Skip to main content
Topics in Antiviral Medicine logoLink to Topics in Antiviral Medicine
. 2016 Nov 28;21(1):6–7.

Update of the Drug Resistance Mutations in HIV-1: March 2013

Victoria A Johnson MD 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Vincent Calvez MD, PhD 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Huldrych F Günthard MD 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Roger Paredes MD, PhD 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Deenan Pillay MD, PhD 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Robert W Shafer MD 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Annemarie M Wensing MD, PhD 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Douglas D Richman MD 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
PMCID: PMC6148891  PMID: 23596273

This March 2013 edition of the IAS–USA drug resistance mutations list updates the figures last published in November 2011.1

In this update, 2 integrase strand transfer inhibitors (InSTIs), elvitegravir and dolutegravir, have become available and were added to the figure. Elvitegravir was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in August 2012 for HIV-1 treatment-naive patients as part of a fixed-dose combination of elvitegravir/cobicistat/tenofovir/emtricitabine.2,3 Dolutegravir is being evaluated in clinical trials for both initial HIV therapy and for use by treatment-experienced patients. It is available in an expanded access program and has been designated for priority review by the US FDA for treatment-experienced patients with detectable viral load who have documented HIV-1 resistance to raltegravir or elvitegravir. Relevant elvitegravir and dolutegravir mutations that have been identified to date are listed on the figure.

The following mutations have been added to existing classes or drugs: M230L has been added to the bars for the non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) efavirenz and nevirapine;4,5 Y188L has been added to the NNRTI rilpivirine bar; the asterisk was removed from E138K (see revised user note).6,7 L74M, T97A, E138A/K, and G140A/S have been added to the InSTI raltegravir bar; E92Q was unbolded.

Methods

The IAS–USA Drug Resistance Mutations Group is an independent, volunteer panel of experts charged with delivering accurate, unbiased, and evidence-based information on these mutations to HIV clinical practitioners. As with all IAS–USA volunteer panels, members are rotated on a structured, planned basis. The group reviews new data on HIV drug resistance to maintain a current list of mutations associated with clinical resistance to HIV. This list includes mutations that may contribute to a reduced virologic response to a drug.

In addition, the group considers only data that have been published or have been presented at a scientific conference. Drugs that have been approved by the US FDA as well as any drugs available in expanded access programs are included (listed in alphabetical order by drug class). User notes provide additional information as necessary. Although the Drug Resistance Mutations Group works to maintain a complete and current list of these mutations, it cannot be assumed that the list presented here is exhaustive.

Identification of Mutations

The mutations listed are those that have been identified by 1 or more of the following criteria: (1) in vitro passage experiments or validation of contribution to resistance by using site-directed mutagenesis; (2) susceptibility testing of laboratory or clinical isolates; (3) nucleotide sequencing of viruses from patients in whom the drug is failing; (4) association studies between genotype at baseline and virologic response in patients exposed to the drug.

The development of more recently approved drugs that cannot be tested as monotherapy precludes assessment of the impact of resistance on antiretroviral activity that is not seriously confounded by activity of other drug components in the background regimen. Readers are encouraged to consult the literature and experts in the field for clarification or more information about specific mutations and their clinical impact. Polymorphisms associated with impaired treatment responses that occur in otherwise wild-type viruses should not be used in epidemiologic analyses to identify transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance.

Clinical Context

The figures are designed for practitioners to use in identifying key mutations associated with antiretroviral drug resistance and in making therapeutic decisions. In the context of making clinical decisions regarding antiretroviral therapy, evaluating the results of HIV-1 genotypic testing includes: (1) assessing whether the pattern or absence of a pattern in the mutations is consistent with the patient’s antiretroviral therapy history; (2) recognizing that in the absence of drug (selection pressure), resistant strains may be present at levels below the limit of detection of the test (analyzing stored samples, collected under selection pressure, could be useful in this setting); and (3) recognizing that virologic failure of the first regimen typically involves HIV-1 isolates with resistance to only 1 or 2 of the drugs in the regimen (in this setting, resistance develops most commonly to lamivudine or emtricitabine or the nonnucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NNRTIs]).

The absence of detectable viral resistance after treatment failure may result from any combination of the following factors: the presence of drug-resistant minority viral populations, a prolonged interval between the time of antiretroviral drug discontinuation and genotypic testing, non-adherence to medications, laboratory error, lack of current knowledge of the association of certain mutations with drug resistance, the occurrence of relevant mutations outside the regions targeted by routine resistance assays, drug-drug interactions leading to subtherapeutic drug levels, and possibly compartmental issues, indicating that drugs may not reach optimal levels in specific cellular or tissue reservoirs.

For more in-depth reading and an extensive reference list, see the 2008 IAS–USA panel recommendations for resistance testing8 and 2012 IAS–USA panel recommendations for antiretroviral therapy.9 Updates are posted periodically at www.iasusa.org.

Comments

Please send your evidence-based comments, including relevant reference citations, to the journal“at”iasusa.org or by fax at 415-544-9401.

Reprint Requests

The Drug Resistance Mutations Group welcomes interest in the mutations figures as an educational resource for practitioners and encourages dissemination of the material to as broad an audience as possible. However, permission is required to reprint the figures and no alterations in format or the content can be made.

Requests to reprint the material should include the name of the publisher or sponsor, the name or a description of the publication in which you wish to reprint the material, the funding organization(s), if applicable, and the intended audience. Requests to make any minimal adaptations of the material should include the former, plus a detailed explanation of the adaptation(s) and, if possible, a copy of the proposed adaptation. To ensure the integrity of the mutations figures, IAS–USA policy is to grant permission for only minor, preapproved adaptations of the figures (eg, an adjustment in size). Minimal adaptations only will be considered; no alterations of the content of the figures or user notes will be permitted.

Permission will be granted only for requests to reprint or adapt the most current version of the mutations figures as they are posted on www.iasusa.org. Because scientific understanding of HIV drug resistance evolves rapidly and the goal of the Drug Resistance Mutations Group is to maintain the most up-to-date compilation of mutations for HIV clinicians and researchers, publication of out-of-date figures is counterproductive. If you have any questions about reprints or adaptations, please contact the IAS–USA.

References

  • 1.Johnson VA, Calvez V, Günthard HF, et al. 2011 Update of the drug resistance mutations in HIV-1. Top Antivir Med. 2011;19(4)156-164. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sax PE, DeJesus E, Mills A, et al. Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir versus co-formulated efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial, analysis of results after 48 weeks. Lancet. 2012;379(9835):2439-2448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.DeJesus E, Rockstroh J, Henry K, et al. Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus co-formulated emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9835):2429-2438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Azijn H, Tirry I, Vingerhoets J, et al. TMC278, a next-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), active against wild-type and NNRTI-resis-tant HIV-1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(2):718-727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Balamane M, Varghese V, Melikian GL, Fessel WJ, Katzenstein DA, Shafer RW. Panel of prototypical recombinant infectious molecular clones resistant to nevirapine, efavirenz, etravirine, and rilpivirine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(8):4522-4524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Haddad M, Napolitano L, Paquet A, et al. Mutation Y188L of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase is strongly associated with reduced susceptibility to rilpivirine. [Abstract 695.] 19th CROI March 5-8, 2012, Seattle, Washington. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Haddad M, Napolitano L, Paquet A, et al. Impact of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase E138 mutations on rilpivirine drug susceptibility. [Abstract 10.] Antivir Ther. 2011;16[Suppl1] A18. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hirsch MS, Günthard HF, Shapiro JM, et al. Antiretroviral drug resistance testing in adult HIV-1 infection: 2008 recommendations of an International AIDS Society–USA panel. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(2):266-285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thompson MA, Aberg JA, Hoy JA, et al. Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV infection: 2012 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society–USA. JAMA 2012;308[4]:387-402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Topics in Antiviral Medicine are provided here courtesy of International Antiviral Society--USA

RESOURCES