Skip to main content
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2006 Jan 31;11(1):43–48. doi: 10.3390/11010043

Synthesis of Some New 2-(3-Aryl-1-phenyl-4-pyrazolyl)- benzoxazoles Using Hypervalent Iodine Mediated Oxidative Cyclization of Schiff’s Bases

Om Prakash 1,*, Kamaljeet Pannu 1, Ajay Kumar 1
PMCID: PMC6148480  PMID: 17962744

Abstract

Ten new 2-(3-aryl-1-phenyl-4-pyrazolyl)benzoxazoles have been synthesized by oxidative intramolecular cyclization of the corresponding Schiff’s bases using iodobenzene diacetate in methanol as an oxidant.

Keywords: Hypervalent iodine, Iodobenzene diacetate, Schiff’s base, Oxidation, Benzoxazoles.

Introduction

In connection with our ongoing programme directed towards the use of organoiodine(III) compounds as unique reagents in organic synthesis [1,2], we have recently reported that oxidation of phenolic Schiff’s bases (SBs) with iodobenzene diacetate (IBD) leads to facile intramolecular cyclization, thus providing an efficient synthesis of 2-substituted benzoxazoles (Scheme 1) [3]. This observation, coupled with the fact that benzoxazoles [4] and pyrazoles [5] are often associated with important biological properties, prompted us to extend the scope of this iodine(III) mediated approach to the synthesis of some new 2-(3-aryl-1-phenyl-4-pyrazolyl)benzoxazoles 4aa-4be.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Results and Discussion

First we prepared Schiff’s base 3aa by the condensation of o-aminophenol (1a) with 4-formyl-1,3- diphenylpyrazole (2a). Then, oxidation of 3aa was tried using our previously reported procedure involving 1.1 equivalents of IBD in dichloromethane. The reaction occurred readily, but the yield of the expected product 4aa was not good (only 24%). Interestingly, using methanol as a solvent in this reaction, compound 4aa was obtained in noticeably improved yield (60%). In order to study the scope of this approach, other Schiff’s bases 3aa-3be, available by the condensation of 1a or 1b with different formylpyrazoles 2a-e, were subjected to oxidative cyclization using 1.1 equivalents of IBD in methanol. The reaction, indeed, afforded the desired benzoxazole derivatives 4aa-4be in yields ranging from 55% to 88% (Scheme 2, Table 1).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Table 1.

Physical and 1H-NMR data of 2-(3-aryl-1-phenyl-4-pyrazolyl)benzoxazoles 4aa-4be

Comp.a m.p. (°C) Yieldb (%) 1H-NMR (δ)
4aa 141-142 60 6.84-7.84 (m, 14 H, aromatic protons), 8.65 (s, 1 H, C5-H)
4ab 186-187 81 7.34-8.05 (m, 13 H, aromatic protons), 8.74 (s, 1 H, C5-H)
4ac 166-168 64 3.89 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 7.02-7.99 (m, 13 H, aromatic protons), 8.71 (s, 1 H, C5-H)
4ad 142-145 58 1.5 (s, 3 H, CH3), 7.18-7.94 (m, 13 H, aromatic protons), 8.53 (s, 1 H, C5-H)
4ae 122-124 61 7.19-8.21 (m, 13 H, aromatic protons), 8.65 (s, 1 H, C5-H)
4ba 137-139 73 7.22-7.92 (m, 13 H, aromatic protons), 8.65 (s, 1 H, C5-H)
4bb 160-161 78 7.20-7.93 (m, 12H, aromatic protons), 8.63 (s, 1H, C5-H)
4bc 128-129 72 3.83 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 6.94-7.9 (m, 12 H, aromatic protons) 8.63 (s, 1 H, C5-H)
4bd 148-150 55 1.5 (s, 3 H, CH3), 6.81-7.93 (m, 12 H, aromatic protons), 8.65 (s, 1 H, C5-H)
4be 240-242 76 c

a These are new products and their obtained elemental analyses (C, H, N) were satisfactory.

b Yields of isolated pure product based on the amount of Schiff’s base employed.

c 1H-NMR could not be recorded because of solubility problems.

The formylpyrazoles 2a-e needed in this study were prepared by Vilsmeier-Haack reaction of acetophenone phenylhydrazones (Scheme 3) [6]. The formylpyrazoles 2a and 2e are known compounds [6] and were identified by comparison of their melting points with those reported in the literature. The products 2b-2d are new compounds and were characterized by their spectral data.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

The products 3aa-3be and 4aa-4be are also all new compounds and their structures were established by spectral and elemental analysis data. Schiff’s bases 3aa-3be were characterized by the absence of the 1674 cm−1(C=O stretch) signal and presence of a broad weak signal at 3360 cm−1(O-H stretch) in their IR spectra. A distinctive feature of their 1H-NMR spectra was presence of two singlets between 8.3 δ- 8.8 δ corresponding to the C5-H and CH=N protons (Table 2). The intramolecular cyclization of Schiff’s bases to 2-(3-aryl-1-phenyl-4-pyrazolyl)benzoxazoles 4aa-4be was characterized by the disapperance of the 3360 cm−1 (O-H stretch) signal in the IR spectra, a downfield shift of the C5-H proton as a result of the cyclization and the disappearance of the CH=N proton signal in the corresponding 1H-NMR spectra (Table 2).

Table 2.

Physical and spectral data of Schiff’s bases 3aa-3be

Comp.a m.p.(°C) Yieldb (%) IR (O-H str cm−1) 1H-NMR (δ)
3aa 143-144 76 3351 6.84-7.84 (m, 14 H, aromatic protons), 8.60 (s, 1 H, C5-H), 8.73 (s, 1 H, HC=N)
3ab 142-143 72 3390 6.98-7.84 (m, 13 H, aromatic protons), 8.58 (s, 1 H, C5-H), 8.69 (s, 1 H, HC=N)
3ac 146-147 81 3375 3.89 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 7.02-7.99 (m, 13 H, aromatic protons), 8.58 (s, 1 H, C5-H), 8.71 (s, 1 H, HC=N)
3ad 126-128 58 3348 1.5 (s, 3 H, CH3), 7.18-7.94 (m, 13 H, aromatic protons), 8.42 (s, 1 H, C5-H), 8.65 (s, 1 H, HC=N)
3ae 100-101 61 3345 7.19-8.21 (m, 13 H, aromatic protons), 8.52 (s, 1 H, C5-H), 8.64 (s, 1 H, HC=N)
3ba 182-183 78 3360 6.89-7.77 (m, 13 H, aromatic protons), 8.52 (s, 1 H, C5-H), 8.59 (s, 1 H, HC=N)
3bb 240-242 79 3359 7.20-7.93 (m, 12 H, aromatic protons), 8.54 (s, 1 H, C5-H), 8.66 (s, 1 H, HC=N)
3bc 128-129 72 3372 3.83 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 6.94-7.9 (m, 12 H, aromatic protons), 8.47 (s, 1 H, C5-H), 8.59 (s, 1 H, HC=N)
3bd 160-162 55 3358 1.5 (s, 3 H, CH3), 6.81-7.93 (m, 12 H, aromatic protons), 8.53 (s, 1 H, C5-H), 8.62 (s, 1 H, HC=N)
3be 252-254 86 3414 c

a These are new products and their obtained elemental analyses (C, H, N) were satisfactory.

b Yields of Schiff’s bases based on the amount of formylpyrazole used.

c 1H-NMR could not be recorded due to poor solubility.

Conclusions

In summary, the synthesis of new pyrazolylbenzoxazoles reported in this study provides a novel example of an attractive and effective iodine(III) mediated heterocyclic synthesis. The organoiodine (III) mediated approach described is preferred over the existing methods because of the less toxic nature of these reagents compared to other oxidants previously used in this type of transformation, namely, lead tetraacetate [7], nickel peroxide [8], copper (I) chloride in the presence of dioxygen [9], which are highly toxic.

Experimental

General

All reagents were purchased from commercial sources and were used without further purification. Melting points were taken in open capillaries and are uncorrected. 1H-NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 300 MHz instrument using TMS as an internal standard. IR spectra were recorded on a Buck Scientific IR M-500 spectrophotometer. Yields, physical properties (m.p.) and spectroscopic data of the prepared compounds are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2.

General Method for the Preparation of 3-Aryl-4-formyl-1-phenylpyrazoles 2a-e:

The appropriate acetophenone phenylhydrazone (15 mmol) was added to a cold solution of dimethylformamide (25 mL) and phosphorus oxychloride (5 mL), and the resulting mixture was stirred at 50-60 °C for 5-6 hrs, then cooled to room temperature and poured into ice-cold water. A saturated solution of sodium bicarbonate was added to neutralize the mixture and thus give formylpyrazoles 2a-e, which were isolated by filtration, followed by washing with water. 2a: M.p. 137-138 °C, (Lit. [6] m.p. 140 °C); 2b: M.p. 110-113 °C, 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 6.9- 7.2 (m, 9 H, aromatic protons), 8.5 (s, 1H, C5-H), 9.96 (s, 1H, CHO). IR (νmax, KBr): 1674 cm−1 (C=O); 2c: M.p. 100-102 °C, 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 3.83 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 6.7-7.1 (m, 9 H, aromatic protons), 8.46 (s, 1 H, C5-H), 9.98 (s, 1 H, CHO). IR (νmax, KBr): 1678 cm−1 (C=O); 2d: M.p. 120-122 °C, 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 1.5 (s, 3 H, CH3), 6.8-7.6 (m, 9 H, aromatic protons), 8.57 (s, 1 H, C5-H), 9.87 (s, 1 H, CHO). IR (νmax, KBr): 1680 cm−1 (C=O); 2e: 163-164 °C, (Lit. [6] m.p. 165 °C).

General Method for the Synthesis of Schiff’s bases (SBs) 3aa-3be:

SBs were prepared by refluxing a solution of the appropriate formylpyrazole 2a-e (20 mmol) and o-aminophenol/p-chloro-o-aminophenol (1a-b, 30 mmol) in ethanol (100 mL) for 45-60 minutes. The solid product thus obtained was filtered off and recrystallised from ethanol. The physical and spectral data of the products are listed in Table 2.

General Method for the Synthesis of 2-(3-aryl-1-phenyl-4-pyrazolyl)benzoxazoles 4aa-4be from 3aa- 3be:

To a solution of the appropriate Schiff’s base 3aa-be (10 mmol) in methanol (10 mL) was added IBD (11 mmol) and the mixture was stirred for 45-50 minutes at room temperature. The solid separated was filtered off and washed with methanol. The crude product thus obtained was recrystallized from ethanol. The physical and spectral data of the pure products are listed in Table 1.

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, for the award of a University Research Fellowship to Kamaljeet Pannu and to DRDO (ERIP/ER/0103294/M/01), New Delhi, for the award of a Senior Research Fellowship to Ajay Kumar to carry out this work.

Footnotes

Sample Availability: Samples available from the authors.

References:

  • 1.(a) Prakash O., Singh S. P. Aldrichim. Acta. 1994;27:15 [Google Scholar]; (b) Prakash O., Kaur H., Batra H., Rani N., Singh S. P. J. Org. Chem. 2001;66:2019. doi: 10.1021/jo001504i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Prakash O. Aldrichim. Acta. 1995;28:63 [Google Scholar]; (d) Prakash O., Pundeer R., Kaur H. Synthesis. 2003:2768 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Moriarity R. M., Vaid R. K., Koser G. F. Synlett. 1990:365 [Google Scholar]; (b) Varvoglis A. Hypervalent Iodine in Organic Synthesis. Academic Press; New York: 1997. [Google Scholar]; (c) Varma R. S., Dahiya R., Saini R. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:7029 [Google Scholar]; (d) Xia M., Chen Z.-C. Synthetic Commun. 1997;27:1301 [Google Scholar]; (e) Ochiai M. In: Chemistry of Hypervalent Compounds. Akiba K., editor. VCH Publishers; Weinheim: 1999. pp. 359–387. Chap. 13. [Google Scholar]; (f) Koser G. F. Aldrichim. Acta. 2002;34:89 [Google Scholar]; (g) Zhdankin V. V., Stang P. J. Chem. Rev. 2002;102:2523. doi: 10.1021/cr010003+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Verma R. S., Saini R. K., Prakash O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:2621 [Google Scholar]; (b) Prakash O., Batra A., Sharma V., Saini R. K., Verma R. S. J. Ind. Chem. Soc. 2003;80:1031 [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Grimmet M. R. In: Comprehensive Organic Chemistry. Sammes P. G., editor. Vol. 4. Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1979. 357 [Google Scholar]; (b) Deluca M. R., Kerwin S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:199 [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Goodman L. S., Gillman A. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. MacMillan; New York: 1980. [Google Scholar]; (b) Watcher M., Ferro M. 4826868. U.S. Patent. 1989 [Chem. Abstr. 1988, 108, 186735w]
  • 6.Kira M. A., Abdel-Rahman M. O., Gadalla K. Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1969:109 [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stephens F. F., Brower J. D. J. Chem. Soc. 1949:2971 [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nagakawa K., Onoue H., Sugita J. J. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1964;12:1135. doi: 10.1248/cpb.12.1135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Speier G. J. Mol. Catal. 1987;41:253 [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecules : A Journal of Synthetic Chemistry and Natural Product Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES