Abstract
This article contains supportive data related to a research article entitled “Annual variation of species richness and lorica oral diameter characteristics of tintinnids in a semi-enclosed bay of western Pacific” (Feng et al., 2018) [1]. This article describes long term data of tintinnid assemblages in Jiaozhou Bay, Yellow sea, a semi-enclosed basin ecosystem of western Pacific, from May 2003 to December 2012. We sum up the whole dataset for each year showing tintinnid species occurrence and abundance at each site by date, as well as the photographic documentation of each tintinnid species. Further interpretation and discussion can be found in recently published by Feng et al. in Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science at Science.
Specifications Table
| Subject area | Biology |
|---|---|
| More specific subject area | Marine ecology, microzooplankton, ciliates |
| Type of data | Table, image (microscopy) |
| How data was acquired | Survey, Microscope |
| Data format | Raw and processed data |
| Experimental factors | Field sampling at 4 sites monthly during a ten-year cycle |
| Experimental features | Observed and counted under microscope using method of Utermöhl (1958) after filtered through a net (mesh size 20 μm) |
| Data source location | Jiaozhou Bay, China, 35.98-36.16°N, 120.25-120.43°E |
| Data accessibility | data is with this article |
| Related research article | [1]Feng MP, Wang CF, Zhang WC, et al. Annual variation of species richness and lorica oral diameter characteristics of tintinnids in a semi-enclosed bay of western Pacific. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2018 207:164–174. |
Value of the data
-
●
This dataset contains raw and processed data of tintinnid assemblages, one of the important microzooplankton groups, at 4 sampling sites during a ten-year cycle in a semi-enclosed Bay in western Pacific.
-
●
The variation of plankton groups as well as phenology and be explored and analyzed using such statistical methods as analysis of variance, regression, factor analysis, cluster analysis, or structural equation modeling.
-
●
New collaborations about copepods, Chl a, and other zooplankton groups, and microbial food loop are welcome.
1. Experimental design, materials and methods
Tintinnid samples were collected aboard R/V ‘Kejiao No.1’ in Jiaozhou Bay, Yellow sea, in the temperate western Pacific. Samplings were conducted at 4 sites (St. A5, C3, D7, and D8) once a month from May 2003 to December 2012. A 30 L surface water was collected at each site by a large volume water sampler and then filtered slowly and gently through a net (mesh size 20 μm). The concentrated tintinnid samples (~150 ml) were fixed with formalin solution to 5% final concentration. Subsamples of 20 ml from well-mixed concentrated samples were pipetted into a sedimentation chamber and settled for 12–24 h [2], and subsequently counted under an Olympus IX 71 inverted microscope (200× or 400×) with photographic measurement system.
Tintinnid species identifications were made on the basis of lorica morphology and dimensions according to literatures [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].
2. Data
2.1. Tintinnid species richness
A total of 26 species belonging to 9 genera were found in the 428 samples (Fig. 1). Tintinnid species richness ranged from 0 to 20, and the maximum occurred at St. C3 and St. D8 in August 2006. Tintinnid species had been found in all the samples except the sample of St. D8 in December 2009. The ranges of species richness for St. A5, St. C3, St. D8, and St. D7 were 0–16, 0–20, 0–20, and 1–15, respectively. According to the biogeographical pattern of [14], all the 9 genera found belong to neritic (Favella, Leprotintinnus, Metacylis, Stenosemella, Tintinnidium, Tintinnopsis) and cosmopolitan (Amphorellopsis, Codonellopsis, Eutintinnus) biogeographical types.
Fig. 1.
Images of tintinnid species occurred in Jiaozhou Bay during 2003–2012 (scale bar: 20 μm).
2.2. Tintinnid abundance
The abundance of tintinnid assemblages were different in the four sampling sites (Table 1). The ranges of abundance for St. A5, St. C3, St. D8, and St. D7 were 1–3197 ind L−1, 2–1300 ind L−1, 0–1030 ind L−1, and 1–1102 ind L−1, respectively.
Table 1.
Data showing tintinnid abundance (ind L−1) for each year at each site by month.
| Site | Year | Abundance |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | ||
| A5 | 2003 | 270 | 178 | 46 | 621 | 119 | 49 | 1452 | 1 | ||||
| 2004 | 7 | 7 | 12 | 187 | 162 | 3970 | 181 | 341 | 72 | 149 | 20 | 6 | |
| 2005 | 2 | 11 | 29 | 239 | 297 | 147 | 42 | 229 | 58 | 52 | 45 | 7 | |
| 2006 | 2 | 46 | 127 | 521 | 38 | 39 | 1355 | 197 | 123 | 56 | 27 | 168 | |
| 2007 | 1 | 5 | 402 | 59 | 235 | 34 | 260 | 421 | 97 | 336 | 263 | 63 | |
| 2008 | 8 | 58 | 45 | 25 | 200 | 74 | 8 | 11 | 81 | 274 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2009 | 23 | 8 | 685 | 60 | 8 | 77 | 1441 | 528 | 373 | 255 | 20 | 0 | |
| 2010 | 2 | 165 | 79 | 11 | 128 | 21 | 0 | 57 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 45 | |
| 2011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 175 | 59 | 40 | 829 | 81 | 67 | 51 | 165 | 10 | |
| 2012 | 2 | 4 | 122 | 305 | 0 | 60 | 102 | 100 | 12 | 5 | 385 | 14 | |
| C3 | 2003 | 38 | 740 | 128 | 70 | 42 | 30 | 269 | 18 | ||||
| 2004 | 27 | 8 | 11 | 57 | 158 | 50 | 150 | 603 | 189 | 15 | 34 | 14 | |
| 2005 | 6 | 7 | 79 | 466 | 624 | 1084 | 50 | 201 | 82 | 58 | 51 | 24 | |
| 2006 | 35 | 234 | 472 | 59 | 394 | 1023 | 1300 | 276 | 91 | 34 | 32 | 92 | |
| 2007 | 4 | 121 | 205 | 15 | 94 | 444 | 22 | 505 | 71 | 31 | 124 | 106 | |
| 2008 | 16 | 63 | 53 | 8 | 22 | 435 | 7 | 67 | 13 | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2009 | 20 | 43 | 490 | 82 | 26 | 23 | 351 | 18 | 32 | 38 | 21 | 0 | |
| 2010 | 21 | 608 | 304 | 39 | 9 | 34 | 0 | 33 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 13 | |
| 2011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 96 | 28 | 245 | 186 | 157 | 27 | 4 | 18 | |
| 2012 | 24 | 12 | 63 | 264 | 0 | 28 | 83 | 7 | 11 | 2 | 39 | 60 | |
| D7 | 2003 | 40 | 935 | 54 | 33 | 31 | 11 | 200 | 17 | ||||
| 2004 | 27 | 4 | 1 | 87 | 11 | 102 | 21 | 1102 | 94 | 38 | 107 | 8 | |
| 2005 | 20 | 12 | 55 | 577 | 7 | 585 | 83 | 43 | 46 | 13 | 37 | 18 | |
| 2006 | 15 | 91 | 99 | 12 | 32 | 122 | 337 | 293 | 60 | 57 | 18 | 18 | |
| 2007 | 20 | 37 | 147 | 83 | 16 | 38 | 35 | 258 | 23 | 28 | 52 | 64 | |
| 2008 | 30 | 46 | 147 | 8 | 7 | 40 | 4 | 26 | 26 | 22 | 75 | 0 | |
| 2009 | 25 | 8 | 180 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 27 | 32 | 32 | 0 | |
| 2010 | 22 | 211 | 0 | 81 | 3 | 28 | 0 | 167 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 11 | |
| 2011 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 29 | 6 | 122 | 437 | 32 | 9 | 20 | 26 | |
| 2012 | 14 | 10 | 19 | 168 | 0 | 26 | 21 | 196 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 20 | |
| D8 | 2003 | 145 | 675 | 85 | 478 | 28 | 13 | 54 | 33 | ||||
| 2004 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 32 | 77 | 65 | 39 | 1030 | 110 | 20 | 55 | 11 | |
| 2005 | 15 | 22 | 12 | 310 | 28 | 578 | 139 | 56 | 46 | 61 | 19 | 17 | |
| 2006 | 11 | 74 | 152 | 16 | 20 | 92 | 347 | 297 | 73 | 36 | 24 | 14 | |
| 2007 | 35 | 20 | 54 | 69 | 13 | 320 | 48 | 278 | 30 | 40 | 75 | 87 | |
| 2008 | 23 | 101 | 91 | 46 | 0 | 769 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 16 | 80 | 0 | |
| 2009 | 9 | 12 | 105 | 80 | 13 | 2 | 10 | 17 | 23 | 16 | 22 | 0 | |
| 2010 | 10 | 181 | 155 | 197 | 11 | 27 | 0 | 47 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 5 | |
| 2011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 13 | 2 | 154 | 413 | 66 | 27 | 20 | 23 | |
| 2012 | 10 | 17 | 14 | 77 | 0 | 18 | 57 | 11 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 21 | |
Blank means no sampling in the site in the month.
2.3. Tintinnid species occurrence
Species occurrence were showed in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 in different site respectively. Based on the multi-year and multi-site investigations, 10 species had a year-round distribution, 2 species could occur in 11 months. Among the 9 genera, genus Tintinnopsis had more species (15) than other genera. The remaining genera were represented by 1 or 2 species. All the species have agglutinated lorica except 4 hyaline species: Amphorellopsis acuta, Eutintinnus lusus-undae, Favella sp. and Metacylis jorgensenii. All the 4 hyaline species occurred in July-September period. Hyaline forms herein occurred mainly in summer, as well as agglutinated forms peaked in summer.
Table 2.
Tintinnid species occurrence for each month in each year at St. A5.
![]() |
Yellow shows the species occurred in the site in the month. sp1 Amphorellopsis acuta, sp2 Codonellopsis sp., sp3 C. mobilis, sp4 Eutintinnus lusus-undae, sp5 Favella sp., sp6 Leprotintinnus nordqvisti, sp7 L. simplex, sp8 Metacylis jorgensenii, sp9 Rhizodomus tagatzi, sp10 Stenosemella nivalis, sp11 Tintinnidium mucicola, sp12 Tm. primitivum, sp13 Tintinnopsis cylindrica, sp14 T. amoyensis, sp15 T. beroidea, sp16 T. brasiliensis, sp17 T. butshlii, sp18 T. chinglanensis, sp19 T. directa, sp20 T. japonica, sp21 T. lohmanni, sp22 T. minima, sp23 T. radix, sp24 T. schotti, sp25 T. tocantinensis, sp26 T. tubulosoides.
Table 3.
Tintinnid species occurrence for each month in each year at St. C3.
![]() |
Yellow shows the species occurred in the site in the month. Sp1, …sp26 see in Table 2.
Table 4.
Tintinnid species occurrence for each month in each year at St. D8.
![]() |
Yellow shows the species occurred in the site in the month. Sp1, …sp26 see in Table 2.
Table 5.
Tintinnid species occurrence for each month in each year at St. D7.
![]() |
Yellow shows the species occurred in the site in the month. Sp1, …sp26 see in Table 2.
Acknowledgements
This study is financially supported by funds from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC nos. 41576164, U1606404, 41306161, 31702346), Scientific Research Foundation (SRF, Q1433) of Zhejiang Ocean University, Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province Program (2017F50017, LGN18C030003), Marine fisheries research institute of Zhejiang, and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. LY17C190006). We thank the captain and crew of R/V ‘Kejiao No.1’ for their assistance.
Footnotes
Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.06.010.
Contributor Information
Wuchang Zhang, Email: wuchangzhang@qdio.ac.cn.
Henglong Xu, Email: henglongxu@126.com.
Transparency document. Supplementary material
Supplementary material
.
References
- 1.Feng M.P., Wang C.F., Zhang W.C. Annual variation of species richness and lorica oral diameter characteristics of tintinnids in a semi-enclosed bay of western Pacific. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2018;207:164–174. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Utermöhl H. Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton Methodik. Mitt. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 1958;9:1–38. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kofoid C.A., Campbell A.S. University of California Press; California: 1929. A Conspectus of the Marine and Fresh-water Ciliata Belonging to the Suborder Tintinnoinea: with Descriptions of New Species Principally from the Agassiz Expedition to the Eastern Tropical Pacific 1904–1905. [Google Scholar]
- 4.C. Kofoid, A. Campbell, Reports on the scientific results of the expedition to the eastern tropical Pacific, in charge to Alexander Agassiz, by US Fish commision steamer “Albatross”, from October 1904 to March 1905, Lieut.-Commander LM Garrett, USN commanding. XXXVII. The Ciliata: The Tintinnoinea, Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology of Harvard College, Harvard, 1939.
- 5.C.C. Wang, D.S. Nie, A survey of the marine protozoa of amoy. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory of the Science Society of China, Zoological Series, 1932, 8, pp. 285–385.
- 6.Y. Hada, Pelagic Ciliata of Akkeshi Bay. Journal of Faculty of Science, Hokkaido Imperial University Ser. 4 Zoology, 1937, 5, pp. 143–216.
- 7.Campbell A.S. Vol. 537. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication; 1942. (The Oceanic Tintinnoina of the Plankton Gathered during the Last Cruise of the Carnegie). [Google Scholar]
- 8.D.S. Nie, P.S. Cheng, Tintinnoinea of the Hainan region. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory of the Science Society of China: Zoological Series, 1947, 16, pp. 41–86.
- 9.Yin K.T. Primitive investigation of tintinnids in Jiaozhou Bay. J. Shandong Univ. 1952;2:36–56. [Google Scholar]
- 10.S.M. Marshall, Protozoa, order Tintinnia, in: Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer, Fiches d’Indentification de Zooplancton, Fiches, 1969, pp. 117–124.
- 11.Agatha S., Riedel-Lorje J.C. Redescription of Tintinnopsis cylindrica Daday, 1887 (Ciliophora: spirotricha) and unification of tintinnid terminology. Acta Protozool. 2006;45(2):137–151. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Saccà A., Struder-Kypke M.C., Lynn D.H. Redescription of Rhizodomus tagatzi (Ciliophora: spirotrichea: Tintinnida), based on morphology and small subunit ribosomal rna gene sequence. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2012;59(3):218–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00615.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang W.C., Feng M.P., Yu Y., Zhang C.X., Xiao T. Science Press; Beijing: 2012. An Illustrated Guide to Contemporary Tintinnids in the World. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dolan, J.R., Pierce, R.W., Diversity and distributions of tintinnid ciliates. In Dolan, J.R., Agatha, S., Coats, D.W., et al. (Eds), the biology and ecology of tintinnid ciliates: models for marine plankton, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 2705, pp. 214–243.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary material





