Abstract
Background
Female patients present with unique physiological and behavioral characteristics compared to male patients. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the injury patterns, injury characteristics, and mortality of male and female patients hospitalized for treatment of motorcycle accident-related trauma in a level I trauma center.
Methods
Retrospective analysis of motorcycle-related injuries from the Trauma Registry System was performed to identify and compare 4028 male and 2919 female patients hospitalized for treatment between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013.
Results
The female patients were younger, less often drunken, more often wore helmets, were transported by emergency medical services, and arrived at the emergency department between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. compared to male patients. Analysis of Abbreviated Injury Scale scores revealed that female patients sustained significantly higher rates of injuries to the extremities, but lower rates of injuries to the head/neck, face, and thorax than male patients did. Female patients had a significant lower Injury Severity Score (ISS) and adjusted odds ratio of in-hospital mortality (AOR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.83–0.86) after adjustment by ISS. However, the logistic regression analysis of propensity score-matched patients with adjusted confounders including helmet-wearing status and alcohol intoxication revealed that the gender did not significantly influence mortality (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.47–1.43; p = 0.475), implying the an associated risky behaviors may attribute to the difference of odds of mortality between the male and female patients. In addition, a significantly fewer female patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and female patients had a significantly shorter hospital and ICU length of stay.
Conclusion
Female motorcycle riders have different injury characteristics, lower ISS and in-hospital mortality, and present with a bodily injury pattern that differs from that of male motorcycle riders.
Level of evidence
Epidemiologic study, level III.
Keywords: Female, Male, Injury severity, Motorcycle, Trauma
At a glance commentary
Scientific background on the subject
Although strong evidence indicates that the risk of road traffic injury varies by sex, there remains a lack of consensus over the detailed characteristics of injury pattern and injury severity between women and men in motorcycle traffic accidents.
What this study adds to the field
This study revealed that the female motorcycle riders had a lower mortality than male motorcycle riders. However, analysis of propensity score-matched patients with adjusted confounders including helmet-wearing status and alcohol intoxication revealed that the associated risky behaviors, but not the gender, may attribute to the difference of odds of mortality.
Motorcycle use is popular in many cities as a less expensive, easier, and more fuel-efficient means of transportation. Road traffic accidents involving motorcycle riders often result in severe morbidity and mortality. Motorcyclists make up 13% and 16% of all annual traffic-related fatalities and inpatient injuries, respectively, despite being a small fraction of the travel [1]. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reported that at the national level, motorcyclists were approximately 30 times more likely to die in a motor vehicle crash than a motor vehicle occupant in 2011 [2]. In addition, motorcycle riders were 8 times more likely to be injured per vehicle mile [3], and 58 times more likely to be killed on a per-trip basis [4]. Women have been reported to have a significantly higher risk of slight injury than men when travelling by bus, bicycle, and car, but no differences are observed between the sexes as pedestrians, nor as motorcycle or moped drivers [5]. Analysis using a travel-based measure of exposure in a U.S. state with a population with roughly equal numbers of men and women revealed that the women accounted for 39% of traffic-related inpatient injuries and 32% of traffic-related fatalities [1]. The higher risk of non-fatal injury among female drivers has also been reported in studies that used driving distance as a measure of exposure [6], [7]. In contrast, some authors reported the male:female ratio in motorcycle injuries was as high as 4.8:1 [8]. However, although strong evidence indicates that the risk of road traffic injury varies by sex [4], [5], [9], there remains a lack of consensus over the detailed characteristics of injury pattern, and whether injury is higher among women or men in motorcycle traffic accidents.
Identifying high-risk injury patterns and gaining a greater understanding major trauma epidemiology in different sexes is vital to the integration of trauma knowledge in the trauma system to maximize the provision of services and the quality of care delivered [10], [11]. Moreover, considering that nearly all motorcycles are forbidden on highways in Asian cities, and that most traffic accidents occur in relatively crowded streets in these cities at relatively low speeds, we hypothesize that the discrepancy between the sexes might differ from those of previous Western studies. This study investigated the injury pattern, mechanisms, severity, and mortality of male and female patients treated for injuries sustained in motorcycle accidents in a level I trauma center in Taiwan using data from a population-based trauma registry.
Methods
Ethics statement
This study was approved by the hospital institutional review board (IRB) with approval number 103-3020B before its initiation. An informed consent was waived according to the regulation of IRB.
Study design
This retrospective study reviewed all of the data added to the Trauma Registry System of a 2400-bed Level I regional trauma center, which provides care to trauma patients primarily from South Taiwan. Cases of hospitalization for trauma sustained in motorcycle accidents from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013 were selected. Among the 6947 registered patients entered in the database, 4028 (58.0%) were male and 2919 (42.0%) were female. Detailed patient information was retrieved from the Trauma Registry System of our institution, which included patient age, admission vital signs, injury mechanism, and helmet use. The method of transportation to the emergency department was also examined, and included emergency medical services (EMS), private vehicle, or transfer by ambulance from another hospital. Other data collected included the first Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in the emergency department, details of the procedures performed at the emergency department (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intubation, chest tube insertion, and blood transfusion), an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of each body region, Injury Severity Score (ISS), New Injury Severity Score (NISS), Trauma-Injury Severity Score (TRISS), hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, in-hospital mortality, and associated complications. Adjusted odd ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for mortality according to age and stratified ISS were calculated. In our study, the primary outcomes were injury severity as measured by different scoring system (GCS, AIS, ISS, NISS, and TRISS) and in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were the associated complications, and hospital and ICU LOS. The data collected were analyzed using SPSS v. 20 statistical software (IBM, Armonk, NY) for Pearson's chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact tests, or the independent Student's t-tests, as applicable. A 1:1 matched study group was created by the Greedy method using NCSS software (NCSS 10; NCSS Statistical software, Kaysville, Utah). After adjusting for confounding factors such as status of helmet-wearing and alcohol intoxication, a conditional logistic regression was used for evaluating the effect of gender on mortality. All results are presented as the mean ± standard error. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Patient characteristics
As shown in Table 1, the mean patient age was 40.4 ± 19.3 and 44.8 ± 18.5 years, respectively, in the male and female patient groups. Among women, fewer patients were aged between 10 and 19, 20–29, 30–39, and 80–89 years, but a greater number of patients were aged between 50–59 and 60–69 years. Most of the injured patients were drivers, with significant more male drivers and female pillions. There were significantly more women transported to the hospital by EMS than men (p < 0.001). In contrast, significantly more men than women were transferred by ambulance from other hospitals (p < 0.001). Helmet-wearing status was recorded as 97.6% and 98.3% for men and women, respectively; however, at the time of injury, significantly more female patients were wearing helmets than male patients (88.9% vs. 83.9%, p < 0.001). More female patients arrived at the emergency department between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. (p < 0.001), while more male patients arrived between 5 p.m. and 11 p.m. and 11 p.m.–7 a.m. (p < 0.001). A positive blood alcohol content (BAC) was more frequent among men than women (14.0% vs. 2.4%, respectively; p < 0.001).
Table 1.
Demographics of hospitalized trauma male and female motorcycle riders.
| Variables | Male N = 4028 | Female N = 2919 | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 40.4 ± 19.3 | 44.8 ± 18.5 | 0.115 |
| 0-9 | 34(0.8) | 34(1.2) | 0.180 |
| 10-19 | 518(12.9) | 287(9.8) | <0.001 |
| 20-29 | 989(24.6) | 513(17.6) | <0.001 |
| 30-39 | 590(14.6) | 288(9.9) | <0.001 |
| 40-49 | 570(14.2) | 377(12.9) | 0.138 |
| 50-59 | 521(12.9) | 684(23.4) | <0.001 |
| 60-69 | 421(10.5) | 526(18.0) | <0.001 |
| 70-79 | 292(7.2) | 195(6.7) | 0.359 |
| 80-89 | 86(2.1) | 15(0.5) | <0.001 |
| ≧90 | 7(0.2) | 0(0.0) | 0.024 |
| Seat | <0.001 | ||
| Driver | 3836(95.2) | 2608(89.3) | |
| Pillions | 192(4.8) | 311(10.7) | |
| Transpose, n(%) | |||
| EMS | 1910(47.4) | 1552(53.2) | <0.001 |
| Private vehicle | 674(16.7) | 489(16.8) | 0.983 |
| Transferred | 1444(35.8) | 878(30.1) | <0.001 |
| Helmet, n(%) | |||
| Yes | 3379(83.9) | 2595(88.9) | <0.001 |
| No | 551(13.7) | 275(9.4) | <0.001 |
| Unspecific | 98(2.4) | 49(1.7) | 0.031 |
| Time, n(%) | |||
| 7:00–17:00 | 2022(50.2) | 1799(61.6) | <0.001 |
| 17:00–23:00 | 1261(31.3) | 733(25.1) | <0.001 |
| 23:00–7:00 | 742(18.4) | 384(13.2) | <0.001 |
| Unspecific | 3(0.1) | 3(0.1) | – |
| Alcohol>50, n(%) | 564(14.0) | 69(2.4) | <0.001 |
| GCS | 14.0 ± 2.6 | 14.4 ± 2.1 | <0.001 |
| ≤8 | 282(7.0) | 124(4.2) | <0.001 |
| 9-12 | 208(5.2) | 93(3.2) | <0.001 |
| ≥13 | 3538(87.8) | 2702(92.6) | <0.001 |
| AIS,n(%) | |||
| Head/Neck | 1419(35.2) | 869(29.8) | <0.001 |
| Face | 1094(27.2) | 642(22.0) | <0.001 |
| Thorax | 723(17.9) | 366(12.5) | <0.001 |
| Abdomen | 301(7.5) | 197(6.7) | 0.248 |
| Extremity | 2853(70.8) | 2215(75.9) | <0.001 |
| ISS | 10.0 ± 7.9 | 8.7 ± 7.1 | <0.001 |
| <16 | 3202(79.5) | 2404(82.4) | 0.003 |
| 16-24 | 581(14.4) | 339(11.6) | 0.001 |
| ≥25 | 245(6.1) | 176(6.0) | 0.927 |
| NISS | 11.8 ± 9.7 | 10.1 ± 8.4 | <0.001 |
| TRISS | 0.960 ± 0.109 | 0.964 ± 0.108 | 0.001 |
| Mortality, n(%) | 77(1.9) | 34(1.2) | 0.014 |
| AOR | 0.83 | <0.001 | |
| [95% CI = 0.83–0.86] | |||
| LOS in hospital (days) | 10.1 ± 10.8 | 9.1 ± 9.2 | <0.001 |
| LOS in ICU | |||
| Patients, n(%) | 859(21.3) | 431(14.8) | <0.001 |
| <16 | 281(8.8) | 154(6.4) | 0.001 |
| 16-24 | 364(62.7) | 180(53.1) | 0.004 |
| ≥25 | 214(87.3) | 97(55.1) | <0.001 |
| LOS in ICU (days) | 7.6 ± 9.3 | 6.5 ± 7.7 | 0.002 |
We found a significant difference in GCS scores between male and female patients (14.0 ± 2.6 vs. 14.4 ± 2.1, respectively; p < 0.001), as well as the distribution of scores among the patients (GCS ≤8, 9–12, or ≥13). Female patients had higher GCS scores than did male patients, and a higher proportion of patients with a GCS score of ≥13 were women. In contrast, a higher proportion of patients with a GCS score of either ≤8 or between 9 and 12 were men. Our analysis of AIS scores revealed that male patients had sustained significantly higher rates of injuries to the head/neck, face, and thorax, while female patients sustained significantly higher rates of injuries to the extremities [Table 1]. The comparison of trauma injury scores between the male and female patients indicated significant differences regarding the ISS (10.0 ± 7.9 vs. 8.7 ± 7.1, respectively; p < 0.001). When stratified by injury severity (ISS of <16, 16–24, or ≥25), more women had an ISS of <16 compared to men (82.4% vs. 79.5%, respectively; p = 0.003), while more men had an ISS between 16 and 24, compared to women (14.4% vs. 11.6%, respectively; p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the sex of the patients with an ISS of ≥25. We also found significant differences in male and female patients regarding NISS (11.8 ± 9.7 vs. 10.1 ± 8.4, respectively; p < 0.001), TRISS (0.960 ± 0.109 vs. 0.964 ± 0.108, respectively; p < 0.001), and in-hospital mortality rates (1.9% vs. 1.2%, respectively; p = 0.014). After adjusting for ISS, we found that female patients had a significantly lower AOR for patient mortality than did male patients (AOR 0.83, 95% CI 0.83–0.86), indicating that the differences in injury severity between the sexes are not wholly responsible for their different mortality rates. The mortality of male and female patients is shown based on age-group in Fig. 1, revealing that there was a narrower age-range among women experiencing fatalities compared to men. Further, mortality increased in older patients, regardless of sex. The major injuries associated with mortality are listed in Table 2, and reveal that there was no significant difference between the sexes in trauma causing mortality, except that the female patients had higher odds for sustaining subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.58–9.09; p < 0.001) than the male patients. Women experienced a significantly shorter hospital LOS than men did (9.1 days vs. 10.1 days, respectively; p < 0.001). A significantly smaller proportion of female patients was admitted to the ICU compared to male patients (14.8% vs. 21.3%, respectively; p < 0.001) regardless of ISS stratification (<16, 16–24, or ≥25).
Fig. 1.
Mortality percentage of male and female patients admitted for treatment of motorcycle-related trauma injury under stratification by age of decade.
Table 2.
Injuries attributed to the fatality of male and female motorcycle riders.
| Variables | Male N = 77 | Female N = 34 | Odds ratio (95% CI) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epidural hematoma (EDH) | 23(29.9) | 9(26.5) | 0.83(0.48–2.92) | 0.715 |
| Subdural hematoma (SDH) | 42(54.5) | 20(58.8) | 1.25(0.53–2.70) | 0.676 |
| Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) | 16(20.8) | 17(50.0) | 3.33(1.58–9.09) | 0.002 |
| Intracerebral hematoma (ICH) | 10(13.0) | 4(11.8) | 0.91(0.26–3.03) | 0.858 |
| Cerebral contusion | 17(22.1) | 11(32.4) | 1.67(0.69–4.17) | 0.251 |
| Hemothorax | 8(10.4) | 2(5.9) | 0.53(0.11–2.70) | 0.445 |
| Pneumothorax | 3(3.9) | 3(8.8) | 2.50(0.46–12.5) | 0.290 |
| Hemopneumothorax | 7(9.1) | 2(5.9) | 0.63(0.12–3.13) | 0.568 |
| Lung contusion | 11(14.3) | 3(8.8) | 0.59(0.15–2.22) | 0.424 |
| Hepatic injury | 9(11.7) | 2(5.9) | 0.48(0.10–2.33) | 0.345 |
| Splenic injury | 7(9.1) | 1(2.9) | 0.30(0.04–2.56) | 0.248 |
| Pelvic fracture | 6(7.8) | 1(2.9) | 0.36(0.04–3.13) | 0.332 |
To clarify the influence of alcohol consumption in different gender, further analysis of the patients who have a positive or negative BAC in the subgroup of male and female patients revealed the impact of alcohol intoxication is similar in different gender regarding GCS score, ISS, injury areas based on the AIS, hospital LOS, the proportion of patients admitted to the ICU [Table 3]. However, the significant higher mortality in the patients with a positive BAC than those who had a negative BAC in the male patients (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.41–2.92; p < 0.001) was not found in the female patients (OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.62–11.20; p = 0.191). Additionally, the significant longer ICU LOS in the patients with a positive BAC than those who had a negative BAC in the male patients (p = 0.009) was not revealed in the female patients (p = 0.411). In addition, to investigate the impact of wearing status of helmet on the outcome in different gender, further analysis revealed the impact of helmet-wearing status is similar in different gender regarding GCS score, ISS, injury areas based on the AIS except the abdomen, mortality, the proportion of patients admitted to the ICU, and the ICU LOS [Table 4]. A significant longer hospital LOS in the patients without helmet-wearing than those with helmet-wearing was found in the male patients (p < 0.001), but not the female patients (p = 0.324). Adjusted mortality in propensity-score matched patient population.
Table 3.
Comparison of injury characteristics between those patients who have a positive or negative BAC in the male and female patients.
| Male |
Female |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alcohol>50 n = 564 | Alcohol≦50 n = 3464 | OR(95%CI) | p | Alcohol>50 n = 69 | Alcohol≦50 n = 2850 | OR(95%CI) | p | |
| GCS | 12.1 ± 3.9 | 14.3 ± 2.2 | – | <0.001 | 11.6 ± 4.0 | 14.4 ± 2.0 | – | <0.001 |
| ISS | 13.2 ± 9.8 | 9.5 ± 7.4 | – | <0.001 | 13.3 ± 10.7 | 8.6 ± 6.9 | – | 0.001 |
| AIS≥2, n(%) | ||||||||
| Head/Neck | 249(44.1) | 762(22.0) | 2.8(2.33–3.37) | <0.001 | 30(43.5) | 537(18.8) | 3.3(2.04–5.38) | <0.001 |
| Face | 192(34.0) | 542(15.6) | 2.8(2.29–3.39) | <0.001 | 27(39.1) | 354(12.4) | 4.5(2.76–7.44) | <0.001 |
| Thorax | 94(16.7) | 484(14.0) | 1.2(0.97–1.57) | 0.092 | 9(13.0) | 274(9.6) | 1.4(0.69–2.87) | 0.306 |
| Abdomen | 55(9.8) | 205(5.9) | 1.7(1.26–2.35) | 0.001 | 12(17.4) | 162(5.7) | 3.5(1.84–6.64) | 0.001 |
| Extremity | 252(45.0) | 2216(64.0) | 0.5(0.39–0.55) | <0.001 | 36(52.2) | 1941(68.1) | 0.5(0.32–0.83) | 0.006 |
| Mortality | 21(3.7) | 56(1.6) | 2.4(1.41–2.92) | <0.001 | 2(2.9) | 32(1.1) | 2.6(0.62–11.20) | 0.191 |
| Hospital LOS | ||||||||
| days | 12.2 ± 11.6 | 9.7 ± 10.7 | – | <0.001 | 12.2 ± 10.0 | 9.0 ± 9.2 | – | 0.010 |
| ICU LOS | ||||||||
| n (%) | 214(37.9) | 645(18.6) | 2.7(2.21–3.23) | <0.001 | 23(33.3) | 408(14.3) | 3.0(1.80–4.99) | <0.001 |
| days | 6.5 ± 6.3 | 8.0 ± 10.1 | – | 0.009 | 7.8 ± 8.0 | 6.4 ± 7.7 | – | 0.411 |
Table 4.
Comparison of injury characteristics between those male and female patients with or without helmet-wearing.
| Male |
Female |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helmet(−) n = 551 | Helmet(+) n = 3379 | OR(95%CI) | p | Helmet(−) n = 275 | Helmet(+) n = 2595 | OR(95%CI) | p | |
| GCS | 12.6 ± 3.8 | 14.3 ± 2.1 | – | <0.001 | 13.4 ± 3.3 | 14.5 ± 1.8 | – | <0.001 |
| ISS | 12.9 ± 9.0 | 9.4 ± 7.3 | – | <0.001 | 11.6 ± 8.9 | 8.2 ± 6.3 | – | <0.001 |
| AIS≥ 2, n(%) | ||||||||
| Head/Neck | 281(51.0) | 670(19.8) | 4.2(3.49–5.07) | <0.001 | 110(40.0) | 431(16.6) | 3.3(2.58–4.35) | <0.001 |
| Face | 140(25.4) | 573(17.0) | 1.7(1.35–2.06) | <0.001 | 50(18.2) | 316(12.2) | 1.6(1.15–2.23) | 0.006 |
| Thorax | 74(13.4) | 482(14.3) | 0.9(0.72–1.21) | 0.645 | 30(10.9) | 248(9.6) | 1.2(0.78–1.73) | 0.520 |
| Abdomen | 33(6.0) | 217(6.4) | 0.9(0.64–1.35) | 0.709 | 25(9.1) | 146(5.6) | 1.7(1.08–2.61) | 0.024 |
| Extremity | 235(42.6) | 2199(65.1) | 0.4(0.33–0.48) | <0.001 | 141(51.3) | 1815(69.9) | 0.5(0.35–0.58) | <0.001 |
| Mortality | 22(4.0) | 41(1.2) | 3.4(2.00–5.73) | <0.001 | 8(2.9) | 15(0.6) | 5.2(2.17–12.27) | 0.001 |
| Hospital LOS | ||||||||
| days | 12.2 ± 12.7 | 9.5 ± 9.7 | – | <0.001 | 9.6 ± 9.8 | 9.0 ± 9.1 | – | 0.324 |
| ICU LOS | ||||||||
| n (%) | 213(38.7) | 594(17.6) | 3.0(2.44–3.58) | <0.001 | 83(30.2) | 330(12.7) | 3.0(2.24–3.93) | <0.001 |
| days | 7.9 ± 9.8 | 7.3 ± 8.8 | – | 0.368 | 6.5 ± 6.0 | 6.4 ± 8.0 | – | 0.918 |
To reduce the impact of difference of associated helmet-wearing status and alcohol intoxication on the mortality assessment between the male and female patients, 111 well-balanced pairs of patients were selected for comparison [Table 5]. In these propensity score–matched patients, there was no significant difference in helmet-wearing status and alcohol intoxication. The conditional logistic regression analysis of these well-balanced pairs of patients showed that the gender did not significantly influence mortality (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.74–1.68; p = 0.606), implying the higher odds of mortality of the male patients were attributed to population with a risky behaviors that associated with mortality, such as no helmet-wearing and alcohol intoxication, but not the gender per se.
Table 5.
Covariates of the trauma patients before and after propensity score matching (1:1 greedy matching) for mortality assessment.
| Before |
After |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Death n = 111 | Survival n = 6836 | OR(95%CI) | p | Death n = 111 | Survival n = 111 | OR(95%CI) | p | |
| Helmet, n(%) | ||||||||
| Yes | 56(50.5) | 5918(86.6) | 0.2(0.11–0.23) | <0.001 | 56(50.5) | 56(50.5) | 1.0(0.59–1.69) | 1.000 |
| No | 30(27.0) | 796(11.6) | 2.8(1.84–4.30) | <0.001 | 30(27.0) | 30(27.0) | 1.0(0.55–1.81) | 1.000 |
| Unspecific | 25(22.5) | 122(1.8) | 16.0(9.90–25.85) | <0.001 | 25(22.5) | 25(22.5) | 1.0(0.53–1.88) | 1.000 |
| Alcohol>50, n(%) | 23(20.7) | 610(8.9) | 2.7(1.67–4.25) | <0.001 | 23(20.7) | 23(20.7) | 1.0(0.52–1.91) | 1.000 |
Female patients had lower odds ratios (ORs) for presenting with more severe hemodynamic measures than did the male patients [Table 6]. These measures included heart rates of >100 beats/min (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75–1.68; p = 0.009) and shock indices of >0.9 (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64–0.94; p = 0.010). No significant difference was noted between the sexes in the measures of systolic blood pressure (SBP) of <90 mmHg and respiratory rate of <10 or >29 times/min. In addition, women had lower odds of requiring procedures at the emergency department, including intubation (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.36–0.60; p < 0.001) and chest tube insertion (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.26–0.57; p < 0.001) than men, but similar requirements for cardiopulmonary resuscitation or blood transfusion.
Table 6.
Physiological status on arrival and procedures performed at the emergency department.
| Variables | Male N = 4028 | Female N = 2919 | Odds Ratio (95%CI) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physiology at ER, n(%) | ||||
| SBP < 90 mmHg | 104(2.6) | 71(2.4) | 0.91(0.22–1.28) | 0.695 |
| Heart rate > 100 beats/min | 825(20.5) | 524(18.0) | 0.83(0.75–1.68) | 0.009 |
| Respiratory rate <10 or >29 | 34(0.8) | 16(0.5) | 0.67(0.36–1.18) | 0.150 |
| Shock index >0.9 | 298(7.4) | 170(5.8) | 0.77(0.64–0.94) | 0.010 |
| Proceduresat ER, n(%) | ||||
| Cardiopulmonary resuscitation | 9(0.2) | 6(0.2) | 0.91(0.33–2.56) | 0.874 |
| Intubation | 255(6.3) | 89(3.0) | 0.48(0.36–0.60) | <0.001 |
| Chest tube | 115(2.9) | 33(1.1) | 0.38(0.26–0.57) | <0.001 |
| Blood transfusion | 159(3.9) | 105(3.6) | 0.91(0.70–1.16) | 0.451 |
Table 7 shows the findings regarding the types of injuries associated with motorcycle accidents. A significantly higher percentage of female motorcycle riders sustained SAH, as well as lumbar vertebral, sacral vertebral, humeral, radial, ulnar, pelvic, tibial, and calcaneal fractures. However, compared to men, women had a significantly lower percentage of cranial, cervical vertebral, maxillary, mandibular, nasal, rib, scapular, femoral, and patella fractures, as well as epidural (EDH), subdural (SDH), and intracerebral (ICH) hematomas, pneumothorax, hemopneumothorax, lung contusions, and splenic, retroperitoneal, and renal injuries.
Table 7.
Associated injuries of the male and female motorcycle riders.
| Variables | Male N = 4028 | Female N = 2919 | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Head trauma, n(%) | |||
| Neurologic deficit | 40(1.0) | 21(0.7) | 0.228 |
| Cranial fracture* | 443(11.0) | 157(5.4) | <0.001 |
| Epidural hematoma (EDH)* | 288(7.1) | 91(3.1) | <0.001 |
| Subdural hematoma (SDH)* | 502(12.5) | 240(8.2) | <0.001 |
| Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)+ | 293(7.3) | 319(10.9) | <0.001 |
| Intracerebral hematoma (ICH)* | 113(2.8) | 55(1.9) | 0.014 |
| Cerebral contusion | 257(6.4) | 164(5.6) | 0.189 |
| Cervical vertebral fracture* | 38(0.9) | 14(0.5) | 0.027 |
| Maxillofacial trauma, n(%) | |||
| Maxillary fracture* | 454(11.3) | 241(8.3) | <0.001 |
| Mandibular fracture* | 164(4.1) | 89(3.0) | 0.025 |
| Orbital fracture | 126(3.1) | 72(2.5) | 0.102 |
| Nasal fracture* | 74(1.8) | 31(1.1) | 0.009 |
| Thoracic trauma, n(%) | |||
| Rib fracture* | 506(12.6) | 278(9.5) | <0.001 |
| Sternal fracture | 5(0.1) | 4(0.1) | 0.883 |
| Hemothorax | 88(2.2) | 45(1.5) | 0.054 |
| Pneumothorax* | 108(2.7) | 38(1.3) | <0.001 |
| Lung contusion* | 82(2.0) | 20(0.7) | <0.001 |
| Hemopneumothorax* | 87(2.2) | 25(0.9) | <0.001 |
| Thoracic vertebral fracture | 30(0.7) | 20(0.7) | 0.772 |
| Abdominal trauma, n(%) | |||
| Intra-abdominal injury | 68(1.7) | 42(1.4) | 0.411 |
| Hepatic injury | 119(3.0) | 68(2.3) | 0.112 |
| Splenic injury* | 74(1.8) | 31(1.1) | 0.009 |
| Retroperitoneal injury* | 12(0.3) | 1(0.0) | 0.012 |
| Renal injury* | 37(0.9) | 10(0.3) | 0.004 |
| Urinary bladder injury | 12(0.3) | 3(0.1) | 0.084 |
| Lumbar vertebral fracture+ | 36(0.9) | 46(1.6) | 0.009 |
| Sacral vertebral fracture+ | 17(0.4) | 23(0.8) | 0.047 |
| Extremity trauma, n(%) | |||
| Scapular fracture* | 118(2.9) | 49(1.7) | 0.001 |
| Clavicle fracture | 554(13.8) | 361(12.4) | 0.092 |
| Humeral fracture+ | 150(3.7) | 219(7.5) | <0.001 |
| Radial fracture+ | 334(8.3) | 386(13.2) | <0.001 |
| Ulnar fracture+ | 176(4.4) | 179(6.1) | 0.001 |
| Metacarpal fracture | 158(3.9) | 97(3.3) | 0.190 |
| Pelvic fracture+ | 122(3.0) | 122(4.2) | 0.010 |
| Femoral fracture* | 494(12.3) | 267(9.1) | <0.001 |
| Patella fracture* | 146(3.6) | 49(1.7) | <0.001 |
| Tibial fracture+ | 406(10.1) | 349(12.0) | 0.013 |
| Fibular fracture | 239(5.9) | 162(5.5) | 0.499 |
| Calcaneal fracture+ | 197(4.9) | 181(6.2) | 0.018 |
| Metatarsal fracture | 97(2.4) | 89(3.0) | 0.102 |
* Indicates a higher incidence of male than female patients; + indicates a higher incidence of female than male patients.
Discussion
In the present study, the influential role of sex upon different characteristics of motorcycle accident-related injuries was investigated. The female patients were younger, more often pillions, wore helmets, were transported by EMS, and arrived at the emergency department between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. The age distribution of the female patients is different from that of the male patients; fewer female patients were aged between 10–39 and 80–89 years, while more female patients were aged between 50 and 69. This finding is partly consistent with the report that among young motorcycle drivers (14–24 years), the risk of slight injury is higher in men than in women, a trend which is reversed in older age groups (25–54 and 65–74 years) [5]. Some authors have reported the relationship between this increased risk for young men and their greater inclination to engage in risky behaviors, such as speeding, consumption of alcohol or drugs, etc., compared to women [12], [13], [14]. In the current study, a positive BAC was found more frequently among men than women. Notably, it has been reported in Taiwan that those patients having undergone an alcohol test also had higher ISS, NISS, and in-hospital mortality [15].
According to the analysis of 10,607 motorcyclists who were admitted to hospital following accidents in the Netherlands [15], upper extremity and spine injuries (25.7% and 5.9%, respectively) were the most common injury types. When considering only the most severe injuries, severe thorax (24.3%) and severe lower extremity (39.1%) injuries were most common [15]. In this study, the distribution of the injury location was different from that of previous reports. Based on analysis of AIS, our study revealed that 73.0% of injuries were localized to the extremities, followed by head/neck (32.9%) and face (25.0%). In addition, the women presented with a different bodily injury pattern than the men. Female patients sustained significantly higher rates of extremity injuries, but lower rates of head/neck, face, and thorax injuries than male patients did. The injury types are different between the sexes; a significantly higher percentage of female motorcycle riders sustained SAH, as well as lumbar vertebral, sacral vertebral, humeral, radial, ulnar, pelvic, tibial, and calcaneal fractures. Investigation of the impact of wearing status of helmet on the outcome in different gender revealed the wearing of helmet was associated with a higher incidence of injures to the extremities than those without helmet-wearing both in male and female patients. Furthermore, the female riders still sustained a higher incidence of extremities than those male riders regardless of helmet-wearing status. Therefore, the reason that the female motorcycle riders tend to have more limb injuries than male patients could not be explained by the helmet-wearing status. Additionally, the patients without helmet-wearing sustained an remarkably significant higher incidence of injuries to head/neck region than those who had worn the helmet regardless the gender of patients; therefore, the fewer incidence of head/neck injuries in female than male patients could not be explained by a higher incidence of helmet-wearing of female motorcycle riders and may be due to other unidentified factors.
A previous study found that the risk of fatal injury is higher in men than in women aged 25–34 years when using time travelled as a measure of exposure [5]. In a time-series study with data from 580 motorcyclist fatalities in the Brazilian Federal District from 1996 to 2007, most of the deaths were in men (94.3%) and those aged between 20 and 39 years (73.8%) [16]. When comparing age-groups for the 10,607 hospitalized Dutch motorcyclists, the relative risk (RR) of death following a motorcycle accident after hospital admission was highest in the youngest age group (RR: 1.64, 95% CI:1.24–2.16) [15]. In Taiwan, motorcyclist fatalities account for nearly 60% of all driving fatalities [17], often associated with men, and factors including advanced age, unlicensed status, not wearing a helmet, and riding under the influence of alcohol, particularly after heavy alcohol consumption (>550 cc) [17]. In this study, after the reduction of the impact of associated helmet-wearing status and alcohol intoxication on the mortality assessment between the male and female patients, the logistic regression analysis of these propensity score-matched patients showed that the gender did not significantly influence mortality (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.47–1.43; p = 0.475), implying the an associated risky behaviors may attribute to the difference of odds of mortality between the male and female patients. In the current study, head injuries (including EDH, SDH, SAH, ICH, and cerebral contusions) were the major factor leading to mortality, followed by thoracic (including hemothorax, hemopneumothorax, and lung contusion), and abdominal (including hepatic and splenic) injuries. Of note, our data also shows that besides the aforementioned injuries, pelvic injuries also caused fatalities in motorcycle riders, regardless of sex.
In the 10,607 hospitalized Dutch motorcyclists, those who were fatally injured were most frequently diagnosed with severe head injury (47%), followed by thoracic injury (20%) [15]. Among a number of preventive measures, helmet-wearing in particular has been shown to both protect against head and other serious injuries, and be cost effective [18], [19], [20]. In the current study, the female motorcycle riders were more likely to wear a helmet than the male motorcycle riders. A significant difference in GCS scores and the distribution of scores between the sexes (GCS ≤8, 9–12, or ≥13) was also found. In addition, female motorcycle riders sustained a significantly lower percentage of intracranial injuries including cranial fracture, EDH, SDH, and ICH. These findings indicate that helmet-wearing may have prevented head injuries among the female motorcycle riders studied. However, a significantly higher percentage of female motorcycle riders sustained SAH. Women experience a greater number of intracranial aneurysms than men [21], [22]. It has been reported that not only do more women suffer from SAH, but that the average age of female SAH survivors is greater, compared to male survivors; however, the overall mortality and neurological outcomes for men are not better, despite their younger age [23]. Sex appears to influence the risk, initial impact, and early phase of SAH, while age influences its outcome [23], [24].
The limitations of this study include its retrospective design and the lack of available data regarding injury mechanism and circumstance, including motorcycle speed and type, helmet material, and exposure data (e.g., number of trips, hours of riding, and/or miles traveled). Although some identified factors may explain a better outcome of the female motorcycle riders than those male patients, however, these factors may not be independent from each other (for example, those who was drunken when riding tend not to wear the helmet, and BAC level had been reported to be related to the sustained injury severity [25], [26], [27]) and it is hard to clarify their real impacts on the outcome from this retrospective study. Additionally, the number of patients we included in the study was not adequate to analyze the association of age with different accident characteristics, other than mortality. Thus, it is not possible to describe the effect of age on the various risk factors experienced by the two sexes, as has been previously described [5], [28]. Finally, the injured patients who were pronounced dead at the scene of the accident or those who were discharged from the emergency department were not included in the sample, which may have introduced a survival bias.
Conclusion
This study analyzed the differences between the sexes in the demographics and injury characteristics of patients hospitalized at a level I trauma center with motorcycle-related. Analysis of the data indicates that women motorcycle riders have unique injury characteristics, including bodily injury pattern, as well as a lower ISS and in-hospital mortality when compared to male motorcycle riders.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgement
This research was supported by a grant from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CDRPG8C0033).
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of Chang Gung University.
References
- 1.McAndrews C., Beyer K., Guse C.E., Layde P. Revisiting exposure: fatal and non-fatal traffic injury risk across different populations of travelers in Wisconsin, 2001-2009. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;60:103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) May 2013. 2011 motorcycles traffic safety fact sheet. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811765.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Weiss H., Agimi Y., Steiner C. Youth motorcycle-related brain injury by state helmet law type: United States, 2005-2007. Pediatrics. 2010;126:1149–1155. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Beck L.F., Dellinger A.M., O'Neil M.E. Motor vehicle crash injury rates by mode of travel, United States: using exposure-based methods to quantify differences. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:212–218. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Santamarina-Rubio E., Perez K., Olabarria M., Novoa A.M. Gender differences in road traffic injury rate using time travelled as a measure of exposure. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;65:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Massie D.L., Green P.E., Campbell K.L. Crash involvement rates by driver gender and the role of average annual mileage. Accid Anal Prev. 1997;29:675–685. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(97)00037-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Massie D.L., Campbell K.L., Williams A.F. Traffic accident involvement rates by driver age and gender. Accid Anal Prev. 1995;27:73–87. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(94)00050-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nwadiaro H.C., Ekwe K.K., Akpayak I.C., Shitta H. Motorcycle injuries in North-Central Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2011;14:186–189. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.84012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Preusser D.F., Williams A.F., Ulmer R.G. Analysis of fatal motorcycle crashes: crash typing. Accid Anal Prev. 1995;27:845–851. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(95)00027-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Densmore J.C., Lim H.J., Oldham K.T., Guice K.S. Outcomes and delivery of care in pediatric injury. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:92–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.10.013. discussion -8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rogers S.C., Campbell B.T., Saleheen H., Borrup K., Lapidus G. Using trauma registry data to guide injury prevention program activities. J Trauma. 2010;69:S209–S213. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f1e9fe. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Clarke D.D., Ward P., Bartle C., Truman W. Killer crashes: fatal road traffic accidents in the UK. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42:764–770. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Santamarina-Rubio E., Perez K., Ricart I., Rodriguez-Sanz M., Rodriguez-Martos A., Brugal M.T. Substance use among road traffic casualties admitted to emergency departments. Inj Prev. 2009;15:87–94. doi: 10.1136/ip.2008.019679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Clarke D.D., Ward P., Bartle C., Truman W. Young driver accidents in the UK: the influence of age, experience, and time of day. Accid Anal Prev. 2006;38:871–878. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Leijdesdorff H.A., Siegerink B., Sier C.F., Reurings M.C., Schipper I.B. Injury pattern, injury severity, and mortality in 33,495 hospital-admitted victims of motorized two-wheeled vehicle crashes in The Netherlands. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72:1363–1368. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318250cced. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Montenegro Mde M., Duarte E.C., Prado R.R., Nascimento Ade F. Mortality of motorcyclists in traffic accidents in the brazilian federal District from 1996 to 2007. Rev Saude Publica. 2011;45:529–538. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102011000300011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jou R.C., Yeh T.H., Chen R.S. Risk factors in motorcyclist fatalities in Taiwan. Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13:155–162. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.641166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hundley J.C., Kilgo P.D., Miller P.R., Chang M.C., Hensberry R.A., Meredith J.W. Non-helmeted motorcyclists: a burden to society? A study using the National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma. 2004;57:944–949. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000149497.20065.f4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.MacLeod J.B., Digiacomo J.C., Tinkoff G. An evidence-based review: helmet efficacy to reduce head injury and mortality in motorcycle crashes: EAST practice management guidelines. J Trauma. 2010;69:1101–1111. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f8a9cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schneider WHt, Savolainen P.T., Van Boxel D., Beverley R. Examination of factors determining fault in two-vehicle motorcycle crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2012;45:669–676. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kongable G.L., Lanzino G., Germanson T.P., Truskowski L.L., Alves W.M., Torner J.C. Gender-related differences in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 1996;84:43–48. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.84.1.0043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Longstreth W.T., Jr., Koepsell T.D., Yerby M.S., van Belle G. Risk factors for subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 1985;16:377–385. doi: 10.1161/01.str.16.3.377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Friedrich V., Bederson J.B., Sehba F.A. Gender influences the initial impact of subarachnoid hemorrhage: an experimental investigation. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Renner C., Hummelsheim H., Kopczak A., Steube D., Schneider H.J., Schneider M. The influence of gender on the injury severity, course and outcome of traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2012;26:1360–1371. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.667592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Plurad D., Demetriades D., Gruzinski G., Preston C., Chan L., Gaspard D. Motor vehicle crashes: the association of alcohol consumption with the type and severity of injuries and outcomes. J Emerg Med. 2010;38:12–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.09.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ristic B., Rancic N., Maksimovic M., Ignjatovic-Ristic D. The influence of alcohol intoxication on the severity of injuries suffered by drivers in road traffic accidents. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013;39:363–368. doi: 10.1007/s00068-013-0276-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Waller P.F., Hill E.M., Maio R.F., Blow F.C. Alcohol effects on motor vehicle crash injury. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003;27:695–703. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000062758.18918.7C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Awadzi K.D., Classen S., Hall A., Duncan R.P., Garvan C.W. Predictors of injury among younger and older adults in fatal motor vehicle crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40:1804–1810. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]