Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2018 May 29;172(7):696–697. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.0263

Incidence of 4 Lysosomal Storage Disorders From 4 Years of Newborn Screening

Patrick V Hopkins 1,, Tracy Klug 1, Lacey Vermette 1, Julie Raburn-Miller 2, Jami Kiesling 2, Sharmini Rogers 2
PMCID: PMC6137509  PMID: 29813145

Abstract

This study describes the incidence rates for 4 lysosomal storage disorders from 4 years of full-population testing of all newborns in Missouri.


Newborn screening is recognized as a highly effective public health program to detect certain diseases before detrimental long-term health consequences occur. With advances in screening technologies and therapeutic options becoming available, the US Department of Health and Human Services recently added 2 lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs), Pompe disease and mucopolysaccharidosis I (MPS I), to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel.1 In addition, several states have legislative mandates to screen for other LSDs not on the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel. The Missouri State Public Health Laboratory has used a fluorimetric enzyme activity test on a digital microfluidic platform to screen all samples from newborns that were received since January 11, 2013, for Pompe, MPS I, Gaucher, and Fabry disorders.2 We herein present our findings on incidence rates for these LSDs from 4 years of full-population testing. These results represent, to our knowledge, the longest prospective, unblinded, full-population testing and follow-up for these LSDs in the United States.

Methods

Enzyme activity for acid α-glucosidase deficiency (Pompe disease), acid α-galactosidase deficiency (Fabry disease), acid β-glucocerebrosidase deficiency (Gaucher disease), and acid α-l-iduronidase deficiency (MPS I) was measured from dried blood spots using a fluorescence enzyme assay on the digital microfluidic platform (Baebies, Inc) as previously described.2,3 Missouri newborn specimens received for screening from January 11, 2013, through January 10, 2017, were tested; approximately 308 000 newborns were screened. All 4 LSDs were screened simultaneously from a single newborn dried blood spot sample. Samples with positive findings (with mean triplicate screening values breaching referral cutoff limits for 1 of the LSDs) were referred to 1 of 4 state-contracted genetic referral centers for confirmatory testing and follow-up. The Department of Health and Senior Services received approval from the Institutional Review Board Committee after a full review to waive informed parental consent for the LSD implementation. Missouri had a legislative mandate to screen for LSDs and full population screening would be conducted on every infant equally with referral of positive screening results to our contracted genetic referral centers for follow-up confirmatory testing and treatment if needed.

Results

We identified 133 newborns who were confirmed through diagnostic testing results to have 1 of the 4 LSDs (Table), including 32 with Pompe disease (8 infantile and 24 late-onset), 5 with Gaucher disease, 94 with Fabry disease, and 2 with MPS I. An additional 19 infants were confirmed to have genotypes of unknown significance or onset. These infants need continual follow-up to monitor for potential late-onset disorders. The Table also includes the number of newborns identified with pseudodeficiency, as carriers, or with false-positive findings (confirmatory enzyme activity was in the reference range, and no DNA testing was conducted). False-positive rates ([pseudodeficient + carrier + false-positive findings]/total number screened), incidence rates (confirmed disorder/total number screened), and positive predictive values ([confirmed disorders + genotypes of unknown significance]/number with positive screen results) were also calculated.

Table. Results From 4 Years of Full-Population Newborn Dried Blood Spot Screening in Missouria.

Lysosomal Storage Disease Positive Screen Result Confirmed Disorder Genotypes of Unknown Significance or Onset Pseudodeficiency Carrier False-Positive Findings (False-Positive Rate, %)b Lost to Follow-up or Refused Further Testing Incidence in Missouric Positive Predictive Value,d %
Pompe 161 32e 9 31 39 48 (0.04) 2 1:9625 26
Gaucher 37 5 2 0 6 22 (0.01) 2 1:61 600 20
Fabry 179 94 6 1 0 66 (0.02) 12 1:3277 60
MPS I 133 2 2 71 8 45 (0.04) 5 1:154 000 3
All 510 133 19 103 53 181 21 1:2316 NA

Abbreviations: MPS I, mucopolysaccharidosis I; NA, not applicable.

a

Includes approximately 308 000 newborns undergoing screening. Unless otherwise indicated, data are expressed as numbers of newborns.

b

Calculated as those with pseudodeficient, carrier, and false-positive findings divided by the total number screened.

c

Includes only confirmed disorders.

d

Calculated as those with confirmed disorders and genotypes of unknown significance or onset divided by the number with positive screen results.

e

Includes 8 infantile and 24 late onset.

Discussion

We report findings from, to our knowledge, the longest unblinded, full-population, prospective study of 4 LSDs in the United States. Although many pilot studies have been performed on blinded samples, Taiwan has the only other collection of newborn screening programs worldwide that has performed population screening for Pompe and Fabry diseases with clinical follow-up for a longer period.4 Incidence rates for Pompe and Fabry diseases in Missouri are similar to those reported in Taiwan, whereas the false-positive rates in Missouri are lower and positive predictive values are higher.4 Incidence rates for Pompe and Fabry disease in Missouri are also higher than recently published rates in Illinois.5 The incidence rates for Gaucher disease and MPS I are similar to those previously reported in other pilot studies.4,5 Rates of pseudodeficiency and genotypes of unknown significance for Pompe disease and MPS I are similar to published rates in Illinois.5 False-positive rates compare well with other newborn screening assays currently performed in Missouri. Missouri State Public Health Laboratory monitors for any false-negative cases, and to date we have had no reports of missed LSD cases. The fluorimetric multiplexed assay streamlines the workflow, makes efficient use of limited newborn screening materials, technical staff, and laboratory space, and allows a same-day turn-around time.

References

  • 1.Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). Recommended Uniform Screening Panel Core Conditions. https://www.hrsa.gov/advisorycommittees/mchbadvisory/heritabledisorders/recommendedpanel/uniformscreeningpanel.pdf. November 2016. Accessed November 1, 2017.
  • 2.Hopkins PV, Campbell C, Klug T, Rogers S, Raburn-Miller J, Kiesling J. Lysosomal storage disorder screening implementation: findings from the first six months of full population pilot testing in Missouri. J Pediatr. 2015;166(1):172-177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sista RS, Wang T, Wu N, et al. . Multiplex newborn screening for Pompe, Fabry, Hunter, Gaucher, and Hurler diseases using a digital microfluidic platform. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;424:12-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Matern D, Gavrilov D, Oglesbee D, Raymond K, Rinaldo P, Tortorelli S. Newborn screening for lysosomal storage disorders. Semin Perinatol. 2015;39(3):206-216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Burton BK, Charrow J, Hoganson GE, et al. . Newborn screening for lysosomal storage disorders in Illinois: the initial 15-month experience. J Pediatr. 2017;190:130-135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAMA Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES