Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Sep 11;8:13646. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32006-z

Bacillus velezensis A2 fermentation exerts a protective effect on renal injury induced by Zearalenone in mice

Nan Wang 1,#, Peng Li 1,#, Jiawen Pan 1, Mingyang Wang 1, Miao Long 1,✉, Jian Zang 2,✉, Shuhua Yang 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6133983  PMID: 30206282

Abstract

Zearalenone (ZEN) is an estrogen-like mycotoxin occurring in food and feeds, and it can cause oxidative damage and apoptosis in the testis, liver, and kidney. A current concern for researchers is how to reduce the harm it causes to humans and animals. In this study, our aim was to isolate and identify a novel and efficient ZEN-detoxifying strain of bacteria, and we aimed to assess the protective effect of the isolated strain on kidney damage caused by ZEN in mice. Our results indicated that a strain of Bacillus velezensis (B. velezensis), named A2, could completely degrade ZEN (7.45 μg/mL) after three days of incubation at 37 °C in the Luria-Bertani (LB) medium. This fermentation broth of the B. velezensis A2 strain was given to mice. The histopathological analysis indicated that the fermentation broth from the B. velezensis A2 strain reduced the degree of renal injury that is induced by ZEN. Furthermore, it greatly reduced the increase in serum levels of creatinine (CRE), uric acid (UA), and urea nitrogen (BUN) caused by ZEN. In addition, B. velezensis A2 strain also significantly inhibited the increase of malonaldehyde (MDA) content, and reversed the decreases of total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activities caused by ZEN. Studies have shown that ZEN is involved in the regulation of mRNA and protein levels of genes involved in the ER stress-induced apoptotic pathway, such as heavy chain binding protein (BIP), C-/-EBP homologous protein (CHOP), cysteine Aspartate-specific protease-12 (Caspase-12), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and BCL2-related X protein (Bcl-2 and Bax). However, when mice were administered the fermentation broth of the B. velezensis A2 strain, it significantly reversed the expressions of these genes in their kidney tissue. In conclusion, our results indicate that the newly identified strain of B. velezensis A2, has a protective effect from renal injury induced by ZEN in mice. This strain has a potential application in the detoxification of ZEN in feed and protects animals from ZEN poisoning.

Introduction

Zearalenone is a well-known F2 toxin that is produced by Fusarium fungi, and it is commonly found in moldy grain1–3. Contamination of ZEN in cereals is an ongoing global concern4–6. ZEN has harmed animals through food enrichment with cereals, and then it affects human health through the food chain7–9. ZEN is known to induce cytotoxicity and oxidative damage, and its toxicity primarily manifests in the reproductive system10–12, the liver13,14, and the kidneys15,16. ZEN binds to the estrogen receptor in the cytoplasm; this causes lipid peroxidation and a series of cytotoxic effects that alter serum enzymology and ROS levels17,18. Many studies have shown that ZEN is highly toxic to the blood, kidneys, and liver of mice. Additionally, ZEN could alter the enzymatic and hematological parameters of mice, and it could induce higher levels of oxidative stress19–21. Meanwhile, ZEN-induced apoptosis is characterized by ROS production and increased lipid peroxidation22,23. A previous study demonstrated that ZEN induced apoptosis in RAW 264.7 macrophages through endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER stress)24.

Biological detoxification is an optimal method for ZEN detoxification because it has the advantages of high specificity, high efficiency, and non-toxic metabolites. ZEN can be degraded by several strains. Previous studies have shown that bio-detoxification agents can transform ZEN into less toxic or non-toxic metabolites. These bio-detoxification agents include B. subtilis25,26, B. amyloliquefaciens27, B. licheniformis28,29, Rhodococcus K40830, L. rhamnosus31, L. plantarum32, L. reuteri33, and S. cerevisiae34,35. These strains provide a mycotoxin detoxification strategy for cell wall adsorption and activate enzyme degradation pathways. However, these strains cannot completely eliminate ZEN during short-term fermentation. Our study found that the A2 strain completely removed ZEN (7.45 μg/mL) after three days of fermentation, which was not reported for the other strains. Our research supports a viable detoxification program for the control of mycotoxins in the future.

Reports have shown that B. licheniformis CK1 degrades ZEN in feed and alleviates the toxicity of ZEN in piglets29. Previous research has shown that β-glucan in the cell wall of yeast has the ability to adsorb ZEN. This may be why feeding the yeast products had the ability to inhibit the effects of ZEN on the growth and health of pigs35–37. It has also been reported that ZEN-contaminated Luria-Bertani (LB) broth does not exhibit the endocrine disrupting effects induced by ZEN in rats treated with R. pyridinivorans K40830. In ZEN detoxification studies, the impact of probiotic strains has also been reported on distal organs in animals. For example, treatment with L. paracasei BEJ01 reduceds the immunotoxic effects that were induced by ZEN38. L. rhamnosus GG prevented or treated the damaging effects of ZEN in mice by regulating the secretion of mucus by goblet cells and improving plasma D-lactate, serum IL-8, and immunoglobulin (Ig) levels31.

In the present study, we aimed to identify a new ZEN-degrading strain and to determine its detoxification effects in vitro. Then, we aimed to evaluate the protective effects of the isolated strain on kidney damage caused by ZEN in mice. This study could possibly lay a foundation for the detoxification of ZEN and the efficient biotransformation of ZEN degradation with probiotics. The A2 strain was isolated from soil, and it demonstrated a high capacity to degrade ZEN. To better assess the ability of the A2 strain to degrade ZEN, we conducted in vitro and in vivo tests that identify strains and determine detoxification effects. The safety of the strains was verified in the animal experiments, and this could lay a foundation for future production practice.

Results

Strain screening

After separation and enrichment, the bacterial strains isolated from soil were examined for their ZEN-degrading capabilities (Fig. 1). In gifu anaerobic medium (GAM), the strains A1, A2, A3, B2, C3, and E1 demonstrated the highest degrading capability. Their detoxifying rates were 74.07%, 94.68%, 100.00%, 56.60%, 100.00%, and 52.08% of total zearalenone after 72 h, respectively. In Luria-Bertani (LB) medium, the strains A1, A2, A3, B1, B2, C2, C3, D3, and E1 demonstrated the highest degrading capability. Their detoxifying rates were 80.74%, 100.00%, 66.67%, 67.90%, 76.89%, 71.60%, 65.43%, 58.02%, and 72.84% of total zearalenone after 72 h, respectively. The same strain demonstrated different rates of degradation in different media. This could be due to differences in the degradation rate of ZEN under the conditions of different nutrient components, such as the carbon source and nitrogen source in the different media. The optimal degradation rate was observed in the A2 strain. The A2 strain exhibited a strong degradation capacity of ZEN. The ZEN-detoxifying rates for the A2 strain were 94.68% and 100.00% in GAM and LB medium, respectively. Therefore, we used the A2 strain as a ZEN antidote for subsequent experiments.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Isolation of ZEN degrading strains. A total of 9 strains were incubated with ZEN in GAM medium (A) or LB medium (B) for 72 h. Their detoxifying rates are shown as a percentage. The white column indicates A2 incubated in LB medium, and the gray column indicates A2 incubated in GAM medium.

Identification of the A2 strain

The A2 strain grew normally and in accordance with the close-packed rule for culture streaking. The colonies of this strain were white, skin-like pellicles that were slimy with a ridged surface when grown in LB (Fig. 2A). It was a Gram-positive bacillus strain, and a large number of spores were produced when cultured at 37 °C for 36 h in LB medium (Fig. 2B). After constructing the phylogenic tree, the Gram-positive A2 strain was located on the B. velezensis branch (Fig. 3A). Additionally, the A2 strain shared 99.5% similarity with B. velezensis Y2 (Fig. 3B). Thus, we concluded that the A2 strain is a member of the B. velezensis species.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Colony morphology and spore staining morphology of the A2 strain grown on an LB culture plate. (A) The A2 strain was inoculated on an LB agar plate and cultured at 37 °C for 24 h. (B) The A2 strain was inoculated into LB medium at 37 °C, and it was shaken at 150 rpm for 36 h to prepare spores. Spores were stained green with 5% malachite green. The A2 strains were stained red with 5% Safranin O, which are in the form of short rods.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Homology anlysis based on partial 16 S rDNA sequences of the A2 strain and the related microorganisms. (A) The phylogenetic tree was made by MEGA7. The trees were constructed by the maximum likelihood method. The GenBank accession numbers are listed in the front of the bacteria strain name. The A2 strain (GenBank: MG727659.1) is located on the Bacillus velezensis branch. (B) Homology analysis was performed by ClustalW. The 16 S rDNA sequence of the A2 strain (1452 bp) is 99.5% identical to Bacillus velezensis Y2 (GenBank: KY887762.1). The number in parentheses is the GenBank accession number of the sequence.

Zearalenone degradation

Based on the HPLC peak of the control group, in the ZEN group, HPLC revealed a material peak around 8 minutes in the ZEN group (Fig. 4A,B). However, in the A2 group and the A2 + ZEN group, this peak was not observed (Fig. 4C,D). These results indicate that the A2 strain was fermented in LB medium for 72 h, and it completely eliminated the ZEN toxin (7.45 μg/mL).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The A2 strain was incubated with ZEN (7.45 μg/mL) in LB medium for 72 h, and the residual amount of ZEN was determined by HPLC. (A) Uncontaminated LB medium (control group). (B) LB medium containing ZEN (7.45 μg/mL) (ZEN group). (C) LB medium containing only the A2 strain (A2 group). (D) ZEN-containing LB medium after A2 strain treatment (A2 + ZEN group).

Histopathological changes in the kidney

In vivo results show that ZEN caused lobulation and atrophy of the glomerulus in murine kidneys (Fig. 5B). Furthermore, the kidney sections from the A2 and the A2 + ZEN groups revealed minor pathomorphological changes (Fig. 5C,D). These results indicate that co-administration of the A2 fermentation broth exerted a protective effect from ZEN-induced kidney injury.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Detection of pathological changes in renal tissue by tissue section HE staining. Images were taken at a magnification of X10 and X40. (A) Control group, (B) ZEN group, (C) A2 group, and (D) A2 + ZEN group. The arrows “ → ” indicate a pathological injury in the kidney, such as glomerulus lobulation and glomerulus atrophy.

Organ coefficient and blood biochemistry

Our results show that the kidney indexes in the ZEN group were significantly decreased (P < 0.05). However, the kidney indexes were improved in the A2 + ZEN group compared to the ZEN group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6). Serum activities of BUN, UA, and CRE function as biochemical markers that indicate renal damage. As shown in Fig. 7, there was a marked increase in serum BUN, UA, and CRE in the ZEN group (p < 0.05). When compared to the control group, there were no significant differences found in the A2 group and the A2 + ZEN group. Meanwhile, serum BUN, UA, and CRE were significantly reduced in the A2 + ZEN group, when compared to the ZEN group (P < 0.01). These results indicate that mice administered the A2 fermentation broth exerted a protective effect from ZEN-induced kidney injury.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Observed changes in the ratio of kidney weight to body weight in mice. “*” Indicates significant differences compared to the control group (P < 0.05). “#” Iindicates significant differences compared to the ZEN group (P < 0.05).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Serum enzymatic changes in each group of mice as determined by a serum test kit. “*” Indicates significant differences (P < 0.05) compared to the control group, and “**” indicates highly significant differences (P < 0.01) compared to the control group. “#” Indicates significant differences (P < 0.05) compared to the ZEN group, and “##” indicates highly significant differences (P < 0.01) compared to the ZEN group.

Antioxidant changes in the kidney

The level of MDA in the kidney is used as an index to indicate lipid peroxidation caused by kidney damage. The levels of GSH-PX and T-SOD in the kidney are used as indexes to indicate antioxidants that reduce renal oxidative damage. As shown in Fig. 8, the levels of GSH-PX and T-SOD in the ZEN group were decreased (P < 0.05), and the MDA levels were significantly increased (P < 0.01) compared to the control group. However, oral administration of the B. velezensis A2 fermentation broth significantly inhibited the increase in MDA content caused by ZEN, and it reversed the decreases in T-SOD and GSH-Px activities caused by ZEN. These results indicate that co-administration of the A2 fermentation broth exerted a protective effect from ZEN-induced kidney injury.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Oxidation and antioxidation parameters of renal tissues of mice in each group were detected by an oxidation kit. “*” Indicates significant differences (P < 0.05) compared to the control group, and “**” indicates highly significant differences (P < 0.01) compared to the control group. “#” Indicates significant differences (P < 0.05) compared to the ZEN group, and “##” indicates highly significant differences (P < 0.01) compared to the ZEN group.

Gene and protein expression associated with the ER stress

The results of quantitative RT-PCR and Western blot analysis indicated that the A2 fermentation broth affects transcription factors that are associated with the ER stress signaling pathway (Figs 9, 10) (Supplementary Figure S1). When compared to the control group, there was a marked increase in the expression levels of BIP, JNK, Caspase-12, Bax, and CHOP in the ZEN group (P < 0.05). On the contrary, oral administration of the A2 fermentation broth greatly reduced the expression levels of BIP, JNK, Caspase-12, Bax, and CHOP (P < 0.05). Furthermore, Bcl-2 synthesis was down-regulated in the ZEN group (P < 0.01), and the co-administration of the A2 fermentation broth significantly reversed the decreased expression (P < 0.01). Overexpression of JNK and CHOP protein may induce protein phosphorylation and, ultimately, lead to cell apoptosis. As shown in Fig. 10, P-JNK and DDIT3 protein expression was detected in the ZEN group by Western blot analysis. The ratio of Bcl-2 and Bax has been proposed as a key factor in the regulation of apoptosis. As shown in Fig. 11, a low ratio of Bcl-2/Bax was observed in the ZEN group, and a low ratio of Bcl-2/Bax indicates increased apoptosis. However, there were no significant changes in the Bcl-2/Bax ratio between the A2 and A2 + ZEN groups. These results indicate that the A2 fermentation broth plays a regulatory role in ZEN-induced ER stress and apoptosis in murine kidneys.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Effects of B. velezensis A2 fermentation broth on the expression levels of genes involved in the endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling pathway that was induced by ZEN in kidneys of mice. “*” Indicates significant differences (P < 0.05) compared to the control group, and “**” indicates highly significant differences (P < 0.01) compared to the control group. “#” Indicates significant differences (P < 0.05) compared to the ZEN group, and “##” indicates highly significant differences (P < 0.01) compared to the ZEN group.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Effects of B. velezensis A2 fermentation broth on the expression levels of proteins involved in the endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling pathway that was induced by ZEN in the kidneys of mice. “*” Indicates significant differences (P < 0.05) compared to the control group, and “**” indicates highly significant differences (P < 0.01) compared to the control group. “#” Indicates significant differences (P < 0.05) compared to the ZEN group, and “##” indicates highly significant differences (P < 0.01) compared to the ZEN group.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Open in a new tab

The ratio of Bcl-2 and Bax was used to indicate the apoptosis coefficient. (K) Control group, (ZEN) ZEN group, (A2) A2 group, and (A2 + ZEN) A2 + ZEN group.

Discussion

In this study, we isolated and identified a B. velezensis strain, named A2, which demonstrated a high capacity to degrade ZEN. This strain has been deposited in the China Center for Type Culture Collection with the deposit number M2018352.

According to a previous study, following treatment of ZEN (5 μg/mL) and the Rhodococcus K408 strain for 5 days, HPLC analyses revealed a ZEN-degradation efficiency of 87.21%30. The isolated B. subtilis degraded more than 95% of the ZEN (1 mg/kg) when it was incubated in liquid medium for 24 h26. In addition, the study also demonstrated that ZEN was adsorbed by yeast37. However, this type of a degradation effect may not be enough to completely decontamination of ZEN. In this present study, a different ZEN-degradation efficiency was determined for the A2 strain of B. velezensis. When incubated in LB medium for 72 h, a 7.45 μg/mL dose of ZEN could be thoroughly degraded.

Previous research has shown that the B. velezensis strain can be used as a biocontrol agent for various plant diseases caused by phytopathogenic fungi, and it can effectively inhibit the growth of Fusarium by producing a variety of antimicrobial peptides40–42. However, a study on the application of B. velezensis as a method of mycotoxin detoxification has not been reported yet. In the current study, homologous sequence alignment showed a high level of homology between the B. velezensis A2 strain and B. amyloliquefaciens. In addition, B. velezensis is a biocontrol agent that exhibits broad spectrum antimicrobial activity against various foodborne pathogens, and there are no gene families that correlate with human pathogenicity detected in the B. velezensis genome43,44. Therefore, we presume that the B. velezensis strain, A2, has potential as a feed supplement to detoxify ZEN.

In the current study, the doses of ZEN were selected based on a toxicity test in mice in a previous study (40 mg/kg-8% of LD50)13. The A2 strain was cultured in LB for 24 h because that is the optimal logarithmic growth phase for bacterial activity. Our results indicate that oral administration of a dose of 0.2 mL of A2 fermentation broth (containing the A2 strain and its secretions) exerted protective effects on ZEN-induced kidney damage in mice.

The serum activities of BUN, UA, and CRE function as biochemical markers for kidney damage. The activities of MDA, T-SOD, and GSH-PX can serve as biochemical markers for oxidative damage. Previous studies have shown that and the presence of ZEN in a diet can cause a change in the content and enzyme activity of these biochemical markers20,21,45. In our study, we found that ZEN induced oxidative damage in kidneys, which is in accordance with previous reports19. Additionally, co-administration of A2 fermentation significantly changed the serum enzyme and tissue enzymology induced by ZEN in mice. These results indicate that the A2 fermentation broth can prevent ZEN-induced kidney injury in mice.

Previous studies have shown that the ER stress pathway has been reported to participate in oxidative damage and apoptosis induced by ZEN22–24,46. To provide further evidence that the A2 fermentation broth exerts a protective effect from ZEN-induced kidney injury, we explored whether the A2 fermentation broth could decrease both ER stress and apoptosis induced by ZEN.

It has previously been reported that ER stress compromises the protein folding properties of the endoplasmic reticulum, which give rise to accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER lumen. This causes the regulatory factor Bip (GRP78) to dissociate from PERK, ATF-6, and IRE1, which regulate downstream transcriptional factors that trigger apoptosis23,24,47–49. Apoptosis proceeds primarily through ER stress-induced activation of the transcription factors CHOP, Bax, JNK, and Caspase-1250–52. In the present study, our data demonstrated similar results. Multiple reports have shown that treatment with ZEN also induces ER stress in multiple cell systems22–24,53. This suggests that ER stress is a key mediator of damaging mechanisms induced by ZEN. The transcription factor CHOP is a key factor in ER stress-induced apoptosis, and it is up-regulated by the three branches of the unfolded protein response: PERK, ATF-6, IRE149,51,54. CHOP down-regulates the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 and up-regulates the pro-apoptotic protein Bax, which is necessary for Bax-mediated apoptosis24,55. Concurrently, we found that the same regulatory mechanisms are utilized in ZEN-induced apoptosis by regulating the Bcl-2 family proteins, which can up-regulate Bax and down-regulate Bcl-2 expression56,57. Meanwhile, ER stress activates IRE1, and IRE1 causes a cascade of phosphorylation incidents that ultimately activates JNK58. These data indicate that apoptosis induced by ZEN in the kidneys of mice is associated with the ER stress pathway.

These results confirm that ZEN-induced oxidative damage and apoptosis are associated with ER stress59,60. Thus, we examined whether the B. velezensis A2 strain could cope with ZEN-induced ER stress and apoptosis. Previous studies in RAW 264.7 macrophages have shown that 4-phenylbutyrate significantly decreases the ZEN-induced up-regulation of GRP78 and CHOP24. We found that oral administration of the A2 fermentation broth demonstrated the same regulatory mechanism. Our data also suggests that the A2 fermentation broth greatly inhibited ER stress and apoptosis induced by ZEN, as indicated by the reduction in ZEN-induced up-regulation of GRP78, CHOP, JNK, Caspase-12, and Bax in the kidneys of mice. We speculate that the detoxification mechanism of the A2 strain is similar to that of a previously reported biological antidote27,29–31, It may be due to the complete degradation of ZEN by the fermentation broth of the A2 strain in mice. Furthermore, the B. velezensis A2 strain did not cause kidney pathology. Its degradation product is non-toxic, and it does not cause damage to the body. This suggests that the A2 strain, like other ZEN detoxifying strains25,27–30, has potential as a probiotic for the practical production practices of ZEN detoxification.

In summary, we have shown that ZEN-induced kidney tissue damage was associated with ER stress induced by ZEN in cells22. We also demonstrate that co-treatment with fermentation broth from the B. velezensis A2 strain protects kidney cells from ZEN poisoning by inhibiting ROS generation and ER stress, suggesting that B. velezensis A2 fermentation broth treatment might be advantageous in preventing the toxicity of ZEN.

Conclusion

This study is the first to report that treatment with B. velezensis A2 can effectively relieve the ZEN-induced oxidative damage and apoptosis in murine kidney. This study lays a foundation for the practical application of fermentation broth from the A2 strain in the future.

Materials and Methods

Soil, chemicals, and media

Microorganisms capable of degrading ZEN were isolated from soil samples that were collected from a farm at Shenyang in Liaoning, China, which had frequent Fusarium head blight epidemics. The standard chemicals for ZEN were purchased from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA). The microbial culture was screened using minimal medium (MM) supplemented with ZEN as a carbon source 27. Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates were used to isolate single colonies. LB and GAM (Hopebio, Qingdao, China) broth were used to culture the bacteria.

The MM stock solution (1/2 liter: 2.5 g NH4Cl, 1.25 g NaCl, 7.5 g KH2PO4, and 21.25 g Na2HPO4.2H2O) was adjusted to pH 7.0 using 4 M NaOH. The solution was autoclaved at 121 °C for 20 minutes, and after cooling, it was stored at room temperature.

The LB stock solution (1/2 liter: 5 g NaCl, 2.5 g yeast extract, and 5 g tryptone) was adjusted to pH 7.0 using 4 M NaOH. It was autoclaved at 121 °C for 20 minutes. After cooling, the flask is swirled to ensure mixing. For production of a solid medium, 15 g/L of agar powder was added.

Isolation of bacterial strains able to degrade ZEN

Soil samples (2.5 g) were blended in normal saline (25 mL), and after the soil settled, 300 μL of the resulting supernatants were incubated in 30 mL of MM supplemented with ZEN (2.79 μg/mL). The cultures were incubated at 37 °C for 3 days with shaking at 150 rpm. Then, 30 mL of LB broth containing 2.79 μg/mL of ZEN was inoculated with 1% (v/v) of each culture, and this was followed by 3 days of incubation under the same conditions. This procedure was repeated 5 times. Then, each culture was centrifuged at 17,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected and mixed with equal volumes of chromatographic pure methanol. For both treatment groups, all solutions prepared for HPLC were filtered through a 0.22 μm-pore size filter (Millipore) before use. The dominant bacteria were streaked on LB agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. Single colonies were inoculated into 5 mL LB medium (ZEN 7.45 μg/mL) and incubated at 37 °C (150 rpm) for 3 days. The ZEN concentrations in the samples were analyzed by HPLC. The same treatment was done for those cultured in the GAM medium. Strains with ZEN-degrading activity were stored in 25% glycerol at −80 °C until use.

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

Analysis of ZEN toxin content of the samples by HPLC, as previously described28,39. The supernatant from the 0.5 mL centrifuged sample was tested, and it was added to an equal volume of chromatographic grade methanol. After 20 minutes, the reaction was complete, and it was then filtered with a 0.22 μm organic filter. Then, 20 μL was injected into the HPLC system to analyze the content of ZEN. The control group underwent the same treatment. The specific conditions of HPLC detection were as follows: Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm); Sample size: 20 μL; Mobile phase: methanol/water (80/20); Flow rate: 1.0 mL/min; Fluorescence detector and excitation wavelength: 274 nm. The percentage of ZEN removal was calculated using the following formula: 1- (peak area of ZEN in the supernatant /peak area of ZEN in the positive control) × 100%.

Phenotypic characterization of the optimal bacteria

The A2 strain was subjected to Gram staining, morphological analysis, and 16 S rDNA sequence analysis. Genomic DNA of the A2 strain was isolated using the Ezup Column Bacteria Genomic DNA Purification Kit (B518255, Sangon, China). The standard 16 S rRNA gene primers (27 f: 5′- AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG -3′ and 1492r: 5′- CGGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT -3′) for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used to amplify the gene sequence of the A2 strain. The PCR cycles were as follows: 5 min of hot-start at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C (30 s), 65 °C (30 s), and 72 °C (45 s), and the final 72 °C degrees to extend for 10 min). The resultant PCR product was then sequenced by Sangon (Shanghai, China). Sequences similar to the A2 gene were identified using BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). All similar sequences were retrieved from NCBI, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed by DNAStar.

Animals

Female Kunming mice (25 ± 2 g and 4 weeks-old) were purchased from Changchun biotechnology of China. The mice were maintained under SPF conditions with restricted-access with a humidity of 45–55%, they were maintained in 12 h light/dark cycles at a temperature of 23 ± 2 °C. Before the experiment began, the mice were given an acclimatization period of 1 week. These experiments were performed in accordance with the European Communities Council Directive of 24 November 1986 (86/609/EEC) and the principles of SPF laboratory animal care. Furthermore, the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.

Experimental design and treatment

A stock solution of ZEN at 48 mg/mL was prepared in pure alcohol and stored at −20 °C. The working solution was prepared by diluting the stock solution into LB media and the A2 strains LB-fermentation broth.

The A2 strains were streaked on LB agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Single colonies were inoculated into 5 mL aliquots of LB medium and incubated at 37 °C (150 rpm) for 24 h. Then, 30 mL LB media was inoculated with 300 μL of a 24 h bacterial culture of the A2 strains and incubated at 37 °C (150 rpm) for 24 h.

The mice were divided into four groups of 10 mice per group: K group, ZEN group, A2 group, and A2 + ZEN group. Animals in each of the different treatment groups were treated daily by oral gavage (without anesthesia) for 28 days. The mice in the control group were orally administrated 0.2 mL of LB media every day. The mice in the ZEN group were orally administrated 0.2 mL of LB media containing a 40 mg/kg dose of ZEN every day. The concentration of ZEN was selected based on preliminary experiments by Long Miao et al.13. The mice in the A2 group were orally administrated 0.2 mL of the A2 LB-fermentation solution. The mice in the A2 + ZEN group were orally administrated 0.2 mL of the A2 LB-fermentation solution containing a 40 mg/kg dose of ZEN.

Twenty-four hours after administration of the final treatment, mice were sacrificed under anesthesia. Blood samples were collected, and serum was isolated. Kidney tissues were collected in cryogenic vials and stored at −80 °C until further use.

Kidney organ indexes and Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) staining

Twenty-four hours after the last treatment administration, the body weights of all mice were measured. Then, the mice were sacrificed, and the kidneys were excised from each mouse. Organ coefficients were calculated as the organ wet weight percentage of the total body weight. Pathological changes in kidneys tissues from 3 randomly selected mice from each group were examined using HE staining (Servicebio, Wuhan China).

Biochemical assays

Blood samples were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min. The serum was collected and used to determine the following biochemical parameters blood urea nitrogen (BUN), uric acid (UA), and creatinine (CRE). A suspension of kidney tissue was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was collected, and the activities of T-SOD, GSH-PX, and MDA were assayed. Each measurement was determined following the manufacturer’s instructions for the commercial kits obtained from the Institute of Biological Engineering of Nanjing Jiancheng, China.

Gene expression

Total RNA was extracted from the kidney using the RNAiso Plus reagent (9108, Applied TaKaRa, Da Lian, China). Measurement of the purity and concentration of total RNA was done using a micro-volume spectrometer (uLITE, Biochrom Ltd, England) at an absorbance ratio of 260/280 nm. Values in the range of 1.8–2.0 indicate a pure RNA samples. Then, the extracted total RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using a TaKaRa PrimeScript TM RT reagent kit (RR047A, Applied TaKaRa, DaLian, China).

An ABI 7500 real-time PCR system and the SYBR® Premix Ex TaqTM II kit (RR820A, Applied TaKaRa, DaLian, China) were used to conduct real-time PCR. For quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), the total volume of the PCR reaction mixture was 20 µL, and it consisted of 2 μL of cDNA product, 0.8 μL of reverse primers, 0.8 μL of forward primers, 10 μL of Taq MasterMix solution, 6 μL of RNase-free water, and 0.4 μL of Rox. The conditions of PCR were as follows: an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 34 s, 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min, and 95 °C for 15 s. Each sample was measured in triplicate. The relative changes in mRNA were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. The primers, shown in Table 1, were designed and synthesized by Sangon (Shanghai, China).

Table 1.

Primers for RT-PCR analysis.

Gene Accession No. Primer Sequences (5′ - 3′) Product Size/bp
β-actin BC_138614.1 Forward: CTGTCCCTGTATGCCTCTG
Reverse: TTGATGTCACGCACGATT		 221 bp
GRP78 NM_001163434.1 Forward: CGCTGGGCATCATTGAAGTAA
Reverse: GAGGTGGGCAAACCAAGACAT		 145 bp
JNK NM_001310452.1 Forward: TCCTCCAAATCCATTACCTCC
Reverse: CTCCAGCACCCATACATCAAC		 149 bp
Caspase-12 NM_009808.4 Forward: CTCAATAGTGGGCATCTGGGT
Reverse: GAAGGTAGGCAAGACTGGTTC		 151 bp
Bcl-2 NM_009741.5 Forward: CTCAGGCTGGAAGGAGAAGAT
Reverse: AAGCTGTCACAGAGGGGCTAC		 156 bp
Bax NM_007527.3 Forward: GCAAAGTAGAAGAGGGCAACC
Reverse: ACTGGACAGCAATATGGAGCT		 156 bp
CHOP NM_001290183.1 Forward: TTCTCCTTCATGCGTTGCTTC
Reverse: AAAACCTTCACTACTCTTGACCCTG		 218 bp
Open in a new tab

Western blot analysis

The total protein form kidney tissue was obtained using the ProteinExt® Mammalian Total Protein Extraction Kit (DE101, TransGen Biotech. Beijing, China).The Easy II Protein Quantitative Kit was used to determine the protein concentrations (DQ111, TransGen Biotech. Beijing, China). The renal proteins were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to PVDF membranes (Solarbio, Beijing, China). The membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following antibodies: β-Actin (13E5, CST, USA), GRP78 (C50B12, CST, USA), JNK (CST, USA), P-JNK (81E11, CST, USA), Caspase-12 (CST, USA), Bcl-2 (D17C4, CST, USA), Bax (D3R2M, CST, USA), CHOP (D46F1, CST, USA), and anti-DDIT3 (phosphor S30, abcam, England). Then, the membranes were washed with TBST and incubated with a secondary antibody blocking solution for 2 h at room temperature. Proteins were detected on a DNR Bio Imaging system by using the NcmECL Ultra method according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Ncmbio, Suzhou, China). The Gel Quant system was used to quantify the expression of target proteins.

Statistical analysis

Each experiment was performed with three technical replicates. The SPSS 19.0 software was used to carry out all statistical tests, and the results are presented as mean ± standard error (X ± SE). One-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the mean differences among groups. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Figure S1 (858.5KB, doc)

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants No. 31772809; grants No. 31872538; grants No. 31640084, grants No. 31302152; No. 31201961) and the Key Research and Development Program of Shenyang (No.17-165-3-00).

Author Contributions

Miao Long designed the research. Nan Wang, Peng Li, Jian Zang, and Jiawen Pan conducted the research, Nan Wang, Shuhua Yang, and Mingyang Wang analyzed the data, Nan Wang wrote the manuscript, Nan Wang had the primary responsibility for the final content of the manuscript. Miao Long supervised all of the authors and read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Nan Wang and Peng Li contributed equally.

Contributor Information

Miao Long, Email: longmiao@syau.edu.cn.

Jian Zang, Email: 13898827221@163.com.

Shuhua Yang, Email: yangshuhua0001@syau.edu.cn.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-32006-z.

References

  • 1.Franz Berthiller F, et al. Masked mycotoxins: a review. Molecular nutrition & food research. 2013;57:165–186. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201100764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Czembor E, Stepien L, Waskiewicz A. Effect of Environmental Factors on Fusarium Species and Associated Mycotoxins in Maize Grain Grown in Poland. PloS one. 2015;10:e0133644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Haggblom P, Nordkvist E. Deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, and Fusarium graminearum contamination of cereal straw; field distribution; and sampling of big bales. Mycotoxin research. 2015;31:101–107. doi: 10.1007/s12550-015-0220-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pinotti L, Ottoboni M, Giromini C, Dell’Orto V, Cheli F. Mycotoxin Contamination in the EU Feed Supply Chain: A Focus on Cereal Byproducts. Toxins. 2016;8:45. doi: 10.3390/toxins8020045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alshannaq, A. & Yu, J.-H. Occurrence, Toxicity, and Analysis of MajorMycotoxins in Food. International journal of environmental research and public health14, 10.3390/ijerph14060632 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 6.Eckard S, Wettstein FE, Forrer HR, Vogelgsang S. Incidence of Fusarium species and mycotoxins in silage maize. Toxins. 2011;3:949–967. doi: 10.3390/toxins3080949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zöllner P, et al. Concentration Levels of Zearalenone and Its Metabolites in Urine, Muscle Tissue, and Liver Samples of Pigs Fed with Mycotoxin-Contaminated Oats. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2002;50:2494–2501. doi: 10.1021/jf0113631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dänicke S, Swiech E, Buraczewska L, Ueberschär KH. Kinetics and metabolism of zearalenone in young female pigs. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition. 2005;89:268–276. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2005.00516.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Metzler M, Pfeiffer E, Hildebrand A. Zearalenone and its metabolites as endocrine disrupting chemicals. World Mycotoxin Journal. 2010;3:385–401. doi: 10.3920/WMJ2010.1244. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Minervin F, Dell’Aquila ME. Zearalenone and reproductive function in farm animals. International journal of molecular sciences. 2008;9:2570–2584. doi: 10.3390/ijms9122570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ioannis A. Tsakmakidis AGL, Tarek AA. Khalifa, Constanten M. Boscos, Aikaterini Saratsi and Costas Alexopoulos. Evaluation of zearalenone and alpha-zearalenol toxicity on boar sperm DNA integrity. Journal of applied toxicology: JAT. 2008;28:681–688. doi: 10.1002/jat.1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gray SL, Lackey BR, Boone WR. Effects of Panax ginseng, zearalenol, and estradiol on sperm function. J Ginseng Res. 2016;40:251–259. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2015.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Miao Long S-HY, et al. The Protective Effect of Grape-Seed Proanthocyanidin Extract on Oxidative Damage Induced by Zearalenone in Kunming Mice Liver. International journal of molecular sciences. 2016;17:808. doi: 10.3390/ijms17060808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jian Ji PZ, et al. The Antagonistic Effect of Mycotoxins Deoxynivalenol and Zearalenone on Metabolic Profiling in Serum and Liver of Mice. Toxins. 2017;9:28. doi: 10.3390/toxins9010028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ji J, et al. Explaining combinatorial effects of mycotoxins Deoxynivalenol and Zearalenone in mice with urinary metabolomic profiling. Scientific reports. 2018;8:3762. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21555-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dong M, et al. The toxic effects and fate of intravenously administered zearalenone in goats. Toxicon: official journal of the International Society on Toxinology. 2010;55:523–530. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xunsi Qin MC, et al. Oxidative stress induced by zearalenone in porcine granulosa cells and its rescue by curcumin in vitro. PloS one. 2015;10:e0127551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Salem IB, et al. SIRT1 protects cardiac cells against apoptosis induced by zearalenone or its metabolites α- and β-zearalenol through an autophagy-dependent pathway. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 2017;314:82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2016.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Miao Long SY, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Li P, Guo Y. The Influence of Selenium Yeast on Hematological, Biochemical and Reproductive Hormone Level Changes in Kunming Mice Following Acute Exposure to Zearalenone. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2016;174:362–368. doi: 10.1007/s12011-016-0725-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Abbès S, et al. The protective effect of hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate against haematological, biochemical and pathological changes induced by Zearalenone in mice. Toxicon: official journal of the International Society on Toxinology. 2006;47:567–574. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hou YJ, et al. Mycotoxin-Containing Diet Causes Oxidative Stress in the Mouse. PloS one. 2013;8:e60374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Salem IB, et al. Crocin and Quercetin protect HCT116 and HEK293 cells from Zearalenone-induced apoptosis by reducing endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell stress & chaperones. 2015;20:927–938. doi: 10.1007/s12192-015-0613-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ben Salem I, et al. Crocin protects human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293) from alpha- and beta-Zearalenol-induced ER stress and apoptosis. Environmental science and pollution research international. 2016;23:15504–15514. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6741-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chen F, et al. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Cooperates in Zearalenone-Induced Cell Death of RAW 264.7 Macrophages. International journal of molecular sciences. 2015;16:19780–19795. doi: 10.3390/ijms160819780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tinyiro SE, Wokadala C, Xu D, Yao W. Adsorption and degradation of zearalenone by bacillus strains. Folia microbiologica. 2011;56:321–327. doi: 10.1007/s12223-011-0047-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cho KJ, et al. In vitro degradation of zearalenone by Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnology letters. 2010;32:1921–1924. doi: 10.1007/s10529-010-0373-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.An Lee K-CC. Je-Ruei Liu. Isolation and characterization of a Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain with zearalenone removal ability and its probiotic potential. PloS one. 2017;12:e0182220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hsu TC, Yi PJ, Lee TY, Liu JR. Probiotic characteristics and zearalenone-removal ability of a Bacillus licheniformis strain. PloS one. 2018;13:e0194866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fu, G. et al. Effect of Degradation of Zearalenone-Contaminated Feed by Bacillus licheniformis CK1 on Postweaning Female Piglets. Toxins8, 10.3390/toxins8100300 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Kriszt R, et al. A new zearalenone biodegradation strategy using non-pathogenic Rhodococcus pyridinivorans K408 strain. PloS one. 2012;7:e43608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wan MLY, Turner PC, Allen KJ, El-Nezami H. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG modulates intestinal mucosal barrier and inflammation in mice following combined dietary exposure to deoxynivalenol and zearalenone. Journal of Functional Foods. 2016;22:34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2016.01.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vega MF, et al. Zearalenone adsorption capacity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from pigs. Brazilian journal of microbiology: [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] 2017;48:715–723. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yang, W. C., Hsu, T. C., Cheng, K. C. & Liu, J. R. Expression of the Clonostachys rosea lactonohydrolase gene by Lactobacillus reuteri to increase its zearalenone-removing ability. Microb Cell Fact16, 10.1186/s12934-017-0687-8 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 34.Krifaton, C. et al. Application of a yeast estrogen reporter system for screening zearalenone degrading microbes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 429–435, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.063 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 35.Joannis-Cassan C, Tozlovanu M, Hadjeba-Medjdoub K, Ballet N, Pfohl-Leszkowicz A. Binding of zearalenone, aflatoxin B1, and ochratoxin A by yeast-based products: a method for quantification of adsorption performance. Journal of food protection. 2011;74:1175–1185. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Moslehi-Jenabian S, Lindegaard L, Jespersen L. Beneficial effects of probiotic and food borne yeasts on human health. Nutrients. 2010;2:449–473. doi: 10.3390/nu2040449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Alexandra C, Weaver M, Todd S, Kim SW. Protective Effect of Two Yeast Based Feed Additives on Pigs Chronically Exposed to Deoxynivalenol and Zearalenone. Open Access. 2016;6:3336–3353. doi: 10.3390/toxins6123336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Abbes S, Ben Salah-Abbes J, Sharafi H, Oueslati R, Noghabi KA. Lactobacillus paracasei BEJ01 prevents immunotoxic effects during chronic zearalenone exposure in Balb/c mice. Immunopharmacology and immunotoxicology. 2013;35:341–348. doi: 10.3109/08923973.2013.772194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.He, W. J. et al. An aldo-keto reductase is responsible for Fusarium toxindegrading activity in a soil Sphingomonas strain. Scientific reports7, 10.1038/s41598-017-08799-w (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 40.Juan Palazzini PR, et al. Sofía Chulze. Biocontrol of Fusarium graminearum sensu stricto, Reduction of Deoxynivalenol Accumulation and Phytohormone Induction by Two Selected Antagonists. Toxins. 2018;10:88. doi: 10.3390/toxins10020088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yu Cao, H. P., et al. Antagonism of Two Plant-Growth Promoting Bacillus velezensis Isolates Against Ralstonia solanacearum and Fusarium oxysporum. Scientific reports8, 10.1038/s41598-018-22782-z (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42.Lim SM, et al. Diffusible and Volatile Antifungal Compounds Produced by an Antagonistic Bacillus velezensis G341 against Various Phytopathogenic Fungi. Plant Pathol J. 2017;33:488–498. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.04.2017.0073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Catherine Nannan AG, Simon C, Jacques M. Complete Genome Sequence of Bacillus velezensis CN026 Exhibiting Antagonistic Activity against Gram-Negative Foodborne Pathogens. Genome Announc. 2018;6:e01543–01517. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01543-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee HJ, Chun B-H, Jeon HH, Kim YB, Lee SH. Complete Genome Sequence of Bacillus velezensis YJ11-1-4, a Strain with Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial Activity, Isolated from Traditional Korean Fermented Soybean Paste. Genome Announc. 2017;5:e01352–01317. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01352-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jiang SZ, et al. Effects of purified zearalenone on growth performance, organ size, serum metabolites, and oxidative stress in postweaning gilts. Journal of animal science. 2011;89:3008–3015. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zheng W, et al. Zearalenone altered the cytoskeletal structure via ER stress- autophagy- oxidative stress pathway in mouse TM4 Sertoli cells. Scientific reports. 2018;8:3320. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21567-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kim IS, Xu CW, Shiau W, Grant CW. D. Chemical biology investigation of cell death pathways activated by endoplasmic reticulum stress reveals cytoprotective modulators of ASK1. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2009;284:1593–1603. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807308200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pfaffenbach KT, Lee AS. The critical role of GRP78 in physiologic and pathologic stress. Current opinion in cell biology. 2011;23:150–156. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Barati MT, et al. Differential expression of endoplasmic reticulum stress-response proteins in different renal tubule subtypes of OVE26 diabetic mice. Cell stress & chaperones. 2016;21:155–166. doi: 10.1007/s12192-015-0648-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Liu MQ, Chen Z, Chen LX. Endoplasmic reticulum stress: a novel mechanism and therapeutic target for cardiovascular diseases. Acta pharmacologica Sinica. 2016;37:425–443. doi: 10.1038/aps.2015.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Nakka VP, Prakash-Babu P, Vemuganti R. Crosstalk Between Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress, Oxidative Stress, and Autophagy: Potential Therapeutic Targets for Acute CNS Injuries. Molecular neurobiology. 2016;53:532–544. doi: 10.1007/s12035-014-9029-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Liu, H. et al. The Natural Occurring Compounds Targeting Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med2016, 10.1155/2016/7831282 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 53.Yang D, et al. Apoptosis inducing factor gene depletion inhibits zearalenone-induced cell death in a goat Leydig cell line. Reproductive toxicology. 2017;67:129–139. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Guzel, E. et al. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Homeostasis in Reproductive Physiology and Pathology. International journal of molecular sciences18, 10.3390/ijms18040792 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 55.Zhou, M. et al. Effects of Zearalenone Exposure on the TGF-beta1/Smad3 Signaling Pathway and the Expression of Proliferation or Apoptosis Related Genes of Post-Weaning Gilts. Toxins10, 10.3390/toxins10020049 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 56.Banjerdpongchai R, et al. Mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum stress pathways cooperate in zearalenone-induced apoptosis of human leukemic cells. Journal of hematology & oncology. 2010;3:50. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-3-50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang Y, et al. Zearalenone induces apoptosis and cytoprotective autophagy in primary Leydig cells. Toxicology letters. 2014;226:182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Guo W, et al. The inhibitory effect of quercetin on asymmetric dimethylarginine-induced apoptosis is mediated by the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway in glomerular endothelial cells. International journal of molecular sciences. 2014;15:484–503. doi: 10.3390/ijms15010484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zheng, W. L. et al. ROS-Mediated Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis Induced by Zearalenone in Mouse Sertoli Cells via ER Stress and the ATP/AMPK Pathway. Toxins10, 10.3390/toxins10010024 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 60.Salem IB, et al. Christophe Lemaire Activation of ER stress and apoptosis by a- and b-zearalenol in HCT116 cells, protective role of Quercetin. NeuroToxicology. 2016;53:334–342. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2015.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure S1 (858.5KB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES