Skip to main content
JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques logoLink to JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques
. 2017 Mar 8;7(1):e7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00063

Arthroscopic Reconstruction After Acute Acromioclavicular Separation Injuries

Marvin Minkus 1, Natascha Kraus 1, Carmen Hann 1, Markus Scheibel 1,a
PMCID: PMC6132590  PMID: 30233942

Abstract

Acute acromioclavicular (AC)-joint dislocations are common injuries of the shoulder girdle. Surgical repair is indicated for acute high-grade (Rockwood types IV, V, and VI) AC-joint injuries. The best treatment for type III is still controversial, but young and active patients with this type of injury might benefit from a surgical AC-joint stabilization. Surgery should be performed within the first 3 weeks after the injury since the biological healing potential decreases with time. Acute AC-joint separation is diagnosed by clinical examination and radiography. Vertical translation anteroposterior stress views with a 10-kg load are used to grade the injuries. Bilateral lateral stress (Alexander) views are used to evaluate dynamic horizontal translation qualitatively.

Arthroscopic techniques for AC reconstruction have become more popular in recent years because they are minimally invasive; they allow treatment of concomitant glenohumeral lesions; and they can be performed in one step, with insertion of implants that do not have to be removed later. The arthroscopically assisted double-button technique with an additional AC cerclage was developed to stabilize the AC joint by internal bracing of the torn ligaments.

The procedure consists of the following steps. Step 1: With the patient in the beach-chair position, a 2-cm incision is made on top of the clavicle and posterior and lateral viewing portals as well as an anteroinferior working portal are created. Step 2: With the arthroscope in the lateral portal, the subcoracoid bursa and the base of the coracoid are dissected with a radiofrequency ablation device through the anteroinferior portal. Step 3: Coracoclavicular drilling is done with use of a drill guide and under arthroscopic and image-intensifier control. After overdrilling of the Kirschner wires, Nitinol suture passers are introduced and retrieved via the anteroinferior portal. Step 4: Transclavicular and transacromial drill-holes are established for the AC cerclage. Step 5: The 2 double-button devices are attached to the Nitinol suture passers, and the inferior buttons are shuttled through the clavicle and coracoid and then placed parallel to the coracoid base. Step 6: The sutures are tightened, and an anatomical vertical reduction of the AC joint is achieved. Step 7: A triangular acromioclavicular nonabsorbable cerclage tape is used for horizontal stabilization. Step 8: The clavicular incision is closed in 2 layers, including the repair of the deltotrapezoidal fascia and the arthroscopic portals, in a standard fashion.

The combined arthroscopically-assisted and image-intensifier-controlled double-button technique with an additional AC cerclage is a safe procedure that enables an anatomical reduction of the AC joint and yields good to excellent clinical results.


Download video file (2.5MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00063.vid1
Download video file (5.6MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00063.vid2
Download video file (2.6MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00063.vid3
Download video file (16.8MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00063.vid4
Download video file (8.7MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00063.vid5
Download video file (27.5MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00063.vid6
Download video file (17.6MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00063.vid7
Download video file (11.3MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00063.vid8
Download video file (8MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00063.vid9
Download video file (11.2MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00063.vid10
Download video file (6.4MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00063.vid11
Download video file (1.5MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00063.vid12
Download video file (7.8MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00063.vid13
Download video file (1.8MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00063.vid14

Footnotes

Published outcomes of this procedure can be found at: Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1507-16, J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jun;22(6):760-6, and Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Oct;133(10):1431-40

Disclosure: On the Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms, which are provided with the online version of the article, one of the authors checked “yes” to indicate that the author received payment or services from a third party (Arthrex) for an aspect of the submitted work.

References

  • 1. Alexander OM. Radiography of the acromioclavicular articulation. Med Radiogr Photogr. 1954;30(2):34-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987. January;214:160-4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gilbart MK, Gerber C. Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007. Nov-Dec;16(6):717-21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Gerhardt C, Kraus N, Pauly S, Scheibel M. [Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute injury to the acromioclavicular joint with the double TightRope™ technique: one-year results]. Unfallchirurg. 2013. February;116(2):125-30. German. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Hann C, Kraus N, Minkus M, Maziak N, Scheibel M. Arthroscopically-assisted coraco- and acromioclavicular stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations. Unpublished data. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6. Hedtmann A, Fett H, Ludwig J. [Management of old neglected posttraumatic acromioclavicular joint instability and arthrosis]. Orthopade. 1998. August;27(8):556-66. German. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Jensen G, Katthagen JC, Alvarado LE, Lill H, Voigt C. Has the arthroscopically assisted reduction of acute AC joint separations with the double Tight-Rope technique advantages over the clavicular hook plate fixation? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014. February;22(2):422-30. Epub 2012 Nov 4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kraus N, Haas NP, Scheibel M, Gerhardt C. Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations in a coracoclavicular double-TightRope technique: V-shaped versus parallel drill hole orientation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013. October;133(10):1431-40. Epub 2013 Jul 11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kraus N, Scheibel M. [Treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint instability with modern reconstruction procedures]. Unfallchirurg. 2012. October;115(10):872-8. German. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pauly S, Kraus N, Greiner S, Scheibel M. Prevalence and pattern of glenohumeral injuries among acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint instabilities. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013. June;22(6):760-6. Epub 2012 Sep 28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Rockwood CA. Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP, editors. Fractures in adults. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1984. p 860-910. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Scheibel M, Dröschel S, Gerhardt C, Kraus N. Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations. Am J Sports Med. 2011. July;39(7):1507-16. Epub 2011 Mar 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Taft TN, Wilson FC, Oglesby JW. Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. An end-result study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987. September;69(7):1045-51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Venjakob AJ, Salzmann GM, Gabel F, Buchmann S, Walz L, Spang JT, Vogt S, Imhoff AB. Arthroscopically assisted 2-bundle anatomic reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations: 58-month findings. Am J Sports Med. 2013. March;41(3):615-21. Epub 2013 Jan 31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES