-induced immunosuppression: immune system-mediated destruction of virus-infected dendritic cells results in generalized immune suppression. J Virol. 1995;69(2):1059–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Emonet SF, Garidou L, McGavern DB, de la Torre JC. Generation of recombinant lymphocytic choriomeningitis viruses with trisegmented genomes stably expressing two additional genes of interest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(9):3473–8. 10.1073/pnas.0900088106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ahmed R, Salmi A, Butler LD, Chiller JM, Oldstone MB. Selection of genetic variants of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus in spleens of persistently infected mice. Role in suppression of cytotoxic T lymphocyte response and viral persistence. J Exp Med. 1984;160(2):521–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tabeta K, Hoebe K, Janssen EM, Du X, Georgel P, Crozat K, et al. The Unc93b1 mutation 3d disrupts exogenous antigen presentation and signaling via Toll-like receptors 3, 7 and 9. Nat Immunol. 2006;7(2):156–64. 10.1038/ni1297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Baccala R, Gonzalez-Quintial R, Blasius AL, Rimann I, Ozato K, Kono DH, et al. Essential requirement for IRF8 and SLC15A4 implicates plasmacytoid dendritic cells in the pathogenesis of lupus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(8):2940–5. 10.1073/pnas.1222798110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Koh YT, Scatizzi JC, Gahan JD, Lawson BR, Baccala R, Pollard KM, et al. Role of Nucleic Acid-Sensing TLRs in Diverse Autoantibody Specificities and Anti-Nuclear Antibody-Producing B Cells. J Immunol. 2013;190(10):4982–90. 10.4049/jimmunol.1202986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gonzalez-Quintial R, Lawson BR, Scatizzi JC, Craft J, Kono DH, Baccala R, et al. Systemic Autoimmunity and Lymphoproliferation Are Associated with Excess IL-7 and Inhibited by IL-7Ralpha Blockade. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27528 10.1371/journal.pone.0027528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Andrews BS, Eisenberg RA, Theofilopoulos AN, Izui S, Wilson CB, McConahey PJ, et al. Spontaneous murine lupus-like syndromes. Clinical and immunopathological manifestations in several strains. J Exp Med. 1978;148(5):1198–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jamieson BD, Ahmed R. T-cell tolerance: exposure to virus in utero does not cause a permanent deletion of specific T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85(7):2265–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pisitkun P, Deane JA, Difilippantonio MJ, Tarasenko T, Satterthwaite AB, Bolland S. Autoreactive B cell responses to RNA-related antigens due to TLR7 gene duplication. Science. 2006;312(5780):1669–72. 10.1126/science.1124978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Subramanian S, Tus K, Li QZ, Wang A, Tian XH, Zhou J, et al. A Tlr7 translocation accelerates systemic autoimmunity in murine lupus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(26):9970–5. 10.1073/pnas.0603912103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Homann D, McGavern DB, Oldstone MB. Visualizing the viral burden: phenotypic and functional alterations of T cells and APCs during persistent infection. J Immunol. 2004;172(10):6239–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kunz S, Sevilla N, McGavern DB, Campbell KP, Oldstone MB. Molecular analysis of the interaction of LCMV with its cellular receptor [alpha]-dystroglycan. J Cell Biol. 2001;155(2):301–10. 10.1083/jcb.200104103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hao Y, O’Neill P, Naradikian MS, Scholz JL, Cancro MP. A B-cell subset uniquely responsive to innate stimuli accumulates in aged mice. Blood. 2011;118(5):1294–304. 10.1182/blood-2011-01-330530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rubtsov AV, Rubtsova K, Fischer A, Meehan RT, Gillis JZ, Kappler JW, et al. Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7)-driven accumulation of a novel CD11c B-cell population is important for the development of autoimmunity. Blood. 2011;118(5):1305–15. 10.1182/blood-2011-01-331462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sakaguchi S, Yamaguchi T, Nomura T, Ono M. Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell. 2008;133(5):775–87. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Santiago-Raber ML, Amano H, Amano E, Baudino L, Otani M, Lin Q, et al. Fcgamma receptor-dependent expansion of a hyperactive monocyte subset in lupus-prone mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(8):2408–17. 10.1002/art.24787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kumagai Y, Takeuchi O, Kato H, Kumar H, Matsui K, Morii E, et al. Alveolar macrophages are the primary interferon-alpha producer in pulmonary infection with RNA viruses. Immunity. 2007;27(2):240–52. 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cisse B, Caton ML, Lehner M, Maeda T, Scheu S, Locksley R, et al. Transcription factor E2-2 is an essential and specific regulator of plasmacytoid dendritic cell development. Cell. 2008;135(1):37–48. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhou S, Cerny AM, Zacharia A, Fitzgerald KA, Kurt-Jones EA, Finberg RW. Induction and inhibition of type I interferon responses by distinct components of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. J Virol. 2010;84(18):9452–62. 10.1128/JVI.00155-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cervantes-Barragan L, Lewis KL, Firner S, Thiel V, Hugues S, Reith W, et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells control T-cell response to chronic viral infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(8):3012–7. 10.1073/pnas.1117359109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Clingan JM, Ostrow K, Hosiawa KA, Chen ZJ, Matloubian M. Differential roles for RIG-I-like receptors and nucleic acid-sensing TLR pathways in controlling a chronic viral infection. J Immunol. 2012;188(9):4432–40. 10.4049/jimmunol.1103656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Macal M, Lewis GM, Kunz S, Flavell R, Harker JA, Zuniga EI. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells are productively infected and activated through TLR-7 early after arenavirus infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;11(6):617–30. 10.1016/j.chom.2012.04.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Walsh KB, Teijaro JR, Zuniga EI, Welch MJ, Fremgen DM, Blackburn SD, et al. Toll-like receptor 7 is required for effective adaptive immune responses that prevent persistent virus infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;11(6):643–53. 10.1016/j.chom.2012.04.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang Y, Swiecki M, Cella M, Alber G, Schreiber RD, Gilfillan S, et al. Timing and magnitude of type I interferon responses by distinct sensors impact CD8 T cell exhaustion and chronic viral infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;11(6):631–42. 10.1016/j.chom.2012.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hervas-Stubbs S, Riezu-Boj JI, Mancheno U, Rueda P, Lopez L, Alignani D, et al. Conventional but not plasmacytoid dendritic cells foster the systemic virus-induced type I IFN response needed for efficient CD8 T cell priming. J Immunol. 2014;193(3):1151–61. 10.4049/jimmunol.1301440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Morel L. Genetics of SLE: evidence from mouse models. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6(6):348–57. 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Oldstone MB. Molecular mimicry and autoimmune disease. Cell. 1987;50(6):819–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Theofilopoulos AN, Kono DH, Beutler B, Baccala R. Intracellular nucleic acid sensors and autoimmunity. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2011;31(12):867–86. 10.1089/jir.2011.0092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Barrat FJ, Elkon KB, Fitzgerald KA. Importance of Nucleic Acid Recognition in Inflammation and Autoimmunity. Annu Rev Med. 2016;67:323–36. 10.1146/annurev-med-052814-023338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pisetsky DS, Gauley J, Ullal AJ. Microparticles as a source of extracellular DNA. Immunol Res. 2011;49(1–3):227–34. 10.1007/s12026-010-8184-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sisirak V, Sally B, D’Agati V, Martinez-Ortiz W, Ozcakar ZB, David J, et al. Digestion of Chromatin in Apoptotic Cell Microparticles Prevents Autoimmunity. Cell. 2016;166(1):88–101. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Caielli S, Athale S, Domic B, Murat E, Chandra M, Banchereau R, et al. Oxidized mitochondrial nucleoids released by neutrophils drive type I interferon production in human lupus. J Exp Med. 2016;213(5):697–713. 10.1084/jem.20151876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lood C, Blanco LP, Purmalek MM, Carmona-Rivera C, De Ravin SS, Smith CK, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps enriched in oxidized mitochondrial DNA are interferogenic and contribute to lupus-like disease. Nat Med. 2016;22(2):146–53. 10.1038/nm.4027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Das A, Heesters BA, Bialas A, O’Flynn J, Rifkin IR, Ochando J, et al. Follicular Dendritic Cell Activation by TLR Ligands Promotes Autoreactive B Cell Responses. Immunity. 2017;46(1):106–19. 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.12.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Shao WH, Cohen PL. Disturbances of apoptotic cell clearance in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(1):202 10.1186/ar3206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yasutomo K, Horiuchi T, Kagami S, Tsukamoto H, Hashimura C, Urushihara M, et al. Mutation of DNASE1 in people with systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Genet. 2001;28(4):313–4. 10.1038/91070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lee-Kirsch MA, Gong M, Chowdhury D, Senenko L, Engel K, Lee YA, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding the 3’-5’ DNA exonuclease TREX1 are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Genet. 2007;39(9):1065–7. 10.1038/ng2091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Al-Mayouf SM, Sunker A, Abdwani R, Abrawi SA, Almurshedi F, Alhashmi N, et al. Loss-of-function variant in DNASE1L3 causes a familial form of systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Genet. 2011;43(12):1186–8. 10.1038/ng.975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Gunther C, Kind B, Reijns MA, Berndt N, Martinez-Bueno M, Wolf C, et al. Defective removal of ribonucleotides from DNA promotes systemic autoimmunity. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(1):413–24. 10.1172/JCI78001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Crow YJ, Manel N. Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome and the type I interferonopathies. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15(7):429–40. 10.1038/nri3850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Gehrke N, Mertens C, Zillinger T, Wenzel J, Bald T, Zahn S, et al. Oxidative damage of DNA confers resistance to cytosolic nuclease TREX1 degradation and potentiates STING-dependent immune sensing. Immunity. 2013;39(3):482–95. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Stetson DB, Ko JS, Heidmann T, Medzhitov R. Trex1 prevents cell-intrinsic initiation of autoimmunity. Cell. 2008;134(4):587–98. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mavragani CP, Sagalovskiy I, Guo Q, Nezos A, Kapsogeorgou EK, Lu P, et al. Expression of Long Interspersed Nuclear Element 1 Retroelements and Induction of Type I Interferon in Patients With Systemic Autoimmune Disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(11):2686–96. 10.1002/art.39795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hung T, Pratt GA, Sundararaman B, Townsend MJ, Chaivorapol C, Bhangale T, et al. The Ro60 autoantigen binds endogenous retroelements and regulates inflammatory gene expression. Science. 2015;350(6259):455–9. 10.1126/science.aac7442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wieland SF, Takahashi K, Boyd B, Whitten-Bauer C, Ngo N, de la Torre JC, et al. Human plasmacytoid dendritic cells sense lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus-infected cells in vitro. J Virol. 2014;88(1):752–7. 10.1128/JVI.01714-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Swiecki M, Colonna M. The multifaceted biology of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15(8):471–85. 10.1038/nri3865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sisirak V, Ganguly D, Lewis KL, Couillault C, Tanaka L, Bolland S, et al. Genetic evidence for the role of plasmacytoid dendritic cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Exp Med. 2014;211(10):1969–76. 10.1084/jem.20132522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Rowland SL, Riggs JM, Gilfillan S, Bugatti M, Vermi W, Kolbeck R, et al. Early, transient depletion of plasmacytoid dendritic cells ameliorates autoimmunity in a lupus model. J Exp Med. 2014;211(10):1977–91. 10.1084/jem.20132620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Schmitt H, Sell S, Koch J, Seefried M, Sonnewald S, Daniel C, et al. Siglec-H protects from virus-triggered severe systemic autoimmunity. J Exp Med. 2016;213(8):1627–44. 10.1084/jem.20160189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Martinez-Sobrido L, Zuniga EI, Rosario D, Garcia-Sastre A, de la Torre JC. Inhibition of the type I interferon response by the nucleoprotein of the prototypic arenavirus lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. J Virol. 2006;80(18):9192–9. 10.1128/JVI.00555-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Xing J, Ly H, Liang Y. The Z proteins of pathogenic but not nonpathogenic arenaviruses inhibit RIG-I-like receptor-dependent interferon production. J Virol. 2015;89(5):2944–55. 10.1128/JVI.03349-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Arkatkar T, Du SW, Jacobs HM, Dam EM, Hou B, Buckner JH, et al. B cell-derived IL-6 initiates spontaneous germinal center formation during systemic autoimmunity. J Exp Med. 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hwang SH, Lee H, Yamamoto M, Jones LA, Dayalan J, Hopkins R, et al. B cell TLR7 expression drives anti-RNA autoantibody production and exacerbates disease in systemic lupus erythematosus-prone mice. J Immunol. 2012;189(12):5786–96. 10.4049/jimmunol.1202195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Giltiay NV, Chappell CP, Sun X, Kolhatkar N, Teal TH, Wiedeman AE, et al. Overexpression of TLR7 promotes cell-intrinsic expansion and autoantibody production by transitional T1 B cells. J Exp Med. 2013;210(12):2773–89. 10.1084/jem.20122798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Celhar T, Hopkins R, Thornhill SI, De Magalhaes R, Hwang SH, Lee HY, et al. RNA sensing by conventional dendritic cells is central to the development of lupus nephritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(45):E6195–204. 10.1073/pnas.1507052112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Baccala R, Hoebe K, Kono DH, Beutler B, Theofilopoulos AN. TLR-dependent and TLR-independent pathways of type I interferon induction in systemic autoimmunity. Nat Med. 2007;13(5):543–51. 10.1038/nm1590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Baccala R, Gonzalez-Quintial R, Schreiber RD, Lawson BR, Kono DH, Theofilopoulos AN. Anti-IFN-alpha/beta Receptor Antibody Treatment Ameliorates Disease in Lupus-Predisposed Mice. J Immunol. 2012;189(12):5976–84. 10.4049/jimmunol.1201477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.