Skip to main content
EPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to EPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Catal A Chem. 2016 Dec 15;425(0):183–189. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2016.09.035

Use of Selected Scavengers for the Determination of NF-TiO2 Reactive Oxygen Species during the Degradation of Microcystin-LR under Visible Light Irradiation

MIGUEL PELAEZ 1, POLYCARPOS FALARAS 2, VLASSIS LIKODIMOS 2, KEVIN O’SHEA 3, ARMAH A de la CRUZ 4, PATRICK SM DUNLOP 5, J ANTHONY BYRNE 5, DIONYSIOS D DIONYSIOU 1,*
PMCID: PMC6145490  NIHMSID: NIHMS937776  PMID: 30245578

Abstract

Although UV-induced TiO2 photocatalysis involves the generation of several reactive oxygen species (ROS), the formation of hydroxyl radicals are generally associated with the degradation of persistent organic contaminants in water. In this study, a variety of radical scavengers were employed to discriminate the roles of different ROS during visible light activated (VLA) photocatalysis using nitrogen and fluorine doped TiO2 (NF-TiO2) in the degradation of the hepatotoxin, microcystin-LR (MC-LR) in water. The addition of hydroxyl radical scavengers, methanol and tert-butyl alcohol to the reaction mixture resulted in negligible inhibition of VLA NF-TiO2 photocatalytic degradation of MCLR at pH 3.0 and only partial inhibition at pH 5.7. While hydroxyl radicals generally play the primary role in UV TiO2 photocatalysis, the minimal influence of MeOH and t-BuOH on the degradation process under these experimental conditions indicates hydroxyl radicals (OH) do not play the primary role in VLA NF-TiO2 photocatalysis. However, strong inhibition was observed in VLA NF-TiO2 photocatalytic degradation of MC-LR in the presence of superoxide dismutase, benzoquinone and catalase at pH 3.0 and 5.7 indicating O2•− and H2O2 play critical roles in the degradation process. Similar degradation rates were observed in the presence of singlet oxygen scavenger, deuterium oxide, which enhances singlet oxygen mediated processes further suggesting singlet oxygen does not play a key role in the degradation of MCLR in these system. Formic acid and cupric nitrate were added to probe the roles of the valence band holes and conduction band electrons, respectively. Under UV+vis light irradiation, almost complete inhibition of MC-LR removal is observed with NF-TiO2 in the presence of OH scavengers at pH 5.7. These results demonstrate that solution pH plays a major role in the formation and reactivities of ROS during VLA NF-TiO2 photocatalysis. The adsorption strength of the scavengers and MCLR onto NF-TiO2 as well as the speciation of the ROS as a function of pH need to be carefully considered since they also play a key role in the efficiency of the process. These results indicate the reduction of molecular oxygen by photo-generated electrons rather than hydroxyl radicals produced by oxidative reactions of photo-generated holes play a key role in the of VLA NF-TiO2 photocatalytic degradation of MC-LR.

Keywords: NF-TiO2, photocatalysis, scavenger, reactive oxygen species, hydroxyl radical, superoxide radical anion, singlet oxygen, visible light, microcystin-LR, water treatment

1. Introduction

The primary electronic processes in TiO2 photocatalysis under UV light involves the absorption of a photon with energy equal or greater to its band gap (3.2 eV for anatase and brookite TiO2 and 3.0 eV for rutile TiO2) that excites an electron to the conduction band (eCB) generating a hole in the valence band (h+VB) [1-4]. These charge carriers can migrate to the catalyst surface and initiate redox reactions where the h+VB can oxidize OH or water adsorbed at the surface to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), mainly hydroxyl radicals (OH), while eCB can be scavenged by adsorbed molecular oxygen leading to the formation of superoxide radical anions (O2•−). O2•− may further react to form singlet oxygen and hydrogen peroxide where the latter can produce OH as well [1]. Interfacial charge transfer from the photogenerated electron/holes to acceptor/donor species at the surface competes with charge recombination at surface trapping sites or in the bulk of TiO2. Recombination of the electron/hole pair results in loss of adsorbed photonic energy with release of heat by non-radiative decay processes. The generation of ROS by TiO2 photocatalysis for upon illumination by UV light along with its environmentally benign properties (i.e. non-toxicity, absence of dissolution in water, photostability) and relatively low cost, render TiO2 photocatalysis a critical option for the remediation of recalcitrant organic pollutants in water and air as well as for killing pathogenic microorganisms [2-4]. Despite the marked progress in TiO2 photocatalytic materials, their practical application is challenged by two inherent limitations of TiO2: 1) the low quantum yield i.e., the ratio of reactant molecules destroyed or the product molecules formed during the photocatalytic reaction to the quantity of absorbed photons at a given wavelength [1], which is primarily determined by the recombination of photogenerated charge carriers, and 2) the relatively poor solar light harvesting that is limited by the wide band gap of TiO2 in the UVA spectral range. Both factors undermine the photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2 and its enormous potential as an essential “green” technology for the destruction of noxious organic compounds in water and air under solar light. The modification and further development of TiO2-based photocatalytic technology towards visible light activation will provide an opportunity to develop a nanocatalysts that can absorb both UV (290-400 nm) and visible (400-700 nm) radiation to enhance the overall process efficiency and employ solar light as a renewable source of energy. Visible light activation of TiO2 has been intensively pursued recently by diverse approaches including photosensitization with dyes, modification with metal and non-metal atoms and coupling with narrow bang gap semiconductors [5-8, 9]. Nevertheless, the photocatalytic degradation mechanisms associated with VLA TiO2 photocatalysis are still ambiguous and the formation and role of different ROS are unclear.

In dye-sensitized TiO2 photocatalysis, the dye absorbs visible light instead of TiO2 and becomes photo-excited [6]. The electrons from the excited dye molecule are subsequently transferred into the conduction band of TiO2 and react with molecular oxygen to produce ROS. Recent work by Diaz-Uribe et al., suggests the formation of O2•− with tetra(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin sensitized TiO2 but no singlet oxygen was detected using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR); even though the possibility was not excluded completely [10]. Goldstein et al., concluded that oxidation of methanol was governed by the generation of surfaces holes followed by organic radical-based attack in carbon doped TiO2 photocatalysis under VLA [11]. Based on EPR studies using spin traps, Fu et al., provided evidence that OH and O2•− were responsible for the photodegradation of 4-CP by VLA activated nitrogen-doped TiO2 (N-TiO2) nanoparticles [12]. For nitrogen and sulfur doped TiO2 nanoparticles, EPR spin trapping studies suggest, O2•− and singlet oxygen were formed upon visible light illumination and were responsible of the inactivation of Escherichia coli in water [13]. A chemiluminescence technique quantified an increase of singlet oxygen production when using a composite TiO2/N-TiO2 photocatalyst under visible light irradiation for NOx decomposition compared to N-TiO2 only. As for TiO2, the characteristic 1268 nm emission of singlet oxygen was not detected upon visible light irradiation [14]. Recent developments and insights in this field highlight the need to further develop and understand the mechanisms of these photocatalyst for environmental remediation [15].

Therefore, the main objective of this study was to elucidate the formation of ROS with a visible light-activated TiO2 photocatalyst using selected chemical probe scavengers that are specific for OH, O2•−, singlet oxygen and the photogenerated electron-hole pairs. NF-TiO2 have been successfully synthesized, characterized and evaluated for its photocatalytic activity under visible light [16, 17]. The use of scavengers will contribute to a better basic understanding of the photocatalytic mechanism of NF-TiO2 towards the degradation of the cyanobacterial toxin microcystin-LR (MC-LR). MC-LR is a highly toxic, commonly found and highly persistent cyanotoxin released or secreted from cyanobacterial harmful algae blooms in surface water [18, 19]. The presence of these toxins in recreational water bodies and drinking water sources are a serious concern to the environmental and health authorities because of the significant health risk to humans and the environment.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Chemicals and NF-TiO2 synthesis

Methanol (MeOH, Tedia) and tert-butyl alcohol (TBA, Fisher) were used as hydroxyl radical scavengers. Deuterium oxide (D2O, Acros Organics) was used as singlet oxygen scavenger. For the inhibition of superoxide radical anion, 1,4-benzoquinone (98%, Sigma Aldrich) and superoxide dismutase (SOD, Sigma Aldrich) from Escherichia coli (manganese-containing enzyme, lyophilized, activity ≥1,000 units/mg protein). The electron and hole pair was scavenged with cupric nitrate (Fisher) and formic acid (88% Fisher), respectively. The nitrate salt of Cu2+ was used since adsorption of the nitrate anions onto TiO2’s surface is weak. Catalase from bovine liver was obtained from Sigma Aldrich and used as H2O2 inhibitor. L-histidine (98%, Acros Organics) was used during UV illumination to scavenge singlet oxygen and hydroxyl radicals. Nitric acid was used to adjust the pH at 3.0 in experiments dealing with acidic pH. Finally, MC-LR standard (dry solid, 500 μg) was obtained from Calbiochem. The nanotechnological approach for the synthesis of NF-TiO2 consisted in the use of a nonionic fluorosurfactant as pore template and fluorine dopant and ethylenediamine as nitrogen dopant as described in detail in [16]. The resulting nanoparticles exhibited high BET surface area (141 m2/g), high porosity (49%), small crystallite size (8.7 nm) and with a nitrogen and fluorine content of 1.5% and 4.9%, respectively [16].

2.2. Scavenger experiments

A borosilicate petri dish was used as reactor and MilliQ-grade water was adjusted to the desired pH and a specific scavenger was added into solution to obtain an initial concentration of 5000 μM except for SOD and catalase where 2 μM and 10 μM were employed (see Table 1 for selected scavengers). Then the solution was spiked with an aliquot of MC-LR standard to reach an initial concentration of 500 ± 10 μg L−1 which is equivalent to 0.5 ± 0.1 μM. Separately, an aqueous NF-TiO2 suspension was prepared, sonicated and transferred to the reactor to achieve an initial concentration of 0.5 g L−1 and a final volume of 10 mLs. The reactor was sealed with parafilm and mixed continuously during the photocatalytic reaction with visible light irradiation. To obtain visible light irradiation only, a UV block filter (UV420, Opticology) was mounted below two 15 W fluorescent lamps (Cole-Parmer) to eliminate photons below 420 nm. Samples were taken at specific periods of time and the samples were quenched with methanol, filtered (L815, Whatman) to remove the suspended nanoparticles, transferred to 0.2 ml glass inserts and placed in sample vials. MC-LR samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography (LC, Agilent Series 1100). The analytical conditions were similar to those reported by Antoniou et al., [19] but the column employed was a C18 Discovery (Supelco) column (150 × 2.1 mm, 5.0 μm particle size). The flow rate was 0.2 ml/min, the injection volume was 20 μl and the column temperature was 40 °C.

Table 1.

List of compounds selected as scavengers for OH, O2•−, 1O2, H2O2, e, and h+.

Compound Scavenger type
Formic acid h+ scavenger
Cupric Nitrate e scavenger
Methanol OH
Tertbutanol OH
D2O* 1O2
1,4-benzoquinone O2•−
Superoxide dismutase O2•−
Catalase H2O2
*

lifetime of singlet oxygen is 55 μsec in D2O compared to 4.2 μsec in H2O [34]

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. OH scavengers

To probe the role of hydroxyl radical in the photocatalytic degradation of MC-LR by VLA NF-TiO2, a number of experiments were conducted in the absence and presence of methanol or TBA at pH 3.0 and 5.7 (see Figure 1a and 1b). Methanol and TBA react rapidly with hydroxyl radical and have been used extensively as OH scavengers to determine the presence and role of hydroxyl radicals in TiO2 photocatalysis under UV light. The addition of methanol and TBA dramatically reduces the degradation rate of the targeted contaminants by conventional UV TiO2 photocatalysis indicating that OH mediated oxidation processes are the predominant pathways leading to degradation under UV irradiation [20]. The solution pH influence the overall charge on the catalyst surface increases and the speciation of the ionizable functional groups present in MC-LR. The charge on the surface and specific functional group can lead to repulsive or attractive interaction between MC-LR and the catalyst surface. Under modestly acidic conditions the catalyst surface will be positive while the carboxylate group will be negative down to approximately pH 4 and thus a strong electrostatic attraction is expected to enhanced adsorption of MC-LR in this pH range. The hydrophobic character of MC-LR also increases with solution acidity, which may also contribute to increased adsorption and degradation under acidic conditions. The addition of 5000 μM of methanol or TBA did not lead to significant inhibition of the degradation of MC-LR by VLA NF-TiO2 photocatalysis at pH 3.0, as illustrated in Figure 1a. The absence of inhibition in the presence of these scavengers suggest the minimal role of OH in the degradation of MCLR under these experimental conditions. At higher pH, 5.7, partial inhibition was observed for the degradation of MC-LR in the presence of methanol and TBA. The adsorption of MC-LR onto the photocatalyst decreased as pH increased from 3.0 to 5.7 [17]. As mentioned before, MC-LR is quite hydrophobic at pH 3.0 which can enhance strong adsorption while methanol and TBA may not compete with the ROS formed. With increasing pH the adsorption of MeoH and t-BuOH may also increase leading to lower adsorption levels for MCLR effectively reducing it degradation and thus methanol or TBA can adsorb to a higher extent on the surface of NF-TiO2. Given the high relative concentrations of scavengers and decreased adsorption of MC-LR with increasing pH these conditions may lead to the blocking of the photocatalytically active sites of NF-TiO2 and/or partial suppression of the formation of the ROS, resulting in slower MC-LR degradation. The pka of superoxide radical anion is 4.6, which lies between 3.0 and 5.7 and this can have a pronounced effect of the subsequent chemistry of the radical. For instance, negatively charged superoxide radical anion may remain at positive surface and thus inhibit disproportionation while facilitating other pathways with singlet oxygen production.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Photocatalytic degradation of MC-LR with NF-TiO2 in the absence and presence of methanol and tert-butyl alcohol as OH scavengers under visible light at a) pH 3.0 b) pH 5.7.

It is well known that when conventional TiO2 is subject to UV light illumination, the primary formation route of OH is based on the oxidation of OH or water at the TiO2 surface through the highly oxidizing and delocalized h+VB that migrated to the catalyst surface [1,3,4]. Also, the formation of H2O2 (that occurs upon the reduction of molecular oxygen acting as an electron acceptor) can also generate OH via homolytic scission in a secondary reaction pathway [1] although it is highly influenced by pH. In the case of non-metal doped TiO2, in particular nitrogen-doped TiO2, it has been proposed that the introduction of single N hetero-atoms in the TiO2 lattice (substitutional or interstitial) induces localized electronic states within the titania band gap and selectively promotes electrons from these states to the conduction band upon visible light irradiation [21]. Under this condition, the photogenerated holes in the localized intra-gap energy states may not have a positive enough electrochemical reduction potential to generate hydroxyl radicals at the surface of the catalyst from oxidation of absorbed water or hydroxyl groups. However, the formation of OH radicals through the reaction of photoinduced e and/or O2•− with H2O2 (H2O + H+ + eCBOH + H2O; H2O2 + O2•−OH+ OH + O2) as secondary reaction pathways should not be discarded (see section 3.2 for O2•− and H2O2 formation). Under visible light irradiation, the direct photolysis of H2O2 to produce OH can be neglected due to the small molar absorption coefficient (< 1 M−1 cm−1 above 300 nm) [22]. Nevertheless, the formation of OH from H2O2 (with eCB) is expected to be appreciably slower than that through surface holes at least under UV excitation according to the corresponding reduction potentials (H2O2/ OH is about 0.87 V (vs NHE) [23] and H2O/OH is about 2.27 V (vs NHE) [13] at pH 7.0 because of the multiple steps and competing pathways required to produce HO• from O2•−.

Wang et al., [20] reported the degradation rate of methyl orange by the visible light photocatalysis using nitrogen-doped titania nanobelts was not inhinited in the presence of methanol. The authors suggest that, the generation of electrons and O2•− was the rate limiting step for visible light N-doped TiO2 photocatalysis. Mrowetz et al., [24] showed that N-doped TiO2 photocatalysis under visible light irradiation unlike UV-mediated TiO2 photocatalysis is not capable of oxidizing HCOO. The lack of formic acid oxidation suggest free or adsorbed OH radicals are not produced under the experimental conditions tested. While water splitting with carbon doped TiO2 under visible light has been reported the results are subject to controversy based on photo electrochemical studies [25].

The second order rate constant of TBA and methanol with OH has been reported to be 4.8 × 108 and 8.3 × 108 M−1 s−1, respectively [26]. Literature values for the second order rate constant for MC-LR and OH range from 1.0-2.3 (±0.1) × 1010 M−1 s−1 [27]. If hydroxyl radicals were the primary species leading to the degradation of MC-LR during VLA NF-TiO2 photocatalysis, addition of TBA or methanol should inhibit the degradation. The minimal level of inhibition observed upon addition of hydroxyl radical indicates the hydroxyl-radical-based oxidation pathway does not play a significant role in the degradation of MC-LR with NF-TiO2 under visible light irradiation (at the conditions tested) although the OH formation can undergo multistep process through reduction of molecular oxygen to O2•−, disproportionation to H2O2 and subsequent reduction to OH.

3.2. O2•− scavengers

SOD and 1,4-benzoquinone were used as scavengers to probe the formation and role of O2•− during VLA NF-TiO2 photocatalysis. The inhibition of MC-LR degradation increases with increasing SOD from 2 to 10 μM at pH 3.0, illustrated in Figure 2a. Significant inhibition of MC-LR was also observed in the presence of 1,4-benzoquinone. These results suggest that O2•− is an important oxidant in the VLA NF-TiO2 photocatalysis. The inhibition of the MC-LR photocatalytic degradation was more pronounced with the addition of SOD and catalase. SOD catalyzes the conversion of O2•− into H2O2 and oxygen, while catalase converts H2O2 to water and oxygen. H2O2 is produced by SOD, which can lead to the formation of OH (see section 3.1) in the absence of catalase although this could be a very low yield pathway. At pH 5.7, complete inhibition was observed with 1,4-benzoquinone according to Figure 2b. Higher inhibition with SOD and catalase was also observed at pH 5.7 compared to pH 3.0 The pKa of 1,4-benzoquinone is 9.9 and 11.4 [28] so at both pH values the interaction with NF-TiO2 was low. The isoelectric point of SOD occurs at pH 5.0 [29] thus in solution above pH 5.0, SOD has an overall negative charge, which may enhance interaction with the positively charged surface of NF-TiO2 at pH 5.7. In addition, the pKa for superoxide is 4.6 thus at pH below 4.6 the neutral form is dominant (HO2) and above pH 4.6 the anionic form (O2•−) is dominant.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Photocatalytic degradation of MC-LR with NF-TiO2 in the absence and presence of SOD and 1,4-benzoquinone as O2•− scavenger and catalase as H2O2 scavenger under visible light at a) pH 3.0 and b) pH 5.7.

The reduction potential of conduction band electrons in NF-TiO2 is considered equivalent to that of undoped TiO2 [13, 30] and capable of reducing molecular oxygen at the surface of the catalyst to O2•− under visible light irradiation. The superoxide radical anion can act as oxidizing species for the degradation of MC-LR since the electrochemical oxidation potential (EOP) of O2•− is 0.57 ±0.01 V [31]. The initial degradation of MC-LR was slower under visible light compared to UV or solar light, which is consistent with the fact that VLA yields primarily O2•− with an EOP = 0.57 V compared to OH produced under UV and solar excitation with an EOP = 2.8 V. Further reduction of O2•− with eCB can produce H2O2 or O2•− that could be further oxidized to form singlet oxygen. The production of O2•− has been detected using EPR during VLA N-TiO2 photocatalysis [21]. According to recent EPR analysis [32], NF-TiO2 comprises similar paramagnetic N centers to those of N-TiO2 [21], with concentrations increasing dramatically upon visible light illumination, verifying the formation of localized intra-gap states above the valence band of TiO2. These results indicate the conduction band electrons localized at N-centers in photo-excited NF-TiO2 can yield O2•− via electron transfer to surface adsorbed O2.

3.3. 1O2 scavengers

To further explore the role of singlet oxygen in VLA NF-TiO2 photocatalysis and eliminate the problems with competitive adsorption of scavengers, experiments were conducted with deuterium oxide (D2O) as the solvent. Singlet oxygen reactions are dramatically accelerated in D2O compared to H2O because the lifetime of singlet oxygen is 55 μsec compared to 4.2 μsec in H2O [33]. The photocatalytic degradation of MC-LR was slightly higher in D2O compared to H2O buffered at pH 7.4 as illustrated in Figure 3. Similar degradation of MC-LR was observed with buffered H2O and buffered D2O (pH 7.4) indicating minimal interaction of NF-TiO2 with the ions from the buffered solution. At pH 7.4, electrostatic repulsion between negatively charged MC-LR and negatively charged NF-TiO2 is expected to reduce the MC-LR adsorption but still ~30% degradation was observed. This indicates that reactive oxygen species are formed under D2O as well but the results provide no direct indication on the presence of singlet oxygen. The formation of singlet oxygen is associated with the transformation of superoxide anion radicals. The redox potential of 0.34 V vs NHE indicates that the relation (O2•−/1 O2) is favored thermodynamically [13], but the formation of singlet oxygen is limited to the back electron transfer of an electron in O2•− to valence band holes. However, photogenerated holes are expected to remain localized in intra-gap energy states after charge separation in N-TiO2 [21], which would limit the interaction with O2•− and the probability for the formation of singlet oxygen.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Photocatalytic degradation of MC-LR with buffered H2O and D2O with NF-TiO2 under visible light.

3.4 e and h+ scavengers

In order to determine the involvement of eCB and h+ in NF-TiO2 photocatalysis under visible light, cupric nitrate and formic acid were used as eCB and h+ scavengers, respectively. Rengaraj and Li employed formic acid as a hole scavenger to enhance the photocatalytic reduction reaction of Bi3+-doped TiO2 under UV light [34]. It can also inhibit the process by reacting with hydroxyl radicals and by compete adsorption with MC-LR at the surface where ROS are produced. The inhibition of MC-LR in the presence of each scavenger is shown in Figure 4a and 4b and compared to control at pH 3.0 and 5.7. Under both pH values, partial inhibition of MC-LR degradation was observed. For the case of Cu2+, the adsorption of the transition metal onto NF-TiO2 decreased the reduction of oxygen by the conduction electrons and partially inhibited the formation of ROS and the removal of MC-LR. Chen et al., observed a hindering effect of Cu2+ ions on the photodegradation of three dyes using TiO2 dispersions under visible light irradiation. The formation of ROS were blocked, based on electron spin resonance analysis, indicating that the adsorbed ions can alter the electron-transfer pathway and suppress the degradation of the dye [35]. Moreover, it is known that Cu2+ can be reduced by superoxide radical anion [36]. The competition for superoxide radical anions between Cu2+ and MC-LR can lead to a reduction in the oxidation of the cyanotoxin. The addition of formic acid at pH 3.0 and buffered pH 5.7 is anticipated to prolong the lifetime of electrons and consequently produce more O2•−, however inhibition of the photo-oxidation process was observed. VLA NF-TiO2 photocatalysis does not generate a valence band hole that can lead to the formation of OH. Therefore, the partial inhibition may result from the competition for adsorption between MC-LR and formic acid (pKa of 3.7) since formic acid can also interact with OH with a rate constant kHA of 1.3 × 108 M−1 s−1 and kA- of 3.2 × 109 M−1 s−1 [37] but high degradation of MC-LR was still observed indicating a lack of interaction with any potentially available OH.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effect of Cu(NO3)2 and formic acid addition as e and h+ scavenger, respectively, in NF-TiO2 photocatalysis of MC-LR under visible light at a) pH 3.0 and b) pH 5.7.

Scheme 1 shows a proposed mechanism of NF-TiO2 photoactivation under visible light. From the findings obtained in this investigation, the mechanism of ROS formation of the synthesized photocatalyst under visible light is inferred to proceed via the reduction of molecular oxygen by visible light-excited electrons leading to the generation of superoxide radical anions and the intermediates formed and not via the generation of hydroxyl radicals by h+ in the localized N-centers of NF-TiO2. Superoxide is critical to the degradation process through disproportionation to H2O2 and the formation of HO. The production of HO under VLA is relative slow and in low yield, but localized at surface where adsorbates (such as MC-LR) are degraded. Adsorption strength plays a key role in the efficiency of the process.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Proposed mechanism of NF-TiO2 photoactivation under visible light.

3.5 OH formation under UV+vis light

Figure 5 shows the photocatalytic degradation of MC-LR under UV+vis light in the absence and presence of methanol and L-histidine. Significantly faster removal of MC-LR was obtained with NF-TiO2 only under UV+vis compared to visible light at pH 5.7. In this case, the UV+vis light source included UV radiation with high intensity peaks at 310 and 365 nm [15]. The photoactivation of NF-TiO2 with UV light contributed to the enhanced performance of the photocatalyst towards the degradation of MC-LR. The possible generation of OH under UV+vis light with NF-TiO2 could be the responsible of this enhancement. In this case, high inhibition with methanol and L-histidine was observed at pH 5.7. L-histidine is known to be a quencher for both 1O2 and OH with a pKa of 6.04 [38]. The second order rate constant of L-histidine with OH is 5.0 ×109. Contrary to the results obtained under visible light, high inhibition of MC-LR was obtained in the presence of both scavengers. This indicates the generation of hydroxyl radicals as the primary reactive oxygen species with NF-TiO2 under UV+vis light.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Photocatalytic degradation of MC-LR with NF-TiO2 under UV+vis light and the scavenger effect of OH with methanol and L-histidine.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the mechanism of NF-TiO2 radical formation under visible light with selected scavengers for the degradation of MC-LR in water was systematically investigated. No direct indication for the presence of holes and OH in NF-TiO2 was obtained with formic acid and methanol, respectively, under visible light at pH 3.0 and 5.7. The formation of O2•− and H2O2 with NF-TiO2 was established from the high inhibition of MC-LR degradation with superoxide dismutase and catalase at both pH values. Singlet oxygen formation is conditioned to further oxidation of O2•− with delocalized holes, whose formation could be limited in NF-TiO2. When employing UV+vis light, it was found that OH is the primary ROS formed with NF-TiO2 due to the high inhibition on the degradation of MC-LR with methanol and L-histidine, two OH scavengers, at pH 5.7. Overall, pH plays a major role in the ROS formation during NF-TiO2 photocatalysis under visible light for the degradation of MC-LR. The affinity of the scavenger with NF-TiO2 and MC-LR as well as the disproportionation of the ROS needs to be considered. Nevertheless, the mechanism of radical formation with NF-TiO2 under visible light indicates that the ROS generated proceed via the oxygen reduction pathway rather than the oxidative reactions of photogenerated holes that can produce hydroxyl radicals. This study provides essential information for understanding and improving the detailed reaction mechanism underlying the photocatalytic activity of NF-TiO2 under visible and solar light towards the degradation of cyanotoxins and other contaminants of emerging concern in water.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by a NSF Collaborative Research (US-Ireland) (Number CBET-1033317) and the European Commission (Clean Water - Grant Agreement number 227017). Clean Water is a Collaborative Project co-funded by the Research DG of the European Commission within the joint RTD activities of the Environment and NMP Thematic Priorities/FP7.

Footnotes

Disclaimer: The research described in this article has not been subjected to the Agency’s required peer and policy review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred.

References

  • 1.Hoffmann MR, Martin ST, Choi W, Bahnemann DW. Chem Rev. 1995;95:69–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Turchi S, Ollis DF. J Catal. 1990;122:178–192. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bhatkhande S, Pangarkar VG, Beenacker A. J of Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2001;77:102–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fujishima, Rao TN, Tryk DA. J Photochem Photobiol, C. 2000;1:1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Asahi R, Morikawa T, Aoki K, Taga Y. Science. 2001;293:269–271. doi: 10.1126/science.1061051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kumar SG, Devi LG. J Phys Chem A. 2011;115(46):13211–41. doi: 10.1021/jp204364a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li XZ, Li FB. Environ Sci Technol. 2001;35:2381–2387. doi: 10.1021/es001752w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ghows N, Entezari MH. Ultrason Sonochem. 2011;18:629–634. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pelaez M, Nolan NT, Pillai SC, Seery MK, Falaras P, Kontos AG, Dunlop PSM, Hamilton JWJ, Byrne JA, O’Shea K, Entezari MH, Dionysiou DD. Appl Catal B: Environmental. 2012;125:331–349. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Diaz-Uribe CE, Daza MC, Martínez F, Páez-Mozo EA, Guedes CLB, Di Mauro E. Journal of Photochem & Photobiol A. 2010;215:172–178. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Goldstein S, Behar D, Rabani J. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112:15134–15139. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fu H, Zhang L, Zhang S, Zhu Y. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:3061–3065. doi: 10.1021/jp055279q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rengifo-Herrera JA, Pierzchala K, Sienkiewicz A, Forro L, Kiwi J, Pulgarin C. Appl Catal, B. 2009;88:398–406. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kang IC, Zhang Q, Yin S, Sato T, Saito F. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42(10):3622–3626. doi: 10.1021/es702932m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Banerjee S, Pillai SC, Falaras P, O’Shea KE, Byrne JA, Dionysiou DD. J Phys Chem Lett. 2014;5:2543–2554. doi: 10.1021/jz501030x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pelaez M, de la Cruz AA, Stathatos E, Falaras P, Dionysiou DD. Catalysis Today. 2009;144:19–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pelaez M, de la Cruz AA, O’shea K, Falaras P, Dionysiou DD. Water Research. 2011;45:3787–3796. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.de la Cruz AA, Antoniou MG, Hiskia A, Pelaez M, Song W, O’Shea KE, He X, Dionysiou DD. Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry. 2011;11:19–37. doi: 10.2174/187152011794941217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Antoniou MG, Shoemaker JA, de la Cruz AA, Dionysiou DD. Toxicon. 2008;51:1103–1118. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang J, Tafen DN, Lewis JP, Hong Z, Manivannan A, Zhi M, Li M, Wu N. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:12290–12297. doi: 10.1021/ja903781h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Livraghi S, Paganini MC, Giamello E, Selloni A, Di Valentin C, Pacchioni G. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:15666–15671. doi: 10.1021/ja064164c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kim S, Park H, Choi W. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:6402–6411. doi: 10.1021/jp049789g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hirakawa T, Nosaka Y. Langmuir. 2002;18:3247–3254. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mrowetz M, Balcerski W, Colussi AJ, Hoffmann MR. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108(45):17269–17273. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Murphy AB. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells. 2008;92:363–367. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Motohashi N, Saito Y. Chem Pharm Bull. 1993;41:1842–1845. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Song W, Xu T, Cooper WJ, Dionysiou DD, de la Cruz AA, O‘Shea KE. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(5):1487–1492. doi: 10.1021/es802282n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nivinskas H, Staskeviciene S, Sarlauskas J, Koder RL, Miller A-F, Cenas N. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2002;403:249–258. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9861(02)00228-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Banci L, Bertini I, Turano P. Eur Biophys J. 1991;19:141–146. doi: 10.1007/BF00185454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hirakawa T, Nosaka Y. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112:15818–15823. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rao PS, Hayon E. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1973;51(2):468–473. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(73)91280-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pelaez M, Falaras P, Likodimos V, Kontos AG, de la Cruz AA, O’Shea K, Dionysiou DD. Appl Catal, B. 2010;99:378–387. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rodgers MAJ. Activated oxygen. In: Bensasson RV, Jori G, Land EJ, Truscott TG, editors. Primary Photo-Processes in Biology and Medicine. Vol. 85. 1984. pp. 181–195. (NATO ASI Series A, Life Sciences). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rengaraj S, Li XZ. Chemosphere. 2007;66(5):930–938. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chen C, Li X, Ma W, Zhao J, Hidaka H, Serpone N. J Phys Chem B. 2002;106(2):318–324. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Benzi Gianni. Peroxidation, Energy Transduction and Mitochondria during Aging. John Libbey Eurotext FR; 1990. The modulating and toxic significance of endocellular peroxidations; p. 56. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Leitner NKV, Dore M. Journal of Photochem & Photobiol A. 1996;99:137–143. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ahmed A, Yao P-C, Brant AM, Peter GJ, Harper AA. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(1):125–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES