Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2018 Sep 13;6:e5583. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5583

Assessment of the bacterial community structure in shallow and deep sediments of the Perdido Fold Belt region in the Gulf of Mexico

Ma Fernanda Sánchez-Soto Jiménez 1, Daniel Cerqueda-García 2, Jorge L Montero-Muñoz 1, Ma Leopoldina Aguirre-Macedo 1,, José Q García-Maldonado 3,
Editor: Valeria Souza
PMCID: PMC6139248  PMID: 30225176

Abstract

The Mexican region of the Perdido Fold Belt (PFB), in northwestern Gulf of Mexico (GoM), is a geological province with important oil reservoirs that will be subjected to forthcoming oil exploration and extraction activities. To date, little is known about the native microbial communities of this region, and how these change relative to water depth. In this study we assessed the bacterial community structure of surficial sediments by high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene at 11 sites in the PFB, along a water column depth gradient from 20 to 3,700 m, including five shallow (20–600 m) and six deep (2,800–3,700 m) samples. The results indicated that OTUs richness and diversity were higher for shallow sites (OTUs = 2,888.2 ± 567.88; H′ = 9.6 ± 0.85) than for deep sites (OTUs = 1,884.7 ± 464.2; H′ = 7.74 ± 1.02). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination revealed that shallow microbial communities grouped separately from deep samples. Additionally, the shallow sites plotted further from each other on the NMDS whereas samples from the deeper sites (abyssal plains) plotted much more closely to each other. These differences were related to depth, redox potential, sulfur concentration, and grain size (lime and clay), based on the environmental variables fitted with the axis of the NMDS ordination. In addition, differential abundance analysis identified 147 OTUs with significant fold changes among the zones (107 from shallow and 40 from deep sites), which constituted 10 to 40% of the total relative abundances of the microbial communities. The most abundant OTUs with significant fold changes in shallow samples corresponded to Kordiimonadales, Rhodospirillales, Desulfobacterales (Desulfococcus), Syntrophobacterales and Nitrospirales (GOUTA 19, BD2-6, LCP-6), whilst Chromatiales, Oceanospirillales (Amphritea, Alcanivorax), Methylococcales, Flavobacteriales, Alteromonadales (Shewanella, ZD0117) and Rhodobacterales were the better represented taxa in deep samples. Several of the OTUs detected in both deep and shallow sites have been previously related to hydrocarbons consumption. Thus, this metabolism seems to be well represented in the studied sites, and it could abate future hydrocarbon contamination in this ecosystem. The results presented herein, along with biological and physicochemical data, constitute an available reference for further monitoring of the bacterial communities in this economically important region in the GoM.

Keywords: Bacterial diversity, Perdido Fold Belt, Gulf of Mexico, 16S rRNA

Introduction

Microorganisms are well recognized as key drivers of biogeochemical cycles in marine environments (Webster et al., 2003; Santos et al., 2011). Measuring the changes in microbial communities is of particular interest to understanding how environmental factors modulate their structure and how that, in turn, is related to the function and stability of the ecosystem (Huber et al., 2007; Jones et al., 2012; Fuhrman, Cram & Needham, 2015). In marine sediments, the type of substrate, energy and carbon sources, and the variables that are correlated with water depth (e.g., temperature, oxygen concentration, light penetration and hydrostatic pressure), generally describe the most important aspects of the variability amongst habitats (Miller & Wheeler, 2012).

In the Gulf of Mexico (GoM), changes in bacterial community structure have been mainly related with depth in the water column, and likely result from differences in temperature, dissolved oxygen and suspended particles (King et al., 2013) which occur across these depth differences. In marine sediments from the GoM, bacterial community composition has been determined at different depths below the seafloor (from sediment cores). It has been proposed that the bacterial community composition of these sediments likely results from the interaction between the water column and a benthic microbial population limited to the upper layer of the sediments (Reese et al., 2013). In contrast, the microbial diversity present in different sediment depths from seep systems in the GoM have been directly related to the composition and magnitude of hydrocarbon seepage (e.g., natural oils, methane, and non-methane hydrocarbons) (Orcutt et al., 2010), as well as to the presence of overlying microbial mats (Mills et al., 2004).

Knowledge about microbial communities in the GoM increased notably with the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) massive oil spill in 2010, which occurred in the north zone of the GoM across an enormous area with different environmental conditions (Kostka et al., 2011; Mason et al., 2012; Liu & Liu, 2013; Joye, Teske & Kostka, 2014). During the spill, it was observed that different bacterial phyla in the deep-water plume (e.g., Oceanospirillales, Cycloclasticus and Colwellia) rapidly responded and were enriched within hours - weeks following the DWH well blow out (Redmond & Valentine, 2011; Mason et al., 2012). In natural hydrocarbon seep sites sampled at the same time, several rare taxa increased rapidly in abundance after the spill, emphasizing the importance of specialized sub-populations and potential ecotypes during massive deep-sea oil discharges (Kleindienst et al., 2015). The oil transported to the shoreline after the discharge also had a profound impact on the abundance and community composition of indigenous bacteria in beach sands, where members of the Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria participated as key players in oil degradation (Kostka et al., 2011).

The precise volume of oil spilled and the trajectory of the oil slicks from the DHW are still controversial (Salcedo et al., 2017). Based on the surface circulation models of the waters of the GoM, it was inferred that the Mexican region of the Perdido Fold Belt (PFB), was also susceptible to this environmental disturbance (Soto & Vázquez-Botello, 2013). Knowledge of environmental and biotic data of this region is, however, scarce despite being a geologic province with oil reservoirs. The present study assessed changes in the bacterial community structure of surficial sediments with respect to a depth gradient and specific environmental variables in the PFB region, where oil exploration and extraction activities are predicted to impact environmental conditions, and consequently the structure of bacterial communities. Additionally, bacterial phylotypes putatively involved in hydrocarbon degradation were highlighted in this work.

Material and Methods

Sample collection and physicochemical variables from marine sediments

The samples used in this study were collected in the Northwestern Gulf of Mexico in April 2014. Sediment samples from a depth gradient (20–3,700 m), were collected perpendicular to the coastline at 11 sites on the parallels 25 and 25.15°N (Fig. 1, Table 1). Samples were collected with a Hessler-Sandia MK-II boxcore (40 × 40 cm) from which three different surficial (0–5 cm) subsamples were taken: (1) sterile 100 mL plastic containers immediately frozen at −20 °C on board for further molecular analysis; (2) a 2 inch core extracted to determine total sulfur concentration (TS) and redox potential on board, with a sulfide ion selective electrode and potentiometer (Bricker, 1982; Brassard, 1997); and (3) approximately 400 g of sediment stored in high density polyethylene bags at 4 °C until the determination of total organic matter (TOM), total organic carbon (TOC), and grain size in the laboratory. TOM was determined by the wet oxidation technique with an excess of dichromate and back titration with iron (II) (Buchanan, 1984), TOC content was quantified using the oxidation with potassium dichromate in acid medium, and titration of excess oxidant with ferrous sulfate and diphenylamine as an indicator (Buchanan, 1984). The amounts of sand, lime and clay were estimated using a hydrometer (Buchanan, 1984). These physicochemical variables were compared among shallow and deep sites using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA p < 0.05 and F-values) and were correlated with the depth variable.

Figure 1. Location of sampling sites in the Mexican Region of the Northwestern Gulf of Mexico.

Figure 1

Circles: shallow sites in the continental platform and slope from 20 to 600 m depth. Triangles: deep sites in the abyssal plain from 2,800 to 3,700 m depth. The names of the stations are indicated. Source credit: Abril Gamboa-Muñoz.

Table 1. Physicochemical variables from shallow and deep sediment samples.

Geographical location Physicochemical variables
Site Sample Longitude Latitude Depth (m) Redox ↑ (mV) TS ↑ (µM) TOM (%) TOC (µM) Sand (%) Lime ↑ (%) Clay ↓ (%)
Shallow E10 97°13′48″W 25°15′N 20 −131.0 0.05 0.80 0.45 34.5 51.2 14.4
E11 96°56′24″W 25°15′N 75 −174.4 0.05 1.10 0.61 26.5 57.3 16.3
E12 96°43′12″W 25°15′N 100 −204.0 0.05 1.02 0.56 20.5 51.2 28.4
E13 96°27′36″W 25°15′N 200 −131.7 0.05 0.83 0.46 22.5 51.2 26.4
E14 96°18′36″W 25°15′N 600 −192.9 0.05 1.02 0.56 23.7 68.2 8.1
Deep E121 95°30′W 25°00′N 2,800 230 0.10 1.22 0.68 33.75 60.3 6.0
E122 95°00′W 25°00′N 3,600 233 0.10 0.59 0.33 27.75 66.3 6.0
E123 94°00′W 25°00′N 3,700 225 0.11 0.44 0.25 25.7 66.3 8.0
E124 93°00′W 25°00′N 3,700 215 0.11 0.85 0.47 29.8 64.3 5.9
E125 92°00′W 25°00′N 3,500 236 0.12 0.81 0.45 23.9 70.3 5.9
E126 91°00′W 25°00′N 3,700 215 0.12 0.92 0.51 25.8 68.2 6.0

Notes.

TS, total sulfur; TOM, total organic matter and TOC, total organic carbon. Physicochemical variables measured with no replicates. Pearson coefficient showed significant correlation at a p-value <0.01 among TS (r2 = 0.98), redox potential (r2 = 0.98), and the percentages of lime (r2 = 0.78) and clay (r2 = −0.78) particles with depth.

↑ Variables with positive correlation with depth.

↓ Variables with negative correlation with depth.

DNA extraction

Sediment samples were stored during five months at −20 °C. Then, in October 2014 sediments were thawed at 4 °C, homogenized mechanically under sterile conditions, and centrifuged 1 min/10,000 ×g in order to separate the sediment from remaining water, which was discarded. Total DNA was extracted from 0.25 g of sediment using the PowerSoil®DNA Isolation Kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality of the DNA extractions was verified by agarose gel electrophoresis and the concentration was determined through UV absorption analysis with a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA). Extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C for further 16S rRNA Illumina sequencing and DGGE analysis (see a detailed description in Supplemental Information 1).

16S rRNA gene sequencing

Amplicons from environmental DNA were prepared for sequencing the 16S rRNA V3 and V4 variable regions by using a two PCR steps approach following the “16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation” protocol (Illumina). Briefly, the first PCR step amplified the template out of the DNA samples using the forward primer 5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′ and the reverse primer 5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAA TCC-3′ with Illumina overhang adapters attached, to obtain ∼550 bp fragments (Klindworth et al., 2013). The PCR program was performed in a thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems Veriti ABI Inc., Foster City, CA, USA) with an initial denaturation at 95 °C–3 min, 25 cycles of 95 °C–30 s, 55 °C–30 s, 72 °C–30 s and a final extension at 72 °C–5 min. Each PCR reaction (20 µl) included 2 µl of environmental DNA (5 ng/µl), 0.5 µl of each primer (10 µM) and 10 µl of 2× Phusion High-Fidelity MasterMix (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The correct size of the amplicons was verified on an QIAxcel Advanced system (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), DNA and the PCR clean-up were carried out using AMPure XP beads to discard free primers and primer dimer species. In the second PCR, eight cycles attached dual indices and the Illumina sequencing adapters using the Nextera XT Index Kit. PCR barcoded amplicons were verified and purified as previously described and quantified using a Qubit 3.0 fluorometer (Life Technology, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia). The individual barcoded amplicons were diluted on 10 mM Tris (pH 8.5) and pooled in equimolar concentrations (9 pM). Paired-end sequencing (2 × 300 bp) was carried out using the MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with a MiSeq Reagent Kit V3 (600 cycles). Sequencing was performed in the Aquatic Pathology laboratory at CINVESTAV-Mérida.

Data analysis

Demultiplexing of the pooled amplicons and trimming the barcode and adapter sequences was performed using the MiSeq Reporter Metagenomics Workflow (Illumina, 2014). Reads were overlapped with the fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies (FLASH) software (Magoč & Salzberg, 2011), and processed using the QIIME (version 1.9) (Caporaso et al., 2010) pipeline with the parameters q (phred_quality_treshold) = 20, r (max_bad_run_length,) = 3, p (min_per_read_length_fraction) = 0.75, for quality filtering. The demultiplexed sequences were clustered in operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with the ‘pick_open_reference_otus.py’ script at 97% of similarity using the usearch61 method (Edgar, 2010) with a minimum OTU cluster size of 5. Chimeric sequences were removed with the uchime2 algorithm in the reference mode (v 9.1.13) (Edgar, 2016) and, the taxonomic assignment was performed by the SortMeRna (Kopylova, Noé & Touzet, 2012) with an e-value of 3 e−6 and default parameters from QIIME, using the GreenGenes database (v13.8). An OTUs alignment was performed with the Mafft algorithm (Katoh & Standley, 2013) to build a phylogenetic tree using the Fasttree software (Price, Dehal & Arkin, 2009) for its subsequent use in the UniFrac (Lozupone, Hamady & Knight, 2006) distance analysis.

Community structure and composition analyses were performed by processing the OTU table in the R environment (R Core Team, 2014) with the Phyloseq (McMurdie & Holmes, 2013), vegan (Oksanen, 2013) and ggplot2 (Wickham, 2010) packages. The data set was rarefied at the depth from the smallest library (20,400). We reported the observed OTUs, the Shannon and Simpson diversity indexes (H′ and D, respectively) and the nonparametric richness from Chao1. The Good’s coverage was calculated to corroborate the adequate sampling depth.

In order to compare the microbial community composition among shallow and deep sampling sites, a non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) was plotted (Lozupone, Hamady & Knight, 2006; Giloteaux, Goñi Urriza & Duran, 2010) with the weighted UniFrac distance metric (Lozupone, Hamady & Knight, 2006) and a test of beta significance among groups of sample was performed using a two-sided Student’s two-sample t-test with the ‘make_distance_boxplots.py’ script of QIIME, p-values were calculated using 1,000 Monte Carlo permutations. The physicochemical variables were fitted with the envfit function to the NMDS ordination to correlate them with the community composition (p-value <0.05 and 10,000 permutations). Physicochemical variables were also tested with a PERMANOVA analysis at a p-value <0.05 (Table S1). A differential abundance analysis was performed with the DESeq2 (Love, Huber & Anders, 2014) R library to identify the OTUs that have significant fold changes among the shallow and deep zones. The p-value was corrected with the false discovery rate (FDR) method (Benjamini & Hochberg, 1995) and a Log2 fold change plot was made with the significant OTUs at a p-value <0.01.

All the sequences are available at SRA site from NCBI database in the BioProject PRJNA429278 and biosample accession ID’s SRR6457706 to SRR6457716 and the raw processed data in the supplementary material.

Results

Physicochemical properties from marine sediments

The physicochemical variables and textures of the sediment samples are shown in Table 1. Redox potential ranged from −204 to 236 mV. The electronegative values were found in samples from 20 to 600 m depth, while the electropositive values corresponded to the deep sediments (2,800–3,700 m). TS was constant at depths from 20 to 600 m at a concentration of 0.05 µM, while the maximum values were detected for deep sites (0.10–0.12 µM). The percentage of TOM and the concentration of TOC varied for all sites with averages of 0.872 ± 0.22% and 0.484 ± 0.123 µM, respectively. The percentages of sand, lime and clay in the sediment samples ranged from 20.50–34.5, 51.2–70.30 and 5.9–28.4%, respectively. Values of TS, redox potential, and the percentages of lime and clay showed significant correlations with depth (p-value <0.01) (Table 1).

Bacterial community structure in a depth gradient

The NMDS ordination method showed that microbial communities from shallow sites grouped separately from those from the deep sites (Fig. 2), and it was according with the test of significance were the mean of the distances of Shallow and Deep samples were different with a p-value <0.05. Samples taken from shallow sites displayed greater dissimilarity distance from each other, while those derived from the deep sites displayed a closer proximity to each other (Fig. 2). The environmental variables fitted on the NMDS ordination were: depth (r 2 = 0.79), redox potential (r2 = 0.77), the concentration of total sulfur (r2 = 0.73) and percentages of clay (r2 = 0.71) and lime (r2 = 0.7), at a p-value <0.05.

Figure 2. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) of the bacterial community structure and the environmental variables.

Figure 2

Ordination of samples based on the weighted UniFrac distance from the community structure and their relationship with the physicochemical variables. Shallow sites included samples collected from 20 to 600 m, and deep sites from 2,800 to 3,700 m depth. Physicochemical variables related to the bacterial community structure are shown in green arrows. TS total sulfur concentration. NMDS stress value = 0.0684.

The observed OTUs, Shannon (H′) and Simpson (D) diversity indexes, and the nonparametric richness estimation from Chao1, were different among shallow and deep-sea sites (p-value <0.05). These ecological estimators showed higher values in the sediment samples from shallow sites (observed OTUs = 2,888.2 ± 567.88, H′ = 9.6 ± 0.85, D = 0.99 ± 0.005 and Chao1 = 3,791.2 ± 737.81) than those obtained from the deep ocean floor (observed OTUs = 1,884.7 ± 464.2, H′ = 7.74 ± 1.02, D = 0.97 ± 0.02, and Chao1 = 2,806.18 ± 589.39) (Table 2).

Table 2. Alpha diversity estimations.

Alfa diversity data from observed OTUs, H′ Shannon diversity index, D Simpson diversity index, and Chao1 for nonparametric richness estimation. Statistical differences were observed among sampling sites Shallow and Deep-sea (p-value <0.05). Percentages of Good’s coverage shows the fraction of the OTUs subsampled more than once.

Ecological estimators
Site Sample Depth (m) Total counts Observed OTUs H D Chao1 Good’s coverage (%)
Shallow E10 20 48,886 2,401 9.3 0.99 3,002.2 96.51
E11 75 30,290 3,262 10.1 1.00 4,141.4 94.83
E12 100 21,243 3,509 10.4 1.00 4,770.5 93.94
E13 200 35,253 3,081 9.8 1.00 3,925.3 95.09
E14 600 42,131 2,188 8.2 0.99 3,116.4 95.8
Deep E121 2,800 53,408 2,238 8.7 0.99 3,087.3 95.75
E125 3,600 56,735 1,434 7.0 0.97 2,059.0 97.36
E122 3,700 20,402 1,243 6.7 0.97 2081.6 97.23
E123 3,700 61,025 2,139 8.0 0.97 3,181.1 95.54
E124 3,500 42,768 1,848 6.9 0.94 3,009.7 95.80
E126 3,700 45,107 2,406 9.11 0.99 3,418.39 95.40

Notes.

Alfa diversity data from observed OTUs, H′ Shannon diversity index, D Simpson diversity index, and Chao1for nonparametric richness estimation. Statistical differences were observed among sampling sites Shallow and Deep-sea (p-value <0.05). Percentages of Good’s coverage shows the fraction of the OTUs subsampled more than once.

Bacterial community composition

Microbial community analysis resulted in the detection of 25 bacterial phyla, however only 14 were ≥1% in relative abundance (Table S2). Proteobacteria, represented by Gamma-, Alpha- and Deltaproteobacteria classes, were dominant in all the analyzed samples (Fig. 3). Nevertheless, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, Nitrospirae, Planctomycetes, Gemmatimonadetes and the NC10 phyla were also well represented in the samples. Two archaeal phyla, corresponding to the Euryarchaeota (Thermoplasmata class) and CreNarchaeota including Miscellaneous CreNarchaeota Group (MCG) and ThauMarchaeota classes (based on the GreenGene database), were also detected in low abundances (0.3 to 1.2%) (Fig. 3). At lower taxonomic levels, 51 families were detected, from which Piscirickettsiaceae, Rhodobacteraceae, Flavobacteriaceae, Syntrophobacteraceae, Thermovibrionaceae, Desulfobacteraceae, Colwelliaceae, Marinicellaceae, Alcanivoracaceae, Colwelliaceae, and CeNarchaeaceae were among the families with higher relative abundances in the samples (Fig. S1A). Moreover, 23 genera were identified at >1% of relative abundances (Fig. S4). Desulfococcus, Alcanivorax, Fulvivirga, Amphritea, BD2-6, Shewanella, ZD0117 and Nitrospina were the better represented in the samples (Fig. S4).

Figure 3. Relative abundances from bacteria inhabiting sediments in the Mexican Region in the northwestern GM.

Figure 3

Taxonomic diversity at phylum and class levels from shallow and deep samples. Shallow sediment samples retrieved from 20 to 600 m depth, and deep sediment samples retrieved from 2,800 to 3,700 m depth. Only the 20 most abundant classes are shown. The remaining classes were agglomerated in the “Others” category.

Differential abundance analysis identified 147 OTUs with significant fold changes between the deep and shallow zones, 107 from shallow and 40 from deep sites (Fig. 4A). From the shallow samples, most of these OTUs belonged to Delta-, Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria (38, 24 and 18, respectively), while the rest of the OTUs were distributed in 13 classes of 10 phyla (Fig.  4A). In deep samples, all of the 40 OTUs belonged to Gamma-, Alphaproteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Nitrospirae (27, six, six and one, respectively) (Fig. 4A). The relative abundances of the 147 OTUs with significant fold changes constituted approximately 10 to 40% of the total microbial communities (Fig. 4B). Kordiimonadales, Rhodospirillales, Desulfobacterales, Syntrophobacterales and Nitrospirales, were the orders with highest relative abundances for shallow samples whilst the orders Chromatiales, Oceanospirillales, Methylococcales, Flavobacteriales and Rhodobacterales were the best represented orders for deep samples (Fig. 4B). At the genus taxonomic level, differential abundance analysis allowed to identify Marinicella, Alcanivorax, Shewanella and ZD0117 with significant fold changes for deep samples; and Nitrosopumilus, GOUTA19, LCP-6, BD2-6, Amphritea, Desulfococcus and Mariprofundus for shallow sites (Fig. S5).

Figure 4. Differential OTUs abundance among shallow and deep communities from sediment samples in the Mexican northwestern Gulf of Mexico.

Figure 4

(A) OTUs with significant fold changes among the community composition from shallow and deep zones. Circles in colors defines the phyla of the OTUs. (B) Relative abundances of the OTUs with significant fold changes at a class-order taxonomic level.

Discussion

Physicochemical properties of sediment samples

Physicochemical properties (e.g., temperature, pH, redox) in marine sediments commonly change according to water depth (Miller & Wheeler, 2012). In this study, lime percentage, redox potential and total sulfur were positively correlated to depth, while the clay particles percentages were negatively correlated with depth (Table 1). The electronegative redox values measured in the first 5 cm of the sediments in all shallow sites (Table 1), suggested that oxygen was depleted by microbial respiration as common reported for this layer in shallow marine sediments (Aranda et al., 2015). Electronegative redox values in the shallow samples were likely enhanced at higher fine-grained clay content, since this diminishes the sediment permeability as reported elsewhere for sediments in the continental platform (Probandt et al., 2017). In contrast, the electropositive redox values detected in the first 5 cm of the sediments in all the deep sites (Table 1) suggested oxidizing conditions. This condition has also been observed at different latitudes in the GoM (Deming & Carpenter, 2008) due to both the circulation of deep water masses carrying oxygen (Jochens & DiMarco, 2008), and low rates of oxygen consumption (Rowe et al., 2008).

Total organic matter percentage (TOM%) was determined to be below 2% for all the sediments analyzed (Table 1). These low organic contents are similar to those reported in studies of two onshore-offshore transects in the Northwestern GoM (Goñi, Ruttenberg & Eglinton, 1998). Shallow sites likely receive inputs from terrestrial organic matter (Balsam & Beeson, 2003), and yet these sediments presented similar values of TOM than those detected for deep sites (Table 1). Previous studies have reported high production and consumption rates of oxygen measured for shallow sediments in Northeastern GoM (Mills et al., 2008). TOM values determined in this study for shallow sites are in concordance with previous reports for the GoM (Balsam & Beeson, 2003). We hypothesize that these values are related to the consequence of high rates of microbial metabolism in those same zones.

Microbial ecology assessment

The effect of storage temperature on microbial community structure has been previously studied, and it is well recognized that microbial metabolism could keep on going at −20 °C; however, the survival at these subzero temperatures requires several genetic and physiological strategies that exclusively cold-adapted microorganisms (permafrost and seasonally frozen soil microbial communities) have developed (Jansson & Tas, 2014; Boetius et al., 2015). In the present study, microbial communities from marine sediments living at temperatures ranging from 4 to 27 °C were analyzed. Thus, we considered that changes in the microbial community composition due to the storage temperature (−20 °C) were unlikely, because the sediments were immediately frozen at −20 °C on board and they were never thawed during the transport neither in the laboratory before DNA extraction, ashas been recommended in previous studies (Tedjo et al., 2015). The storage of the samples at −20 °C is a standard procedure commonly used for microbial community analyses from marine sediment (e.g., Bienhold et al., 2016; Probandt et al., 2017).

Diversity indices are commonly used in microbial ecology studies to understand the links between the environmental conditions and the community (Kimes et al., 2013; Bargiela et al., 2015). It has been suggested that microbial richness and diversity could be an expression of environmental variation correlated to energy sources and temperature (Santelli et al., 2008; Rosano-Hernández, Ramírez-Saad & Fernández-Linares, 2012; Bargiela et al., 2015). Our results revealed higher richness and diversity in shallow sites compared to deep sites (Table 2). This can be a result of more dynamic shallow environments, characterized by strong physical mixing and seasonal variation. In shallow environments the interaction among atmosphere, land and ocean increase environmental variation, and therefore higher microbial diversity, as reported for coastal environments elsewhere (Gobet et al., 2012). In contrast, lower richness and diversity in the deep sites could be the result of relatively constant environmental conditions. Microbes from the abyssal plains environment are able to overcome the extreme conditions of temperature, pressure, oligotrophy and darkness (Jochens & DiMarco, 2008) but are subjected to far less environmental variability.

It is well recognized that marine sediments are dynamic environments shaped by interactions among biotic and abiotic processes, including the redox reactions (Wasmund, Mußmann & Loy, 2017). In the present study, the electronegative redox values detected in the first 5 cm of the sediments for shallow sites (Table 1), suggested high microbial respiration or anoxic/reducing conditions (Valdes & Real, 2004; Aranda et al., 2015). However, genera known to be both aerobic (e.g., Marinicella and Nitrosopumilus) and anaerobic (e.g., Amphritea, Desulfococcus, GOUTA-19, LCP-6, and Pseudidiomarina) were found in shallow samples (Fig. S4). This suggested the co-occurrence of different metabolisms in these sites, in accordance with previous reports for other shallow marine sediments (Jørgensen, 1977; Mills et al., 2008; Acosta-González, Rosselló-Móra & Marqués, 2013; Tolar, King & Hollibaugh, 2013; Cerqueira et al., 2015).

Electropositive redox values detected in the deep sites (Table 1), suggested oxidizing conditions at those water depths, likely because the upper sediment layers remain oxygenated due to relatively high oxygen concentrations in deep waters of the GoM (Jochens & DiMarco, 2008) as well as low rates of sediment community oxygen consumption previously reported in the deep GoM (Rowe et al., 2008). In these oxidizing deep sediments, genera known to be aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria, such as Shewanella, Alcanivorax, Marinicella, Nitrospina and ZD0117 (Alteromonadacea e) were well represented (Fig. S4). Thus, these results suggest that aerobic (and facultatively anaerobic) lifestyles seem to be favored in abyssal sediments of the studied region.

In this study, water depth was highly correlated with microbial community structure (Fig. 2). It is known that water depth and its dependent variables, such as temperature and pressure, are among the most important factors explaining variation in the bacterial community composition of seafloor sediments (Orcutt et al., 2010; Bienhold et al., 2016). As an example of this, our results showed a relatively high abundance of psychropiezophilicorganisms of the genera Colwellia and Shewanella for the deep sites (Fig. S2 and Fig. S4), where conditions are favorable for the development of these microbial metabolisms (Nogi et al., 2004).

Detection of phylotypes putatively related to hydrocarbons degradation

Due to the presence of natural hydrocarbon effluents and the oil spills which have occurred in the GoM (e.g., DWH spill), the potential effects of hydrocarbons on microbial community structure has been extensively studied there (Rosano-Hernández, Ramírez-Saad & Fernández-Linares, 2012; Orcutt et al., 2010; Kleindienst et al., 2015). Recent investigations have provided insights about microbial populations responding to the presence of hydrocarbons, highlighting microorganisms capable of using these organic compounds as carbon source (Kostka et al., 2011; Redmond & Valentine, 2011; Mason et al., 2012). In this work, we report the occurrence of several genera, such as Shewanella, Alcanivorax, Pseudoalteromonas and Phaeobacter (Fig. S4), which have been previously associated with hydrocarbon consumption (Beazley et al., 2012; Mason et al., 2014; Barbato et al., 2016; Liu, Bacosa & Liu, 2017).

In addition, this work reports for the first time NC10 and Kordiimonadales phylotypes for sediments of the GoM (Fig. 3 and Fig. S1), that based on the available information, are capable of anaerobic methane oxidation with nitrite denitrification, and aerobic degradation of alkanes and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, respectively (Kwon et al., 2005; Xu et al., 2011; Math et al., 2012; Zhou & Xing, 2015; Padilla et al., 2016). The Kordiimonadales phylotype was even detected by DGGE band sequencing approach (Fig. S2B), supporting their relatively high abundances in the analyzed samples.

The potential capability to degrade aromatic compounds, such as nitrotoluene, ethylbenzene, chlorocyclohexane and fluorobenzoate were predicted based on trait modeling software (PICRUSt) (Fig. S3). This also suggests that microbial metabolisms related to the hydrocarbon degradation might be well distributed in the Mexican region of the PFB and could contribute with the bioremediation in case of hydrocarbon contamination due to forthcoming oil exploration and extraction activities in this area.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first study to report differences in abundances and composition of the microbial communities inhabiting surficial sediments in a water depth gradient in an important province for oil extraction in the Mexican region of the Gulf of Mexico. In this study, the combination of nucleic acid–based molecular methods and physicochemical measurements allowed the detection of changes in the structures of microbial communities which were mainly related to the redox potential, total sulfur concentration, grain size, as well as depth and the variables that change with it, such as temperature and pressure. Our findings indicate that shallow microbial communities are taxonomically richer than communities in the deep sediments. Bacterial phylotypes putatively related to hydrocarbon degradation appear to be well represented for all the analyzed samples and could ameliorate future anthropogenic oil spills in this region of the GoM. These results contribute to the current knowledge of the environmental and biological dataset of the Perdido Fold Belt, which will be useful for further monitoring of this area in the Gulf of Mexico.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. Supplementary methods.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Supplementary methods file.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-2
Figure S1. Relative abundances of microbial communities at taxonomic levels of Family (A) and Order (B).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-3
Figure S2. DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic analysis of sequenced bands.

(A) DGGE band pattern from bacterial communities through the depth gradient based on the V3 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene. Triangles indicate sequenced bands. The names of the stations are indicated in the bottom. (B) Phylogenetic tree of sequenced DGGE bands (∼200 pb, in bold) and GenBank sequences (accession numbers in parenthesis). Unrooted phylogenetic tree showing representative taxa inferred by Neighbor-Joining method. The percentage of replicates tree in which the associated taxa cluster together in the bootstrap test (1,000 replicates) are shown next to the branches ( >75). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Jukes-Cantor method, and the bar indicates an evolutionary distance of 0.05 substitutions for each nucleotide compared.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-4
Figure S3. Metabolic activities predicted from shallow and deep microbial communities.

Differences in the proportions of metabolic pathways among shallow and deep-sea sediment samples were observed based on the metagenomic simulation using PICRUST software and the KEGG database. 95% confidence intervals are shown.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-5
Figure S4. Relative abundances of microbial communities at genus taxonomic level.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-6
Figure S5. Differential OTUs abundance at genus taxonomic level among shallow and deep communities.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-7
Table S1. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) results for the identification of physicochemical variables correlated with the microbial community structure (p-value <0.05).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-8
Table S2. OTUs table and assigned taxonomy.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-9
Table S3. Weighted nearest sequenced taxon index (NSTI) values obtained from PICRUST analysis.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-10
Table S4. Number of reads that passed >Q20 per sample. The total reads passed quality filter in this study were 457,248.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-11
Table S5. Pearson correlation coefficients among environmental variables: depth (m), total sulfur (TS, uM), redox (mV), total organic matter (TOM, %), total organic carbon (TOC, uM), sand (%), lime (%) and clay (%).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-12
Supplemental Information 3. Metadata.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-13
Supplemental Information 4. OTU tree.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-14
Supplemental Information 5. Predicted pathways.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-15

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to David Valdes and Silvia Guadalupe Granados for providing the physicochemical data; and to Abril Gamboa-Muñoz for the preparation of Fig. 1. Gregory Arjona and Francisco Puc were responsible of the sampling during the oceanographic campaign. We are very appreciative of many helpful discussions with Santiago Cadena and Alejandra Escobar-Zepeda. The computational resources used for bioinformatics analyses at CINVESTAV-Mérida were provided by Emanuel Hernández-Núñez.

Funding Statement

This research was provided by “Biotechnology of marine organisms” awarded by the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT) project 15689 - 2014 and by the Marine Resources Department at CINVESTAV Merida. CONACYT awarded Ma. Fernanda Sánchez-Soto Jiménez with Master and PhD Scholarships. The necessary infrastructure to complete this investigation came from CONACYT –Mexican Ministry of Energy –Hydrocarbon Trust, project 201441; and from CONACYT 251622 - 2015 received by José Q. García-Maldonado. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Ma. Leopoldina Aguirre-Macedo, Email: leopoldina.aguirre@cinvestav.mx, leopoldina2305@gmail.com.

José Q. García-Maldonado, Email: jose.garcia@cinvestav.mx.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

Samples were collected during “Campaña Oceanográfica y Manifestación Ambiental Modalidad Regional del Golfo de México Aguas Someras, Profundas y Ultra Profundas Región Norte, 2014” founded by PEMEX-PEP.

Author Contributions

Ma. Fernanda Sánchez-Soto Jiménez conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Daniel Cerqueda-García and Jorge L. Montero-Muñoz analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Ma. Leopoldina Aguirre-Macedo conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

José Q. García-Maldonado conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

All the sequences are available at SRA site from NCBI database in the BioProject PRJNA429278 and biosample accession ID’s SRR6457706 to SRR6457716.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are provided in the Supplemental File.

References

  • Acosta-González, Rosselló-Móra & Marqués (2013).Acosta-González A, Rosselló-Móra R, Marqués S. Characterization of the anaerobic microbial community in oil-polluted subtidal sediments: aromatic biodegradation potential after the Prestige oil spill. Environmental Microbiology. 2013;15:77–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02782.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Aranda et al. (2015).Aranda CP, Valenzuela C, Matamala Y, Godoy FA, Aranda N. Sulphur-cycling bacteria and ciliated protozoans in a Beggiatoaceae mat covering organically enriched sediments beneath a salmon farm in a southern Chilean fjord. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2015;100:270–278. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.08.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Balsam & Beeson (2003).Balsam WL, Beeson JP. Sea-floor sediment distribution in the Gulf of Mexico. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers. 2003;50(12):1421–1444. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2003.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Barbato et al. (2016).Barbato M, Scoma A, Mapelli F, De Smet R, Banat IM, Daffonchio D, Boon N, Borin S. Hydrocarbonoclastic alcanivorax isolates exhibit different physiological and expression responses to n-dodecane. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7:1–14. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bargiela et al. (2015).Bargiela R, Mapelli F, Rojo D, Chouaia B, Tornés J, Borin S, Richter M, Del Pozo MV, Cappello S, Gertler C, Genovese M, Denaro R, Martínez-Martínez M, Fodelianakis S, Amer RA, Bigazzi D, Han X, Chen J, Chernikova TN, Golyshina OV, Mahjoubi M, Jaouanil A, Benzha F, Magagnini M, Hussein E, Al-Horani F, Cherif A, Blaghen M, Abdel-Fattah YR, Kalogerakis N, Barbas C, Malkawi HI, Golyshin PN, Yakimov MM, Daffonchio D, Ferrer M. Bacterial population and biodegradation potential in chronically crude oil-contaminated marine sediments are strongly linked to temperature. Scientific Reports. 2015;5:11651. doi: 10.1038/srep11651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Beazley et al. (2012).Beazley MJ, Martinez RJ, Rajan S, Powell J, Piceno YM, Lauren MT, Andersen GL, Hazen TC, VanNostrand JD, Zhou J, Mortazavi B, Sobecky PA. Microbial Community analysis of a coastal salt marsh affected by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e41305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Benjamini & Hochberg (1995).Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 1995;57:289–300. [Google Scholar]
  • Bienhold et al. (2016).Bienhold C, Zinger L, Boetius A, Ramette A. Diversity and biogeography of bathyal and abyssal seafloor bacteria. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0148016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Boetius et al. (2015).Boetius A, Anesio AM, Deming JW, Mikucki JA, Rapp JZ. Microbial ecology of the cryosphere: Sea ice and glacial habitats. Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 2015;13:677–690. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brassard (1997).Brassard P. Measurement of Eh and pH in aquatic sediments. In: Mudroch A, Azcue JM, Mudroch P, editors. Manual of physicochemical analysis of aquatic sediments. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Inc. Lewis Publishers; 1997. pp. 47–69. [Google Scholar]
  • Bricker (1982).Bricker OP. Redox potential: its measurement and importance in water systems. In: Minear RA, Keith LH, editors. Water analysis, vol 1, inorganic species. Academic Press Inc.; Florida: 1982. pp. 55–79. [Google Scholar]
  • Buchanan (1984).Buchanan JB. Sediment analysis. In: Holme NA, Mcintyre AD, editors. Methods for the study of marine benthos, vol. 3. Second Edition Blackwell Scientific Publications; Oxford: 1984. pp. 41–65. [Google Scholar]
  • Caporaso et al. (2010).Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Noah F, Gonzalez Peña A, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley AT, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, YatSunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature Methods. 2010;7(5):335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cerqueira et al. (2015).Cerqueira T, Pinho D, Egas C, Froufe H, Altermark B, Candeias C, Santos RS, Bettencourt R. Microbial diversity in deep-sea sediments from the Menez Gwen hydrothermal vent system of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Marine Genomics. 2015;24:343–355. doi: 10.1016/j.margen.2015.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Deming & Carpenter (2008).Deming JW, Carpenter SD. Factors influencing benthic bacterial abundance, biomass, and activity on the northern continental margin and deep basin of the Gulf of Mexico. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 2008;55:2597–2606. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.07.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Edgar (2010).Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2460–2461. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Edgar (2016).Edgar RC. UCHIME2: improved chimera prediction for amplicon sequencing. bioRxiv. 2016 doi: 10.1101/074252. [DOI]
  • Fuhrman, Cram & Needham (2015).Fuhrman JA, Cram JA, Needham DM. Marine microbial community dynamics and their ecological interpretation. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2015;13:133–146. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Giloteaux, Goñi Urriza & Duran (2010).Giloteaux L, Goñi Urriza M, Duran R. Nested PCR and new primers for analysis of sulfate-reducing bacteria in low-cell-biomass environments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2010;76:2856–2865. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02023-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gobet et al. (2012).Gobet A, Böer SI, Huse SM, van Beusekom JEE, Quince C, Sogin ML, Boetius A, Ramette A. Diversity and dynamics of rare and of resident bacterial populations in coastal sands. ISME Journal. 2012;6:542–553. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huber et al. (2007).Huber JA, Welch DBM, Morrison HG, Huse SM, Neal PR, Butterfield DA, Sogin ML. Microbial population structures in the Deep Marine Biosphere. Science. 2007;318:97–101. doi: 10.1126/science.1146689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Goñi, Ruttenberg & Eglinton (1998).Goñi MA, Ruttenberg KC, Eglinton TI. A reassessment of the sources and importance of land-derived organic matter in surface sediments from the Gulf of Mexico. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1998;62:3055–3075. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00217-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Illumina (2014).Illumina . MiSeq reporter metagenomics workflow reference guide. San Diego: ILLUMINA; 2014. 5 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Jansson & Tas (2014).Jansson JK, Tas N. The microbial ecology of permafrost. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2014;12:414–425. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jochens & DiMarco (2008).Jochens AE, DiMarco SF. Physical oceanographic conditions in the deep-water Gulf of Mexico in summer 2000–2002. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 2008;55:2541–2554. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Jones et al. (2012).Jones SE, Cadkin TA, Newton RJ, McMahon KD. Spatial and temporal scales of aquatic bacterial beta diversity. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2012;3:1–10. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jørgensen (1977).Jørgensen BB. Bacterial sulfate reduction within reduced microniches of oxidized marine Sediments. Marine Biology. 1977;17:7–17. [Google Scholar]
  • Joye, Teske & Kostka (2014).Joye SB, Teske AP, Kostka JE. Microbial dynamics following the Macondo oil well blowout across Gulf of Mexico environments. Bioscience. 2014;64:766–777. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biu121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Katoh & Standley (2013).Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2013;30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kimes et al. (2013).Kimes NE, Callaghan AV, Aktas DFL, Smith WL, Sunner J, Golding BT, Drozdowska M, Hazen TC, Suflita JM, Morris PJ. Metagenomic analysis and metabolite profiling of deep-sea sediments from the Gulf of Mexico following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2013;4:1–17. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • King et al. (2013).King GM, Smith CB, Tolar B, Hollibaugh JT. Analysis of composition and structure of coastal to mesopelagic bacterioplankton communities in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2013;3:438. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kleindienst et al. (2015).Kleindienst S, Grim S, Sogin M, Bracco A, Crespo-Medina M, Joye SB. Diverse, rare microbial taxa responded to the Deepwater Horizon deep-sea hydrocarbon plume. ISME Journal. 2015;10(2):400–415. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Klindworth et al. (2013).Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glöcker FO. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;41(1):e1. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kopylova, Noé & Touzet (2012).Kopylova E, Noé L, Touzet H. SortMeRNA: fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3211–3217. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kostka et al. (2011).Kostka JE, Prakash O, Overholt WA, Green SJ, Freyer G, Canion A, Delgardio J, Norton N, Hazen TC, Huettel M. Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria and the bacterial community response in Gulf of Mexico beach sands impacted by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2011;77:7962–7974. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05402-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kwon et al. (2005).Kwon KK, Lee H-S, Yang SH, Kim S-J. Kordiimonas gwangyangensis gen. nov. sp. nov. a marine bacterium isolated from marine sediments that forms a distinct phyletic lineage (Kordiimonadales ord. nov.) in the Alphaproteobacteria. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2005;55:2033–2037. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63684-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu, Bacosa & Liu (2017).Liu J, Bacosa HP, Liu Z. Potential environmental factors affecting oil-degrading bacterial populations in deep and surface waters of the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;7:2131. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu & Liu (2013).Liu Z, Liu J. Evaluating bacterial community structures in oil collected from the sea surface and sediment in the northern Gulf of Mexico after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. MicrobiologyOpen. 2013;2:492–504. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Love, Huber & Anders (2014).Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology. 2014;15(12):550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lozupone, Hamady & Knight (2006).Lozupone C, Hamady M, Knight R. UniFrac-an online tool for comparing microbial community diversity in a phylogenetic context. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:371. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Magoč & Salzberg (2011).Magoč T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of long reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2957–2963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mason et al. (2014).Mason OU, Han J, Woyke T, Jansson JK. Single-cell genomics reveals features of a Colwellia species that was dominant during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2014;5:332. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mason et al. (2012).Mason OU, Hazen TC, Borglin S, Chain PSG, Dubinsky EA, Fortney JL, Han J, Holman H-YN, Hultman J, Tringe SG, Woyke T, Zhou J, Rubin, Jansson JKEM. Metagenome, metatranscriptome and single-cell sequencing reveal microbial response to Deepwater Horizon oil spill. ISME Journal. 2012;6:1715–27. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Math et al. (2012).Math RK, Jeong SH, Jin HM, Park MS, Kim JM, Jeon CO. Kordiimonasaestuarii sp. nov. a marine bacterium isolated from a tidal flat. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2012;62:3049–3054. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.038943-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McMurdie & Holmes (2013).McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(4):e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Miller & Wheeler (2012).Miller CB, Wheeler PA. The fauna in deep-sea sediments. In: Miller CB, Wheeler PA, editors. Biological oceanography. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. pp. 292–320. [Google Scholar]
  • Mills et al. (2008).Mills HJ, Hunter E, Humphrys M, Kerkhof L, McGuinness L, Huettel M, Kostka JE. Characterization of nitrifying, denitrifying, and overall bacterial communities in permeable marine sediments of the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2008;74:4440–4453. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02692-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mills et al. (2004).Mills HJ, Martinez RJ, Story S, Sobecky PA. Identification of members of the metabolically active microbial populations associated with Beggiatoa species mat communities from Gulf of Mexico cold-seep sediments. Society. 2004;70:5447–5458. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.9.5447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nogi et al. (2004).Nogi Y, Hosoya S, Kato C, Horikoshi K. Colwelliapiezophila sp. nov. a novel piezophilic species from deep-sea sediments of the Japan Trench. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2004;54:1627–1631. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.03049-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oksanen (2013).Oksanen J. Multivariate analysis of ecological communities in R: vegan tutorial. http://cc.oulu.fi/ jarioksa/opetus/metodi/vegantutor.pdf 2013
  • Orcutt et al. (2010).Orcutt BN, Joye SB, Kleindienst S, Knittel K, Ramette A, Reitz A, Samarkin V, Treude T, Boetius A. Impact of natural oil and higher hydrocarbons on microbial diversity, distribution, and activity in Gulf of Mexico cold-seep sediments. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 2010;57:2008–2021. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.05.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Padilla et al. (2016).Padilla CC, Bristow LA, Sarode N, Garcia-Robledo E, Gómez E, Benson CR, Bourbonnais A, Altabet MA, Girguis PR, Thamdrup B, Stewart FJ. NC10 bacteria in marine oxygen minimum zones. ISME Journal. 2016;10:2067–2071. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Price, Dehal & Arkin (2009).Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. Fasttree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2009;26:1641–1650. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Probandt et al. (2017).Probandt D, Knittel K, Tegetmeyer HE, Ahmerkamp S, Holtappels, Amann R. Permeability shapes bacterial communities in sublittoral surface sediments. Environmental Microbiology. 2017;19:1584–1599. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team (2014).R Core Team . R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna: 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • Redmond & Valentine (2011).Redmond MC, Valentine DL. Natural gas and temperature structured a microbial community response to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;109:20292–20297. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108756108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Reese et al. (2013).Reese BK, Mills HJ, Dowd SE, Morsee JW. Linking molecular microbial ecology to geochemistry in a coastal hypoxic zone. Geomicrobiology Journal. 2013;0451:160–172. doi: 10.1080/01490451.2012.659331. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosano-Hernández, Ramírez-Saad & Fernández-Linares (2012).Rosano-Hernández MC, Ramírez-Saad H, Fernández-Linares L. Petroleum influenced beach sediments of the Campeche Bank, Mexico: diversity and bacterial community structure assessment. Journal of Environmental Management. 2012;95:S325–S331. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rowe et al. (2008).Rowe GT, Morse J, Nunnally C, Boland GS. Sediment community oxygen consumption in the deep Gulf of Mexico. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 2008;55:2686–2691. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.07.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Salcedo et al. (2017).Salcedo DL, Soto LA, Estradas-Romero A, Botello AV. Interannual variability of soft-bottom macrobenthic communities of the NW Gulf of Mexico in relationship to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2017;114:987–994. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Santelli et al. (2008).Santelli CM, Orcutt BN, Banning E, Bach W, Moyer CL, Sogin ML, Staudigel H, Edwards KJ. Abundance and diversity of microbial life in ocean crust. Nature. 2008;453:653–656. doi: 10.1038/nature06899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Santos et al. (2011).Santos HF, Carmo FL, Paes JES, Rosado AS, Peixoto RS. Bioremediation of mangroves impacted by Petroleum. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 2011;216:329–350. doi: 10.1007/s11270-010-0536-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Soto & Vázquez-Botello (2013).Soto LA, Vázquez-Botello A. Legal issues and scientific constraints in the environmental assessment of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in Mexico Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in the Gulf of Mexico. International Journal of Geosciences. 2013;4:39–45. doi: 10.4236/ijg.2013.45B007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Tedjo et al. (2015).Tedjo DI, Jonkers DMAE, Savelkoul PH, Masclee AA, van Best N, Pierik MJ, Penders J. The effect of sampling and storage on the fecal microbiota composition in healthy and diseased subjects. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(5):e0126685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tolar, King & Hollibaugh (2013).Tolar BB, King GM, Hollibaugh JT. An analysis of ThauMarchaeota populations from the northern Gulf of Mexico. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2013;4:72. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Valdes & Real (2004).Valdes DS, Real E. Nitrogen and phosphorus in water and sediments at Ria Lagartos coastal lagoon, Yucatan, Gulf of Mexico. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences. 2004;33:338–345. [Google Scholar]
  • Wasmund, Mußmann & Loy (2017).Wasmund K, Mußmann M, Loy A. The life sulfuric: microbial ecology of sulfur cycling in marine sediments. Environmental Microbiology Reports. 2017;9:323–344. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Webster et al. (2003).Webster G, Newberry CJ, Fry JC, Weightman AJ. Assessment of bacterial community structure in the deep sub-seafloor biosphere by 16S rDNA-based techniques: a cautionary tale. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2003;55:155–164. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00140-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wickham (2010).Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Journal of Statistical Software. 2010;35:1–3. doi: 10.18637/jss.v035.b01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu et al. (2011).Xu X-W, Huo Y-Y, Bai X-D, Bai X-D, Wang C-S, Oren A, Li A-Y, Wu M. Kordiimonaslacus sp. nov. isolated from a ballast water tank, and emended description of the genus Kordiimonas. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2011;61:422–426. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.018200-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhou & Xing (2015).Zhou J, Xing J. Effect of electron donors on the performance of haloalkaliphilic sulfate-reducing bioreactors for flue gas treatment and microbial degradation patterns related to sulfate reduction of different electron donors. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2015;96:14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2014.12.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. Supplementary methods.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Supplementary methods file.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-2
Figure S1. Relative abundances of microbial communities at taxonomic levels of Family (A) and Order (B).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-3
Figure S2. DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic analysis of sequenced bands.

(A) DGGE band pattern from bacterial communities through the depth gradient based on the V3 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene. Triangles indicate sequenced bands. The names of the stations are indicated in the bottom. (B) Phylogenetic tree of sequenced DGGE bands (∼200 pb, in bold) and GenBank sequences (accession numbers in parenthesis). Unrooted phylogenetic tree showing representative taxa inferred by Neighbor-Joining method. The percentage of replicates tree in which the associated taxa cluster together in the bootstrap test (1,000 replicates) are shown next to the branches ( >75). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Jukes-Cantor method, and the bar indicates an evolutionary distance of 0.05 substitutions for each nucleotide compared.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-4
Figure S3. Metabolic activities predicted from shallow and deep microbial communities.

Differences in the proportions of metabolic pathways among shallow and deep-sea sediment samples were observed based on the metagenomic simulation using PICRUST software and the KEGG database. 95% confidence intervals are shown.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-5
Figure S4. Relative abundances of microbial communities at genus taxonomic level.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-6
Figure S5. Differential OTUs abundance at genus taxonomic level among shallow and deep communities.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-7
Table S1. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) results for the identification of physicochemical variables correlated with the microbial community structure (p-value <0.05).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-8
Table S2. OTUs table and assigned taxonomy.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-9
Table S3. Weighted nearest sequenced taxon index (NSTI) values obtained from PICRUST analysis.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-10
Table S4. Number of reads that passed >Q20 per sample. The total reads passed quality filter in this study were 457,248.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-11
Table S5. Pearson correlation coefficients among environmental variables: depth (m), total sulfur (TS, uM), redox (mV), total organic matter (TOM, %), total organic carbon (TOC, uM), sand (%), lime (%) and clay (%).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-12
Supplemental Information 3. Metadata.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-13
Supplemental Information 4. OTU tree.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-14
Supplemental Information 5. Predicted pathways.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5583/supp-15

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are provided in the Supplemental File.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES