Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2017 Sep 12;22(9):1526. doi: 10.3390/molecules22091526

Evaluation of the Molecular Structural Parameters of Normal Rice Starch and Their Relationships with Its Thermal and Digestion Properties

Lingshang Lin 1,2, Qing Zhang 1,2, Long Zhang 1,2, Cunxu Wei 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC6151547  PMID: 28895935

Abstract

The molecular structural parameters of six normal rice starches with different amylose contents were investigated through their iodine absorption spectra and gel permeation chromatography of fully branched and debranched starches. The thermal and digestion properties of starches were also determined and their relationships with molecular structural parameters were analyzed. Results showed that the molecular structural parameters of maximum absorption wavelength, blue value (BV), optical density 620 nm/550 nm (OD 620/550), amylose, intermediate component, and amylopectin, including its short branch-chains, long branch-chains, and branching degree, had high correlation in different determining methods. The intermediate component of starch was significantly positively related to amylose and negatively related to amylopectin, and the amylopectin branching degree was significantly positively related to amylopectin content and negatively related to amylose content. The gelatinization temperatures and enthalpy of native starch were significantly positively related to BV, OD 620/550, and amylose content and negatively related to amylopectin short branch-chains. The gelatinization temperatures and enthalpy of retrograded starch were significantly negatively related to amylopectin branching degree. The digestions of gelatinized and retrograded starches were significantly negatively related to the BV, OD 620/550, amylose, and intermediate component and positively related to amylopectin and its short branch-chains and branching degree.

Keywords: starch, molecular structural parameters, thermal properties, digestion properties, correlation analysis

1. Introduction

Starch contains two main glucan polymers in its molecular structure: highly branched amylopectin and mainly linear amylose [1]. The molecular structure has significant effects on the thermal and digestion properties of starch, which are the two important functional properties that determine its applications in the food and non-food industries [2,3].

The molecular structure of starch includes the content and molecular weight distribution of amylose and amylopectin and is normally analyzed using the corresponding iodine absorption spectra and gel permeation chromatography (GPC) of fully branched and debranched starch [1,2,3]. Amylose and amylopectin have different iodine affinity values, producing starches that exhibit different iodine absorption spectra according to the different contents and molecular weight distributions of amylose and amylopectin [1,4]. Normally, the starch-iodine absorption spectrum is converted to maximum absorption wavelength (λmax), blue value (BV, absorbance at 680 nm), optical density 620 nm/550 nm ratio (OD 620/550), and apparent amylose content (AAC) [1,4,5]. Amylose can complex the lipid in starch, and the long branch-chains of amylopectin have iodine affinity properties similar to amylose. Therefore, AAC frequently underestimates or overestimates the amylose content (AC) of starch [6]. GPC can detect the molecular weight distribution of starch. For fully branched starch, GPC can separate starch into two fractions, amylopectin and amylose, or three fractions, amylopectin, intermediate component, and amylose [7]. For debranched starch, GPC can separate starch into three fractions, amylopectin short branch-chains, amylopectin long branch-chains, and amylose [8]. Though the molecular structures of starches have been reported in many papers, the molecular structural parameters derived from different analytical methods, which reflect different structural information, are seldom compared in previous works.

The thermal properties of starch are important indicators of starch quality. The morphology, size, molecular structure, and crystalline structure of starch all have significant effects on its thermal properties [9,10,11]. Starch contains three components: rapidly digestible starch (RDS), slowly digestible starch (SDS), and resistant starch (RS), according to their hydrolysis rates. The digestion properties of native starches are influenced by their morphologies, sizes, components, and crystalline structures but those of gelatinized and retrograded starches are affected mainly by their molecular structures [11,12,13,14]. For the starch applications, interrelationship between molecular structure and thermal and digestion properties must be understood. However, few papers report the relationships between thermal and digestion properties and molecular structural parameters derived from different analytical methods in one paper.

In this study, we determined and compared many molecular structural parameters of six normal rice starches using their iodine absorption spectra and GPC. The thermal and digestion properties of starches were also investigated and their relationships with molecular structural parameters were analyzed. Our objective is to evaluate the molecular structural parameters of starch and their relationships with functional properties and provide important information for starch application through determining the molecular structural parameters.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Molecular Structural Parameters of Starch

The absorption spectra of starch–iodine complexes were clearly different among the six rice starches (Figure 1). λmax is related to the polymerization degree and average chain length of amylose and amylopectin. BV reflects the iodine affinity of starch [1,4]. OD 620/550 can indicate the relative content of longer chain segments in starch [5]. AAC reflects the iodine absorbance from both amylose and small amount of amylopectin with longer branch-chains and is commonly assessed from the absorbance value at 620 nm [15]. The λmax, BV, OD 620/550 nm, and AAC of starches are presented in Table 1 and ranged from 599.2 nm to 612.3 nm, 0.166 to 0.334, 1.150 to 1.305, and 10.4% to 27.9% in six rice varieties with the lowest value in Changjiang II and the highest value in Teqing.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Iodine absorbance spectra of starches.

Table 1.

Iodine absorbance spectrum parameters of starches a.

Rice Variety λmax (nm) BV b OD 620/550 AAC (%) b
Changjiang II 599.2 ± 0.8 a 0.166 ± 0.004 a 1.150 ± 0.007 a 10.4 ± 0.4 a
9311 605.8 ± 0.6 b 0.211 ± 0.001 b 1.219 ± 0.001 b 15.5 ± 0.4 b
Wuyunjing 8 607.8 ± 0.6 bc 0.243 ± 0.001 c 1.225 ± 0.013 bc 18.4 ± 0.2 c
Huanghuazhan 609.8 ± 1.0 cd 0.255 ± 0.004 d 1.264 ± 0.019 cd 19.6 ± 0.4 d
Guihuahuang 610.2 ± 2.8 cd 0.300 ± 0.004 e 1.273 ± 0.033 d 24.7 ± 0.3 e
Teqing 612.3 ± 0.6 d 0.334 ± 0.002 f 1.305 ± 0.015 d 27.9 ± 0.4 f
Open in a new tab

a Data are the means ± standard deviations, n = 3. Values in the same column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). b BV, blue value; AAC, apparent amylose content.

The molecular weight distributions of fully branched starches are shown in Figure 2. Two starch fractions, amylopectin and amylose, are generally detected in the Sepharose CL-2B GPC profile of fully branched starch [7,14]. Several studies also divide the Sepharose CL-2B GPC profile of fully branched starch into three fractions: high, intermediate, and low molecular fraction. The high and low molecular fractions are mostly amylopectin and amylose, respectively, and the intermediate molecular fraction (intermediate component) is between amylopectin and amylose [16,17]. In this study, the fully branched starch was divided into three fractions according to elution times. The starches in the fractions 17–25, 26–39, and 40–60 were the high, intermediate, and low molecular fragments, respectively, and their contents were significantly different among the six rice starches (Table 2). Changjiang II starch had the highest amylopectin and lowest intermediate component and amylose content, and Teqing starch had the lowest amylopectin content and highest intermediate component and amylose content.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

GPC profiles of fully branched starches.

Table 2.

Molecular weight distributions of fully branched and debranched starches a.

Rice Variety Fully Branched Starch Debranched Starch
AP (%) b IC (%) b ACB (%) b AP-S (%) c AP-L (%) c ACD (%) c AP-S/L c
Changjiang II 87.1 ± 0.7 d 6.6 ± 0.6 a 6.3 ± 0.3 a 68.7 ± 0.2 d 21.1 ± 0.2 a 10.2 ± 0.1 a 3.25 ± 0.04 c
9311 85.2 ± 1.2 d 6.7 ± 0.6 a 8.0 ± 1.0 a 63.6 ± 0.9 c 20.8 ± 0.4 a 15.6 ± 1.3 b 3.05 ± 0.01 bc
Wuyunjing 8 79.0 ± 0.7 b 8.6 ± 0.6 bc 12.4 ± 0.4 bc 61.1 ± 1.2 c 20.5 ± 0.6 a 18.4 ± 0.6 c 2.98 ± 0.15 bc
Huanghuazhan 81.8 ± 0.7 c 7.5 ± 0.6 ab 10.7 ± 0.8 b 61.9 ± 0.7 c 20.7 ± 0.4 a 17.5 ± 1.1 bc 3.00 ± 0.02 bc
Guihuahuang 76.9 ± 0.9 b 8.8 ± 1.0 bc 14.3 ± 1.9 cd 58.7 ± 0.7 b 20.1 ± 0.4 a 21.2 ± 0.3 d 2.92 ± 0.09 b
Teqing 74.3 ± 1.2 a 9.2 ± 0.4 c 16.4 ± 1.2 d 53.8 ± 0.4 a 20.2 ± 0.2 a 26.0 ± 0.2 e 2.66 ± 0.05 a
Open in a new tab

a Data are the means ± standard deviations, n = 3. Values in the same column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). b AP, IC, and ACB are the content of amylopectin, intermediate component, and amylose of fully branched starch, respectively. c AP-S, AP-L, and ACD are the content of amylopectin short branch-chains, amylopectin long branch-chains, and amylose of debranched starch, respectively. AP-S/L is the content ratio of amylopectin short to long branch-chains.

The GPC chromatograms of debranched starches are shown in Figure 3 and showed three clear peaks. Peak 1 consists of amylopectin short branch-chains (A and short B chains), peak 2 contains amylopectin long branch-chains (long B chains), and peak 3 is amylose [8]. The branching degree of amylopectin can be reflected by the area ratio of peak 1 to peak 2; the ratio increased with increasing branching degree [18]. The contents of amylopectin short branch-chains, amylopectin long branch-chains, and amylose and the area ratio of peak 1 to peak 2 in six rice starches are summarized in Table 2 and ranged from 53.8% to 68.7%, 20.2% to 21.1%, 10.2% to 26.0%, and 2.66% to 3.25%, respectively.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

GPC chromatograms of isoamylase-debranched starch.

2.2. Correlation among Different Molecular Structural Parameters of Starch

The correlations among different molecular structural parameters are shown in Table 3. The λmax, BV, OD 620/550, and AAC derived from starch–iodine absorbance spectrum had highly positive correlation (p < 0.01), and were all positively related to amylose (ACB and ACD) (p < 0.05) and negatively related to amylopectin (AP, AP-S, AP-L) and branching degree (AP-S/L) (p < 0.05). For molecular weight distribution of fully branched starch determined by sepharose CL-2B GPC, amylopectin content had significantly negative correlation with the contents of intermediate component and amylose (p < 0.01), and intermediate component showed high correlation with ACB (p < 0.01). Similar correlation was also reported in previous studies [19,20]. For molecular weight distribution of debranched starch, the short branch-chains, long branch-chains, and branching degree of amylopectin had positive correlation (p < 0.05) and were all negatively related to amylose (ACD) (p < 0.05). The results are in agreement with previous reports in rice [21,22]. Both intermediate component and ACB derived from Sepharose CL-2B GPC were positively related to amylose (ACD) derived from debranched starch (p < 0.05) but negatively related to the short branch-chain, long branch-chain, and branching degree of amylopectin (p < 0.05). Similar relationship is also reported in maize starch [3]. The above mentioned results indicated that the different molecular structural parameters determined by different methods had high correlation and reflected different structural information of starch.

Table 3.

Pearson correlation coefficients between molecular structural parameters of starches a.

λmax BV OD 620/550 AAC AP IC ACB AP-S AP-L ACD
BV 0.936 **
OD 620/550 0.983 ** 0.962 **
AAC 0.936 ** 0.999 ** 0.963 **
AP ‒0.873 * ‒0.960 ** ‒0.870 * ‒0.956 **
IC 0.798 0.899 * 0.778 0.893 * ‒0.985 **
ACB 0.890 * 0.973 ** 0.892 * 0.969 ** ‒0.999 ** 0.976 **
AP-S −0.878 * −0.945 ** −0.876 * −0.949 ** 0.947 ** −0.919 ** −0.965 **
AP-L −0.929 ** −0.979 ** −0.945 ** −0.979 ** 0.954 ** −0.897 * −0.949 ** 0.904 *
ACD 0.931 ** 0.983 ** 0.946 ** 0.983 ** −0.959 ** 0.904 * 0.970 ** −1.000 ** −0.917 *
AP-S/L −0.906 * −0.955 ** −0.929 ** −0.953 ** 0.921 ** −0.858 * −0.934 ** 0.992 ** 0.842 * −0.987 **
Open in a new tab

a The abbreviations are shown in Table 1 and Table 2. * and ** indicate the significance at the p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 levels, respectively.

2.3. Thermal Properties of Native and Retrograded Starches

The DSC thermograms of native and retrograded starches are presented in Figure 4 and their thermal parameters are listed in Table 4. The native starches of six rice varieties displayed different gelatinization temperatures but similar enthalpy. After storage at 4 °C for seven days, the gelatinization temperatures of retrograded starch were lower than those of native starch, indicating that the crystallites in retrograded starch were gelatinized more easily than those in native starch. The gelatinization temperatures of retrograded starches did not vary considerably among six rice starches, suggesting similarities in the melting behavior of crystallites in retrograded starch, but gelatinization enthalpy and retro% had significant difference, which is consistent with previous results [23,24].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

DSC thermograms of native starches (A) and retrograded starches (B).

Table 4.

Thermal parameters of native and retrograded starches a.

Rice Variety Native Starch Retrograded Starch
To (°C) b Tp (°C) b Tc (°C) b ΔT (°C) b ΔH (J/g) b To (°C) Tp (°C) Tc (°C) ΔT (°C) ΔH (J/g) Retro (%) b
Changjiang II 56.1 ± 0.2 a 63.1 ± 0.4 a 72.5 ± 0.6 a 16.5 ± 0.8 d 9.88 ± 0.05 a 47.2 ± 1.6 a 54.8 ± 1.2 a 60.2 ± 1.3 a 13.0 ± 0.3 a 1.86 ± 0.02 a 18.8 ± 0.1 a
9311 58.4 ± 0.6 bc 64.7 ± 0.1 b 72.3 ± 0.4 a 13.9 ± 0.2 ab 10.01 ± 0.08 a 47.3 ± 3.1 a 55.2 ± 1.1 a 61.0 ± 0.5 a 13.7 ± 2.6 a 2.74 ± 0.30 ab 27.4 ± 3.2 b
Wuyunjing 8 58.1 ± 0.1 b 64.8 ± 0.1 b 73.2 ± 0.4 ab 15.1 ± 0.4 bcd 10.19 ± 0.47 a 47.2 ± 1.5 a 55.4 ± 1.2 a 60.7 ± 0.4 a 13.5 ± 1.1 a 2.03 ± 0.32 a 19.9 ± 2.2 a
Huanghuazhan 59.2 ± 0.1 cd 65.7 ± 0.1 c 74.1 ± 0.2 b 14.9 ± 0.3 bc 10.29 ± 0.43 a 47.3 ± 1.7 a 55.8 ± 0.8 a 61.5 ± 0.2 a 14.2 ± 1.5 a 3.06 ± 0.03 b 29.8 ± 1.6 b
Guihuahuang 59.7 ± 0.1 d 66.3 ± 0.1 d 75.2 ± 0.1 c 15.5 ± 0.1 cd 10.48 ± 0.09 a 47.3 ± 1.1 a 55.5 ± 1.0 a 61.3 ± 0.1 a 14.0 ± 1.1 a 3.13 ± 0.14 b 29.8 ± 1.1 b
Teqing 66.8 ± 0.2 e 72.2 ± 0.1 e 79.4 ± 0.1 d 12.7 ± 0.2 a 10.36 ± 0.13 a 48.3 ± 0.9 a 56.6 ± 0.4 a 64.2 ± 0.1 b 15.9 ± 1.0 a 6.41 ± 0.46 c 61.9 ± 3.6 c
Open in a new tab

a Data are the means ± standard deviations, n = 3. Values in the same column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). b To, gelatinization onset temperature; Tp, gelatinization peak temperature; Tc, gelatinization conclusion temperature; ΔT, gelatinization temperature range (Tc–To); ΔH, gelatinization enthalpy; Retro, the 100% ΔH of dissociation of retrograded starch/ΔH of starch gelatinization.

2.4. Correlation between Molecular Structural Parameters and Thermal Properties of Starch

The correlations between molecular structural parameters and thermal parameters of rice starches are presented in Table 5. The gelatinization temperatures of native starches and the peak temperatures of retrograded starches were significantly positively related to BV and AC (p < 0.05), but negatively related to amylopectin short branch-chains and branching degree (p < 0.05). These data partly contradicted the previous studies. Park et al. found that gelatinization temperature correlated positively with AC and amylopectin long branch-chain, but no significant correlation was observed between gelatinization properties and amylopectin short branch-chains [10]. However, further studies showed that gelatinization temperature was significantly positively related to AC and negatively related to amylopectin short branch-chains [11,25,26]. In the present study, the gelatinization enthalpy of native starch was significantly positively related to λmax, BV, OD 620/550, and AC (p < 0.05) but negatively related to intermediate component and amylopectin, including short and long branch-chains (p < 0.05). However, the enthalpy and retro% of retrograded starch were only significantly positively related to amylose (ACD) and negatively related to amylopectin short branch-chains and branching degree (p < 0.05) (Table 5). Shi and Seib reported that amylopectin short branch-chains inhibited the retrogradation of starch [27].

Table 5.

Pearson correlation coefficients between molecular structural parameters and thermal properties of starches a.

λmax BV OD 620/550 AAC AP IC ACB AP-S AP-L ACD AP-S/L
N-To 0.757 0.860 * 0.828 * 0.857 * ‒0.796 0.716 0.815 * −0.906 * −0.674 0.896 * ‒0.946 **
N-Tp 0.757 0.873 * 0.831 * 0.869 * −0.814 * 0.738 0.832 * −0.911 * −0.693 0.901 * ‒0.947 **
N-Tc 0.717 0.880 * 0.800 0.873 * −0.842 * 0.780 0.855 * −0.885 * −0.720 0.879 * −0.908 *
N-ΔT −0.659 −0.619 −0.691 −0.623 0.518 −0.421 −0.543 0.737 0.424 −0.720 0.801
N-ΔH 0.904 * 0.921 ** 0.902 * 0.921 ** −0.883 * −0.834 * 0.893 * −0.840 * −0.950 ** 0.853 * −0.775
R-To 0.557 0.706 0.658 0.701 −0.637 0.558 0.656 −0.764 −0.481 0.749 −0.827 *
R-Tp 0.876 * 0.901 * 0.917 * 0.893 * −0.827 * 0.740 0.849 * −0.926 ** −0.713 0.916 * −0.955 **
R-Tc 0.722 0.820 * 0.804 0.815 * −0.738 0.648 0.760 −0.863 * −0.606 0.850 * −0.912 *
R-ΔT 0.780 0.856 * 0.852 * 0.851 * −0.769 0.675 0.792 −0.891 * −0.649 0.880 * −0.934 **
R-ΔH 0.689 0.807 0.784 0.804 −0.713 0.619 0.737 −0.845 * −0.598 0.833 * −0.893 *
Retro 0.675 0.792 0.770 0.789 −0.696 0.601 0.720 −0.833 * −0.578 0.820 * −0.884 *
Open in a new tab

a The N-To, Tp, Tc, ΔT and ΔH are the DSC parameters of native starch; the R-To, Tp, Tc, ΔT and ΔH are the DSC parameters of retrograded starch, and the other abbreviations are shown in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 4. * and ** indicate the significance at the p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 levels, respectively.

2.5. In Vitro Digestion Properties of Gelatinized and Retrograded Starches

In vitro digestion properties of gelatinized and retrograded starches by both α-amylase from porcine pancreatic (PPA) and amyloglucosidase from Aspergillus niger (AAG) are shown in Table 6. The RDS, SDS, and RS in six rice varieties ranged from 73.6% to 83.7%, 8.9% to 9.7%, and 7.3% to 15.0% in gelatinized starches and 68.7% to 76.7%, 7.5% to 10.1%, and 15.2% to 22.8% in retrograded starches, respectively. The retrogradation of gelatinized starch can significantly increase the resistance to in vitro digestion [21,28].

Table 6.

Digestion properties of gelatinized and retrograded starches a.

Rice Variety Gelatinized Starch Retrograded Starch
RDS (%) b SDS (%) b RS (%) b RDS (%) SDS (%) RS (%)
Changjiang II 83.7 ± 1.0 d 8.9 ± 0.6 a 7.3 ± 0.9 a 76.7 ± 1.3 d 7.6 ± 1.0 a 15.7 ± 0.3 a
9311 81.1 ± 0.6 c 9.4 ± 0.1 a 9.5 ± 0.6 b 76.6 ± 0.6 d 7.5 ± 0.3 a 15.9 ± 0.8 a
Wuyunjing 8 78.9 ± 0.4 b 9.6 ± 0.3 a 11.5 ± 0.1 c 73.5 ± 1.0 c 10.1 ± 0.6 b 16.5 ± 0.7 a
Huanghuazhan 80.7 ± 0.9 bc 9.4 ± 0.3 a 9.9 ± 0.6 b 74.7 ± 0.3 c 10.1 ± 0.6 b 15.2 ± 0.8 a
Guihuahuang 78.9 ± 0.6 b 9.7 ± 0.5 a 11.4 ± 0.8 c 71.6 ± 0.6 b 10.0 ± 0.3 b 18.5 ± 0.5 b
Teqing 73.6 ± 0.9 a 11.4 ± 0.4 b 15.0 ± 0.4 d 68.7 ± 0.3 a 8.4 ± 0.2 a 22.8 ± 0.4 c
Open in a new tab

a Data are the means ± standard deviations, n = 3. Values in the same column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). b RDS, rapidly digestible starch; SDS, slowly digestible starch; RS, resistant starch.

2.6. Correlation between Molecular Structural Parameters and Digestion Properties of Starch

The correlation between molecular structural parameters and in vitro digestion properties of rice starches are presented in Table 7. The RDS of gelatinized and retrograded starches was significantly negatively related to BV, OD 620/550, AC, and intermediate component (p < 0.05) but positively related to amylopectin and its short branch-chains and branching degree (p < 0.01). The RS of gelatinized starches was significantly positively related to BV, OD 620/550, AC, and intermediate component (p < 0.05) but negatively related to amylopectin, including its short branch-chains, long branch-chains, and branching degree (p < 0.01). However, the RS of retrograded starches was only positively related to OD 680 and AC (p < 0.05) and negatively related to amylopectin short branch-chains and branching degree (p < 0.05). Several studies also showed that the digestibility of starch is significantly negatively related to AC but positively related to amylopectin short branch-chains [11,13,14,21]. For gelatinized starch, the leaching amylose complexes with lipids upon heating and reduces the enzyme susceptibility. Amylopectin short branch-chains are remarkably short for complex formation [29]. For retrograded starch, amylose that possess a more linear and flexible structure than amylopectin can form double helices (retrogradation) in a short time after gelatinization and has higher resistance toward amylase hydrolysis than amorphous starch [30]. Therefore, retrograded starch that contains high AC was digested more slowly than that with high content of amylopectin short branch-chains.

Table 7.

Pearson correlation coefficients between molecular structural parameters and in vitro digestion properties of starches a.

G-RDS G-SDS G-RS R-RDS R-SDS R-RS
λmax −0.830 * 0.723 0.853 * −0.799 0.575 0.603
BV −0.914 * 0.849 * 0.922 ** −0.947 ** 0.457 0.813 *
OD 620/550 −0.851 * 0.784 0.862 * −0.834 * 0.472 0.686
AAC −0.910 * 0.845 * 0.919 ** −0.942 ** 0.446 0.812 *
AP 0.920 ** −0.825 * −0.938 ** 0.972 ** −0.526 −0.810
IC −0.880 * 0.769 0.904 * −0.948 ** 0.552 0.772
ACB −0.927 ** 0.837 * 0.943 ** −0.973 ** 0.515 0.816 *
AP-S 0.970 ** −0.908 * −0.976 ** 0.943 ** −0.365 −0.849 *
AP-L 0.806 −0.686 −0.834 * 0.888 * −0.564 −0.703
ACD −0.964 ** 0.898 * 0.972 ** −0.945 ** 0.381 0.844 *
AP-S/L 0.984 ** −0.945 ** −0.983 ** 0.928 ** −0.284 −0.869 *
Open in a new tab

a The G-RDS, SDS and RS are the digestion properties of gelatinized starch, the R-RDS, SDS and RS are the digestion properties of retrograded starch, and the other abbreviations are shown in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 6. * and ** indicate the significance at the p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 levels, respectively.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Materials

Six normal rice varieties of 9311, Changjiang II, Guihuahuang, Huanghuazhan, Teqing, and Wuyunjing 8 were selected as plant materials in this study. The varieties of Changjiang II, Guihuahuang, and Wuyunjing 8 are Japonica rice and the others are Indica rice. They were grown in the experiment field of Yangzhou University (Yangzhou, China) in May 2015 and harvested in September 2015.

3.2. Isolation of Starch

Starch was isolated from mature brown seeds as previously described [31].

3.3. Measurements of Iodine Absorption Spectrum and AAC of Starch

The protein was removed from starch granules by using protease and sodium bisulfite. Starch was defatted with 85% (v/v) methanol and dissolved in urea dimethyl sulfoxide solution as previously described [32]. The iodine absorption spectrum of starch was determined using an Ultrospec 6300 pro spectrophotometer (Amersham Bioscience, Cambridge, UK), and AAC was measured from the absorbance at 620 nm as previously described [4].

3.4. Molecular Weight Distribution of Fully Branched Starch

The fully branched starch was analyzed as previously described [19] with some modifications. Eighteen milligrams of starch was treated using protease and sodium bisulfite to remove the protein from granules and dispersed in 1.8 mL DMSO at 80 °C overnight using a ThermoMixer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) at 350 rpm. Afterward, the sample was centrifuged (10 min, 4000× g). The supernatant (1 mL) was mixed with 4 mL of absolute ethanol to precipitate the starch, and the residual supernatant was used for subsequent debranched starch in Section 3.5. The precipitated starch was washed twice with ethanol and dispersed in warm deionized water (5 mL) and incubated for 30 min in boiling water. After cooling to room temperature, the sample was centrifuged (10 min, 4000× g) and the supernatant was sieved through a 5 μm filter. Two milliliters of supernatant was injected into a GPC column (1.6 cm × 50 cm) packed with Sepharose CL-2B (CL2B300 Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The column was eluted at 0.5 mL/min with 25 mM NaCl and 1 mM NaOH solution, and 1.5 mL fractions were collected. The quantity of carbohydrate was determined using anthrone-H2SO4 method.

3.5. Molecular Weight Distribution of Debranched Starch

The starch in the residual supernatant in Section 3.4 was debranched with isoamylase as previously described [33]. The debranched starch was analyzed by a high-temperature GPC system equipped with three columns (PL110-6100, 6300, 6525) and a differential refractive index detector (PL-GPC 220, Agilent Technologies UK Limited, Shropshire, UK) as previously described [28].

3.6. Thermal Property Analysis of Starch

The thermal properties of native starch were measured by a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC200-F3, NETZSCH, Selb, Germany) as previously described [28]. Five milligrams of starch and fifteen microliters of distilled water were mixed and sealed in an aluminum pan at 4 °C overnight. The sample was equilibrated at room temperature for 1 h and then heated to 130 °C at 10 °C/min. The gelatinized starch was retrograded at 4 °C for seven days and rescanned at the same condition as native starch.

3.7. In Vitro Digestion Analysis of Gelatinized and Retrograded Starch

The in vitro digestion of starch was determined using both PPA (A3176, Sigma) and AAG (E-AMGDF, Megazyme, Bray, Ireland) as previously described [34]. Briefly, native starch (10 mg) was gelatinized in a 10 mL centrifuge tube with 1 mL distilled water using ThermoMixer at 1000 rpm for 12 min at 98 °C. The gelatinized starch was recrystallized at 4 °C for 36 h for preparing the retrograded starch. The gelatinized or retrograded starch was equilibrated at 37 °C for 30 min, and 1 mL of enzyme solution (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, 6.7 mM NaCl, 0.01% NaN3, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 4 U PPA, 4 U AAG) was added in the centrifuge tube. The sample was incubated at 37 °C for 20 or 120 min using ThermoMixer at 1000 rpm, and then 240 μL of 0.1 M HCl and 2 mL of 50% ethanol were added immediately to terminate the hydrolysis. The sample was centrifuged (14,000× g, 5 min), and the glucose quantity in the supernatant was determined using the glucose assay kit (Megazyme, K-GLUC). The digested starches within 20 min and between 20 to 120 min were RDS and SDS, respectively, and the undigested starch at 120 min was RS.

3.8. Statistical Analysis

Analysis of variance of the means, comparisons of multiple means using Tukey’s multiple-range tests at p < 0.05, and Pearson’s bivariate correlations were performed using SPSS 19.0 software (IBM Company, Chicago, IL, USA).

4. Conclusions

The molecular structural parameters of starch measured by different methods could reflect different structural information and had significant correlation. The intermediate component of starch was significantly positively related to amylose and negatively related to amylopectin including its short branch-chains, long branch-chains, and branching degree. The gelatinization temperatures of native starches and peak temperature of retrograded starches were significantly positively related to BV, OD 620/550, and AC and negatively related to amylopectin, including its short branch-chains and branching degree. The gelatinization enthalpy and retro% of retrograded starch were significantly negatively related to amylopectin short branch-chains and branching degree and positively related to AC of debranched starches. The resistance of starch to in vitro digestion could be increased by the BV, OD 620/550, AC, and intermediate component and decreased by amylopectin, including its short branch-chains and branching degree.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20160461), Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province, Talent Project of Yangzhou University, and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File 1
Click here for additional data file. (94.3KB, pdf)

Author Contributions

C.W. and L.Z. conceived the study; C.W. designed the experiments; L.L., Q.Z. and L.Z. performed the experiments; C.W. and L.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the contents of the manuscript and approved the submission.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

Footnotes

Sample Availability: Samples of the six rice starches are available from the authors.

References

  • 1.Lin L., Guo D., Zhao L., Zhang X., Wang J., Zhang F., Wei C. Comparative structure of starches from high-amylose maize inbred lines and their hybrids. Food Hydrocoll. 2016;52:19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.06.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lin L., Guo D., Huang J., Zhang X., Zhang L., Wei C. Molecular structure and enzymatic hydrolysis properties of starches from high-amylose maize inbred lines and their hybrids. Food Hydrocoll. 2016;58:246–254. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lin L., Cai C., Gilbert R.G., Li E., Wang J., Wei C. Relationships between amylopectin molecular structures and functional properties of different-sized fractions of normal and high-amylose maize starches. Food Hydrocoll. 2016;52:359–368. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.07.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Man J., Lin L., Wang Z., Wang Y., Liu Q., Wei C. Different structures of heterogeneous starch granules from high-amylose rice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014;62:11254–11263. doi: 10.1021/jf503999r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shaik S.S., Carciofi M., Martens H.J., Hebelstrup K.H., Blennow A. Starch bioengineering affects cereal grain germination and seedling establishment. J. Exp. Bot. 2014;65:2257–2270. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hoover R. Composition, molecular structure, and physicochemical properties of tuber and root starches: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2001;45:253–267. doi: 10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00260-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alves F.V., Polesi L.F., Aguiar C.L., Sarmento S.B.S. Structural and physicochemical characteristics of starch from sugar cane and sweet sorghum stalks. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014;111:592–597. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Song Y., Jane J. Characterization of barley starches of waxy, normal, and high amylose varieties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2000;41:365–377. doi: 10.1016/S0144-8617(99)00098-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cooke D., Gidley M.J. Loss of crystalline and molecular order during starch gelatinisation: Origin of the enthalpic transition. Carbohydr. Res. 1992;227:103–112. doi: 10.1016/0008-6215(92)85063-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Park I.M., Ibáñez A.M., Zhong F., Shoemaker C.F. Gelatinization and pasting properties of waxy and non-waxy rice starches. Starch. 2007;59:388–396. doi: 10.1002/star.200600570. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chung H.J., Liu Q., Lee L., Wei D. Relationship between the structure, physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility of rice starches with different amylose contents. Food Hydrocoll. 2011;25:968–975. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.09.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Benmoussa M., Moldenhauer K.A.K., Hamaker B.R. Rice amylopectin fine structure variability affects starch digestion properties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007;55:1475–1479. doi: 10.1021/jf062349x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang W., Bi J., Yan X., Wang H., Zhu C., Wang J., Wan J. In vitro measurement of resistant starch of cooked milled rice and physico-chemical characteristics affecting its formation. Food Chem. 2007;105:462–468. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhu L., Liu Q., Wilson J.D., Gu M., Shi Y.C. Digestibility and physicochemical properties of rice (Oryza sativa L.) flours and starches differing in amylose content. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011;86:1751–1759. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nishi A., Nakamura Y., Tanaka N., Satoh H. Biochemical and genetic analysis of the effects of amylose-extender mutation in rice endosperm. Plant Physiol. 2001;127:459–472. doi: 10.1104/pp.010127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhang Z., Zhao S., Xiong S. Morphology and physicochemical properties of mechanically activated rice starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010;79:341–348. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.08.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pinto V.Z., Vanier N.L., Deon V.G., Moomand K., El Halal S.L.M., da Rosa Zavareze E., Lin L.T., Dias A.R.G. Effects of single and dual physical modifications on pinhão starch. Food Chem. 2015;187:98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang Y.J., White P.J., Pollak L., Jane J. Characterization of starch structures of 17 maize endosperm mutant genotypes with Oh43 inbred line background. Cereal Chem. 1993;70:171–179. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li L., Jiang H., Campbell M., Blanco M., Jane J.L. Characterization of maize amylose-extender (ae) mutant starches. Part I: Relationship between resistant starch contents and molecular structures. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008;74:396–404. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.03.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jiang H., Campbell M., Wu Y., Du S., Srichuwong S., Jane J.L. Dosage effect of high-amylose modifier gene(s) on the starch structure of maize amylose-extender mutant. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015;63:433–439. doi: 10.1021/jf504099x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cai J., Man J., Huang J., Liu Q., Wei W., Wei C. Relationship between structure and functional properties of normal rice starches with different amylose contents. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015;125:35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.02.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang C., Chen S., Ren X., Lu Y., Liu D., Cai X., Li Q., Gao J., Liu Q. Molecular structure and physicochemical properties of starches from rice with different amylose contents resulting from modification of OsGBSSI activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017;65:2222–2232. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chung H.J., Lim H.S., Lim S.T. Effect of partial gelatinization and retrogradation on the enzymatic digestion of waxy rice starch. J. Cereal Sci. 2006;43:353–359. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2005.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wu Y., Chen Z., Li X., Wang Z. Retrogradation properties of high amylose rice flour and rice starch by physical modification. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2010;43:492–497. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2009.09.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vandeputte G.E., Vermeylen R., Geeroms J., Delcour J.A. Rice starches. I. Structural aspects provide insight into crystallinity characteristics and gelatinisation behaviour of granular starch. J. Cereal Sci. 2003;38:43–52. doi: 10.1016/S0733-5210(02)00140-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wu Y., Chen Z., Li X., Li M. Effect of tea polyphenols on the retrogradation of rice starch. Food Res. Int. 2009;42:221–225. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2008.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shi Y.C., Seib P.A. The structure of four waxy starches related to gelatinization and retrogradation. Carbohydr. Res. 1992;227:131–145. doi: 10.1016/0008-6215(92)85066-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cai J., Cai C., Man J., Zhou W., Wei C. Structural and functional properties of C-type starches. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014;101:289–300. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Frei M., Siddhuraju P., Becker K. Studies on the in vitro starch digestibility and the glycemic index of six different indigenous rice cultivars from the Philippines. Food Chem. 2003;83:395–402. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00101-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Syahariza Z.A., Sar S., Hasjim J., Tizzotti M.J., Gilbert R.G. The importance of amylose and amylopectin fine structures for starch digestibility in cooked rice grains. Food Chem. 2013;136:742–749. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.08.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wei C., Xu B., Qin F., Yu H., Chen C., Meng X., Zhu L., Wang Y., Gu M., Liu Q. C-type starch from high-amylose rice resistant starch granules modified by antisense RNA inhibition of starch branching enzyme. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010;58:7383–7388. doi: 10.1021/jf100385m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Konik-Rose C., Thistleton J., Chanvrier H., Tan I., Halley P., Gidley M., Kosar-Hashemi B., Wang H., Larroque O., Ikea J., et al. Effects of starch synthase IIa gene dosage on grain, protein and starch in endosperm of wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007;115:1053–1065. doi: 10.1007/s00122-007-0631-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tran T.T.B., Shelat K.J., Tang D., Li E., Gilbert R.G., Hasjim J. Milling of rice grains. The degradation on three structural levels of starch in rice flour can be independently controlled during grinding. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011;59:3964–3973. doi: 10.1021/jf105021r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Huang L., Lin L., Wang J., Wang Z., Liu Q., Wei C. In vitro digestion properties of heterogeneous starch granules from high-amylose rice. Food Hydrocoll. 2016;54:1022. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.09.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File 1
Click here for additional data file. (94.3KB, pdf)

Articles from Molecules : A Journal of Synthetic Chemistry and Natural Product Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES