Abstract
Knee arthroscopy is the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedure in the United States. Indications have grown exponentially since the procedure was first popularized by Watanabe and Jackson. Treatment of meniscal tears is the most common reason for knee arthroscopy, with approximately 700,000 arthroscopic partial meniscectomies performed annually. Other indications include assistance for cruciate ligament reconstruction, osteochondral lesions, removal of loose bodies, synovectomy, and septic arthritis. Arthroscopy is accomplished with the use of two small incisions on either side of the patella at the anterior aspect of the knee. An arthroscope is inserted through one incision and used to view the image on a monitor, while the second incision is employed for instrumentation.
An examination with the patient under anesthesia should always be performed prior to the initiation of the procedure. The patient is positioned with the knee flexed and a lateral post secured to the side of the bed. Standard anteromedial and anterolateral portals are made, and an arthroscope is introduced through the anterolateral portal. Diagnostic arthroscopy is performed in a systematic fashion. Meniscal tears and other pathology are identified. With use of an arthroscopic probe, the features of the meniscal tear are determined. Arthroscopic punches and shavers are used to debride torn portions back to a stable rim.
Knee arthroscopy is a highly effective procedure. Outcomes after partial medial meniscectomy are good to excellent in 80% to 100% of patients. A recent cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated that knee arthroscopy is more cost-effective than coronary artery bypass surgery or total knee arthroplasty.
Acknowledgments
Note: Images in the video identified as having been published previously were reproduced, with permission, from Elsevier.
Footnotes
Published outcomes of this procedure can be found at: N Engl J Med. 2013 May 2;368(18):1675-84.
Disclosure: The author did not receive payments or services, either directly or indirectly (i.e., via his institution), from a third party in support of any aspect of this work. He, or his institution, has had a financial relationship, in the thirty-six months prior to submission of this work, with an entity in the biomedical arena that could be perceived to influence or have the potential to influence what is written in this work. The author has not had any other relationships, or engaged in any other activities, that could be perceived to influence or have the potential to influence what is written in this work. The complete Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest submitted by authors are always provided with the online version of the article.
Reference
- 1.Katz JN, Brophy RH, Chaisson CE, de Chaves L, Cole BJ, Dahm DL, Donnell-Fink LA, Guermazi A, Haas AK, Jones MH, Levy BA, Mandl LA, Martin SD, Marx RG, Miniaci A, Matava MJ, Palmisano J, Reinke EK, Richardson BE, Rome BN, Safran-Norton CE, Skoniecki DJ, Solomon DH, Smith MV, Spindler KP, Stuart MJ, Wright J, Wright RW, Losina E. Surgery versus physical therapy for a meniscal tear and osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med. 2013. May 2;368(18):1675-84. Epub 2013 Mar 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]