The authors have corrected two mistakes in the original article. First, a data point has been added at x = 5 mW, which was missing from the plot in Figure 1G. This does not alter the results, as the statistical analysis in the original article is correct because it included this data point. Second, there is an error in the p value reported in Figure S2E. The actual value is p = 0.33 (signed-rank test). The value quoted in the original article was p = 0.18, so the interpretation of the data remains the same (i.e., there is no statistically significant effect of the optical stimulation). The p value has been updated in the main text, Figure S2 legend, and Table S1. The article has now been corrected online. The authors apologize for the errors and regret any confusion these mistakes may have caused.
