Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2018 Jun 2;19:1242–1249. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.143

Analysis of selected crime data in Nigeria

Pelumi E Oguntunde a,, Oluwadare O Ojo b, Hilary I Okagbue a, Omoleye A Oguntunde c
PMCID: PMC6140829  PMID: 30229003

Abstract

Crime is an act that brings about offences and it is punishable under the law. Major crimes in Nigeria include rape, kidnapping, murder, burglary, fraud, terrorism, robbery, cyber-crimes, bribery and corruption, money laundering and so on. According to the statistics released by the Nigerian National Bureau of Statistics in 2016, Lagos, Abuja, Delta, Kano, Plateau, Ondo, Oyo, Bauchi, Adamawa and Gombe States made the top ten list of states with high number of crimes. Crime is an important topic and it is of interest to us because of the consequences and penalties it attracts (which ranges from fine to death). This data article contains the partial analysis (both descriptive and inferential) of crime data set obtained between 1999 and 2013. The aim of the study is to show the pattern and rate of crime in Nigeria based on the data collected and to show the relationships that exist among the various crime types. Analyzing this data set can provide insight on crime activities within Nigeria.

Keywords: Crime, Deviant behavior, Offences, Population, Poverty, Unemployment, Nigeria


Specifications Table

Subject area Social Sciences
More specific subject area Psychology, Criminology, Social Statistics
Type of data Table and text file
How data was acquired Secondary data
Data format Raw, partial analyzed (Descriptive and Inferential)
Experimental factors Data sets on some reported crime activities in Nigeria between 1999 and 2013 (21 years).
Experimental features Observations on the number of cases of murder, arm robbery, assault, felonious wounding, man slaughter, bribery and corruption, burglary (including store breaking and house breaking).
Data source location The data was obtained from Nigeria׳s Bureau of Statistics (NBS) database
Data accessibility All the data are in this data article

Value of the data

  • The data provide insight on crime activities and its study can help in crime reduction (protection of communities) and decision making.

  • The partial analysis provided can be used to explain the relationships that exist between some of the crime activities.

  • The data is useful in the following areas: criminology, sociology, psychology and statistics.

  • The data can further be analyzed using other statistical methods like Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Panel data analysis and so on.

1. Data

The data in this article involves the reported cases of murder, arm robbery, assault, felonious wounding, man slaughter, bribery and corruption, burglary (including store breaking and house breaking) in Nigeria between the years 1999 and 2013. Ref. [1] has rated crime activities according to states in Nigeria and these criminal activities can be linked to poverty, unemployment, inflation, illiteracy, lack of education, greediness and over-population [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. The study of crime is however very important because of its several implications on the society at large. Other studies on crime can be found in Refs. [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20] and the references therein.

The dataset used in this study was collected as a secondary data and it can be assessed as Supplementary data. The nature of the data is such that it can be analyzed using correlation analysis, principal component analysis, time series analysis and so on.

The summary of the data is as provided in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary statistics of the data set on crime activities.

Crime types Mean Mode Sum Skewness Kurtosis
Murder 1814.48 1453a 38,104 1.056 0.565
Armed Robbery 2126.19 1064a 44,650 0.058 −1.317
Assault 43890.19 28,925a 921,694 −0.120 −1.271
Felonious Wounding 16667.05 9659a 350,008 1.257 4.317
Manslaughter 33.52 14a 704 0.935 0.074
Bribery and Corruption 208.00 10a 4368 0.878 −0.220
Burglary 22179.10 10,265a 465,761 3.520 14.231
a

Denotes multiple mode. However, the smallest number is shown.

From Table 1, Assault has the highest number of cases (with a total of 921,694 reported cases) over the years considered, followed by Burglary.

A graphical representation of the raw data is as shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Graphical representation of the number of crime activities.

Also, a graph representing the mean number of crimes reported for each of the crime types is as shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Graphical representation of the mean number of the different crime types.

From Fig. 2, Assault remains the most common type of crime reported based on its mean value followed by Burglary. The least among the crime types is Manslaughter. This also affirms the results in Table 1.

The pattern and trend of the crimes between 1999 and 2013 is made available in Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The pattern of murder cases for the 21 years.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The pattern of armed robbery cases for the 21 years.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

The pattern of assault cases for the 21 years.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

The pattern of felonious wounding cases for the 21 years.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

The pattern of man slaughter cases for the 21 years.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

The pattern of bribery and corruption cases for the 21 years.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

The pattern of burglary cases for the 21 years.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

The pattern of crime (total) for the 21 years.

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

This article shows the strength of linear relationship that exists between crime activities using correlation analysis. It further tests whether the linear relationship is significantly different from zero or not. In particular, the hypothesis tested for the linear relationship between murder and armed robbery is:

H0:

The linear relationship between murder and armed robbery is not significantly different from zero.

Versus

H1:

The linear relationship between murder and armed robbery is significantly different from zero.

The null hypothesis is however rejected if the p-value is less or equal to the level of significance (0.05).

Other descriptive methods as contained in Refs. [21], [22], [23], [24] can also be used to explain the patterns and trend of the data set collected. The result for the correlation analysis is made available in Table 2.

Table 2.

Results of the correlation analysis between the crime types (p-value in parenthesis).

Murder Armed Robbery Assault Felonious Wounding Manslaughter Bribery & Corruption Burglary
Murder 1 0.550 −0.605 0.359 −0.184 −0.317 −0.251
(0.010) (0.004) (0.110) (0.425) (0.162) (0.272)
Armed Robbery 1 −0.851 0.402 −0.792 −0.629 −0.597
(0.000) (0.071) (0.000) (0.002) (0.004)
Assault 1 −0.425 0.746 0.756 0.492
(0.055) (0.000) (0.000) (0.023)
Felonious Wounding 1 −0.501 −0.331 −0.221
(0.021) (0.142) (0.336)
Manslaughter 1 0.694 0.598
(0.000) (0.004)
Bribery & Corruption 1 0.497
(0.022)
Burglary 1

From Table 2, the results written in bold indicate a significant correlation among the pairs considered at 0.05 level of significance. We can however say that:

  • The positive linear relationship between murder and armed robbery is significantly different from zero.

  • The negative linear relationship between murder and armed assault is significantly different from zero.

  • The negative linear relationship between armed robbery and assault is significantly different from zero

  • There negative linear relationship between armed robbery and man slaughter is significantly different from zero.

  • The negative linear relationship between armed robbery and bribery and corruption is significantly different from zero.

  • There is a significant positive linear relationship between assault and man slaughter.

  • There is a significant positive linear relationship between assault and bribery and corruption.

  • There is a significant positive linear relationship between assault and burglary.

  • There is a significant negative linear relationship between felonious wounding and man slaughter.

  • There is a significant positive linear relationship between man slaughter and bribery and corruption.

  • There is a significant positive linear relationship between man slaughter and burglary.

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by Covenant University, Nigeria. The comments of the anonymous reviewers are also appreciated.

Footnotes

Transparency document

Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.143.

Appendix A

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.143.

Transparency document. Supplementary material

Supplementary material.

mmc1.pdf (118.6KB, pdf)

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary material.

mmc2.zip (676B, zip)

References

  • 1.Nigeria’s National Bureau of Statistics, Crime Statistics: Reported Offences by Type and States, 〈www.nigerianstat.gov.ng〉, 2016.
  • 2.Omotor D.G. Demographic and Socio-economic determinants of crimes in Nigeria (A panel data analysis) J. Appl. Bus. Econ. 2010;11(1):181–195. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Omotor D.G. Socio-economic determinants of crime in Nigeria. Pak. J. Social. Sci. 2009;6(2):54–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Odumosu O.F. Social costs of poverty: the case of crime in Nigeria. J. Social. Dev. Afr. 2009;14(2):71–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Akpotu N.E., Jike V.T. An analysis of the link between education and crime: prison inmates perception in Nigeria. On-line Educ. Res. J. 2004;4(4):1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.T.A. Egunjobi, Crime and unemployment: an emperical analysis, in: D.H. Balami, N.N. Ayara (Eds.). Employment Generation in Nigeria.
  • 7.Andresen M.A. A spatial analysis of crime in Vancouver, British Columbia: a synthesis of social disorganization and routine activity theory. Can. Geogr. 2006;50(4):487–502. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Baltagi B.H. Estimating an economic model of crime using panel data from North Carolina. J. Appl. Econ. 2006;21:543–547. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chamlin M.B., Cochran J.K. An excursus on the population size-crime relationship. West. Criminol. Rev. 2004;5(2):119–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Christens B., Speer P.W. Predicting violent crime using urban and suburban densities. Behav. Social. Issues. 2005;14:113–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Harries K. Property crimes and violence in United States: an analysis of the influence of population density. Int. J. Crime Justice Sci. 2006;1(2):24–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nolan J.J. Establishing the statistical relationship between population size and UCR crime rate: its impacts and implications. J. Crime Justice. 2004;32:547–555. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kepple N.J., Freisthler B. Exploring the ecological association between crime and medical marijuana dispensaries. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs. 2012;73(4):523–530. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Usman U., Yakubu M., Bello A.Z. An investigation on the rate of crime in Sokoto state using principal component analysis. Niger. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2012;20(2):152–160. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shopeju J.O. Urbanization and crime in Nigeria. Int. J. Agric. Sci. Environ. Technol. 2007;2(1):154–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ikoh M.U. Criminal victimization in Nigeria: pattern and Trend. In: Alemika E.E.O., Chukwuma I.C., editors. Crime Victimization, Safety and Policing in Nigeria. CLEEN Foundation; Lagos: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Edmark K. Unemployment and crime: is there a connection? Scand. J. Econ. 2005;107(2):353–373. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hassan A.B., Lass F.D., Makinde J. Cybercrime in Nigeria: causes, effects and the way out. ARPN J. Sci. Technol. 2012;2(7):626–631. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kunnuji M.O.N. Population density and armed robbery in Nigeria: an analysis of variation across states. Afr. J. Criminol. Justice Stud. 2016;9(1):62–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kilishi A.A., Mobolaji H.I., Usman A., Yakibu A.T., Yaru M.A. The effect of unemployment on crime in Nigeria: a panel data analysis. Br. J. Econ. Manag. Trade. 2014;4(6):880–895. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bishop S.A., Owoloko E.A., Okagbue H.I., Oguntunde P.E., Odetunmibi O.A., Opanuga A.A. Survey datasets on the externalizing behaviors of primary school pupils and secondary school students in some selected schools in Ogun State, Nigeria. Data Brief. 2017;13:469–479. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.06.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Oguntunde P.E., Adebowale A.O., Okagbue H.I. Breast cancer patients in Nigeria: data exploration approach. Data Brief. 2017;15:47–57. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.08.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Oguntunde P.E., Adejumo O.A., Odetunmibi O.A., Okagbue H.I., Adejumo A.O. Data analysis on physical and mechanical properties of cassava pellets. Data Brief. 2018;16:286–302. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.11.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Adejumo A.O., Ikoba N.A., Suleiman E.A., Okagbue H.I., Oguntunde P.E., Odetunmibi O.A., Job O. Data Brief. 2017;14:175–185. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.07.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material.

mmc1.pdf (118.6KB, pdf)

Supplementary material.

mmc2.zip (676B, zip)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES