Skip to main content
Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B logoLink to Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B
. 2018 Sep;19(9):699–707. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1700298

Use of cationic microbubbles targeted to P-selectin to improve ultrasound-mediated gene transfection of hVEGF165 to the ischemic myocardium*

Wei-hui Shentu 1,§, Cao-xin Yan 1,§, Chun-mei Liu 1, Rui-xiang Qi 2, Yao Wang 1, Zhao-xu Huang 1, Li-ming Zhou 1, Xiang-dong You 1,†,
PMCID: PMC6137414  PMID: 30178636

Abstract

Gene therapies have been applied to the treatment of cardiovascular disease, but their use is limited by the need to deliver them to the right target. We have employed targeted contrast ultrasound-mediated gene transfection (TCUMGT) via ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD) to transfer therapeutic genes to specific anatomic and pathological targets. Phospholipid microbubbles (MBs) with pcDNA3.1-human vascular endothelial growth factor 165 (pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165) plasmids targeted to P-selectin (MB+P+VEGFp) were created by conjugating monoclonal antibodies against P-selectin to the lipid shell. These microbubbles were divided into four groups: microbubble only (MB), microbubble+P-selectin (MB+P), microbubble+pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 plasmid (MB+VEGFp), and microbubble+P-selectin+pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 plasmid (MB+P+VEGFp). The reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) results showed that the VEGF gene was successfully transfected by TCUMGT and the efficiency is increased with P-selectin targeting moiety. UTMD-mediated delivery of VEGF increased myocardial vascular density and improved cardiac function, and MB+P+VEGFp delivery showed greater improvement than MB+VEGFp. This study drew support from TCUGMT technology and took advantage of targeted ultrasound contrast agent to identify ischemic myocardium, release pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 recombinant plasmid, and improve the myocardial microenvironment, so promoting the restoration of myocardial function.

Keywords: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), P-selectin, Targeted contrast ultrasound-mediated gene transfection, Heart function

1. Introduction

New anti-myocardial ischemia medicines and the development of coronary artery bypass surgery have significantly improved the quality of life for patients suffering from coronary disease. However, these methods still cannot save dead myocardial cells, restore myocardium, or improve ventricular diastolic and systolic function. Gene therapy has been shown to reduce adverse cardiac remodeling and can improve recovery of ventricular function as well as enhance cell survival and angiogenesis (Yau et al., 2001; Bekeredjian et al., 2005), but the efficiency of gene delivery to target tissues still limits its application. In recent years, targeted contrast ultrasound-mediated gene transfection (TCUMGT) has shown promise for organ-specific gene and drug delivery (Bekeredjian et al., 2005). TCUMGT can transfer therapeutic genes via a microbubble contrast agent to specific anatomic and pathological targets (Sirsi and Borden, 2012). After being injected intravenously into target tissues, the agent will undergo cavitation because of the ultrasound energy (ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction, UTMD) with increased gaps between the target organ endothelial cells and capillary permeability, and its encapsulated genes are released in a particular orientation to the extravascular matrix of target tissue, hence uplifting the partial concentration and increasing the cell ingestion of genes (Ferrara et al., 2007; Sirsi and Borden, 2012).

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a kind of highly specific and strong vascular endothelial cell mitogenic and angiogenic factor, which can regulate most links in angiogenesis, including endothelial extracellular matrix dissolution and migration. It can also act directly on vascular endothelial cells in a specific manner to trigger endothelial cell proliferation, hence playing the role of “triggering” in angiogenesis (Hoeben et al., 2004). Humans have at least five types of VEGF consisting of 121, 145, 165, 186, and 206 amino acids. As VEGF165 has the greatest biological effect (Hoeben et al., 2004), its gene has been developed for cardiac function restoration after myocardial infarction. However, as VEGF concentration in blood is not maintained after injection (Douvaras et al., 2009), TCUMGT can be a powerful approach to deliver the organ-specific gene and drugs.

Acute myocardial ischemia-reperfusion can lead to the up-regulation of leucocyte adhesion molecules in blood vessel endothelium until ischemia alleviation. Studies demonstrated that the expression of P-selectin occurs in blood vessel endothelium within several minutes of ischemia-reperfusion. After ischemia alleviation, adhesion molecules can stick to the vascular walls, leaving “marks” of ischemia (Zhao et al., 2003). Xie et al. (2012) reported that the transfection of complementary DNA (cDNA) using ultrasound to destroy P-selectin-targeted cDNA gene microbubble for located release at lower limb ischemic muscles of rats was effective. We therefore constructed P-selectin-targeted and pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 plasmid-coupled cationic microbubbles (CMBs) to test the hypothesis that their use improves ultrasound-mediated gene transfection of hVEGF165 to the ischemic myocardium.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Preparation of cationic microbubbles

Biotinylated CMBs were prepared by adding disaturated phosphatidylcholine, polyethylene glycol (PEG) 40 stearate, and distearoylphosphatidyleth-anolamine-PEG2000-biotin (Avanti Polar Lipids, USA) to aqueous suspension. The CMB suspension was prepared by sonication with octafluoropropane (C3F8) gas (Shengtang Gas, China). The P-selectin-targeted microbubbles were prepared by conjugating biotin rat anti-mouse P-selectin to the surface of biotinylated microbubbles using a streptavidin link (Lindner et al., 2001). The plasmid (50 μg) was then coupled to the CMBs (1×108 microbubbles) by incubation for 15 min (Christiansen et al., 2003; Xie et al., 2012). The structure of the CMB is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Structure of P-selectin-targeted and pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 plasmid-coupled cationic microbubble

PEG: polyethylene glycol

2.2. CMB characterization

The mean diameter and zeta potential of the CMBs were measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern, UK). The targeted microbubbles were subjected to fluorescent-targeted secondary antibodies against the targeting moiety. Plasmid and the antibody conjugation to P-selectin was observed using fluorescence microscopy (CKX41; Olympus, Japan).

2.3. Animal model

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (weight 200–225 g; n=4 per group) were obtained from Taconic Biosciences (Hudson, NY, USA). The left anterior coronary artery of the rat was occluded for 60 min under general anesthesia to generate ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) and followed by reperfusion (Fujii et al., 2011). The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China approved all animal procedures.

2.4. UTMD delivery

The UTMD delivery procedure was performed 5 d after I/R as previously reported (Sun et al., 2013). The microbubble solution (1.2 ml/h) was infused into the tail vein of the sedated rats (2% isoflurane). Simultaneously, ultrasound pulses were delivered for 20 min using a Vivid 7 system (GE Healthcare, USA) with an M3S transducer. The ultrasound system was operated in the second harmonic mode with an electrocardiograph trigger. Pulsing interval was adjusted to allow for complete myocardium replenishment of microbubbles between bursts. After each treatment, rats were recovered.

2.5. ELISA

Seven days after TCUMGT treatment, peripheral blood was collected and plasma was harvested after centrifugation. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to detect the content of VEGF according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.6. RT-PCR

Seven days after TCUMGT treatment, infarcted myocardium cells were collected and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and RNA was extracted using RNeasy Plus Micro Kit (QIAGEN, USA). Then, cDNA was synthesized with Revert AIDTM First Strand cDNA Synthesis (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed with Applied Biosystems 7500 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA) under the following conditions: 95 °C for 30 s, 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 34 s for a total of 45 cycles. The messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of VEGF was detected by PCR with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as an internal reference. Primers were synthesized in TaKaRa (Dalian, China). All data are displayed as the mean±standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments.

2.7. Preparation of sections of frozen heart tissue

The hearts were perfused with normal saline and removed from euthanized animals. They were then snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. The 10-μm slides were sectioned from the frozen tissue and cells were confirmed by green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression under fluorescent microscopy.

2.8. Vascular density measurement

Sections of the infarct border region were obtained on Day 21 after I/R and double immunofluorescent staining for α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and factor VIII (Kelly et al., 2015). The primary antibodies used for immunofluorescence analysis were as follows: Cy3-conjugated mouse anti-α-SMA (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and mouse anti-human factor VIII (Ray Biotech, USA). The appropriate secondary antibodies for α-SMA and factor VIII were obtained from Invitrogen (USA). 4'-6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was used to counterstain the myocardium tissue. Capillaries and arterioles were quantified in six fields per slide under a fluorescent microscope (200×) and all data are displayed as the mean±SD. The mean number of vessels per 0.4 mm2 was taken to be the blood vessel density.

2.9. Myocardial function measurement

On the day of I/R, and then 5 and 21 d later, end-systolic and end-diastolic diameters and volumes of the left ventricle were evaluated using echocardiography. The left ventricular structural parameters were used in the calculation of left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricle fractional shortening (LVFS).

2.10. Statistical analysis

Data were presented as mean±SD. All experiments were repeated at least three times. Statistics were performed using a statistical software package (SPSS 13.0; SPSS, USA). Student’s t-test was used to compare the data between two groups; for multiple group comparison, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was performed. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of CMBs

The newly prepared CMBs were characterized by DLS. The results showed that they had a Zeta-potential of (23.25±1.58) mV and an average diameter of (4.12±0.92) μm (Fig. 2a). To confirm the conjugation of the P-selectin antibody and plasmid to the CMBs, the plasmid was labeled with the nucleotide-avid fluorophore YOYO-1 (green fluorescence, excitation/emission: 491/509 nm; Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and the P-selectin antibody was labeled with rhodamine mouse anti-human immunoglobulin (Ig) G (red fluorescence, excitation/emission: 550/570 nm; Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The plasmid and P-selectin antibody were observed under a fluorescence microscope. CMBs subjected to fluorescent-targeted secondary antibodies were bright green or red under fluorescence microscopy, suggesting that the CMBs were conjugated with the plasmids or P-selectin antibody with high efficiency (Fig. 2b). The merged view of CMBs fluoresced yellow, confirming that both plasmids and P-selectin are colocalized to the same CMB.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Characterization of cationic lipid-shelled decafluorobutane microbubbles

(a) Dynamic light scattering measurements of the mean diameter and Zeta-potential of the cationic microbubbles (CMBs). (b) P-selectin antibody and pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 plasmid targeted microbubbles as observed under a fluorescent microscope (×100 magnification) to show the nucleotide-avid fluorophore YOYO-1 and rhodamine mouse anti-human immunoglobulin (Ig) G labeled microbubbles. The merged view was shown

3.2. Effect of TCUMGT of pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 on myocardial levels of VEGF165

The TCUMGT was performed 5 d after I/R. We used the pAcGFP1 vector (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) to study the transfection efficiency of microbubbles with P-selectin targeting, and prepared CMBs into four groups: microbubble only (MB), microbubble+P-selectin (MB+P), microbubble+pAcGFP1 vector (MB+GFPp), and microbubble+P-selectin+pAcGFP1 vector (MB+P+GFPp). The CMBs in the four groups were delivered 5 d after I/R and released with UTMD. Frozen sections were prepared and GFP expression within the myocardium was measured under fluorescent microscopy 7 d after gene delivery (Figs. 3a–3d). The intensity of GFP-positive cells in heart tissue was significantly greater with MB+P+GFPp than with MB+GFPp delivery (Fig. 3e; P<0.01). To evaluate delivery of the therapeutic pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 gene into the myocardium, the microbubble groups were set as microbubble only (MB), microbubble+P-selectin (MB+P), microbubble+pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 plasmid (MB+VEGFp), and microbubble+P-selectin+pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 plasmid (MB+P+VEGFp). Each group was divided into two subgroups (n=4 per subgroup): one for VEGF165 expression studies and one for myocardial vascular density and cardiac function studies. The expression levels of VEGF165 protein in the infarcted myocardium and peripheral blood were determined by RT-PCR (Fig. 3f) and ELISA (Fig. 3g) 7 d following UTMD-mediated plasmid delivery. As shown in Figs. 3c and 3d, VEGF165 protein levels were significantly higher with MB+P+VEGFp than with MB+VEGFp delivery (P<0.01), suggesting that VEGF gene transfection by UTMD was successful and that the efficiency is increased with P-selectin targeting moiety.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Effect of TCUMGT of pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 on myocardial levels of VEGF165

