Abstract
Metabolic abnormalities is a hallmark of cancer. About 100 years ago, Nobel laureate Otto Heinrich Warburg first described high rate of glycolysis in cancer cells. Recently more and more novel opinions about cancer metabolism supplement to this hypothesis, consist of glucose uptake, lactic acid generation and secretion, acidification of the microenvironment and cancer immune evasion. Here we briefly review metabolic pathways generating lactate, and discuss the function of higher lactic acid in cancer microenvironments.
Keywords: Aerobic glycolysis, Cancer metabolism, Glucose metabolism, Immune escape, Lactate
Introduction
Tumor consists of multiple cell types, the surrounding microenvironment support cancer cells growth, migration, invasion, and metastasis. Different cancer cells coevolve through paracrine and exosomes communication.1, 2 Metabolic products of cancer cells also influence itself, other type cancer cells and immune cells in same microenvironment.
Metabolic abnormalities is a hallmark of cancer. Growing papers about the metabolism of cancer cells hint that aerobic glycolysis inhibitors and other new medications targeting metabolic enzyme have great potential to block cancer progress. According Warburg's hypothesis, cancer cells choose aerobic glycolysis as main mode of glucose metabolism instead of more efficient oxidative phosphorylation. Dysfunction of mitochondria, loss of tumor suppressors, the hypoxic microenvironment, and oncogene-driven metabolic reprogramming are initiating events of abnormal energy metabolism of cancer cells.3 In over 70% of human cancers, glycolytic genes are ubiquitously overexpressed.4, 5
Aerobic glycolysis only produces 2 ATP molecules per glucose molecule, it means cancer cells need uptake more glucose molecules from microenvironment to meet energy requirements, and secrets more lactic acids to microenvironment for the maintenance of cellular environment homeostasis. So, cancer metabolism and microenvironment have close interactions and relationships. In the current paper, the relationship between cancer metabolism and cancer microenvironment are discussed and analyzed.
Overexpressed glucose transporters
Uptake of glucose from microenvironment into cytoplasm occurs by facilitated the transport of glucose over a plasma membrane through glucose transporter/solute carrier (GLUT/SLC2A) family. GLUT family includes 14 membrane-bound proteins, named from GLUT1 to GLUT14.
Glucose uptake is a rate-limiting step in aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells. Under the condition of hypoxia, cancer cells frequently over-express GLUTs, especially GLUT1 and GLUT3. Tumor hypoxia microenvironment cause hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) containing HIF-1α and HIF-1β subunits overexpressed. HIF-1 has been proved to activate serval signal pathways in cancer cells. GLUT1 levels have been shown to increase with changes at both the mRNA and protein levels in hypoxic conditions. HIF-1 recognized as oxygen sensing up-regulate GLUT1 expression. An enhancer element lying 5′ to the Glut-1 gene could be activated by hypoxia, and found a distinct cis-acting sequences as a HIF-1 binding site to increase GLUT1 expression.6
Hypoxia microenvironment also lead to activation of NF-κB and hypoxia-inducible-1α (HIF-1α) pathways in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF). Basal-like CAFs secrete hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) which bind to c-met on cancer cell membrane, then upregulate glucose transporter expression.7
Both GLUT1 (Km = 6.9 mM)and GLUT3 (Km = 1.8 mM) have a high affinity for glucose.8 So cancer cells can efficiently plunder glucose, reduce glucose concentration in tumor microenvironment,9 subsequently influence the function of infiltrated immune cells.
Lactic acid biosynthesis and secretion
The Warburg effect present that cancer cells enhance aerobic glycolysis to generate energy and supply intermediate for macromolecule biosynthetic, including ribose-5-phosphate, glycine for nucleotide, or glycerol for lipid. Enhanced aerobic glycolysis do not mean aerobic oxidation and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle has been 100% blocked. Recent investigations has reported that the function of mitochondria in most cancers is intact.10, 11 Cancer cells also partly generate ATP by consume pyruvate and other TCA cycle intermediate. So, Warburg effect is essentially a consequence of an imbalance between maximum rates of glycolysis and pyruvate oxidation.12
In aerobic glycolysis, pyruvate is converted to lactic acid by lactic acid dehydrogenase-A (LDHA). The accumulation of lactic acids in cancer cells promotes lactic acid transport by the proton-linked monocarboxylate transporter (MCT), particularly MCT113 and MCT4.14, 15 These MCTs are found overexpressed to accelerate lactic acid secretion from cytoplasm to extracellular fluid. It makes pH dropped to 6.6 within the tumor microenvironment.16 The acidification of the microenvironment was mainly caused by lactic acid which secreted from cancer cells.17 Inhibitors of MCT1 such as a-cyano-4-OH-cinnamate (CHC) or lonidamine effectively inhibit the tumor growth in vivo studies,18, 19 and increase sensitivity to radiation therapy. It means that lactic acid exported from cancer cytoplasm to remove excess carbon and maintain NAPDH+ store is very important to tumor growth. And MCT1, MCT4 are potential therapeutic targets for cancer.
Lactic acid activates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF),20, 21 transforming growth factor beta (TGF beta),22 interleukin-1 (IL-1) and HIF-1 even in normoxic oxidative tumor cells. As described earlier, HIF-1 is a key regulator during glycose metabolism shift. So higher lactic acid can feed back to enhance glycolysis in cancer cells, cause a vicious circle. Higher VEGF further induces tumor angiogenesis, by stimulating endothelial cell migration and the recruitment of circulating vascular progenitor cells and vascular morphogenesis.
Energy waste and re-used
Tumor consists of a serial distinct subpopulation of cells. Cancer cells in hypoxic environment consume high levels glucose, using aerobic glycolysis as altered energy metabolism pathway, secrete high levels lactic acid out of cytoplasm. Cancer cell near blood vessels with plenty oxygen supplement, preferentially utilizes the lactic acid as their main energy source. So, Lactic acid is not a waste, it is re-used as energy vehicles, transfer energy among different cancer sub-populations.
Three models of lactic acid re-used in cancer microenvironment have been described: the “reverse Warburg effect”, metabolic symbiosis, and vascular endothelial cell shuttling. “Reverse Warburg effect” means cancer cells secret hydrogen peroxide to create a “pseudo-hypoxic” environment to activates HIF-1α, glycolysis, and MCT4 expression of stromal cells. The metabolism of glycoses of stromal cells shifts to aerobic glycolysis, and secrete lactic acid to microenvironment, in turn, the novel generated lactic acid are uptake by cancer as energy substrate. Metabolic symbiosis describe that lactic acid worked as a medium to transfer energy from highly glycolytic, hypoxic cancer cells to more oxidative cancer cells.
Acidification of the microenvironment and cancer immune evasion
The anti-cancer immune response has been known to be mediated by effector T-cells, which dependent on helper cells and cytokines in micro-environment. The tumor immunity also is influenced by the environmental pH, an acidic pH in microenvironment can markedly weaken response of immune cells.23 Modulation of microenvironment acidity towards physiological values reverses the anergy of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes.24
Aerobic glycolysis also is a mainly method which activated T cell generate energy.25 During T cell activation, T cells increase glucose uptake and glycolytic rate, by upregulating glycolytic enzymes, which generate more lactic acid to secrete into microenvironment. Lower pH and higher lactic acid concentration caused by tumor cells inhibit lactic acid secretion from T cell, and cause T cell be asphyxiated, then reduce proliferation and cytokine production by 95%.26 These effects are mediated by decreased MAPKs p38 and JNK/c-Jun phosphorylation of T cells.
Lactic acid also inhibits the innate immune through down-regulating the expression of LPS induced genes, delayed LPS-induced phosphorylation of AKT and the degradation of IKB. Pre-incubation with lactic acid following LPS stimulation significantly reduced TNF, IL-6 MCP-1, MIP-1a secretion. It means that higher lactic concentration might be play as a suppressive role.
Summary
Cancer cells have significant heterogeneity in glucose metabolism. Most cancer cells rely largely on aerobic glycolysis as it accounts for 56–63% of their ATP budget. So, cancer cells plunder more glucose from microenvironment and secrete more lactic acid to meet requirement of energy and material metabolism. This characteristic of cancer cells cause lower glucose concentration and higher acidity in tumor microenvironment, subsequently suppress infiltrated immune cells, contribute to tumor immune evasion. Development novel drugs which target glucose intake, aerobic glycolysis, or lactic acid secretion of cancer cells might engender double effects: inhibition of tumor cells and recovering immune response.
Conflict of interest
The author has none to declare.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of Chongqing Medical University.
Supplementary data related to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2017.02.003.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the supplementary data related to this article:
References
- 1.Roma-Rodrigues C., Fernandes A.R., Baptista P.V. Exosome in tumour microenvironment: overview of the crosstalk between normal and cancer cells. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:179486. doi: 10.1155/2014/179486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schlereth S.L., Refaian N., Iden S., Cursiefen C., Heindl L.M. Impact of the prolymphangiogenic crosstalk in the tumor microenvironment on lymphatic cancer metastasis. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:639058. doi: 10.1155/2014/639058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kroemer G., Pouyssegur J. Tumor cell metabolism: cancer's Achilles' heel. Cancer Cell. Jun 2008;13(6):472–482. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Altenberg B., Greulich K.O. Genes of glycolysis are ubiquitously overexpressed in 24 cancer classes. Genomics. 2004;84(6):1014–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2004.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Martins S.F., Amorim R., Viana-Pereira M. Significance of glycolytic metabolism-related protein expression in colorectal cancer, lymph node and hepatic metastasis. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:535. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2566-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ebert B.L., Firth J.D., Ratcliffe P.J. Hypoxia and mitochondrial inhibitors regulate expression of glucose transporter-1 via distinct cis-acting sequences. J Biol Chem. Dec 8 1995;270(49):29083–29089. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.49.29083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brauer H.A., Makowski L., Hoadley K.A. Impact of tumor microenvironment and epithelial phenotypes on metabolism in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. Feb 1 2013;19(3):571–585. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shepherd P.R., Kahn B.B. Glucose transporters and insulin action — implications for insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(4):248–257. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199907223410406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Michalopoulou E., Bulusu V., Kamphorst J.J. Metabolic scavenging by cancer cells: when the going gets tough, the tough keep eating. Br J Cancer. Sep 6 2016;115(6):635–640. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Scott D.A., Richardson A.D., Filipp F.V. Comparative metabolic flux profiling of melanoma cell lines: beyond the Warburg effect. J Biol Chem. Dec 9 2011;286(49):42626–42634. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.282046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hsu P.P., Sabatini D.M. Cancer cell metabolism: Warburg and beyond. Cell. 2008;134(5):703–707. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.DeBerardinis R.J. Is cancer a disease of abnormal cellular metabolism? New angles on an old idea. Genet Med. Nov 2008;10(11):767–777. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31818b0d9b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Miranda-Goncalves V., Granja S., Martinho O. Hypoxia-mediated upregulation of MCT1 expression supports the glycolytic phenotype of glioblastomas. Oncotarget. Jun 16 2016:46335–46353. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Andersen A.P., Flinck M., Oernbo E.K., Pedersen N.B., Viuff B.M., Pedersen S.F. Roles of acid-extruding ion transporters in regulation of breast cancer cell growth in a 3-dimensional microenvironment. Mol Cancer. 2016;15(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12943-016-0528-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Miranda-Goncalves V., Honavar M., Pinheiro C. Monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) in gliomas: expression and exploitation as therapeutic targets. Neuro-oncology. Feb 2013;15(2):172–188. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barar J., Omidi Y. Dysregulated pH in tumor microenvironment checkmates cancer therapy. BioImpacts. 2013;3(4):149–162. doi: 10.5681/bi.2013.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gottfried E., Kunz-Schughart L.A., Ebner S. Tumor-derived lactic acid modulates dendritic cell activation and antigen expression. Blood. Mar 1 2006;107(5):2013–2021. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-05-1795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fang J., Quinones Q.J., Holman T.L. The H+-linked monocarboxylate transporter (MCT1/SLC16A1): a potential therapeutic target for high-risk neuroblastoma. Mol Pharmacol. Dec 2006;70(6):2108–2115. doi: 10.1124/mol.106.026245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sonveaux P., Copetti T., De Saedeleer C.J. Targeting the lactate transporter MCT1 in endothelial cells inhibits lactate-induced HIF-1 activation and tumor angiogenesis. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Giatromanolaki A., Sivridis E., Gatter K.C. Lactate dehydrogenase 5 (LDH-5) expression in endometrial cancer relates to the activated VEGF/VEGFR2(KDR) pathway and prognosis. Gynecol Oncol. Dec 2006;103(3):912–918. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kumar V.B., Viji R.I., Kiran M.S., Sudhakaran P.R. Endothelial cell response to lactate: implication of PAR modification of VEGF. J Cell Physiol. May 2007;211(2):477–485. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yalamanchi N., Klein M.B., Pham H.M., Longaker M.T., Chang J. Flexor tendon wound healing in vitro: lactate up-regulation of TGF-beta expression and functional activity. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 2004;113(2):625–632. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000101529.47062.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lardner A. The effects of extracellular pH on immune function. J Leukoc Biol. 2001;69(4):522–530. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Calcinotto A., Filipazzi P., Grioni M. Modulation of microenvironment acidity reverses anergy in human and murine tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes. Cancer Res. Jun 1 2012;72(11):2746–2756. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chang C.H., Curtis J.D., Maggi L.B., Jr. Posttranscriptional control of T cell effector function by aerobic glycolysis. Cell. Jun 6 2013;153(6):1239–1251. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fischer K., Hoffmann P., Voelkl S. Inhibitory effect of tumor cell-derived lactic acid on human T cells. Blood. May 1 2007;109(9):3812–3819. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-035972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.