Introduction
Availability and access to oral anticancer drugs (OACDs) is increasing and expected to continue, given the number of oral forms of therapy currently in development1 and the use of these agents for nonmalignant indications (i.e., rheumatologic and immunologic disease). Despite this trend, few guidelines, if any, target the safe use and handling of OACDs in the community pharmacy setting. Moreover, despite the potential for serious patient harm if OACDs are used in error, fewer safeguards are in place to ensure the safe use and handling of OACDs than for intravenous (IV) forms of cancer drugs.2 While this may be because of a general misconception that the risks associated with OACDs are lower than for IV chemotherapy, the hazards of occupational exposure through inhalation, dermal and/or oral contamination require appropriate controls to reduce risk. Moreover, OACDs are considered high-alert medications (https://www.ismp.org/tools/highalertmedicationLists.asp) because of the harm introduced when an error occurs.
This consensus guideline complements existing provincial and national legislation, regulation and professional practice standards and is intended to supplement mandatory legislative requirements. In the event of inconsistency or conflict between the recommendations in this document and any mandatory or more restrictive requirements, the latter shall prevail. All applicable/mandatory legislative requirements must be adhered to.
It is recommended that a self-assessment of safety practices (with a specific focus on handling) be conducted at baseline (if this has not been done previously) and at regular intervals. The Medication Safety Self-Assessment for Community/Ambulatory Pharmacy tool (https://www.ismp-canada.org/amssa/) from the Institute for Safe Medication Practices Canada may be used for this purpose. Results from the self-assessment should be used to identify areas for quality improvement to ensure safe practices in community pharmacy settings.
Scope and relevance
Exposure to OACDs can occur at any point along the medication life cycle. As a result, this consensus guideline addresses packaging, labelling, receiving and unpacking, storage, drug preparation and handling, verification and dispensing, transportation, personal protective equipment, disposal, waste management and cleaning and incident reporting.
Environmental monitoring and medical surveillance were determined to be out of scope for this document but may be revisited if compelling evidence emerges for their relevance in these often low-volume settings.
While it is believed that these recommendations are likely of relevance to health care providers working in settings other than community pharmacy, such as long-term care, compounding centres, penitentiaries, respite and other day facilities where OACDs may be used to treat cancer and other nonmalignant diseases, they are designed to address safe handling issues in the community pharmacy setting specifically. Individuals working in other environments with OACDs that are used for other nonmalignant indications or who handle other types of hazardous drugs are encouraged to assess the relevance of these recommendations in their own practice settings and to implement those that are relevant and applicable. Please see Appendix 1 (available online) for definitions of frequently used words in this document.
Hazardous drug definition
While there is no single list of hazardous drugs that is accepted worldwide, the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) produces and updates a list periodically that can be used as a guide from which to develop a workplace or setting-specific hazardous drug list based on an inventory of the drugs handled and the potential for exposure. Guidance on how these workplace-specific lists should be developed is available through NIOSH (http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/index.htm). OACDs are among the many drugs that are considered hazardous.
Definition of oral anticancer drugs
For the purpose of these recommendations, an OACD is a drug that is used to treat cancer (or other indications) and is given by mouth and includes some hormonal agents. The health risks associated with exposure to individual OACDs are typically assessed based on their potential for carcinogenicity, teratogenicity, genotoxicity, reproductive toxicity or organ toxicity. In addition, exposure risk should be evaluated based on modifying factors, including the packaging of the agent for oral consumption (i.e., blister vs loose), formulation (i.e., coated vs uncoated tablet; tablet or capsule vs liquid) and frequency of exposure, although the latter can be difficult to quantify. Information on the potential hazard level of a drug may be found in resources such as the safety data sheets produced by drug manufacturers and the list of hazardous drugs maintained by NIOSH.
Types of exposure and hazard control
Exposure to OACDs can vary but typically occur by inhalation of dust, particles and/or droplets (if a product is aerosolized or if product vapour exists); dermal contact through direct primary contact with the drug or drug powders present on the outside of containers or on contaminated surfaces during preparation; administration or disposal of OACD waste and/or oral contact through hand-to-mouth exposure or inadvertent ingestion.
Currently, there are no recommended exposure limits for OACDs, permissible exposure limits or threshold limit values established for hazardous drugs in general (e.g., by groups such as NIOSH, Occupational Safety and Health Administration or the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, respectively). The likelihood that a worker will experience adverse effects from hazardous drugs increases with the amount and frequency of hazardous drug exposure and the lack of proper work practices.
Protection from hazardous drug exposure depends on adherence to safety programs established by employers and followed by workers. A comprehensive approach to eliminate or minimize worker exposure should be part of a safety and health program that includes safe work practices, proper engineering controls, personal protective equipment and training appropriate to the employee’s job function, skill and knowledge.
There is limited literature to quantify the magnitude of contamination within the various workspaces of a community pharmacy. Similarly, the long-term health effects on those working in the community setting is largely unknown because the focus has traditionally been on staff within a hospital pharmacy, where the frequency and volume of exposure are substantially greater. Until evidence specific to the community pharmacy setting is available, a basic occupational health approach applying a hierarchy of controls to eliminate or minimize exposure should be applied. This includes, in order of hierarchy, limiting exposure through elimination of the hazard or substitution to replace the hazard with a less hazardous drug (often not feasible in health care), engineering controls to isolate workers from the hazard (i.e., containment cabinet, use of unit-dose packaging), administrative controls to change the way people interact with their environment (i.e., storing OACDs in a segregated, labeled space to visually remind workers that special handling precautions are required) and, as the last line of protection, personal protective equipment (i.e., chemotherapy gloves, chemotherapy gowns, respiratory protection if risk of inhalation exists). In developing this consensus guideline, the hierarchy of controls was carefully considered and incorporated.
Approach to the development of a consensus guideline in a low-volume setting
There is a paucity of evidence regarding the potential health impacts associated with the often infrequent, short-term and low-volume exposure to OACDs in the community pharmacy setting. Few, if any, minimum thresholds for “safe” levels of occupational exposure of OACDs or other hazardous drugs have been established.
The recommendations in this consensus guideline were deliberately designed to be pragmatic and to introduce a moderate approach that would encourage a systemwide and gradual change in community pharmacy policy and practice.
Recommendations
Packaging
The manner in which manufacturers or distributors package OACDs, as well as other hazardous drugs, may be an influence on the degree of exposure (Table 1).
Table 1.
Manufacturer packaging
| 1.1 | Manufacturers of oral anticancer drugs should:
|
| 1.2 | Distributors of oral anticancer drugs should:
|
| 1.3 | Those responsible for supply chain management and oral anticancer drug procurement in the community pharmacy setting may preferentially consider manufacturers and distributors whose practices promote delivery of a product that minimizes potential occupational exposure by handlers along the supply chain.6-8 |
Receiving and unpacking
Within the community pharmacy setting, space is limited and pharmacy tasks may be shared among the pharmacy dispensary and nondispensary staff (Table 2). Pharmacy managers must take steps to develop and implement work practice policies and procedures to ensure that unintentional occupational exposure to OACDs is avoided. Education and tools (e.g., visual aids and/or checklists) must be provided so that receiving and unpacking occurs safely. Furthermore, policies and procedures for managing damaged shipments must be developed to avoid confusion about whether the pharmacy or the manufacturer/distributor is responsible for the cost of replacement product if a product package has been damaged during transport.
Table 2.
Receiving and unpacking
| 2.1 | Best practice recommends that receiving and unpacking of shipments that contain oral anticancer drugs should be in a separate room. If that is not possible, receiving and unpacking should be in a designated, low-traffic area.6,7,9-11 |
| 2.2 | The task of receiving and unpacking drug deliveries that contain oral anticancer drugs should be the responsibility of specific individuals. These individuals should be given this responsibility only after completion of job-specific training.6,9 A process should be in place to ensure adequate staff coverage in instances where the primary individual is absent. |
| 2.3 | The outside of cartons is examined for possible damage or leakage prior to unpacking in the event they contain oral anticancer drugs.4-7,9,11 |
| 2.4 | Deliveries containing oral anticancer drugs where the integrity of the original manufacturer’s package has been compromised, leading to the potential for occupational exposure to a hazardous drug, should be dealt with in the same manner as a spill. See Table 8.6,7 |
| 2.5 | When an oral anticancer drug is received without appropriate warning labels, the pharmacy manager or other designated member of the pharmacy team should notify the originator (i.e., distributor, group purchasing agent or other) and reinforce the importance of affixing warning labels to indicate to those handling the delivery that special handling precautions are required.5 |
Storage
Distinctive labels and physical separation of OACDs from nonhazardous drugs is commonly recommended as an occupational health and safety measure to limit staff exposure, lower the risk of a medication error through incorrect selection of medication and visually indicate that special handling precautions are required (Table 3).
Table 3.
Storage
| 3.1 | Oral anticancer drugs should be stored in a designated area, separate from nonhazardous drugs, and labelled with warnings that indicate the need for special precautions. If stored in a separate room or area, it should be clearly marked.3,5-10,12,13 |
| 3.2 | Access to areas where oral anticancer drugs are stored should be restricted to staff who have received appropriate training. See Table 9, section 9.2.6,9 |
Drug preparation and handling
While the dispensing volume of OACDs in community pharmacies may be low, the potential for exposure supports the need for vigilance (Table 4). Where exposure limits exist (i.e., American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, NIOSH or province-specific resources such as Ontario Regulation 833—Control of Exposure to Biological and Chemical Agents), the employer must ensure compliance.
Table 4.
Preparation and handling
| 4.1 | Employers must take every reasonable precaution to limit individual staff member exposure to oral anticancer drugs so as not to exceed occupational exposure limits when these limits exist or, when they do not, to levels as low as reasonably achievable.8,14 |
| 4.1.1 | Nonsterile compounding of oral anticancer drugs should be
done in a Class I biological safety cabinet (BSC).14,15
When nonsterile compounding of oral anticancer drugs in a containment cabinet is not possible, community pharmacies not equipped with a containment cabinet should consider:
If it is not feasible to redirect or change the dose and the nonsterile compounding of a drug is deemed to be necessary and in the best interest of the patient, prepare the drug using personal protective equipment (see Appendix 2, available online), including 2 pairs of chemotherapy gloves (ASTM standard, see Appendix 2), a nonpermeable gown and respiratory protection (i.e., N95 or better) in a low-traffic area. If there is a risk of splashing, eye protection should also be used.3,8,12,18-22 |
| 4.1.2 | Dedicated preparation equipment (i.e., counting trays) should be used to count oral anticancer drugs that do not require compounding. This equipment should be labelled for anticancer agent use only.9 |
| 4.1.3 | The following should not be used when dispensing oral
anticancer drugs:
|
| 4.1.4 | A list of hazardous drugs, including oral anticancer drugs, should be readily accessible to any individual who may come in contact with them in their work environment.3 This list should be reviewed and updated periodically to ensure continued relevance. |
Evidence-based standards vary regarding the use of containment cabinets and personal protective equipment when the prescribed dose of an OACD is not commercially available and compounding of nonsterile hazardous drugs is required. Additional recommendations provided by NIOSH state that in the absence of a containment cabinet, the compounding of nonsterile hazardous drugs may be performed using alternative safe-work practices while wearing personal protective equipment in a low-traffic, designated area of the pharmacy.
Finally, the use of any other readily available material or equipment to further reduce inadvertent OACD exposure or spread should be considered very carefully along all points in the dispensing process, especially activities related to nonsterile compounding without the use of a containment cabinet (e.g., “Dissolve-a-Dose” containers, crushing tablets [using a mortar] and splitting tablets inside an enclosed clear, resealable bag, wetting a tablet prior to crushing to minimize aerosolization of particles).
Verification and dispensing
The dispensing of OACDs should be accomplished in a manner that minimizes contamination to the surrounding area, both in the workplace and in the patient’s home (Table 5). This includes dispensing these agents in original packaging if tablets are packaged by the manufacturer or distributor in full-cycle packaging or individual unit dosing. When this is not available, package in a manner that prevents/minimizes contamination or access by unintended individuals.
Table 5.
Verification and dispensing
| 5.1 | When dispensing oral anticancer drugs, community pharmacy
staff should:
|
| 5.2 | When oral anticancer drugs cannot be dispensed in person and direct-to-patient courier delivery is being considered, the dispensing pharmacy should recommend that at least the initial filled prescription be reviewed in person to enable provider-to-patient discussion, training and education to supplement that provided by the patient’s cancer care team. |
| 5.2.1 | When direct-to-patient courier delivery does occur, all
national and provincial standards must be met. In addition,
the delivery of an oral anticancer drug should only occur
when it has been confirmed that someone is available to
receive the delivery. The receiver of the delivery should be
able to assume accountability for the delivered
package. The delivery process should include a chain of signatures to assist with delivery tracking. Packages of oral anticancer drugs should not be left on a doorstep or in a mailbox. As best practice, a documented follow-up call should occur to confirm the patient has received the delivery and understands how to take the medicine and to answer any questions that arise. |
| 5.3 | Ensure the traceability of a dispensed product that is aligned with legislative requirements, where they exist. At minimum, the batch/lot number, along with expiry date (and other required information), should be documented in the medication management system in the event of a product recall. The use of barcoding may assist with this process. |
In addition to safe handling dispensing practices below, other parameters that promote patient safety should be considered, including those outlined in the Canadian Association of Provincial Cancer Agencies’ document, Oral Cancer Drug Therapy Safe Use and Safe Handling Guidelines.24 Pharmacy team members should be aware of and follow recommended practices, including but not limited to dispensing only one cycle of OACDs at a time and ensuring that both dispensing and cognitive verification checks are conducted by individuals who are knowledgeable and trained to accept responsibility for the clinical safety of the prescription.
Clinical verification of OACDs in community pharmacy settings can be a difficult task to fully complete. Often community pharmacists have limited access to patient medical records. They may also have limited training related to cancer treatment and little exposure to OACDs due to low dispensing volumes. As a result, it is recommended that OACD prescriptions be reviewed by a pharmacist with experience and training in cancer treatment. When this is not possible, it is important that a network be established such that a pharmacist with experience and training in cancer treatment is available for consultation and the use of a checklist is implemented to facilitate clinical verification.25,26 Additionally, telephone orders should not be allowed, as they can introduce errors, especially if a pharmacist is not familiar with cancer treatment regimens.
Concerns about the safe handling of OACDs by community pharmacists may multiply when prescriptions are delivered directly to a patient without the benefit of any in-person pharmacist and patient interaction. While direct-to-patient delivery offers advantages for patients, including fewer visits, less travel and improved convenience, it simultaneously reduces the opportunity for face-to-face education and toxicity and adherence assessment, among other relevant and important issues. While there are programs designed to offer telephone counselling to patients or caregivers prior to direct-to-patient courier prescription delivery and call-back programs to provide adherence and toxicity monitoring after delivery, these programs are not consistently available and may be inadvertently omitted if patients are on multiple medications, including non-OACDs. Without this additional due diligence, direct-to-patient courier delivery is not considered ideal and is not recommended until after the initial OACD prescription is dispensed to the patient in person.
Personal protective equipment
Hazards exist in most workplaces, and in a pharmacy environment, whether community or otherwise, workers are likely to come in contact with hazardous drugs. Although there are other more effective controls to protect against exposure to hazardous drugs (e.g., controlling a substance at its source [elimination], substitution, engineering controls and administrative controls), personal protective equipment (PPE) remains the last and possibly the only line of defense when other controls are not in existence or are not obtainable, are rendered ineffective because of a temporary breakdown or as an interim control measure while engineering and administrative controls are being implemented (Table 6).
Table 6.
Personal protective equipment
| 6.1 | Appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) should be available and worn wherever oral anticancer drugs are handled (i.e., unpacking, storing, dispensing and disposing). PPE shall be removed before leaving the dispensary.6,7,10-12,18,20 |
| 6.1.1 | No PPE is required:
|
| 6.2 | When unpacking or placing oral anticancer drugs into storage area, 2 pairs of chemotherapy gloves (ASTM standard, see Appendix 2) should be worn.6,15 |
| 6.3 | During collection and transport of hazardous waste and when waste is in an open container, a protective gown (i.e., impermeable) should be worn in addition to 2 pairs of chemotherapy gloves (ASTM standard), and if there is a risk of a splash or spill, a protective gown, respiratory protective equipment (i.e., N95 or better) and protective eye wear should be worn. |
| 6.4 | During cleaning of the designated preparation area or when repackaging nonsterile oral anticancer drugs (i.e., liquid oral solutions, uncoated tablets), 2 pairs of chemotherapy gloves should be worn (ASTM standard), and if there is a risk of a splash or spill, a protective gown, respiratory protective equipment (e.g., N95 or better) and protective eye wear should be worn.6,7,24 |
| 6.5 | When cleaning the containment cabinet, 2 pairs of chemotherapy gloves (ASTM standard), a protective gown, respiratory protective equipment (e.g., N95 or better), protective eye wear, a hair cover and shoe covers should be worn.6,7,15 |
| 6.6 | When handling damaged packages containing oral anticancer drugs or if a spill occurs, full PPE should be worn, including 2 pairs of chemotherapy gloves (ASTM standard), a protective gown, shoe covers, eye protection and respiratory protective equipment (e.g., N95 or better) if there is a risk of aerosolization of drug residue.4 Facilities with access to a biological safety cabinet should open damaged packages inside the containment cabinet.14,15 |
| 6.7 | All PPE should be changed in accordance with the manufacturer’s directions after use, immediately if contaminated or if contamination is suspected. Disposable PPE should be disposed of in an appropriate hazardous waste container. Reusable PPE, such as protective eye wear, should be cleaned with soap and water after use and allowed to air-dry before reuse or storage.27 |
| 6.8 | Hands should be washed with soap and water after removing PPE.3,7,8,17,21,27 |
Gloves
The gloves used to handle hazardous drugs must be powder free, made of latex or nitrile (polyurethane or neoprene are also acceptable) and comply with ASTM standard D-6978-05 (standard for chemotherapy gloves). Due to the allergenic properties of latex, other materials are often used. Vinyl gloves are not recommended, as they are more permeable to hazardous drugs. Gloves may be sterile or nonsterile. Workers should change both sets of gloves every 30 minutes or less in the event of contamination, spillage or breakage of oral solutions. All gloves have some degree of permeability to hazardous drugs. This permeability increases over time, but 30 minutes is an appropriate average time that ensures protection.7 A pragmatic approach was taken with the consensus guideline, and 2 pairs of chemotherapy gloves are recommended to avoid confusion when trying to recall the number of gloves to wear when handling OACDs.
Gown
The gowns used when handling hazardous drugs should be disposable; made of lint-free, low-permeability fabric; have long sleeves with adjustable cuffs and tie or fasten in the back. Polypropylene gowns coated with polyethylene or vinyl are recommended when handling oral solutions. Workers should change gowns in the event of contamination, spillage or breakage of containers with oral solutions. The supplier must be able to certify that the gown protects against hazardous drugs. It is not recommended to reuse gowns.7
Disposal and waste management
Notwithstanding the low volume of OACDs dispensed by community pharmacies, the importance of disposing of hazardous waste in accordance with legislation, regulation and best practice remains a vital operational issue not only for environmental reasons but also to ensure that worker exposure during this end process is also limited (Table 7). Regardless of the low volume of OACDs dispensed by community pharmacies, the corporate entities to which they belong should establish and internally disseminate organization-wide policies about disposal and waste management, and individual stores and individual practitioners should be expected to demonstrate compliance.
Table 7.
Disposal and waste management
| 7.1 | The dispensing pharmacist should instruct the patient to return unused medication to dispensing or other pharmacy for disposal and not to dispose with household waste. To minimize inappropriate disposal in the home, pharmacies should accept oral anticancer drugs for disposal even if dispensed at another pharmacy. This should be reinforced in written material given to the patient.17,21 |
| 7.2 | Hazardous waste containers should:
|
| 7.3 | Segregate hazardous waste as soon as it is generated.23 |
| 7.4 | Hazardous waste pickup should be scheduled for pickup and delivery to a facility that incinerates hazardous waste, avoiding peak activity in the pharmacy.6,7,10 |
| 7.5 | Dispensing equipment (e.g., tray, spatula) and hard surfaces
(e.g., counter) that come in contact with oral anticancer
drugs should be:
Isopropyl alcohol should not be used as a cleaning solution, as it can dissolve and spread drug residue instead of removing it.13 Carpets are not easily cleaned and should be avoided in the pharmacy area.4 |
Spill protocol
Spills may occur at any stage of the OACD process, from receiving, storage, dispensing, to waste management. A policy, procedure or guideline should be established to handle any spill situation (Table 8). There is insufficient evidence at this time to recommend a spill kit for patients taking OACDs only in the home.
Table 8.
Spill protocol
| 8.1 | A policy, procedure or guideline should be in place that
specifies:
The safety data sheets for products used for cleaning and decontamination must be made available onsite and be easily accessible.7 |
| 8.2 | Spill kits should be clearly labelled and available in all areas where oral anticancer drugs are handled and stored.4,7,10-12,27 |
| 8.3 | The spill kit located in community pharmacy should
include:
|
Training and education
Staff training and education on the safe handling of OACDs is critical to a safe practice (Table 9). Policies and procedures should be developed centrally. Training programs should reflect these policies, procedures and legislative requirements and should be drug specific where appropriate. Training programs should be current and standardized across pharmacies within a corporation.
Table 9.
Training and education
| 9.1 | Policies, procedures and/or guidelines regarding safe handling of oral anticancer drugs should be developed, implemented and regularly revised and evaluated.6,12,29 |
| 9.2 | All members of the community pharmacy team involved in handling, or who may come in contact with oral anticancer drugs or related waste products, should have training and education that is appropriately detailed to their job function, prior to commencement of assigned duties and when new classes of oral anticancer drugs are introduced or procedures change. Standardized competency testing and regular reevaluation would be beneficial.9,10,20 |
| 9.2.1 | Initial and regular training for dispensing pharmacists and
pharmacy technicians should include but not be limited to
information about the following3,9,10,20,23:
|
| 9.2.2 | Training programs should be regularly evaluated and updated.9,10,23 |
| 9.3 | In addition to professional practice standards, when
dispensing oral anticancer drugs, community pharmacies
should provide patient education including, at a minimum,
the following3,7,8,10,12,17,20,21,24,27,30-32:
In addition, early and periodic adherence monitoring and toxicity assessment either by phone or other means of communication is important. |
Education for patients and caregivers must be provided according to professional practice standards and should include pertinent information to enable safe and effective use of OACDs in the home. This information should be assessed and reviewed at each dispensing encounter as appropriate.
Staffing
Determining appropriate pharmacy staffing levels is the responsibility of pharmacy managers and is beyond the scope of this document (Table 10). However, there are fundamental principles that should be carefully considered in determining the optimal and appropriate staffing mix or size. It is well known from the field of human factors that workplaces and work processes have a profound effect on the risk of medication incidents. Given the busy environment, frequent distractions and complex processes within a community pharmacy, pharmacy managers and individual pharmacy team members should be aware of the impact of things like prolonged periods of work without break and frequent interruptions when working with high-alert medications. Human factors experts may be called upon to assist with the design of pharmacy work processes with changes, such as segregating OACDs in a pharmacy. Finally, there are few data to confirm that the time required to provide patient education regarding OACDs may be longer than the time required for other dispensed products, and it is a reasonable area to explore. If correct, a process to evaluate current dispensing fees for OACD products, even if only for the initial dispense, should be explored.
Table 10.
Staffing
| 10.1 | Factors and work processes that influence how safely pharmacy staff perform their work, including frequent rest breaks, task rotation and opportunities for uninterrupted work space when dispensing high-alert medications (e.g., oral anticancer drugs), should be carefully considered and implemented wherever possible.9 |
| 10.2 | Community pharmacies that employ staff who are planning parenthood, are pregnant or are breastfeeding should consider policy options to limit exposure to oral anticancer drugs, including the possibility of protective reassignment. Information or counselling regarding the potential reproductive health risks from exposure to hazardous drugs should also be provided.6,9,20,27 |
Incident reporting
Quality improvement is a key component of delivering safe and high-quality care. Incident learning allows the profession to learn from both near-miss or actual events with the goal of implementing quality improvement initiatives to improve safety (Table 11). Unfortunately, mandatory incident reporting is not consistent across the provinces in Canada, which limits the opportunity to analyze aggregate incidents across the community pharmacy system as a whole. Without these data, it is difficult to identify root causes and patterns, especially given that incidents are likely to occur infrequently. In this largely data-free zone, identifying and implementing approaches to mitigate the risk of further events will remain a difficult, if not impossible, task.
Table 11.
Incident reporting
| 11.1 | All medication incidents and close calls should be reported through incident reporting systems, such as the National System for Incident Reporting (NSIR), safemedicationuse.ca, Individual Practitioner Reporting Program and/or Community Pharmacy Incident Reporting (CPhIR) system. If incidents are reported through a corporate community pharmacy incident reporting system, anonymized data should be shared by the company with ISMP Canada or another expert group to ensure opportunities to learn and reduce the risk of future events.24,33,34 |
Implementation
It is anticipated that full adoption of these recommendations may be challenging because of the complexity of some of them, the novelty with respect to established practice and the infrastructure to support implementation.35 When considering implementation pacing, the most important factor should be ensuring the safety of pharmacy staff and patients. Practically, the speed of implementation will depend on a number of factors. The more than 30 individuals and organizations that responded to the external review of this consensus guideline commented on the anticipated speed of implementation (Figure 1). While it is understood that existing legislative requirements should already be in place, the variable pacing of recommendations included in this consensus guideline will create opportunities to learn from and build on implementation efforts across the system. Given how important local factors are in determining implementation pacing, these timelines are intended to provide a starting point for discussion.
Figure 1.
Expected implementation by external review respondents (n = 32)
The external review process validated the assumption that accessible tools (e.g., pharmacy verification checklist, patient information regarding safe handling and disposal of OACDs, spill management training video) and information will be invaluable. Further consideration should be given to ensuring that this kind of support and resources are available.
Limitations
This consensus guideline was informed by both evidence and expert opinion. A systematic review of the literature was conducted, but it is recommended that literature, guidance documentation or other information released since the publication of this consensus guideline should be reviewed and considered as part of a comprehensive approach to addressing OACD safe use and handling.
In an attempt to ensure that the recommendations remained relevant, the community pharmacy sector was actively involved in every step of this consensus guideline development process. However, because we were unable to engage 100% of the community pharmacy chains in Canada and because we were unable to find an adequate mechanism to engage with independent pharmacy store owners, it is possible that there are views that have not been incorporated.
Next steps
Feedback submitted during the external review of this consensus guideline suggests that pharmacy team members would benefit from the availability of tools (e.g., verification checklists) and that patients and their caregivers would value additional information not only about the drugs they are taking but also the questions they may wish to consider asking their community pharmacy team. Organizations that have a mandate in pharmacy practice and in patient and medication safety should explore how to address these opportunities. Furthermore, an evaluation of the degree of congruence between this consensus guideline and community pharmacy practice should be undertaken at regular intervals.
Conclusion
Safe delivery of care must be the constant in an ever-changing, always improving cancer delivery system. Regardless of whether patients are treated in an outpatient environment or receive and self-administer their OACDs in the community, the safeguards should be as similar as would be considered reasonable and prudent. Similarly, whether care providers are working in a hospital, outpatient setting or community pharmacy, they have the right to know that their employer adheres to existing legislation regarding workplace health and safety and that they are taking every reasonable precaution under the circumstances to protect their occupational health and well-being. The growth in availability and use of OACDs when combined with preliminary and self-reported data from the community pharmacy sector suggests a wide degree of variation in terms of the safe use of these drugs. This finding warranted the development of a setting-specific set of recommendations that are practical and, relatively speaking, easy to follow. This consensus guideline, developed through partnership with the community pharmacy sector, demonstrates a commitment to strive for best practice. In reality, the ability to implement will be tempered by several factors, including space, business planning and the ability to pace recommendations to focus on those with the greatest impact first while working towards fuller implementation over time. Uneven pacing is expected, and as long as the perspective of addressing these recommendations is focused on a journey of quality improvement and safe care, rather than a destination, we should all be reassured that the system is moving in the right direction on behalf of patients and all Canadians.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material, DS_10.1177_1715163518767942_Appendix_1 for Recommendations for the safe use and handling of oral anticancer drugs in community pharmacy: A pan-Canadian consensus guideline by Kathy Vu, Philip Emberley, Erika Brown, Rick Abbott, Justin J. Bates, Venetia Bourrier, Kathryn Djordjevic, Julie Greenall, Mova Leung, Mark Pasetka, Louise Paquet and Heather Logan in Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material, DS_10.1177_1715163518767942_Appendix_2 for Recommendations for the safe use and handling of oral anticancer drugs in community pharmacy: A pan-Canadian consensus guideline by Kathy Vu, Philip Emberley, Erika Brown, Rick Abbott, Justin J. Bates, Venetia Bourrier, Kathryn Djordjevic, Julie Greenall, Mova Leung, Mark Pasetka, Louise Paquet and Heather Logan in Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada
Footnotes
Author Contributions:K. Vu and H. Logan wrote the initial draft of the article. K. Vu, H. Logan and E. Brown reviewed and revised the article. All authors approved the final version of the article.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests:The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding:The authors received funding from the Canadian Pharmacists Association to support this work.
References
- 1. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). pCODR pipeline tracking survey 2015. Available: https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pcodr/cancer-drug-pipeline-tracking-info-2015.pdf (accessed Feb. 15, 2017).
- 2. Griffin M, Gilbert R, Broadfield L, et al. Comparison of independent error checks for oral versus intravenous chemotherapy. J Oncol Pract 2016;12(2):168-9; e180-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Meier K, Griffith N, Goodin S, et al. Safe handling of oral chemotherapeutic agents: a European perspective. Eur J Oncol Pharm 2011;5(2):7-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). ASHP guidelines on handling hazardous drugs. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006;63(12):1172-91. [Google Scholar]
- 5. BC Cancer Agency. Safe handling standards manual. Available: http://www.bccancer.bc.ca/health-professionals/professional-resources/pharmacy/safe-handling-manual (accessed Feb. 15, 2017).
- 6. Easty A, Coakley N, Cheng R, Cividino M, Savage P, Tozer R, White R. Safe handling of cytotoxics. Report no. 16-3. Program in Evidence-Based Care, Cancer Care Ontario: 2013. December 16 Available: https://www.cancercare.on.ca/common/pages/UserFile.aspx?fileId=293473 (accessed Oct. 2, 2015). [Google Scholar]
- 7. Association paritaire pour la santé et la sécurité du travail du secteur affaires sociales (AASTSAS). Prevention guide: safe handling of hazardous drugs. 2008. Available:https://www.irsst.qc.ca/media/documents/PubIRSST/CG-002.pdf (accessed Oct. 2, 2015).
- 8. SHPA Committee of Specialty Practice in Cancer Services. SHPA standards of practice for the provision of oral chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer. J Pharm Pract Res 2007;37(2):149-52. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Workplace Health and Safety Queensland. A guide for handling cytotoxic drugs and related waste (version 3). Updated 2016. July Available:https://www.worksafe.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/88710/guide-handling-cytoxic-drugs-related-waste.pdf (accessed Feb. 17, 2017).
- 10. Government of South Australia. Cytotoxic drugs and related waste: a risk management guide for south Australian health services. 2015. Available: https://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/f8aa68004b3f6cf6a340afe79043faf0/Safe+Handling+Cytotoxic+Guidelines.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=f8aa68004b3f6cf6a340afe79043faf0 (accessed Oct. 5, 2015).
- 11. Work Safe BC. Best practices for the safe handling of hazardous drugs. 2015. November 24 Available:https://www.worksafebc.com/en/resources/health-safety/books-guides/best-practices-safe-handling-hazardous-drugs?lang=en. (accessed Feb. 17, 2017).
- 12. Canadian Association of Pharmacy in Oncology. Standards of practice for oncology pharmacy in Canada (version 2). 2009. November Available:www.capho.org/sites/default/files/page-files/StandardsofPracticeFORWEBV2Dprintable.pdf (accessed Oct. 6, 2015).
- 13. Cancer Care Nova Scotia. Pharmacy practice guide, safe handling—cancer medications in the community pharmacy. 2014. October Available:www.cancercare.ns.ca/site-cc/media/cancercare/3Safe%20Handling.pdf (accessed Oct. 5, 2015).
- 14. United States Pharmacopeia (USP). General chapter hazardous drugs—handling in health care settings. 2013. Available:www.usp.org/sites/default/files/usp_pdf/EN/m7808.pdf (accessed Oct. 8, 2015).
- 15. National Association of Pharmacy Regulatory Authorities (NAPRA). Model standards for pharmacy compounding of hazardous sterile products. 2016. November Available: http://napra.ca/Content_Files/Files/Mdl_Stnds_Pharmacy_Compounding_Hazardous_Sterile_Preparations_Nov2016_Revised.pdf (accessed Oct. 5, 2015).
- 16. Kent and Medway Cancer Network. Systemic anti-cancer therapy care pathway—guidelines on the safe use of oral anti-cancer medicines (version 5). 2012. November Available: http://www.kentmedwaycancernetwork.nhs.uk/EasySiteWeb/GatewayLink.aspx?alId=262581 (accessed Oct. 5, 2015).
- 17. Grampians Regional Palliative Care Team. Clinical guidelines for the administration of oral chemotherapeutic agents in the community setting. 2013. January Available:www.grpct.com.au/wp/wp-content/uploads/Clinical-Guidelines-for-the-Administeration-of-Oral-Chemotherapy-in-the-Community-Setting.pdf (accessed Oct. 5, 2015).
- 18. Eisenberg S. Safe handling and administration of antineoplastic chemotherapy. J Infus Nurs 2009;32(1):23-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Bartel SB. Safe practices and financial considerations in using oral chemotherapeutic agents. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64(9 Suppl 5):S8-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners Standards Committee. ISOPP standards of practice: safe handling of cytotoxics. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2007;13(Suppl):1-81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Goodin S, Griffith N, Chen B, et al. Safe handling of oral chemotherapeutic agents in clinical practice: recommendations from an international pharmacy panel. J Oncol Pract 2011;7(1):7-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). NIOSH list of antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs in health care settings, 2016. Publication number 2016-161. Available: www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/antineoplastic/pdf/hazardous-drugs-list_2016-161.pdf (accessed Oct. 7, 2015).
- 23. Worksafe Victoria. Handling cytotoxic drugs in the workplace. 2012. Available:https://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/12223/handling_cytotoxic.pdf.pdf (accessed Feb. 15, 2017).
- 24. Canadian Association of Provincial Cancer Agencies (CAPCA). Oral cancer drug therapy safe use and safe handling guidelines. 2015. Available: www.capca.ca/wp-content/uploads/En-Oral-Chemotherapy-Guideline-Final-11-May-2015.pdf (accessed Oct. 6, 2015).
- 25. North of England Cancer Network (NECN). Standards of the safe use of oral anticancer medicines. 2012. November Available:www.nescn.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/NECN-Oral-Anticancer-medicine-Policy-version-1.5.pdf (accessed Oct. 5, 2015).
- 26. Clinical Oncological Society of Australia. Guidelines for the safe prescribing, dispensing and administration of cancer chemotherapy. 2008. November Available: https://www.cosa.org.au/media/1093/cosa_guidelines_safeprescribingchemo2008.pdf (accessed Oct. 6, 2015). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 27. The Cancer Institute NSW Australia. Resource document—safe handling and waste management of hazardous drugs. 2011. September 13 Available:www.seslhd.health.nsw.gov.au/Policies_Procedures_Guidelines/Clinical/Cancer_Services/Documents/ResourceDocumentSafeHandlingandWasteManagementofHazardousDrugs.pdf (accessed Feb. 15, 2017).
- 28. Public Services Health & Safety Association. Safe handling of hazardous drugs in health care. 2013. Available: https://www.pshsa.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/PSHSA-Whitepaper-Safe-Handling-of-Hazardous-Drugs-in-Healthcare.pdf (accessed Oct. 7, 2015).
- 29. Neuss MN, Polovich M, McNiff K, et al. 2013. Updated American Society of Clinical Oncology/Oncology Nursing Society chemotherapy administration safety standards including standards for the safe administration and management of oral chemotherapy. J Oncol Pract 2013;9(2 Suppl):5s-13s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Reeves D, Kam T, Storey S. Oral antineoplastic handling at health care institutions in the United States: survey of nurses and pharmacists. Hosp Pharm 2013;48(4):308-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lester J. Safe handling and administration considerations of oral anticancer agents in the clinical and home setting. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2012;16(6):E192-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Carrington C. Safe use of oral cytotoxic medicines. Australian Prescriber 2013;36(1):9-12. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Cass Y, Connor T, Tabachnik A. Safe handling of oral antineoplastic medications: focus on targeted therapeutics in the home setting. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2017;23(5):350-78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Weingart SN, Brown E, Bach PB, et al. NCCN Task Force report: oral chemotherapy. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2008;6(Suppl 3):S1-14. Available: https://www.nccn.org/JNCCN/PDF/JNSU3_combined_Oral_Chemo_2008.pdf (accessed Oct. 6, 2015). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Weingart S, Li J, Zhu J, Morway L, Stuver S, Shulman L, Hassett MJ. US Cancer Center implementation of ASCO/Oncology Nursing Society chemotherapy administration safety standards. J Oncol Pract 2012;8(1):7-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental material, DS_10.1177_1715163518767942_Appendix_1 for Recommendations for the safe use and handling of oral anticancer drugs in community pharmacy: A pan-Canadian consensus guideline by Kathy Vu, Philip Emberley, Erika Brown, Rick Abbott, Justin J. Bates, Venetia Bourrier, Kathryn Djordjevic, Julie Greenall, Mova Leung, Mark Pasetka, Louise Paquet and Heather Logan in Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada
Supplemental material, DS_10.1177_1715163518767942_Appendix_2 for Recommendations for the safe use and handling of oral anticancer drugs in community pharmacy: A pan-Canadian consensus guideline by Kathy Vu, Philip Emberley, Erika Brown, Rick Abbott, Justin J. Bates, Venetia Bourrier, Kathryn Djordjevic, Julie Greenall, Mova Leung, Mark Pasetka, Louise Paquet and Heather Logan in Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada

