Abstract
Oriented smooth muscle layers in the intestine contract rhythmically due to the action of interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) that serve as pacemakers of the intestine. Disruption of ICC networks has been reported in various intestinal motility disorders, which limit the quality and expectancy of life. A significant challenge in intestinal smooth muscle engineering is the rapid loss of function in cultured ICC and smooth muscle cells (SMC). Here we demonstrate a novel approach to maintain the function of both ICC and SMC in vitro. Primary intestinal SMC mixtures cultured on feeder cells seeded electrospun poly(3-caprolactone) scaffolds exhibited rhythmic contractions with directionality for over 10 weeks in vitro. The simplicity of this system should allow for wide usage in research on intestinal motility disorders and tissue engineering, and may prove to be a versatile platform for generating other types of functional SMC in vitro.
Introduction
The intestine is responsible for digestion, nutrient and water absorption, and waste removal. An increasing number of people are suffering from various intestinal disorders which severely affect their life expectancy and quality of life1. According to the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America, there are approximately 1.6 million Americans suffering from inflammatory bowel disease in 2014, which is a 0.2 million increase from 2008.
When the intestine fails to function, current medical treatment options have significant limitations: total parenteral nutrition leads to unacceptably high morbidity and mortality rates and transplantation faces donor scarcity, organ rejection, and life-long immunosuppression2. Therefore, engineering functional intestinal tissue raises hope as an alternative therapeutic strategy for patients with intestinal failure. Previous studies have been done to regenerate the intestinal epithelium3,4 and many types of muscle, including vascular smooth muscle5,6, cardiac7–10 and skeletal muscle5,11. However, few have investigated the regeneration of intestinal smooth muscle12,13.
The aligned smooth muscle layers of the intestine move autonomously. Spontaneous electrical slow waves derived from pacemaker activity of the intestine arrange contractile patterns into phasic contractions that are the basis for peristalsis. Neural or hormonal inputs do not generate the intrinsic pacemaker activity of smooth muscles but affect the degree of coupling between pacemaker activity and contractions14. Interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) are a specialized group of cells responsible for the pacemaker activity in visceral smooth muscles, generating and actively propagating the slow waves15,16.
Isolated intestinal SMCs may generate fast Ca2+ action potentials, but not the spontaneous slow waves in smooth muscles. Conversely, isolated ICC generate spontaneous electrical rhythmicity similar to the electrical activity in intact smooth muscles17,18. The binding of stem cell factor (SCF) to the receptor tyrosine kinase Kit induces a signaling pathway in ICC, which is critical for the normal development of ICC and rhythmic activity19–23. SCF stimulation of Kit is essential for ICC maintenance22,24, and Ca2+ activated Cl− channels (Ano1) expressed on ICC were identified as the key conductance responsible for the pacemaker activity18. However, ICC comprise less than 10% of the cells within intestinal smooth muscle, and isolated ICC are difficult to maintain in cell culture. ICC tend to lose their characteristic morphologies and Kit immunoreactivity after enzymatic digestion during the cell isolation procedure. Although ICC can grow and develop networks that produce electrical rhythmicity in cell culture, those dispersed ICC undergo extensive phenotypic changes within a few days, including the apparent loss of the ion channels responsible for the slow wave activity14,18,25,26.
STO cells are embryonic fibroblasts commonly used for embryonic stem cell and primordial germ cell cultures27–29 due to its potent growth factors and cytokines production ability including SCF30 essential for ICC. Using this STO feeder cell system, we demonstrate a novel protocol where both purified ICC and isolated intestinal smooth muscle cell (ISMC) mixtures can be cultured for weeks in vitro with intact pacemaker ability and rhythmic contractions. Disruption of ICC networks and the loss of SMC maturity in intestinal muscularis have been reported in a variety of diseases resulting in intestinal motility disorders leading to pseudo-obstruction, Hirschsprung’s disease, inflammatory bowel diseases, and slow transit constipation31–34. Therefore, this system provides not only crucial progress in intestinal smooth muscle engineering, but also an in vitro platform to investigate cellular phenotypes and mechanisms associated with different intestinal disorders, to screen drugs that may alter motility, and to identify the biomarkers for early diagnosis and clinical stratification.
Moreover, this system may assist in maintaining and enhancing the maturity of SMCs from other vesicular organs, including the bladder, uterus, and vasculatures, due to their similar phenotypes35,36.
Results
ICC proliferation in vitro
To enrich the ICC population in culture, immunomagnetic sorting was performed on primary intestinal smooth muscle cell mixture (ISMC Mix, derived from C57BL/6 mouse) that were first cultured on gelatin for 3 days. The resultant MACS+ cells (MACS purified ICC population using antibody to Kit) proliferated on mitomycin-treated STO cells that expressed stem cell factor (SCF). The MACS+ cells exhibited ICC morphology and expressed Kit and Ano1 for up to two weeks in culture (Fig. 1a,b). When a 60 k per well cell seeding density was used, MACS+ cells spread on STO cells in 48-well plates and became confluent in one week. A lower seeding density was tested to achieve more cell expansion. MACS+ cells with seeding density of 15 k proliferated on STO cells and formed a confluent layer in two week (Fig. 1a,b).
Since STO cells are embryonic fibroblasts commonly used for embryonic stem cell culture, embryonic fibroblasts derived from the same mouse strain as ISMC Mix (C57BL/6), MEF, were also tested with MACS+ cell culture, with gelatin-coated wells serving as controls. STO cells supported MACS+ cell growth better than gelatin coating and MEF cells (Fig. 1c–e). Although MACS+ cells proliferated on all three conditions (Fig. 1d), cells maintained the ICC marker Kit significantly better on STO cells (3.01 ± 0.347) than on MEF (0.442 ± 0.133) or gelatin(0.395 ± 0.150) (Fig. 1c,e and Supplementary Fig. 1). Although with the same 100 k cell seeding density, more STO cells than MEF were attached because the size of STO cells (1.00 ± 0.213) is smaller than MEF (5.05 ± 3.03) (Supplementary Fig. 2a,c). STO cells expressed significantly higher kitl mRNA level at day 0 (0.24 ± 0.026 vs. 0.042 ± 0.002) and after 7 days (1.56 ± 0.121 vs. 1.09 ± 0.069) in culture than MEF cells (Supplementary Fig. 2d,e). STO cells also expressed more SCF protein at day 7 than MEF cells (Supplementary Fig. 2b). The difference in SCF expression may be responsible for the difference in ICC survival. This is further supported by varying STO cell density, which demonstrated a density-dependent proliferation of MACS+ cells30 (Fig. 1f).
Exogenously added SCF, however, was insufficient to support ICC survival. Concentrations up to 100 ng/ml of free SCF added to the culture medium failed to preserve ICC phenotype (Fig. 1g). There may be additional factors secreted by STO cells that are beneficial for ICC growth. When STO conditioned media (CM) was mixed into the culture medium (1:1 ratio) for MACS+ cell culture, CM provided a cell density dependent benefit to MACS+ cells. CM provided significant improvement in MACS +cell growth on gelatin only at a lower seeding density (0.445 ± 0.097 vs. 0.191 ± 0.047) compared to control (Fig. 1h). Providing CM to a low seeding density (0.445 ± 0.097), MAC+ cells expressed Kit to a level comparable to MACS+ cells seeded at higher density without CM (0.429 ± 0.140) (Fig. 1h).
The cultured MACS+ cells were passaged by performing an additional sorting on MACS+ cells growing on STO cells. Such passaged MACS+ cells (P-MACS+ cells) were seeded again on STO cells. Although the growth rate was slower, P-MACS+ cells also proliferated on STO cells and exhibited ICC morphology and expressed Kit and Ano1 (Fig. 2a–c).
Rhythmic pacemaker activity of cultured ICC (MACS+ and P-MACS+ cells)
To determine whether cells cocultured with STO cells were functional, we examined the intracellular Ca2+ oscillation frequency in MACS+ and P-MACS+ cells cultured on STO cells or gelatin at different density. With a higher seeding density (60 k), the MACS+ cells on STO cells exhibited a rhythmic Ca2+ oscillation frequency that was significantly higher (0.241 ± 0.048 Hz vs. 0.078 ± 0.021 Hz) than MACS+ cells cultured on gelatin (Fig. 2d). STO cells also supported P-MACS+ cells seeded at a higher density, and these cells exhibited a rhythmic Ca2+ oscillation frequency similar (0.249 ± 0.037 Hz vs. 0.241 ± 0.048 Hz) to MACS+ cells before passaging (Fig. 2e). Moreover, it’s easier to maintain and restore the functionality of MACS+ cells seeded at a higher density. With a lower seeding density (15 k), it was still possible to recover the functionality of MACS+ cells, but it took a longer culture time (day14 vs. day7) and resulted in slightly slower frequency (0.191 ± 0.029 Hz vs. 0.241 ± 0.048 Hz) than a higher seeding density (60 k) (Fig. 2e). The number of functional cells in P-MACS+ culture was about half of that in MACS+ culture due to a slower growth rate (Fig. 2a–c). A higher seeding density and lower passage number were beneficial for cells to form a network sooner, which lead to an earlier establishment of coordinated pacemaker activity in culture (Fig. 2e). Moreover, MACS+ cells cultured on STO cells demonstrated stable, periodic Ca2+ oscillation over time (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Video 1) and its average frequency (0.241 ± 0.048 Hz) was in the range of previous studies18,21,37–39. Our results suggest that the STO culture system facilitates proliferation of not only MACS+ cells but also P-MACS+ cells over time while preserving their pacemaker activities.
Application of MACS+ cells cultured on STO cells
ICC residing in the intestinal smooth muscle tend to align along the smooth muscle orientation40–43 (Supplementary Fig. 3a). In order to induce the proper alignment, MACS+ cells were cultured on STO-seeded electrospun poly(3-caprolactone) (ePCL) scaffolds40 (Supplementary Fig. 3b). MACS+ cells proliferated and aligned along the ePCL fiber orientation after 2 weeks (Fig. 3a). Coherency analysis of Kit expression confirmed that MACS+ cells cultured on ePCL scaffolds (aligned) were statistically more aligned (0.445 ± 0.021 vs. 0.087 ± 0.022) than those cultured on glass (random orientation) controls (Fig. 3b,c). Further, we demonstrated that MACS+ cells (GFP+) survived for at least a week in vivo, following colonoscopic injection into the rectal submucosa of C57BL/6 mice. Injected MACS+ cells, identified by GFP, co-localized with Ano1 expressed by ICC but not with α-SMA (Fig. 3d,e). Moreover, MACS+ cells were distributed around the injection site of the submucosa as indicated by carbon ink and demonstrated alignment along the smooth muscle layer, accompanied by native ICC and SMCs (Fig. 3d,e). Minimal inflammation was noted at the site of cell injection. These results demonstrate that the in vitro expanded ICC not only can be align by using scaffolds but also can survive in vivo through colonoscopic injections.
ISMC Mix and MOVAS cells maintenance on STO cells
To test whether our approach of culturing MACS+ cells with spontaneous Ca2+ oscillation could support periodic contractions of SMCs, ISMC Mix was cultured on STO cells for three weeks. At day 7, ISMC Mix cultured on STO cells in F12 medium expressed the highest level of ICC markers (Kit and Ano1 co-localization), SMCs marker (MHC) and neuronal marker (β-tubulin), followed by ISMC Mix cultured on STO cells in FBS medium and ISMC Mix cultured on gelatin in FBS medium (Fig. 4a). Comparable to the trends observed in immunostaining, ISMC Mix on STO cells cultured in F12 medium showed the greatest expression of Kit, Myh11, Tubb3, Kitl, and Acta2 up to three weeks, with the exception that cells cultured on STO cells in FBS medium had a slightly higher expression of Kitl at weeks two and three (Fig. 4b). Cells cultured on STO cells had higher expression of Kit and Kitl (STO-FBS vs. Ge-FBS) while F12 medium induced higher expression of Myh11, Tubb3, and Acta2 (STO-F12 vs. STO-FBS) (Fig. 4b). Cultures with STO cells and F12 medium demonstrated the greatest expression of Myh11 over time (Fig. 4b). ISMC Mix cultured on gelatin had a higher proliferation but lower expression of other markers compared to ISMC Mix cultured on STO cells with FBS or F12 medium (Fig. 4b). We also cultured a vascular aortic smooth muscle cell line (MOVAS cells) under the same conditions as ISMC Mix to study the effects of our system on non-intestinal SMCs. MOVAS cells followed a similar trend as ISMC Mix; they were enriched in mature SMC marker, Myh11, on day 7, with the best condition being F12 medium on STO cells (9.75 ± 0.969) and the worst being on gelatin (5.51 ± 0.735) (Fig. 4d). This finding suggests that the beneficial effects of our system on SMCs are not limited to ISMC Mix cells.
As predicted from the immunostaining and mRNA expression, ISMC Mix cultured on STO cells demonstrated periodic contractions (Fig. 4c) while cells cultured on gelatin in FBS medium did not contract (not shown). STO cells with F12 medium enabled ISMC Mix to retain faster frequency over a longer period of time (0.252 ± 0.050 vs. 0.191 ± 0.054 at day7; 0.246 ± 0.046 vs. 0.112 ± 0.082 at day21) compared to ISMC Mix cultured on STO cells in FBS medium (Fig. 4c). STO cells were shown to be effective in maintaining not only functional ICC but also functional ISMC. Overall, these results suggest that STO cells with F12 medium is the optimal condition to culture ISMC Mix with periodic contractions (Supplementary Videos 2 and 3).
Engineering functional intestinal smooth muscle
To create an implantable tissue construct for regenerative medicine, we engineered intestinal smooth muscle with proper alignment and functionality by culturing ISMC Mix on STO-seeded ePCL in F12 medium. ISMC Mix cultured on STO-seeded ePCL demonstrated unceasing, rhythmic contraction over 10 weeks in vitro (Fig. 5f). After 10 weeks of culture, the constructs were examined with immunostaining and qPCR, demonstrating expression of ICC, SMC and neuronal markers, and more than 3 fold cell growth with gfp DNA (Fig. 5a,b). Although STO cells played essential roles in supporting ISMC Mix culture, the effect of STO cells likely declined over time due to its mitomycin C treatment. When STO cells were seeded alone, the reduction in the cell number and viability were observed over time (Supplementary Fig. 4).
To quantify the intensity and directionality of the periodic contractions generated by ISMC Mix on ePCL scaffolds, the dimensions of the most contracted scaffold was compared to those in the most relaxed scaffold (normalized to 1). The change in area of the scaffold (0.943 ± 0.004 vs. 1.00 ± 0.005) (Fig. 5d) was mainly due to a significant change in the length of the scaffold along the direction of the fibers, labelled as the height of the ePCL scaffold (0.955 ± 0.010 vs. 1.00 ± 0.005) (Fig. 5e). Moreover, the cells cultured on ePCL scaffolds showed surface alignment along the direction of the fibers in the scaffold (Fig. 5a,c). The alignment of ISMC Mix inside the ePCL scaffolds was also quantified as we had previously described40. Briefly, ePCL scaffolds were cut in two orthogonal planes to expose cross section parallel or perpendicular to ePCL’s aligned fibers. Coherency analysis (MHC, GFP and β-tubulin) and circularity analysis (DAPI) were used to compare the alignment in the two cross sections, where coherency factor ranges from 0 (perfect random) to 1 (perfect alignment) indicating cell alignment while circularity factor ranges from 0 (most elongated shape) to 1 (perfect circle) indicating elongation of nuclei due to cell alignment. Our results showed that the ISMC Mix cells infiltrated inside the ePCL and arranged along the ePCL’s aligned fibers (Supplementary Fig. 5). Culturing ISMC Mix on STO-seeded ePCL produced intestinal smooth muscle constructs with proper alignment and spontaneous rhythmic contractions (Supplementary Video 4).
ICC is essential for rhythmic contraction of ISMC Mix
To confirm the role of ICC in ISMC Mix in producing spontaneous, rhythmic contractions, MACS+ cells were separated from ISMC Mix to create a MACS− cells population that contains few ICC. The MACS− cells were cultured on STO cells for 3 weeks in vitro, and its motility, gene and protein expression were analyzed. The comparison between passaged ISMC Mix (MACS0) and MACS− cells showed that the ICC population in MACS0 is essential for spontaneous rhythmic contractions (Fig. 6a–c). MACS− cells, without an ICC population (Kit 1.79 ± 0.445 vs. 0.013 ± 0.005), failed to exhibit rhythmic contractions (0.246 ± 0.006 Hz vs. 0.064 ± 0.003 Hz at week3) even though SMCs (Myh11 0.575 ± 0.197 vs. 1.10 ± 0.245) and neuronal cells (Tubb3 2.32 ± 0.586 vs. 4.01 ± 0.539) were present (Fig. 6a–c, MACS0 vs. MACS−). We also performed a rescue experiment where MACS+ cells were added back to MACS− cells 5 days after they were cultured on STO cells (MACS−/+). The added MACS+ cells restored the rhythmic contractions of the MACS− cells cultured on STO cells in 5 weeks (0.230 ± 0.017 Hz vs. 0.056 ± 0.021; Kit 2.15 ± 0.297 vs. 0.032 ± 0.010; Myh11 0.119 ± 0.019 vs. 0.179 ± 0.127; Tubb3 1.46 ± 0.378 vs. 1.97 ± 1.15) (Fig. 6d–f, MACS−/+ vs. MACS−). This experiment confirms that ICC play an essential role in producing the spontaneous rhythmic contractions of cultured ISMC.
Discussion
This study demonstrates that STO cells can support ICC in culture and maintains the spontaneous intracellular Ca2+ oscillation frequency within the previously published range16,18,26,37–39,44–46. These functional ICC pace the rhythmic contractions of SMC. It is also necessary for SMC to retain its maturity and express MHC to contract12,13 upon receiving pacemaker signals from functional ICC. The loss of maturity and functionality of either ICC or SMC in culture is a major challenge for intestinal smooth muscle engineering12,13,47. Our system described here is an approach to achieving this goal by maintaining the functionality of both ICC and SMC, as well as neuronal cells cultured in vitro.
This system provides an easily accessible in vitro model to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying a functional smooth muscle. The combination of STO cells and F12 medium works well to produce the in vitro culture of the intestinal smooth muscle. While it is likely that STO cells provide signals including preferable forms of SCF48,49 and other factors30 important for ICC to survive and function, the exact mechanisms that underlie these observations will need to be investigated further. The beneficial effects provided by STO cells are important during the initial phase of the smooth muscle cell culture. It is likely that other cell types within ISMC Mix eventually take over the function of STO cells due to the mitomycin C treatment.
This novel culture method is likely to have broad applications. We demonstrated that both MACS+ cells and ISMC Mix were able to attach and align along ePCL scaffolds and that MACS+ cells cultured using our system survived in vivo after colonoscopic injections. Specifically, colonoscopic injections of ICC may help motility disorders including diabetic gastroparesis, pseudo-obstruction and Hirschsprung’s disease due to frequent defects in ICC networks reported in those disorders33,34. The culture method could also be applied to cells from other visceral organs35, and the cultured cells could be seeded on other biomaterials, used in other in vivo studies, and incorporated into microfluidic systems.
Finally, this culture system is simple and reproducible for generating a functional smooth muscle layer in vitro. Our STO cell system only requires standard culture medium without specialized additives. STO cells are readily available at a low cost from commercial vendors. We believe that the STO cell system has the potential to become a common method to create functional smooth muscle in vitro. Our data demonstrate that the system sustains the maturity of the vascular smooth muscle cells, so it may similarly serve as the platform for both basic and applied research in various other types of smooth muscle functionalities and disorders.
Methods
Electrospinning
11% (w/w) solution of PCL (Durect Lactel, Birmingham, AL) was made in hexafluoro-2-propanol (Acros Organics, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The solution was kept on a shaker overnight to obtain a homogenous polymer solution. The mandrel was wrapped with aluminum foil to ease the removal of the scaffold. The PCL solution was transferred to a plastic syringe fitted with an 18-gauge needle, and secured onto a syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA). The solution was infused at 2.5 ml/h onto a rotating mandrel collector with an outer diameter of 32 mm that was positioned 12–15 cm away from the needle tip. The electrical potential difference between the needle (i.e., polymer solution) and the grounded mandrel collector was produced by a high voltage power supply (Glassman High Voltage, High Bridge, NJ). Scaffolds comprised of aligned ePCL fibers were fabricated using a mandrel rotational speed of 3450 rpm and an applied voltage of 15 kV. Less-aligned, “random” ePCL fibers were produced using a mandrel rotational speed of 1725 rpm and applied voltage of 25 kV. After 0.5 ml of polymer solution had been dispensed from the syringe onto the rotating mandrel, the ePCL was carefully removed from the aluminum foil. Scaffolds were air-dried before laser cutting.
Laser cutting
ePCL scaffolds were constructed as fiber sheets with dimensions approximately 10 × 2.5 cm and thickness of 100–150 µm, based on the mandrel used. These fiber sheets were cut into rectangular 8 × 6.5 mm scaffolds using the VERSA LASER CUTTER 2.3 (Universal Laser Systems, Scottsdale, AZ) with vector mode, 5% power, 100x speed, and 1000 pulses/inch. Scaffolds were obtained by setting the longer edge of the rectangle to be along the fiber direction. The scaffolds were cleaned with air plasma (Harrick Plasma, Ithaca, NY) at 500 mTorr, high power for 1 min and subsequently sterilized with strong UV (Dymax) for 1 min. The scaffolds were washed once with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) before and after coating with gelatin solution (attachment factor solution (AF); Invitrogen) at 37 °C for at least 30 min. (Note: To improve the cell seeding onto ePCL scaffolds, PDMS molds with a well size the same as an ePCL scaffold were manufactured. This will allow ePCL scaffold to fit perfectly and stay at bottom of the PDMS well so that seeded cells attached effectively on the ePCL scaffold with minimal spillage to the bottom of the well).
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
The surface morphology of ePCL scaffolds with aligned or random fibers was assessed using a Nova NanoSEM 230 (FEI, Hillsboro, Oregon). The scaffolds without conductive coating were mounted on the sticky conductive carbon tape (Ted Pella, Redding, California) on the top of aluminum stubs (Ted Pella, Redding, California) and examined under SEM with an accelerating voltage of 10 kV at low vacuum mode.
Ethics statement
Animal usage complied with regulations set by the University of California, Los Angeles, Chancellor’s Animal Research Committee and was approved as animal protocol number 2005-169. All efforts were made to minimize pain and suffering. Two mice strains were used for these experiments: C57BL/6-Tg(Actb-EGFP)1Osb/J (“GFP”) (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) and wild type C57BL/6 (Charles River, Wilmington, MA).
Feeder cells preparation
Embryonic fibroblasts, STO (SIM, Sandos Inbred Mouse) and MEF (C57BL/6) (both from ATCC) were expanded in STO medium (low glucose DMEM with GlutaMAXTM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1x ABAM (All Invitrogen)) and suspended in STO medium with 10% DMSO for cryopreservation (~106 cells/ml, 1 ml/vial). ~106 feeder cells were thawed and cultured in gelatin coated T25 flasks with STO medium for a few days until confluency and treated with mitomycin C (Sigma). ~100 k cells were seeded onto gelatin-coated substrates such as 48-well plate (Coring Costar, Fisher Scientific), eight-chamber slide (Nunc™ Lab-Tek™ II; Thermo Scientific) and ePCL scaffold, and cultured at 37 °C with STO medium in a 10% CO2 incubator. Prepared feeder cells were used within 3 days.
Primary intestinal smooth muscle cell mixture (ISMC Mix) isolation and culture
ISMC Mix were isolated from 7 to 10-day-old C57BL/6 neonates using previously described methods12,38,40,50. The intestines were removed via a midline incision, and smooth muscle strips, containing both longitudinal and circular muscle layers, were gently teased from the intestines using fine forceps and placed in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) without calcium and magnesium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with 1x antibiotic-antimycotic (ABAM) (Invitrogen) on ice. Then the smooth muscle strips were minced and incubated at 37 °C for 30~40 min in an enzyme solution containing collagenase (1.3 mg/ml Worthington Type II; Worthington Biochemical, Freehold, NJ), bovine serum albumin (BSA) (2 mg/ml), trypsin inhibitor (2 mg/ml), ATP (0.27 mg/ml) (all from Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and 10% HBSS with calcium and magnesium (Invitrogen) in HBSS without calcium and magnesium containing 1x ABAM. The tissue was washed twice with vigorous pipetting with 10% FBS in HBSS without calcium and magnesium containing 1x ABAM. As a preparation for immunomagnetic sorting (MACS), the resulting ISMC Mix was cultured in gelatin coated T25 flasks (ISMC Mix from ~4 pups in one T25 flask) for 3 days. Alternatively, 100 k ISMC Mix were seeded onto substrates (48 well plate, eight-chamber slide, ePCL scaffold) with STO cells or gelatin coating. ISMC Mix were cultured at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator in FBS medium (Knockout™ D-MEM supplemented with 15% ECS-qualified FBS, 0.1 mM MEM Non-Essential Amino Acids solution, 2 mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1x ABAM, and 10 mM HEPES (Invitrogen)). All ISMC Mix were cultured in FBS medium for the first 4 days followed by FBS or F12 medium (Advanced DMEM/F-12 supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 1x ABAM, and 10 mM HEPES (Invitrogen)). For conditioned medium (CM) preparation, STO medium was replaced with FBS medium after the STO cells formed a confluent monolayer and treated with mitomycin C. The FBS medium was collected after 4~5 days of incubation, passed through a 0.2 μm pore size filter (Pall Corporation, Port Washington, NY), and mixed with fresh FBS medium (1:1 ratio) as CM. The medium was changed every 2~3 days.
MOVAS cell culture
MOVAS cells (C57BL/6) (ATCC) were expanded in STO medium and suspended in STO medium with 10% DMSO for cryopreservation (~106 cells/ml, 1 ml/vial). ~106 feeder cells were thawed and cultured in gelatin coated T25 flasks with STO medium for a few days until confluency. ~100 k cells were seeded onto 48-well plate (Coring Costar, Fisher Scientific) with STO cells or gelatin coating in triplicates. All MOVAS cells were cultured in FBS medium for the first 4 days followed by FBS or F12 medium.
Enrichment of ICC by immunomagnetic sorting (MACS)
After 3 days in culture, ISMC Mix were washed in PBS and incubated with 0.05% trypsin-EDTA (Invitrogen) at 37C for ~2 min The ICC marker, Kit, the epitope recognized by ACK2, is easily altered or masked during the enzymatic digestion process. Therefore, it is important to avoid over-digestion. The reaction was stopped by adding FBS medium. The dissociated cells were washed once with sorting buffer (1% BSA (Fisher Scientific) and 2 mM EDTA (Sigma) in PBS; ~pH7.2) and passed through a 100 µm cell strainer (Fisher Scientific). After centrifuging the cell suspension at 1000 rpm for 5 min, supernatant was aspirated completely. The cell pellet was re-suspended in sorting buffer and then well-mixed with the CD117 MicroBeads solution (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany; 1:5 in sorting buffer). The cell suspension was incubated for 15 minutes at 4 °C. For cells from four pups, 160 µL of sorting buffer and 40 µL of CD117 MicroBeads solution were used. Half the volume was used for cells isolated from two pups. The cell suspension was mixed with pipetting every 5 min. After being washed twice with the sorting buffer, the labeled cells were re-suspended in sorting buffer and 0.5 ml of the cell suspension was passed through pre-wetted MS magnetic columns placed in a strong magnet (MiniMACS; Miltenyi Biotec) at a time. Cells from four pups were re-suspended in 4 ml sorting buffer and passed through two MS columns, 2 ml per each. After passing all of the cell suspension, MS columns were washed once with 1 ml of sorting buffer. Unlabeled cells were collected as flow-through (MACS− cells), while labeled cells retained in the columns were flushed out with 1 ml of sorting buffer after removing the column from the magnet (MACS+ cells). MACS+ cells were seeded onto gelatin or feeder cells and cultured at 37 °C, 10% CO2 incubator in FBS medium.
For P-MACS culture, the resultant MACS+ cells from 4 pups were all cultured on a STO-seeded well of a 6-well plate for 7 days, passaged with MACS, and subsequently cultured on STO cells in FBS medium. The medium was changed every 2~3 days.
For MACS0, MACS− and MACS−/+ culture, CD117 MicroBeads labeled cells without passing through the MS magnetic column (MACS0) and MACS− cells were cultured on STO cells in FBS medium for 4 days followed by F12 medium. We also added MACS+ cells back to MACS− cell culture 5 days after they were cultured on STO cells in order to recover its spontaneous contractility (MACS−/+). The MACS−/+ cells were cultured in FBS medium for 7 days, followed by F12 medium (2 days after adding the MACS+ cells onto MACS− cells). The medium was changed every 2~3 days.
Measurement of pacemaker activity in purified ICC (MACS+ cells)
To monitor oscillations in intracellular Ca2+ concentration, cultured ICC (MACS+ cells) were incubated with 1 part of 2X Fluo-4 Direct™ calcium reagent loading solution without probenecid (Invitrogen) and 1 part of FBS medium at 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for 0.5~1 hour. Incubating for too short of a time will result in a weak signal while too long will result in an increased number of floating dead cells. Fluorescent images (680 × 512 pixels) were acquired with an Olympus IX71 microscope using cellSens software (Olympus, Center Valley, PA) (acquisition rate: 4.8~7.7 Hz; excitation wavelength: 494 nm; emission wavelength: 516 nm), and analyzed using custom MATLAB programs12 (region of interest analysis, Supplementary Fig. 6; fast-forward and gray scale normalization, Supplementary Fig. 7). In order to keep the temperature close to 37 °C51,52, cells were limited to 5 min at room temperature for image acquisition and were returned to the incubator before repeating the process.
Colonoscopic injection of MACS+ cells cultured on STO cells
Eight to 12 week old male and female C57BL/6 J mice (n = 3) were placed on water only diet overnight. Anesthesia was induced with 3% isoflurane then decreased to 1% for maintenance. Colonoscopy was performed by introducing a lubricated 1.9 mm endoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) into the mouse rectum, as previously described53. GFP + MACS+ cells were cultured on STO cells for 4 days and MACS purified prior to the colonoscopic injection. The resulting P-MACS+ cells were re-suspended in low glucose DMEM with GlutaMAXTM (Invitrogen) to a concentration of 5 × 105 cells/ml and mixed with 1.5% permanent carbon ink (Spot; GI Supply, Camp Hill, PA) for later identification of the injection sites. Using a 30 gauge custom-made needle fitted with pulled and beveled capillary tubing53, 100 µL of the cell suspension was injected into the submucosa of the ventral rectum (n = 12 total). Mice were monitored for appropriate recovery from anesthesia and placed back in standard laboratory mouse cages with full access to water and chow. All mice were sacrificed 7 days after the cell injection procedure and colon specimens were isolated.
Histology and immunofluorescence staining
Samples, including cell-seeded ePCL and P-MACS+ injected intestine, were formalin-fixed and processed for paraffin embedding. Serial 5 µm sections were cut and adhered to glass slides. Unstained slides were prepared for immunofluorescence staining. Slides were de-waxed with xylene and rehydrated with serial dilutions of ethanol. Next, slides were incubated in a citric buffer (Biogenex, San Ramon, CA) for 15 min at 95–100 °C and allowed to cool for 15 minutes in an over flowing water bath. In vitro cultures and native smooth muscle strips were fixed without histologic processing. For Kit and Ano1 staining, samples were fixed with acetone for 30 min at 4 °C. For all the other staining, samples were fixed with 10% formalin for 30 min at room temperature. After three washes with PBS, samples were treated with a blocking buffer containing 5% normal goat serum (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA), 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma) in PBS for 1 hour at 4 °C. Samples were then incubated with the following primary antibodies: Kit (1:500; eBioscience: 16-1172-82), Ano1 (1:500; Abcam: ab53212), MHC (1:100; Abcam: ab53219), β-tubulin (1:500; Abcam: ab78078), GFP (1:500; Aves: GFP-1020), and SCF (1:500; ab64677) diluted in staining buffer containing 5% normal goat serum in PBS overnight at 4 °C. After two washes in PBS, samples were incubated in the dark with their corresponding Alexa Fluor® secondary antibodies (1:500; Invitrogen) and Alexa Fluor® 594 Palloidin (1:100; Invitrogen) diluted in staining buffer for 2~3 hours at room temperature. After three washes with PBS, Prolong Gold with DAPI (Invitrogen) was applied to each section and the slides were covered with glass coverslips. The slides were allowed to cure at 4 °C before storing at −80 °C. Fluorescent images were acquired with an Olympus IX71 microscope with cellSens software (Olympus, Center Valley, PA) or confocal laser microscopy (TCS SP2 AOBS, TCS SP2 MP AOBS; Leica).
DNA/RNA extraction and qPCR
DNA and RNA were extracted and purified from in vitro cultures using the DNeasy and RNeasy kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), respectively following the manufacture’s protocol. RNA samples were cleaned with RNase-Free DNase set (Qiagen) during the procedure. The qPCR reactions were prepared using a PCR master mix and the Quantitect Probe RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen) and performed on an ABI 7500 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The primers and probe for gfp-DNA and Kit-RNA were custom- designed and purchased from Eurofins MWG Operon, (Huntsville, AL): gfp-fw, 5′-ACTACAACAGCCACAACGTCTATATCA-3′; gfp-rev, 5′-GGCGGATCTTGAAGTTCACC-3′; gfp-pb, and 5′-[6-FAM]CCGACAAGCAGAAGAACGGCATCA[TAMRA-Q]-3′; Kit-fw, 5′-CCGTGAACTCCATGTGGCTAAAGA; Kit-rev, 5′-GGTGCCAGCTATTGTGCTTTACCT-3′; Kit-pb, 5′-[6-FAM]TGAACCCTCAGCCTCAGCACATAGC[TAMRA-Q]-3′. All the other primer/probe mixtures were purchased from Applied Biosystems: Myh11 (Mm00443013_m1), Tubb3 (Mm00727586_s1), Kitl (Mm00442972_m1), Acta2 (Mm01546133_m1), Ano1 (Mm00724407_m1) and Gapdh (Mm99999915_g1). DNA qPCR results were analyzed using a standard prepared with known number cells from ISMC Mix. RNA qPCR results were analyzed using Gapdh as the housekeeping gene and de-epithelialized intestine from 7 to 10-day-old C57BL/6 neonates as reference. For MOVAS cells, 100 k cells from day 0 were used as reference.
MTS assay
MTS assay was conducted to test the viability of mitomycin C treated STO cells over time. 100 k mitomycin C treated STO cells were seeded on to 48-well plate in STO medium overnight, followed by the same series of medium as the preparation for ISMC Mix feeder layer. At each time point, wells with cells and without cells (control) were incubated with a mixture of CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Reagent (Promega) in appropriate medium (1:5 volume ratio) at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator for an hour. The absorbance was measured at 490 nm (SynergyTM HT; BioTek). Data were normalized to controls.
Data Analysis
The frequency of spontaneous contractions of the cells was analyzed manually from recorded videos (680 × 512 pixels; acquisition rate: 5.0 Hz) acquired with an Olympus IX71 microscope using cellSens software (Olympus, Center Valley, PA). The area, height and width of the most contracted ePCL scaffolds were normalized to that of the most relaxed ePCL scaffolds with ImageJ using images extracted from a representative video and manually outlined ePCL scaffolds. In order to compare the size of feeder cells, area of MEF was normalized to that of STO cells with ImageJ. For the cell alignment quantification, ImageJ was used to conduct circularity analysis (DAPI) and the plugin OrientationJ was used to conduct coherency analysis (Kit, MHC, GFP and β-tubulin).
Statistical analysis
One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test or two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test was used depending on the number of simultaneous conditions to analyze. Levels of significance were set at ***P < 0.0001, **P < 0.01, and *P < 0.05. Data were expressed as the mean ± the standard deviation (s.d.). n indicates the number of independent experiments (different primary cell isolations from different animals) except for the following cases: Fig. 2d,e, n = number of cell cultures (from 3 different independent experiments); Fig. 3c, n = number of images (from one independent experiment); Fig. 4c, n = number of videos (from two independent experiments); Fig. 5d,e, n = number of images (extracted from a representative video).
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
Confocal laser scanning microscopy was performed at the CNSI Advanced Light Microscopy/Spectroscopy Shared Resource Facility at UCLA. We thank Dr. Matthew Schibler for his generous help with the facility. We also thank UCLA Translational Pathology Core Lab for histologic processing. This work was funded by R01 DK083119 from the National Institutes of Health.
Author Contributions
M.K. designed the study, performed all experiments except colonoscopic injection and analyses, and wrote the manuscript. H.A.K. performed colonoscopic injection. J.C.Y.D. and N.L. edited the manuscript. Q.W. performed SEM and assisted with Matlab. K.W. provided Matlab code for multi-ROI analysis. J.C.Y.D. and B.M.W. provided guidance on experimental design.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-31992-4.
References
- 1.Bines JE. Intestinal failure: A new era in clinical management. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2009;24:S86–S92. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06077.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Donohoe CL, Reynolds JV. Short bowel syndrome. Surgeon. 2010;8:270–9. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2010.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sato T, et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt–villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature. 2009;459:262–265. doi: 10.1038/nature07935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sala FG, Kunisaki SM, Ochoa ER, Vacanti J, Grikscheit TC. Tissue-Engineered Small Intestine and Stomach Form from Autologous Tissue in a Preclinical Large Animal Model. J. Surg. Res. 2009;156:205–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jain RK, Au P, Tam J, Duda DG, Fukumura D. Engineering vascularized tissue. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005;23:821–823. doi: 10.1038/nbt0705-821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.L’Heureux N, et al. Human tissue-engineered blood vessels for adult arterial revascularization. Nat. Med. 2006;12:361–365. doi: 10.1038/nm1364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ott HC, et al. Perfusion-decellularized matrix: using nature’s platform to engineer a bioartificial heart. Nat. Med. 2008;14:213–221. doi: 10.1038/nm1684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Engelmayr GC, et al. Accordion-like honeycombs for tissue engineering of cardiac anisotropy. Nat. Mater. 2008;7:1003–1010. doi: 10.1038/nmat2316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Radisic M, Marsano A, Maidhof R, Wang Y, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Cardiac tissue engineering using perfusion bioreactor systems. Nat. Protoc. 2008;3:719–38. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Laflamme MA, Murry CE. Regenerating the heart. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005;23:845–856. doi: 10.1038/nbt1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Camargo FD, Green R, Capetenaki Y, Jackson KA, Goodell MA. Single hematopoietic stem cells generate skeletal muscle through myeloid intermediates. Nat. Med. 2003;9:1520–1527. doi: 10.1038/nm963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Walthers CM, Lee M, Wu BM, Dunn JCY. Smooth muscle strips for intestinal tissue engineering. PLoS One. 2014;9:e114850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee M, Wu BM, Stelzner M, Reichardt HM, Dunn JCY. Intestinal smooth muscle cell maintenance by basic fibroblast growth factor. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2008;14:1395–402. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sanders KM, Koh SD, Ro S, Ward SM. Regulation of gastrointestinal motility–insights from smooth muscle biology. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012;9:633–45. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sanders K. A case for interstitial cells of Cajal as pacemakers and mediators of neurotransmission in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:492–515. doi: 10.1053/gast.1996.v111.pm8690216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sanders KM, Koh SD, Ward SM. Interstitial cells of cajal as pacemakers in the gastrointestinal tract. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2006;68:307–43. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.68.040504.094718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Langton P, Ward SM, Carl A, Norell MA, Sanders KM. Spontaneous electrical activity of interstitial cells of Cajal isolated from canine proximal colon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1989;86:7280–7284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.18.7280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhu MH, et al. A Ca(2+)-activated Cl(−) conductance in interstitial cells of Cajal linked to slow wave currents and pacemaker activity. J. Physiol. 2009;587:4905–18. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.176206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Huizinga, J. D. et al. W/kit gene required for interstitial cells of Cajal and for intestinal pacemaker activity. Nature 347–349 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 20.Klüppel M, Huizinga JD, Malysz J, Bernstein A. Developmental origin and Kit-dependent development of the interstitial cells of cajal in the mammalian small intestine. Dev. Dyn. 1998;211:60–71. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199801)211:1<60::AID-AJA6>3.0.CO;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liu LW, Thuneberg L, Huizinga JD. Development of pacemaker activity and interstitial cells of Cajal in the neonatal mouse small intestine. Dev. Dyn. 1998;213:271–82. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199811)213:3<271::AID-AJA4>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Maeda H, Yamagata A, Nishikawa S, Yoshinaga K. Requirement of c-kit for development of intestinal pacemaker system. Development. 1992;116:369–375. doi: 10.1242/dev.116.2.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wu JJ, Rothman TP, Gershon MD. Development of the interstitial cell of Cajal: origin, kit dependence and neuronal and nonneuronal sources of kit ligand. J. Neurosci. Res. 2000;59:384–401. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(20000201)59:3<384::AID-JNR13>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Torihashi S, et al. Blockade of kit signaling induces transdifferentiation of interstitial cells of Cajal to a smooth muscle phenotype. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:140–148. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70560-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thomson L, et al. Interstitial cells of Cajal generate a rhythmic pacemaker current. Nat. Med. 1998;4:848–851. doi: 10.1038/nm0798-848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Koh SD, Sanders KM, Ward SM. Spontaneous electrical rhythmicity in cultured interstitial cells of Cajal from the murine small intestine. J. Physiol. 1998;513:203–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.203by.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Boheler KR. Differentiation of Pluripotent Embryonic Stem Cells Into Cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 2002;91:189–201. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000027865.61704.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Park Y-G, et al. Effects of Feeder Cell Types on Culture of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell In Vitro. Dev. Reprod. 2015;19:119–26. doi: 10.12717/DR.2015.19.3.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Piedrahita JA. Primordial Germ Cells In Vitro. Cloning. 2000;2:197–205. doi: 10.1089/152045500454753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Talbot NC, Sparks WO, Powell AM, Kahl S, Caperna TJ. Quantitative and semiquantitative immunoassay of growth factors and cytokines in the conditioned medium of STO and CF-1 mouse feeder cells. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 2012;48:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s11626-011-9467-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rumessen RIJ. Interstitial Cells of Cajal in Human Gut and Gastrointestinal Disease. Microsc. Res. Tech. 1999;47:344–360. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19991201)47:5<344::AID-JEMT6>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sanders KM, Ordög T, Ward SM. Physiology and pathophysiology of the interstitial cells of Cajal: from bench to bedside. IV. Genetic and animal models of GI motility disorders caused by loss of interstitial cells of Cajal. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2002;282:G747–56. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00362.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Burns AJ. Disorders of interstitial cells of Cajal. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2007;45(Suppl 2):S103–6. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31812e65e0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Farrugia G. Interstitial cells of Cajal in health and disease. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2008;20:54–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01109.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Drumm BT, Koh SD, Andersson K-E, Ward SM. Calcium signalling in Cajal-like interstitial cells of the lower urinary tract. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2014;11:555–64. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Beamish JA, He P, Kottke-Marchant K, Marchant RE. Molecular Regulation of Contractile Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotype: Implications for Vascular Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2010;16:467–491. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ward, S. M. et al. Rapid Report Pacemaking in interstitial cells of Cajal depends upon calcium handling by endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. 355–361 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 38.Ordög T, Redelman D, Horowitz NN, Sanders KM. Immunomagnetic enrichment of interstitial cells of Cajal. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2004;286:G351–60. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00281.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lee JCF, et al. Generation of slow waves in membrane potential is an intrinsic property of interstitial cells of Cajal Generation of slow waves in membrane potential is an intrinsic property of interstitial cells of Cajal. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 1999;277:G409–23. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1999.277.2.G409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kobayashi M, Lei NY, Wang Q, Wu BM, Dunn JCY. Orthogonally oriented scaffolds with aligned fibers for engineering intestinal smooth muscle. Biomaterials. 2015;61:75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gomez-Pinilla PJ, et al. Ano1 is a selective marker of interstitial cells of Cajal in the human and mouse gastrointestinal tract. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2009;296:G1370–81. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00074.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chen, Y. et al. Visualization of the interstitial cells of cajal (ICC) network in mice. J. Vis. Exp. 3–7 10.3791/2802 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 43.Komuro T. Structure and organization of interstitial cells of Cajal in the gastrointestinal tract. J. Physiol. 2006;576:653–8. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.116624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Torihashi S, Fujimoto T, Trost C, Nakayama S. Calcium oscillation linked to pacemaking of interstitial cells of Cajal: requirement of calcium influx and localization of TRP4 in caveolae. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:19191–7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201728200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ishikawa T, et al. Characterization of in vitro gutlike organ formed from mouse embryonic stem cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2004;286:C1344–52. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00392.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lee J, et al. Neurotensin modulates pacemaker activity in interstitial cells of Cajal from the mouse small intestine. Mol. Cells. 2012;33:509–16. doi: 10.1007/s10059-012-2290-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nair DG, et al. Proliferation modulates intestinal smooth muscle phenotype in vitro and in colitis in vivo. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2011;300:G903–13. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00528.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liang J, et al. The C-kit receptor-mediated signal transduction and tumor-related diseases. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2013;9:435–43. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.6087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Roskoski R. Signaling by Kit protein-tyrosine kinase–the stem cell factor receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;337:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Geisbauer CL, Chapin JC, Wu BM, Dunn JCY. Transplantation of Enteric Cells Expressing p75 in the Rodent Stomach. J. Surg. Res. 2012;174:257–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zeng S, Li B, Zeng S, Chen S. Simulation of spontaneous Ca2+ oscillations in astrocytes mediated by voltage-gated calcium channels. Biophys. J. 2009;97:2429–37. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.08.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Daniel EE, Boddy G, Bong A, Cho W. A new model of pacing in the mouse intestine. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2004;286:G253–62. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00221.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Khalil, H. A. et al. Mouse model of endoscopically ablated enteric nervous system. J. Surg. Res, 10.1016/j.jss.2015.07.034 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.