Abstract
The biological and medical importance of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) has been recognized for decades. The aim of this bibliometric study is to analyze the quantity and quality of publications in H2S biology and medicine (H2SBM) based on the databases of Web of Science and Google Scholar. A total of 5881 publications published between 1990 and 2016 were analyzed. The number of H2SBM papers published before 2004 was below 100 annually, but thereafter this number rapidly increased and peaked in 2015 with more than 7-fold increase. All publications related to H2SBM research achieved a total h-index of 136 and were cited 123,074 times. The most published disciplines in H2S biomedicine research were the cardiovascular system (8.5%), neuroscience (6.5%), and gastroenterology hepatology (4.7%). The country with the greatest number of publications in the H2SBM research field was the USA with 1765 (30.0%) publications, followed by China with 995 (16.9%) publications and Japan with 555 (9.4%) publications. The top 3 most published institutes were National University of Singapore, Peking University in China, and University of Groningen in Netherlands. Nitric Oxide Biology and Chemistry was the most exploited journal for H2SBM publications with 461 articles, followed by FASEB Journal with 200 publications and Antioxidants Redox Signaling with 116 publications. The most highly cited publications and researchers in H2SBM research were also unmasked from this bibliometric analysis. Collectively, H2SBM publications exhibit a continuous trend of increase, reflecting the increased H2SBM research intensity and diversity globally.
Keywords: H2S, biology and medicine, bibliometric, web of science, h-index
1. Introduction
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) was historically considered to be highly toxic and hazardous to the environment. However, in recent decades, H2S has been recognized as a novel gasotransmitter, similar to nitric oxide and carbon monoxide [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The concept of gasotransmitter and the classifying criteria were first framed in 2002, and since then, we have witnessed the rapid growth of the research field in H2S biology and medicine (H2SBM) [2,11]. A large amount of work has been conducted globally leading to many breakthrough discoveries on the paramount roles of H2S in biology and medicine. H2S acts as a universal molecule in different species, including human, mouse, rat, plant, bacteria, virus, and many others [8]. Four international conferences on the Biology and Medicine of H2S have been held in Shanghai (China, 2009), Atlanta, GA (USA, 2012), Kyoto (Japan, 2014), and Naples (Italy, 2016) [12,13,14], and the 5th international conference will be held in Toronto, ON (Canada) in 2018. In addition, specific H2S-related topics or sections have been featured in numerous symposia such as European Conference on the Biology of Hydrogen Sulfide, and Experimental Biology Meeting. A unique organization, the European Network on Gasotransmitters, was formed in 2011. We are experiencing one of the most expanding research evolutions in the recent history of biomedical sciences.
Despite the large amount of H2SBM-related literature that has been published, a systematic analysis of the scientific literature in H2SBM research has not been conducted to date. Given the enormous number of publications, a bibliometric analysis that identifies comprehensively the major research topics and outcomes in H2SBM will provide insight and guidance for scientists and all relevant stakeholders of academia, industry, and health management. Bibliometrics is often used to measure and compare the publications within a given topic, field, journal, institute, funding agency or country, which would enable the comprehensive recognition of the most important and relevant scientific values and impact [15,16]. To this end, we undertook the present bibliometric study to explore the characteristics of global research publication output from H2SBM research by using publicly available databases including Web of Science and Google Scholar.
2. Methods
2.1. Search Tools
The H2SBM data published between 1990 and 2016 were collected from the Thomson Scientific Web of Science core collection (http://www.webofknowledge.com/WOS), a multidisciplinary index to the journal literature of science and technology [17]. To gather the citation data for H2SBM papers, both Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were used up to 15 October 2017. Web of Science produces interdisciplinary literature databases, including the creditable journals of numerous research disciplines. It should be noted that Web of Science only represents about 15% of the total number of English language journals currently published worldwide [17]. In contrast, Google Scholar includes a wider variety of publications more than Web of Science does [18]. Although both Web of Science and Google Scholar have the powerful feature of tracking citing items, the times cited differ greatly between Web of Science and Google Scholar based on different searching algorithm.
2.2. Search Strategies
“H2S” or “hydrogen sulfide” or “hydrogen sulphide” was used as phrase to search topics with the mode of “basic search” of the Core collection of Web of Science from 1990 to 2016. This first search produced 37,921 articles, which include all the publications in H2S-related research disciplines. The Web of Science subject categories were further selected to search H2SBM articles, including physiology, biology, agricultural multidisciplinary, neuroscience, dentistry oral surgery medicine, immunology, respiratory system, critical care medicine, biochemistry, molecular biology, urology nephrology, hematology, zoology, clinical neurology, endocrinology metabolism, peripheral vascular disease, genetics heredity, plant science, oncology, medicine general internal, medicine research experimental, cell biology, gastroenterology hepatology, horticulture, cardiac cardiovascular systems, pharmacology pharmacy, surgery, and pathology. Meanwhile, the following subject categories were excluded: chemistry physical, engineering chemical, materials science multidisciplinary, chemistry multidisciplinary, environmental science, energy fuels, engineering environmental, electrochemistry, physical applied, geochemistry geophysics, metallurgy metallurgical engineering, physical atomic molecular chemical, biotechnology applied microbiology, chemistry organic, chemistry inorganic nuclear, microbiology, nanoscience nanotechnology, chemistry applied, physical condensed matter, geosciences multidisciplinary, water recourses, instrument instrumentation, multidisciplinary science, food science technology, engineering petroleum, thermodynamics, marine freshwater biology, oceanography, engineering electronic, mineralogy, geology, spectroscopy, toxicology, engineering mechanical, meteorology atmospheric science, ecology, optics, engineering civil, crystallography, mining mineral processing, green sustainable science technology, biophysical, public environmental occupational health, limnology, agricultural dairy animal science, material science ceramics, mechanics, material science paper wood, nuclear science technology, soil science, fisheries, engineering manufacturing, agronomy, computer science interdisciplinary applications, material science textiles, paleontology, construction building technology, remote sensing, engineering industrial, materials science biomaterials, and engineering biomedical. The inclusion and exclusion categories used in our study are intended to relatively focus on the publication directly related to H2SBM, not those with the focus on environment production of H2S, H2S-induced pollution, or H2S toxicology. In this study, two indicators for citation impacts are used, including the impact factor (IF) of journals in 2016 and the h-index. IF is a useful indicator to assess the citation quantity of journals [19]; and the h-index is used to measure the productivity and impact of published works from different researchers, research field, countries, institutes, or journals [20]. SSPS software 16.0 (Armonk, NY, USA) was used to analyze the groups’ correlation coefficient.
3. Results
3.1. Evolution of H2SBM Research
After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria to the publication databases, 5881 publications in H2SBM research were registered from Web of Science core collection database. In recent decades, the literature on H2SBM has an overall increasing trend in the total number of scientific publications from 1990 to 2016 (Figure 1). The global evolution of H2SBM literature can be split into 2 phases. From 1990 to 2003, the H2SBM scientific literature was in a steady-state growth (from 13 publications in 1990 to 77 in 2003). Statistical analysis revealed a low positive significant correlation between the years during 1990 to 2003 and number of scientific publications (r = 0.74). The second phase was between 2004 and 2016, in which the quantity of publications was rapidly increased with the peak reached 760 publications in 2015. Among the 5881 publications, most (5060; 86.0%) were published after 2003 with an annual median growth rate of 56.9 articles per year. The publication number in 2016 was 13.0% less in comparison with that in 2015, the first year in which H2SBM publications were decreased. A positive significant correlation was found between the years (2004–2016) and number of scientific publications (r = 0.91).
3.2. The Top 10 Mostly Cited Publications in H2SBM Research
For all publications related to H2SBM research, an h-index of 136 and total citation of 123,074 times were generated (Web of Science core collection). The median number of citations per article is 20.9. The numbers of citations for the top 10 mostly cited articles ranged from 1073 to 456 by Web of Science or 1754 to 697 by Google Scholar (Table 1) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The median number of citations for these top 10 mostly cited publications was 782 from Web of Science and 1168 from Google Scholar. The rank of the top 10 mostly cited publications listed in Table 1 was based on the average of the numbers of citations quoted from Web of Science and Google Scholar. The top 10 mostly cited articles were published between 1996 and 2012 in 9 different high-quality journals, including EMBO Journal, Science, FASEB Journal, Journal of Neuroscience, Nature Review Drug Discovery, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communication, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, and Physiological Reviews. FASEB Journal published 2 top-cited articles (2nd and 10th). The impact factors for journals that published these top 10 mostly cited articles ranged from 57.0 (Nature Review Drug Discovery) to 2.47 (Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communication) in 2016.
Table 1.
Rank | Title | Author (First and/or Last Author) | Journal | Journal Impact Factor (2016) | Publishing Information | Citation (A) | Citation (B) | Citation (C) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | The vasorelaxant effect of H2S as a novel endogenous gaseous KATP channel opener | Zhao W., Zhang J., Lu Y., Wang R. * | EMBO JOURNAL | 9.792 | 1 November 2001;20(21):6008–6016. | 1414 | 1073 | 1754 |
2 | Two’s company, three’s a crowd: can H2S be the third endogenous gaseous transmitter? | Wang R. * | FASEB JOURNAL | 5.498 | November 2002;16(13):1792–1798. | 1348 | 1025 | 1671 |
3 | The possible role of hydrogen sulfide as an endogenous neuromodulator | Abe K., Kimura H. * | JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE | 5.988 | 1 February 1996;16(3):1066–1071. | 1276 | 1016 | 1536 |
4 | H2S as a physiologic vasorelaxant: hypertension in mice with deletion of cystathionine γ-lyase | Yang G., Wu L. *, Jiang B., Yang W., Qi J., Cao K., Meng Q., Mustafa A.K., Mu W., Zhang S., Snyder S.H. *, Wang R. * | SCIENCE | 37.205 | 24 October 2008;322(5901):587–590. | 1254 | 1061 | 1447 |
5 | Hydrogen sulphide and its therapeutic potential | Szabó C. * | NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY | 57.0 | November 2007;6(11):917–935. | 1038 | 866 | 1210 |
6 | The possible role of hydrogen sulfide as an endogenous smooth muscle relaxant in synergy with nitric oxide | Hosoki R., Matsuki N., Kimura H. * | BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS | 2.466 | 28 August 1997;237(3):527–531. | 901 | 693 | 1109 |
7 | Hydrogen sulfide attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by preservation of mitochondrial function | Elrod J.W., Calvert J.W., Morrison J., Doeller J.E., Kraus D.W., Tao L., Jiao X., Scalia R., Kiss L., Szabo C., Kimura H., Chow C.W., Lefer D.J. * | PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | 9.661 | 25 September 2007;104(39):15560–15565. | 675 | 559 | 791 |
8 | Physiological implications of hydrogen sulfide: a whiff exploration that blossomed | Wang R. * | PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS | 27.312 | April 2012;92(2):791–896. | 634 | 537 | 731 |
9 | Hydrogen sulfide and cell signaling | Li L., Rose P., Moore P.K. * | ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY | 12.877 | 2011;51:169–187. | 616 | 535 | 697 |
10 | Hydrogen sulfide protects neurons from oxidative stress | Kimura Y., Kimura H. * | FASEB JOURNAL | 5.498 | July 2004;18(10):1165–1167. | 597 | 456 | 738 |
Note 1: The rank of this table was based on Citation A, which is the average of Citation B and Citation C. Citation B was based on Web of Science Core Collection. Citation C was based on Google Scholar. * Corresponding author. Note 2: The data summarized in this table were collected on 15 October 2017.
There were 4 different countries of origin for the top 10 mostly cited articles. Canada had the largest number of articles, with 4 from the same group led by R Wang (1st, 2nd, 4th, and 8th). Japan produced 3 articles all with H Kimura as corresponding author (3rd, 6th, and 10th). USA contributed 2 articles, one being from C Szabo group (5th) and another from DJ Lefer group (7th). The 9th one was from PK Moore group in England. In these top 10 mostly cited articles, 6 articles (1st, 3rd, 4th, 6th, 7th, and 10th) were original research articles with 810 mean citation each (Web of science), and the other 4 were review or opinion articles with 741 mean citation each (Web of science). For those 6 research articles, 4 (1st, 4th, 6th, and 7th) were from cardiovascular research and 2 (3rd and 10th) were in neuroscience field.
3.3. The Most Receptive H2SBM Research Publication Avenues
In total, 5881 H2SBM articles were published in a range of more than 100 different journals, and about 23.4% of the H2SBM related publications were published in the top 10 journals as listed in Figure 2. It is not surprised that Nitic Oxide Biology and Chemistry is the most receptive journal for H2SBM research with 461 publications, because this journal encourages the submission of original research, methodology papers and reviews relating to nitric oxide and other gasotransmitters such as H2S and carbon monoxide. The second mostly receptive journal in H2SBM research was FASEB Journal with 200 publications, followed by Antioxidants Redox Signaling with 116 publications and Free Radical Biology and Medicine with 115. The coverage of the last 2 journals clearly includes all gasotransmitters and relevant antioxidant signaling molecules. The 5th to 10th most prolific journals in publishing H2SBM research was Journal of Pharmacological Sciences (92), British Journal of Pharmacology (81), Journal of Biological Chemistry (70), Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (69), Gastroenterology (59), and Biochemistry (59).
3.4. The Most Prolific Countries with H2SBM Research Publications
The publication indicators for the top 10 most prolific countries regarding H2SBM research were presented in Figure 3. The country with the greatest number of scientific publications in H2SBM research field was the USA with 1765 (30.0%) publications, followed by China with 995 (16.9%) publications, Japan with 555 publications (9.4%), England with 449 (7.6%) publications, and Germany with 444 (7.5%) publications. The 6th to 10th productive countries were Canada (413, 7.0%), Italy (314, 5.3%), Singapore (237, 4.0%), Netherlands (191, 3.2%), and France (178, 3.0%). The top 10 prolific countries account for 94.2% of the total number of scientific publications.
3.5. The Most Prolific Institutions with H2SBM Research Publications
Table 2 showed the top 10 productive institutes ranked by the numbers of publications. National University of Singapore was ranked the first in terms of publication output with 235 publications, followed by Peking University in China with 132 publications, University of Groningen in Netherlands with 114 publications, Fudan University in China with 113 publications, University of Exeter in England with 109 publications, and both Lakehead University (Canada) and University of Californian System (USA) with 104 publications. Among the top 10 institutions, 2 each were from China, England, and USA, one each in Canada, Japan, Netherlands, and Singapore. Based on the number of average citations per paper, National Center for Neurology Psychiatry (48.2), University of London (46.2), and Lakehead University (46.1) took the top 3 positions. National University of Singapore (55), Lakehead University (36), Peking University (33) and University of London (33) had the highest h-index.
Table 2.
Rank | Institute | Total Publication | Total Citations | Average Citations per Item | h-Index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | National University of Singapore | 235 | 9424 | 40.1 | 55 |
2 | Peking University, China | 132 | 3564 | 27.0 | 33 |
3 | University of Groningen, Netherlands | 114 | 1889 | 16.6 | 26 |
4 | Fudan University, China | 113 | 2633 | 23.3 | 28 |
5 | University of Exeter, England | 109 | 1793 | 16.5 | 21 |
6 | Lakehead University, Canada | 104 | 4791 | 46.1 | 36 |
7 | University of California System, USA | 104 | 2660 | 25.6 | 28 |
8 | University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston, USA | 103 | 1654 | 25.0 | 25 |
9 | National Center for Neurology Psychiatry, Japan | 102 | 4911 | 48.2 | 31 |
10 | University of London, England | 96 | 4432 | 46.2 | 33 |
Note: The rank of this table was based on the number of total publications.
3.6. The Support of H2SBM Research by Different Funding Agencies
Funding acknowledgements from publications showed that National Natural Science Foundation of China supported the most H2SBM research with 437 (7.4%) publications, followed by the National Institute of Health of USA with 253 (4.3%) and National Heart Lung and Blood Institute of USA (76, 1.3%) (Figure 4). The fourth to tenth funding agencies in supporting H2SBM research were National Science Foundation of USA (71, 1.2%), Canadian Institute of Health Research (62, 1.1%), American Heart Association (51, 0.9%), National Institute of General Medical Sciences of USA (46, 0.8%), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (44, 0.7%), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of USA (33, 0.6%), and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (28, 0.5%).
3.7. Researcher Citation Impact
The top 10 most prolific researchers in H2SBM publications are listed in Table 3. Among these 10 researchers, R. Wang from Canada had the highest citation being 8545 from 130 publications. The 2nd and 3rd most cited authors were PK Moore (7765) and H Kimura (6873) both with 115 publications. M Whiteman from England was the most prolific scientist with 136 publication cited by 3554 times. For these top 10 most productive scientists, PK Moore had the highest h-index of 47 and R Wang was the second with an h-index of 45, separating from the others with a gap. These eminent researchers were definitely considered to be the forerunners in H2SBM research.
Table 3.
Rank | Researcher | Total Citations | Total Publication | Average Citations per Item | h-Index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Wang R. | 8545 | 130 | 65.73 | 45 |
2 | Moore P.K. | 7765 | 115 | 67.52 | 47 |
3 | Kimura H. | 6873 | 115 | 59.77 | 35 |
4 | Whiteman W. | 3554 | 136 | 26.13 | 28 |
5 | Wallace J.L. | 3163 | 69 | 45.84 | 26 |
6 | Tang C.S. | 2936 | 89 | 32.99 | 30 |
7 | Bian J.S. | 2833 | 75 | 37.77 | 30 |
8 | Szabo C. | 2794 | 120 | 23.28 | 28 |
9 | Du J.B. | 2602 | 81 | 32.12 | 29 |
10 | Kawabata A. | 1058 | 78 | 13.56 | 17 |
Note: The rank of this table was based on the number of total citations. Based on the Web of Science data of the top 10 most prolific scientists in H2SBM research for the period of 1990–2017 (dated on 15 October 2017), the total citations for each researcher was collected and ranked.
3.8. Other Publication Performance Indicators
In general, the top 3 most extensively studied disciplines in H2SBM research were biochemistry molecular biology (34.3%), cell biology (17.7%), and pharmacology pharmacy (12.7%) (Figure 5A). Especially for H2S-related medicine research, cardiovascular system (8.5%), neuroscience (6.5%), and gastroenterology hepatology (4.7%) took the top 3 positions (Figure 5B). Furthermore, it was shown that 10.0% of the publications are review paper, while research articles contribute to 62.7% of the total publications (Table 4). The rest types of H2SBM publication were meeting abstract (23.0%), proceeding paper (3.0%), and others (1.1%). The average citations (42.5) for review papers were 64.1% more than that of research papers (25.9). In contrast, the h-index for research papers (120) was about 44.6% more than that of review papers (83). In these 5881 publications, only 6.2% of them were published in open-access journals (Table 5). The average citations per item (21.7) and h-index (136) in no open-access journals were much higher than those in open-access journals (9.4 per item and h-index of 27).
Table 4.
Type | Total Publication | Total Citations | Average Citations per Item | h-Index |
---|---|---|---|---|
Research | 3690 | 95,542 | 25.9 | 120 |
Abstract | 1355 | 190 | 0.1 | 4 |
Review | 591 | 25,085 | 42.5 | 83 |
Table 5.
Open Access | Number of Published Papers | Total Citation | Average Citation per Item | h-Index |
---|---|---|---|---|
NO | 5519 | 119,657 | 21.7 | 136 |
YES | 362 | 3417 | 9.4 | 27 |
4. Discussion
Using bibliometrics to analyze H2SBM literatures allows us to uncover trends in the historical development and help us develop an understanding of the prevalent areas of interest in this field. To the best of knowledge, this study is the first of its kind to assess the productivity in the field of H2SBM during the period between 1990 and 2016 at global level.
Analysis of major research focuses indicated that cardiovascular function is the most common topic in H2S medicine research. Four of the top 10 mostly cited H2SBM papers explored the regulatory roles of H2S in vascular system. For example, some of these studies established the role of H2S as an endogenous KATP channel opener in vascular cells and the cardio-protective effects of H2S under both health and disease conditions [1,2,4,8]. Other hot topics included neuroscience and gastroenterology hepatology, etc. The research area of S-sulfhydration modification of protein and its impact on cellular functions is growing at the fastest pace (138 papers) since the first research paper on S-sulfhydration was published in 2009 [20], which provides the clue for the molecule-to-molecule interaction mechanism for the cellular functions of H2S. It should be noted that H2SBM research is also facing challenges in selective areas. Clinical trials comprised less than 3% of all publications, and phase I–III clinical trials were relatively scarce. The unstable chemical features and tissue-specific effects of H2S lead to the difficulty of developing druggable H2S-releasing compounds. There are strong demands for future application of H2S-based therapy.
In term of the number of published papers in H2SBM research, USA took the first place. The increasingly leading position of USA was also supported by the fact that two of the ten most productive institutions in H2SBM research were located in USA, including University of California System and University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston. China’s total expenditure on Research and Development has been significantly increased over the last 10 years, and National Natural Science Foundation of China was the most acknowledged funding agency in H2SBM publications. As a consequence, the total number of H2SBM papers from China was the second most among all countries, and two universities from China (Peking University and Fudan University) took the second and fourth position in the top 10 most prolific institutes. Singapore is the eighth most productive country in H2SBM research, while National University of Singapore is the number 1 most prolific institute in H2SBM research, attributable to the institution’s effort to assemble a H2S-focused pharmacology research unit and hiring a great number of H2SBM researchers in this university more than a decade ago. The ranks for the most prolific institutes or countries did not consider the trans-national or trans-institutional relocation of the leading H2SBM research team(s).
The number of citations an article received is a good indicator for its impact and contribution to research community. Based on the Web of Science, the total citations (7821) of the top 10 most cited papers count for 6.3% of all citations generated by 5881 H2SBM literatures, which reflects the importance of these papers. Nine from the 10 most highly cited articles were published in relatively higher–impact factor journals (IF > 5) except one from Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (IF = 2.47). The h-index, the number of published papers (N) that have been cited N or more times, is often used to assess the career-long citation impact of researchers [21,22]. One important finding was that PK Moore and R Wang had the highest h-index being 47 and 45 following a wide gap with other researchers in H2SBM research, reflecting their career-long important contribution and impact to the field.
It is noted that the ratio of review papers to research articles was about 1:6.2. This trend needs to be carefully assessed. In general, review papers generate higher citations than original research articles (Table 4). This fact partially stimulates the interests of certain journals and researchers to produce review papers more than focusing on original research articles. We have seen too many review articles repeating the same topics by the same or different authors without new data or new ideas. We have seen review articles that review other review articles. This is the time to call the attention for H2SBM researchers and also all other biomedical researchers to produce more original research articles and lesser redundant reviews.
Although open access journals provide easy access to the published papers, no evidence suggests that open access articles receive significantly more citations than non-open access articles [23]. This is the same situation as H2SBM papers. Only a small portion of H2SBM (6.1%) was published in open-access journals, and the average citation and h-index for open-access journal paper were much lower than that from non-open access journal papers. On the other hand, the concept of open access journals is relatively new and the citation impacts of newly published papers require some time to manifest themselves. Based on the data from Web of Science, the journal of Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity was the highest prolific open-access journal in H2SBM research with 44 publications since 2012, while the average citation per paper was only 4.16 dated on 15 October 2017. Scientific Reports, a new online open access journal, published 72 H2SBM articles from 2012 to 2016 (http://www.nature.com/srep/). However, this information could not be found in Web of Science.
In the bibliometric analysis completed, 98.6% of the 5881 publications found were published in English. This is not surprising since the majority of journals registered in Web of Science publish in English. In the top 10 countries that published the largest number of H2SBM, 4 countries are English-speaking, including USA, England, Canada, and Singapore, and total 48.7% publications were from these 4 countries. Of the 10 institutions that had the largest number of H2SBM publications, 6 were based in English-speaking countries.
The readers are reminded of the limitations of this study. Only publications indexed by Web of Science were analyzed. It is known that only a small part of existing journals were indexed in Web of Science. Certainly, some H2SBM publications are missed or not included in this analysis. This study did not look at the most cited institutes due to technique difficulty and time limitation. It is worth noting that University of Saskatchewan from Canada contributed 32 publications in H2SBM research, while its average citation per item (152.28) was more than 3 times of those from the top 10 most prolific institutes (Table 2), clearly pointing to a pioneer position of University of Saskatchewan in H2SBM research. Another limitation is that, besides the categories of article and review, other document categories (e.g., meeting abstracts, editorial materials, letters, and notes, etc.) were also included in this study, which usually did not give sufficient study details.
In conclusion, bibliometric analyses were performed to evaluate publication outcome related to H2SBM research at global level. An overall increase in H2SBM publications in the recent decades reflects the rapid advancement of this field. In the years to come there will be a continued increase in the productions of H2SBM research, probably with a similar trend observed in recent decades.
Acknowledgments
L.W. is the recipient of a Mid-Career Investigator Award from Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario, Canada. This research is supported by a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to G.Y. and a Grant-in-aid (G-16-00014249) from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada to L.W. The authors have no relevant disclosures. There was no commercial funding for this study.
Author Contributions
G.Y. collected and analyzed the data, G.Y. and L.W. wrote and revised the paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Zhao W., Zhang J., Lu Y., Wang R. The vasorelaxant effect of H2S as a novel endogenous gaseous KATP channel opener. EMBO J. 2001;20:6008–6016. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.21.6008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang R. Two’s company, three’s a crowd: Can H2S be the third endogenous gaseous transmitter? FASEB J. 2002;16:1792–1798. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0211hyp. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Abe K., Kimura H. The possible role of hydrogen sulfide as an endogenous neuromodulator. J. Neurosci. 1996;16:1066–1071. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-03-01066.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yang G., Wu L., Jiang B., Yang W., Qi J., Cao K., Meng Q., Mustafa A.K., Mu W., Zhang S., et al. H2S as a physiologic vasorelaxant: Hypertension in mice with deletion of cystathionine gamma-lyase. Science. 2008;322:587–590. doi: 10.1126/science.1162667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hosoki R., Matsuki N., Kimura H. The possible role of hydrogen sulfide as an endogenous smooth muscle relaxant in synergy with nitric oxide. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997;237:527–531. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Szabó C. Hydrogen sulphide and its therapeutic potential. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007;6:917–935. doi: 10.1038/nrd2425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Elrod J.W., Calvert J.W., Morrison J., Doeller J.E., Kraus D.W., Tao L., Jiao X., Scalia R., Kiss L., Szabo C., et al. Hydrogen sulfide attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by preservation of mitochondrial function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:15560–15565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705891104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang R. Physiological implications of hydrogen sulfide: A whiff exploration that blossomed. Physiol. Rev. 2012;92:791–896. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00017.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li L., Rose P., Moore P.K. Hydrogen sulfide and cell signaling. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2011;51:169–187. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010510-100505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kimura Y., Kimura H. Hydrogen sulfide protects neurons from oxidative stress. FASEB J. 2004;18:1165–1167. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-1815fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang R. Gasotransmitters: Growing pains and joys. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2014;39:227–232. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang R. Hydrogen sulfide: The third gasotransmitter in biology and medicine. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2010;12:1061–1064. doi: 10.1089/ars.2009.2938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kimura H. H2S2014 in Kyoto: The 3rd international conference on H2S in biology and medicine. Nitric Oxide. 2015;46:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2014.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Calvert J.W. The summer of hydrogen sulfide: Highlights from two international conferences. Med. Gas Res. 2013;3:5. doi: 10.1186/2045-9912-3-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Robert C., Wilson C.S., Venuta A., Ferrari M., Arreto C.D. Evolution of the scientific literature on drug delivery: A 1974–2015 bibliometric study. J. Control. Release. 2017;260:226–233. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Garner R.M., Hirsch J.A., Albuquerque F.C., Fargen K.M. Bibliometric indices: Defining academic productivity and citation rates of researchers, departments and journals. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2017 doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Falagas M.E., Pitsouni E.I., Malietzis G.A., Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22:338–342. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tetsworth K., Fraser D., Glatt V., Hohmann E. Use of Google Scholar public profiles in orthopedics. J. Orthop. Surg. (Hong Kong) 2017;25 doi: 10.1177/2309499017690322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chua S.K., Qureshi A.M., Krishnan V., Pai D.R., Kamal L.B., Gunasegaran S., Afzal M.Z., Ambawatta L., Gan J.Y., Kew P.Y., et al. The impact factor of an open access journal does not contribute to an article’s citations. F1000Research. 2017;6:208. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10892.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mustafa A.K., Gadalla M.M., Sen N., Kim S., Mu W., Gazi S.K., Barrow R.K., Yang G., Wang R., Snyder S.H. H2S signals through protein S-sulfhydration. Sci. Signal. 2009;2:ra72. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Baldock C., Ma R., Orton C.G. Point/counterpoint. The h-index is the best measure of a scientist’s research productivity. Med. Phys. 2009;36:1043–1045. doi: 10.1118/1.3089421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Callaham M., Wears R.L., Weber E. Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA. 2002;287:2847–2850. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tahamtan I., Safipour A., Ahamdzadeh K. Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics. 2016;107:1195–1225. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]