Expedited partner therapy (EPT) is an underused practice to address the record high rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States. There were more than 1.59 million reported cases of chlamydia in 2016, the highest number of annual cases of any condition ever reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).1
The continued increase in rates of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis is particularly surprising in light of the numerous gains that have been made in other areas of reproductive health. Access to contraception has increased, unintended pregnancy rates have decreased, age at first sexual activity has increased, and access to online health information has continued to improve; so why are STI rates worsening?2 The answer is not simple, although the lack of partner treatment plays an important role.
The transmission of undiagnosed STIs may result in persistent or recurrent infections and can cause serious health complications. Women are at increased risk for pelvic inflammatory disease, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility.3 Untreated STIs also increase the risk of HIV acquisition.4 Adolescent women aged 15 to 24 years accounted for 46% of reported chlamydia cases in 2016.1 Increasing rates among adolescents have the potential to diminish the reproductive health of future generations, as women with undiagnosed infections face serious health conquences.1 In addition to this epidemiological burden, STIs also carry a significant economic burden. The total direct cost of chlamydia and gonorrhea in 2008 was $516.7 million and $162.1 million, respectively (on the basis of 2010 US dollars).5
This continued increase in STIs has occurred despite several prevention and research programs and organizations dedicated to decreasing their prevalence and transmission (e.g., the Infertility Prevention Project, the CDC, HORIZONS, US Health and Human Services). The CDC recommends annual STI screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea for all sexually active women younger than 25 years.6 STI screening should be considered for men who report high-risk behaviors and in communities with a high burden of infection.6 Health care providers are expected to counsel individuals on safe sex practices, offer STI screening as indicated, and recommend the use of condoms to everyone. Despite these programs and recommendations, rates of STIs continue to increase—suggesting that these efforts are just not enough.
There are continued concerns regarding the availability of health care and the coverage of services, including annual STI screening and treatment. At-risk individuals without health insurance have diminished access to screening and treatment, leading to further increases in STI rates. However, EPT has the potential to reverse this trend by allowing health care providers to reach exposed individuals who would otherwise be unable to access health care services.
EXPEDITED PARTNER THERAPY
EPT is a health care practice that allows providers to give a prescription or medications to the heterosexual partners of patients diagnosed with chlamydia or gonorrhea without testing or examining the partner.7 Although EPT is not a substitute for a full sexual health evaluation, partners of infected individuals often cannot or do not seek treatment. Of note, EPT is not recommended for the management of STIs in men who have sex with men because of the lack of data demonstrating EPT’s effectiveness and the concern of missing STI and HIV coinfections in this population.7 EPT is endorsed by the CDC and the following professional health organizations: American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine, and American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Most importantly, EPT is a patient-centered, effective solution that is cost-effective and safe.7,8
WHERE EXPEDITED PARTNER THERAPY IS PERMISSIBLE
Several states enacted EPT legislation following the publication of the CDC’s EPT guidelines on August 16, 2006.7 Currently, EPT is permissible in 41 states and the District of Columbia (a legal status of EPT map is available at https://www.cdc.gov/std/ept/legal/default.htm). With the passing vote on House Bill 360 in February 2017, Georgia became the most recent state to permit the practice of EPT. EPT is “potentially allowable” in seven states and Puerto Rico. EPT is currently prohibited in South Carolina and Kentucky.
IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES
Although EPT is largely permissible in the United States, states struggle with its implementation. On the basis of each state’s wording and varying interpretation of the law, the implementation and delivery of EPT may be limited and contribute to the increasing STI rates.9 There are obstacles to fully realizing EPT’s potential at every level of health care (Figure A, available as a supplement to the online version of this article at http://www.ajph.org). Stigma affects STI screening and treatment and may limit both patients’ willingness to divulge concerns and providers’ willingness to initiate discussions regarding sexual health.10 Patients may not be aware of EPT and therefore cannot request it for their sexual partners or may not feel comfortable providing it to their partners. Partners may not fill the prescriptions (because of, e.g., high out-of-pocket cost, lack of insurance coverage) or take the medication after it is given to them.11 Cost continues to be a barrier, as many insurance companies currently do not cover EPT. Many health care providers may not be aware of the availability of EPT or how to provide it in the context of their current practice.12 Providers may also be resistant to prescribing EPT, as they may prefer to physically see or contact every patient.12 Barriers in the health care infrastructure also limit EPT use, because pharmacies and electronic medical records are often not equipped to implement and support the widespread practice of EPT.
THE FUTURE OF IMPLEMENTATION
In light of rising health care costs and the increasing burden of STIs, strengthening the implementation of effective STI treatment and prevention strategies is critical to tackle the STI epidemic. This is most important for high-risk individuals and communities with a high prevalence of STIs. Health care providers are at the front line of these efforts, including leading programs and policies to increase knowledge and usage of EPT. Additional research is warranted to improve the implementation of EPT, including research to further the understanding of the facilitators and barriers among health care providers and within complex health care systems. Training programs for physicians, nurses, and physician assistants could include education on the effectiveness and specific processes needed to provide EPT in their communities. Electronic medical records that remind providers and automate prescription of treatment of sexual partners concurrently with the index patient are promising advances to promote EPT uptake.
In addition to clinical practice, research is needed to understand what influences patient uptake of EPT, to understand effective ways to assist patients in educating their sexual partners, and to evaluate EPT implementation in high-risk populations, such as men who have sex with men and transgender individuals. In states where EPT is only potentially allowable or prohibited, clear communication of the efficacy of EPT on STI rates is needed to inform decision-making.
The United States is at a crossroads. STIs are rampant, especially among youths, and access to health care services continues to be limited for many. Although health care policies often lag behind clinical practice innovations, policies related to EPT are distinctly different. With 41 EPT permissible states in the United States, health care policies are well aligned to meet the needs of patients. EPT provides confidential and convenient treatment—two critical components of STI care. Therefore, it is time for state and local public health departments and health care providers to advance clinical processes and practice to fully realize the potential of EPT to address the worsening STI crisis.
REFERENCES
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2016. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Finer LB, Zolna MR. Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(9):843–852. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1506575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)—CDC fact sheet. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/pid/stdfact-pid.htm. Accessed August 14, 2017.
- 4.Hayes R, Watson-Jones D, Celum C, van de Wijgert J, Wasserheit J. Treatment of sexually transmitted infections for HIV prevention: end of the road or new beginning? AIDS. 2010;24(suppl 4):S15–S26. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000390704.35642.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Owusu-Edusei K, Jr, Chesson HW, Gift TL et al. The estimated direct medical cost of selected sexually transmitted infections in the United States, 2008. Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40(3):197–201. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318285c6d2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. STD & HIV screening recommendations. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/prevention/screeningreccs.htm. Accessed August 14, 2017.
- 7.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Expedited partner therapy in the management of sexually transmitted diseases. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/eptfinalreport2006.pdf. Accessed August 14, 2017.
- 8.Ferreira A, Young T, Mathews C, Zunza M, Low N. Strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(10):CD002843. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002843.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mmeje O, Wallett S, Kolenic G, Bell J. Impact of expedited partner therapy (EPT) implementation on chlamydia incidence in the USA. Sex Transm Infect. 2017 doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2016-052887. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ford JV, Ivankovich MB, Douglas JM, Jr et al. The need to promote sexual health in America: a new vision for public health action. Sex Transm Dis. 2017;44(10):579–585. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schillinger JA, Gorwitz R, Rietmeijer C, Golden MR. The expedited partner therapy continuum: a conceptual framework to guide programmatic efforts to increase partner treatment. Sex Transm Dis. 2016;43(2 supp 1):S63–S75. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rosenfeld EA, Marx J, Terry MA, Stall R, Pallatino C, Miller E. Healthcare providers’ perspectives on expedited partner therapy for chlamydia: a qualitative study. Sex Transm Infect. 2015;91(6):407–411. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]