Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2018 Jul 20;102(18):7821–7835. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9214-z

The influence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in plant tolerance to abiotic stress: a survival strategy

Matthew Chekwube Enebe 1, Olubukola Oluranti Babalola 1,
PMCID: PMC6132541  PMID: 30030564

Abstract

Action is needed to face the global threat arising from inconsistent rainfall, rise in temperature, and salinization of farm lands which may be the product of climate change. As crops are adversely affected, man and animals may face famine. Plants are severely affected by abiotic stress (drought, salinity, alkalinity, and temperature), which impairs yield and results in loss to farmers and to the nation at large. However, microbes have been shown to be of great help in the fight against abiotic stress, via their biological activities at the rhizosphere of plants. The external application of chemical substances such as glycine betaine, proline, and nutrients has helped in sustaining plant growth and productive ability. In this review, we tried to understand the part played by bioinoculants in aiding plants to resist the negative consequences arising from abiotic stress and to suggest better practices that will be of help in today’s farming systems. The fact that absolute protection and sustainability of plant yield under stress challenges has not been achieved by microbes, nutrients, nor the addition of chemicals (osmo-protectants) alone suggests that studies should focus on the integration of these units (microbes, nutrients, chemical stimulants, and osmo-protectants) into a strategy for achieving a complete tolerance to abiotic stress. Also, other species of microbes capable of shielding plant from stress, boosting yield and growth, providing nutrients, and protecting the plants from harmful invading pathogens should be sought.

Keywords: Alkalinity, Climate change, Drought, Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Rhizosphere, Salinity

Introduction

The unpredictability of the hydrological cycle has posed a serious challenge to farmers, horticulturists, and to the global community, concerning its effect in meeting food needs of mankind and animals. The number of people to be fed is constantly increasing and food supplies are not meeting the demand.

In order to increase the quantity and quality of crops grown, agriculturists have intensified the use of open and ground water sources for irrigation purposes, which has a corresponding salinization implication.

However, the use of bioinoculants (plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria) has been of great help in combating this abiotic-climate-induced change that limits the overall performance of plants under stress (Alori et al. 2017a; Staudinger et al. 2016). The use of biofertilizers to enhance successful adaptation and survival of plants will gear toward ensuring a sustainable crop yield and improvement of soil fertility and structure. This is a good approach to stress management (Alori et al. 2017a). These microbes through deaminase enzyme production (Saleem et al. 2015), nodulation (Masciarelli et al. 2014), and other physiological activities at the rhizosphere help the plants tolerate stress.

External (exogenous) introduction of beneficial chemical substances as supplement has been used to improve resilience, yield, and tolerance of plants to the toxicity of these stress-imposed conditions, such as the application of caffeic acid (Klein et al. 2015), sodium polyacrylate (Hong et al. 2016), jasmonic acid (Khan et al. 2017), genistein (Hasanah and Rahmawati 2012), chitosan (Bistgani et al. 2017), humic acid (Kasmani et al. 2013), gibberellic acid and other hormones (Shaddad et al. 2013), and molybdenum (Bouzid and Rahmoune 2012). These chemicals aid the physiological performance and adaptation that manifest in a well-balanced morphological state of the plant growing in a stressful environment. The stresses range from drought, salinity, alkalinity, pathogenic microbial attack to chemicals.

Abiotic stresses are stress conditions to plants arising from the environment. They are the non-living part of the ecosystem whose effect is felt by the living component of the system. Nature is balance sensitive, and at short supply or deviation from the normal occurrence of these conditions will create a stress in the ecosystem and jeopardize the well-being of living things. Water, nutrients, salts, temperature, and pH are among the basic abiotic components of the agricultural ecosystem that have an influence on plants.

These abiotic stresses not only affect plants but also affect microbes. In an effort to survive and prevail despite the stiff competition among microbes particularly at the rhizosphere, some microbes possessing the cellulase enzyme capable of dissolving the cellulose cell wall of plant roots gain entrance into the apoplast of plants, the cell wall interior as well as the vascular bundle—xylem, where they live and undergo normal metabolic activities.

Although researchers have looked at various means of handling the stress inducers to enable plants to increase their survival and performance, yet, little has been done on the integrative aspect of this enhancement strategy of protecting and empowering plants to resist and grow better under drought, salinity, or alkaline conditions.

This review aims to understand the influence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in plant tolerance to abiotic stress, and to suggest a new trend involving the application of microbes, nutrients, nodule inducers, growth hormones, and osmo-protecting substances on growing plants (Fig. 1) exposed to abiotic stress, in order to achieve better performance and adaptation of crops and to increase the overall return on investment/expenditure of farmers.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The interactions of microbes, useful chemicals, and their overall influence in plant stress tolerance, growth, and productivity

Sustainable agriculture—the influence of climate change and human population growth on crop yield

The two major challenges affecting crop production in this modern time are climate change and escalation of human population number. The two are interrelated; one influences the other. As the human population increases, the need for fuel energy increases. Also, the need to generate heat for cooking food leads to deforestation. These human activities elevate the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Climate change could result in an unregulated supply of rain water which could either occur in excess or in prolonged short supply. Whichever the case, crop production is affected negatively. Extreme rain fall gives rise to erosion and flooding, while drought results in loss and poor performance of crops. In a bid to boost crop productivity and yield and to combat drought-induced stress, farmers resort to the use of irrigation which adds salt to the soil.

Drought is a great cause of poor yield of crops leading to food shortages.

Carbon dioxide increase, on the other hand, may aid the growth and nitrogen assimilation of plants. For example, although water limitation affects the clover plant’s fixation of nitrogen, in the presence of a moderate supply of water, the plant could still perform excellently in the presence of carbon (IV) oxide and increased atmospheric heat (Lazzarotto et al. 2010).

However, adequate nutrient management with respect to improving the fertility of the soil could be an aid in solving the problem of climate change challenges on crops (St Clair and Lynch 2010) together with the use of rhizobacteria to boost crop production (Babalola 2010).

Population explosion also creates an urgent need for the establishment of shelter, recreation centers, industrialization, urbanization, etc. to accommodate human activities, and this affects land availability for mechanized farming.

To sustain the nutritional need of the growing human population, agricultural practices must be intensified, irrespective of short supply of rain water, environmental effects of the use of inorganic chemicals (fertilizers), and salinity issues. The biotechnological application of microbes may address the rising problem and ensure sustainability in the provision of food for all. In addition, the use of biofuels in automobiles as well as the practice of afforestation should be encouraged to help cut down on greenhouse gas accumulation for effective control of climate change. The use of electric automobiles should also be incentivized.

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria—the redeemer of plants

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria are those indispensable microbes possessing the unique abilities of supporting directly and indirectly the wellbeing of plants. These microbes, in order to survive in the rhizosphere, expanded their biological activities that influence the survival and growth of plants (Babalola 2010).

A number of these microbes with the enzyme machinery necessary for the breakdown of the exudates of plants are able to protect the plant from stress arising from water scarcity and salt pollution. They produce a variety of substances such as deaminase enzyme (Saleem et al. 2015), plant hormone–indole acetic acid (Gujral et al. 2013), siderophore (Stajkovic-srbinovic et al. 2014), PO42− solubilizing enzyme (Kumari and Khanna 2016), salicylic acid (Ekinci et al. 2014), and microbiocidal/biostatic enzyme (Moustaine et al. 2017).

Some of these microbes contribute to plants nutritionally by trapping and integrating nitrogen into the plant via nitrogen fixation (Attitalla 2012). However, as a means of surviving the stiff competition for existence and dominance at the root environment, some microbes devise a means of burrowing/penetrating the tissues of plants and establish themselves as endophytes within the plant (Khan et al. 2016b), contributing not only to the nutrition of the plant but also to enhancing plants’ survival rate and adaptation to their environment.

PGPR contribute to sustaining the intrinsic resistance of plant to pathogenic and environmental challenges. Some of these organisms are excellent in biofilm formation and secretion of polysaccharide substances which confer stability to plants during stress (Kasim et al. 2016). As microbes contribute significantly in biohydrometallurgy by the generation of metal-rich solution through the biological oxidation of sulfur-containing ore, they also play a role in the immobilization of metals or cations and render them non-bioavailable using polymeric substances and other chemicals they produced (siderophores etc.) (Fashola et al. 2015). Their presence can contribute to the reduction in metal stress on plants when applied to them as bioinoculants. The growth and survival of plants will not be possible without the help of these “farmers’ friends” living both within and around the plant surfaces.

A healthy plant is a product of a healthy relationship between the plants and the growth-promoting microbes, while an unhealthy relationship could be observed in the degradation of the physical and physiological wellbeing of the plant. PGPR are the key players in the fight for sustainable plant development amidst stress conditions arising from climatic as well as manmade activities. The classes of microbes belonging to these group/genera are Micrococcaceae HW-2 (Hong et al. 2016), Bradyrhizobium (Masciarelli et al. 2014), Bacillus (Kasim et al. 2016), Microbacterium, Pseudomonas, Curtobacterium (Cardinale et al. 2015), Variovorax, Paenibacillus (Yolcu et al. 2011), Pantoea (Damam et al. 2014), and many others.

Drought stress in the reduction of plant performance

Drought has been implicated in the reduction of plant metabolic and physiological activities. It reveals its effect in the degree of biomass yield, growth, nodulation, and chlorophyll greenness of plants. It is a major agricultural crop impairment inducer and a global concern as it affects the supply and sustainability of food availability to people and livestock. Rainfall is the major source of water for growing crops/plants by farmers (in a subsistent agriculture) in many parts of the world. The gradual delay or low level of rainfall due to the influence of climate adjustment to manmade activities is affecting the biotic aspect of the ecosystem particularly green plants which are the primary and major producers of food upon which all life forms depend for meeting their daily nutritional needs.

The effect of drought is obvious, yet the microbes domiciled at the root zone of plants, known as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, have proven to contribute to the tolerance and quick adaptation and adjustment of plants to drought stress (Table 1) via supplementary production of phytohormones that induce root growth, thus allowing a better water absorption, production of deaminase enzyme responsible for the disintegration of ACC molecules, nitrogen fixation, and solubilization of P (Vurukonda et al. 2016a; Olanrewaju et al. 2017).

Table 1.

Contributions of microbes in the induction of drought tolerance by plants

Plant species Microbes Microbial enhanced plant productivity under stress References
Tomato Rhizophagus irregularis
Variovorax paradoxus 5C-2
Enhanced photosynthetic rate, reduced lipid oxidation, and increased root water conductivity and oxidative phosphorylation in the plant Calvo-Polanco et al. (2016)
Chickpea Pseudomonas putida MTCC5279 (RA) Reduced/controlled the expression of stress response gene, maintained water content, osmolyte, membrane structure, and germination rate of the plant Tiwari et al. (2016)
Maize Azospirillum spp. (Az19) Improve the growth and productivity of the plant under water stress compared to the control Garcia et al. (2017)
Wheat Piriformospora indica Enhanced adaptation of plant by promoting nutrient and water absorption, improved root growth, biomass, water, chlorophyll and modulate the activities of antioxidant molecules Hosseini et al. (2017)
Trifolium repens Rhizophagus intraradices
Bacillus megaterium
Pseudomonas putida
A consortium of these microbes increased plant nutrient and water contents, reduced stomatal conductance and stress enzyme activities for better adaptation to drought Ortiz et al. (2015)
Wheat Azospirillum brasilense Sp245 Increased growth and expansion of xylem in the coleoptile of inoculated plant for easy conduction of water Pereyra et al. (2012)
Lavandula dentata Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Bacillus thuringiensis
Co-inoculation enhanced plant growth, nutrient content, biomass, and reduction in lipid oxidation of the plant Armada et al. (2016)
Maize Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Bacillus thuringiensis
Improved nutrient content and water transport protein as well as reduce lipid oxidation in the stressed plant Armada et al. (2015a)
Brassica oxyrrhina Pseudomonas libanensis TR1
Pseudomonas reactans Ph3R3
Enhanced growth, pigment and water content as well as phytoaccumulation of heavy metals in the plant Ma et al. (2016)
Maize Pseudomonas putida (FBKV2) Encouraged root and shoot growth, dried biomass weight and reduced stomatal conductance in the plant Vurukonda et al. (2016b)
Common Bean Rhizobium Promoted plant weight, nutrient content and increased Phaseolus vulgaris yield Yanni et al. (2016)

The survival and enhanced influence of endophytic microbes toward poplar adaptation to water stress, for example, revealed that the presence of these organisms aided the physiological wellbeing of the plant and enabled it to tolerate water scarcity in the soil. The result showed 28% increase in biomass (shoot and roots) as against the control (Khan et al. 2016c).

The increase in root number and tissue mass promoted the wider reach of plant roots for water and nutrient absorption, which enabled them to thrive in water scarce environments. This survival approach of plants is akin to the aid of microbial symbionts capable of plant hormone production (indole acetic acid, gibberellin), which stimulate growth and the resultant stress annulment for better performance of the plant.

In line with the survival-induced strategy, the endophytes will produce a poly-sugar substance known as trehalose, capable of protecting biologically produced compounds and molecules from breakdown during water induced osmotic tension (Khan et al. 2016c).

It was observed that Ocimum basilicum L., the plant popularly known as basil, had improved chlorophyll pigment content and antioxidant activity under water-induced stress in the presence of mixed rhizobacteria consortium—Pseudomonas sp., Bacillus lentus, and Azospirillum brasilens (Heidari and Golpayegani 2012), which indicated the aid of microbes in the synthesis of useful substances in the plant in spite of the prevailing stress challenges. Among the nitrogen fixers of atmospheric N to plants for its nutritional needs, Azospirillum is a good farmers’ friend that contributes in enriching the soil and enabling plants to thrive under abiotic stress. This microbe, which possesses a list of unique attributes such as auxin production, deaminase enzyme production, siderophore–iron trapping substance, nitrogen fixation, exopolysaccharide, etc., enables its associates (plants) to tolerate drought as well as salt disturbances (Cruz et al. 2017a; Vacheron et al. 2015).

Azospirillum generates biocidal substances (bacteriocins, hydrogen cyanide, proteolytic enzymes, siderophores) capable of destroying pathogen/invaders of plants and encourages plants to tolerate abiotic stresses as well as living organisms inducing stress on plants. It could be regarded as a plant growth-promoting bacteria and is widely studied by researchers (Vacheron et al. 2015; Creus et al. 2010). The contribution of this organism in nutrient uptake by plant as well as water-facilitated uptake is well documented. Therefore, Azospirillum and other microbes capable of enriching and unbinding trapped nutrients and making them available for easy taking up by plants are called biofertilizer and they in turn depend on plant excretory products (root exudates) for their nutrition (Babalola 2010).

A closer look at the biosynthesis of siderophore by Gordonia rubripertincta CWB2 suggests that gorA gene under expression in Escherichia coli produce GorA hydroxylase enzyme (N-hydroxylating monooxygenase) which was able to hydroxylate the substrate putrescine (1, 4 diaminobutane) in the presence of coenzyme (FAD and NADPH). The hydroxamate is a crucial part in siderophore synthesis. It is responsible for binding to irons and other metallic elements in the rhizosphere (Esuola et al. 2016).

A screening study on rhizobacteria obtained from cacti rhizosphere showed that the predominant isolate belonging to the Bacillus sp. exhibited amazing plant growth-promoting traits like the production of indole acetic acid, PO42− solubilization, and hydrogen cyanide and NH3 production. Bacillus has the attribute of producing exopolysaccharide substances that enable them to form biofilms and survive harsh environments, and has contributed to the survival, growth, and performance of Zea mays L. seedlings leaf area, stem, and biomass shoot dry weight in a simulated water stress experiment (Kavamura et al. 2013). This attribute of poly-sugar production by microbes strengthens the resistance of inoculated plants to water stress inhibitory effects and thus ensures their growth and survival in a water-deficient environment (Nocker et al. 2012).

To understand the consequences of water deficiency on plant physiological condition and activities, groundnut plants were subjected to water stress using a hydrocarbon compound—polyethylene glycol, which neither penetrated nor posed any toxicity effect to the plant, rather it caused a decrease in the plant RNA, chlorophyll composition, and water content shortfall in the plant. The observed effect is concentration based. The higher the concentration of the polyethylene glycol, the higher the water stress effect it exerts on the plant and the higher the corresponding reduction effect of RNA in the leaves and roots. This effect was observed in the quantity of water content of the plant leaf (relative water content). The drought interfered with chlorophyll a more than b (Meher et al. 2017). The production of oxygen radicals and hydrogen peroxide molecules are responsible for destruction of lipids and the breakdown of chlorophyll which leads to reduction and yellowing of the leaves (Meher et al. 2017).

In another experiment, a legume plant (Aspalathus linearis) was subjected to drought condition via withholding of water supply to the plant. This led to an observable effect on the photosynthetic rate of the plant by 40% reduction as well as 61% reduction in stomatal conductance, as a consequences of continuous closure of stomata to maintain intracellular water content and cut down on water loss from the leaves. This is one of the strategies plants adopt to increase their efficiency in the use of water during drought stress periods. Drought-induced closure of stomata has a direct connection with the reduction in plant assimilation and fixation of carbon (IV) oxide from the atmosphere. Inadequate supply of water directly impedes the process of photosynthesis in plants. Preferential development and growth of underground plant parts (roots) to shoot parts of the plant undergoing stress was also observed, which enabled the plant to absorb more water from the inner layer of the earth (Lotter et al. 2014).

Although A. linearis is capable of forming a symbiotic relationship with rhizobium microbe, drought, on the other hand, affected the nitrogen nutritional content of the plant as a result of its influence on the activities of the nodules and the N2 fixing enzyme (nitrogenase). This consequently makes the plant more dependent on the available nitrogen in the soil (Lotter et al. 2014).

Periodic or interval water supply through rain water to rice farming has proven to contribute to water stress in rice plants. Rice, being a moderately water-loving plant, finds it difficult to cope with dryness arising from drought and requires a suitable measure for increasing the adaptability and productivity of the plant in a low water vicinity. The application of potassium salts as nutrient (potassium chloride and potassium sulfate) could be a good measure in reducing water stress on rice plants. Potassium nutrient applied at a concentration of 120 kg per hectare was able to increase rice yield and the index of its harvest within 15 days of water scarcity (Zain and Ismail 2016). Potassium has a link with the efficiency of water use by the plant and improves it via the promotion of transpiration-pull-boost with the assistance of potassium ions which are components of cell membranes mediating active transport of nutrients as well as water into the rice plant.

The ease of water entry from the soil into the plant contributes in canceling the potential damage of tissues by oxygen radicals during water-deficient condition. A 338% increase in proline concentration within the plant treated with K+ salt was observed (Zain and Ismail 2016).

The use of sugar beet fermented by Aspergillus niger as soil amendment in the presence of bioinoculant Bacillus megaterium and a consortium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi promoted plant growth, biomass, nutritional content, and water level and reduced the conductance of stomata and the activities of enzymatic antioxidants in plants faced with drought stress. The amendment boosted the effectiveness of the bacteria toward supporting the growth and productivity of the stressed plant (Armada et al. 2014).

The importance of water as a medium for transport and biochemical reaction in a living system cannot be overemphasized. A limited water environment interferes with the smooth biochemical processes and interaction of molecules in the plant as well as its associated microbes in the rhizosphere. The performance of Glycine max under drought stress was increased in the presence of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and a nodulation stimulant—genistein. Genistein as well as daidzein iso-flavone substances are capable of inducing response reaction of nodule gene expression in Bradyrhizobium sp. These compounds are components of exudates from legume roots. Genistein treatment of G. max seed together with a bioinoculant (B. japonicum) greatly encouraged the resistance of soybean to drought stress and decreased its detrimental effect on the formation of nodules by the microbe (Hasanah and Rahmawati 2012).

The tolerance of plants to drought stress is dependent on their own genetic makeup. The physical manifestation observed in a plant is in direct correlation with the quality and quantity of the physiological activities taking place at the gene level. All biomolecules produced are the product of gene expression. The easier the expression of genes encoding the biomolecules that protect the plant cellular component from drought induced cellular destruction/damage, the more the viability and productivity of the plant at a given stress condition. Different species of soybean undergoing a 15-day vegetative growth under drought stress revealed that the electrolyte loss was more in plant tissue stressed for 10 days and above. The shoot dry matter or biomass concentration decreased (by 79.18%) at the 10th day to 15th day of stress, while the root biomass or dry weight/root growth increased (by 100.96%). This means that drought promotes the accumulation of nutrient and photosynthetic products at the root and stimulates its growth and development to maintain balance, adjustment, and sustainability of plant physiological adaptation to the stress problem. Soybean species (SJ-4) possessing unique genetic/physiological characteristics performed better than others under drought stress and should be the crop of choice for drought-predominant locations (Tint et al. 2011).

Also, two soybean species showed slight yield reduction of 8 and 12%, respectively, as compared to when grown under consistent water supply via irrigation. This implies that they are good in tolerating drought as a result of their inherent delay in wilting and a corresponding elongation of fixation of carbon dioxide in their leaves (Pathan et al. 2014).

In the same vein, the accumulation of amino acid (proline) in the leaves of tomato plant and increased value of the relative water content of the leaves of the plant confer resistance to drought by tomato plant. Proline is responsible for sustaining the movement of water molecules from a region of higher concentration to that of a lower concentration in response to concentration gradient between the plant and its environment. It helps the plant maintain its turgor intracellular pressure by facilitating movement of available water from the soil into the root of the plant (Jureková et al. 2011).

A non-bioinoculant phyto-drought-stress-mediated strategy involving the application of chitosan to a plant (thyme) undergoing drought stress helped to offset the effect of drought on the plant by 20% compared to the untreated control which showed a decrease in dry matter of the plant by 54 and 56% on the photosynthesis retardation of the plant under drought stress (Bistgani et al. 2017). In the same manner, it encouraged the synthesis of essential oil in the thyme plant, reduced the degree of peroxidation, sustained the cell membrane conformation and function, and stimulated the accumulation of proline amino acid in the leaves of the plant by 20% (Bistgani et al. 2017). Being a polysaccharide, chitosan is generated from chitin alkalinization of N-deacetylation. These molecules are abundant in the outer skeletons of insects, fungi, and algae cell wall composition and are implicated in secondary metabolite production in plants when applied to them (Lei et al. 2011).

A sainfoin plant inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi exhibited 7.27, 4.21, and 2.40% increase for relative water content, N2, and P leaves total content, respectively, at the 40th day of the experiment. This fungus enabled the plant to adapt and survive during drought limitations by enhancing plant growth and protecting it from damage induced by stress (Jing et al. 2014). Generally, an external–internal symbiotic relationship by soil fungi (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi) performs the same protective role as endophyte does to plants. There is a biomass increase as well as a decrease of Fusarium oxysporum infectivity of tomato plant inoculated with Glomus intraradices and Piriformospora indica irrespective of the nutritional content of the soil used (Cruz et al. 2017b). Also, the involvement of mycorrhizal fungi in nutrient dissolution/solubilization particularly as it concerns phosphorus gives credence to its participation in the direct promotion of plant health and productivity.

These microbes form a channel (protein transport channel) for dissolution and absorption of solubilized PO42− from the rhizosphere into the host plant in a mutualistic dependent relationship. They are generally used as biofertilizers for immobilized nutrient dissolution via the organic acids produced which are capable of reacting with the compounds of trapped minerals and converting them to soluble forms for easy assimilation by plants (Igiehon and Babalola 2017).

The presence of mycorrhizal fungi adds further surface area for water and nutrient acquisition, thereby making the plant more resilient and tolerant to the climate change-induced stress. This notwithstanding, they also partake in structure building, arrangement, and improvement of soil for proper aeration and migration of water together with nutrients in the soil, making the soil healthy and fertile (Igiehon and Babalola 2017; Alori et al. 2017a). It is a known fact that fungi can survive and thrive well in a dry or semi-dry soil and still perform their normal activities. This property is exploited by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in making an inoculated plant perform its activities under drought condition as the organism reaches out for more water within the soil where the roots of the plant can possibly not reach (Alori et al. 2017a).

In addition to fungi solubilizing PO42− bacteria, the enzymes (phytase, phosphatase) can produce organic acid (acetic acid, citric acid) and will be able to mineralize or solubilize P via ionic interaction of the charged group in these molecules. These solubilizers of P play a part in the enrichment of soil fertility and supporting plant nutritional requirements irrespective of the prevailing bioavailability or non-bioavailability of the nutrient in the soil. Though the level of available P can determine the function of the microbes as it relates to solubilization of P, the higher the available nutrients, the less the quest to solubilize already immobilized phosphorus and vice versa. Microbes are the key players in the replenishment of P in the soil (Alori et al. 2017b; Zhu et al. 2011).

Also, bacterial inoculation of rice plant using Pseudomonas fluorescens promoted the intrinsic tolerance of rice plant to drought stress and encouraged the expression of abscisic acid synthetic genes particularly at the stage of reproduction by the plant. This confers an induced systemic plant resistance to drought stress. It implies that microbes, especially the PGPR colonizing the rhizosphere of plants, have an indirect as well as a direct role in enhancing the expression of genes by water-deficient plants through a process known as induced systemic resistance. Microbes in their various capacities have been shown to aid plants in their tolerance to drought (Saakre et al. 2017; Bresson et al. 2013).

The symbiotic N2 fixers (Sinorhizobium meliloti and Sinorhizobium medicae), on the other hand, possess the ability of protecting a legume (Medicago truncatula) from senescence of the leaves under drought stress (Staudinger et al. 2016). The rhizobial inoculants aid in the delay of the process of senescence by promoting the accumulation of potassium ions, reduction in the protein mediating ethylene production, and induction of cytokinin production which inhibit senescence and accumulation of sugars and amino acids that aided in the plant survival during stress.

Nodulated medicago plants recovered from drought stress faster than the non-nodulated legumes as a result of the shifts in the carbon partitioning from starch to sugars and thus the enhanced allocation of reserves to osmolytes during drought, enabling to stay green with the ability of fast recovery after rewatering (Staudinger et al. 2016).

Drought stress reduced relative water content and chlorophyll and increased proline concentration of the plant (wheat) (Keyvan 2010). Obviously, drought affects root, shoot, yield, and overall performance of the affected plant. Yet at moderate water scarcity or even severe conditions, the intrinsic quality of the plant determines to a large extent its sensitivity or tolerance to the drought condition. The osmotic adjustment and performance of three barley plant species (yousof, fajr 30, and morocco) was measured when they were subjected to different drought treatments (moderate and severe). The results showed that yousof species possesses a drought tolerance trait and was able to have an increased root length to shoot length ratio under severe stress conditions.

The test plants survived the water stress by employing an adjustment in the osmotic behavior of their root systems leading to the accumulation of solutes such as proline in their cells to maintain the cell structure and function during water scarcity. This adjustment in osmosis to sustain the turgidity of the plant cells directly influences the escalation level of photosynthesis and tissue growth of plant during drought stress (Afshari-Behbahanizadeh et al. 2014).

The symbiont (Bradyrhizobium sp.) aided the tolerance of cowpea plant to water scarcity stress and boosted the quality of NO3 (nitrate) and amino acid (proline) in the inoculated plant (Barbosa et al. 2013).

Groundnut inoculated by Bradyrhizobium under drought conditions had a large quantity of amino acids which was derived from the nitrogenase-catalyzed conversion of atmospheric N to NH4+ ions necessary for amino acid and protein formation in the plant (Delfini et al. 2010). The observed increase in protein level of legume-inoculated plants implied that these microbes aid in the supply of nitrogen via fixation in the presence of the nitrogenase enzyme operating at the root nodules of the plant. Bioinoculation of legume plant with rhizobium has helped to encourage the development of many leaves in the plant due to the greater number of root nodules in the plant roots that aid in nitrogen fixation (Ferreira et al. 2011).

The treatment of annual medic plant growing in sufficient water (irrigated) and water-deficient (dry farming) systems with a mixture of biofertilizer and chemical fertilizer in an integrated fertilization practice encouraged the plant to efficiently adapt to the water-deficient condition and accumulate both macro- and micronutrients in the tissues of the plant compared to the use of chemical fertilizer alone. The application of bioinoculants and mineral fertilizer to a plant growing in a water-limiting environment is more (Table 2) effective in boosting plant productivity than in water-sufficient soil (Shabani et al. 2015).

Table 2.

Plant drought stress tolerance mediated by synergy between microbes and soil amendment

Plant species Microbes Amendment Plant productivity and tolerance outcome References
Arundo donax Micrococcaceae HW-2 Sodium polyacrylate Microbial attributes of plant hormone, deaminase and siderophore production and enhanced water retention capacity of sodium polyacrylate promoted shoot growth, biomass, and root of the plant Hong et al. (2016)
Thymus vulgaris
Santolina chamaecyparissus
Lavandula dentate
Salvia officinalis
Enterobacter sp.
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus megaterium
Bacillus sp.
Fermented agrowaste The amendment enhanced nutrient uptake via bacterial stimulated activities for proper nutrient absorption by plants and stomatal conductance during drought stress Armada et al. (2015b)
Pinus halepensis Azospirillum brasilense
Pantoea dispersa
Olive-mill waste The treatment and the inoculants promoted the carbohydrate and microbial biomass carbon as well as soil nutrient and consequently increased growth, water content and nutrient uptake by the plant Mengual et al. (2014a)
Lavandula dentata L. Bacillus megaterium
Enterobacter sp.
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus sp.
Composted sugar beet It increased biomass shoot dry weight, root, and nutrient content of the plant. The amendment increased the concentration of bioavailable phosphorus and nitrogen in the plant rhizosphere Mengual et al. (2014b)
Cistus albidus L. Azospirillum brasilense
Pantoea dispersa
Olive residue Increased dry root, shoot weight, organic carbon, soil enzymes, and microbial biomass carbon Schoebitz et al. (2014)

The attenuation capacity of microbes to the negative effects of drought on plant development was facilitated by the use of a combination of Azotobacter chroococcum and Pseudomonas fluorescence together with phosphorus fertilizer, and was able to boost the inorganic P content of the plant (soybean) growing under insufficient and abundant water content of the soil. The N content of the leaves and root of the soybean plant were increased by 6 and 8% under water stress condition. The absorption of phosphorus in the soybean plant under the influence of bioinoculant increased by 16% (Vladimir 2012).

Although drought negatively affected plant development such as water content, chlorophyll of the leaves, and the dry weight of the root with a corresponding increase in the amino acid proline and abscisic acid–osmoprotecting molecules, yet the application of humic acid to the drought-stressed plant has reversed the observed effect by decreasing the quantity of proline and absicsic acid content of the treated plant, with resultant increases in chlorophyll content, dry weight of the root, and water content of the pistachio plant during drought stress circumstances (Kasmani et al. 2013).

However, from the above reviewed information, it is clear that bioinoculants and the application of useful chemicals and amino acid could help plants avert the challenges of drought conditions and aid in the promotion of a sustainable production of crops especially in those regions prone to water scarcity (insufficient rain fall).

Salt-induced challenges on plant

The deleterious nature of sodium chloride and other salt compounds on the growth and development of plants particularly in inducing water limitation stress and uncontrollable negative stomata closure cannot be overemphasized. This necessitates the application of an attenuation strategy to cancel the effect of salt on crops.

The co-inoculation of Pseudomonas and endomycorrhizae on cowpea plant undergoing salt-induced stress showed a decrease in the mycorrhizal infection of the plant. Treatment of 6000 ppm sodium chloride in the presence of the fungi and bacteria increased the carotenoid concentration (0.449 mg/g). Also, osmolytes (proline and sugars) increased in the presence of endomycorrhizae inoculation in the plant. Irrigation with tap water in the midst of endomycorrhizae and Pseudomonas fluorescens gave higher fresh and dry weight, pod length, seed number, and protein content of the cowpea plant (Manaf and Zayed 2015) compared to the one irrigated with salt water.

As part of microbial facilitated plant tolerance to salinity, biofilm formation is a suitable strategy which microbes employ in enhancing barley plant tolerance to soil salinity. This was observed in the aversion/reversal of the harmful effect of salt on a number of growth parameters such as seedling length, relative water content of the plant’s leaf as well as fresh and dry weight of barley plant. This biofilm formation strategy by microbes is actually a means of protecting themselves from the harsh conditions they found themselves in (short supply of nutrient, ionic toxicity as well as water limitation induced osmotic stress), enhancing survival within the presence of these limited resources by aggregating in masses (sessile compartmentalization) of cells at both living and non-living surfaces present at the root environment and contributing indirectly to tolerance ability of the plant to stress (Kasim et al. 2016; Qurashi and Sabri 2012).

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (SQR9) contributed to maize salt tolerance by enhancing its chlorophyll production level via colonizing and interacting with the plant roots. It also aids in the exclusion of sodium from the plant root, and stimulates the production of sugars and antioxidant within the tissues of the maize plant (Chen et al. 2016). This implies that a sensitive plant could become tolerant to salt stress in the presence of a bioinoculant.

This unique contribution to the wellbeing of the plant (Table 3) could be ascribed to its ability to produce indole acetic acid, solubilize phosphorus, colonize the plant root, and produce enzyme deaminase (ACC-deaminase) capable of maintaining optimum biological function of the plant in the midst of stress inducers.

Table 3.

The unique contributions of microbes to salinity tolerance by plants

Plants Microbes Microbial influenced plant productivity and salinity tolerance Reference
Chili Bacillus spp.
Alcaligenes spp.
Proteus spp.
Aneurinibacillus aneurinilyticus
Significantly increased root and shoot length more than the control Patel et al. (2017)
Rice Enterobacter sp. Promoted the growth of rice seedling and reduced ethylene production and antioxidant enzyme activities in the plant Sarkar et al. (2018)
Rice Bacillus sp. Aided the alleviation of salt stress by increasing the biomass and growth of rice seedling via production of indole acetic acid and deaminase enzyme Misra et al. (2017)
Festuca arundinacea Enterobacter ludwigii Membrane transport protein in the microbe that control sodium and hydrogen ion movement across bacteria cell and the production of plant hormone, phosphate solubilization, nitrogen fixation contribute towards the growth, tolerance, and plant productivity Kapoor et al. (2017)
Alfalfa Halomonas maura
Ensifer meliloti
Increased the weight of shoot dry weight, yield, and water content of the plant Martinez et al. (2015)
Rice Thalassobacillus denorans (NCCP-58)
Oceanobacillus kapialis (NCCP-76)
Inoculated plant was observed to have increased germination ability, root and shoot growth, protein, and chlorophyll contents as well as nutrient contents with reduced sodium ion accumulation in the plant Shah et al. (2017)
Rice Bacillus pumilus Enhanced plant growth and decreased the accumulation of sodium ions without having an effect on boron accumulation in the leaf tissues Khan et al. (2016a)
Oat Klebsiella sp. It boosted plant growth, water content, dry shoot, and root weight of inoculated plant Sapre et al. (2018)
Wheat Bacillus subtilis Enhanced salicyclic acid content of the plant, leaf water content, and reduced proline and malondialdehyde content of the plant for better induction of systemic resistance Lastochkina et al. (2017)
Barley Hartmannibacter diazotrophicus The production of deaminase enzyme enhanced percentage root and shoot dry weight and growth of the plant Suarez et al. (2015)
Canola Enterobacter cloacae HSNJ4 Enhanced canola tolerance via promotion of plant hormone content of the plant and reduced ethylene and malondialdehyde content. Root, shoot, and chlorophyll contents were improved Li et al. (2017)
Sunflower Rhizophagus irregularis
Chryseobacterium humi ECP37
Ochrobacterium haematophilum ZR3-5
Improved biomass and nutritional content of the plant as well as antioxidant response in the plant and lowered sodium ion content in the plant Pereira et al. (2016)
Lettuce
Radish
Chinese cabbage
Arthrobacter scleromae SYE-3 Increased all the plant shoot length and leaf number in lettuce by 45.1% Hong and Lee (2017)

With a shift in perspective, it was understood that opportunistic pathogens of humans can aid in plant tolerance to salt stress. The organism Methylobacterium mesophilicum could efficiently colonize and dominate the root rhizosphere region of three plants (cucumber, tomato, and paprika) under the study at salt concentration as high as 6% and possess the capability of phytohormone (IAA) production together with fungicidal enzyme production that contributes to the growth, protection, and tolerance of the plant to biotic and abiotic stress (Egamberdieva et al. 2015b).

Sensitive crops have remarkable reduction in viability and performance when challenged with salt stress as compared to tolerant species, following the observed accumulation of proline and reduced leaf area in a sensitive wheat plant compared to a tolerant plant. However, the application of synthesized phyto-hormone (gibberellic acid) on salt-stressed wheat plants has resulted in adequate adaptation of two wheat plant species to salt-influenced stress and improved its yield (Shaddad et al. 2013).

Moreover, the efficiency of microbial exopolysaccharide formation and the formation of biofilm during environmental stress at the plant rhizosphere is a contributory factor toward plant adjustment to salinity or salt-induced osmotic shock. The polysaccharide molecules produced by microbes in a bid to protect themselves from desiccation and ionic toxicity have a charged part which reacts with dissociated sodium ions and chelates them. This reduces the toxicity and abundance of these ions in the rhizosphere, making the soil suitable for root proliferation (Arora et al. 2010).

The quest for a better way to reduce or alleviate stress inducers has led researchers to investigate the use of non-biological methods such as the external application of micronutrient Mo (molybdenum) as an additive to plants facing salinity stress. When molybdenum was applied to a bean plant (Phaseolus vulgaris) subjected to salt stress, the plant was able to maintain its chlorophyll composition and tissue components. Mo being a unique player (cofactor) in cellular enzyme biosynthesis and activities enhanced the formation of chlorophyll and maintenance of adequate cellular function (Bouzid and Rahmoune 2012).

The critical evaluation of the microbial community of Aster tripolium L. showed the predominance of gram-positive bacteria residing in the root of the halophyte, while gram-negative bacteria exist more in the rhizosphere and bulk part of the soil. The isolated organism exhibited the ability of forming 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase, indole acetic acid, etc. that contribute to the survival and tolerance of the plant to salt-induced stress and toxicity (Szyma’nskaa et al. 2016).

It was noted that rhizosphere bacteria of a desert-adapted plant (Suaeda fruticosa) from Kutch Desert has a unique strain of bacteria (Bacillus licheniformis strain A2), which solubilized phosphate, produced indole acetic acid, siderophore etc., and contributed to 31% groundnut height and 43% biomass increment of the plant and 24 and 28% rise when grown in 50 mM sodium chloride supplemented soil (Goswamia et al. 2014).

Another non-biological stress alleviation technique showed that caffeic acid was able to aid the plant (soybean) tolerate salt stress. The applied caffeic acid stimulated the NO (nitric oxide) composition of the nodules, which has a direct relationship with the induction of cyclic guanine monophosphate responsible for controlling reactive oxygen radicals produced in the stressed plant. Caffeic acid helps to shield nitrogenase enzyme and leghemoglobin of the soybean root nodules from the destructive effect of sodium and chloride ions, thereby adding to the growth of the plant by enabling the symbionts to fix nitrogen adequately to meet plant nitrogen requirements. Caffeic acid has also been implicated in chlorosis suppression of treated plants undergoing salinity-induced stress (Klein et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2011).

On the other hand, it was demonstrated that sodium chloride impedes the uptake of potassium ions by Broussonetia papyrifera plant, resulting in high sodium to potassium ratio. Sodium ion equally decreased the calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus content of the plant root system and caused an induced ion imbalance in the plant rhizosphere. Bio-active enzymes responsible for controlling oxygen radicals (catalase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase) were also decreased by the inhibitory effect of the high salt concentration in the plant environment. Protein content of the plant was also affected as observed in the appearance and disappearance of protein bands in the plant samples analyzed (Zhang et al. 2013). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculated on wheat plant promoted its root and shoot growth and the weight of the fresh tissue component of the plant. The observed rates of plant growth were from 62.2 to 78.1% in the presence of the bioinoculant (Orhan 2016). This could be attributed to the production of phyto-hormone by the microbes. Stress-adapted bacteria (Pseudomonas putida R4 and Pseudomonas chlororaphis R5) capable of producing plant hormone (IAA) at the rhizosphere of inoculated cotton plant subjected to salt stress completely averted salinity stress on cotton plant (Egamberdieva et al. 2015a). This was also found in cotton plant inoculated with Klebsiella oxytoca (Rs-5) that resulted in the increase in seed germination (15.40%), growth, and overall tolerance of cotton to salinity stress (Wu et al. 2014).

A newly identified rhizobacteria (Ochrobactrum intermedium) possessing the survival ability of changing its membrane phospholipid composition when subjected to stress condition and also producing indole acetic acid, siderophores, deaminase enzyme, and utilization of nitrate happens to improve the growth (root and shoot) of groundnut plant subjected to salt stress better than a well-known classified Bradyrhizobium sp. (C145) accepted as a suitable groundnut inoculant by the Argentine INTA organization. The organism also performed better in the production of biofilm than Bradyrhizobium and recorded high tolerance to 300 mmol sodium chloride and higher temperature (Paulucci et al. 2015).

Soil additives containing a variety of organic matter (poultry droppings, olive plant waste, rice straw, molasses) and a consortium of microbes known as “effective microbe” (bacteria, yeast, photosynthetic bacteria, actinomycetes, etc.), collectively regarded as bokashi, have proven to be effective in shielding Mandarin tree (citrus plant) from salt stress and improving its productivity, and the nutritional content of the fruit, and also in enhancing the rhizosphere microbial community count and population (El-Hamied 2014). The bokashi treatment has aided greatly in the salted soil fertility improvement and protection of the plant from osmotic salt-induced stress (El-Hamied 2014).

In a salt toxicity alleviation study, microbial species known as Kocuria erythromyxa EY43 and Staphylococcus kloosii EY37 were found to be very potent in increasing strawberry plant growth, chlorophyll, mineral content, and fruit yield. The organism was able to inhibit the absorption of toxic ions (sodium and chloride ions) from the plant rhizosphere making a salinity-sensitive strawberry plant insensitive and tolerant to the condition of salt stress (Karlidag et al. 2013). The integration of endophytic bacteria (Sphingomonas sp. LK11) with applied jasmonic acid synergistically improved the overall tolerance of tomato plants (wild type and mutant species) to salinity. The combined applied microbe–jasmonic acid enhanced root and shoot growth of the plant, brought about proper regulation of glutathione content of the plant, and enabled it overcome the detrimental effects of salinity. It was noted that the microbial-jasmonate treatment lowered the intracellular abscisic acid level of the plants (Khan et al. 2017).

Although application of nutrients or minerals is an alternative measure to curbing salinity stress, introduction of excess of these nutrients will result in phytotoxicity instead of phytoenhancement and will necessitate remediation.

Three hundred percent growth in barley plant growing in salt-containing soil was recorded when inoculated with Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens which did not fully express the attributes of plant growth promotion in pure culture growth medium. This organism, being relatively new in this branch of study, was originally associated with the infection and destruction of crops but was now found to protect plants (barley) from salt stress better than the well-known microbes exhibiting excellent characteristics of plant growth promotion such as Microbacterium natoriense and Pseudomonas brassicacearum (Cardinale et al. 2015).

Rhizobium naturally adapted to desert environments has been shown to perform well in establishing nodules on the root of legumes at a high level of salt–soil content and to contribute to growth and better performance of the legume (Sobti et al. 2015). Also, an endophytic bacteria (Bacillus subtilis LK14) isolated from the plant (Moringa peregrina) bark possesses high indole acetic acid production capacity and ACC-deaminase was able to improve the growth and development of tomato plant seedlings (Khan et al. 2016b).

Microbial facilitated survival of plants under saline tension is dependent on microbial production of deaminase enzyme (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase) responsible for degrading the plant product known as aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate, the precursor of the plant hormone (ethylene) (Adams and Yang 1979; Dong et al. 1992; Honma and Shimomura 1978; Glick et al. 2007). This hormone is responsible for the interference of root development when challenged with stress substances that induce elevated level of ethylene production and is well documented by Tak et al. (2013).

Chickpea plant affected by an increase in salinity was rescued by co-inoculation with two deaminase enzyme-producing microbes (Mesorhizobium MBD26 and Rhizobacteria RHD 18) with an observed nodulation capacity of 49 nodules per plant, 201 mg weight of nodules, 12.28 mg per plant nitrogen, and a rise in 31.2% of the above the soil plant part dry weight (shoot dry weight). The result was further increased to 53 nodules and 116.9% grain produced, with N2 level spanning between 9.59 and 27.36 mg per plant investigated (Chaudhary and Sindhu 2017).

The production of deaminase by rhizobacteria, on the other hand, encouraged the root growth of velvet beans undergoing drought stress by catalyzing the disintegration of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate to generate nutrients for the microbes and in turn create a shortage of the ingredient (ACC) necessary for the production of ethylene. This helped to limit the action of this hormone (Saleem et al. 2015). The inoculation of Bradyrhizobium japonicum together with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens enabled better nodule formation on the soybean roots by the B. japonicum and resulted in better fixation of nitrogen and plant viability (Masciarelli et al. 2014).

Alkalinity stress in phyto-retardation

Apart from stress induced by sodium chloride, sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) and sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO3) also constitute a problem to crops. They are implicated in the formation of alkaline soil that results in elevated soil pH and interferes with the bioavailability of phosphorus, iron, copper, manganese, and zinc resulting in induced nutrient deficiency and osmotic stress capable of interfering with the proper biological function of the plant (Chen et al. 2011). The high pH has its own inhibitory challenges on non-alkaliphiles inhabiting the rhizosphere. It also interferes with their biological activities as well as physiological functions of the plant.

However, fertility issues of alkaline soil could be handled by the application of bioinoculants. These microbes ameliorate the alkalinity effect on plant by supporting increase in the number of nodules formed. They boost nitrogenase enzyme activities for efficient nitrogen fixation and improve mycorrhizal dominance in the root of faba bean inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum and mycorrhizal fungi. The team work between the two organisms promoted faba bean productivity and resistance to alkalinity stress (Abd-Alla et al. 2014).

Conclusion

The reality of abiotic stress in reducing the availability of food for the growing human population is obvious. The temperature of the atmosphere is rising and deviation or instability in rainfall is frequently observed in our environment today. This creates a tension in the sustainability of farming practice for food production. And as human beings devise an alternative to combat these challenges by adopting irrigation methods, salinity becomes the end product of this alternative practice. This also affects plants negatively.

Significant effects of plant tolerance to abiotic stress are that it will result in promoting yield and production of crops to feed humans and livestock. This can be achieved via the search, selection, and engineering of plant species capable of resisting salinity and drought stress.

The use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria will go a long way in supporting the plant to develop both intrinsic and extrinsic ability to tolerate stressful conditions and sustain yield. An integrated abiotic stress management strategy of co-integration of external application of proline, caffeic acid, nutrients, synthetic plant hormones, and microbes (PGPR) could aid greatly in ensuring continuous and efficient agricultural practices that will manage the stress and boost the yield of crops.

Acknowledgments

M.C.E. is supported by the NRF-TWAS/African Renaissance Doctoral Scholarship. This work is based on the research supported by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grants Ref: UID81192, UID95111; OOB).

Funding

The study was funded by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grants Ref: UID81192, UID95111; OOB) and the South Africa’s National Research Foundation/The World Academy of Science African Renaissance Scholarship (NRF-TWAS/African Renaissance Doctoral Scholarship).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Abd-Alla MH, El-Enany AE, Nafady NA, Khalaf DM, Morsy FM. Synergistic interaction of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as a plant growth promoting biofertilizers for faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in alkaline soil. Microbiol Res. 2014;169:49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2013.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams DO, Yang SF. Ethylene biosynthesis: identification of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid as an intermediate in the conversion of methionine to ethylene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76:170–174. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Afshari-Behbahanizadeh S, Akbari GA, Shahbazi M, Alahdadi I. Relations between barley root traits and osmotic adjustment under terminal drought stress. J Agric Sci. 2014;6(7):112–119. [Google Scholar]
  4. Alori ET, Dare MO, Babalola OO. Sustainable agriculture reviews. Switzerland: Springer; 2017. Microbial inoculants for soil quality and plant health; pp. 281–307. [Google Scholar]
  5. Alori ET, Glick BR, Babalola OO. Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:971. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Armada E, Portela G, Roldan A, Azcon R. Combined use of beneficial soil microorganism and agrowaste residue to cope with plant water limitation under semiarid conditions. Geoderma. 2014;232-234:640–648. [Google Scholar]
  7. Armada E, Azcon R, Lopez-Castillo OM, Calvo-Polanco M, Ruiz-Lozano JM. Autochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Bacillus thuringiensis from a degraded Mediterranean area can be used to improve physiological traits and performance of a plant of agronomic interest under drought conditions. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015;90:64–74. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Armada E, Barea J-M, Castillo P, Roldan A, Azcon R. Characterization and management of autochthonous bacterial strains from semiarid soils of Spain and their interactions with fermented agrowastes to improve drought tolerance in native shrub species. Appl Soil Ecol. 2015;96:306–318. [Google Scholar]
  9. Armada E, Probanza A, Roldan A, Azcon R. Native plant growth promoting bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis and mixed or individual mycorrhizal species improved drought tolerance and oxidative metabolism in Lavandula dentate plants. J Plant Physiol. 2016;192:1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Arora M, Kaushik A, Rani N, Kaushik CP. Effect of cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides on salt stress alleviation and seed germination. J Environ Biol. 2010;31(5):701–704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Attitalla IH. Traits biologically interacting Azospirillum lipoferum strain R23. Adv Biol Res. 2012;6(2):87–94. [Google Scholar]
  12. Babalola OO. Beneficial bacteria of agricultural importance. Biotechnol Lett. 2010;32(11):1559–1570. doi: 10.1007/s10529-010-0347-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Barbosa MAM, da Silva Lobato AK, Tan DKY, Viana GDM, Coelho KNN, Barbosa JRS, dos Santos Moraes MH, Lobo da Costa RC, dos Santos Filho BG, de Oliveira Neto CF. Bradyrhizobium improves nitrogen assimilation, osmotic adjustment and growth in contrasting cowpea cultivars under drought. Aust J Crop Sci. 2013;7(13):1983–1989. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bistgani ZE, Siadat SA, Bakhshandeh A, Pirbalouti AG, Hashemi M. Interactive effects of drought stress and chitosan application on physiological characteristics and essential oil yield of Thymus daenensis Celak. Crop J. 2017;5:407–415. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bouzid S, Rahmoune C. Enhancement of saline water for irrigation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. species in presence of molybdenum. Procedia Eng. 2012;33:168–173. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bresson J, Varoquaux F, Bontpart T, Touraine B, Vile D. The PGPR strain Phyllobacterium brassicacearum STM196 induces a reproductive delay and physiological changes that result in improved drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2013;200:558–569. doi: 10.1111/nph.12383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Calvo-Polanco M, Sanchez-Romera B, Aroca R, Asins MJ, Declerck S, Dodd IC, Martinez-Andujar C, Albacete A, Ruiz-Lozano JM. Exploring the use of recombinant inbred lines in combination with beneficial microbial inoculants (AM fungus and PGPR) to improve drought stress tolerance in tomato. Environ Exp Bot. 2016;131:47–57. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cardinale M, Ratering S, Suarez C, Montoya AMZ, Geissler-Plaum R, Schnell S. Paradox of plant growth promotion potential of rhizobacteria and their actual promotion effect on growth of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under salt stress. Microbiol Res. 2015;181:22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2015.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chaudhary D, Sindhu SS. Amelioration of salt stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by coinculation of ACC deaminase-containing rhizospheric bacteria with Mesorhizobium strains. Legume Res. 2017;40(1):80–86. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen L, Yin H, Xu J, Liu X. Enhanced antioxidative responses of a salt-resistant wheat cultivar facilitate its adaptation to salt stress. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10(74):16887–16896. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen L, Liu Y, Wu G, Njeri KV, Shen Q, Zhang N, Zhang R. Induced maize salt tolerance by rhizosphere inoculation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9. Physiol Plant. 2016;158:34–44. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Creus CM, Pereyra MA, Casanovas FM, Sueldo RJ, Barassi CA. Plant growth-promoting effects of rhizobacteria on abiotic stressed plants. Azospirillum—grasses model. Amer J Plant Sci Biotech. 2010;4(1):49–59. [Google Scholar]
  23. Cruz C, Gouveia C, Dias T, Varma A, Babalola OO. How to disentangle changes in microbial function from changes in microbial community. In: Varma A, Sharma AK, editors. Modern tools and techniques to understand microbes. Basel: Springer International Publishing AG; 2017. pp. 149–158. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cruz C, Ramos A, Babalola OO, Kamel H, Dias T, Varma A, et al. Soil: do not disturb, mycorrhiza in action. In: Varmer A, et al., editors. Mycorrhiza—function, diversity, state of the art. Basel: Springer International Publishing AG; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  25. Damam M, Gaddam B, Kausar R. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on Coleus forskohlii. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2014;3(9):266–274. [Google Scholar]
  26. Delfini R, Belgoff C, Fernández E, Fabra A, Castro S. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and nitrate reduction in two peanut cultivars with different growth habit and branching pattern structures. Plant Growth Regul. 2010;61:153–159. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dong JG, Fernandez-Maculet JC, Yang SF. Purification and characterization of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase from apple fruit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:9789–9793. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Egamberdieva D, Jabborova D, Hashem A. Pseudomonas induces salinity tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and resistance to Fusarium root rot through the modulation of indole-3-acetic acid. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2015;22:773–779. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.04.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Egamberdieva D, Wirth S, Alqarawi AA, Abd_Allah EF. Salt tolerant Methylobacterium mesophilicum showed viable colonization abilities in the plant rhizosphere. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2015;22:585–590. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.06.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ekinci M, Turan M, Yildirim E, Güneş A, Kotan R, Dursun A. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on growth, nutrient, organic acid, amino acid and hormone content of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) transplants. Acta Sci Pol Hortorum Cultus. 2014;13(6):71–85. [Google Scholar]
  31. El-Hamied SAA. Effect of multi-ingredient of Bokashi on productivity of mandarin trees and soil properties under saline water irrigation. IOSR J Agric Vet Sci (IOSR-JAVS) 2014;7(11):79–87. [Google Scholar]
  32. Esuola CO, Babalola OO, Heine T, Schwabe R, Schlomann M, Tischler D. Identification and characterization of a FAD-dependent putrescine N-hydroxylase (GorA) from Gordonia rubripertincta CWB2. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 2016;134:378–389. [Google Scholar]
  33. Fashola MO, Ngole-Jeme VM, Babalola OO. Diversity of acidophilic bacteria and archaea and their roles in bioremediation of acid mine drainage. British Microbiol Res J. 2015;8(3):443–456. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ferreira EPB, Martins LMV, Xavier GR, Rumjanek NG. Nodulation and grain yield by cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) inoculated with rhizobia, isolates. Rev Caatinga. 2011;24:27–35. [Google Scholar]
  35. Garcia JE, Maroniche G, Creus C, Suarez-Rodriguez R, Ramirez-Trujillo JA, Groppa MD. In vitro PGPR properties and osmotic tolerance of different Azospirillum native strains and their effects on growth of maize under drought stress. Microbiol Res. 2017;202:21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2017.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Glick BR, Cheng Z, Czarny J, Duan J. Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2007;119:329–339. [Google Scholar]
  37. Goswamia D, Dhandhukiab P, Patela P, Thakker JN. Screening of PGPR from saline desert of Kutch: growth promotion in Arachis hypogea by Bacillus licheniformis A2. Microbiol Res. 2014;169:66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2013.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gujral MS, Agrawal P, Khetmalas MB, Pandey R. Colonization and plant growth promotion of sorghum seedling by endorhizospheric Serratia sp. Acta Biologica Indica. 2013;2(1):343–352. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hasanah Y, Rahmawati N (2012) Soybean production under drought stress with application of Bradyrhizobium japonicum induced by genistein, The Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference Syiah Kuala University 2012 & The 8th IMT-GT Uninet Biosciences Conference Banda Aceh, 22–24 November 2012, 2(1):145–149
  40. Heidari M, Golpayegani A. Effects of water stress and inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on antioxidant status and photosynthetic pigments in basil (Ocimum basilicum L) J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2012;11(1):57–61. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hong SH, Lee EY. Phytostabilization of salt accumulated soil using plant and biofertilizers: field application. Int Biodeterior Biodegraf. 2017;124:188–195. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hong SH, Ham SY, Kim JS, Kim I-S, Lee EY. Application of sodium polyacrylate and plant growth-promoting bacterium, Micrococcaceae HW-2 on the growth of plants cultivated in the rooftop. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2016;133:297–303. [Google Scholar]
  43. Honma M, Shimomura T. Metabolism of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. Agric Biol Chem. 1978;42:1825–1831. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hosseini F, Mosaddeghi MR, Dexter AR. Effect of the fungus Piriformospora indica on physiological characteristics and root morphology of wheat under combined drought and mechanical stresses. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017;118:107–120. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Igiehon NO, Babalola OO. Biofertilizers and sustainable agriculture: exploring arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101(12):4871–4881. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8344-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Jing K, Zongping P, Min D, Gan S, Xin Z. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the drought resistance of the mining area repair plant Sainfoin. Int J Min Sci Technol. 2014;24:485–489. [Google Scholar]
  47. Jureková Z, Németh-Molnár K, Paganová V. Physiological responses of six tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cultivars to water stress. J Hort Forestry. 2011;3(10):294–300. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kapoor R, Gupta MK, Kumar N, Kanwar SS. Analysis of nhaA gene from salt tolerant and plant growth promoting Enterobacter ludwigii. Rhizosphere. 2017;4:62–69. [Google Scholar]
  49. Karlidag H, Yildirim E, Turan M, Pehluvan M, Donmez F. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria mitigate deleterious effects of salt stress on strawberry plants (Fragaria xananassa) HortScience. 2013;48(5):563–567. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kasim WA, Gaafar RM, Abou-Ali RM, Omar MN, Hewait HM. Effect of biofilm forming plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on salinity tolerance in barley. Ann Agric Sci. 2016;61(2):217–227. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kasmani MRB, Samavat S, Mostafavi M, Khalighi A. The effect of application of humic acid foliar on biochemical parameters of pistachio under drought stress. New York Sci J. 2013;6(12):26–31. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kavamura VN, Santos SN, da Silva JL, Parma MM, Ávila LA, Visconti A, Zucchi TD, Taketani RG, Andreote FD, de Melo IS. Screening of Brazilian cacti rhizobacteria for plant growth promotion under drought. Microbiol Res. 2013;168:183–191. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2012.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Keyvan S. The effects of drought stress on yield, relative water content, proline, soluble carbohydrates and chlorophyll of bread wheat cultivars. J Animal Plant Sci. 2010;8(3):1051–1060. [Google Scholar]
  54. Khan A, Sirajuddin ZXQ, Javed MT, Khan KS, Bano A, Shen RF, Masood S. Bacillus pumilus enhanced tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) to combined stresses of NaCl and high boron due to limited uptake of Na+ Environ Exp Bot. 2016;124:120–129. [Google Scholar]
  55. Khan AL, Halo BA, Elyassi A, Ali S, Al-Hosni K, Hussain J, Al-Harrasi A, Lee I. Indole acetic acid and ACC deaminase from endophytic bacteria improves the growth of Solanum lycopersicum. Eur J Biotechnol. 2016;21:58–64. [Google Scholar]
  56. Khan Z, Rho H, Firrincieli A, Hung SH, Luna V, Masciarelli O, Kim S, Doty SL. Growth enhancement and drought tolerance of hybrid poplar upon inoculation with endophyte consortia. Curr Plant Biol. 2016;6:38–47. [Google Scholar]
  57. Khan AL, Waqas M, Asaf S, Kamran M, Shahzad R, Bilal S, Khan MA, Kang S-M, Kim Y-H, Yun B-W, Al-Rawahi A, Al-Harrasi A, Lee I-J. Plant growth-promoting endophyte Sphingomonas sp. LK11 alleviates salinity stress in Solanum pimpinellifolium. Environ Exp Bot. 2017;133:58–69. [Google Scholar]
  58. Klein A, Keyster M, Ludidi N. Response of soybean nodules to exogenously applied caffeic acid during NaCl-induced salinity. South Afr J Bot. 2015;96:13–18. [Google Scholar]
  59. Kumari P, Khanna V. Biodiversity of Pseudomonas and Bacillus possessing both bioantagonistic and plant growth promoting traits in chickpea rhizosphere. Int J Sci Nat. 2016;7(1):153–158. [Google Scholar]
  60. Lastochkina O, Pusenkova L, Yuldashev R, Babaev M, Garipova S, Blagova D, Khairullin R, Aliniaeifard S. Effects of Bacillus subtilis on some physiological and biochemical parameters of Triticum aestivum L. (wheat) under salinity. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017;121:80–88. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lazzarotto P, Calanca P, Semenov M, Fuhrer J. Transient responses to increasing CO2 and climate change in an unfertilized grass–clover sward. Clim Res. 2010;41:221–232. [Google Scholar]
  62. Lei CY, Ma DM, Pu GB, Qiu XF, Du ZG, Wang H, Li GF, Ye HC, Liu BY. Foliar application of chitosan activates artemisinin biosynthesis in (Artemisia annua L.) Ind Crop Prod. 2011;33:176–182. [Google Scholar]
  63. Li H, Lei P, Pang X, Li S, Xu H, Xu Z, Feng X. Enhanced tolerance to salt stress in canola (Brassica napus L.) seedlings inoculated with the halotolerant Enterobacter cloacae HSNJ4. Appl Soil Ecol. 2017;119:26–34. [Google Scholar]
  64. Lotter D, Valentine AJ, Garderen EAV, Tadross M. Physiological responses of a fynbos legume, Aspalathus linearis to drought stress. South Afr J Bot. 2014;94:218–223. [Google Scholar]
  65. Ma Y, Rajkumar M, Zhang C, Freitas H. Inoculation of Brassica oxyrrhina with plant growth promoting bacteria for the improvement of heavy metal phytoremediation under drought conditions. J Hazard Mater. 2016;320:36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Maiti TK. A halotolerant Enterobacter sp. displaying ACC deaminase activity promotes rice seedling growth under salt stress. Res Microbiol. 2018;169(1):20–32. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2017.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Manaf HH, Zayed MS. Productivity of cowpea as affected by salt stress in presence of endomycorrhizae and Pseudomonas fluorescens. Ann Agric Sci. 2015;60(2):219–226. [Google Scholar]
  68. Martinez R, Espejo A, Sierra M, Ortiz-Bernad I, Correa D, Bedmar E, Lopez-Jurado M, Porres JM. Co-inoculation of Halomonas maura and Ensifer meliloti to improve alfalfa yield in saline soils. Appl Soil Ecol. 2015;87:81–86. [Google Scholar]
  69. Masciarelli O, Llanes A, Luna V. A new PGPR co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum enhances soybean nodulation. Microbiol Res. 2014;169:609–615. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2013.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Meher, Shivakrishna P, Ashok KR, Manohar Rao D (2017) Effect of PEG-6000 imposed drought stress on RNA content, relative water content (RWC), and chlorophyll content in peanut leaves and roots. Saudi J Biol Sci. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.04.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  71. Mengual C, Roldan A, Caravaca F, Schoebitz M. Advantages of inoculation with immobilized rhizobacteria versus amendment with olive-mill waste in the afforestation of a semiarid area with Pinus halepensis mill. Ecol Eng. 2014;73:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  72. Mengual C, Schoebitz M, Azcon R, Roldan A. Microbial inoculants and organic amendment improves plant establishment and soil rehabilitation under semiarid conditions. J Environ Manag. 2014;134:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Misra S, Dixit VK, Khan MH, Mishra SK, Dviwedi G, Yadav S, Lehri A, Chauhan PS. Exploitation of agro-climatic environment for selection of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase producing salt tolerant indigenous plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol Res. 2017;205:25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2017.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Moustaine M, Elkahkahi R, Benbouazza A, Benkirane R, Achbani EH. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacterial (PGPR) inoculation on growth in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L) and characterization for direct PGP abilities in Morocco. Int J Environ Agric Biotechnol. 2017;2(2):590–596. [Google Scholar]
  75. Nocker A, Fernández PS, Montijn R, Schuren F. Effect of air drying on bacterial viability: a multi parameter viability assessment. J Microbiol Methods. 2012;90:86–95. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Olanrewaju OS, Glick BR, Babalola OO. Mechanisms of action of plant growth promoting bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;33:197. doi: 10.1007/s11274-017-2364-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Orhan F. Alleviation of salt stress by halotolerant and halophilic plant growth-promoting bacteria in wheat (Triticum aestivum) Braz J Microbial. 2016;4(7):621–627. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Ortiz N, Armada E, Duque E, Roldan A, Azcon R. Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and/or bacteria to enhancing plant drought tolerance under natural soil conditions: effectiveness of autochthonous or allochthonous strains. J Plant Physiol. 2015;174:87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Patel S, Jinal HN, Amaresan N. Isolation and characterization of drought resistance bacteria for plant growth promoting properties and their effect on chilli (Capsicum annum) seedling under salt stress. Biocat Agric Biotechnol. 2017;12:85–89. [Google Scholar]
  80. Pathan SM, Lee J-D, Sleper DA, Fritschi FB, Sharp RE, Carter TE, Jr, Nelson RL, King CA, Schapaugh WT, Ellersieck MR, Nguyen HT, Shannon JG. Two soybean plant introductions display slow leaf wilting and reduced yield loss under drought. J Agron Crop Sci. 2014;200:231–236. [Google Scholar]
  81. Paulucci NS, Gallarato LA, Reguera YB, Vicario JC, Cesari AB, García de Lema MB, Dardanelli MS. Arachis hypogaea PGPR isolated from argentine soil modifies its lipids components in response to temperature and salinity. Microbiol Res. 2015;173:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2014.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Pereira SIA, Moreira H, Argyres K, Castro PML, Marques APGC. Promotion of sunflower growth under saline water irrigation by the inoculation of beneficial microorganisms. Appl Soil Ecol. 2016;105:36–47. [Google Scholar]
  83. Pereyra MA, Garcia P, Colabelli MN, Barassi CA, Creus CM. A better water status in wheat seedlings induced by Azospirillum under osmotic stress in related to morphological changes in xylem vessels of the coleoptile. Appl Soil Ecol. 2012;53:94–97. [Google Scholar]
  84. Qurashi AW, Sabri AN. Bacterial exopolysaccharide and biofilm formation stimulate chickpea growth and soil aggregation under salt stress. Braz J Microbiol. 2012;11:83–91. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838220120003000046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Saakre M, Baburao TM, Salim AP, Ffancies RM, Achuthan VP, Thomas G, Sivarajan SR. Identification and characterization of genes responsible for drought tolerance in rice mediated by Pseudomonas Fluorescens. Rice Sci. 2017;24(5):291–298. [Google Scholar]
  86. Saleem AR, Bangash N, Mahmood T, Khalid A, Centritto M, Siddique MT. Rhizobacteria capable of producing ACC deaminase promote growth of velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens) under water stress condition. Int J Agric Biol. 2015;17:663–667. [Google Scholar]
  87. Sapre S, Gontia-Mishra I, Tiwari S. Klebsiella sp. confers enhanced tolerance to salinity and plant growth promotion in oat seedlings (Avena sativa) Microbiol Res. 2018;206:25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2017.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Sarkar A, Ghosh PK, Pramanik K, Mitra S, Soren T, Pandey S, Mondal MH, Maiti TK (2018) A halotolerant Enterobacter sp. displaying ACC deaminase activity promotes rice seedling growth under salt stress. Res Microbiol 169:20–32. [DOI] [PubMed]
  89. Schoebitz M, Mengual C, Roldan A. Combined effects of clay immobilized Azospirillum brasilense and Pantoea dispera and organic olive residue on plant performance and soil properties in the revegetation of a semiarid area. Sci Total Environ. 2014;466-467:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Shabani GH, Ardakani MR, Chaichi MR, Friede JK, Khavazi K. Effect of different fertilizing treatments on nutrient uptake in annual medic (Medicago scutellata cv. Robinson) under irrigated and dry farming systems. J Agric Sci Technol. 2015;17:299–310. [Google Scholar]
  91. Shaddad MAK, Abd El- Samad HM, Mostafa D. Role of gibberellic acid (GA3) in improving salt stress tolerance of two wheat cultivars. Int J Plant Physiol Biochem. 2013;5(4):50–57. [Google Scholar]
  92. Shah G, Jan M, Afreen M, Anees M, Rehman S, Daud MK, Malook I, Jamil M. Halophilic bacteria mediated phytoremediation of salt-affected soils cultivated with rice. J Geochem Explor. 2017;174:59–65. [Google Scholar]
  93. Sobti S, Belhadj HA, Djaghoubi A. Isolation and characterization of the native rhizobia under hyper-salt edaphic conditions in Ouargla (Southeast Algeria) Energy Procedia. 2015;74:1434–1439. [Google Scholar]
  94. St Clair SB, Lynch J. The opening of Pandora's box: climate change impacts on soil fertility and crop nutrition in developing countries. Plant Soil. 2010;335:101–115. [Google Scholar]
  95. Stajkovic-Srbinovic O, Delic D, Kuzumanovic D, Protic N, Rasulic N, Knezevic-Vukcevic J. Growth and nutrient uptake in oat and barley plants as affected by rhizobacteria. Romanian Biotechnol Lett. 2014;19(3):9429–9436. [Google Scholar]
  96. Staudinger C, Mehmeti-Tershani V, Gil-Quintana E, Gonzalez EM, Hofhans F, Bachmann G, Wienkoop S. Evidence for a rhizobia-induced drought stress response strategy in Medicago truncatula. J Proteome. 2016;136:202–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Suarez C, Cardinale M, Ratering S, Steffens D, Jung S, Montoya ZMA, Geissler-Plaum R, Schnell S. Plant growth-promoting effects of Hartmannibacter diazotrophicus on summer barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under salt stress. Appl Soil Ecol. 2015;95:23–30. [Google Scholar]
  98. Szyma’nskaa S, Płociniczak T, Piotrowska-Seget Z, Złocha M, Ruppel S, Hrynkiewicz K. Metabolic potential and community structure of endophytic and rhizosphere bacteria associated with the roots of the halophyte Aster tripolium L. Microbiol Res. 2016;182:68–79. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2015.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Tak HI, Ahmad F, Babalola OO. Review of environmental contamination and toxicology. New York: Springer; 2013. Advances in the application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in phytoremediation of heavy metals; pp. 33–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Tint AMM, Sarobo E, Nakasathein S, Chai-aree W. Differential responses of selected soybean cultivars to drought stress and their drought tolerant attributions. Kasetsart J (Nat Sci) 2011;45:571–582. [Google Scholar]
  101. Tiwari S, Lata C, Chauhan PS, Nautiyal CS. Pseudomonas putida attunes morphophysiological, biochemical and molecular responses in Cicer arietinum L. during drought stress and recovery. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;99:108–117. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Vacheron J, Renoud S, Muller D, Babalola OO, Prigent-Combaret C, et al. Alleviation of abiotic and biotic stresses in plants by Azospirillum. In: Cassain FD, et al., editors. Handbook for Azospirillum, Technical issues and protocol. Basel: Springer International Publishing; 2015. pp. 333–365. [Google Scholar]
  103. Vladimir R. The influence of Rhizobacteria and phosphorus supply on nitrogen and phosphorus contents in soybean under insufficiency moisture of soil. Lucrări Ştiinţifice. 2012;55(2):59–62. [Google Scholar]
  104. Vurukonda SSKP, Vardharajula S, Shrivastava M, Skz A. Enhancement of drought stress tolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol Res. 2016;184:13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2015.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Vurukonda SSKP, Vardharajula S, Shrivastava M, Skz A. Multifunctional Pseudomonas putida strain FBKV2 from arid rhizosphere soil and its growth promotional effects on maize under drought stress. Rhizosphere. 2016;1:4–13. [Google Scholar]
  106. Wang S, Kurepa J, Hashimoto T, Smalle JA. Salt stress-induced disassembly of Arabidopsis cortical microtubule arrays involves 26S proteasome-dependent degradation of Spiral1. Plant Cell. 2011;23:3412–3427. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.089920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Wu Z, Peng Y, Guo L, Li C. Root colonization of encapsulated Klebsiella oxytoca Rs-5 on cotton plants and its promoting growth performance under salinity stress. Eur J Soil Biol. 2014;60:81–87. [Google Scholar]
  108. Yanni Y, Zidan M, Dazzo F, Rizk R, Mehesen A, Abdelfattah F, Elsadany A. Enhanced symbiotic performance and productivity of drought stressed common bean after inoculation with tolerant native rhizobia in extensive fields. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2016;232:119–128. [Google Scholar]
  109. Yolcu H, Turan M, Lithourgidis A, Çakmakçi R, Ali KOÇ. Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and manure on yield and quality characteristics of Italian ryegrass under semi-arid conditions. Aust J Crop Sci. 2011;5(13):1730–1736. [Google Scholar]
  110. Zain NAM, Ismail MR. Effects of potassium rates and types on growth, leaf gas exchange and biochemical changes in rice (Oryza sativa) planted under cyclic water stress. Agric Water Manag. 2016;164:83–90. [Google Scholar]
  111. Zhang M, Fang Y, Ji Y, Jiang Z, Wang L. Effects of salt stress on ion content, antioxidant enzymes and protein profile in different tissues of Broussonetia papyrifera. South Afr J Bot. 2013;85:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  112. Zhu F, Qu L, Hong X, Sun X (2011) Isolation and characterization of a phosphate solubilizing halophilic bacterium Kushneria sp. YCWA 18 from Daqiao saltern on the coast of yellow sea of China. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 615032. 10.1155/2011/615032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES