Skip to main content
Academic Pathology logoLink to Academic Pathology
. 2018 Sep 10;5:2374289518799253. doi: 10.1177/2374289518799253

Educational Case: Immune-Related Disorders of the Bowel

Celiac Disease

Shaomin Hu 1, Nicole C Panarelli 1,
PMCID: PMC6134487  PMID: 30214918

Abstract

The following fictional case is intended as a learning tool within the Pathology Competencies for Medical Education (PCME), a set of national standards for teaching pathology. These are divided into three basic competencies: Disease Mechanisms and Processes, Organ System Pathology, and Diagnostic Medicine and Therapeutic Pathology. For additional information, and a full list of learning objectives for all three competencies, see http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2374289517715040.

Keywords: pathology competencies, organ system pathology, gastrointestinal tract, immune-related disorders of the bowel, celiac disease, collagenous sprue, villous blunting, serologic studies

Primary Objective

Objective GT5.2: Celiac Disease. Explain the pathophysiology of gliadin hypersensitivity (celiac disease).

Competency 2: Organ System Pathology; Topic GT: Gastrointestinal Tract; Learning Goal 5: Immune-Related Disorders of the Bowel.

Patient Presentation

A 30-year-old otherwise healthy woman presents with malodorous diarrhea of 6 months’ duration. It is sometimes associated with abdominal cramps and bloating. It has been getting worse in the past month, and she also reports a 10-pound weight loss and chronic fatigue. She is a frequent traveler and experienced diarrhea during a trip to Canada last summer, which resolved within a few days. She denies nausea, vomiting, constipation, dark stool, or blood in stool. The patient is lactose intolerant, but denies consuming lactose containing dairy products in past 6 months. She has not changed her diet in any other way. She is not taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or any other over-the-counter medications. No one else in her family has similar symptoms. She has a cousin with Crohn disease. Physical examination reveals no fever. The abdomen is soft, nontender and nondistended, without masses or organomegaly. The bowel sounds are normal.

Diagnostic Findings, Part 1

The patient’s primary care physician ordered some screening tests. Complete blood count revealed hemoglobin 11.8 g/dL (reference range 14.0-17.4 g/dL) and mean corpuscular volume 76 fL (reference range 80.0-96.0 fL). Iron level was 30 µg/dL (reference range 65-175 µg/dL). The stool occult blood, culture, and ova and parasite tests were negative. Liver function tests and fecal calprotectin (a marker for intestinal inflammation and surrogate marker of inflammatory bowel disease) were within normal ranges. Serum immunoglobulin A (IgA), IgG, and IgM levels were within normal ranges.

Questions/Discussion Points, Part 1

What Diseases Would You Consider in Your Differential Diagnosis?

Since the patient is a frequent traveler, and she has a medical history of lactose intolerance and family history of Crohn disease, chronic parasitic infection, food sensitivities, and inflammatory bowel disease are important considerations. Other common differential diagnoses for chronic diarrhea include celiac disease, chronic viral or bacterial infections, irritable bowel syndrome, microscopic colitis, autoimmune enteropathy, and primary immunodeficiency. However, the foregoing initial screening results make infection, inflammatory bowel disease, and immunodeficiencies unlikely explanations for her symptoms.

Diagnostic Findings, Part 2

Further autoimmune workup revealed anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-TTG) IgA >128 U/mL (reference range <10 U/mL), anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (anti-DGP) IgA > 142 U/mL (reference range <10 U/mL), and anti-DGP IgG >302 U/mL (reference range <10 U/mL).

Questions/Discussion Points, Part 2

How do the Additional Laboratory Findings Help You Narrow the Differential Diagnosis?

The above serology results make celiac disease highly likely. Screening for IgA anti-TTG antibodies is the first-line test for celiac disease. This may be performed in conjunction with serum IgA levels since patients with selective IgA deficiency may have false negative TTG results. The presence of IgA-endomysial antibodies (EMA) supports the diagnosis in patients with equivocal TTG titers.1 Assays for IgG-TTG, IgG-DGP, and IgG-EMA are available for IgA deficient patients, a group at increased risk for development of celiac disease.

Serologic studies display suboptimal specificity for celiac disease. Elevated anti-TTG and anti-EMA alone are insufficient to diagnose this disorder, and biopsy confirmation is required.2 Furthermore, a small percentage of patients with negative serologies prove to have celiac disease.3 This may occur in patients with primary immunodeficiencies (eg, common variable immunodeficiency, selective IgA deficiency), those on therapeutic immunosuppression, or early in the disease course. Seronegativity was recently described in patients with severe, long-standing disease in whom anti-TTG antibodies were bound to the small intestinal mucosa and sequestered from circulation.4 At present, serology is considered a diagnostic modality, whereas endoscopic duodenal biopsy represents the gold standard.

What Is Recommended Next for Evaluation of This Patient?

The patient was referred to a gastroenterologist for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy evaluation. The gastric mucosa appeared normal endoscopically. The duodenal endoscopy and biopsy findings are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A, Endoscopic view of duodenal mucosa. B, Duodenal biopsy (hematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification: 20×).

Diagnostic Findings, Part 3

What Are the Abnormalities Present in Figure 1? What Are the Possible Explanations of the Histologic Findings in Figure 1B?

Figure 1A shows mildly scalloped mucosa in the second portion of the duodenum. This alteration is common in patients with celiac disease. Figure 1B shows a duodenal biopsy sample (hematoxylin and eosin stain) displaying partially effaced villous architecture, increased intraepithelial lymphocytes and hyperplastic crypts. While these histologic findings suggest celiac disease, by themselves they are insufficient to distinguish celiac disease from its mimics, as discussed subsequently. However, based on the positive serologic studies and characteristic histologic features, a diagnosis of celiac disease was rendered in the case at hand. The patient was put on gluten-free diet. After 8 weeks, the symptoms improved substantially.

Questions/Discussion Points, Part 3

What Is the Pathophysiology of Celiac Disease?

Celiac disease is an allergic response to dietary gluten in genetically susceptible individuals. Gluten is partially digested into a mix of complex proteins, including gliadins and glutenins, by intestinal enzymes. Gliadins cause increased intestinal permeability by binding to the CXCR3 chemokine receptor on enterocytes and causing release of zonulin, which transiently weakens intercellular junctions. Undigested peptides leak into the lamina propria where they are further broken down by tissue transglutaminase. Resultant deaminated gluten fragments may be recognized as pathogens, in some individuals, and presented to CD4+ T cells by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DQ2/8-bearing antigen presenting cells.5 This activates Th2 cells and leads to B cell proliferation and Th1-mediated cytokine release. Inflammation-mediated damage to the intestinal epithelium allows passage of more gluten fragments into the mucosa and incites a self-sustaining inflammatory response.6 Elimination of dietary gluten is the only effective treatment.

What Genetic Features Are Associated With Celiac Disease?

Patients with celiac disease often harbor HLA DQ2 and DQ8 alleles. In fact, HLA genotyping may be used as a screening test for children at risk for celiac disease.7 Absence of these alleles essentially excludes the diagnosis, particularly in asymptomatic patients. The risk of celiac disease is 1 in 10 for first-degree relatives of affected patients, a substantial increase over the 1% prevalence observed in the United States population.8,9

Which Other Disorders Are Associated With Celiac Disease?

Patients with Down syndrome, Turner syndrome, and those with other immune-mediated disorders, such as autoimmune thyroid disease and type 1 diabetes are at increased risk for celiac disease. Patients with celiac disease frequently have extraintestinal manifestations. Iron deficiency anemia results from inadequate iron absorption in the duodenum.10 Dermatitis herpetiformis is a blistering skin disease which is associated with celiac disease.11 Peripheral neuropathy and ataxia may result from impaired small intestinal uptake of vitamin B12 and folate. Osteoporosis and infertility are also associated with gluten sensitivity.1

What Would You Expect to See in Endoscopic Biopsy Samples From the Duodenum?

The normal duodenal mucosa displays circumferential folds called “plicae circularis” that are oriented perpendicular to the long axis of the small intestine; these facilitate absorption of ingested nutrients (Figure 2A). Histologically, the mucosa is organized into villous projections with a core of lamina propria lined by absorptive cells and goblet cells and downward extensions of epithelium between villi, called crypts (Figure 2B). The crypts are lined by similar epithelia, as well as Paneth and endocrine cells (Figure 2C). The normal villous to crypt ratio is approximately 3-4:1. Intraepithelial CD8+ T cells normally number approximately 20 per 100 enterocytes, or 1 T lymphocyte per 6 enterocytes.12 They display a “decrescendo pattern” of distribution, meaning that their density is lower at the villous tips compared to crypt bases (Figure 2D). The lamina propria also contains abundant plasma cells and lymphocytes and occasional neutrophils and eosinophils.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Normal duodenal mucosa. A, Endoscopic view of normal duodenum with smooth mucosa and circumferential intestinal folds (plicae circularis). B, Normal duodenal mucosa with slender villi and villus to crypt ratio of 3-4:1, and underlying submucosal Brunner’s glands (hematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification: 10×). C, High power view of duodenal crypts showing goblet cells and Paneth cells (hematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification: 40×). D, Normal duodenal villi with scattered intraepithelial lymphocytes more prominent in the base (hematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification: 20×).

Small intestinal samples from patients with celiac disease display varying degrees of intraepithelial lymphocytosis, villous shortening/blunting, increased lymphoplasmacytic lamina propria inflammation, and crypt hyperplasia. Early or milder cases of celiac disease may display normal villous architecture and only increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (Figure 3A and B). Better-developed cases show markedly shortened or completely effaced villi (Figure 3C), elongated and hyperplastic crypts (Figure 3D), and lamina propria expansion by chronic inflammation (Figure 3D). Although occasional intraepithelial neutrophils may be present, this is not a prominent feature of celiac disease.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Celiac disease. A and B, Celiac disease with mild villous blunting and increased intraepithelial lymphocytes particularly in the villous tips (hematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification: A, 20×; B, 40×). C and D, Celiac disease with almost completely blunted villi, marked intraepithelial lymphocytosis, hyperplastic crypts, and expanded lamina propria by chronic inflammation (hematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification: C, 20×; D, 40×).

What Disorders Are in the Histologic Differential Diagnosis of Celiac Disease?

Other disorders such as peptic duodenitis, tropical sprue, common variable immunodeficiency, autoimmune enteropathy, and small intestinal Crohn’s disease share histologic features with celiac disease, namely villous blunting and intraepithelial lymphocytosis. Peptic duodenitis typically occurs in the setting of gastric Helicobacter pylori infection or reactive gastropathy due to NSAIDs or other gastric irritants. Intraepithelial lymphocytes are only minimally increased and foveolar metaplasia of the surface epithelium is almost uniformly seen. Tropical sprue is a rare disorder that is thought to be due to an unidentified microbe. It displays all of the features of celiac disease, although they may be more pronounced in the ileum compared to the duodenum.13 Patients with common variable immunodeficiency have markedly decreased levels of circulating immunoglobulins, and biopsy samples throughout the gastrointestinal tract may display a decrease or absence of plasma cells.14 Autoimmune enteropathy is more common in young males who may have circulating autoantibodies to goblet cells or parietal cells. Biopsy samples may also display loss of goblet cells or parietal cells.15 Finally, Crohn disease is characterized by abnormal chronic (lymphocytes, plasma cells) and active (neutrophil-rich) intestinal inflammation, and architectural remodeling. Non-necrotic epithelioid granulomas are the most helpful diagnostic findings, but this feature is inconsistently present.

What Is the Natural History of Celiac Disease?

The vast majority of patients experience resolution of signs and symptoms of celiac disease shortly after gluten withdrawal. Only 1% to 2% experience refractory celiac disease defined as persistent or recurrent symptoms despite adherence to gluten-free diet for 6 to 12 months. Refractory celiac disease comprises 2 subgroups; intraepithelial T cells display normal coexpression of CD3 and CD8 in type 1 refractory celiac disease, whereas CD8 expression is lost in type 2 disease.16 The latter group is at risk for progression to enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, an aggressive malignancy with <20% five-year overall survival.17 The risk of intestinal lymphoma is 6 to 7-fold higher in patients with celiac disease compared to the general population.18 So-called “collagenous sprue” is a pattern of injury that may be seen in refractory celiac disease (Figure 4), but can also be seen in patients with hypersensitivity to other dietary proteins or, rarely, as a hypersensitivity reaction to angiotensin II receptor antagonists.19 Thus, this pattern is not necessarily indicative of gluten sensitivity and patients with the finding of collagenous sprue may or may not benefit from gluten withdrawal. Patients with long-standing, untreated celiac disease are at more than 4-fold increased risk for small intestinal adenocarcinoma.20 Although the mechanism of carcinoma development is incompletely understood, recent studies suggest a role for mismatch repair deficiency in these cases.21

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Collagenous sprue. A, Duodenal mucosa with typical features of celiac disease and irregularly thickened subepithelial collagen (hematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification: 40×). B, A trichrome stain highlighting the thick and irregular subepithelial collagen with entrapped capillaries (original magnification 40×).

What Is the Role of Gluten-Free Diet on the Treatment of Celiac Disease?

At present, gluten-free diet is the only effective treatment for celiac disease. Gluten-free diet is a diet that strictly excludes gluten, a composite of storage proteins termed prolamins and glutelins found in wheat, barley, rye, oat, and other related grains. Strict adherence to the gluten-free diet can help to meet the therapeutic goals in almost all patients with celiac disease. However, adhering to a gluten-free diet is challenging, especially for young adults. Many factors including cultural background, social isolation, financial burden of purchasing gluten-free foods, and incorrect/lack of food labeling have contributed to the nonadherence. Regular dietetic follow-up and utilization of gluten-free food database can be helpful to improve adherence.22,23

Adoption of gluten-free diets and consumption of gluten-free foods have risen substantially in the United States over the past 3 decades.24 This is due, in part, to increased awareness of celiac disease. Elimination of gluten and wheat from the diet alleviates gastrointestinal symptoms in some individuals who do not have celiac disease. These groups are now said to have nonceliac gluten sensitivity and nonceliac wheat sensitivity, respectively.25,26 Emerging evidence suggests that avoidance of gluten may benefit patients with certain psychiatric disorders, atopic diseases, endometriosis, and fibromyalgia.24 The gluten-free lifestyle is also gaining popularity among healthy individuals. Although gluten avoidance may contribute to weight loss, other health benefits have not been convincingly shown. Indeed, some evidence suggests that gluten-free diets exacerbate cardiovascular disease by reducing intake of beneficial whole grains.27

Teaching Points

  1. Celiac disease is a multifactorial disorder that demonstrates the interplay between genetic and environmental factors in immune-mediated diseases.

  2. The diagnosis of celiac disease relies upon serologic evaluation of increased antibodies against TTG, EMA, and DGP; duodenal biopsy confirmation of villous shortening/blunting; intraepithelial lymphocytosis; crypt hyperplasia; and clinical evaluation of patient’s response to gluten-free diet. This underscores the importance of interdisciplinary communication in the management of gastrointestinal disorders.

  3. Like many gastrointestinal disorders, celiac disease has extraintestinal manifestations related to immune dysregulation, such as dermatitis herpetiformis, and nutritional deficiencies such as iron-deficiency anemia.

  4. Celiac disease displays a spectrum of histologic abnormalities ranging from normal mucosal histology and villous architecture, to mild intraepithelial lymphocytic infiltration and partial villous atrophy, to marked lymphocytosis and total villous blunting, related to disease duration and severity. 5. Recognition of celiac disease is clinically important since gluten withdrawal is the only effective therapy, and untreated disease can lead to potentially serious sequelae including severe malnutrition, lymphoma, and adenocarcinoma.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  • 1. Lau MS, Sanders DS. Optimizing the diagnosis of celiac disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2017;33:173–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Elitsur Y, Sigman T, Watkins R, et al. Tissue transglutaminase levels are not sufficient to diagnose celiac disease in North American practices without intestinal biopsies. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62:175–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rostami K, Kerckhaert J, Tiemessen R, von Blomberg BM, Meijer JW, Mulder CJ. Sensitivity of antiendomysium and antigliadin antibodies in untreated celiac disease: disappointing in clinical practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:888–894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Volta U, Caio G, Boschetti E, et al. Seronegative celiac disease: shedding light on an obscure clinical entity. Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48:1018–1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Stamnaes J, Sollid LM. Celiac disease: autoimmunity in response to food antigen. Semin Immunol. 2015;27:343–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Pagliari D, Urgesi R, Frosali S, et al. The interaction among microbiota, immunity, and genetic and dietary factors is the condicio sine qua non celiac disease can develop. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:123653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabo IR, et al. European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54:136–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Uenishi RH, Gandolfi L, Almeida LM, et al. Screening for celiac disease in 1st degree relatives: a 10-year follow-up study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014;14:36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Rubio-Tapia A, Ludvigsson JF, Brantner TL, Murray JA, Everhart JE. The prevalence of celiac disease in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1538–1544; quiz 1537, 1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Freeman HJ. Iron deficiency anemia in celiac disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:9233–9238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Collin P, Salmi TT, Hervonen K, Kaukinen K, Reunala T. Dermatitis herpetiformis: a cutaneous manifestation of coeliac disease. Ann Med. 2017;49:23–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Pai RK. A practical approach to small bowel biopsy interpretation: celiac disease and its mimics. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2014;31:124–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Brown IS, Bettington A, Bettington M, Rosty C. Tropical sprue: revisiting an underrecognized disease. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:666–672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Panarelli NC, Yantiss RK. Inflammatory and infectious manifestations of immunodeficiency in the gastrointestinal tract. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:844–861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Singhi AD, Goyal A, Davison JM, Regueiro MD, Roche RL, Ranganathan S. Pediatric autoimmune enteropathy: an entity frequently associated with immunodeficiency disorders. Mod Pathol. 2014;27:543–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Malamut G, Meresse B, Cellier C, Cerf-Bensussan N. Refractory celiac disease: from bench to bedside. Semin Immunopathol. 2012;34:601–613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Ondrejka S, Jagadeesh D. Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2016;11:504–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Smedby KE, Akerman M, Hildebrand H, Glimelius B, Ekbom A, Askling J. Malignant lymphomas in coeliac disease: evidence of increased risks for lymphoma types other than enteropathy-type T cell lymphoma. Gut. 2005;54:54–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Smyrk TC. Practical approach to the flattened duodenal biopsy. Surg Pathol Clin. 2017;10:823–839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ilus T, Kaukinen K, Virta LJ, Pukkala E, Collin P. Incidence of malignancies in diagnosed celiac patients: a population-based estimate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1471–1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Shenoy S. Genetic risks and familial associations of small bowel carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016;8:509–519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Samasca G, Lerner A, Girbovan A, et al. Challenges in gluten-free diet in coeliac disease: Prague consensus. Eur J Clin Invest. 2017;47:394–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hall NJ, Rubin G, Charnock A. Systematic review: adherence to a gluten-free diet in adult patients with coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:315–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Niland B, Cash BD. Health benefits and adverse effects of a gluten-free diet in non-celiac disease patients. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2018;14:82–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Staudacher HM, Lomer MC, Anderson JL, et al. Fermentable carbohydrate restriction reduces luminal bifidobacteria and gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. J Nutr. 2012;142:1510–1518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. de Roest RH, Dobbs BR, Chapman BA, et al. The low FODMAP diet improves gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a prospective study. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67:895–903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Potter MDE, Brienesse SC, Walker MM, Boyle A, Talley NJ. Effect of the gluten-free diet on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with coeliac disease: a systematic review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33:781–791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Academic Pathology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES