Abstract
The focus of this review is the basic methodology for applications of static deuteron NMR for studies of dynamics in the side chains of proteins. We review experimental approaches for the measurements of static line shapes and relaxation rates as well as signal enhancement strategies using the multiple echo acquisition scheme. Further, we describe computational strategies for modeling jump and diffusive motions underlying experimental data. Applications are chosen from studies of amyloid fibrils comprising the amyloid-β protein.
Keywords: static 2H NMR, solid-state NMR, deuterium, motions, side-chains dynamics
1. General overview of the technique, advantages, and disadvantages
Static 2H solid-state NMR has been known for decades as a sensitive tool for studies of the dynamics in systems ranging from polymers to peptides, nucleic acids, and proteins.(1–17)
Experiments are relatively easy to conduct over a broad temperature range and do not require microcrystals, assuming that the protein structure is maintained in the amorphous powders. In addition, the solid phase permits investigations of the effect of solvation. The major disadvantage/difficulty is the need for the selective-site labeling of the samples to obtain site-specific information (thus often requiring multiple samples) and inherent low sensitivity of the technique.
Deuterium has a spin of 1 and hence the main interaction governing deuteron NMR stems from the quadrupolar mechanism, i.e. interaction between the nuclear electric quadrupole moment and the electric field gradient (EFG). Thus, one gets a relatively simple system in terms of the spin degree of freedom. In most cases, the effect of the proton dipolar network is minor; thus, one can focus on the details of the molecular motions in which the nucleus is participating. Further, the magnitude of the electric quadrupole moment is relatively small compared with what is found for common half-integer quadrupolar nuclei and the 14N nucleus with a spin of 1, leading to a relatively narrow spectrum that is easy to work with experimentally.
The goal of this review is to provide the methodological background for the most common 2H static NMR techniques for the determination of the side-chain dynamics in proteins. It will cover the acquisition and analysis of line shapes and relaxation data and their interpretation using examples of motional modeling approaches.
2. Introduction to the theoretical basis of the effect
Details of the theoretical/computational basis have been described in numerous works over the past 50–60 years.(1, 2, 18–20) Here, brief overviews are presented for the line shape and relaxation experiments.
The quadrupolar Hamiltonian for a spin I = 1 system in a static magnetic field using the high field approximation and in the principal axis system of the EFG tensor is given by(2, 21)
in which eQ is the electric quadrupole moment of the nuclei and eq is the largest component of the EFG. The quadrupolar coupling constant is given by and represents the asymmetry of the tensor, defined to lie in the interval 0 ≤η ≤1 with |qzz| ≥ |qyy| ≥ |qxx|.
For a given orientation of a crystallite, the time-domain response of the system M(t) = M+(t)+ M−(t) in a quadrupolar echo (QE) deuterium line shape experiment is governed by
| (1) |
where ± corresponds to the m=−1 to m=0 and m=0 to m=+1 transitions of the deuteron spin. The response depends on the quadrupolar tensor orientation for each spin in the crystal-fixed frame and on the orientation of the crystallite in the laboratory frame. When the orientations of the deuteron EFG tensors in the crystal-fixed frame are specified by N “structural sites”, i.e. N sets of three Euler angles, and the deuteron dynamics are described by Markovian jumps among sites, M becomes a multidimensional vector with the components Mi (i =1, ..., N) and A takes the form of an N × N matrix with the elements
| (2) |
where i and j denote structural sites, ωi is the orientation-dependent frequency of each site, δ is a Kronecker symbol, and K is a matrix of site-exchange rates (which does not depend on crystallite orientations). The matrix K satisfies the following two constraints, , and the microscopic reversibility condition given by , where is the equilibrium population of site i and Kij is the rate of jumps from site j to site i. The orientation dependence of the frequencies ωi can be expressed by
| (3) |
where D(2) are the second-order Wigner rotation matrices defining the transformations from the principal axis frame (PAS) of the quadrupolar tensor to the crystal-fixed frame with the relative orientations given by the Euler angles ΩPC,i and from the crystal-fixed frame to the laboratory frame with the relative orientations given by the Euler angles ΩCL. In a polycrystalline sample, the line shape is the average over all possible orientations:
| (4) |
The Zeeman T1Z and quadrupolar order T1Q relaxation rates are given by the following expressions in the Redfield approximation:(2, 22)
| (5a) |
| (5b) |
where ω0 is the Larmor frequency and J1 and J2 are the spectral density functions. J1 and J2 are dependent on the time scales and types of the underlying motional processes as well as on the crystallite orientations. The dependence on the crystallite orientation is unique for each motional model and thus the anisotropies in the relaxation rates can be useful in discriminating among several motional models. The spectral density functions can be obtained analytically for several simple models of motion.(19) However, motional models with multiple modes usually require computer simulations.
In some systems, the relaxation decays M(t) are non-exponential due to the presence of conformers with different underlying motional parameters. Approaches have to be developed to interpret such decays. One useful phenomenological function for characterizing non-exponentiality is given by the so-called “stretch-exponential” of the form(23, 24)
| (6) |
where M(t) is the signal intensity, is the effective relaxation time, and β is the parameter that reflects the degree of non-exponentiality, 0 < β ≤ 1. β less than 1 corresponds to non-exponential behavior.
3. Sample preparation of the peptide and protein samples
Sample preparation is usually guided by the necessity to introduce site-specific labels to obtain residue-specific information with this technique. The most common route is solid-state peptide synthesis, with modern capabilities to about 120 residues in length,(25) and protein expression with media enhancement strategies to label selective residue types.(26) For hydration dependence studies, water is often reintroduced by either vapor diffusion or pipetting the desired amount directly into lyophilized powder. The latter approach permits the use of deuterium-depleted water to avoid the NMR signal arising from HOD. For protein sizes between 30 to 70 amino acids, it is usually necessary to obtain 10 to 25 mg of material for a satisfactory signal. Thus, containers of at least 4 mm in cross-section/diameter are usually required. Other site-specific techniques such as magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR are necessary to confirm the integrity of the sample structure under these conditions.
4. Static solid-state NMR probes
Optimal probe/console performance optimization for these types of measurements boils down to two major factors: power handling to withstand the 2 μs 90° pulses necessary to cover the full-width powder pattern and the minimization of the acoustical ring-down to 20–30 μs beyond which signal loss due to transverse relaxation becomes pronounced (an example is shown in Figure 1). If a wide temperature range is desired for the measurements, as is often the case for detailed dynamics information, the set-up has to be optimized for evacuating cold/hot air out of the magnet not to risk the damage to the magnet. Currently, commercial options for satisfactory static probes for protein 2H NMR measurements are relatively limited, with the best performance provided by Phoenix NMR and Doty Scientific in regard to the parameters discussed above. Very interesting options were created with low E capabilities (Gorkov and coworkers),(27) and cryogenic capabilities to perform experiments down to liquid He temperatures (Lipton and coworkers ).(28)
Figure 1.
Dependence of QE line shapes on the interpulse delay τ. The spectra were normalized per the number of scans acquired. Data collected on the F19-ring-d5 side chains of hydrated amyloid fibrils (3-fold symmetric polymorph) consisting of the Aβ protein in the 3-fold symmetric polymorph. The Aβ protein in the 3-fold symmetric polymorph, at 17.6 T and 25°C.
5. Experimental determination of line shapes
The QE pulse sequence is the most common way to obtain the line shapes: [90°x-τ -90°y-τ]. Several phase cycling schemes have been suggested.(22, 29, 30). The 90° pulse has to be of sufficient power to cover the full spectral band and is usually used at around 2.0–2.5 μs. Composite pulses and other techniques are sometimes used to overcome this power limitation.(31, 32) The second τ delay is usually set up for time smaller than necessary for the echo to get refocused, so that one can easily locate the maximum of the FID and left shift the spectrum to its exact position. The minimum delay time possible is given by the acoustical ring-down, and in the best performing probes can be as small as 15–20 μs. Long echo times significantly diminish overall intensity due to transverse relaxation (see the example in Figure 1).
Further, due to the possibility of anisotropy in transverse relaxation, the resulting line shapes can have a different form as a function of τ. The line shapes are most sensitive to motions when the time scale is of the order of the quadrupolar coupling constant. Examples of the effects of motions on line shapes are shown in the simulated spectra in Figure 2. As will be elaborated in the Modeling section, to obtain detailed dynamics information, one has to select the most likely motional model and then parametrize it. The line shape experiment can provide insights into the dependence of the dynamics on the presence of the solvent, and examples are shown in Fig. 3
Figure 2.
Line shape simulations, performed using EXPRESS software.(33) A–C methyl groups. A) Pake pattern narrowed by the three-site jump motions with the effective quadrupolar constant of Cq = 53.3 kHz. No methyl axis motions. B) Methyl axis motion along a restricted arc corresponding to the diffusion of the methyl axis occurring in the fast limit with respect to Cq. The arc length is 60°. C) Methyl axis undergoes rotameric motions, simulated by four magnetically distinct conformers with the weight of the major conformer twice that of each of the minor conformers; the jump rate is 2.5×105 s−1. D–F Ortho- and meta-deuterons of phenylalanine rings. D) Static Pake pattern with Cq = 180 kHz and an asymmetry parameter of 0.05. E) π-flip motion in the intermediate regime with a flip rate of 2.5×106 s−1. F) Fast π-flips with a flip rate of 1×108 s−1. Adapted from (17), license number 4226710808630
Figure 3.
Examples of the QE line shape spectra corresponding to selected side-chain sites in fibrils comprised of the Aβ protein in dry and hydrated (200% by weight) states in the 3-fold symmetric polymorph.(34, 35) Labeling pattern: F19-ring-d5. M35-methyl-d3. QE delay was 31 μs. Collected at 17.6 T and 37°C.
6. QCPMG-static analog of magic-angle spinning
The inherent low sensitivity of the technique calls for methods of signal enhancements. One of the most powerful approaches is the multi-echo acquisition scheme (Figure 4), also referred to as Quadrupolar Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill(QCPMG), which consists of several loops of QE cycles [τ3-90°-τ4]. It breaks the powder pattern into a series of spikelets and serves as a static analog of the MAS enhancement. An important distinction is that while MAS acts on the spatial part of the Hamiltonian, QCPMG affects the spin part. The distance between the spikelets in the QCPMG-detected spectrum is inversely related to the interpulse delay τ3 in the QE sequence.
Figure 4.
Timing scheme for the static QCPMG experiment for deuterium nuclei. Part A corresponds to a quadrupolar echo experiment with τ2 adjusted such that the acquisition starts at an echo maximum. Part B is the repeating unit with the π/2 refocusing pulses bracketed by delays τ3, τ4 followed by an acquisition period τa. Part C is an additional acquisition period ensuring the full decay of the FID. The phases ϕ1–ϕ3 are cycled to select the coherence transfer pathway p = 0 → ±1 → ∓1 etc. Reprinted with permission from (36). Copyright (1997) American Chemical Society.
The scheme is only applicable if a) the equipment can handle the required duty cycle with multiple 1 kW pulses; b) transverse relaxation is slow compared with the length of the power train; and c) heating the sample can be minimized with a relatively small number of echo trains. For hydrated protein powders, 10–15 echo pulses are empirically found to be a reasonable compromise between the desirable signal enhancement and other undesirable effects. Examples of the FID and spectra collected on the amyloid-β (Aβ) fibril samples with the use of the QCPMG scheme are shown in Figs. 5 and 6, respectively.
Figure 5.
An example of the free induction decay resulting from the QCPMG detection scheme. Collected on M35 side chains (methyl-d3) of hydrated fibrils consisting of the Aβ1-40 protein.(37) 15 echos were collected and 3072 scans. Breakthrough pulses were removed in the processing. Collected at 17.6 T and 37°C. The FID demonstrates a typical loss of signal in a hydrated protein powder sample.
Figure 6.
Examples of QCPMG spectra corresponding to selected side-chain sites in the fibrils comprised of the Aβ protein.(34, 37) Labeling patterns: F19-ring-d5 and M35-methyl-d3. Interpulse delay in the QCPMG cycle was 52 μs and the number of QCPMG cycles was 15. Collected at 17.6 T.
7. Experimental determination of the relaxation rates: Zeeman and Quadrupolar order
7.1 Zeeman order, T1Z
Inversion or saturation recovery can be coupled to either the QE or multiple echo acquisition schemes. Relaxation anisotropy is known to provide important constraints for the determination of the motional mechanisms.(2) An example is shown in Figure 7A below for the side-chain of L69 in villin headpiece subdomain protein.(38) First, the existence of observable anisotropy supports the model of 3-site jumps about the methyl spinning axis, as opposed to rotation diffusion, in agreement with earlier works.(4) However, the magnitude of the anisotropy is smaller than that predicted for 3-site jumps alone (shown by dotted line). This reduction reflects the presence of a slower additional motional mode for the methyl axis, in particular restricted rotational diffusion and rotameric jumps that will be discussed in detail in the modeling section.
Figure 7.
A) T1Z relaxation anisotropy profiles at 10°C and 17.6 T for L69-d3 side-chain in villin headpiece subdomain. Experimental data (circles) are compared to the simulated profile according to the single 3-site jumps mode (dotted line), and a multimode model involving 3-site jumps, restricted diffusion of methyl axes, and rotameric jumps (solid line). B) T1Z relaxation anisotropy profile for HMB at 25 °C and 17.6 T,(39) measured by QE detection scheme (black line), QCPMG detection scheme with inter-pulse delay τ of 302 μs (blue circles) and 102 μs (red squares).
Unlike MAS analog, QCPMG does not refocus relaxation anisotropy,(39) which can thus be studied under static conditions. An example is shown for hexa-methyl-benzene(HMB): relaxation anisotropy profiles are compared between the QE and QCPMG detection schemes with two different values of the inter-pulse delay τ of the echo train (Fig. 4).(39) The general qualitative pattern of anisotropy is similar in all three schemes, however, QCPMG detection does not lead to a simple averaging of T1 relaxation times in the nearest frequency regions. Rather, a more complex pattern is observed that is likely affected by the differential amount of transverse relaxation in the QCPMQ detection as compared to QE detection. Additionally, there is an effect of the feed-through signal, which is particularly strong for more rigid compounds such as HMB.(39)
In the example below, the T1Z measurements coupled to QCPMG detection (Figs. 6 and 8) enabled the characterization of the dynamics of a phenylalanine side chain buried in the core of amyloid-β fibrils across a wide temperature range.(34) From the change in the slope, it is evident that more than one motional mechanism is present.
Figure 8.
Examples of the T1Z time measurements shown for the F19 hydrophobic core side chain in the amyloid fibrils consisting of the Aβ protein in the 3-fold symmetric polymorph; the data correspond to the 60 kHz spikelets of the QCPMG spectra. A) Values of and β obtained from the fits of magnetization decay curves to the stretched exponential function of Eq. (6). Compared are the hydrated (red) and dry (black) states of the fibrils. Arrows demonstrate the temperature of the dynamical transition temperature and solid lines are the fits to the model elaborated in.(34) B) Saturation recovery magnetization build-up curve at 220 K for the hydrated state demonstrating the quality of the fit to the single exponent (dashed line) and the stretched exponential function (solid line). Data collected at 17.6 T.
Overall, heterogeneity of the conformational ensemble was observed from the magnetization decay curves (Fig. 8) fitted to the stretched exponential function of Eq. (6).
7.2 Quadrupolar order T1Q
Due to their dependence on different spectral density terms, T1Q measurements can be more sensitive to somewhat different transition frequencies, as can be seen from Eq. (5). Thus, in combination with the T1z measurement, they permit very precise model refinement. T1Q measurements tend to be more demanding experiments than T1Z due to intensity losses in the excitation period. One of the common pulse sequences for the measurement of the quadrupolar order is the broad-band Jeener-Broekaert variant: [90°x─ 2τe─67.5°─y─ 2τe─45°y─τ─45°y─acq].(40, 41) To avoid substantial signal losses, the excitation delay τe often needs to be limited to 5 μs in hydrated protein systems. The acquisition scheme can be either the QE or, if signal enhancement is desired, QCPMG.(39) T1Q analysis permitted for detection of the differences in the dynamics of various polymorphs of the amyloid-β fibrils (Fig. 9).(37)
Figure 9.
Plots of and T1Q vs. 1000/T at a 17.6 T magnetic field strength for the M35 site in the amyloid fibrils comprised of the amyloid-β (1-40) protein in the 2-fold and 3-fold symmetric polymorphs. The measurements employed the QCPMG signal-enhancement scheme. B) Structural representation of the 2-fold and 3-fold symmetric polymorphs of the amyloid-β fibrils, view down the fibril axis.(42, 43) The M35 side chain pointing into the water-accessible cavity is shown in red. Reprinted with permission from (37), Copyright (2016) Elsevier, License 4226720132799.
8. Motional modeling based on experimental data
In this section, we provide specific examples on how to model several modes on the basis of 2H static line shape and relaxation data. One of the most powerful tools for such data analysis is the EXPRESS program developed by Vold and co-workers.(33) Its predecessor MXET1 can also be found in the literature.(18) EXPRESS permits us to model a variety of NMR measurements including the QE, QCPMG, and MAS detection schemes as well as Zeeman and Quadrupolar order relaxation. Importantly, one can model motions comprising multiple motional modes which is especially relevant to complex protein systems.
8.1 Line shapes: Modeling rotameric jumps in methyl groups
Besides specifying the obvious parameters such as those involved in the experimental QE set-up, one has to input the values of Cq, value of tensor asymmetry, number of conformers, geometry of conformers, populations of conformers, and number of molecular orientations in the lab frame for the simulations of the powder state (tiles). It is almost always assumed that the principal axis system of the quadrupolar tensor for each deuteron is aligned along the position of the C─D bond.
When certain motions occur in the fast regime with respect to Cq (i.e., their rate is much faster than the value of Cq), the resulting spectrum is essentially a static one with the parameters of the averaged quadrupolar tensor. In general, this leads to a reduced effective Cq value, resulting in spectral compression, but can also lead either to a reduced or to an increased asymmetry parameter (an effect known as motional asymmetry). For example, when methyl rotations or three-site exchange between deuterons in the CD3 group are in the fast limit, their only effect on Cq is to reduce it by a factor of three, assuming the tetrahedral geometry of methyl carbon.(2) Typical values of non-averaged Cq are between 160 and 180 kHz.(1, 2, 20, 44) Deviations from the ideal tetrahedral geometry were observed in some cases.(45)
The typical number of powder pattern tiles for the QE line shape experiment is between 500 and 5,000 and as always is governed by the compromise between spectral quality and simulation time.
8.1.1 Valine side chain
Rotametic jumps in this case occur around the χ1 angle with three rotamers (Figs. 10 and 11), usually assumed to correspond to g+, g−, and t orientations. To set up these simulations in EXPRESS, one has to specify the Euler angles ΩPC representing this geometry: {(0, 109.5°, 0°), (0, 109.5°, 120°), and (0, 109.5°, 240°)}. Further, one has to specify the relative population of the rotamers. For example, if there is one major and two minor conformers with equal populations, we would specify x:1:1.
Figure 10.
Dihedral angles involved in the rotameric interconversion of valine, leucine, and methionine side chains. Common commercially available labeling patterns of methyl groups are shown in red. Taken from (17), license number 4226710808630.
Figure 11.
Schematic representation of rotamers in leucine and valine side chains. In leucine, rotameric jumps corresponding to hops between four non-equivalent positions of the leucine side chain out of the nine possible configurations. In valine, the interconversions are among the g+, g−, and t conformers.
8.1.2 Leucine side chain
In leucine side chains with the methyl-d3 labeling pattern, the situation is more complicated due to possible rotameric interconversions between both χ2 and χ1 angles, in principle resulting in nine possible conformers.(46) Out of these, only four are magnetically inequivalent (Fig. 11).(13, 47) Thus, it is possible to approximate all rotamers with effective jumps of the methyl axis using only four directions, pointing toward the corners of the tetrahedron. In this situation, the Euler angles for the motions of Cγ–Cδ axis become: {(0, 109.5°, 0°), (0, 109.5°, 120°), (0, 109.5°, 240°), and (0, 0°, 0°)}. A two-conformer model has also been employed for modeling leucine rotameric jumps.(13, 48)
8.1.3 Methionine side chain
Methionine is expected to have the need for the most sophisticated models due to the length of its side chain with three torsional angles (Fig. 10). In this case, it is often necessary to make an approximation rather than model complete rotameric behavior. For example, rotameric jumps of M35 side chains in the Aβ1-40 fibrils (corresponding to the spectra depicted in Fig. 3 were modeled with four conformers in which the S-Cε axis points toward the corners of the tetrahedron, analogous to the case of leucine above.(35)
8.2 Line shapes: Modeling ring flips in an aromatic side chain
We will consider an example of phenylalanine, for which the rings flips correspond to rotations around the χ2 angle and do not involve the ζ (para) deuteron.(34, 49) Thus, only the Dδ and Dε deuterons participate in the jumps. The Dζ deuteron can be excluded from the simulation when its contribution is filtered by recycle delay, which is too short for these rigid nuclei. Under the assumption of the ideal ring geometry, the contributions from the Dδ and Dε deuterons are identical.
Several sets of tensor parameters have been reported for crystalline phenylalanine amino acid. For example, Gall et al.(7) and Kinsey et al.(50) reported a Cq of 180 kHz and η = 0.05 based on line shape data at 100 K and 298 K, respectively. Alternatively, Hiyama et al.(3) reported = 171 Cq kHz and η < 0.02 in conjunction with deviations from the ideal ring geometry based on the spectral data in the range of 293–421 K, and a Cq of 180 kHz and η = 0 based on 80–100 K QCPMG-detected spectra in the villin headpiece subdomain protein(49). In several cases, slight deviations from the ideal ring geometry were observed,(3, 34, 49)which may render slight differences between the Dδ and Dε deuterons.
The following examples demonstrate the values of the Euler angles ΩPC for the Dδ deuteron, in which θ is the angle between the C-Dδ bond and phenyl axis and η = 0 : {(0, θ, 0°), (0, θ, 180°)}
8.3 Line shapes: Modeling fluctuations inside rotameric wells
Diffusive small-angle fluctuations within potential wells can be approximated by jump processes.(2, 19, 51, 52) The example below demonstrates the simulations of restricted asymmetric motions inside rotameric wells for the side chain of leucine. The Cγ–Cδ axis moves on the arc of a cone with an apex angle of 141° as defined by the tetrahedral geometry (Fig. 12).
Figure 12.

Restricted diffusion on an arc for the methyl axes of the leucine side chain, approximated by small nearest neighbor jumps of the Cγ–Cδ axis.
We assume that the Cγ–Cδ axis has a preferred direction in the crystal-fixed frame corresponding to φ = 0, where φ is the azimuthal angle in a spherical coordinate system associated with the Cγ atom and the Cβ–Cγ bond lies on the polar axis. The arc itself is represented by several sites with values of φ incremented in Δφ = 5° steps. For example, a 30° arc is given by seven sites with φ = −15° to φ = 15°. The effective diffusion coefficient D is given by D =Δφ2 k, where is the jump rate between two neighboring sites in the arc frame. Only nearest-neighbor jumps are allowed. A similar approach was used by Meints et al.(51) to describe local motions in solid deoxyribonucleic acids. The Euler angles for this mode can be written as {(0, 109.5°, φi)}.
These asymmetric motions such as motions along the arc lead to the effective asymmetry of the tensor.(38) When the motions inside the rotameric well occur in the fast motional regime with respect to Cq, one does not need to do the full simulation but can rather specify the value of the effective asymmetry parameter. Such an approach was employed for the M35 side chain in amyloid fibrils.(35) The motions inside the rotameric wells are not constrained to methyl-bearing side chains, but can also be evident in aromatic side chains.(49)
8.4 Line shapes: Simultaneous multiple modes
Line shapes often cannot be described with only one motional modes. Two examples are shown below, the first one combining rotameric jumps and fluctuations inside rotameric wells for a leucine side chain, and the second one combining pi-flips and small-angle fluctuations of phenyl axis for a phenylalanine side chain.
To model both the rotameric mode and the fluctuations along the restricted arc for the Cγ–Cδ axis of leucine, a two-frame nested model has to be set-up in EXPRESS.(38) The first frame corresponds to the arc motion and its Euler angle represents the rotations from the PAS system to the orientation associated with the single rotamer; the second rotameric frame transforms from the first frame to the crystal-fixed frame. For an arc length of 35°, the set of Euler angles become arc motion frame {(0, 109.5°, φi)}f with the polar angle φi taking values between −17.5° and 17.5° in steps of 5°; and rotameric frame {(0, 0, 0), (180°, 109.5°, 120°), (300°, 109.5°, 240°), and (300°, 109.5°, 0)}.
The choice of angles for the rotameric frame was made such that the orientations of the Cγ–Cδ axis corresponding to the center of the arc still point to the four corners of the tetrahedron. When the π-flips and small-angle fluctuations around the χ2 angle are considered, it is neither necessary nor convenient to set up simulations as two frames. Rather, it is easier to set up a single frame where the Euler angles correspond to all the values of the angles included in the model.(49) At the same time, this set-up requires the careful selection of the jump rates between different sites, realized through the “custom” jump rate matrix in EXPRESS.
In the example below, a so-called strong collision limit is shown for the small-angle fluctuations, such that they correspond to jumps between four sites, schematically represented in Fig. 13. The large-angle flips occur between sites 1–3 and 1–4 with an equal probability; this also holds for the 2–3 and 2–4 pairs. The small-angle jumps with the amplitude α occur between sites 1–2 and 3–4. The change in the χ2 angle for transitions 1–3 and 2–4 is exactly 180° due to the symmetry of the ring. The corresponding Euler angles for the four sites are {(0, θ, 0°), (0, θ, α), and (0, θ, 180°+ α)}.
Figure 13.
A) The phenylalanine side chain with the deuteron-labeling pattern marked in orange. B) Motional model for the fluctuations around the χ2 dihedral angle. The diagram displays sites’ connectivities according to the four-site strong collision model, illustrated for one of the Cδ–D bonds. The large-angle flips occur between sites 1–3 and 1–4 with an equal probability; this also holds for the 2–3 and 2–4 pairs. The small-angle jumps with the amplitude α occur between sites 1–2 and 3–4. Adapted with permission from (49). Copyright (2015) American Chemical Society
The rate constants of the transitions between the four positions are specified in the transition rate matrix:
| (7) |
where ksmall is the small-angle jump rate and kl arg e / 2 is the rate for large-angle jumps. For example, if small-angle jumps have the amplitude of 5°, then kl arg e / 2 corresponds to the rate of jumps from 0° to either 175° or 180°. The diagonal elements are chosen to satisfy the transition rate matrix conditions.
In additional to explicit motional modeling, several phenomenological approaches can be found in the literature for the interpretation of the line shape data. They range from the determination of the effective order parameter from the narrowing of the tensor compared with the rigid case under the assumption of axially symmetric motions,(15, 44) to the sophisticated slowly relaxing local structure approach.(53, 54)
8.5 Relaxation: Example of methyl jumps
Relaxation modeling will be first demonstrated for the case of a methyl-bearing side chain with the tree-site methyl jumps representing the dominant relaxation. EXPRESS has built-in blocks for the T1Z and T1Q relaxation experiments with either the QE or the QCPMG detection schemes. Assuming the tetrahedral methyl geometry, the Euler angles for the individual C-Dδ bonds are {(0, 109.5°, 0°), (0, 109.5°, 120°), and (0, 109.5°, 240°)}.
8.6 Relaxation: Creation of libraries and global fits at all temperatures
For cases in which one needs to model the distribution of rates due to the presence of non-exponential relaxation in the experimental data, EXPRESS can be used to create libraries of relaxation times corresponding to different rate constant values. Importantly, the intensities of the NMR signal can vary dependent on the rate and such libraries contain this information. When averaging is done assuming a certain functional form of the distribution, the intensities obtained for the individual values of the rate constants act as additional weighing factors.
Relaxation rates at different temperatures do not usually constitute unrelated parameters that can be fitted individually. They depend on the underlying mechanism. Typically, motionally activated Arrhenius-type behavior is chosen for the temperature dependence of the rate constants with the distribution arising from the distribution of activation energies. In this situation, the best course of action is to perform a global fit of the model to the data collected at all temperatures.(52, 55) For example, when the experimental behavior is fitted to the stretched exponential function of Eq. (6), one obtains the values of and β at all temperatures. Within the chosen motional model, one can calculate the predicted values of and β using the library of relaxation rates and intensities described above. Then, the predicted values of and β compared with the experimental values and best fit parameters are obtained through χ2 minimization.
8.7 Relaxation: Multimodal systems
When more than one relaxation mechanism is present, modeling is performed similar to what has been described for the simulation of the line shapes. An interesting situation can occur when the dominant motional mechanism that causes relaxation is different at different temperature intervals. For example, in the model of the π-flips and small-angle fluctuations described above (Fig. 13), the π-flips are likely to dominate relaxation at high temperatures, while at low temperature their effectiveness is greatly reduced and small-angle fluctuations dominate relaxation. Such a situation has been found for the hydrophobic core F19 in the Aβ fibrils (Fig. 8).(34) In terms of the modeling procedure, one now has to take into account motional processes.
Because relaxation in this model depends on two jump rates, both of which can change in the intervals spanning many orders of magnitude, it becomes impractical to construct libraries of relaxation rates and intensities covering all possible combinations of such rates. An approach more tailored to the specifics of the experimental results provides a better way. In particular, if two dominant relaxation regimes are well established at the ends of the experimental temperature range, the parameters governing the two relaxation mechanisms can be approximately determined in the relevant limits assuming Arrhenius behavior. They are then fine-tuned by a χ2 minimization procedure, each step of which requires the simulation of the full-model relaxation process.
9. Concluding remarks
2H solid-state static NMR techniques have great potential to complement and expand the information obtained by modern powerful MAS-based approaches for the elucidation of protein dynamics (9, 56–58), especially for amorphous systems. The rapid development of solid-state probes technology coupled with increasing field strength will open up new avenues for investigations of low-sensitivity biological systems such as the site-specific labeled disordered proteins imbedded in membranes and protein-nucleic acid complexes. Motional parameters obtained by computational modeling or phenomenological approaches can be used as constraints in molecular dynamics simulations for the elucidation of the thermodynamic and kinetic picture governing dynamics in the solid state.
Highlights.
We discuss experimental static deuteron NMR techniques and computational approaches
Application are chosen from studies of amyloid fibrils
The focus is placed on basic methodology such as line shape and relaxation data
We discuss computational modeling approaches for data interpretation
Acknowledgments
Support for this work was received from the National Institutes of Health Grant 1R15 GM111681.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Vold RR. Deuterium NMR studies of dynamics in solids and liquid crystals. In: Tycko R, editor. Nuclear magnetic resonance probes of molecular dynamics. Kluwer academic Publishers; Dordrecht: 1994. pp. 27–112. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vold RL, Vold RR. Deuterium relaxation in molecular solids. In: Warren W, editor. Advances in magnetic and optical resonance. Acadenic Press; San Diego: 1991. pp. 85–171. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hiyama Y, Silverton JV, Torchia DA, Gerig JT, Hammond SJ. Molecular-structure and dynamics of crystalline para-fluoro-d,l-phenylalanine - a combined X-ray NMR investigation. J Am Chem Soc. 1986;108:2715–2723. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Batchelder LS, Niu CH, Torchia DA. Methyl reorientation in polycrystalline amino-acids and peptides - a H-2 NMR spin-lattice relaxation study. J Am Chem Soc. 1983;105:2228–2231. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wittebort RJ, Olejniczak ET, Griffin RG. Analysis of deuterium nuclear-magnetic-resonance line-shapes in anisotropic media. J Chem Phys. 1987;86:5411–5420. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rice DM, Wittebort RJ, Griffin RG, Meirovitch E, Stimson ER, Meinwald YC, Freed JH, Scheraga HA. Rotational jumps of the tyrosine side-chain in crystalline enkephalin - H-2 NMR line-shapes for aromatic ring motion in solids. J Am Chem Soc. 1981;103:7707–7710. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gall CM, Diverdi JA, Opella SJ. Phenylalanine ring dynamics by solid-state H-2 NMR. J Am Chem Soc. 1981;103:5039–5043. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mack JW, Usha MG, Long J, Griffin RG, Wittebort RJ. Backbone motions in a crystalline protein from field-dependent H-2-NMR relaxation and line-shape analysis. Biopolymers. 2000;53:9–18. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(200001)53:1<9::AID-BIP2>3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Krushelnitsky A, Reichert D. Solid-state NMR and protein dynamics. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2005;47:1–25. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang AC, Kennedy MA, Reid BR, Drobny GP. A solid-state H-2-NMR investigation of purine motion in a 12-base-pair rna duplex. J Magn Reson Ser B. 1994;105:1–10. doi: 10.1006/jmrb.1994.1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Olsen GL, Echodu DC, Shajani Z, Bardaro MF, Varani G, Drobny GP. Solid-state deuterium NMR studies reveal μs-ns motions in the HIV-1 transactivation response rna recognition site. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:2896–2897. doi: 10.1021/ja0778803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Olsen GL, Bardaro MF, Echodu DC, Drobny GP, Varani G. Hydration dependent dynamics in RNA. J Biomol NMR. 2009;45:133–142. doi: 10.1007/s10858-009-9355-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Batchelder LS, Sullivan CE, Jelinski LW, Torchia DA. Characterization of leucine side-chain reorientation in collagen fibrils by solid-state H-2 NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982;79:386–389. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.2.386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ying WW, Irvine SE, Beekman RA, Siminovitch DJ, Smith SO. Deuterium NMR reveals helix packing interactions in Phospholamban. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:11125–11128. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Struts AV, BMF . Advances in biological solid-state NMR. The Royal Society of Chemistry; 2014. Structural dynamics of retinal in rhodopsin activation viewed by solid-state 2H NMR spectroscopy; pp. 320–352. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sun C, Mitchell O, Huang JX, Boutis GS. NMR studies of localized water and protein backbone dynamics in mechanically strained elastin. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115:13935–13942. doi: 10.1021/jp207607r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vugmeyster L, Ostrovsky D. Static solid-state 2H NMR methods in studies of protein side-chain dynamics. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spec. 2017;101:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2017.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Greenfield MS, Ronemus AD, Vold RL, Vold RR, Ellis PD, Raidy TE. Deuterium quadrupole-echo NMR spectroscopy. III. Practical aspects of lineshape calculations for multiaxis rotational processes. J Magn Reson. 1987;72:89–107. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Torchia DA, Szabo A. Spin-lattice relaxation in solids. J Magn Reson. 1982;49:107–121. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Brown MF. Theory of spin-lattice relaxation in lipid bilayers and biological membranes 2H and 14n quadrupolar relaxation. J Chem Phys. 1982;77:1576–1599. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Abragam A. Principles of nuclear magnetism. Clarendon Press; Oxford: 1961. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Duer MJ. Solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; Oxford: 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sillescu H. Heterogeneity at the glass transition: A review. J NonCryst Sol. 1999;243:81–108. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Beckmann PA, Schneider E. Methyl group rotation, H-1 spin-lattice relaxation in an organic solid, and the analysis of nonexponential relaxation. J Chem Phys. 2012;136:054508. doi: 10.1063/1.3677183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Albericio F. Solid-phase synthesis: A practical guide. CRC Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Atreya HS, editor. Isotope labeling in biomolecular NMR. 2012. Isotope labeling in biomolecular NMR; pp. 1–219. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gor'kov PL, Chekmenev EY, Li C, Cotten M, Buffy JJ, Traaseth NJ, Veglia G, Brey WW. Using low-e resonators to reduce rf heating in biological samples for static solid-state NMR up to 900 MHz. J Magn Reson. 2007;185:77–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lipton AS, Heck RW, Sears JA, Ellis PD. Low temperature solid-state NMR experiments of half-integer quadrupolar nuclides: Caveats and data analysis. J Magn Reson. 2004;168:66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2004.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mananga ES, Roopchand R, Rumala YS, Boutis GS. On the application of magic echo cycles for quadrupolar echo spectroscopy of spin-1 nuclei. J Magn Reson. 2007;185:28–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Antonijevic S, Wimperis S. Refocussing of chemical and paramagnetic shift anisotropies in h-2 NMR using the quadrupolar-echo experiment. J Magn Reson. 2003;164:343–350. doi: 10.1016/s1090-7807(03)00272-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mananga ES, Rumala YS, Boutis GS. Finite pulse width artifact suppression in spin-1 quadrupolar echo spectra by phase cycling. J Magn Reson. 2006;181:296–303. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Brown MF, Heyn MP, Job C, Kim S, Moltke S, Nakanishi K, Nevzorov AA, Struts AV, Salgado GFJ, Wallat I. Solid-state H-2 NMR spectroscopy of retinal proteins in aligned membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta, Biomembr. 2007;1768:2979–3000. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vold RL, Hoatson GL. Effects of jump dynamics on solid state nuclear magnetic resonance line shapes and spin relaxation times. J Magn Reson. 2009;198:57–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vugmeyster L, Ostrovsky D, Hoatson GL, Qiang W, Falconer BI. Phenylalanine side-chain in the hydrophobic core of amyloid fibrils reveals a solvent-driven dynamical transition. J Phys Chem B. 2017;121:7267–7275. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b04726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vugmeyster L, Clark MA, Falconer BI, Ostrovsky D, Gantz D, Qiang W, Hoatson GL. Flexibility and solvation of amyloid -beta hydrophobic core. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:18484–18495. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.740530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Larsen FH, Jakobsen HJ, Ellis PD, Nielsen NC. Sensitivity-enhanced quadrupolar-echo NMR of half-integer quadrupolar nuclei. Magnitudes and relative orientation of chemical shielding and quadrupolar coupling tensors. J Phys Chem A. 1997;101:8597–8606. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vugmeyster L, Ostrovsky D, Clark MA, Falconer BI, Hoatson GL, Qiang W. Fast motions of key methyl groups in amyloid-beta fibrils. Biophys J. 2016;111:2135–2148. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Vugmeyster L, Ostrovsky D, Ford JJ, BSD, Lipton AS, Hoatson GL, Vold RL. Probing the dynamics of a protein hydrophobic core by deuteron solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:13651–13658. doi: 10.1021/ja902977u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Vold RL, Hoatson GL, Vugmeyster L, Ostrovsky D, De Castro PJ. Solid state deuteron relaxation time anisotropy measured with multiple echo acquisition. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009;11:7008–7012. doi: 10.1039/b907343d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hoatson GL. Broad-band composite excitation sequences for creating quadrupolar order in H-2 NMR. J Magn Reson. 1991;94:152–159. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wimperis S. Broad-band and narrow-band composite excitation sequences. J Magn Reson. 1990;86:46–59. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Petkova AT, Yau WM, Tycko R. Experimental constraints on quaternary structure in alzheimer's beta-amyloid fibrils. Biochemistry. 2006;45:498–512. doi: 10.1021/bi051952q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Paravastu AK, Leapman RD, Yau WM, Tycko R. Molecular structural basis for polymorphism in Alzheimer's beta-amyloid fibrils. Proc Natl Aca Sci USA. 2008;105:18349–18354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806270105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Keniry MA, Kintanar A, Smith RL, Gutowsky HS, Oldfield E. Nuclear magnetic-resonance studies of amino-acids and proteins - deuterium nuclear magnetic-resonance relaxation of deuteriomethyl-labeled amino-acids in crystals and in halobacterium-halobium and escherichia-coli cell-membranes. Biochemistry. 1984;23:288–298. doi: 10.1021/bi00297a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vugmeyster L, Ostrovsky D, Lipton AS. Origin of abrupt rise in deuteron NMR longitudinal relaxation times of protein methyl groups below 90 K. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117:6129–6137. doi: 10.1021/jp4021596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Janin J, Wodak S, Levitt M, Maigret B. Conformation of amino-acid side-chains in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1978;125:357–386. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90408-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Huang TH, Skarjune RP, Wittebort RJ, Griffin RG, Oldfield E. Restricted rotational isomerization in polymethylene chains. J Am Chem Soc. 1980;102:7377–7379. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Weidner T, Breen NF, Li K, Drobny G, Castner DG. Sum frequency generation and solid-state NMR study of the structure, orientation, and dynamics of polystyrene-adsorbed peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:13288–13293. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003832107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Vugmeyster L, Osrovsky D, Villafranca TR, Sharp J, Xu W, Lipton AS, Hoatson GL, Vold RL. Dynamics of hydrophobic core phenylalanine residues probed by solid-state deuteron NMR. J Phys Chem B. 2015;119:14892–14904. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b09299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kinsey RA, Kintanar A, Oldfield E. Dynamics of amino-acid side-chains in membrane-proteins by high-field solid-state deuterium nuclear magnetic-resonance spectroscopy - phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan. J Biol Chem. 1981;256:9028–9036. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Meints GA, Miller PA, Pederson K, Shajani Z, Drobny G. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies of furanose ring dynamics in the DNA hhal binding site. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:7305–7314. doi: 10.1021/ja075775n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Struts AV, Salgado GFJ, Martnez-Mayorga K, Brown MF. Retinal dynamics underlie its switch from inverse agonist to agonist during rhodopsin activation. Natur Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18:392–394. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Meirovitch E, Nayeem A, Freed JH. Analysis of protein lipid interactions based on model simulations of electron-spin resonance-spectra. J Phys Chem. 1984;88:3454–3465. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Meirovitch E, Liang ZC, Freed JH. Protein dynamics in the solid state from H-2 NMR line shape analysis: A consistent perspective. J Phys Chem B. 2015;119:2857–2868. doi: 10.1021/jp511386b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Vugmeyster L, Ostrovsky D, Penland K, Hoatson GL, Vold RL. Glassy dynamics of protein methyl groups revealed by deuteron NMR. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117:1051–1061. doi: 10.1021/jp311112j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Schanda P, Ernst M. Studying dynamics by magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy: Principles and applications to biomolecules. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2016;96:1–46. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2016.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Linser R, Sarkar R, Krushelnitzky A, Mainz A, Reif B. Dynamics in the solid-state: Perspectives for the investigation of amyloid aggregates, membrane proteins and soluble protein complexes. J Biomol NMR. 2014;59:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10858-014-9822-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hong M, Zhang Y, Hu FH. Membrane protein structure and dynamics from NMR spectroscopy. In: Johnson MA, Martinez TJ, editors. Annual review of physical chemistry. Vol. 63. 2012. pp. 1–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]












