Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2018 May 2;12(2):269–272. doi: 10.1007/s12104-018-9821-8

NMR 1H,13C, 15N backbone and 13C side chain resonance assignment of the G12C mutant of human K-Ras bound to GDP

Alok K Sharma 1, Seung-Joo Lee 1, Alan C Rigby 1, Sharon A Townson 1,
PMCID: PMC6132845  PMID: 29721757

Abstract

K-Ras is a key driver of oncogenesis, accounting for approximately 80% of Ras-driven human cancers. The small GTPase cycles between an inactive, GDP-bound and an active, GTP-bound state, regulated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors and GTPase activating proteins, respectively. Activated K-Ras regulates cell proliferation, differentiation and survival by signaling through several effector pathways, including Raf-MAPK. Oncogenic mutations that impair the GTPase activity of K-Ras result in a hyperactivated state, leading to uncontrolled cellular proliferation and tumorogenesis. A cysteine mutation at glycine 12 is commonly found in K-Ras associated cancers, and has become a recent focus for therapeutic intervention. We report here 1HN, 15N, and 13C resonance assignments for the 19.3 kDa (aa 1–169) human K-Ras protein harboring an oncogenic G12C mutation in the GDP-bound form (K-RASG12C-GDP), using heteronuclear, multidimensional NMR spectroscopy. Backbone 1H–15N correlations have been assigned for all non-proline residues, except for the first methionine residue.

Keywords: Ras family, K-Ras, Cell proliferation, G12C, Cancer, HSQC, NMR

Biological context

Ras GTPases play a critical role in regulating pathways involved in cell growth, proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis (Hunter et al. 2014; Ostrem et al. 2013). The activity of Ras is modulated by inter-conversion between an inactive, GDP-bound state and an active, GTP-bound state, which is tightly regulated by numerous proteins including guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) (Pylayeva-Gupta et al. 2011). Approximately 20–30% of human tumors are attributed to somatic mutations in Ras proteins (Downward 2003). Oncogenic mutations at positions 12, 13, or 61 attenuate the GTPase activity of Ras resulting in uncontrolled functional hyperactivation. Elevated levels of active Ras in turn contribute to several aspects of malignant phenotypes, leading to cancer. Amongst the three Ras isoforms (K-Ras, H-Ras, and N-Ras), oncogenic mutations are more frequently observed in K-Ras and are estimated to account for over 80% of all Ras-driven cancers (Prior et al. 2012). In particular, K-Ras harboring a cysteine mutation at position 12 is commonly found in K-Ras associated cancers, including lung, pancreatic, and colorectal adenocarcinomas (Stephen et al. 2014; Prior et al. 2012), and has become a target for therapeutic intervention using cysteine-reactive covalent small molecule inhibitors (Janes et al. 2018; Prior et al. 2012; Ostrem et al. 2013).

K-Ras contains a guanosine nucleotide-binding domain (G domain of ~ 20 kDa) at the N-terminus and a short hypervariable region at the C-terminus. Several regions within the G domain are particularly important for nucleotide exchange and downstream signalling, including the P-loop (residues 10–17) that binds nucleotide phosphate, as well as the Switch I (25–40) and Switch II (57–75) regions that interact directly with GEFs (Boriack-Sjodin et al. 1998) and effector proteins, such as Raf and RalGDS (Downward 2003). Analysis of the protein NMR assignments of GTP- and GDP-bound forms of wild-type (WT) K-Ras reveal major differences in residues in the G domain, localized within the P-loop, Switch I and Switch II regions (Vo et al. 2013; Boriack-Sjodin et al. 1998; Downward 2003). For GTP-bound Ras, local polysterism and conformational exchange render residues in the aforementioned regions undetectable in the fingerprint region of the 2D 1H–15N HSQC spectrum under physiological conditions (Ito et al. 1997; O’Connor and Kovrigin 2012). In contrast, residues in the entire G domain are observed in the 2D 1H–15N HSQC spectrum of GDP-bound Ras (Muto et al. 1993; Gossert et al. 2011; Vo et al. 2013; Smith et al. 2013). Backbone assignments of WT K-Ras are available for aa 1–166 (Vo et al. 2013) and aa 1–180 (Gossert et al. 2011; although a number of residues were undetected in their 2D 1H–15N HSQC spectrum).

Despite the growing interest in K-Ras G12C as a therapeutic target, no assignments have been reported for this oncogenic mutant in either the GDP- or GTP-bound state. Here we present the 1H,13C,15N backbone NMR assignment of the GDP-bound form of G12C K-Ras (K-RasG12C-GDP), encompassing residues 1–169, at pH 7.0. Under these solution conditions all the backbone amide signals were observed. Chemical shift differences in the 2D 1H–15N HSQC spectra of the GDP-bound forms of WT K-Ras (Vo et al. 2013) and of G12C mutant K-Ras (this study) are discussed.

Methods and experiments

Protein expression and purification

DNA encoding residues 1–169 of K-Ras4BG12C was sub-cloned into a pET28a vector with a N-terminal hexa-histidine (6-His) tag followed by the TEV protease cleavage site. Protein was expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) cells (Novagen), and induced by IPTG at the optical cell density between 0.5 and 0.7. IPTG-induced cells were grown at 30 °C for 16 h. Proteins uniformly labeled with 15N or 13C/15N were prepared by growing E. coli cells in minimal media containing 15NH4Cl (1 g/l) or 13C6 glucose (2 g/l)/15NH4Cl (1 g/l) (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories; CIL) supplemented with Bio-Express 1000 (CIL) using the identical protocol used for LB media. Harvested cells were suspended in Buffer A (50 mM Tris, 500 mM NaCl, 10% Glycerol, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM TCEP, pH 8.0) supplemented with complete protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (Roche) and lysonase (Novagen) (10 μl/l cell culture), agitated 30 min at 4 °C, and sonicated (Branson digital sonifier, S-450D) at 4 °C, 7 × 7 s cycles at 35% amplitude with 1 min on ice between cycles. Supernatant lysate was loaded onto pre-equilibrated (in Buffer A) Ni-NTA column (Qiagen). After 1 h of mixing the lysate, beads were washed 20 column volume (cv) in Buffer B (50 mM Tris, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 1 mM TCEP, pH 8.0). Protein was eluted in Buffer C (50 mM Tris, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole, 1 mM TCEP, pH 8.0). Ni-NTA purified protein was dialyzed in Buffer D (50 mM Tris, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM TCEP, pH 8.0) and digested with TEV protease at 4 °C overnight. Tagless protein incorporating a Ser residue at the N-terminus (due to cloning exigencies) was recovered by passing through a Ni-NTA column. Purified protein, as detected by Coomassie Blue Staining after SDS-PAGE, was a single band of ~ 19 kDa with apparent purity of > 96%. Protein was further purified by size exclusion chromatography on a Superdex 75 column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated in buffer E (50 mM Tris, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM TCEP, pH 8.0). The GDP-bound state of the purified protein was ascertained by HPLC.

NMR spectroscopy

NMR samples of 13C/15N- and 15N labeled K-RasG12C-GDP (0.5–0.6 mM) were prepared in a 93% H2O/7% D2O solvent composition containing 50 mM TRIS-d11, 1 mM TCEP-d16, 1 mM MgCl2, 100 µM 2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentanesulfonic acid (DSS) as internal standard, and 0.05% (w/v) NaN3 to avoid any unwanted bacterial growth over time. All NMR experiments were performed at 298 K on a Bruker Avance 800 MHz spectrometer equipped with a 5-mm TCI cryoprobe. NMR data were acquired in the gradient-selected sensitivity-enhanced mode. Backbone 1H, 15N, 13Cα, 13Cβ, and 13CO assignments were carried out using double and triple resonance experiments of 2D 1H–15N HSQC, 2D 1H–15N TROSY, HNCACB, HN(CO)CACB, HNCA, HN(CO)CA, CC(CO)NH, and HNCO (Sattler et al. 1999). These NMR data were processed on an Intel PC workstation running Redhat Linux 7.1 using NMRPipe/NMRDraw (Delaglio et al. 1995). The 1H, 13C, and 15N chemical shifts were referenced to the internal standard DSS using IUPAC-IUB recommended protocols (http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu/ref_info/cshift.html). All NMR spectra were visualized and analyzed using CCPNMR analysis (Vranken et al. 2005).

Assignments and data deposition

The assignment of 1HN, 13C, and 15N chemical shifts of human K-RasG12C-GDP has been deposited into BMRB (http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu/) with accession number 27387. Crosspeaks in the 2D 1H–15N HSQC spectrum demonstrates that the protein is well-folded in solution under the chosen condition (Fig. 1), and a total of 164 out of 165 non-proline 1H–15N correlation crosspeaks (99.4%) have been identified and assigned. The amide signal belonging to the first methionine residue could not be visualized presumably due to the exchange of 1HN protons with the bulk solvent. The chemical shifts of 13Cα, 13Cβ, and 13C′ for all residues (including the Met1 and the 4 proline residues) are assigned using the triple resonance data. Residues Gly13 and Lys16 show the most downfield-shifted 1HN chemical shifts, a pattern also seen for GDP-bound WT K-Ras (Vo et al. 2013) and for GDP-bound H-RasG12V. Due to the cysteine substitution at position 12 the 1HN chemical shift of Gly13 is further downfield shifted to its WT counterpart (Vo et al. 2013). Although the chemical shift dispersion of residue crosspeaks in the 2D 1H–15N HSQC spectra of WT and G12C K-Ras is apparently similar, the notable differences in the chemical shifts are observed for select residues. The most significant is the 15N chemical shift of the residue 12 (120 ppm in the G12C vs. 106.7 ppm in the WT) (Vo et al. 2013). Other residues which experience notable mutation-induced changes in the 1H–15N correlation chemical shift are Gly13, His27, Val44, Gly48, Ala66, Gly77, Thr87, and His94. The differences in peak positions of Gly48 and Gly77 could be due to their aliasing in 15N dimension. C-terminal residues Arg164, Lys165, and His167 also show significant changes in their peak positions in 2D 1H–15N HSQC spectrum of G12C to that of WT counterpart (Vo et al. 2013).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Two-dimensional 1H–15N HSQC spectrum illustrating the assigned residues from a ~ 0.5–0.6 mM 13C/15N K-RasG12C-GDP sample in 50 mM TRIS-d11, 1 mM TCEP-d16, 1 mM MgCl2, 100 µM DSS in 93% H2O and 7% D2O, pH 7.0 at 298K. Spectrum was recorded on a Bruker Avance 800 MHz spectrometer at 298 K. The assignments shown are annotated using the one letter amino acid code followed by the sequence number of that residue. Unassigned side-chain N–H correlations belong to Asn and Gln (connected by horizontal lines) and Arg. Residues highlighted in yellow are not seen in GTP bound form of K-RasG12C-GMPPNP (unpublished data)

The study presented herein has two experimental differences compared to the study of WT protein (Vo et al. 2013). First, the current study (K-RasG12C; 1–169) uses a construct which is 3 residues longer at C-terminus than WT K-Ras (1–166). Second, while the NMR assignment reported for WT K-Ras used a perdeuterated sample, non-deuterated NMR samples were used in this study to yield high-resolution NMR data and completion of unambiguous NMR assignments.

Extent of assignment

In total, assignments were made for 95.5% of the backbone resonances, including 1HN, 15N, 13Cα, and 13Cβ. 99.4% of non-proline backbone 1H–15N correlation crosspeaks were assigned (1H–15N correlation crosspeak for Met1 is not seen in 2D 1H–15N TROSY spectrum). Side-chain 13C assignments were achieved for 224 out of possible 269 aliphatic carbon resonances (including 95.9% of 13Cβ assignments). 100% of 13Cα, 98.8% of 13Cβ (crosspeaks not seen for Ser17 and Thr158), and 96.5% of 13CO resonances were assigned unambiguously. A chemical shift index (CSI) v 3.0 (Hafsa et al. 2015; Berjanskii and Wishart 2005) consensus for the 13Cα, 13Cβ, and 13C′ atoms suggest that the K-RASG12C-GDP conformation comprises a mixed distribution of α helix and β sheet secondary structures (Fig. 2). A total of 62% residues are engaged in constituting 11 canonical secondary structural elements that are arranged in the order of β1–α1–β2–β3–α2–β4–α3–β5–α4–β6–α5, and match well with the secondary structure order observed in the GDP-bound crystal structure of K-Ras G12C (Hunter et al. 2014). The lengths of the secondary structure segments deduced from CSI are in good agreement with those noted in the three-dimensional structural fold generated using CS-Rosetta (Shen et al. 2008).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The consensus chemical shift index (1Hα, 13Cα, 13Cβ, 13C′, 15N, 1HN) versus residue number plot of K-RasG12C-GDP showing β-strands (represented by bars with CSI value of − 1) and α-helices (represented by bars with CSI value of 1)

In conclusion, we present the backbone NMR assignment of GDP-bound K-Ras harboring an oncogenic cysteine mutation at site 12. Efforts are underway to collect additional NMR data to complete all the side-chain resonances of KRasG12C-GDP.

Acknowledgements

All NMR experiments were performed at Brandeis University NMR facility on a Bruker spectrometer of 800 MHz equipped with cryoprobe.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Berjanskii MV, Wishart DS. A simple method to predict protein flexibility using secondary chemical shifts. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:14970–14971. doi: 10.1021/ja054842f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boriack-Sjodin PA, Margarit SM, Bar-Sagi D, Kuriyan J. The structural basis of the activation of Ras by Sos. Nature. 1998;394(6691):337–343. doi: 10.1038/28548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A. NMR pipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR. 1995;6:277–293. doi: 10.1007/BF00197809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Downward J. Targeting Ras signalling pathways in cancer therapy. Nature Rev Cancer. 2003;3(1):11–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gossert AD, Hiller S, Fernández C. Automated NMR resonance assignment of large proteins for protein-ligand interaction studies. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:210–213. doi: 10.1021/ja108383x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hafsa NE, Arndt D, Wishart DS. CSI 3.0: a web server for identifying secondary and super-secondary structure in proteins using NMR chemical shifts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:W370-W377. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hunter JC, Gurbani D, Ficarro SB, Carrasco MA, Lim SM, Choi HG, Xie T, Marto JA, Chen Z, Gray NS, Westover KD. In situ selectivity profiling and crystal structure of SML-8-73-1, an active site inhibitor of oncogenic K-Ras G12C. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:8895–8900. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404639111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ito Y, Yamasaki K, Iwahara J, Terada T, Kamiya A, Shirouzu M, Muto Y, Kawai G, Yokoyama S, Laue ED, Wälchli M, Shibata T, Nishimura S, Miyazawa T. Regional polysterism in the GTP-bound form of the human c-Ha-Ras protein. Biochemistry. 1997;36(30):9109–9119. doi: 10.1021/bi970296u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Janes MR, Zhang J, Li LS, Hansen R, Peters U, Guo X, Chen Y, Babbar A, Firdaus SJ, Darjania L, Feng J, Chen JH, Li S, Li S, Long YO, Thach C, Liu Y, Zarieh A, Ely T, Kucharski JM, Kessler LV, Wu T, Yu K, Wang Y, Yao Y, Deng X, Zarrinkar PP, Brehmer D, Dhanak D, Lorenzi MV, Hu-Lowe D, Patricelli MP, Ren P, Liu Y. Targeting KRAS mutant cancers with a covalent G12C-specific inhibitor. Cell. 2018;172(3):578–589. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Muto Y, Yamasaki K, Ito Y, Yajima S, Masaki H, Uozumi T, Wa¨lchli M, Nishimura S, Miyazawa T, Yokoyama S. Sequence specific 1H and 15 N resonance assignments and secondary structure of GDP-bound human c-Ha-Ras protein in solution. J Biomol NMR. 1993;3:165–184. doi: 10.1007/BF00178260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. O’Connor C, Kovrigin EL. Assignments of backbone 1H, 13C and 15N resonances in H-Ras (1–166) complexed with GppNHp at physiological pH. Biomol NMR Assign. 2012;6:91–93. doi: 10.1007/s12104-011-9332-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ostrem JM, Peters U, Sos ML, Wells JA, Shokat KM. K-Ras(G12C) inhibitors allosterically control GTP affinity and effector interactions. Nature. 2013;503(7477):548–551. doi: 10.1038/nature12796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Prior IA, Lewis PD, Mattos C. A comprehensive survey of Ras mutations in cancer. Cancer Res. 2012;72:2457–2467. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pylayeva-Gupta Y, Grabocka E, Bar-Sagi D. Ras oncogenes: weaving a tumorigenic web. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:761–774. doi: 10.1038/nrc3106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sattler M, Schleucher J, Griesinger C. Heteronuclear multidimensional NMR methods for the structure determination of proteins in solution employing pulsed field gradients. Prog NMR Spectrosc. 1999;34:93–158. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6565(98)00025-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shen Y, Lange O, Delaglio F, Rossi P, Aramini JM, Liu G, Eletsky A, Wu Y, Singarapu KK, Lemak A, Ignatchenko A, Arrowsmith CH, Szyperski T, Montelione GT, Baker D, Bax A. Consistent blind protein structure generation from NMR chemical shift data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:4685–4690. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800256105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Smith MJ, Neel BG, Ikura M. NMR-based functional profiling of RASopathies and oncogenic RAS mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:4574–4579. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218173110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stephen AG, Esposito D, Bagni RK, McCormick F. Dragging ras back in the ring. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:272–281. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vo U, Embrey KJ, Breeze AL, Golovanov AP. 1H, 13C, and 15N resonance assignment for the human K-Ras at physiological pH. Biomol NMR Assign. 2013;7:215–219. doi: 10.1007/s12104-012-9413-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vranken WF, Boucher W, Stevens TJ, Fogh RH, Pajon A, Llinas M, Ulrich EL, Markley JL, Ionides J, Laue ED. The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline. Proteins. 2005;59:687–696. doi: 10.1002/prot.20449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biomolecular Nmr Assignments are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES