Abstract
Toxoplasma gondii is an intracellular protozoan parasite, which is the cause of toxoplasmosis and can infect a wide variety of warm-blooded animals, including dogs and humans. The present study evaluated the seroprevalence of T. gondii infection in pet dogs in Ahvaz, southwest city of Iran, and investigated the related possible risk factors. A total of 180 serum samples were collected from dogs referred to Veterinary Hospital of Ahvaz. The samples were then tested by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The prevalence of T. gondii antibodies were 46.67%. Logistic regression and chi square tests were used for evaluating of risk factors. The positivity increased statistically significantly with dog’s gender (56% females and 39% males, P = 0.001), age (18% in <2 years old, 96% in ≥4 years old, P = 0.001) and place of living (47% outdoor dogs 38% house hold dogs, P = 0.025). However, no statistically significant association was found with dogs’ breed, deworming, food ingestion or contact with cats. Overall, the results showed a relatively high seroprevalence of T. gondii infection in dogs in southwest Iran (Ahvaz) and proved association of T. gondii prevalence rates with the dog’s age, gender and place of living.
Keywords: Toxoplasma gondii, Toxoplasmosis, Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Outdoor dogs, House hold dogs, Deworming
1. Introduction
Apicomplexan parasite Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) is a common infection that can infect a large number of warm-blooded animals [1]. The only definitive host known for T. gondii are Felids [2], which are the most important source of infection, therefore other animals as well as felids are considered as intermediate hosts. Generalized toxoplasmosis may occur in dogs under one year and is characterized by vomiting, fever, diarrhea, tonsillitis, icterus, and dyspnea [3]. In some cases, clinical toxoplasmosis in dogs might be misdiagnosed as canine distemper virus infection because it can infect and cause disease in immunosuppressed patients [4].
The source of Toxoplasma gondii infection is obtained by consummation of raw meat containing tissue cysts or through water and food contaminated with T. gondii oocysts [5]. Dogs can also play a role in the mechanical transmission of T. gondii oocyte to human through swallowing the infected feces of cats [6], [7]. Accordingly, the seroprevalence of T. gondii infection in dogs may reveal the level of parasite contamination in their environment [8]. Therefore, dogs are used as sentinel animals for T. gondii infection because of their close contact with humans [8], [9].
T. gondii infection in dogs is spread worldwide, with seroprevalence levels going from 20% to 91% in different states [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. In the present study, the serum samples were tested with indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. ELISA with adequate sensitivity and specificity offers valuable data about T. gondii infection and many other infectious diseases, which has been used in previous studies in Iran and other countries. The aim of the study was to detect T. gondii antibodies and analyze risk factors of infection in dogs from southwest of Iran.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Study samples
This study was performed in city of Ahvaz, southwestern of Iran, situated at an altitude of 12 m above sea level where the typical weather is warm and humid. A total number of 180 serum samples were randomly collected from owned dogs of various ages, breeds and either gender during 2015–2016. Dogs were brought to Veterinary Hospital of Shahid Chamran University, a facility which provides a full range of services from routine check-ups and vaccinations to emergency care and surgical precedures. The referred dogs were apparently in good health and were referred for vaccination purposes. From 180 samples, 78 (43%) were females and 102 (56%) were males. Age was determined by tooth replacement in dogs. The dogs were divided into three groups: less than 2 years old; 2–4 years old and 4 and over 4 years old. Blood samples were collected from cephalic vein and then centrifuged at 2500g (gravity) for 8 min. Subsequently serum was separated and stored at −20°C until ELISA examination. Information about dog’s gender, age, and breed were documented in an enquiry form.
2.2. Serological test
The ELISA test was done according to the producer’s instructions (ID Vet innovative diagnostics, rue Louis Pasteur, Grabels, France) and the optical density of the samples was measured at 450 nm [15]. For each sample, scotopic photopic (S/P) (%) was calculated:
| (1) |
Samples with S/P ≥ 70% were considered positive.
2.3. Statistical analysis
All the analyses were carried out using SPSS (Version 16.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). The association between genders, age, breed, food, history of deworming, living places, type of use and contact with cats were analyzed by kolmogorov–smirnov test, logistic regression and chi-square test. P-value of ≤0.05 indicated statistically significant differences. All Numbers and categories are mentioned in Table 1.
Table 1.
Associations between the variables and the presence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in dogs from southwest Iran.
| Category | Groups | Prevalence (%) | Odds Ratio | 95% CI for OD | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | <2 years | 18 (16/88) | – | – | |
| 2–4 years | 62 (38/61) | 4.33 | 2.86–6.56 | <0.001 | |
| ≥4 years | 97 (30/31) | – | – | ||
| Gender | Female | 56 (44/78) | 2.01 | 1.1–3.65 | <0.05 |
| Male | 39 (40/102) | – | – | – | |
| Breed* | Large | 46 (61/131) | – | – | |
| Small | 46 (23/49) | 1.02 | 0.53–1.96 | >0.05 | |
| Access to parks | Yes | 47 (79/167) | 1.44 | 0.45–4.57 | >0.05 |
| No | 38 (5/13) | – | – | – | |
| Contact with cats | Yes | 75% (9/12) | 3.72 | 0.97–14.23 | >0.05 |
| No | 44 (75/168) | – | – | ||
| Type of use | Pet | 43 (51/118) | – | – | – |
| guard | 53 (33/62) | 1.5 | 0.81–2.77 | >0.05 | |
| Food | Cooked | 45 (73/161) | 1.66 | 0.63–4.34 | >0.05 |
| Raw | 57 (11/9) | – | – | – | |
| Living place* | Indoors | 37 (18/48) | – | – | – |
| Outdoors | 50 (66/132) | 1.67 | 0.85–3.25 | >0.05 | |
| Deworming | Yes | 45 (77/169) | – | – | – |
| No | 63 (7/11) | 2.09 | 0.59–7.41 | >0.05 | |
Note 1:*Small dog breeds such as Chihuahua and terriers that are more suited for life in apartments and large dog breeds such as Labrador Retrievers and German Shepherds are more athletic breeds which need a larger household. Because some variables were not statically significant, those variables with higher insignificancy had been removed. The final result is shown in Table 2.
Note 2:*In living place category Indoor reflects the dogs that were kept inside the house and outdoor reflects dogs that were kept outside the house and in the yard.
3. Results
Among the 180 sera, 84 samples (46.67%, 95% CI: 39.37–53.97%) had antibodies against T. gondii and were positive. The seroprevalence of T. gondii infection in females was higher (56%) than males (39%) (P = 0.001). The seroprevalence of T. gondii infection varied in different age groups, ranging from 18% in <2 years old, to 96% in ≥4 years old, which increased with increasing of age (P = 0.001). Frequency of infection in dogs that had access to outdoors such as parks was higher (47%) compared to those did not access (38%). Overall the positivity increased statistically significantly with dogs’ gender, age and place of living. T. gondii in pet dogs (43%) had a lower seroprevalence than guard dogs (53%, P > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in seroprevalence between different breeds (P > 0.05). Infection rate in dogs fed with cocked meals was 1.66% (95% CI: 0.63–4.34) (P ≥ 0.05) compared to those fed with undercooked meals with no statistically significant difference. Dogs with history of deworming had a lower seroprevalence (45%) compared to dogs that had not been dewormed (63%). The results are summarized in Table 1, Table 2.
Table 2.
Odds ratio in multivariable logistic regression.
| Category | Groups | Odds Ratio | 95% CI for OD | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | <2 years | – | – | – |
| 2–4 years | 5.4 | 3.31–8.23 | 0.001* | |
| ≥4 years | – | – | – | |
| Gender | Female | 4.75 | 1.84–12.25 | – |
| Male | – | – | 0.001* | |
| Living place | Indoors | – | – | 0.025* |
| Outdoors | 3.34 | 1.17–9.59 | – | |
Note:*indicates significancy at 0.95%.
4. Discussion
In the present study, seroprevalence of T. gondii infection in pet dogs in city of Ahvaz, was 46.67%. Previous surveys reported varying seroprevalence of T. gondii infection in pet dogs in Iran: 48% in Northwest of Iran [16], 31% in Shiraz [17], 26% in Charmahale-bakhtiari, Esfahan, and Khuzestan province [18], and 22% in Tehran [4]. Seroprevalence of T. gondii infection in dogs was reported in several locations other than Iran. For example, seroprevalence of T. gondii infection in dogs in Brazil was 25–62% [19], [20] and in Czech Republic, 25–50% [21]. Furthermore, infection rate was 51% in Turkey [22], 33% in Sweden [23], 26% in Austria [24], and 12% in Spain [25].
Moreover, the results of present study revealed that seroprevalence rates were highly associated with gender, age and place of living. However, no statistically significant association was found with breed, deworming, ingestion of raw meat or contact with cats. The result showed that seroprevalence was higher in female dogs (56%) than males (39%), which is in accordance with findings of Hosseininejad et al. [4] and Shadfar et al. [26] in Iran. Higher risk of infection in females can be due to lower immune system in female dogs during and after pregnancies and lactation, yet other findings in Taiwan [27] and Iran [18], [28] reported no significant association of the infections with dog’s gender. Results of the present study were in line with findings from Brazil [11] and Iran [18], [28], [29], indicating that the chance of having T. gondii antibodies increases with age and has been ascribed to higher possibility for exposure to these protozoan parasites over time, rising the exposure in older dogs [18]. Findings of this study concerning dog’s living places were also consistent with previous findings suggesting that infection rate is remarkably higher in outdoor dogs compared to indoor dogs [4], [18]. One explanation is that, higher seroprevalence of T. gondii in dogs that are kept outdoors may be related to their accessibility to risk factors such as infected intermediate hosts, uncooked meat and also exposure to soil, water or food containing sporulated T. gondii oocysts [18], [30], [31]. Warm and humid climatic conditions in city of Ahvaz, might increase the risk of survival and spread of the oocysts, and therefore cause high T. gondii infection in this region. The present result concerning ingestion of raw meat, was in line with previous findings, suggesting that feeding dogs raw meat can be considered a risk factor for T. gondii infection but was not statistically significant [26], [32]. Finally, no statistically significant association was found between the infection rate and breed, deworming, or contact with cats, which is in line with some previous studies [9], [4], [8].
Consequently, the results of present study revealed that T. gondii infection may cause a major threat toward safety and public health in city of Ahvaz. However, more research is needed in order to find the causes of environmental infection with T. gondii and prevent it in dogs as well as humans living in this area. If individuals, especially those with immunodeficiency, are exposed to cats, dogs and soil, applying the hygienic principles is necessary to prevent them from being infected. Though, further research in different regions of Iran, is required to investigate the total epidemiological status of T. gondii infection in dog’s population.
5. Conclusions
T. gondii infection among pet dogs in Ahvaz city from southwest, Iran is very high (46.67%). The seroprevalence rates are associated with dog’s gender, age and place of living. Moreover T. gondii infection can be an important risk factor for public health in Ahvaz. Consequently, the findings of this study may benefit future studies and extend public awareness of the epidemiology of T. gondii infection in dogs in Iran. Early detection and control of toxoplasmosis in cats that live in the studied areas can reduce the incidence of the infection in humans and other intermediate hosts. Further studies are recommended to investigate the occurrence of T. gondii oocytes in dog’s feces in association with serology and molecular diagnosis.
Funding
This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests
We confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication.
Acknowledgement
We would like to express our appreciation to research council of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, for their financial support.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University.
References
- 1.Hill D., Dubey J.P. Toxoplasma gondii: transmission, diagnosis and prevention. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002;8:634–640. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2002.00485.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Webster J.P., Kaushik M., Bristow G.C., McConkey G.A. Toxoplasma gondii infection, from predation to schizophrenia: can animal behavior help us understand human behaviour? J Exp Biol. 2013;216:99–112. doi: 10.1242/jeb.074716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dubey J.P., Lindsay D.S., Lappin M.R. Toxoplasmosis and other intestinal coccidial infections in cats and dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2009;39:1009–1034. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2009.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hosseininejad M., Malmasi A., Hosseini F., Selk-Ghaffari M., Khorrami N., Mohebali M. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in dogs in Tehran, Iran. Iran J Parazitol. 2011;6:81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pereira K.S., Franco R.M., Leal D.A. Transmission of toxoplasmosis (Toxoplasma gondii) by foods. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2010;60:1–19. doi: 10.1016/S1043-4526(10)60001-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Frenkel J.K., Lindsay D.S., Parker B.B., Dobesh M. Dogs as possible mechanical carriers of Toxoplasma, and their fur as a source of infection of young children. Int J Infect Dis. 2003;7:292–293. doi: 10.1016/s1201-9712(03)90112-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lindsay D.S., Dubey J.P., Butler J.M., Blagburn B.L. Mechanical transmission of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts by dogs. Vet Parasitol. 1997;73:27–33. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(97)00048-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Alvarado-Esquivel C., Romero-Salas D., Cruz-Romero A., Garcia-Vazquez Z., Peniche-Cardena A., Ibarra-Priego N. High prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in dogs in Veracruz, Mexico. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10:191. doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0191-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Salb A.L., Barkema H.W., Elkin B.T., Thompson R.A., Whiteside D.P., Black S.R. Dogs as sources and sentinels of parasites in humans and wildlife, northern Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:60. doi: 10.3201/eid1401.071113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Langoni H., Modolo J.R., Pezerico S.B., Silva R.C., Castro A.P., Da Silva A.V. Serological profile of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in apparently healthy dogs of the city of Botucatu, Sao Paulo State. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2006;12:142–148. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Azevedo S.S., Batista C.S., Vasconcellos S.A., Aguiar D.M., Ragozo A.M., Rodrigues A.A. Seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in dogs from the state of Paraiba, Northeast region of Brazil. Res Vet Sci. 2005;79:51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2004.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dubey J.P., Rajapakse R.P., Wijesundera R.R., Sundar N., Velmurugan G.V., Kwok O.C. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in dogs from Sri Lanka and genetic characterization of the parasite isolates. Vet Parasitol. 2007;146:341–346. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cabral D.D., Silva D.A., Mineo J.R., Ferreira F.A., Duran F.P. Frequency of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in apparently healthy dogs of the city of Uberlandia-MO. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 1998;7:87–90. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu Q., Wang Z.D., Huang S.Y., Zhu X.Q. Diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and typing of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasite Vectors. 2015;8:292. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0902-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ahi M.R., Hajikolaei H., Rahim M., Seifi Abad Shapouri M.R. A serological survey on antibodies against Akabane virus in sheep in Southwest of Iran. Iran J Virol. 2015;9:20–25. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sharifdini M., Mohebali M., Keshavarz H., Hosseininejad M., Hajjaran H., Akhoundi B. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in domestic dogs in an area from northwest of Iran: a cross-sectional study using immunodominant surface antigen 1 (SAG1) J Parasite Dis. 2016;40:1278–1282. doi: 10.1007/s12639-015-0667-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shad-Del F., Ghaffari Sarvestani R., Salmani Milani M., Shad-Del F., Sarvestani R.G., Milani M.S. Sero-prevalence of Toxoplasma infection in human and dog population in Shiraz, Iran. J Appl Anim Res. 1993;3:83–89. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hosseininejad M., Hosseini F. Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii infection in dogs from west and central parts of Iran using two indirect ELISA tests and assessment of associate risk factors. Iran J Vet Res. 2011;12:46–51. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dominguis L.M., Machado R., Costa M.T., Cakvalho C., Costa A., Malhelros E.B. Canine Toxoplasmosis: a comparative evaluation of the detection of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies by the indirect immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) and the indirect immunofluorescence reaction (IIF) Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 1998;7:79–85. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Silva R.C., Souza L.C., Langoni H., Tanaka E.M., Lima V.Y., Silva A.V. Risk factors and presence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in dogs from the coast of Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Pesqui Vet Bras. 2010;30:161–166. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sedlak K., Bartova E. The prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii IgM and IgG antibodies in dogs and cats from the Czech Republic. Vet Med -PRAHA. 2006;51:555. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Oncel T., Handemir E., Kamburgil K., Yurtalan S. Determination of seropositivity for Toxoplasma gondii in stray dogs in Istanbul, Turkey. Rev Med Vet. 2007;158:223–228. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Uggla A., Mattson S., Juntti N. Prevalence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in cats, dogs and horses in Sweden. Acta Vet Scand. 1990;31(2):219–222. doi: 10.1186/BF03547564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wanha K., Edelhofer R., Gabler-Eduardo C., Prosl H. Prevalence of antibodies against Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in dogs and foxes in Austria. Vet Parasitol. 2005;128:189–193. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.11.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ortuno A., Castella J., Almeria S. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Neospora caninum in dogs from Spain. J Parasitol. 2002;88:1263–1266. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2002)088[1263:SOATNC]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shadfar S., Shabestari Asl A., Bafandeh Zende M., Gasemi B., Zamzam S.H. Evaluation of Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibodies in stray and household dogs by ELISA. Global Vet. 2012;9:117–122. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lin D.S. Seroprevalences to Toxoplasma gondii in privately-owned dogs in Taiwan. Prev Vet Med. 1998;35:21–27. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00090-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Malmasi A., Hosseininejad M., Haddadzadeh H., Badii A., Bahonar A. Serologic study of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in household dogs and dogs living in dairy and beef cattle farms in Tehran. Iran Parasitol Res. 2007;100:1143–1145. doi: 10.1007/s00436-006-0385-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yakhchali M., Javadi S., Morshedi A. Prevalence of antibodies to Neospora caninum in stray dogs of Urmia. Iran Parasitol Res. 2010;106:1455–1458. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-1824-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dubey J.P. Toxoplasma gondii cysts in placentas of experimentally infected sheep. Am J Vet Res. 1987;48:352–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dijkstra T.H., Barkema H.W., Eysker M., Hesselink J.W., Wouda W. Natural transmission routes of Neospora caninum between farm dogs and cattle. Vet Parasitol. 2002;105:99–104. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00010-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Svoboda M., Svobodova V. Effect of breed, sex, age, management and nutrition on the incidence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in dogs and cats. Acta Vet Brno. 2014;56:315–330. [Google Scholar]
