Correction
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported that the modifications they requested to the data in Tables 1, 2 and 3 were incorrectly implemented due to a misunderstanding in mark-ups. Also, the titles of the tables should be modified as follows:
Table 1 Results of the average value ± standard deviation of each amino acid group listed in Fig. 5 → 4
Table 2 Results of the average value ± standard deviation of each amino acid group listed in Fig. 6 → 5
Table 3 Results of the average value ± standard deviation of each amino acid listed in Fig. 7 → 6
Table 1.
Results of the average value ± standard deviation of each amino acid group listed in Fig. 4
| Normal-aged | |||||
| Week | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Function | 189 ± 15 | 197 ± 20 | 197 ± 13 | 200 ± 11 | 194 ± 14 |
| Umami | 186 ± 32 | 148 ± 14 | 142 ± 13 | 128 ± 19 | 116 ± 20 |
| Sweet | 61 ± 11 | 48 ± 12 | 50 ± 12 | 55 ± 11 | 63 ± 16 |
| Savory | 140 ± 49 | 128 ± 26 | 126 ± 40 | 149 ± 30 | 179 ± 38 |
| Mold-aged | |||||
| Week | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Function | 171 ± 4 | 179 ± 8 | 189 ± 7 | 188 ± 6 | 186 ± 12 |
| Umami | 189 ± 7 | 176 ± 13 | 116 ± 18 | 102 ± 17 | 103 ± 12 |
| Sweet | 46 ± 2 | 43 ± 3 | 23 ± 3 | 18 ± 4 | 32 ± 11 |
| Savory | 87 ± 9 | 82 ± 8 | 62 ± 14 | 59 ± 19 | 124 ± 47 |
Table 2.
Results of the average value ± standard deviation of each amino acid group listed in Fig. 5
| Normal-aged | |||||
| Week | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Function | 148 ± 4 | 166 ± 20 | 185 ± 30 | 172 ± 16 | 167 ± 38 |
| Umami | 63 ± 6 | 66 ± 4 | 59 ± 14 | 43 ± 18 | 34 ± 10 |
| Sweet | 50 ± 13 | 55 ± 9 | 56 ± 8 | 59 ± 11 | 38 ± 10 |
| Savory | 100 ± 49 | 118 ± 43 | 126 ± 9 | 93 ± 36 | 54 ± 18 |
| Mold-aged | |||||
| Week | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Function | 141 ± 16 | 165 ± 15 | 235 ± 33 | 266 ± 25 | 315 ± 16 |
| Umami | 70 ± 14 | 51 ± 7 | 68 ± 7 | 92 ± 6 | 103 ± 4 |
| Sweet | 42 ± 3 | 32 ± 1 | 149 ± 31 | 252 ± 30 | 268 ± 15 |
| Savory | 50 ± 19 | 55 ± 4 | 337 ± 98 | 505 ± 103 | 472 ± 68 |
Table 3.
Results of the average value ± standard deviation of each amino acid listed in Fig. 6
| Normal-aged | |||||
| Week | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| GABA | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 |
| Aspartic acid | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 1 | 0 ± 1 |
| Proline | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 |
| Histidine | 6 ± 2 | 7 ± 2 | 8 ± 2 | 6 ± 1 | 3 ± 3 |
| Mold-aged | |||||
| Week | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| GABA | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 26 ± 11 | 42 ± 8 | 36 ± 14 |
| Aspartic acid | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 6 ± 3 | 16 ± 6 | 21 ± 4 |
| Proline | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 48 ± 15 | 90 ± 11 | 111 ± 10 |
| Histidine | 4 ± 1 | 4 ± 1 | 30 ± 11 | 60± 17 | 70± 17 |
The original article has been corrected.
The correct versions of the tables have been included in this correction.
Reference
- 1.Hanagasaki, Asato Changes in free amino acid content and hardness of beef while dry-aging with Mucor flavus. J Anim Sci Technol. 2018;60:19. doi: 10.1186/s40781-018-0176-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
