Abstract
The cytotoxicity of alloying elements in newly developed biodegradable metals can be assessed through relatively low-cost and rapid in vitro studies using different cell types. However, such approaches have limitations; as such, additional investigations in small mammalian models are required that recapitulate the physiological environment. In this study, we established a zebrafish (Danio rerio) model for cytotoxicity evaluations that combines the physiological aspects of an animal model with the speed and simplicity of a cell-based assay. The model was used to assess the cytotoxicity of five common alloying elements in biodegradable implant materials. Conventional in vitro testing using heart, liver, and endothelial cell lines performed in parallel with zebrafish studies revealed statistically significant differences in toxicity (up to 100-fold), along with distinct changes in the morphology of the heart, liver, and blood vessels that were undetectable in cell cultures. These results indicate that our zebrafish model is a useful alternative to mammalian systems for accurately and rapidly evaluating the in vivo toxicity of newly developed metallic materials.
Introduction
Biomedical implants constructed from magnesium (Mg) alloys that degrade over time have been shown to promote tissue repair and regeneration—for instance, in bone fracture healing and cardiovascular disease1–4. Biodegradable metallic materials provide mechanical support that allows damaged tissues to heal sufficiently, and then degrade over time as they are completely replaced by normal host tissue5–7. Substituting currently used inert implant materials with biodegradable alternatives eliminates the need for a second surgery to remove the implanted device, circumvents complications arising from implants that loosen with increasing age and changes in body size and shape (e.g., as a result of age-related bone loss), and reduces the socio-economic burden of an aging society on the healthcare system8,9.
Selection of an alloying element is a critical aspect of the material development process, as the functionality and mechanical properties of the material can be improved by modifying the type and quantity of the alloy10,11. Common alloying elements for Mg-based biodegradable metallic implants include biocompatible elements such as calcium (Ca) and zinc (Zn); the rare earth element yttrium (Y) (which is linked to liver toxicity) and aluminum (Al) (which is associated with Alzheimer’s disease) are also often integrated into materials to improve mechanical properties and increase corrosion resistance. As these alloys are in direct contact with living tissues, it is critical to determine the toxicity of particles released from the implant as it degrades12–15.
The toxicity of biodegradable materials is initially evaluated in vitro using different cell types treated with a metal ion in chloride form or an extract of the degrading alloy in medium16–19, with cell viability serving as a measure of cytotoxicity. Such assays are efficient in terms of time and cost. However, two-dimensional cell monolayers cannot recapitulate all aspects of the complex in vivo physiological environment. Small mammalian models are more useful in this regard for evaluating toxicity and estimating the biodegradation profile of alloying elements in humans.
For decades, mice, rats, rabbits, and dogs have been used for toxicology experiments, but these experiments are often expensive and time consuming20. An in vivo model using zebrafish (Danio rerio) was recently proposed for nanotoxicity assessment21,22 based on the homology between fish and human genomes and anatomical and physiological similarities of the cardiovascular, nervous, and digestive systems23–25. Zebrafish embryos take less than 1 week to generate these major organ structures26,27 and remain transparent throughout development, allowing real-time observation of this process28,29. Additionally, with the high fecundity rate of 200–300 eggs per day every 5–7 days, the cost and time of toxicity testing are significantly reduced compared to those when using larger animals30,31. Thus, using a zebrafish model to evaluate the in vivo toxicity of degrading particles from newly developed biodegradable metal implants can accelerate the material development process to clinical application, while circumventing the ethical considerations associated with using mammals as research tools (Fig. 1).
In the present study, zebrafish embryos were treated with different concentrations of the five most commonly used elements for alloying with biodegradable metal (Mg, Zn, Ca, Y, and Al ions) to assess their toxicity. Standard cellular toxicity tests using established heart, liver, and endothelial cell lines were carried out in parallel to compare in vitro and in vivo toxicities. Transgenic zebrafish lines expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) or red fluorescent protein (RFP; DsRed) in the blood vessels, heart and liver, and nervous system under the control of the promoters of fetal liver kinase (flk)1, cardiac myosin light chain (cmlc)2, liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (lfabp), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and oligodendrocyte transcription factor (olig)2 were used to visualize developmental defects in these tissues caused by the alloying ions at various concentrations.
Results and Discussion
Effects of MgCl2, ZnCl2, and CaCl2in vitro and in a zebrafish model
The viability of Huh7 hepatocytes, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), and HL-1 cardiac muscle-like cells treated with Mg2+, Zn2+, and Ca2+ for 12 h was evaluated. The viability of HL-1 and Huh7 cells was unaffected by treatment with Mg2+ up to 48 mM, after which viability decreased to 67.49% ± 4.00% at 64 mM and 61.80% ± 13.85% at 128 mM (Fig. 2a). HUVECs were more sensitive than the other two cell types, with a reduction in viability from 103.22% ± 0.58% to below 44.44% ± 0.34% with increasing Mg2+ concentration (16 to 64 mM). Treatment with Zn2+ had a less potent effect on the viability profiles of all cell types, which remained above the baseline value (100%) at concentrations up to 125 μM and diminished at a concentration higher than 250 μM (Fig. 2a). For example, the viability of cells exposed to 250 μM Zn was 88.87% ± 0.94%, 59.50% ± 11.52%, and 64.36% ± 5.30% for HL-1 and Huh7 cells and HUVECs, respectively. In cells treated with Ca2+, viability decreased at concentrations of 48, 32, and 16 mM for HL-1 and Huh7 cells and HUVECs, respectively (Fig. 2a).
To clarify the in vivo biological effects of Mg, Zn, and Ca ions released from biodegradable metal, zebrafish embryos were treated with increasing concentrations of MgCl2, ZnCl2, and CaCl2 starting 6 hours after fertilization (hpf). Unhatched eggs and dead or abnormal larvae were classified as biological defects. We initially tested the same concentration ranges as in the in vitro cell viability assay. Defects were observed in groups treated with 8 mM MgCl2 and reached 100% at concentrations of 48 mM or higher (Fig. 2b,c). In ZnCl2-treated groups, biological defects began to appear at 32 μM and reached 100% at concentrations greater than 250 μM. In the presence of CaCl2, biological defects were noted starting at 64 mM, reaching 100% at 128 mM and higher concentrations (Fig. 2b,c). These results confirm the in vitro findings that Mg, Zn, and Ca ions impair cell growth.
As the blood vessels and heart are among the first organs that are exposed to foreign substances during development, we evaluated embryonic defects in these tissues following exposure to alloy elements using the vasculature (Tg(flk1:EGFP)) and cardiac (Tg(cmlc2:EGFP)) transgenic zebrafish lines that express EGFP at the surface of blood vessels and cardiac tissue, respectively. We used the ion concentrations that caused biological defects in 100% of samples in the previous experiment. Embryos treated with MgCl2 had normal blood vessels throughout development, whereas abnormalities were observed in those treated with ZnCl2 and CaCl2 (Fig. 3a). Among Tg(cmlc2:EGFP) zebrafish embryos, only those treated with 128 mM CaCl2 showed abnormal heart phenotypes (Fig. 3b). The effect on cardiac function was assessed by counting the heartbeat at 72 and 96 hpf. Embryos treated with Mg, Ca, and Zn showed a decreased heart rate compared to control group embryos (Fig. 3c), particularly those treated with CaCl2 (Supplementary Table 2). Previous in vitro biocompatibility studies showed that the viability of human fetal osteoblasts treated with Mg and Zn ions was 100% at much higher doses32. These results demonstrate that the influx of biocompatible metallic ions into the living body affects the vascular system and causes heart function to deteriorate at a much lower dosage.
The liver is responsible for detoxification of harmful substances introduced into the body. To examine the effects of MgCl2, ZnCl2, and CaCl2 on liver development, we used the Tg(lfabp:DsRed) zebrafish line that expresses RFP specifically in the liver (Fig. 3d). The relative size of the liver was measured to identify any liver defects. We observed that liver size decreased by 55.82% ± 2.06%, 55.66% ± 20.07%, and 13.52% ± 4.89% at 96 hpf in the presence of MgCl2 (64 mM), ZnCl2 (500 μM), and CaCl2 (128 mM), respectively, compared to that of controls. This decrease was confirmed by examining Tg(lfabp:RFP) embryos treated with the various ions by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 3e). Importantly, biological defects were induced at significantly lower concentrations than the cell viability experiments would suggest (Supplementary Table 1).
Biological effects of YCl3in vitro and in a zebrafish model
The viability of hepatocytes and endothelial and cardiac muscle-like cell lines following exposure to increasing concentrations of Y3+ ion for 12 h was largely unaffected at concentrations up to 25 μM in all groups. However, there was a marked reduction in viability at 200, 50, and 100 μM for HL-1 and Huh7 cells and HUVECs, respectively.
To assess the biological effect of Y released from a biodegradable Mg alloy, zebrafish embryos were treated with various concentrations of YCl3 (5 μM to 4 mM). Biological defects were observed in the 5 μM treatment group, and reached 100% in embryos treated with concentration higher than 50 μM (Fig. 4b,c and Supplementary Table 1).
We used the Tg(flk1:EGFP) and Tg(cmlc2:EGFP) zebrafish lines to observe the effect of Y on cardiac tissue and vessels. Embryos treated with 25 μM YCl3 showed heart defects, and exposure to a concentration of 50 μM resulted in cardiac edema and a bent tail (Fig. 4d). A closer examination revealed significant cardiac abnormalities, including delayed heart development and a reduced heart rate (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Movies 1 and 2). In particular, a marked decrease in heart rate—which is closely related to cardiac function—was observed in the presence of 50 μM YCl3. Thus, YCl3 introduced into a living organism at concentrations greater than 25 μM could lead to blood vessel defects, deterioration of heart function, and diminished heart rate.
There was a slight difference in liver size between Tg(lfabp:DsRed) embryos treated with 25 μM YCl3 and control group embryos at 96 and 168 hpf. In contrast, liver size was significantly reduced in embryos treated with 50 μM YCl3 to 66.20% ± 6.23% at 96 hpf and 50.58% ± 8.49% at 168 hpf. This was supported by morphological and phenotypic analyses (Fig. 4f,e), indicating that the toxic effects from Y ions are to some extent tolerated up to a concentration of 25 μM. Previous in vitro studies have shown that YCl3 is toxic at concentrations of 1 mM or higher33. Our in vitro and in vivo results demonstrate that YCl3 induces toxicity at concentrations above 50 μM.
Biological effects of AlCl3 in a zebrafish model
The viability of HL-1 and Huh7 cells and HUVECs was decreased to 64.25% ± 10.72%, 47.88% ± 6.74%, and 76.19% ± 0.14% at AlCl3 concentrations of 200, 100, and 400 μM, respectively (Fig. 5a). In zebrafish embryos, nervous system defects began to appear in the presence of 2.5 μM AlCl3, and reached 100% at concentrations above 25 μM (Fig. 5b,c and Supplementary Table 1).
The effect of Al ions on the circulatory system was evaluated using the Tg(flk1:EGFP) and Tg(cmlc2:EGFP) zebrafish lines. Embryos treated with 25 μM of AlCl3 showed a bent trunk phenotype; moreover, the overall structure of the tissue was disorganized, resulting in an abnormal morphology (Fig. 5d). Although there were no heart deformities, heart rate decreased in a concentration- and treatment time-dependent manner (Fig. 5e, and Supplementary Movies 3–6). These results indicate that, even at low concentrations, Al induces vascular defects and reduces cardiac function.
To examine the effects of AlCl3 on liver development, Tg(lfabp:DsRed) zebrafish expressing RFP in the liver were treated with varying concentrations of AlCl3. Concentrations of 10 and 25 μM decreased liver size to 36.43% ± 3.63% and 41.5% ± 3.55%, respectively, at 96 hpf (Fig. 5g), which was confirmed by microscopic examination (Fig. 5f). Evaluation of Al on neuronal growth was also performed in vivo using the Tg(GFAP:EGFP) and Tg(olig2:DsRed) transformation zebrafish model. However, Al had no effect on neurogenesis (Supplementary Fig. 1). Previous cell viability studies have shown that AlCl3 induces toxicity at concentrations of 800 μM or higher33; however, our in vivo results show that biological defects appear at 5 μM AlCl3, which is almost 10 times lower.
Conclusions
Biocompatibility assessments of biodegradable Mg alloys have mostly used osteoblasts, macrophages, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells32,34–36. This has yielded variable rates of cell viability; moreover, some cell types are much more resilient to toxic ions than living tissues. It is presumed that in vivo studies provide more reliable data on biocompatibility. However, the high cost and longer observation time required have limited such evaluations in the development of biodegradable Mg alloys. To this end, transgenic zebrafish are a useful in vivo model that allows direct observation of developmental defects in specific organs caused by exposure to alloying elements37,38. Despite the hepatotoxicity of yttrium39 and the link between aluminum and Alzheimer’s disease40, these elements are often used for alloying to improve material strength and increase corrosion resistance. Studies have often demonstrated the safety of these alloys using cellular viability analyses and have emphasized that the amount of these elements are not substantial in the alloy system. However, the results of the present study clearly show that the in vivo biological responses to these toxic elements occur at significantly lower concentration than that observed in in vitro cellular assays. Utilization of zebrafish embryo allows fast, efficient, and accurate observation of in vivo toxicity of such alloy systems. This method can be further applied to test the extract media from the degrading alloys to observe the real-time toxicity of degrading particles.
Methods
Cell cultures
HL-1 cardiac muscle-like cells, Huh7 hepatocytes, and HUVECs were used for in vitro studies. HL-1 cells (gift from Dr. Craig Lygate, University of Oxford) were grown in Claycomb medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin-streptomycin, and 1% l-glutamine in a fibronectin/gelatin pre-coated culture dish. Huh7 cells (gift from Dr. Leanne Hodson, University of Oxford) were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. HUVECs (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were maintained in endothelial cell growth medium. All cells were cultured under standard conditions (37 °C, 5% CO2).
Cell viability assay
Cell viability was evaluated using a water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST)-1 colorimetric assay (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). Huh7 cells and HUVECs were seeded at a density of 1 × 104 cells/cm2 in a 96-well plate. HL-1 cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 104 cells/cm2 in a fibronectin/gelatin pre-coated 96-well plate. After 24 h, WST-1 reagent was added to the cultures, followed by incubation for an additional 2 h. Enzymatic activity was measured at 450 nm on a spectrophotometer. Data were calibrated to the absorbance value of cell-free medium and then normalized to the value for cells cultured without ion treatment.
Chemical treatment of zebrafish embryos
MgCl2, ZnCl2, CaCl2, YCl3, and AlCl3 were dissolved with distilled water and diluted with zebrafish embryo medium in 6-well plates. A total of 10–15 zebrafish embryos were treated at 6 hpf with MgCl2, ZnCl2, CaCl2, YCl3, and AlCl3 solutions at various concentrations. The embryos were observed with Stemi 2000, Imager Z1, and Axioskop (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and MZFL III, S6D, and DMI6000B (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) microscope systems. The assay was repeated three times.
Zebrafish models
We used Tg(flk1:EGFP), Tg(cmlc2:EGFP), Tg(lfabp:DsRed), Tg(GFAP:EGFP), and Tg(olig2:DsRed) zebrafish lines and wild-type (standard AB strain) zebrafish were used for in vivo experiments. Each zebrafish line was maintained at 28 °C under a 14:10-h light/dark cycle. Embryos were collected following natural mating of the parent zebrafish.
Zebrafish embryo developmental toxicity test
Developmental toxicity was evaluated using embryos at 6 hpf with two or three replicates per exposure group and 10–15 fertilized eggs per replicate. The test solutions were refreshed once every 2 days after the initial exposure. During the experimental period, the number of unhatched eggs and dead and abnormal larvae were recorded to calculate the rate of biological defects [biological defects = (unhatched egg + total dead larvae + surviving abnormal larvae)/(initial count)]. Developmental toxicity was monitored by microscopy after exposure to YCl3 and AlCl3 at approximately 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hpf.
Examination of heart function
Wild-type zebrafish served as the control group for heartbeat counts at 48, 72, and 96 hpf. The number of heartbeats in 15 s was counted in five zebrafish from each group.
Statistical analysis
Sigmoidal dose-response curves were generated for zebrafish embryos exposed to MgCl2, ZnCl2, CaCl2, YCl3, and AlCl3. The combined effects of the mixtures were evaluated with a post hoc Student–Newman–Keuls test following one-way analysis of variance using SigmaPlot v.12.5 software (Systat, San Jose, CA, USA). Data are shown as the mean and ± standard error of mean. Statistical significance was set as p < 0.05.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
H.H. thanks Prof. Afsie Sabokbar (University of Oxford) for guidance and gratefully acknowledges Clarendon Scholarship from the Clarendon Fund. J.R.E acknowledges Arthritis Research UK Fellowship (20631). This work was supported by the KIST Institutional Program (Project No. 2Z05190: Global Mobility Program) and by the Industrial Core Technology Development Program (10077595), funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE).
Author Contributions
H.H., G.H.J. and I.J. wrote the manuscript. H.H., H.S. and I.J. designed the in vitro experiments. H.H., J.P. and G.H.J. designed the in vivo experiments and interpreted the data. S.G.J., H.K.S. and K.H.L. helped with experimental designs. D.M., Y.C.K. and J.R.E. designed the research and supervised the project. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Hyung-Seop Han, Gun Hyuk Jang and Indong Jun contributed equally.
Contributor Information
Yu-Chan Kim, Email: chany@kist.re.kr.
James R. Edwards, Email: james.edwards@ndorms.ox.ac.uk
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-32313-5.
References
- 1.Lee JW, et al. Long-term clinical study and multiscale analysis of in vivo biodegradation mechanism of Mg alloy. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:716–721. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518238113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cha, P. R. et al. Biodegradability engineering of biodegradable Mg alloys: Tailoring the electrochemical properties and microstructure of constituent phases. Sci Rep-Uk3 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 3.Cho SY, et al. Biocompatibility and strength retention of biodegradable Mg-Ca-Zn alloy bone implants. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2013;101B:201–212. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.32813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li YC, Wong CS, Wen C, Hodgson PD. Biodegradable Mg-Zr-Ca alloys for bone implant materials. Mater Technol. 2012;27:49–51. doi: 10.1179/175355511X13240279339482. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pogorielov M, Husak E, Solodivnik A, Zhdanov S. Magnesium-based biodegradable alloys: Degradation, application, and alloying elements. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2017;9:27–38. doi: 10.1556/1646.9.2017.1.04. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhao DL, et al. In vivo characterization of magnesium alloy biodegradation using electrochemical H-2 monitoring, ICP-MS, and XPS. Acta Biomater. 2017;50:556–565. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Seitz JM, Eifler R, Bach FW, Maier HJ. Magnesium degradation products: Effects on tissue and human metabolism. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102:3744–3753. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Reith, G. et al. Metal implant removal: benefits and drawbacks - a patient survey. Bmc Surg15 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9.Bachoura A, Yoshida R, Lattermann C, Kamineni S. Late removal of titanium hardware from the elbow is problematic. ISRN orthopedics. 2012;2012:256239. doi: 10.5402/2012/256239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ding YF, Wen CE, Hodgson P, Li YC. Effects of alloying elements on the corrosion behavior and biocompatibility of biodegradable magnesium alloys: a review. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2:1912–1933. doi: 10.1039/C3TB21746A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Radha R, Sreekanth D. Insight of magnesium alloys and composites for orthopedic implant applications - a review. J Magnes Alloy. 2017;5:286–312. doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2017.08.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nabiyouni M, Bruckner T, Zhou H, Gbureck U, Bhaduri SB. Magnesium-based bioceramics in orthopedic applications. Acta Biomater. 2018;66:23–43. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cipriano AF, et al. Degradation of Bioresorbable Mg-4Zn-1Sr Intramedullary Pins and Associated Biological Responses in Vitro and in Vivo. Acs Appl Mater Inter. 2017;9:44332–44355. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b15975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li X, et al. Design of magnesium alloys with controllable degradation for biomedical implants: From bulk to surface. Acta Biomater. 2016;45:2–30. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zheng YF, Gu XN, Witte F. Biodegradable metals. Mat Sci Eng R. 2014;77:1–34. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2014.01.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Huang T, Cheng J, Bian D, Zheng YF. Fe-Au and Fe-Ag composites as candidates for biodegradable stent materials. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2016;104:225–240. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Murni NS, Dambatta MS, Yeap SK, Froemming GRA, Hermawan H. Cytotoxicity evaluation of biodegradable Zn-3Mg alloy toward normal human osteoblast cells. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater. 2015;49:560–566. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.01.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Grillo CA, Alvarez F, de Mele MAFL. Degradation of bioabsorbable Mg-based alloys: Assessment of the effects of insoluble corrosion products and joint effects of alloying components on mammalian cells. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater. 2016;58:372–380. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.08.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu Y, et al. Study on the Mg-Li-Zn ternary alloy system with improved mechanical properties, good degradation performance and different responses to cells. Acta Biomater. 2017;62:418–433. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rowan AN. Ending the Use of Animals in Toxicity Testing and RiskEvaluation. Camb Q Healthc Ethic. 2015;24:448–458. doi: 10.1017/S0963180115000109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fako VE, Furgeson DY. Zebrafish as a correlative and predictive model for assessing biomaterial nanotoxicity. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 2009;61:478–486. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang K, et al. Toxicity assessments of near-infrared upconversion luminescent LaF3:Yb,Er in early development of zebrafish embryos. Theranostics. 2013;3:258–266. doi: 10.7150/thno.5701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pyati UJ, Look AT, Hammerschmidt M. Zebrafish as a powerful vertebrate model system for in vivo studies of cell death. Semin Cancer Biol. 2007;17:154–165. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2006.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Flicek P, et al. Ensembl 2014. Nucleic acids research. 2014;42:D749–755. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.McGrath P, Li CQ. Zebrafish: a predictive model for assessing drug-induced toxicity. Drug discovery today. 2008;13:394–401. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rubinstein AL. Zebrafish assays for drug toxicity screening. Expert Opin Drug Met. 2006;2:231–240. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2.2.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li Y, et al. Zebrafish as a visual and dynamic model to study the transport of nanosized drug delivery systems across the biological barriers. Colloid Surface B. 2017;156:227–235. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee, K. Y. et al. Zebrafish models for functional and toxicological screening of nanoscale drug delivery systems: promoting preclinical applications. Bioscience reports37 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 29.Benjamin, D. C. & Hynes, R. O. Intravital imaging of metastasis in adult Zebrafish. Bmc Cancer17 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Chakraborty, C., Sharma, A. R., Sharma, G. & Lee, S. S. Zebrafish: A complete animal model to enumerate the nanoparticle toxicity. J Nanobiotechnol14 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 31.Berghmans S, et al. Making waves in cancer research: new models in the zebrafish. Biotechniques. 2005;39:227–237. doi: 10.2144/05392RV02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kim HK, et al. Comprehensive study on the roles of released ions from biodegradable Mg-5 wt% Ca-1 wt% Zn alloy in bone regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;11:2710–2724. doi: 10.1002/term.2166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhao N, Zhu D. Endothelial responses of magnesium and other alloying elements in magnesium-based stent materials. Metallomics. 2015;7:118–128. doi: 10.1039/C4MT00244J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mousa HM, et al. Amorphous apatite thin film formation on a biodegradable Mg alloy for bone regeneration: strategy, characterization, biodegradation, and in vitro cell study. Rsc Adv. 2016;6:22563–22574. doi: 10.1039/C5RA25306C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tie, D. et al. Antibacterial biodegradable Mg-Ag alloys. European cells & materials25, 284–298 discussion 298 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 36.Liu, C. et al. Biodegradable Mg-Cu alloys with enhanced osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and long-lasting antibacterial effects. Sci Rep-Uk6 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 37.He JH, Gao JM, Huang CJ, Li CQ. Zebrafish models for assessing developmental and reproductive toxicity. Neurotoxicology and teratology. 2014;42:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2014.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kanungo J, Cuevas E, Ali SF, Paule MG. Zebrafish model in drug safety assessment. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20:5416–5429. doi: 10.2174/1381612820666140205145658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Su YK, et al. Long-Term Hepatotoxicity of Yttrium-90 Radioembolization as Treatment of Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor to the Liver. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28:1520–1526. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Geyikoglu F, Turkez H, Bakir TO, Cicek M. The genotoxic, hepatotoxic, nephrotoxic, haematotoxic and histopathological effects in rats after aluminium chronic intoxication. Toxicology and industrial health. 2013;29:780–791. doi: 10.1177/0748233712440140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.