Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Oncology Letters logoLink to Oncology Letters
. 2018 Aug 7;16(4):5282–5290. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9275

Effects of cisplatin on surgically induced endometriosis in a rat model

Zhanfei Li 1,2, Huibing Liu 1, Jinghe Lang 2,✉, Guorui Zhang 2, Zhengxing He 2
PMCID: PMC6144798  PMID: 30250597

Abstract

Research has strongly suggested that the features of endometriosis serve as a precursor lesion of ovarian cancer. Cisplatin (CDDP) is the preferred drug against these cancer types. The present study investigated the effects of CDDP on surgically induced endometriosis in a rat model. Endometriosis was surgically induced by the autologous transplantation of endometrial tissue. A total of 36 model rats were randomly divided into three groups. The rats in Group 1 (control group, n=12) received no medication. The rats in Group 2 (n=12) and Group 3 (n=12) were administered 35 mg/m2 CDDP and 70 mg/m2 CDDP, respectively, every four days. All rats were treated for a total of 24 days. The growth and histologic scores of the implants were calculated. The expression of protein markers, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), aromatase P450 (P450arom), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, were assessed using immunohistochemistry, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and western blot analysis. Following CDDP treatment, the mean implant sizes were significantly reduced in Groups 2 and 3 compared with the control group (P=0.01). The mean histologic scores were also significantly lower in Groups 2 and 3. Furthermore, the protein expression of VEGF, P450arom, TGF-β and MMP-2 was significantly lower in Groups 2 and 3 when compared with the control group. A loss of hair was observed in 4 rats, which only occurred in Group 3. A dose-dependent effect was observed in the two CDDP-treated groups. In conclusion, the expression of proliferation- and angiogenesis-associated proteins was significantly lower following treatment with CDDP. CDDP caused a significant regression in the size of the endometriotic implants and induced atrophy of these lesions in rats.

Keywords: endometriosis, cisplatin, rat model, chemotherapy, treatment

Introduction

Endometriosis is a complicated and chronic disease that has been debated for decades. Although it is known to be estrogen dependent and an estrogen-inhibiting therapy has been identified to be beneficial, the exact etiopathology of endometriosis is, at present, not clear (1,2). Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and gestrinone are able to suppress the ectopic growth of endometrial tissue and are frequently used to treat endometriosis (3). However, these hormone drugs are associated with high recurrence rates and side effects, which limit their long-term use (4). There has been no optimal treatment method for endometriosis so far.

Although endometriosis is not a malignant disease, it has been reported that endometriosis and ovarian cancer are associated at the molecular level (5). The association between endometriosis and cancer is a matter of growing concern (6). With the progress of endometriosis research, histological, biochemical and epidemiological studies have identified the features of endometriosis as a precursor lesion of ovarian cancer (7–14). Genetic research has also identified gene mutations directly associated with neoplasms in endometriotic lesions, including the AT-rich interaction domain 1A, KRAS, p53 and phosphatase and tensin homolog genes (15).

Endometrioid adenocarcinoma and clear cell adenocarcinoma are the two most common pathological types of cancer resulting from the malignant transformation of endometriosis (16). Cisplatin (CDDP) is the most widely used drug in the treatment of ovarian cancer and endometrial carcinoma. CDDP-based chemotherapy is the preferred method against these cancer types (17–19). The anti-neoplastic activity of CDDP is a result of its binding to DNA in target cells to induce DNA cross-links (20). CDDP was also demonstrated to induce the downregulation of parkin-like cytoplasmic protein and apoptosis in the target cells through a p53-associated pathway; this is hypothesized to be associated with its anti-neoplastic mechanism (21).

To the best of our knowledge there has been no study conducted to demonstrate the effects of CDDP in an endometriosis rat model. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of CDDP on endometriotic tissue and the expression of proliferation- and angiogenesis-associated proteins in a rat model of endometriosis.

Materials and methods

Mouse model

A total of 36 female Sprague-Dawley rats maintained in a specific pathogen-free (SPF) facility (8 weeks old and weighing 200–235 g) were purchased from Peking Union Medical College and the Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Science (Beijing, China). The rats were sacrificed using abdominal aortic bleeding. The present study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, and the research was conducted in accordance with the institutional guidelines (22). All the rats were caged in pairs in a SPF facility, temperature 20–26°C, relative humidity 40–70%, with a 12-h light/dark cycle and ad libitum access to food and water (23).

Experimental procedures and tissue collection

All the rats underwent three consecutive surgical procedures. The rats were anesthetized via intraperitoneal administration of 3% pentobarbital sodium (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) at a dose of 35 mg/kg.

Procedure 1

In order to observe the estrous cycles of rats, vaginal smears were obtained and subject to Papanicolaou staining, as previously described (24). When the rat was in estrus, endometriosis was surgically induced according to the method described by Körbel et al with slight modifications (25). Under aseptic conditions, the rat's abdominal skin was shaved and a ventral midline incision ~5 cm long was created to open the abdominal cavity. The left uterine horn was ligated and excised, and the excised uterine horn was placed in normal saline. The serosal (outer) layer of the excised segment was removed, and the uterine segment was trimmed into a 5×5 mm2 piece. Next, the endometrial piece was sutured to the inner side of the abdominal wall, with the endometrial surface facing the peritoneal cavity. Finally, the abdominal muscles and skin were sutured.

Procedure 2

Following the surgical induction of endometriosis, all rats were allowed to recover for 4 weeks, during which period they were not administered any medication. All 36 animals survived. A second exploratory laparotomy was performed on each rat to observe the growth of the endometriotic implants. The peritoneal cavity was irrigated with 5 ml normal saline. The peritoneal fluid obtained was centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 20 min at room temperature and the solution obtained was stored at −20°C. The surface areas of the implants were measured (length [mm] × width [mm]). The endometriotic lesions were photographed, and the lesion sizes were recorded. Finally, the peritoneal cavity was closed.

Procedure 3

All rats were allowed to rest for three days following the second procedure. The 36 rats were then randomly divided into three groups of twelve rats each. There was no significant difference in the area of the implants between the groups prior to the treatment (Table I). The rats in Group 1 (n=12) served as controls and were administered 1 ml of normal saline daily via peritoneal perfusion. The rats in Group 2 (n=12) were administered 35 mg/m2 CDDP via peritoneal perfusion every 4 days. The rats in Group 3 (n=12) were administered 70 mg/m2 CDDP via peritoneal perfusion every 4 days. The skin surface areas of the rats were measured using the Meeh-Rubner equation A=Kx (W2/3/10000), where A is the skin surface area (m2), the K value is 9.1 for rats, and W is the body weight (g) (26). CDDP in the powder form (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was crushed and dissolved in normal saline. All rats were treated for a total of 24 days, which was equivalent to 6 estrous cycles. A total of 4 days after the final treatment, a third laparotomy was performed. The rats were anesthetized with 3% pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg), and the abdominal cavity was opened. Then, the implants were measured (length [mm] × width [mm]) and photographed. The peritoneal cavity was then irrigated with 5 ml normal saline and the peritoneal fluid obtained was centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 20 min at room temperature, and the solution was stored at −20°C. Finally, the implants were excised, and a portion of the endometriotic implant was fixed in formalin for histopathological examination and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The remainder of the endometriotic implant was fixed in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for further analyses.

Table I.

Treatment results and comparisons of the study groups.

Measures Group 1 (control) Group 2 (35 mg/m2 CDDP) Group 3 (70 mg/m2 CDDP) P-value
Number of rats 12 12 12
Mean surface area of implants (mm2)
Prior to medication 38.17±8.61 36.08±6.89 37.92±4.72 0.89
Following medication 47.08±8.27 18.67±2.99 6.50±2.01 0.01
Histopathological score of implants   2.50±0.67   1.67±0.65 0.90±0.57 0.01
VEGF level in peritoneal fluid (pg/ml)
Prior to medication 278.33±19.90 289.37±12.30 275.16±27.19 >0.05
Following medication 324.84±53.55 168.91±24.79 115.27±19.50 <0.05
Open in a new tab

Values are given as mean ± standard deviation. CDDP, cisplatin; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

Histopathological examination and IHC

In procedure 3, the endometriotic implants were excised following the rats being sacrificed, and then the implants were fixed in the formalin solution at 4°C for one month. Subsequently, the implants were embedded in paraffin and were sliced at 4-µm thickness. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was used for histopathological examination. Subsequently, for the IHC analysis process, the slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated in ethanol (ethanol concentrations: 100, 95, 80 and 70%); this was followed by steaming in sodium citrate buffer (cat. no. ZLI-9065; Beijing Noble Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Then, the slides were incubated in a 3% H2O2 solution at 26°C for 15 min to deactivate endogenous peroxidase and washed with phosphate-buffered saline twice for 5 min each time. Once the nonspecific antigens were blocked at 26°C for 60 min using normal goat serum (1:20; cat. no. SL038; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), the slides were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The primary antibodies included rabbit anti-rat vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; cat. no. Ab14078), aromatase P450 (P450arom; cat. no. Ab34193), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β; cat. no Ab66043) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 polyclonal antibodies (cat. no. Ab110186) (1:100; Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The slides were washed and then incubated with the horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L secondary antibodies at 26°C for 30 min (1:200; cat. no. Ab6721; Abcam); this was followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin (0.2%) using the ABC kit (Abcam) according to the manufacturer's protocol. For semi-quantitative analysis, the researcher assessing the slides was blinded to all the groups. The slides were evaluated as described previously (27). According to the percentage of cells that stained positive, the following scores from 0 to 3 were assigned: 0: <5%, 1: 5–25%, 2: 26–50%, and 3: >50%. The staining intensity of the cells was scored as follows: 0: Negative, 1: Weakly positive, 2: Moderately positive, and 3: Strongly positive. The IHC score for each rat was determined by multiplying the two scores (staining intensity and percentage of cells stained).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

The concentration of VEGF in the peritoneal fluid samples and the concentrations of VEGF, P450arom, TGF-β and MMP-2 in the endometriotic implants were assayed using ELISA kits (cat. no. K2649R, K2652R, K2763R and K2337R, respectively; R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The endometriotic implant samples were homogenized and lysed in phosphate-buffered saline at 4°C for 60 min. Whole-tissue lysates were obtained by subsequent centrifugation at 1,000 × g at 4°C for 20 min and then stored at −20°C. Double replicates of each sample were run in each assay. The lower detection limits for the ELISA kits were <1.5 pg/ml (VEGF), <1.5 U/l (P450arom), <0.1 ng/ml (MMP-2) and <1.5 pg/ml (TGF-β).

Western blot analysis

Endometriotic implant samples were homogenized using the Fluka Tissue Grinder and lysed in cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer for 20 min at 4°C (cat. no. BDIT0037; Beijing Biodragon Immunotechnologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Tissue lysates were collected and centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C. Protein levels were detected using the BCA Protein assay kit with bovine serum albumin (5 mg/ml) as the standard (cat. no. BDIT0101; Beijing Biodragon Immunotechnologies Co., Ltd.). Protein lysate samples (50 µg each) were separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel and were subsequently transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Following blocking with a 3% bovine serum albumin at 26°C for 30 min (cat. no. BF03075; Beijing Biodragon Immunotechnologies Co., Ltd.), the membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies. The primary antibodies included rabbit anti-P450arom polyclonal antibody (1:1,000; cat. no. Ab18995; Abcam), rabbit anti-VEGF polyclonal antibody (1:1,000; cat. no. Ab46154; Abcam) and mouse anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody (1:5,000; cat. no. TDY041; Beijing TDY Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), which was used as the internal standard. Then, the membranes were washed and incubated with a goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase at 26°C for 40 min (1:10,000; cat. no. S004; Beijing TDY Biotech Co., Ltd.). Immunodetection was performed based on chemiluminescence (ECL reagent; EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA. Protein-antibody complexes were quantified using the Bio-Rad Quantity One software, version 4.6.9 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 11.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Multiple comparisons were performed using a one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc Tukey's test. Non-normally distributed variables were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Side effects and survival

Following peritoneal administration of CDDP for 15 days, 4 rats in Group 3 exhibited hair loss, which continued until the last day of the medication, and a similar phenomenon was not observed in the other two groups. All rats survived until the day of sacrifice.

Growth of endometriotic tissues

The formation of cystic and vascularized endometriotic tissues was successfully induced in all 36 rats. The mean surface area of the endometriotic implants was similar in all the groups prior to treatment (P>0.05; Table I). However, at the end of the treatment, the mean area of the implants in the CDDP groups were significantly reduced, compared with that in the control group (P<0.05; Table I). The mean surface area of the endometriotic implants following medication demonstrated a significant decrease in Group 2 (from 36.08±6.89 to 18.67±2.99 mm2; P<0.05) and in Group 3 (from 37.92±4.72 to 6.50±2.01 mm2; P<0.05), but it non-significantly increased in Group 1 (from 38.17±8.61 to 47.08±8.27 mm2; P>0.05) compared with prior to medication. In addition, the decrease in the mean surface area was significantly greater in Group 3 compared with in Group 2 (P<0.05). Macroscopic images of the endometriotic implants are presented in Fig. 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Representative images of the endometriotic tissues after the medication. (A) Macroscopic view of S3. (B) Macroscopic view of S2. (C) Macroscopic view of S1. (D) Macroscopic view of S0. The arrows indicate the macroscopic appearance of the endometriotic tissues and the histopathological view of the epithelium tissues. S3: Score 3, well-preserved epithelial layer; S2: Score 2, moderately preserved epithelium; S1: Score 1, poorly preserved epithelium; S0: Score 0, no epithelium. (E) S3, (F) S2, (G) S1 and (H) S0 H&E staining at magnification ×40. (I) S3, (J) S2, (K) S1 and (L) S0 H&E staining at magnification ×200; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.

HE staining of the implant sections revealed the presence of ectopic epithelium

The growth of the epithelium in the endometrial explants was scored as follows: 3, well-preserved epithelium; 2, moderately preserved epithelium; 1, poorly preserved epithelium (occasional epithelial cells only); and 0, no epithelium. This scoring system was based on a previously published study for rat endometriosis (28). The mean histopathological score of the implants at the end of the treatment was significantly lower in Group 3 (0.90±0.57) compared with in Group 2 (1.67±0.65; P<0.05; Table I). The mean histopathological score in Group 2 was significantly lower compared with in Group 1 (2.50±0.67; P<0.05; Table I). The representative images from staining of the endometriotic implants based on the histologic assessment are presented in Fig. 1.

IHC expression of VEGF, P450arom, MMP-2 and TGF-β in endometriotic tissues

In the endometriotic tissues, the VEGF protein was present mainly in the vascular endothelial cells, and P450arom was present mainly in the glandular epithelial cells. The expression levels of the VEGF and P450arom proteins were significantly lower in Group 2 (3.00±0.74 and 3.25±0.87, respectively) and Group 3 (1.25±0.45 and 1.08±0.29, respectively) compared with in Group 1 (4.33±0.78 and 4.50±0.90, respectively; P<0.05). Furthermore, the VEGF and P450arom levels were significantly lower in Group 3 compared with in Group 2 (P<0.05). The IHC expression of VEGF and P450arom proteins in the endometriotic tissues is presented in Fig. 2A-C and D-F, respectively. The TGF-β proteins were observed in the endometrial epithelium, and the MMP-2 proteins were principally located in the mesenchymal tissue. The IHC expression of TGF-β and MMP-2 was significantly lower in Group 2 (3.01±0.60 and 2.67±0.65, respectively) and Group 3 (1.17±0.39 and 0.92±0.29, respectively) compared with in Group 1 (4.23±0.71 and 4.92±0.79 respectively; P<0.05). Furthermore, TGF-β and MMP-2 expression was significantly lower in Group 3 compared with in Group 2 (P<0.05). The IHC expression of TGF-β and MMP-2 proteins in the endometriotic tissues is presented in Fig. 2G-I and J-L, respectively. Comparison of the IHC scores of VEGF and P450arom proteins between the groups is presented in Fig. 3A and B. Comparison of the IHC scores of TGF-β and MMP-2 proteins between the groups is presented in Fig. 3C and D.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Representative images of immunohistochemical staining in the endometriotic tissues of rats. P450arom expression in glandular epithelium for (A) Group 1, (B) 2 and (C) 3; VEGF expression in vascular epithelium for (D) Group 1, (E) 2 and (F) 3; TGF-β expression in endometrium epithelium for (G) Group 1, (H) 2 and (I) 3; MMP-2 expression in mesenchymal tissue for (J) Group 1, (K) 2 and (L) 3. VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; P450arom, aromatase P450; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; MMP-2, matrix metalloproteinase 2. All the images were recorded at magnification ×200.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Comparisons of the IHC scores of VEGF, P450arom, TGF-β and MMP-2 proteins between the groups. The IHC score values of (A) VEGF, (B) P450arom, (C) TGF-β and (D) MMP-2 proteins in the endometriotic tissues were presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Control: Group 1; CDDP (35): Group 2, CDDP dosage is 35 mg/m2; CDDP (70): Group 3, CDDP dosage is 70 mg/m2. **P<0.05 vs. control, ##P<0.05 vs. group CDDP (35). IHC, immunohistochemistry; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; P450arom, aromatase P450; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; MMP-2, matrix metalloproteinase 2; CDDP, cisplatin.

VEGF level in the peritoneal fluid and VEGF, P450arom, TGF-β and MMP-2 levels in endometriotic tissues

The VEGF level in the peritoneal fluid was similar in all groups prior to administration of CDDP/saline (Table I). Following treatment, the VEGF levels in the peritoneal fluid were significantly lower in Groups 2 (168.91±24.79 pg/ml) and 3 (115.27±19.50 pg/ml) compared with Group 1 (324.84±53.55 pg/ml; P<0.05). In addition, the decrease in the level of VEGF in peritoneal fluid was significant in Group 2 (from 289.37±12.30 to 168.91±24.79 pg/ml; P<0.05) and in Group 3 (from 275.16±27.19 to 115.27±19.50 pg/ml; P<0.05), while the VEGF level non-significantly increased in Group 1 (from 278.33±19.90 to 324.84±53.55 pg/ml; P>0.05; Table I). Following treatment, the VEGF, P450arom, TGF-β and MMP-2 levels in endometriotic tissues were significantly reduced in Groups 2 (272.83±43.76 pg/ml, 70.92±8.94 U/l, 164.16±36.91 pg/ml and 3.52±0.72 pg/ml; respectively) and 3 (206.74±36.07 pg/ml, 49.16±7.90 U/l, 130.09±28.72 pg/ml and 2.22±0.57 pg/ml; respectively), compared with in Group 1 (388.61±79.41 pg/ml, 99.45±11.73 U/l, 250.63±37.69 pg/ml and 5.28±1.06 pg/ml; respectively; P<0.05; Fig. 4A-D). Furthermore, these levels were lower in Group 3 than in Group 2 following CDDP treatment. Comparison of the study groups is presented in Fig. 4A-D.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Comparisons of the VEGF, P450arom, TGF-β and MMP-2 levels in the endometriotic tissues between the examined groups. The levels of (A) VEGF, (B) P450arom, (C) TGF-β and (D) MMP-2 proteins in the endometriotic tissues were quantified with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Control: Group 1; CDDP (35): Group 2, CDDP dosage is 35 mg/m2; CDDP (70): Group 3, CDDP dosage is 70 mg/m2. **P<0.05 vs. control, ##P<0.05 vs. group CDDP (35). VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; P450arom, aromatase P450; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; MMP-2, matrix metalloproteinase 2; CDDP, cisplatin.

Western blot analysis of VEGF and P450arom

Western blot analysis of VEGF protein of the endometriotic tissues demonstrated similar results to the IHC results (Fig. 5A). The VEGF protein level in the endometriotic tissues were significantly reduced in Groups 2 and 3 compared with in Group 1 (P<0.05; Fig. 5B). Western blot analysis of P450arom protein of the endometriotic tissues also demonstrated similar results to the IHC results (Fig. 5C). The P450arom protein levels in the endometriotic tissues were also significantly reduced in Groups 2 and 3, compared with Group 1 (P<0.05; Fig. 5D). In addition, the VEGF and P450arom levels were significantly lower in Group 3 compared with in Group 2 (P<0.05; Fig. 5B and D).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

Protein levels of VEGF and P450arom in the endometriotic tissues of the model rats, as assessed by western blot analysis. Representative western blots of (A) VEGF with (B) quantification and (C) P450arom with (D) quantification. The expressions of VEGF and P450arom were downregulated in Groups 2 and 3 compared with the control group. **P<0.05 vs. Group 1, ##P<0.05 vs. Group 2. VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; P450arom, aromatase P450.

Discussion

The rat model established by autologous transplantation of endometrial tissue has been used extensively in endometriosis research (25,27,29,30). The advantages of this model are the low cost involved and the potential for genetic manipulation using transgenic animals for etiology studies (31–34). The endometriotic tissues of rats perform in a similar manner to human endometriotic tissues in organ explant culture, and the rat model is a valuable tool for the exploration of novel therapeutic medicines, permitting the research of pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis (35).

Blood vessels are necessary for the development and maintenance of endometriosis (36). Angiogenesis is essential for the development of a number of diseases, including cancer and endometriosis (37). Local angiogenesis is regulated by VEGF, which stimulates the proliferation and migration of vascular endothelial cells (38). The VEGF concentration in peritoneal fluid and endometriotic tissue has been reported to be increased in women with endometriosis (39–41).

Furthermore, TGF-β also serves important roles in the control of cellular proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis (42). Evidence demonstrated that TGF-β is produced by endometriotic lesions and could be involved in the establishment and progression of the disease (42,43). The receptors and signaling pathways of these proteins may be altered in patients with endometriosis and these proteins may therefore be potential targets for the development of therapeutic agents (42). VEGF and TGF-β are thought to be critical for the implantation and infiltration of ectopic endometrium, as well as the invasion and metastasis of ovarian tumor cells (44–47). In the present study, following the administration of CDDP, the regression of endometriotic implants was observed, along with a significant decrease in the VEGF level in the peritoneal fluid of rats. Furthermore, the protein expression of VEGF and TGF-β in the endometriotic implants also decreased significantly. These results suggest that CDDP may be involved in the regression of the endometriotic lesions via suppression of cell proliferation and inhibition of the angiogenesis of endometriotic tissue.

MMPs and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases are critical factors in the breakdown of the extracellular matrix and remodeling of endometrial tissue in endometriosis (36). The overexpression of MMP-2 has been observed in patients with endometriosis (48). MMP-2 is involved in extracellular matrix disruption in the early angiogenic stage of vascular budding and sprouting (49). In the present study, the MMP-2 protein was principally detected in the mesenchymal cells, and its IHC expression level was significantly lower in the CDDP-treated groups when compared with the control group, which was corroborated by and was more evident in the ELISA results. Therefore, the effect of CDDP's on endometriotic implants may result from its suppression of MMP-2, which results in the inhibition of the breakdown of the extracellular matrix and remodeling of endometrial tissue in the progression of endometriosis in the rats, and this effect of CDDP may be combined with its suppression of VEGF and TGF-β; however, the exact mechanism and action of this association need to be further studied.

Endometriosis is widely accepted as an estrogen-dependent condition, the progression of which is strongly affected by the level of serum estrogen (50). Several studies have reported that endometriotic tissues express aromatase and synthesize their own estrogen (1,50–53). P450arom is the key enzyme for estrogen synthesis, and catalyzes the conversion of androstenedione and testosterone to estrone and estradiol (2). As aromatases are involved in the synthesis of estrogen, the application of aromatase inhibitors is a valuable advance in the treatment of endometriosis (54–56). In the present study, P450arom was principally detected in the glandular epithelial cells of the endometriotic implants, and the expression levels of the P450arom protein were significantly lower following CDDP treatment. The results of ELISA and western blot analyses were in concurrence with these results. This inhibitory effect of CDDP on estrogen synthesis was in accordance with the function of aromatase inhibitors reported in a previous study (56). In addition, researchers have also demonstrated that CDDP chemotherapy is associated with effects on ovarian function in clinical and experimental animal studies (57,58). These results suggest that CDDP may be involved in the regression of the endometriotic tissue in an estrogen-inhibiting manner.

The histopathological examination and protein expression analyses of endometriotic tissue in the present study demonstrated that angiogenesis-associated factors, including VEGF and TGF-β, and the extracellular matrix-disrupting protein MMP-2 are all downregulated following CDDP administration. Furthermore, the expression of the P450arom protein, which is crucial for estrogen synthesis, was also suppressed by CDDP. As a result, regression of the endometriotic implants and decrease in the histological scores were observed in the CDDP-treated groups.

In the present study, a dosage of 70 mg/m2 CDDP was administered every 4 days, which corresponds with the chemotherapy dosage administered for ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer in clinical practice, a total of 4 rats in the CDDP-treated group exhibited loss of hair following treatment for 15 days. However, this was not observed in the group administered the lower dosage of 35 mg/m2 CDDP. Furthermore, a dose-dependent effect was observed in the regression and protein expression of the endometriotic tissues in the two CDDP-treated groups. These results imply that the CDDP dosage is a critical factor associated with its effects and side effects in the treatment of endometriosis and requires exploration in future studies. However, one should also take into consideration that CDDP is a drug which has a number of severe side effects, including severe kidney problems, allergic reactions, decrease immunity to infections, gastrointestinal disorders, hemorrhage and neurotoxicity (14,19,59,60); particularly for CDDP's gonadal toxicity and the concern of reproductive function preservation (61). Therefore, it may be more appropriate to administer CDDP medication to cases with endometriosis refractory at the same time in clinical practice to conventional therapies for patients who have decided not to have more children ever. Balancing the benefits and risk of CDDP and the proper indications of CDDP treatment in endometriosis requires further study.

In the present study, rats were treated for a total of 24 days, which was equivalent to 6 estrous cycles of rat. This was based on the consideration that 6 courses (which equals 6 menstrual cycles of women) of chemotherapy is the standard treatment protocol for patients with ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer in clinical practice. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to apply CDDP treatment in a surgically induced endometriosis rat model.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that CDDP causes significant regression of surgically induced endometriotic implants in model rats, and this effect is accompanied by a decrease in the expression of VEGF, P450arom, TGF-β and MMP-2 in these tissues. CDDP exhibited promising therapeutic effects in the rat endometriosis model. Further animal and clinical studies should be conducted to determine whether CDDP may be used as an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of endometriosis.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Li Yanf, Dr Li Xue Yuan, and Professor He Jun for their instructive advice and useful technical support on this research.

Funding

Peking Union Medical College Hospital financially supported this study.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

ZL and JL designed the study. ZL, HL, GZ and ZH were responsible for the collection, analysis and interpretation of data in the literature. ZL, HL and JL prepared the manuscript together and were involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, and the research was conducted in accordance with the institutional guidelines.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Nothnick WB. The emerging use of aromatase inhibitors for endometriosis treatment. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:87. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bulun SE, Imir G, Utsunomiya H, Thung S, Gurates B, Tamura M, Lin Z. Aromatase in endometriosis and uterine leiomyomata. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;95:57–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bedaiwy MA, Allaire C, Alfaraj S. Long-term medical management of endometriosis with dienogest and with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and add-back hormone therapy. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:537–548. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Surrey ES, Hornstein MD. Prolonged GnRH agonist and add-back therapy for symptomatic endometriosis: Long-term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:709–719. doi: 10.1097/00006250-200205000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Meng Q, Sun W, Jiang J, Fletcher NM, Diamond MP, Saed GM. Identification of common mechanisms between endometriosis and ovarian cancer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:917–923. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9573-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang S, Qiu L, Lang JH, Shen K, Huang HF, Pan LY, Wu M, Yang JX, Guo LN. Prognostic analysis of endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer with or without endometriosis: A 12-year cohort study of Chinese patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:241 e241–e249. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li F, Tie R, Chang K, Wang F, Deng S, Lu W, Yu L, Chen M. Does risk for ovarian malignancy algorithm excel human epididymis protein 4 and CA125 in predicting epithelial ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:258. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Augoulea A, Alexandrou A, Creatsa M, Vrachnis N, Lambrinoudaki I. Pathogenesis of endometriosis: The role of genetics, inflammation and oxidative stress. Arch Gynecol Obst. 2012;286:99–103. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2357-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Olovsson M. Immunological aspects of endometriosis: An update. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011;66(Suppl 1):S101–S104. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01045.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ogawa S, Kaku T, Amada S, Kobayashi H, Hirakawa T, Ariyoshi K, Kamura T, Nakano H. Ovarian endometriosis associated with ovarian carcinoma: A clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;77:298–304. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Somigliana E, Vigano P, Parazzini F, Stoppelli S, Giambattista E, Vercellini P. Association between endometriosis and cancer: A comprehensive review and a critical analysis of clinical and epidemiological evidence. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101:331–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vlahos NF, Kalampokas T, Fotiou S. Endometriosis and ovarian cancer: A review. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010;26:213–219. doi: 10.3109/09513590903184050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aris A. Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer: A ten-year cohort study of women living in the Estrie Region of Quebec, Canada. J Ovarian Res. 2010;3:2. doi: 10.1186/1757-2215-3-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brinton LA, Lamb EJ, Moghissi KS, Scoccia B, Althuis MD, Mabie JE, Westhoff CL. Ovarian cancer risk associated with varying causes of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:405–414. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.02.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Siufi Neto J, Kho RM, Siufi DF, Baracat EC, Anderson KS, Abrao MS. Cellular, histologic, and molecular changes associated with endometriosis and ovarian cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhao C, Wu LS, Barner R. Pathogenesis of ovarian clear cell adenofibroma, atypical proliferative (borderline) tumor, and carcinoma: Clinicopathologic features of tumors with endometriosis or adenofibromatous components support two related pathways of tumor development. J Cancer. 2011;2:94–106. doi: 10.7150/jca.2.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bookman MA. Optimal primary therapy of ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(Suppl 1):i58–i62. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.da Costa Miranda V, de Souza Fêde ÂB, Dos Anjos CH, da Silva JR, Sanchez FB, da Silva Bessa LR, de Paula Carvalho J, Filho EA, de Freitas D, Del Pilar Estevez Diz M. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with six cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer patients unsuitable for primary surgery: Safety and effectiveness. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132:287–291. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yu X, Zheng H, Chan MT, Wu WK. Modulation of chemoresponsiveness to platinum-based agents by microRNAs in cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2017;7:1769–1778. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang QE, Milum K, Han C, Huang YW, Wani G, Thomale J, Wani AA. Differential contributory roles of nucleotide excision and homologous recombination repair for enhancing cisplatin sensitivity in human ovarian cancer cells. Mol Cancer. 2011;10:24. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-10-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Woo MG, Xue K, Liu J, McBride H, Tsang BK. Calpain-mediated processing of p53-associated parkin-like cytoplasmic protein (PARC) affects chemosensitivity of human ovarian cancer cells by promoting p53 subcellular trafficking. J Biol Chem. 2011;287:3963–3975. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.314765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ingelmo JM, Quereda F, Acien P. Effect of human interferon-alpha-2b on experimental endometriosis in rats: Comparison between short and long series of treatment. Eur J Obst Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;167:190–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sun J, Jin C, Wu H, Zhao J, Cui Y, Liu H, Wu L, Shi Y, Zhu B. Effects of electro-acupuncture on ovarian P450arom, P450c17α and mRNA expression induced by letrozole in PCOS rats. PLoS One. 2013;8:e79382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Simsek Y, Celik O, Karaer A, Gul M, Yılmaz E, Koc O, Colak C, Zengin S, Aydin NE. Therapeutic efficiency of Atosiban, an oxytocin receptor blocking agent in the treatment of experimental endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286:777–783. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2390-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Körbel C, Menger MD, Laschke MW. Size and spatial orientation of uterine tissue transplants on the peritoneum crucially determine the growth and cyst formation of endometriosis-like lesions in mice. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2551–2558. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Spiers DE, Candas V. Relationship of skin surface area to body mass in the immature rat: A reexamination. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1984;56:240–243. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1984.56.1.240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ceyhan ST, Onguru O, Fidan U, Ide T, Yaman H, Kilic S, Baser I. Comparison of aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) and immunomodulators (infliximab and etanercept) on the regression of endometriotic implants in a rat model. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154:100–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Keenan JA, Williams-Boyce PK, Massey PJ, Chen TT, Caudle MR, Bukovsky A. Regression of endometrial explants in a rat model of endometriosis treated with the immune modulators loxoribine and levamisole. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:135–141. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00157-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Edwards AK, Nakamura DS, Virani S, Wessels JM, Tayade C. Animal models for anti-angiogenic therapy in endometriosis. J Reprod Immunol. 2013;97:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2012.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li Z, Liu H, He Z, Zhang G, Lang J. Effects of cisplatin and letrozole on surgically induced endometriosis and comparison of the two medications in a rat model. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2016;93:132–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stanic AK, Kim M, Styer AK, Rueda BR. Dendritic cells attenuate the early establishment of endometriosis-like lesions in a murine model. Reprod Sci. 2014;21:1228–1236. doi: 10.1177/1933719114525267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Aydin Y, Atis A, Uludag S, Tezer I, Sakiz D, Acar H, Toklu A. Remission of endometriosis by hyperbaric oxygen treatment in rats. Reprod Sci. 2011;18:941–947. doi: 10.1177/1933719111400635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mansour G, Sharma RK, Agarwal A, Falcone T. Endometriosis-induced alterations in mouse metaphase II oocyte microtubules and chromosomal alignment: A possible cause of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1894–1899. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chen QH, Zhou WD, Pu DM, Huang QS, Li T, Chen QX. 15-Epi-lipoxin A(4) inhibits the progression of endometriosis in a murine model. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1440–1447. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sharpe-Timms KL. Using rats as a research model for the study of endometriosis. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2002;955:318–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Osteen KG, Yeaman GR, Bruner-Tran KL. Matrix metalloproteinases and endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2003;21:155–164. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Griffioen AW, Molema G. Angiogenesis: Potentials for pharmacologic intervention in the treatment of cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and chronic inflammation. Pharmacol Rev. 2000;52:237–268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ozer H, Boztosun A, Acmaz G, Atilgan R, Akkar OB, Kosar MI. The efficacy of bevacizumab, sorafenib, and retinoic acid on rat endometriosis model. Reprod Sci. 2013;20:26–32. doi: 10.1177/1933719112452941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Machado DE, Abrao MS, Berardo PT, Takiya CM, Nasciutti LE. Vascular density and distribution of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor VEGFR-2 (Flk-1) are significantly higher in patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis affecting the rectum. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:148–155. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.McLaren J, Prentice A, Charnock-Jones DS, Smith SK. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentrations are elevated in peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:220–223. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Donnez J, Smoes P, Gillerot S, Casanas-Roux F, Nisolle M. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1686–1690. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.6.1686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dela Cruz C, Reis FM. The role of TGFβ superfamily members in the pathophysiology of endometriosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31:511–515. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1018166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang Q, Duan J, Liu X, Guo SW. Platelets drive smooth muscle metaplasia and fibrogenesis in endometriosis through epithelial-mesenchymal transition and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2016;428:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2016.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rein DT, Schmidt T, Bauerschmitz G, Hampl M, Beyer IM, Paupoo AA, Curiel DT, Breidenbach M. Treatment of endometriosis with a VEGF-targeted conditionally replicative adenovirus. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2687–2694. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mohamed ML, El Behery MM, Mansour SA. Comparative study between VEGF-A and CA-125 in diagnosis and follow-up of advanced endometriosis after conservative laparoscopic surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287:77–82. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2539-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Perini JA, Cardoso JV, Berardo PT, Vianna-Jorge R, Nasciutti LE, Bellodi-Privato M, Machado DE, Abrão MS. Role of vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphisms (−2578C>A, −460 T>C, −1154G>A, +405G>C and +936C>T) in endometriosis: A case-control study with Brazilians. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:117. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tamburro S, Canis M, Albuisson E, Dechelotte P, Darcha C, Mage G. Expression of transforming growth factor beta1 in nerve fibers is related to dysmenorrhea and laparoscopic appearance of endometriotic implants. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:1131–1136. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)01182-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Huang HF, Hong LH, Tan Y, Sheng JZ. Matrix metalloproteinase 2 is associated with changes in steroid hormones in the sera and peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1235–1239. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Carmeliet P. Mechanisms of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. Nat Med. 2000;6:389–395. doi: 10.1038/74651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bulun SE. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:268–279. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0804690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Burney RO, Giudice LC. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:511–519. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bulun SE, Zeitoun KM, Takayama K, Sasano H. Molecular basis for treating endometriosis with aromatase inhibitors. Hum Reprod Update. 2000;6:413–418. doi: 10.1093/humupd/6.5.413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Abu Hashim H. Potential role of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of endometriosis. Int J Womens Health. 2014;6:671–680. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S34684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ailawadi RK, Jobanputra S, Kataria M, Gurates B, Bulun SE. Treatment of endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain with letrozole and norethindrone acetate: A pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:290–296. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Abushahin F, Goldman KN, Barbieri E, Milad M, Rademaker A, Bulun SE. Aromatase inhibition for refractory endometriosis-related chronic pelvic pain. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:939–942. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.1136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Oner G, Ozcelik B, Ozgun MT, Serin IS, Ozturk F, Basbug M. The effects of metformin and letrozole on endometriosis and comparison of the two treatment agents in a rat model. Hum Rep. 2010;25:932–937. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li X, Kang X, Deng Q, Cai J, Wang Z. Combination of a GnRH agonist with an antagonist prevents flare-up effects and protects primordial ovarian follicles in the rat ovary from cisplatin-induced toxicity: A controlled experimental animal study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:16. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Blumenfeld Z, Avivi I, Linn S, Epelbaum R, Ben-Shahar M, Haim N. Prevention of irreversible chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage in young women with lymphoma by a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist in parallel to chemotherapy. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1620–1626. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Dasari S, Tchounwou PB. Cisplatin in cancer therapy: Molecular mechanisms of action. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;740:364–378. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.07.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ruggiero A, Trombatore G, Triarico S, Arena R, Ferrara P, Scalzone M, Pierri F, Riccardi R. Platinum compounds in children with cancer: Toxicity and clinical management. Anticancer Drugs. 2013;24:1007–1019. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283650bda. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chahvar ST, Al-Shawaf T, Tranquilli AL. Pharmacologic ovarian preservation in young women undergoing chemotherapy. Curr Med Chem. 2014;21:223–229. doi: 10.2174/09298673113206660293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES