Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2018 Sep 1;20:1142–1147. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.08.194

Dataset for material logistics on construction sites

Patience F Tunji-Olayeni a,, Adedeji O Afolabi a, Emmanuel E Eshofonie b, Beatrice A Ayim a
PMCID: PMC6140358  PMID: 30229129

Abstract

Data in this article describes logistics management on construction sites in Abuja, Nigeria. Data was elicited from 55 construction professionals comprising of Architects, Builders, Civil Engineers, Project Managers and Quantity Surveyors. The Data set in this study consists of responses on: factors affecting material purchase on construction sites, factors affecting accuracy of material delivery, challenges encountered during material delivery, benefits of material delivery on construction sites and methods of forecasting material demand on construction sites. This article provides insight into logistics management on construction sites in Nigeria and it can be a useful guide for similar research in other contexts.

Keywords: Construction industry, Logistics management, Material management


Specifications table

Subject area Construction
More specific subject area Material Logistics
Type of data Tables and Figures
How data was acquired Field Survey
Data format Raw
Experimental factors Random Sampling
Experimental features Descriptive statistics
Data source location Abuja, Nigeria
Data accessibility Data is included

Value of the data

  • The data provides insight into the significant factors affecting material purchase on construction sites

  • From the data, factors affecting accuracy of material delivery on construction sites can be obtained

  • The data presents critical factors to be considered in choosing a material handling equipment on construction sites.

  • From the data, the challenges associated with material logistics on construction sites are identified.

  • The data in this article can be modified for use in other context.

1. Data

Data for this article was solicited from construction professionals in Abuja, Nigeria.

Fig. 1 presents the mean values of the factors affecting material purchase on construction sites. The factors are: material quality (4.87), material price (4.71), volume of order (4.15), reputation of manufacturer (4.15), waiting time (3.85), competence of purchasing officer (3.76) and sales discount (3.53).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Factors affecting material purchase.

Fig. 2 highlights the mean of the factors affecting accuracy of material delivery on construction sites. These factors include: failure from supplier (3.67), order error (3.58), use of uncommon materials (3.51), altering work sequence (3.47) and payment delay (3.04).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Factors affecting accuracy of material delivery.

Fig. 3 provides the analysis of factors affecting material handling equipment including health and safety considerations (4.93), material quantity (4.45), equipment specification (4.38), equipment availability (4.24), equipment speed (4.16), cost of equipment (4.150) and building form (3.55).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Factors affecting choice of material handling equipment.

Table 1 shows the challenges associated with material logistics on construction sites. The challenges are: transportation (4.45), inadequate storage (4.18), delay in material delivery (4.13), supply of low quality material (4.07), poor coordination (4.02), inability to forecast activity period (3.91), inaccuracies in material delivery (3.67) and increase in waiting time (3.62).

Table 1.

Challenges associated with material logistics on construction sites.

Challenge N Minimum Maximum Mean
Transportation 55 2 5 4.45
Inadequate storage on site 55 2 5 4.18
Delay in material and component delivery 55 1 5 4.13
Supply of low quality material 55 1 5 4.07
Poor coordination among material planning team 55 1 5 4.02
Inability to forecast activity period with accuracy 55 1 5 3.91
Inaccuracies in material delivery 55 1 5 3.67
Increase waiting time between activities 55 1 5 3.62

In Fig. 4, the benefits of material logistics are provided and include: saves construction time (4.93), saves construction cost (4.75), improves customer satisfaction (4.60), timely delivery of materials (4.56), reduce storage space (4.55), reduce waiting time (4.24) and reduce multi handling (4.02).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Benefits of material logistics on construction sites.

Fig. 5, shows the common methods of forecasting material demand in construction sites, which are: work progress (78%), process flow chart (15%), experience (5%) and logistics software (2%).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Method of forecasting material demand on construction sites.

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

The data in this article was generated by means of a cross sectional survey of construction professionals in Abuja, Nigeria. Previous researchers [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] used similar approach to obtain empirical data from respondents. The questionnaire was adapted from similar previous studies [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] and modified. The questionnaire was divided into 6 sections. Section A was used to obtain questions about material purchase on construction sites. Section B covered questions on material handling. Section C had questions that focused on accuracy of material delivery. Section D included questions about the problems encountered in logistics. Section E had questions which probed for the benefits of logistics management. Sections A to E were based on a 5-point likert scale type question with 1= not important, 2 = slightly important, 3 = not sure, 4 = important, 5 = very important. Section F was used to obtain demographic information about the respondents. Seventy questionnaires were distributed to Architects, Builders, Civil Engineers, Project Managers and Quantity Surveyors on a simple random sampling basis. Out of the 70 questionnaires distributed, 55 were returned and found suitable for analysis. Data was analyzed by means of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 22.

Acknowledgements

The research is sponsored by Covenant University Center for Research Innovation and Development (CUCRID).

Footnotes

Transparency document

Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.08.194.

Appendix A

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.08.194.

Transparency document. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.doc (21.5KB, doc)

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc2.doc (62KB, doc)

References

  • 1.Ojelabi R.A., Afolabi A.O., Oyeyipo O.O., Tunji-Olayeni P.F., Adewale B.A. Data exploration of social client relationship management (2.0) adoption in the Nigerian construction business. Data Brief. 2018;18:1471–1476. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.A. Afolabi, R. Ojelabi, B. Adewale, A. Akinola and A. Afolabi, Statistical exploration of dataset examining key indicators influencing housing and urban infrastructure investments in mega cities, Data in Brief, 1, 8, pp. 1725–1733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Tunji-Olayeni P.F., Omuh I.O., Amusan L.M., Adedeji A.O., Ojelabi R.A., Ogundipe K.E. Attracting and retaining female students in construction related programs. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 2017:425–430. (Special Issue INTE) [Google Scholar]
  • 4.P. Tunji-Olayeni, A. Afolabi and O. Okpalamoka, Survey dataset on occupational hazards on construction sites, Data in Brief, 1, 8, pp. 1365–1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Ogunbayo B.F., Ajao A.M., Alagbe O.T., Ogundipe K.E., Tunji-Olayeni P.F. Residents׳ facilities satisfaction in housing project delivered by public private partnership (PPP) in Ogun state, Nigeria. Int. J. Civil. Eng. Technol. 2018;9(1):562–577. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tunji-Olayeni P.F., Owolabi J.D., Amusan L.M., Nduka D. Job satisfaction of female construction professionals in male dominated fields. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol. 2018;9(1):732–738. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tunji-Olayeni P.F., Ogunde A., Joshua O., Oni A.A. Work life balance of women in male dominated fields. Int. J. Civil. Eng. Technol. 2017;8(12):1197–1205. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tunji-Olayeni P.F., Afolabi A.O., Ojelabi R.A., Ayim B.A. Impact of logistics factors on material procurement for construction projects. Int. J. Civil. Eng. Technol. (IJCIET) 2017;8(12):1142–1148. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ibegbulem A.B., Okorie C. Assessment of materials management and profitability of an organization. J. Policy Dev. Stud. 2015;9(3):153–165. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.C. Formoso, L. Soibelman, C. Cesare and E. Isatto, Material waste in building industry: main causes and prevention. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(4)(202), pp. 316–325.
  • 11.Gulghane A.A., Khande P.V. Management for construction materials and control of construction waste in the construction industry: a review. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2015;5(4):59–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.A. Patil and S. Pataskar, Analysing material management technology on construction projects, International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology, 3(4), pp. 96–100.
  • 13.R. Jayan and A. Shameem, An empirical investigation about quality of work culture in logistics firms in Chennai, International Journal of Mechnaical Engineering and Technology, 8, 7, pp. 1001–1010.
  • 14.C. Poon, A. Yu and L. Jallion, Reducing building waste at construction sites in Hong Kong, Construction Management and Economics, 22, pp. 461–470.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.doc (21.5KB, doc)

Supplementary material

mmc2.doc (62KB, doc)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES