Enhanced electroscalpel incisional wound healing potential of honey in wistar rats

Abstract

Electrosurgery reduces surgical bleeding, and delayed wound healing. This study evaluated comparative incisional wound healing potential of honey in wound created with electroscalpel and cold scalpel. The study used twelve (12) adult male albino rats (130 ± 20 g), randomly grouped into Electro-cautery (n = 6) and Cold scalpel (n = 6). Each rat had three full thickness (6 mm diameter) skin wounds (a, b and c) created on its dorsum with either Electroscalpel (ES) or Cold blade scalpel (CS), and treated topically with Silver sulphadiazine (SSD, wound a), untreated (control, wound b) and Bee honey (H, wound c). The wounds were evaluated for gross (exudation, edema, hyperemia, contraction), histologic (granulation, angiogenesis, fibroplasia, epithelialization) and immunologic healing indices using standard techniques. Data were analyzed with Chi-square, Two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Duncan Multiple Range tests (DMRT) at α = 0.05. Wound hyperemia and edge edema were prominent in the ES group from day 4 to 6 (P = .000). Percentage wound contraction was higher in the CS than ES group from days 5 to 7 (P = .006) and in the CS treated with honey than ES treated with honey from days 7 to 14 (P = .000). Granulation tissue reduced in ES group treated with SSD than in honey and control wounds. Fibroelastic tissue increased in SSD and honey treated wounds of ES group, and higher in honey treated wounds of CS group (P < .05). Fibroplasia was sustained in honey and SSD treated wounds than control. Honey can be applied to electroscalpel surgical wound to facilitate rapid healing during surgical management of tumours having vascular network.

1. Introduction

Surgery is an active skill and equipment based specialty that uses, incisions, excision, manipulation, or other invasive procedures, with the aid of local, regional, or general anaesthesia for patient management [1]. The Cold blade scalpel (CBS) is one of the most commonly used instruments for surgical incisions and excisions [2]. Its’ use is however limited in tumor excision due to tumor tissues hyper-vascularity that make them prone to excessive bleeding and makes surgical hemostasis tedious, with concomitant obscurity of surgical field and risk of hypovolaemia [2]. This has made surgeons to prefer the use of electrosurgical devices, alongside with CBS. Conventional electrosurgery devices are cutting instruments that uses continuous-waveform radiofrequency energy delivered by means of an electrode to “incise” tissue by thermal ablation, which also produces simultaneous hemostasis [3], [4], [5], [6]. Electrosurgical cutting tools date back to the 1920s, and are currently used globally [3], [7], [8]. Although electrosurgical tools hemostatic capabilities aid reduction of surgical bleeding, the device is associated with delayed wound healing due to heat associated tissue damage which results in prolonged debridement process [8], [9], [10]. Despite this apparent disadvantage, their use remains valuable, especially in poor resource settings, necessitating a search for wound healing agents, which could facilitate healing of electro-scalpel wounds.

A wound is a disruption of tissues’ normal anatomic structure and functions with or without tissue loss [11]. Wound healing is a biologic process following injury geared at restoration of lost tissues and tissue integrity [12], [13], [14]. It is characterized by a dynamics of simultaneous, interwoven phases that involve a complex arrays of chemical mediators and the immune cells, that ultimately result in repair processes characterized by angiogenesis, fibroplasia and remodeling [11]. Wound healing is influenced by host factors [12], wound characteristics [15], and applied healing agents [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. Wound healing effects of various substances including potash-table salt [13], Moringa oliefera [14], aqueous pineapple juice [18], honey [14], [15], to mention a few; have been investigated on animal model wounds created with cold scalpel. Honey, however, has been reported to have a potential healing effect on chemical burn wounds [17]. We hereby hypothesize that honey will positively influence rapid healing of electro-scalpel wound.

Honey is an ancient remedy for the treatment of wounds, particularly where conventional modern therapeutic agents has failed. Honey outstanding potentials in accelerating varying wound types have been described in both clinical and experimental studies [19], [20], [21]. Its healing properties and mechanism of action have also been elucidated in our previous studies [17], [22]. Despite, however, the robust information on honey wound healing potentials; there is a dearth of information on honey application to enhance healing of electro-scalpel created wounds. This study therefore evaluated honey potentials in healing of electro-scalpel wounds of adult Wister albino rat.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Ethical approval

Approval of the Institutional Animal Use and Care Committee was sought before commencement of the study and all applicable guidelines (international, national, and/or institutional) were followed.

2.2. Honey

Natural, unprocessed, un-boiled multi-flora honey obtained from a bee hive farm in Ibadan, Nigeria was studied.

2.3. Experimental animals and research design

Twelve (12) adult male albino rats weighing 130 ± 20 g were used for the study. The rats were sourced from a local breeding unit, housed at the Experimental Animal Housing Unit of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ibadan, in well aerated cages and exposed to a 12 h light/dark cycle, 21 ± 0.5 °C temperature and 23–30% relative humidity. The rats were provided with rat diet and clean water ad libitum. The rats were randomized into two groups; Electroscalpel (ES) group, (n = 6) and Cold scalpel (CS) group, (n = 6).

2.4. Anaesthesia and wound site preparation

Each rat was anaesthetized with an intramuscular injection of 5% Ketamine (Rottex medica, Germany) (35.0 mg/kg) and 2% Xylazine (VMD, Belgium) (5.0 mg/kg) via the quadriceps group of muscles as earlier described [23]. Following anaesthesia, the skin of dorsum (thoraco-lumber region) of each rat was prepared for aseptic surgery by shaving and sterilization with chlorhexidine and alcohol.

Each rats in the ES group had 3 full thickness incisional skin wounds created on the dorsum (thoraco-lumber region) with an electroscalpel device (Surtron, Italy), set at 30watts as previously described [24]. Also, each rats in the CS group, had 3 full thickness incisional skin wounds created on the dorsum (thoraco-lumber region) with a size 15 scalpel blade fixed on a size 3 Bird Parker blade holder.

2.5. Treatment application

The three wounds on each rat were identified cranio-caudally as: Silver sulphadiazide (SSD) treatment, control (C) (untreated), and honey (H) treatment. The treatment preparations were topically applied to the wounds once daily for 14 days.

2.6. Evaluation of gross wound healing indices

Wounds were daily evaluated for healing indices as previously described [21]. Wound edge edema and hyperemia were graded as severe, mild or absent. Granulation tissue was graded as high, low or absent. The wound size (mm) was determined with a digital venial caliper (Globetronics & Co. ltd, Germany), and the percentage wound contraction was calculated as:

$$\frac{\text{Initial wound size}-\text{Specific day wound size}\times 100}{\text{Initial wound size}}$$

2.7. Evaluation of histologic wound healing indices

Following euthanasia with Ketamine (70 mg/kg) and xylazine (15 mg/kg) at days 5, 7 and 14 as described previously [17], wound tissues consisting of the entire wound region excised in-depth with liberal margins of the surrounding skin including underlying connective tissues above the external fascia of the dorsal muscles, were obtained from the animals per group, at days 5, 7 and 14, and stored in (10%) formalin. The tissues were processed and stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin [25]. Granulation tissue, vascularization, fibro elastic tissue and epithelialization response were evaluated with a semi-quantitative four-point scale scoring system [26], by two histopathologists who worked independently.

Sections were equally stained with Giemsa for quantification of inflammatory cells and fibroblast responses during the healing episodes. Photomicrographs of lesions were taken appropriately from each slide with the aid of a computer enabled digital camera device (MU900, Amscope, England) attached to a microscope (CX21, Olympus, China). The cells were quantified on the open source Fiji software (Image J, Japan).

2.8. Data analysis

The data generated were presented in frequencies, percentages, ‘Mean ± standard deviation’ and analyzed with Chi square, two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at 5% confident limit.

3. Results

3.1. Wound exudation

Wounds of rats in the ES and CS groups were wet between days 1 and 4. The level of wound wetness was more in rats in the ES group (P = .029) from day 5 to 9 with the degree of wetness low in the honey treated wound (SSD > control > H), but less in rats in the CS group between day 2 and 4 with lower degree of wetness observed in honey treated wounds compared to Silver sulphadiazide and untreated wounds (SSD > control > H) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Evaluation of wound exudation, edge edema and hyperemia in electro-scalpel and cold scalpel induced wounds in rats.

Day	Electroscalpel									Cold Scalpel
	SILVER SULPHADIAZINE			Control			Honey			SILVER SULPHADIAZINE			Control			Honey
	WE	WEE	WH	WE	WEE	WH	WE	WEE	WH	WE	WEE	WH	WE	WEE	WH	WE	WEE	WH
1	0	6(100%)	6(100%)	0	6(100%)	6(100%)	0	6(100%)	6(100%)	6(100%)	6(100%)	6(100%)	6(100%)	6(100%)	6(100%)	6(100%)	6(100%)	6(100%)
2	0	6(100%)	6(100%)	0	6(100%)	6(100%)	0	6(100%)	6(100%)	3(50%)	5(83%)	5(66%)	4(66%)	4(66%)	6(100%)	3(50%)	4(66%)	6(100%)
3	0	5(83%)	6(100%)	0	5(83%)	6(100%)	0	2(33%)	6(100%)	3(50%)	3(50%)	5(83%)	4(66%)	3(50%)	5(83%)	3(50%)	3(50%)	4(66%)
4	0	3(50%	3(50%)	0	5(83%)	3(50%)	0	2(33%)	3(50%)	2(33%)	2(33%)	2(33%)	2(33%)	3(50%)	2(33%)	2(33%)	2(33%)	1(16%)
5	0	3(16%)	1(16%)	1(16%)	4(66%)	1(16%)	0	2(33%)	1(16%)	0	0	0	0	0	1(16%)	0	0	0
6	1(16)*	3(50%)	0	0	4(66%)	0	0	2(33%)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
7	1(16)*	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1(16%)	0	0	0	0	0
8	1(16)*	0	0	1(16%)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
9	1(16)*	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
10>	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

WE – wound exudation; WEE – wound edge edema; WH – wound hyperemia.

3.2. Wound edge edema

Wound edge edema was severe in all the rats’ wounds in the ES and SC induced wounds from day 1 to 2. It was severe in the ES group between day 4 and 6 (P = .000) (honey < silver<control), but mild in the CS group from day 2 to 4 (p < .05).

3.3. Wound surface hyperemia

The wound surface was hyperemic in all the wounds on day 1–2, but severe on day 4 and 5 in the ES group with more redness observed in SSD treated wounds (SSD ≥ honey ≥ control). The hyperemia reduced from day 3 to 5 in the CS group (honey > SSD ≥ control).

3.4. Wound contraction

Percentage wound contraction was gradual between ES and CS wounds from day 1 to 14 (Fig. 1A–D) but better improvement was observed in CS wounds (Fig. 1D). The Percentage wound contraction was increased in the CS than ES wounds at days 5–7 (P = .006) and days 7–14 (P = .000) (Table 2).

Fig. 1.

Gross examination of wounds: A – wounds created with electroscalpel at day 5 still having exudation and thick granulation tissue. B – Wounds created with cold scalpel at days 5 already healing progress and contraction of wound surface. C – Wounds created with electroscalpel at day 14 showing wound surface contraction. D – Wounds created with cold scalpel at days 14 already contracted. (S = silver sulphadiazine, C = control, H = honey).

Table 2.

Mean daily percentage wound contraction in electroscalpel and cold scalpel induced wounds in rats.

Day	Electro-scalpel			Cold Scalpel
	SSD	Control	Honey	SSD	Control	Honey
1.	6.75 ± 0.86a	4.99 ± 2.64a	7.26 ± 1.48a	16.87 ± 7.39a	7.60 ± 3.21a	9.76 ± 3.95a
2.	10.21 ± 4.31a	7.91 ± 2.24a	9.01 ± 4.72a	31.56 ± 4.51b	19.82 ± 12.35b	16.27 ± 4.69a
3.	11.26 ± 3.89a	11.40 ± 6.10a	11.32 ± 4.84a	7.6 ± 12.788c	27.87 ± 11.59b	20.53 ± 5.80b
4.	16.12 ± 9.19a	12.90 ± 3.62a	13.49 ± 5.52a	47.30 ± 16.05d	32.74 ± 6.99b	33.18 ± 6.17b
5.	21.82 ± 11.35b	18.91 ± 10.53a	19.31 ± 6.39b	66.98 ± 3.32d	47.44 ± 11.29c	38.10 ± 3.98b
6.	24.60 ± 17.53b	21.48 ± 16.45b	21.55 ± 7.89b	78.22 ± 14.58d	51.57 ± 20.22c	47.55 ± 11.09c
7.	19.19 ± 8.46b	16.58 ± 4.95a	19.09 ± 1.14b	88.81 ± 9.67d	60.69 ± 23.90c	47.55 ± 11.09c
8.	20.76 ± 7.31b	19.28 ± 2.96b	20.74 ± 4.02b	97.22 ± 5.56d	64.56 ± 18.52c	59.46 ± 16.42c
9.	24.10 ± 5.41b	20.75 ± 5.84b	22.31 ± 4.19b	97.22 ± 5.56d	68.31 ± 16.53c	69.55 ± 17.73c
10.	25.67 ± 8.29b	23.70 ± 4.72b	26.28 ± 2.77b	99.3 ± 8.30d	69.70 ± 24.92c	75.48 ± 15.82c
11.	26.79 ± 2.52b	23.61 ± 1.96b	31.77 ± 11.65b	101 ± 12.0d	80.43 ± 27.68d	87.94 ± 17.06d
12.	33.48 ± 3.15b	26.74 ± 6.39b	39.71 ± 14.56c	98 ± 12.0d	80.00 ± 18.1d	90 ± 14.14d
13.	40.02 ± 3.57c	29.86 ± 10.80b	39.71 ± 14.56c	110 ± 7.70d	83.34 ± 23.57d	96.67 ± 4.72d
14.	43.75 ± 8.84c	29.86 ± 10.80b	44.71 ± 21.63c	100 ± 9.00d	103 ± 12.00d	100 ± 8.00d

Values with different superscript are significant across rows and columns at α = 0.05.

SSS = Silver sulphadiazine.

3.5. Granulation tissue

Wound granulation tissues on day 7 was high in the untreated wounds as compared to SSD and honey treatment in the ES rats (SSD < honey ≥ control) (Fig. 2A–C). It was less in SSD (Fig. 3A) and honey treated wounds than control (Fig. 3B and C) of the CS induced wounds (P < .05), thus indicating the remarkable progress of healing (Table 3).

Fig. 2.

Photomicrographs of electroscalpel wounds at day 7: A – (SSD) shows moderate granulation tissue (blue arrow). B – (Control) show granulation tissue (blue arrow). C (Honey) shows presence of marked cellular infiltrates (black arrow) and granulation tissue (blue arrow). HE ×400.

Fig. 3.

Photomicrographs of coldscapel wound at day 7: A – (SSD) shows severe granulation (blue arrow), and moderate angiogenesis (white arrow). B (Control) shows moderate granulation (blue arrow), and moderate angiogenesis (white arrow). C (Honey) shows epithelialization (green arrow), moderate granulation (blue arrow), mild angiogenesis (thin arrow) and moderate fibrosis. HE ×400.

Table 3.

Wound histologic indices and inflammatory cell counts of electroscalpel and cold scalpel induced wounds in rats at day 5, 7 and 14.

Parameters	Electroscalpel			Cold scalpel
	SSD	CONTROL	HONEY	SSD	CONTROL	HONEY
Day 5
Granulation tissue	3.00 ± 0.10a	3.00 ± 0.20a	3.00 ± 0.13a	3.00 ± 0.20a	3.00 ± 0.30a	2.00 ± 0.10a
Vascularization	2.00 ± 0.06a	2.00 ± 0.10a	2.00 ± 0.11a	2.00 ± 0.06a	2.00 ± 0.10a	1.00 ± 0.07a
Fibro-elastic tissue	0.00 ± 0.00a	0.00 ± 0.00a	0.00 ± 0.00a	0.00 ± 0.00a	0.00 ± 0.00a	0.00 ± 0.00a
Epithelialization	0.00 ± 0.00a	0.00 ± 0.00a	1.00 ± 0.01a	0.00 ± 0.00a	0.00 ± 0.00a	2.00 ± 0.10a
Macrophages	20 ± 8.49a	43.0 ± 11.31b	27.50 ± 2.12a	7.5 ± 3.54a	15.0 ± 21.21a	29.5 ± 4.95b
Neutrophils	16.5 ± 0.71a	28.5 ± 0.71b	20.50 ± 3.54a	2.5 ± 3.54a	8.5 ± 12.02a	19.0 ± 24.0a
Lymphocytes	15.0 ± 1.41a	21.0 ± 16.97a	32.00 ± 4.24b	10.5 ± 2.12a	20.0 ± 28.3a	31.0 ± 7.1a
Mast cells	3.0 ± 4.24a	0.0 ± 0.00b	6.00 ± 5.66c	10.5 ± 6.4c	0.00 ± 0.00b	0.0 ± 0.00b
Fibroblast	200 ± 28.5a	78.0 ± 14.14b	200 ± 15.80a	10.0 ± 4.2c	66.0 ± 77.8b	200.0 ± 25.0a
Day 7
Granulation tissue	1.00 ± 0.03a	3.00 ± 0.30b	3.00 ± 0.20b	3.00 ± 0.10b	2.00 ± 0.10a	1.00 ± 0.04a
Vascularization	1.00 ± 0.10a	2.00 ± 0.10a	1.00 ± 0.10a	2.00 ± 0.08a	1.00 ± 0.03a	1.00 ± 0.08a
Fibro-elastic tissue	2.00 ± 0.10a	0.00 ± 0.00b	0.00 ± 0.00b	0.00 ± 0.00b	0.00 ± 0.00b	1.00 ± 0.03a
Epithelialization	1.00 ± 0.05a	0.00 ± 0.00a	3.00 ± 0.20b	1.00 ± 0.06a	2.00 ± 0.10b	2.00 ± 0.20b
Macrophages	9.50 ± 4.94a	18.0 ± 4.24b	14.50 ± 14.85a	27.5 ± 7.8b	23.3 ± 9.89b	16.5 ± 9.19a
Neutrophils	7.50 ± 7.77a	7.0 ± 5.65a	2.50 ± 3.53a	11.5 ± 7.78a	9.5 ± 3.54a	6.5 ± 9.19a
Lymphocytes	20.0 ± 25.5a	15.0 ± 2.82a	11.00 ± 11.31a	19.5 ± 0.71a	21.0 ± 11.3a	23.5 ± 23.3b
Mast cells	7.00 ± 4.24a	0.0 ± 0.00b	0.00 ± 0.00b	0.00 ± 0.00b	0.00 ± 0.00b	0.00 ± 0.00b
Fibroblast	30.5 ± 20.5a	37.0 ± 19.8a	116.5 ± 118.1b	146.5 ± 76b	156.0 ± 0.0b	62.2 ± 21.0b
Day 14
Granulation tissue	0.00 ± 0.00a	2.00 ± 0.20b	1.00 ± 0.01a	0.00 ± 0.00a	0.00 ± 0.00a	0.00 ± 0.00a
Vascularization	1.00 ± 0.10a	2.00 ± 0.08b	1.00 ± 0.10a	0.00 ± 0.00a	0.00 ± 0.00a	0.00 ± 0.00a
Fibro-elastic tissue	2.00 ± 0.20a	0.00 ± 0.00b	2.00 ± 0.10a	2.00 ± 0.10a	2.00 ± 0.10a	3.00 ± 0.20a
Epithelialization	2.00 ± 0.10a	1.00 ± 0.05b	3.00 ± 0.20a	3.00 ± 0.10a	3.00 ± 0.20a	3.00 ± 0.10a
Macrophages	21.0 ± 18.4a	18.0 ± 2.83a	18.00 ± 2.83a	36.5 ± 14.9b	24.5 ± 4.95a	13.0 ± 11.3a
Neutrophils	10.0 ± 14.1a	27.0 ± 24.04b	2.00 ± 2.83a	8.0 ± 5.7a	10.5 ± 2.12a	3.5 ± 4.95a
Lymphocytes	29.0 ± 12.7a	21.0 ± 1.31a	37.50 ± 21.9b	35.5 ± 6.4b	26.0 ± 4.24a	16.5 ± 2.1a
Mast cells	3.50 ± 5.0a	0.0 ± 0.00a	0.00 ± 0.00a	5.5 ± 7.8a	2.5 ± 3.54a	0.5 ± 0.71a
Fibroblast	113.5 ± 60a	114.5 ± 108.2a	147.50 ± 74.3a	200.0 ± 0.0b	129.5 ± 99.7a	94. ± 11.3a

Values with different superscript are significant across rows at α = 0.05.

SSS = Silver sulphadiazine.

3.6. Epithelialization

Honey treated wounds of ES and SC showed a significantly higher (P < .05) level of epitheliazation on day 5, 7 (honey > SSD > control). All wounds showed complete epithelialization on day 14 (Fig. 4A–C).

Fig. 4.

Photomicrographs of electroscalpel wounds at day 14: A (SSD) shows granulation (asterick), moderate contraction and epithelialization (blue arrow). B (Control) shows abundant granulation tissue (asterick) with loose connective tissue and no contraction. C (Honey) shows wound contraction (white arrow), moderate granulation (asterick), angiogenesis and epithelialization (blue arrow) HE ×400.

3.7. Vascularization

Blood vessels regressed faster in the wounds treated with SSD and honey than control in the ES group with the level of vascularization significantly higher (P < .05) in control wounds on days 7 and 14. Blood vessels also regressed faster on days 5 and 7 in the wounds treated with honey than in control and SSD with the trend being honey < control < SSD. Blood vessels had regressed in all the wounds by day 14 (Fig. 5A–C).

Fig. 5.

Photomicrographs of coldscapel wound at day 14: A (SSD) shows complete epithelialization (blue arrow) and wound contraction. B (Control) shows granulation tissues (asterick), and moderate angiogenesis. C (Honey) shows complete epithelialization (blue arrow) and loose connective tissue. HE ×400.

3.8. Fibroelastic tissue

No fibroelastic tissue was seen in ES and CS groups wounds on day 5, but significantly higher P < .05) in wounds treated with SSD and honey in ES and CS groups on day 7 and 14 (honey > SSD > control).

3.9. Inflammatory cells and fibroblast response

Inflammatory cells were high in the Honey and SSD treated wounds as compared to the control of the ES group at day 5 (Table 3). Fibroplasia was more and sustained in the Honey and SSD treated groups more than in the control at days 7 and 14. Inflammatory cellular infiltrate (macrophages, neutrophils and lymphocytes) was markedly high in the Honey treated group as compared to the SSD and control of CS group on day 5.

4. Discussion

The result of this study shows honey efficacy in enhancing healing in electroscalpel induced wound of wister rats. Silver sulphadiazine was used as a positive control, for its burn wound healing effects in previous studies [27], [28]. The wound healing indices adopted for this study are conventional assessment parameters in wound healing studies [22], [26], [29].

The rate of inflammatory cellular infiltrate (neutrophils, macrophages and lymphocytes) were markedly high in the honey and SSD treatments of the electroscalpel group, than control at day 5 (p < .05). Honey immunostimulatory potentials must have influenced the observed immune cellular infiltration to tissues for autolytic debridement and growth of cell for wound repairs [30]. This honey immune-stimulatory activity has been attributed to substances present in honey, such as: major royal jelly proteins-1, arabinogalactan and some phytochemicals [30], [31]. The reduction in edema and surface exudation especially in honey treated group from day 3 was as a result of honey’s physical and anti-inflammatory properties which reduces edema and the amount of wound exudation by down-regulating the inflammatory process [30]. Wound edge edema and hyperemia are local signs of acute inflammation from day 0 to 3 of injury in clean wounds, and could be signs of wound infection and evidence of debridement challenges when it progresses beyond day 3 of injury [22]. Honey also drives edema by mobilizing fluid from the surrounding tissue [32], [33], [34]. The reduction in edema and surface hyperemia seen in wounds treated with SSD is in line with the use of Silver sulphadiazine as a drug of choice in treating burn wounds due to its wide spectrum of bactericidal activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms [28]. This observation coupled with the exudations observed between days 5 and 9 may provide a rationale for the prolonged wound surface hyperemia seen in the electroscalpel group beyond day 3. The marked reduction in wound hyperemia observed in honey treated wounds was due to honey associated mechanisms in inflammation reduction by inhibition of nitric acid production by macrophages [35], inhibition of complement factors [20], decrease of thermal injury induced oxidative stress due to apalbumina-1 [36], an anti-inflammatory factor.

Wound contraction was faster in cold blade scalpel than in the electroscalpel group due to thermal injury, compromised tissue blood circulation, and decreased immune potentials of the thermal damaged tissues [37], resulting in prolongation of debridement and repair phases [38]. Wounds treated with honey, however, showed improved contraction and faster epithelialization in both the CBS and ES groups than sulphadiazine and control. Honey’s accelerated wound healing properties have been well reported and its effects linked with its antibacterial and immunostimulatory effects on fibroblasts, epithelial cells growth, and development of new capillaries in damaged tissues [28], [39], [40], [41], [42].

The observed faster blood vessel regression on days 7 and 14, in SSD and honey treated wounds compared with control shows honey’s ability to facilitates wound healing process and conversion of fleshy and well vascular collagen type 11 granulation tissues to the less vascular collagen type 1 [24], [43]. This reflected in the expanse of fibroelastic tissue observed in honey and SSD treated wounds on day 14 across the ES and CBS groups. Fibroblasts play an important role in producing the collagen necessary to restore the tensile strength of wounded skin [44]. Tumor vessels are more permeable than normal vessels; their immature nature means they are poorly invested with smooth muscle cells and may have a discontinuous endothelial cell lining with an abnormal basement membrane [45], [46]. Increased vessel permeability may result in aberrant osmotic forces, accumulation of vascular contents and elevated interstitial fluid pressure leading to excessive bleeding.

5. Conclusions

Honey enhanced the healing process in electroscalpel induced wound. This prospect can facilitate a rapid healing especially in surgical management of tumours with marked vascular network. Thus, knowledge of use of honey in management of electroscalpel induced will allow full exploration of electro-surgery.

Funding statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.