Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 7.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Jul 18;52(15):8838–8847. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01754

Traditional Tibetan Medicine Induced High Methylmercury Exposure Level and Environmental Mercury Burden in Tibet, China

Maodian Liu †,, Yipeng He †,, Zofia Baumann , Chenghao Yu , Shidong Ge , Xuejun Sun §,, Menghan Cheng , Huizhong Shen ǁ, Robert P Mason , Long Chen #,, Qianggong Zhang §,, Xuejun Wang †,*
PMCID: PMC6147262  NIHMSID: NIHMS985351  PMID: 30019578

Abstract

Highly elevated concentrations of total mercury (THg) and methylmercury (MeHg) were found in the municipal sewage in Tibet. Material flow analysis supports the hypothesis that these elevated concentrations are related to regular ingestion of Hg-containing Traditional Tibetan Medicine (TTM). In Tibet in 2015, a total of 3,600 kg of THg was released from human body into the terrestrial environment as a result of TTM ingestion, amounting to 45% of the total THg release into the terrestrial environment in Tibet, hence substantially enhancing the environmental Hg burden. Regular ingestion of TTM leads to chronic exposure of Tibetans to inorganic Hg (IHg) and MeHg, which is 34 to 3,000-fold and 0 to 12-fold higher than from any other known dietary sources, respectively. Application of a human physiology model demonstrated that ingestion of TTM can induce high blood IHg and MeHg levels in the human body. Moreover, 180 days would be required for the MeHg to be cleared out of the human body and return to the initial concentration i.e. prior to the ingestion of 1 TTM pill. Our analysis suggests that high Hg level contained in TTM could be harmful to human health and elevate the environmental Hg burden in Tibet.

Abstract Art

graphic file with name nihms-985351-f0001.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Human activities have fundamentally altered the global biogeochemical cycle of the toxic element mercury (Hg) in the environment, which has been considered as one of the chemicals to cause serious public health problems worldwide.15 Chemical form, dose and exposure rate of Hg represent the most significant factors that are known to trigger toxic effects in the human body.6, 7 Methylmercury (MeHg) is one of the most toxic forms of Hg. It is a potent neurotoxin that biomagnifies in food-webs,8 and can cause long-term developmental delays in children and impaired cardiovascular health in adults.6, 7, 9 Chronic exposure to MeHg is of major concern for human health, and consumption of marine fish has been claimed the dominant exposure route to people globally.1012 Nevertheless, in some regions of Asia, MeHg exposure routes remain highly debated. Recent studies have concluded that rice consumption in some Asian regions could be a significant dietary source of MeHg to people.10, 13, 14

The Tibetan Plateau, generally labeled as “the third pole of the world” due to its very high altitude (average 4,500 meters), is recognized as the cleanest (i.e. not impacted by chemical pollution) region in China.15 However, in contrast to that notion, a recently published article showed that per capita releases of Total Hg (THg, refers to all forms of Hg) and MeHg from the municipal sewage in Tibet were higher than anywhere else in China.16 Traditional Tibetan Medicine (TTM, see the abstract art), is produced by using a complex herbal and mineral pharmacopeia, and it is commonly used by Tibetans. The very high THg concentrations in TTM have been shown in past publications and it is known that pharmacists intentionally add heavy metals, including Hg, into medicinal products with a belief of their therapeutic effects.1719 For over a thousand years. Tibetan nobility have ingested daily Hg-containing pills, and currently common people of Tibet have also access to these formerly very expensive pills. Thus far, only THg concentration in TTM have been reported, while there have been no reports on the levels of MeHg in the TTM. Therefore, toxicity risks associated with the human exposure to MeHg from ingested TTM have not been evaluated and remain unknown. Furthermore, the environmental fate of THg, including its inorganic and organic forms that are excreted from human bodies, have also remained unknown.

The aim of the present study was to understand the life cycle of Hg (including THg and MeHg) in TTM from ingestion by human body to its final release into the terrestrial environment of Tibet. Therefore in this study, we have measured THg and MeHg concentrations in seven commonly used TTMs that are available on the market. We have also determined human exposure levels to MeHg, THg and to eight other toxic heavy metal(loid)s i.e. lead (Pb), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), chromium (Cr), Arsenic (As), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co) and cadmium (Cd) to Tibetan inhabitants who regularly ingests any of the TTMs that are available on the market. A physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was used to quantify MeHg and inorganic Hg (IHg) cycles in the human body upon ingestion of the TTM. Finally, we have applied a material flow analysis of THg and MeHg to quantify the fate of THg and MeHg excreted from human body in the environment in Tibet.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Sample Collection.

As was done previously, TTM products were sampled from local Tibetan pharmacies, and sampling was conducted during the summer of 2016 17, 18. We ensured that all TTMs evaluated in the present study represented local Tibetan products. Nowadays, there are 11 registered companies producing TTM in Tibet (China Food and Drug Administration, http://www.sda.gov.cn/). The details on production and consumption of TTM are however not publically available. Based on previous studies and our personal communication with the local Tibetan pharmacies during the sampling,17, 1922 there are seven commonly used TTM types, which are produced by 8 major factories, hence we have focused on these products in the present study. These TTMs are: Renqing Mangjue, Qishiwei Zhenzhu Wan, Ershiwuwei Zhenzhu Wan, Zuozhu Daxi, Renqing Changjue, Zhenzhu Qishi Wan, and Shiliu Jianwei San. We also compared concentrations in the same medicine type i.e. Renqing Mangjue, Qishiwei Zhenzhu Wan and Ershiwuwei Zhenzhu, which were produced by two different companies. Three pills from each type of TTM were analyzed in triplicate (sample size n=3). More information on these medicinal products is provided in Table S1, Supporting Information (SI).

2.2. Analytical Methodology.

All samples were freeze-dried and homogenized into fine powder. THg and MeHg concentrations of TTM products were analyzed in the Ministry of Education Laboratory of Earth Surface Process in Peking University and Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research of Chinese Academy of Sciences, respectively. The method of the THg extraction in the medicine followed Sallon et al.17 Each sample was digested in a solution of aqua regia (HNO3 (69%) : HCl (38%) = 1:3 vol./vol.) in Teflon vessels at 130 °C for 20 min in a graphite oven. Analysis of THg followed the U.S. EPA Method 1631.16, 23 THg was oxidized to Hg(II) by BrCl overnight, neutralized by hydroxylamine hydrochloride [NH2OH·HCl] for at least 5 minutes to keep it free from halogens after incubation, and then reduced to Hg0 by SnCl2. Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry (CVAFS) was used to measure Hg0. The detection limit for THg was 0.1 ng/L and spike recoveries for ambient THg ranged from 90% to 106%.

MeHg was extracted by two methods and comparison was made between them to determine any artifact MeHg formation during the two distinct processes.24 For Method 1, samples were leached with 4.5 M HNO3 in a water bath at 60 °C for 12 h, following previous studies.16, 25 For Method 2, as previously reported,26, 27 samples were leached with H2SO4/KBr/CuSO4 at room temperature, followed by CH2Cl2 extraction and back extraction into water. Extracting solutions from Method 1 were neutralized with KOH. All the extracting solutions were buffered with acetate, derivatized into methylethylmercury with sodium tetraethyl borate, and quantified using Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry (GC-AFS).16, 25, 28 Due to extremely high THg concentration, digests for MeHg were diluted in a range of 104 - 106-fold to avoid damaging the analytical equipment.17 The detection limit for MeHg was 0.01 ng/L and recoveries for ambient MeHg ranged from 70% to 120%.

Other metal(loid)s i.e. Pb, Cu, Zn, As, Cr, Ni, Co, Cd and Selenium (Se), were analyzed at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Samples were digested by HNO3/HClO4/HF mixture inside Teflon vessels at 140 °C in the graphite oven for 24 to 48 h. All resulting solutions were dried and dissolved in dilute HNO3 (5% vol./vol.).29 Pb, Cu, Zn and As were measured by Inductively Coupled Plasma–Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP–OES), and Cr, Ni, Co, Cd and Se were measured by Inductively Coupled Plasma–Mass Spectrometry (ICP–MS). The detection limits were 0.1 to 0.3 μg/L for Pb, Cu, Zn and As, and 0.002 to 0.017 μg/L for Cr, Ni, Co, Cd and Se, respectively. The recoveries of the 9 metal(loid)s spiked into samples ranged from 83% to 108%. Except Se, concentrations of all metals used in the present study were above the detection limits. All concentrations are provided on wet weight basis. Percentages of water contents of the TTM in this study ranged from 0 to 13%.

2.3. Dietary Intake.

Probable daily intake (PDI) values for Hg (including THg and MeHg) and the remaining 8 heavy metal(loid)s (Pb, Cu, Zn, As, Cr, Ni, Co and Cd) were applied to evaluate the exposures due to TTM intake by an individual Tibetan population. This method has been extensively used to estimate dietary intake of chemical contaminants. Daily human exposure to given contaminant was calculated based on known contaminant concentrations in various foods and on food intake rates.30, 31 This calculation is based on the assumption that contaminant exposures from other routes such as ambient atmosphere, dental amalgam fillings or dermal exposure are negligible.13, 3133 The calculation method is described below:

PDIi=I×Cibw (1)

where PDIi is the PDI of contaminant i due to intakes of TTMs in Tibet (μg·kg−1·day−1); I is the ingestion rate of the medicine; Ci is the concentration of contaminant i (μg/g); and bw is body weight (kg, set as 60 kg).13, 34

The detailed production and consumption information of each TTM is not well documented. Hence, to gain a realistic image of human exposure to THg and MeHg from ingestion of TTM, we set TTM ingestion rates as 0.2, 1 and 2 g·day−1, based on the recommended doses of different TTM products (Table S1, SI). Our best estimate of the average daily intake of the TTM was 0.76 g, however ranging from 0.1 to 2.0 g·day−1 as described in previous studies.35, 36 Since most of the medicinal products are consumed by the Tibetans,17, 36 population weights based on the number of the Tibetans and other nationalities in Tibet were used when calculating the PDIs of contaminants in this area. In Tibet, Tibetan nationals accounted for 91% of the population in 2010.37 In order to verify the reliability of the intake estimates, we compared these estimates with the annual production of TTMs. The annual medicine intake was estimated at 0.88 Gg (ranged from 0.12 to 2.3 Gg) in Tibet, while the average annual production was 1.2 Gg from 2005 to 2012, hence the intake and production values are in agreement.

In the majority of cases, people around the globe are exposed to MeHg by consuming fish.11, 38 Therefore, when considering MeHg exposure in the Tibetan population intake of fish was considered along with the TTM intake. Values of THg and MeHg concentrations in muscle tissue of fishes most commonly consumed in Tibet were taken from our previous study.39 Data on fish consumption in Tibet, i.e. 5.8 g·day−1 in 2015, was taken from the yearbook.40 Differently from other regions in China, the staple crops used in Tibet are highland barley and wheat.41, 42 MeHg intake related to consumption of highland barley and wheat were not considered, as there is no evidence of detectable MeHg in these two crops. A previous study showed that Hg concentration in wheat grain was low, because most of the Hg taken up from soils accumulates in the roots.43

2.4. Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling.

The PBPK model was used to quantitatively describe both the uptake and clearance of MeHg in the human body upon ingesting various diets that contained MeHg. The human body was compartmentalized into red blood cells, blood plasma, brain, hair, adipose, gut, intestine, kidney, liver, richly perfused tissue (e.g., myocardium), and slowly perfused tissue (e.g., muscle).44 The structure of the PBPK model of MeHg, including its absorption, degradation, metabolism, and elimination in the human body, has been described in previous studies.44, 45 The toxicokinetic model was coupled with the PBPK, to connect the kinetic behavior of MeHg and IHg, because MeHg can be converted to IHg in human body,44, 45 and to understand the fate of the major fraction of IHg upon its ingestion.46

In the PBPK model, MeHg and THg intake rates (μg·day−1) were calculated based on PDIs and human body weights. Based on previous study, the plasma flow between different tissues and tissue volumes we considered to follow normal distributions, while the partition coefficients between different tissues and blood, and kinetic parameters in human body follow a lognormal distribution.44 All the distributions were considered in the uncertainty analysis based on the Monte Carlo simulation method, following Clewell et al.44 Based on previous publications, the present study assumed 95% as the fraction of MeHg absorbed by the human body.13, 47 Absorption efficiency of IHg from ingested TTMs remains unknown. Previous studies indicated that about 96% of IHg are in the form of cinnabar (α–HgS), and the assimilation efficiency of Hg from cinnabar was lower than 0.2%.18, 20, 48 The bioavailability of Hg2+ to human body from different species (excluding HgS) that are present in TTM is still under question, while the bioavailability of Hg2+ from various food sources to human body is known to range from 0.2% to 94%.49 Based on these values, we set the fraction of IHg assumed to be absorbed by human body in a range of 0 - 4%, and generated by the Monte Carlo simulation in the PBPK model.44 Moreover, we set MeHg and IHg intake from consumed fish as the initial input for the oral dose to quantify the contribution of the TTM. All parameters of the models are included in Table S2, SI.

2.5. Material Flow Analysis.

Material flow analysis was used as an effective tool to provide a system-oriented view of the interlinked processes and fate of contaminants,50, 51 here specifically to understand the fate of TTM Hg in the environment in Tibet and assessing the impact of human physiology in the Hg cycle. Calculation of material flow for either THg or MeHg considered the influences of human physiology, including ingestion of TTM and other dietary intake, and excretion of THg and MeHg from the human body was incorporated with the treatment and transport (i.e., municipal sewage treatment plant and sewage sludge) term with a final step of release into the terrestrial ecosystem and landfill.16 The analysis was established based on the mass balance principle, to ensure that the amount of Hg in the sources was equal to the amount of Hg in the sinks as below:16

ΣiSourcei=Mi+IWi+Ai (2)

where Sourcei is the source of THg (i=1, kg·yr−1) or MeHg (i=2, kg·yr−1) in the environment in Tibet, including municipal sewage discharge (Mi, kg·yr−1), industrial wastewater discharge (IWi, kg·yr−1) and atmospheric deposition (Ai, kg·yr−1). (Mi) is calculated by the mass of THg or MeHg ingested by the Tibetan population (Ii, kg·yr−1), equation (3)) and retention in human body (Hi, kg·yr−1), or estimated from the amount of THg or MeHg in treated municipal sewage discharge (TMi, kg·yr−1), untreated municipal sewage discharge (UMi, kg·yr−1) and retention in the sewage sludge (Si, kg·yr−1) as below:16

Mi=IiHi=TMi+UMi+Si (3)

We calculated the (Ii) based on the equation (4) as below:

Ii=PDIij×bw×P×K (4)

where P is the Tibetan population size and K is the unit conversion factor. In equation (5) shown below, (Sinki) is the fate of THg or MeHg, including inputs to the terrestrial ecosystem (Ti, kg·yr−1), landfill (Li, kg·yr−1) and the human body (Hi, kg·yr−1).

ΣiSinki=Ti+Li+Hi=ΣiSourcei (5)

We regarded the human body as a temporary sink of THg and MeHg with a residence time of one year, as discussed further below. We assumed that sewage sludge was the primary source of THg and MeHg to the landfill in Tibet. More details of the material flow analysis are included in previous studies.16, 52 Amounts of THg and MeHg excreted by human body in Tibet were generated by the PBPK model. According to the yearbook data in 2015, 19% of municipal sewage were received by municipal sewage treatment plants in Tibet.53 Other data that we used in the material flow analysis have been derived from our previous studies.16, 54 These data include concentrations of THg and MeHg in untreated influent and treated effluent sewage output of the municipal sewage treatment plants, amount of THg in sewage sludge deposited in landfills or other terrestrial systems and THg released from industrial wastewater into the terrestrial environment in Tibet.16, 54 In our previous study,16 we have sampled treated and untreated sewage from the largest in Tibet municipal sewage treatment plant in Lhasa, and measured both the THg and MeHg. A value representing the annual deposition of atmospheric THg in Tibet was taken from a previous study.55

2.6. Uncertainty Analysis.

Monte Carlo simulation was applied to analyze the robustness of PBPK of THg and MeHg, and we ran the models 10,000 times following previous studies.54, 56 Median values and 60% confidence intervals (range from 20% to 80%) of the results were calculated to quantify the uncertainties.54, 56

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Toxic Heavy Metal Exposures Induced by Traditional Tibetan Medicine in Tibet.

THg and MeHg concentrations in TTMs are provided in Figure 1. In this study, we have found that the average THg concentration in seven commonly used Tibetan medicinal products was 5,600 ± 3,900 (standard deviation, range: 24 - 12,000, wet weight) μg/g (Figure 1). Most of the THg concentrations of the medicinal products that were measured in the present study were within the range of values that were previously published.17, 18, 21, 22 Tenzin et al. analyzed the THg concentration of five kinds of commonly used TTMs, i.e. Qishiwei Zhenzhu Wan, Ershiwuwei Zhenzhu Wan, Renqing Changjue, Renqing Mangjue, and Zuozhu Daxi. THg concentrations of these medicines ranged from 2,300 to 11,000 μg/g.21, 22 Chen et al. also analyzed the THg concentrations in four Zuozhu Daxi pills and found them ranging from 4,100 to 5,000 μg/g.57 We found that THg levels in the same type of TTM such as Renqing Mangjue and Qishiwei Zhenzhu Wan (P<0.05, Figure 1) produced by different leading manufacturers were significantly different. Although as previously shown, 96% of THg in TTM is present as α–HgS,18, 20, 48 a fraction not likely to be available for absorption by the human body, a large amount of THg would be excreted. The average MeHg concentration in TTM (present study) was 16 ± 12 (range: 0.022 to 37) μg/g, and made up a very small percentage (average: 0.29%; range: 0.086% - 1.1%) of the THg, yet these concentrations were higher than in any other local and commonly consumed food products,11, 13, 14 or in rice from the Hg mining area reputable for the high MeHg concentration (e.g. MeHg = 0.15 μg/g, dry weight).58

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

THg and MeHg concentrations in seven commonly used TTMs. Error bars represent standard deviations of measurement (n = 3).

Other toxic heavy metals were also elevated in TTM (Figure 2). The amount of THg in TTM accounted for 0.56 ± 0.39% of the total TTM mass, followed by Pb (0.27%), Cu (0.13%), Zn (0.11%) and As (0.077%). Like Hg, Pb and As are also considered in the top ten of chemicals of public health concern according to the World Health Organization (WHO, website: www.who.int). Overall, wet weights of TTM are ~1g/pill across the various types (Table S1) and the manufacturer recommended dosage of TTM is ~1 pill·day−1 (Table S1). If a person consumes one pill each day, the PDI values for Pb and As could reach 45 and 13 μg·kg−1·day−1, being 13- and 6.2-fold, above the recommended intake, respectively, based on FAO/WHO.59 It would be of interest that future research focused on chemical forms of these elements, assessing their bioavailability and possible toxicological implications. For example, organic As compounds, which are abundant in seafood, are less harmful to human health in comparison to inorganic As compounds e.g. arsenates found in drinking water in some Asian countries e.g. Bangladesh, Taiwan but also certain regions in the US and possibly elsewhere.60, 61

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Total concentrations of eight selected toxic heavy metals (a) and their percentages of the all measured metals (b) in traditional Tibetan medicines. Error bars in panel “a” represent standard deviations of measurement (n = 3).

In evaluating MeHg concentrations in TTM, the two extraction methods i.e. Method 1 and 2, yielded similar results i.e. 17 ± 12 and 15 ± 11 μg/g, (P>0.05), respectively. Bloom et al. had found Method 2 as most suitable for extracting MeHg from solids because there was no artifactual formation of MeHg.27 Other studies also supported this conclusion.6264 The mechanism leading to the observed MeHg in the TTM is unknown. Abiotic formation of MeHg as a result of the interaction of IHg and organic matter has been previously postulated.65 Most of TTMs are produced by adding various medical herbal and mineral pharmacopeia, and subject to processes which include heating, cooling, washing and mixing.66 Although identification of MeHg origin in TTM is beyond the scope of the present study, we hypothesize that MeHg could be formed during production.

Tibetans regularly consuming TTM are chronically exposed to high THg and MeHg. PDIs for THg and MeHg were 65 and 0.18 μg·kg−1·day−1, accounting for ~100% and 94% of the total intake, respectively. In fact, among all regions considered in the present study (Figure 3), people in Tibet had the highest average PDI of THg. We have found that PDI value for THg in this region was 34-fold higher than in other Hg-contaminated regions such as one rural area of China specializing in Hg mining, Wanshan County. In comparison to Japan, Norway and the U.S., PDI in Tibet was higher by 2×102 – 3×103 times (Figure 3). In contrast to THg, differences in MeHg PDIs between Tibet and other countries were smaller. PDI for MeHg in Tibet was 1.9 times the value for the Hg mining area in rural China, 3.1 times the value for Norway, it was 14 times higher than in the U.S., but the MeHg PDI of Tibet was slightly lower than in Japan, where consumption rate of marine fish is among the highest worldwide (Food and Agricultural Organization, www.fao.org/home/en/). It is therefore evident that among various Asian regions, especially considering China, Tibet is quite unique in terms of THg exposure, with lower differences in exposure to MeHg (Figure 3).13, 14, 6769 It is noteworthy that in China exposure to THg and MeHg is driven by fish consumption,70 while the contribution of fish consumption to the overall Hg exposure is not significant in Tibet (Figure 3). Due to cultural preferences, the fish consumption rate in Tibet is low (5.8 g·day−1).40

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Calculated PDIs of THg and MeHg due to ingesting TTM in Tibet. Error bars represent 95% of confidence intervals due to analytical uncertainty. Data on PDIs in Wanshan Hg mining area in China, Japan, Norway and the U.S. are from previous studies.13, 6769 The black solid line represents the MeHg daily intake of 0.23 μg·kg−1·day−1 recommended by JECFA,59 and the black dotted line is the MeHg daily intake of 0.10 μg·kg−1·day−1 recommended by U.S. EPA.31

This study demonstrates that ingestion of the TTM contributes most of the MeHg exposure in Tibet. Considering a person taking one pill each day (~1 g·day−1), the MeHg PDI could be as high as 0.24 μg·kg−1·day−1, while the U.S. EPA recommended intake of MeHg is equal to or less than 0.1 μg·kg−1·day−1 (Figure 3). Se is a nutrient that could be highly active in counteracting neurological disturbances caused by MeHg toxicity.71, 72 Nevertheless, Se concentrations in TTM products selected in the present study are undetectable. It is therefore possible that toxicity to the human body associated with TTM ingestion might be higher than upon ingestion of equal amount of MeHg in fish.71 While in the past, the high price of TTM prevented regular Tibetans from its use, nowadays, the prices are lower and an increasing number of people can afford it. For example, in 2015, TTM prices ranged from 0.60 to 3.1 $/pill (Table S1). Whether people who regularly consume TTM experience any adverse effects is not clear. One previous study using clinical trials indicated that THg in the TTM products could exert beneficial effects on neurocognition.17 This is contrary to the general perception of the impact of THg on humans and thus the effects of human exposure to IHg and MeHg from TTM require future focus and study to further examine its potential impact.6, 7

3.2. Fate of TTM Hg in the Human Body.

Results of PBPK modeling suggest that upon daily ingestion of TTM, MeHg concentration in blood increases rapidly during the first 202 days of exposure and reaches a steady state of 3.0 μg/L (range: 1.7 - 5.7 μg/L based on the 60% confidence interval – see Materials and Methods; Figure 4). High concentration of IHg in blood occurs instantaneously upon the ingestion of TTM, although a value of 6.0 μg/L (range: 2.8 - 14) is reached after 360 days and continues to increase but very slowly. Blood concentrations of both the MeHg and IHg in people who regularly ingest TTM were determined as higher than for inhabitants of other regions in China, where the exposure sources were associated with consumption of fish and rice. Blood concentrations in people from regions other than Tibet ranged from 0.58 to 1.1 and from 0.60 to 1.9 μg/L, for MeHg and IHg respectively.34, 73, 74

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Responses of blood MeHg and IHg levels to the chronic exposure resulted from the ingestion of TTM. Shaded area represents 60% of confidence intervals generated by the Monte Carlo simulation. The dotted line represents time of equilibrium reached by MeHg in blood.

Uncertainties of blood MeHg and IHg concentrations estimated through PBPK modeling were similar to the PBPK modeling results based on the Monte Carlo analysis in a previous study.44 High uncertainty in the present study could be attributed partly to uncertainties associated with THg and MeHg intake levels used in the model, driven primarily by the analytical uncertainty of the THg and MeHg concentrations between different medicines. Values of some partition coefficients had higher coefficient of variation (i.e. 70%) therefore some critical parameters, e.g. hair / blood and kidney / blood, MeHg partition coefficients, also contributed to the high uncertainty of the model output 44. Despite the uncertainty, the PBPK modeling is able to demonstrate the general trends in MeHg and IHg concentrations in blood during the yearlong exposure associated with daily ingestion of TTM.

Results of modeling the fate of MeHg and IHg in human organs, upon ingesting just one TTM pill showed a rapid increase and a slow (i.e. >60 days) release due to metabolism and excretion (Figure 5). Most MeHg is projected to accumulate in the slowly perfused tissue. Between 47 to 180 days are required for different compartments of human body to return to MeHg levels that existed prior to the ingestion of one TTM pill. Furthermore, kidney appears to be a significant organ in terms of IHg retention (Figure 5 - bottom panel). A previous study indicated that under continuous exposure, the time required to reach equilibrium in kidney IHg concentration was longer in comparison to other tissues/organs such as blood, liver and brain.46 Prolonged lifetime of IHg in the various tissues and organs is of concern due to published evidence of its damage to these and other (e.g. nervous, immune, gastrointestinal systems) organs.75 The result of our model suggests that ~2 years are required for kidney to reach IHg levels that existed pre-ingestion. However, IHg in other compartments declined by 99% in the first three days, yet we have determined that to fully purge the body out of this IHg ~0.8 year is needed and this is largely due to the slow release of IHg from kidneys.46 Hence, we suggest that the impact of Hg from the TTMs should be carefully evaluated to minimize the health risks to the people who regularly ingest these products.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Responses and distributions of MeHg and IHg levels in different compartments of human body induced by the ingestion of one pill (~1 gram) of TTM.

3.3. Influence of TTM on the Hg Budget in the Environment in Tibet.

In 2015, 4,500 kg of THg and 13 kg of MeHg were ingested by Tibetan inhabitants, respectively, primarily with TTM (Figure 6). Given the high amount of THg in TTM products, and its low assimilation by the human body (<4%), which then drive high concentrations in human excretions, it is necessary to understand its fate in the environment in Tibet. The material flow analysis of THg showed that 860 kg of THg excreted by Tibetan inhabitants entered into municipal sewage treatment plants in Tibet in 2015, while 3,600 kg were directly released into the terrestrial environment (Figure 6).16

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Diagram describing the lifecycles of THg and MeHg from the time of ingestion to their release into the terrestrial environment in Tibet. THg and MeHg data representing sources from the municipal sewage, sewage sludge, industrial wastewater as well as from the atmospheric deposition are from previous studies.16, 54, 55

Based on our updated budget calculations, the estimated amount of THg in the municipal sewage treatment plants in Tibet is 34% higher than in our previous estimates, which were based on environmental sample measurements.16 This discrepancy possibly originates from: (1) measurement errors of THg concentrations; (2) modeling errors from the PBPK model; and (3) statistical errors of the yearbook data and possibly for other reasons that we are not aware of. Despite the errors, the comparison of our previous and present studies suggested that the THg content in the influent sewage of municipal sewage treatment plants could be an index of regional population exposure to THg in Tibet, and potentially to other populations in underdeveloped regions.

In the case of MeHg, our current estimate of input into the municipal sewage was 9.3×10−2 kg in 2015, which is 79% lower than what we have determined in our previous study.16 This difference could be due to occurrence of substantial IHg methylation in the sewage during its delivery, or the heterogeneity in the sewage treatment plant releases itself. Hence sampling and analysis of the effluent would reflect the MeHg levels altered by other natural processes, including methylation by members of abundant microflora of the sewage. Combination of our former analyses and current modeling preliminarily suggests that between human excretion and arrival to the municipal sewage treatment plant, MeHg levels could increase by a factor of 5. In addition to household contributions, MeHg in the municipal sewage might also originate from other sources such as industrial wastewater and road runoff,16, 76 although due to low level of industrialization in Tibet these sources are likely of low significance. Further studies are needed to evaluate MeHg sources from the municipal sewage treatment plants.

Our analysis has indicated that THg released from the human body into the terrestrial environment associated with the TTM was a major contributor of THg in Tibet (Figure 6). In total, 3,600 kg of THg was released from human body into the terrestrial environment in Tibet in 2015 and accounted for 45% of the total THg source, while atmospheric deposition and industrial wastewater discharge contributed 54% and < 0.2%, respectively. As the assimilation efficiency of IHg in people is low, most ingested TTM IHg will be excreted and pass through the sewage treatment plants, resulting in the highest per capita THg and MeHg releases from the Tibetan municipal sewage into the natural environment among all regions in China.16

3.4. Implications for Human Health and Environment.

In our present study we have found that Tibetans are chronically exposed to high IHg and elevated MeHg levels through regular ingestion of TTM. The calculated exposure levels upon ingestion of TTM are higher than previously reported for populations from other regions in the world including those that are known to be Hg polluted regions.13, 77 Mercurous chloride (HgCl2), which has a relatively high assimilation ranging between 1 and 38%, was widely used in medical preparations in the past, especially as a laxative but also in infant teething powders.48, 75 Assimilation of Hg from cinnabar is lower (<0.2%) than for HgCl2.48 In consideration of the extremely high IHg concentration in TTM, further research on the chemical form of Hg, as well as its bioavailability and possible human health impacts would be highly desirable. Future research should also evaluate the bioavailability of Hg from TTM in consideration of possible interactions with specific foods e.g. protein rich products.

Although the exposure levels for MeHg were substantially lower than for IHg, they were tens of times higher than from fish.11, 12 Therefore, a small quantity of the daily ingested products believed to be beneficial to human health could serve as a significant source to drive the high PDI of MeHg for the people of Tibet. Since the impacts of high MeHg, IHg and other toxic heavy metals in TTMs are still unclear, and the method used to manufacture these products is confidential, we argue for urgency of future research in this area. Focus on high THg use and effects of IHg and MeHg in the Tibetan medicinal products on human health, as well as the origin of MeHg in the medicine, would be of high societal benefit in Tibet and provide insights to other cultures, which may use similar products.78

As described above, statistics for the consumption of TTM products in Tibet are not available, and the percentage of the Tibetan population not consuming the TTM products in Tibet is not known. Such knowledge gaps likely result in large uncertainties for the population-wide estimates of the exposure level, and for the Hg budget when considering human physiology. Further detailed investigations on the ingestion of TTM products by local populations are needed. Due to the high THg level in the influent of municipal sewage in Tibet, which is a consequence of TTM ingestion, we also suggest that regulatory authorities in China should formulate relevant standards and contaminant-control policies that are mindful of protecting human and environmental health.

Supplementary Material

supplement

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors very much appreciate the four reviewers’ insightful comments and suggestions on the paper. This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571484, 41630748, 41571130010, 41130535, and 41471403). Involvement of Robert P. Mason was supported by the Dartmouth National Institute of Health Superfund Program grant (No. P42 ES007373). The authors would like to thank Tao Liang and Hongzhi Zhang in Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research for their assistance on the heavy metal measurement.

Footnotes

Competing financial interests:

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

Additional information on the TTM (Table S1) and parameters of the PBPK model (Table S2).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Driscoll CT; Mason RP; Chan HM; Jacob DJ; Pirrone N, Mercury as a global pollutant: sources, pathways, and effects. Environ. Sci. Technol 2013, 47, (10), 4967–4983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nriagu JO; Pacyna JM, Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soils by trace metals. Nature 1988, 333, (6169), 134–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kocman D; Wilson SJ; Amos HM; Telmer KH; Steenhuisen F; Sunderland EM; Mason RP; Outridge P; Horvat M, Toward an assessment of the global inventory of present-day mercury releases to freshwater environments. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, (2), 138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Streets DG; Horowitz HM; Jacob DJ; Lu Z; Levin L; Ter Schure AF; Sunderland EM, Total mercury released to the environment by human activities. Environ. Sci. Technol 2017, 51, (11), 5969–5977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pirrone N; Cinnirella S; Feng X; Finkelman RB; Friedli HR; Leaner J; Mason R; Mukherjee AB; Stracher G; Streets DG, Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources. Atmos. Chem. Phys 2010, 10, (13), 5951–5964. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Axelrad DA; Bellinger DC; Ryan LM; Woodruff TJ, Dose–response relationship of prenatal mercury exposure and IQ: an integrative analysis of epidemiologic data. Environ. Health Perspect 2007, 115, (4), 609–615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Choi AL; Weihe P; Budtz-Jørgensen E; Jørgensen PJ; Salonen JT; Tuomainen T-P; Murata K; Nielsen HP; Petersen MS; Askham J, Methylmercury exposure and adverse cardiovascular effects in Faroese whaling men. Environ. Health Perspect 2009, 117, (3), 367–372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lavoie RA; Jardine TD; Chumchal MM; Kidd KA; Campbell LM, Biomagnification of mercury in aquatic food webs: a worldwide meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol 2013, 47, (23), 13385–13394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mason RP; Choi AL; Fitzgerald WF; Hammerschmidt CR; Lamborg CH; Soerensen AL; Sunderland EM, Mercury biogeochemical cycling in the ocean and policy implications. Environ. Res 2012, 119, 101–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sundseth K; Pacyna JM; Pacyna EG; Pirrone N; Thorne RJ, Global sources and pathways of mercury in the context of human health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, (1), 105–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sunderland EM, Mercury exposure from domestic and imported estuarine and marine fish in the US seafood market. Environ. Health Perspect 2007, 115, (2), 235–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Baumann Z; Mason RP; Conover DO; Balcom P; Chen CY; Buckman KL; Fisher NS; Baumann H, Mercury bioaccumulation increases with latitude in a coastal marine fish (Atlantic silverside, Menidia menidia). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci 2016, 74, (7), 1009–1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang H; Feng X; Larssen T; Qiu G; Vogt RD, In inland China, rice, rather than fish, is the major pathway for methylmercury exposure. Environ. Health Perspect 2010, 118, (9), 1183–1188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hong C; Yu X; Liu J; Cheng Y; Rothenberg SE, Low-level methylmercury exposure through rice ingestion in a cohort of pregnant mothers in rural China. Environ. Res 2016, 150, 519–527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jiang J; Lou Z; Ng S; Luobu C; Ji D, The current municipal solid waste management situation in Tibet. Waste Manage 2009, 29, (3), 1186–1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu M; Du P; Yu C; He Y; Zhang H; Sun X; Lin H; Luo Y; Xie H; Guo J; Zhang Q; Chen L; Zhang W; Li X; Wang X, Increases of Total Mercury and Methylmercury Releases from Municipal Sewage into Environment in China and Implications. Environ. Sci. Technol 2017, 52, (1), 124–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sallon S; Dory Y; Barghouthy Y; Tamdin T; Sangmo R; Tashi J; Yangdon S; Yeshi T; Sadutshang T; Rotenberg M, Is mercury in Tibetan Medicine toxic? Clinical, neurocognitive and biochemical results of an initial cross-sectional study. Exp. Biol. Med 2017, 242, (3), 316–332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sallon S; Namdul T; Dolma S; Dorjee P; Dolma D; Sadutshang T; Ever-Hadani P; Bdolah-Abram T; Apter S; Almog S, Mercury in traditional Tibetan medicine-panacea or problem? Hum. Exp. Toxicol 2006, 25, (7), 405–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Martena MJ; Van Der Wielen JC; Rietjens IM; Klerx WN; De Groot HN; Konings EJ, Monitoring of mercury, arsenic, and lead in traditional Asian herbal preparations on the Dutch market and estimation of associated risks. Food Addit. Contam 2010, 27, (2), 190–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wu Q; Li W; Zhou Z; Li Y; Xiong T; Du Y; Wei L; Liu J, The Tibetan medicine Zuotai differs from HgCl2 and MeHg in producing liver injury in mice. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol 2016, 78, 1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tenzin; Sheng D; Baimazhuoka, The analysis and evaluation of the contents of heavy metals of valuable Tibetan Medicines. China Medicine and Pharmacy 2013, (18), 42–44 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tenzin Xu, Hu Y, Pema X, Zhang Y, Pema Q, Nyidron D; Pema D, Analysis on content of heavy metals in Tibetan Medicine Tsodro Daxi and its toxicity evaluation. Journal of Tibet university 2013, 28, (1), 32–36 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.EPA, Method 1631, Revision E: Mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Washington DC, US, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hammerschmidt CR; Fitzgerald WF, Formation of artifact methylmercury during extraction from a sediment reference material. Anal. Chem 2001, 73, (24), 5930–5936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Buck CS; Hammerschmidt CR; Bowman KL; Gill GA; Landing WM, Flux of Total Mercury and Methylmercury to the Northern Gulf of Mexico from US Estuaries. Environ. Sci. Technol 2015, 49, (24), 13992–13999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lambertsson L; Lundberg E; Nilsson M; Frech W, Applications of enriched stable isotope tracers in combination with isotope dilution GC-ICP-MS to study mercury species transformation in sea sediments during in situ ethylation and determination. J. Anal. At. Spectrom 2001, 16, (11), 1296–1301. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bloom NS; Colman JA; Barber L, Artifact formation of methyl mercury during aqueous distillation and alternative techniques for the extraction of methyl mercury from environmental samples. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem 1997, 358, (3), 371–377. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.EPA, Method 1630, Methyl mercury in water by distillation, aqueous ethylation, purge and trap, and CVAFS. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Washington DC, US, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Koshikawa MK; Takamatsu T; Takada J; Zhu M; Xu B; Chen Z; Murakami S; Xu K; Watanabe M, Distributions of dissolved and particulate elements in the Yangtze estuary in 1997–2002: background data before the closure of the Three Gorges Dam. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci 2007, 71, (1-2), 26–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.WHO, Guidance for identifying populations at risk from mercury exposure. World Health Organization (WHO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.EPA Mercury Study Report to Congress: An Assessment of Exposure to Mercury in the United States; US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Washington DC, US, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.WHO, Methylmercury. World Health Organization (WHO): Geneva, Switzerland, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.WHO, Inorganic Mercury. World Health Organization (WHO): Geneva, Switzerland, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Deng C; Xie H; Ye X; Zhang H; Liu M; Tong Y; Ou L; Yuan W; Zhang W; Wang X, Mercury risk assessment combining internal and external exposure methods for a population living near a municipal solid waste incinerator. Environ. Pollut 2016, 219, 1060–1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang X; Zhou L; Yang N, Elemental analysis of heavy metals in Tibetan Medicine 25 Wei Zhen Zhu Wan. Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs 2010, 24, (4), 344–346 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang W; Liu X; Luo G; Liu Y; Yuan L; Xiao R; Zhang Y; Liu H, Comparative study of total and soluble arsenic, mercury in the Tsothel and other precious Tibetan medicines. Chin. J. Pharm. Anal 2016, 36, (4), 721–726 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.NBS, Tabulation on the 2010 Population Census of Tibet Autonomous Region. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS): Beijing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Giang A; Selin NE, Benefits of mercury controls for the United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 2016, 113, (2), 286–291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang Q; Pan K; Kang S; Zhu A; Wang W-X, Mercury in wild fish from high-altitude aquatic ecosystems in the Tibetan Plateau. Environ. Sci. Technol 2014, 48, (9), 5220–5228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.NBS, China Statistical Yearbook. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS): Beijing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Guedes J. A. d. A. Lu H, Hein AM, Schmidt AH, Early evidence for the use of wheat and barley as staple crops on the margins of the Tibetan Plateau. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 2015, 112, (18), 5625–5630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhaofei L; Yao Z; Yu C; Zhong Z, Assessing Crop Water Demand and Deficit for the Growth of Spring Highland Barley in Tibet, China. J. Integr. Agric 2013, 12, (3), 541–551. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang S; Nan Z; Prete D; Ma J; Liao Q; Zhang Q, Accumulation, transfer, and potential sources of mercury in the soil-wheat system under field conditions over the Loess Plateau, northwest China. Sci. Total Environ 2016, 568, 245–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Clewell HJ; Gearhart JM; Gentry PR; Covington TR; VanLandingham CB; Crump KS; Shipp AM, Evaluation of the uncertainty in an oral reference dose for methylmercury due to interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics. Risk Anal 1999, 19, (4), 547–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Brown RP; Delp MD; Lindstedt SL; Rhomberg LR; Beliles RP, Physiological parameter values for physiologically based pharmacokinetic models. Toxicol. Ind. Health 1997, 13, (4), 407–484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Carrier G; Bouchard M; Brunet RC; Caza M, A toxicokinetic model for predicting the tissue distribution and elimination of organic and inorganic mercury following exposure to methyl mercury in animals and humans. II. Application and validation of the model in humans. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol 2001, 171, (1), 50–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Holmes P; James K; Levy L, Is low-level environmental mercury exposure of concern to human health? Sci. Total Environ 2009, 408, (2), 171–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Liu J; Shi J-Z; Yu L-M; Goyer RA; Waalkes MP, Mercury in traditional medicines: is cinnabar toxicologically similar to common mercurials? Exp. Biol. Med 2008, 233, (7), 810–817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bradley MA; Barst BD; Basu N, A review of mercury bioavailability in humans and fish. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, (2), 169–188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lin Y; Wang S; Wu Q; Larssen T, Material flow for the intentional use of mercury in China. Environ. Sci. Technol 2016, 50, (5), 2337–2344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liu M; Zhang Q; Luo Y; Mason RP; Ge S; He Y; Yu C; Sa R; Cao H; Wang X, Impact of Water-induced Soil Erosion on the Terrestrial Transport and Atmospheric Emission of Mercury in China. Environ. Sci. Technol 2018, 52, (12), 6945–6956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Allesch A; Brunner PH, Material flow analysis as a tool to improve waste management systems: the case of Austria. Environ. Sci. Technol 2016, 51, (1), 540–551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.NBS, China Environmental Statistical Yearbook. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS): Beijing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liu M; Zhang W; Wang X; Chen L; Wang H; Luo Y; Zhang H; Shen H; Tong Y; Ou L, Mercury release to aquatic environments from anthropogenic sources in China from 2001 to 2012. Environ. Sci. Technol 2016, 50, (15), 8169–8177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhang Q; Huang J; Wang F; Mark L; Xu J; Armstrong D; Li C; Zhang Y; Kang S, Mercury distribution and deposition in glacier snow over western China. Environ. Sci. Technol 2012, 46, (10), 5404–5413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Liu M; Chen L; Wang X; Zhang W; Tong Y; Ou L; Xie H; Shen H; Ye X; Deng C, Mercury export from mainland China to adjacent seas and its influence on the marine mercury balance. Environ. Sci. Technol 2016, 50, (12), 6224–6232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chen Y; Wang C; Kuang G; Zeng R, Determination and correlation analysis on 26 inorganic elements in Tibetan treasures medicine Zuozhudaxi and major raw mineral material by microwave digestion-ICP-OES. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs 2016, 47, (13), 2346–2352 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Horvat M; Nolde N; Fajon V; Jereb V; Logar M; Lojen S; Jacimovic R; Falnoga I; Liya Q; Faganeli J, Total mercury, methylmercury and selenium in mercury polluted areas in the province Guizhou, China. Sci. Total Environ 2003, 304, (1), 231–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.JECFA Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Thirty-third Meeting. Summary and Conclusions; World Health Organization: Geneva, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Fendorf S; Michael HA; van Geen A, Spatial and temporal variations of groundwater arsenic in South and Southeast Asia. Science 2010, 328, (5982), 1123–1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Taylor V; Goodale B; Raab A; Schwerdtle T; Reimer K; Conklin S; Karagas MR; Francesconi KA, Human exposure to organic arsenic species from seafood. Sci. Total Environ 2017, 580, 266–282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Leermakers M; Nguyen H; Kurunczi S; Vanneste B; Galletti S; Baeyens W, Determination of methylmercury in environmental samples using static headspace gas chromatography and atomic fluorescence detection after aqueous phase ethylation. Anal. Bioanal. Chem 2003, 377, (2), 327–333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Baeyens W; Leermakers M; Molina R; Holsbeek L; Joiris C, Investigation of headspace and solvent extraction methods for the determination of dimethyl-and monomethylmercury in environmental matrices. Chemosphere 1999, 39, (7), 1107–1117. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Leermakers M; Baeyens W; Quevauviller P; Horvat M, Mercury in environmental samples: speciation, artifacts and validation. Trac-Trends Anal. Chem 2005, 24, (5), 383–393. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Weber JH, Review of possible paths for abiotic methylation of mercury (II) in the aquatic environment. Chemosphere 1993, 26, (11), 2063–2077. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Saxer M, Manufacturing Tibetan medicine: the creation of an industry and the moral economy of Tibetanness. Berghahn Books: 2013; Vol. 12. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Iwasaki Y; Sakamoto M; Nakai K; Oka T; Dakeishi M; Iwata T; Satoh H; Murata K, Estimation of daily mercury intake from seafood in Japanese women: Akita cross-sectional study. The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine 2003, 200, (2), 67–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mangerud G, Dietary Mercury Exposure in selected Norwegian Municipalities: The Norwegian Fish and Game Study, part C. In 2005.
  • 69.Mahaffey KR; Clickner RP; Bodurow CC, Blood organic mercury and dietary mercury intake: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 and 2000. Environ. Health Perspect 2004, 112, (5), 562–570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Liu M; Chen L; He Y; Baumann Z; Mason R; Shen H; Yu C; Zhang W; Zhang Q; Wang X, Impacts of farmed fish consumption and food trade on methylmercury exposure in China. Environ. Int 2018, Unpublished results. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ralston NV; Ralston CR; Blackwell JL III; Raymond LJ, Dietary and tissue selenium in relation to methylmercury toxicity. Neurotoxicology 2008, 29, (5), 802–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ganther H; Goudie C; Sunde M; Kopecky M; Wagner P; Oh S-H; Hoekstra W, Selenium: relation to decreased toxicity of methylmercury added to diets containing tuna. Science 1972, 175, (4026), 1122–1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ou L; Chen C; Chen L; Wang H; Yang T; Xie H; Tong Y; Hu D; Zhang W; Wang X, Low-level prenatal mercury exposure in north China: an exploratory study of anthropometric effects. Environ. Sci. Technol 2015, 49, (11), 6899–6908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Rothenberg SE; Yu X; Zhang Y, Prenatal methylmercury exposure through maternal rice ingestion: Insights from a feasibility pilot in Guizhou Province, China. Environ. Pollut 2013, 180, 291–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Clarkson TW; Magos L, The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit. Rev. Toxicol 2006, 36, (8), 609–662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhao H; Li X; Wang X; Tian D, Grain size distribution of road-deposited sediment and its contribution to heavy metal pollution in urban runoff in Beijing, China. J. Hazard. Mater 2010, 183, (1-3), 203–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Harada M, Minamata disease: methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution. Crit. Rev. Toxicol 1995, 25, (1), 1–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Biswas JK; Rai M; Mondal M; Ingle AP, The Flop Side of Using Heavy Metal (oids) s in the Traditional Medicine: Toxic Insults and Injury to Human Health In Biomedical Applications of Metals, Springer: 2018; pp 257–276. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplement

RESOURCES