(a–d) Presence of GFP-positive cells in injured myocardium. GFP-positive spots were detected under fluorescent microscopy (×200 magnification). (e) Relative fluorescence intensity of GFP-positive cells in different groups. (f) The mRNA expression levels of VEGF165 in the infarcted myocardium and (g) the protein expression levels of VEGF165 in the peripheral blood determined by RT-PCR and ELISA, respectively, 7 d following UTMD-mediated plasmid delivery. MB: microbubble only (control); MB+P: microbubble+P-selectin; MB+VEGFp: microbubble+pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 plasmid; MB+P+VEGFp: microbubble+P-selectin+pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 plasmid. Data are expressed as mean±SD (n=3). ** P<0.01 vs. MB group; # P<0.05 vs. MB+VEGFp group

3.3. Effect of TCUMGT of pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 on myocardial vascular density and cardiac function

At 21 d after I/R (16 d after TCUMGT), we stained the infarct border region with factor VIII and α-SMA immunofluorescent staining to identify the small (mainly capillaries) and larger (arterioles) vascular structures, respectively. As shown in Fig. 4, the densities of both types of vessel were significantly increased in the MB+P+VEGFp compared with the MB+VEGFp delivery groups (P<0.01). These results further proved that the VEGF gene was transfected by UTMD, the efficiency increasing with the P-selectin targeting moiety.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Blood vessel density and myocardial function following UTMD-mediated pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 delivery

(a) The infarct border region was immunofluorescent-labeled with α-SMA or factor VIII (×200 magnification); (b, c) Relative fluorescence intensities of α-SMA (b) and factor VIII (c) were detected. The densities of arteriolar (b) and capillary (c) vessels within the border region of the infarct were significantly increased with MB+P+VEGFp compared with the MB+VEGFp delivery. Ejection fraction (d) and fractional shortening (e) were determined by echocardiographic examination. Data are expressed as mean±SD (n=3). * P<0.05, ** P<0.01 vs. MB group; # P<0.05 vs. MB+VEGFp group. EF, ejection fraction; FS, fractional shortening

Cardiac function was evaluated by echocardiography (Figs. 4d and 4e). Before I/R (Day 0), the ejection fraction (Fig. 4d) was at approximately 63% in all groups. Prior to gene delivery, it decreased to approximately 52% at 5 d after I/R. However, the ejection fraction was significantly increased in the MB+P+VEGFp and MB+VEGFp delivery groups compared with the MB or MB+P controls at 21 d after I/R (P<0.05). The greatest improvement was seen in the MB+P+VEGFp delivery group (P<0.05 vs. MB+VEGFp). A similar pattern was seen in the fractional shortening results (Fig. 4e). At Day 0, fractional shortening of about 34% was exhibited in all groups, which decreased to approximately 24% at 5 d after I/R. At 21 d after I/R, MB+P+VEGFp delivery showed the greatest improvement in fractional shortening (P<0.05 vs. MB+VEGFp).

4. Discussion

Following myocardial infarction (MI), ventricular dysfunction and heart failure are the major causes of morbidity and mortality (Sutton et al., 1997; Sutton and Sharpe, 2000; Sun et al., 2013). In recent years, intravascular gene therapy has been applied to prevent adverse ventricular remodeling after MI with promising results (Jessup et al., 2011; Sun et al., 2013). However, the efficiency of gene delivery is a major limiting factor. In this study, biotinylated CMBs were constructed, which carry a positive surface charge and can combine with negatively charged cDNA through electrostatic interaction, and can also combine with target-substrate antibodies through biotin-avidin interaction via PEG on the microbubble surface (Xie et al., 2012; Unger et al., 2014). Xie et al. (2012) reported the effective transfection of cDNA using ultrasound to cavitate P-selectin-targeted cDNA gene microbubbles for located release of lower limb ischemic muscles in rats. In our study, we took advantage of the microbubbles, conjugating biotin rat anti-mouse P-selectin to the surface of biotinylated microbubbles using a streptavidin link to construct P-selectin-targeted microbubbles, and coupling functional plasmids to the CMBs (Fig. 1). The CMBs prepared in this study exhibit a positively charged surface ((23.25±1.58) mV) and an average diameter of (4.12±0.92) μm, which is suitable for the delivery system. Also, both plasmids and P-selectin can be properly colocalized to the same CMB in order to take full advantage of the targeted delivery property of the microbubbles.

Acute myocardial ischemia-reperfusion can lead to the up-regulation of adhesion molecules in blood vessel endothelium until ischemia alleviation. Many studies have shown that the ischemic area can be identified earlier by connecting antibodies of specific adhesion molecules to the microbubble surface enabling them to reach tissues or organs of interest by associating selectively with corresponding adhesion molecules (Leung, 2004; Liu et al., 2012; Xie et al., 2012). Lindner et al. (2001) and Hu et al. (2016) compared P-selectin monoclonal antibody with the control group and concluded that the stay time of microbubbles inside ischemic area could be significantly increased, with enhanced ultrasound signal strength. Among the various adhesion molecules, P-selectin is distinguished by quick expression on the surface of blood vessel endothelium even in the case of slight ischemia, and continuous up-regulation for several hours (Liu et al., 2012). It has been demonstrated that P-selectin monoclonal antibody contrast agent selectively adheres to blood vessel endothelium in ischemic tissue and generates signals in heart, brain, and kidney ischemia reperfusion injury models (Lindner et al., 2001; Takalkar et al., 2004; Ferrante et al., 2009). These studies have provided the foundation for studying the identification of ischemic myocardium with the goal of targeting therapy at an early stage. Therefore, in this study, we prepared CMB bearing a P-selectin targeting moiety. To investigate the transfection efficiency of microbubbles with P-selectin targeting, a GFP-containing plasmid, pAcGFP1, was coupled to the CMBs. Our results showed that the fluorescence intensity of GFP-positive cells in heart tissue 12 d after I/R was significantly greater with the MB+P+GFPp than with MB+GFPp delivery. This indicates that microbubbles with P-selectin targeting can efficiently target P-selectin on vascular walls induced by ischemia-reperfusion.

Recently, VEGF protein has received great attention in cardiac function restoration after MI. VEGF is involved in the induction of vascular endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis (Hoeben et al., 2004; Gerhardt, 2008). Yu et al. (2015) showed that combined myocardial mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and recombinant human VEGF165 plasmid injection could improve cardiac function. However, the direct injection method is associated with large myocardial damage and low bone mesenchymal stem cell (BMSC) survival rate, even causing death and arrhythmia, so it can only be conducted in coronary artery bypass grafting, limiting clinical application (Everaert et al., 2012). We chose TCUMGT as a safer and more effective means to deliver P-selectin-targeted pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 genes to the ischemic myocardium, promoting angiogenesis. The results showed that the VEGF gene was successfully transfected by UTMD and the efficiency was increased with P-selectin targeting moiety. Also, UTMD-mediated delivery of VEGF increased myocardial vascular density and improved cardiac function. This study drew support from TCUGMT technology and took advantage of targeted ultrasound contrast agent to identify ischemic myocardium, release pcDNA3.1-hVEGF165 recombinant plasmid, and improve the myocardial microenvironment, so promoting the restoration of myocardial function.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks go to Prof. You-bin DENG from Department of Ultrasonography, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, for his comments and suggestions in the writing process of the article.

Footnotes

*

Project supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. LY14H180003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81301231), and the General Research Project of Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education (No. Y201636244), China

Compliance with ethics guidelines: Wei-hui SHENTU, Cao-xin YAN, Chun-mei LIU, Rui-xiang QI, Yao WANG, Zhao-xu HUANG, Li-ming ZHOU, and Xiang-dong YOU declare that they have no conflict of interest.

All institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were followed.

References

  • 1.Bekeredjian R, Grayburn PA, Shohet RV. Use of ultrasound contrast agents for gene or drug delivery in cardiovascular medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(3):329–335. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Christiansen JP, French BA, Klibanov AL, et al. Targeted tissue transfection with ultrasound destruction of plasmid-bearing cationic microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29(12):1759–1767. doi: 10.1016/S0301-5629(03)00976-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Douvaras P, Antonatos DG, Kekou K, et al. Association of VEGF gene polymorphisms with the development of heart failure in patients after myocardial infarction. Cardiology. 2009;114(1):11–18. doi: 10.1159/000210189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Everaert BR, Bergwerf I, de Vocht N, et al. Multimodal in vivo imaging reveals limited allograft survival, intrapulmonary cell trapping and minimal evidence for ischemia-directed BMSC homing. BMC Biotechnol, 12:93. 2012 doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-12-93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ferrante EA, Pickard JE, Rychak J, et al. Dual targeting improves microbubble contrast agent adhesion to VCAM-1 and P-selectin under flow. J Control Release. 2009;140(2):100–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ferrara K, Pollard R, Borden M. Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:415–447. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fujii H, Li SH, Wu J, et al. Repeated and targeted transfer of angiogenic plasmids into the infarcted rat heart via ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction enhances cardiac repair. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(16):2075–2084. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gerhardt H. VEGF and endothelial guidance in angiogenic sprouting. Organogenesis. 2008;4(4):241–246. doi: 10.4161/org.4.4.7414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hoeben A, Landuyt B, Highley MS, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis. Pharmacol Rev. 2004;56(4):549–580. doi: 10.1124/pr.56.4.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hu DX, Liu XB, Song WC, et al. Roles of SIRT3 in heart failure: from bench to bedside. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol) 2016;17(11):821–830. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1600253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jessup M, Greenberg B, Mancini D, et al. Calcium upregulation by percutaneous administration of gene therapy in cardiac disease (CUPID): a phase 2 trial of intracoronary gene therapy of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase in patients with advanced heart failure. Circulation. 2011;124(3):304–313. doi: 10.1161/Circulationaha.111.022889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kelly S, Bombardieri M, Humby F, et al. Angiogenic gene expression and vascular density are reflected in ultrasonographic features of synovitis in early rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study. Arthritis Res Ther, 17:58. 2015 doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0567-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Leung K. Microbubbles Coated with Antibody to Intracellular Adhesion Molecule-1. National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, USA; 2004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lindner JR, Song J, Christiansen J, et al. Ultrasound assessment of inflammation and renal tissue injury with microbubbles targeted to P-selectin. Circulation. 2001;104(17):2107–2112. doi: 10.1161/hc4201.097061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu J, Zhang P, Liu P, et al. Endothelial adhesion of targeted microbubbles in both small and great vessels using ultrasound radiation force. Mol Imaging. 2012;11(1):58–66. doi: 10.2310/7290.2011.00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sirsi SR, Borden MA. Advances in ultrasound mediated gene therapy using microbubble contrast agents. Theranostics. 2012;2(12):1208–1222. doi: 10.7150/thno.4306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sun L, Huang CW, Wu J, et al. The use of cationic microbubbles to improve ultrasound-targeted gene delivery to the ischemic myocardium. Biomaterials. 2013;34(8):2107–2116. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sutton MGS, Sharpe N. Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: pathophysiology and therapy. Circulation. 2000;101(25):2981–2988. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.25.2981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sutton MSJ, Pfeffer MA, Moye L, et al. Cardiovascular death and left ventricular remodeling two years after myocardial infarction: baseline predictors and impact of long-term use of captopril: information from the survival and ventricular enlargement (SAVE) trial. Circulation. 1997;96(10):3294–3299. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.96.10.3294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Takalkar AM, Klibanov AL, Rychak JJ, et al. Binding and detachment dynamics of microbubbles targeted to P-selectin under controlled shear flow. J Control Release. 2004;96(3):473–482. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Unger E, Porter T, Lindner J, et al. Cardiovascular drug delivery with ultrasound and microbubbles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:110–126. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xie A, Belcik T, Qi Y, et al. Ultrasound-mediated vascular gene transfection by cavitation of endothelial-targeted cationic microbubbles. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(12):1253–1262. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yau TM, Fung K, Weisel RD, et al. Enhanced myocardial angiogenesis by gene transfer with transplanted cells. Circulation. 2001;104(S1):I–218-I-222. doi: 10.1161/circ.104.suppl_1.I-218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yu Q, Fang WY, Zhu N, et al. Beneficial effects of intramyocardial mesenchymal stem cells and VEGF165 plasmid injection in rats with furazolidone induced dilated cardiomyopathy. J Cell Mol Med. 2015;19(8):1868–1876. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhao ZQ, Corvera JS, Halkos ME, et al. Inhibition of myocardial injury by ischemic postconditioning during reperfusion: comparison with ischemic preconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285(2):H579–H588. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01064.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B are provided here courtesy of Zhejiang University Press

RESOURCES