Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 7.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Chem. 2017 Oct 18;89(21):11846–11852. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03582

High-Precision Simultaneous 18O/16O, 13C/12C, and 17O/16O Analyses for Microgram Quantities of CaCO3 by Tunable Infrared Laser Absorption Spectroscopy

Saburo Sakai †,‡,§,*, Shinichi Matsuda , Toshihide Hikida , Akio Shimono , J Barry McManus #, Mark Zahniser #, David Nelson #, David L Dettman §, Danzhou Yang , Naohiko Ohkouchi
PMCID: PMC6152922  NIHMSID: NIHMS989054  PMID: 28937751

Abstract

Stable isotope ratios (18O/16O, 13C/12C, and 17O/16O) in carbonates have contributed greatly to the understanding of Earth and planetary systems, climates, and history. The current method for measuring isotopologues of CO2 derived from CaCO3 is primarily gas-source isotope ratio mass spectroscopy (IRMS). However, IRMS has drawbacks, such as mass overlap by multiple CO2 isotopologues and contaminants, the requirement of careful sample purification, and the use of major instrumentation needing permanent installation and a high power electrical supply. Here, we report simultaneous 18O/16O, 13C/12C, and 17O/16O analyses for microgram quantities of CaCO3 using a tunable mid-infrared laser absorption spectroscopy (TILDAS) system, which has no mass overlap problem and yields high sensitivity/precision measurements on small samples, as small as 0.02 μmol of CO2 (equivalent to 2 μg of CaCO3) with standard errors of less than 0.08 ‰ for 18O/16O and 13C/12C (±0.136 ‰ and ±0.387 ‰ repeatability; n = 10). In larger samples of CO2, 0.68 μmol (or 68 μg of CaCO3), standard error is less than 0.04 ‰ for 18O/16O and 13C/12C (< ±0.1 ‰ repeatability; n = 10) and 0.03 ‰ for 17O/16O (±0.069 ‰ repeatability; n = 10). We also show, for the first time, the relationship between 17O/16O ratios measured using the TILDAS system and published δ17O values of international standard materials (NBS-18 and −19) measured by IRMS. The benchtop TILDAS system, with cryogen-free sample preparation vacuum lines for microgram quantities of carbonates, is therefore a significant advance in carbonate stable isotope ratio geochemistry and is a new alternative to conventional IRMS.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-989054-f0001.jpg


Light-element stable isotope ratios have made major contributions to the understanding of Earth systems, climates, and geologic history. In particular, the stable isotope ratios of oxygen and carbon (δ18O and δ13C) in biogenic and sedimentary carbonates have been used to reconstruct highly detailed histories of climate on the Earth and played an outsized role in the discussion of the Earth’s temperature, ocean salinity, sea level, ice-sheet volume changes, and carbon cycles.1 Recent studies have suggested that the 17O excess (Δ17O) in carbonates has great potential as a new paleo-environmental proxy.2 Gas-source isotope ratio mass spectroscopy (IRMS) has been the dominant method for measurement of δ18O, δ13C, and δ17O in carbonates for many decades. However, IRMS systems are expensive and have some operational drawbacks, such as relatively elaborate sample preparation and purification, dedicated laboratory space, and the requirement of dedicated high power lines.

In recent years, laser spectroscopy has increasingly become an alternative to conventional IRMS for the measurement of isotopic ratios in atmospheric CO2.311 Laser systems use the mid-IR spectral region, which allows particularly high-sensitivity isotopic measurements, because CO2 exhibits highly characteristic rotational−vibrational bands of strong fundamental vibrations in this region. Sensitivity can be further enhanced by acquiring spectra using a very fast scan rate. For example, in these instrument spectra, scanning takes place at 1.4 kHz, allowing the averaging of 1400 spectra per second for ratio calculation. In addition, laser spectroscopy eliminates the IRMS problem of common mass isotopologues that require assumed abundances to calculate final isotope ratios because the majority of trace gas molecules have unique absorption responses. Laser isotope analysis systems also offer lower cost, lower power consumption, and a benchtop size footprint and do not require high-purity gases or high-vacuum systems. These advantages have led to a number of studies that use laser spectroscopy for field monitoring of stable isotopes of CO2.311 Laser systems, however, remain much less common than IRMS for batch analyses in laboratory settings, with the exception of devices for medical diagnosis, such as H. pylori infection detection via human breath CO2.12 Barker et al. reported the first application of batch analyses using an off-axis integrated cavity output laser spectroscopy instrument to measure δ18O and δ13C of carbonate minerals.13 However, they used very large quantities of CaCO3 (ca. 35 mg) for the analyses, which is impractical for most earth science studies, and the precision of the measurement was not comparable to conventional IRMS.

Here, we report simultaneous 18O/16O, 13C/12C, and 17O/16O analyses for microgram quantities of CaCO3 by tunable infrared laser direct absorption spectroscopy (TILDAS), coupled to a cryogen-free preparation vacuum line (Sakai and Matsuda),15 in a system that provides sensitivity and precision comparable to well established conventional IRMS. Three major innovations are described in this paper: (1) modification of a flow-through TILDAS absorption cell for measurement of low pressure, pure CO2 gas yielding rapid high precision isotope ratio measurements, (2) the development of a cryogen-free carbonate preparation line for CO2 sample introduction under precisely controlled conditions, and (3) direct measurement of 17O/16O ratios in small CO2 samples.

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Tunable Infrared Laser Direct Absorption Spectroscopy.

Spectroscopic measurements were performed with a tunable infrared laser direct absorption spectroscopy (TILDAS; Aerodyne Research Inc.) system, represented by the multipass absorption cell in Figure 1. The instrument used a quantum cascade laser (QCL) tuned to 2310 cm−1 to measure the absorption spectrum of four CO2 isotopologues: 12C16O2,12C17O16O, 12C18O16O, and 13C16O2 (Figure 2). The design of the instrument and characteristics of the absorption lines are described in detail in McManus et al.11 In most other applications, the TILDAS system is used to measure gases and/or isotope ratios in a flow-through gas handling system yielding continuous measurement of gas mixtures (primarily atmosphere samples). In our modified instrument, the absorption cell is miniaturized and vacuum tight, allowing CO2 gas to be introduced into the pre-evacuated cell and isolated at a low pressure for measurement under highly stable and repeatable conditions. This is similar to the system shown for methane isotope measurements by Ono et al.14 In our system, the cell is approximately 200 mL in volume and designed with a 36 m optical path length within the cell. The detector is a thermoelectrically cooled photovoltaic detector. Laser control, data acquisition and real-time signal processing are performed by dedicated software (TDLWintel). The output for each isotopologue is calculated by nonlinear least-squares fitting of its absorption spectrum, yielding a peak area that can be used to find a ratio with other peaks. These peak-area ratios are then calibrated against CO2 derived from standard carbonates with known stable isotope ratios.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic diagram of the measurement system. The system consists of a CaCO3 reaction unit, CO2 purification unit, and tunable infrared laser absorption spectroscopy (TILDAS) system. A cryogen-free CO2 preparation system developed by Sakai and Matsuda was employed. TILDAS is shown as the multipass cell and two valves, enclosed in the orange box.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Example of absorption spectrum for CO2 obtained by the TILDAS system with a 36 m absorption path at 10 Torr (1333 Pa) total cell pressure. The measured spectrum is the green trace, and the fit is the black trace. The fit background is the black dotted line. The quantum cascade laser (QCL) scans the laser frequency range using 800 channels (point number) at a rate of 1.4 kHz as shown in the horizontal axis.

The optical bench is thermally insulated and the temperature of the bench and absorption cell is regulated using air−liquid heat exchangers and cooling liquid supplied by a recirculating chiller. The inside of an optical bench housing is purged with N2 at a constant flow rate of 4.5 standard liters per minute (slpm) to prevent any laser light absorption by ambient CO2 outside of the multipass cell. The careful stabilization of cell temperature and sample pressure allows samples to be measured at high precision and with high repeatability.

Automated Cryogen-Free CO2 Preparation System.

This system prepares CO2 gas from carbonate samples and delivers it to the absorption chamber (Figure 1). The preparation system is divided into two main units: a calcium−carbonate reaction unit and a CO2 gas purification/pressure-adjustment unit.

The carbonate reaction unit consists of a thermoblock (NDM01; Nisshinrika, Ltd.), a phosphoric metering pump (PiP1CTC-LF; Fluid Metering, Inc.), and a needle assembly for carbonate reaction (JASCO International Co., Ltd.). Carbonate samples are loaded into 1.5-mL reaction vials sealed with septum caps (0.8 mm thick PTFE/butyl/PTFE). These vials are then heated to 90°C in the temperature-controlled thermoblock. A double-hole needle is inserted into the reaction vial, and air is pumped out of the vial using the upper needle hole. After pumping the vial to <0.05 Torr (7 Pa), three drops of phosphoric acid (~50 μL) are introduced from the lower hole using the fluid metering pump, which initiates the reaction (CaCO3 + H3PO4 → CaHPO4 + H2O + CO2). Once the acid has been delivered, the fluid pump reverses flow to draw back the acid that remains inside the needle volume. The needle remains in the sample vial until the sample reaction is complete (~10 min).

The CO2 gas purification/pressure-adjustment unit consists of a stainless-steel vacuum-tight purification line with pneumatic diaphragm valves (DP series; Swagelok), a capacitance manometer (722B; MKS Instruments, Inc.), metering valves for N2 purging (SS-2MA; Seagelok), a portable free-piston stirling cooler (FPSC; Product number: SC-UF01; Twinbird Corp.),15 an actuator-driven bellows (14 to 98 mL), and two cells of a fixed volume, all of which are connected to a dry pump (DeoDry 15E; Kashiyama Industries Ltd.). All components are controlled by custom-built software.

The gases generated by the calcium−carbonate reaction (CO2, water, and other trace gases) are transferred from the reaction cell through the upper hole of a double-hole needle and frozen in a cold-trap at −196°C, cooled by the cryogen-free stirling cooling method.15 After pumping any noncondensable gases from the cold trap, the CO2 is released into the line by warming the stirling cooling unit to −115°C.16 At this temperature, water and many other contaminants will remain frozen. Previous studies have reported that water vapor acts as an interfering species for laser spectroscopy, not because of H2O spectral absorption features but because of collisional broadening effects.3,7,13 The amount of CO2 generated is then measured with the manometer and expanded into the bellows. The adjustable volume allows the CO2 gas pressure to be controlled within ±3 × 10−4 Torr (0.04 Pa) precision, and the targeted amount of CO2 gas can then be expanded into the absorption cell of TILDAS for stable isotopic analysis. For the reference gas measurement, small amounts of a pure standard CO2 gas (Oztech isotopic ratio reference CO2 gas) can be introduced to the absorption cell using the same adjustable volume as the sample measurement.

Steps in a Spectroscopic Gas Measurement.

Each measurement is processed as follows. First, the absorption cell is flushed with dry N2 supplied from metering valve-1 or −2 (Figure 1), followed by pumping the cell and lines to 0.0 Torr/Pa using a dry pump. After flushing, a 1 min baseline measurement is taken. Then metered quantities of CO2 by manometer and N2 (valve-2) are introduced to the absorption cell. After a 3 min delay for complete mixing, the CO2 sample sealed in the absorption cell is measured at 1.4 kHz, integrated for 5 min resolution. After measurement, the absorption cell is again flushed with N2 from metering valve-1 or −2 and evacuated.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Because cell pressure and temperature have a significant impact on the stability of ratio measurements, we will first examine the impact each has on the resulting ratio precision. After this, we will describe the instrument stability observed when operated under optimal conditions.

Pressure Effects on Absorption Spectra.

The leak rate of the absorption cell is quite low (0.018 Torr/h; 2.4 Pa/h), which is suitable for batch analyses. Pressure dependence of the absorption spectra was evaluated by adding N2 to a fixed amount of CO2 gas (Oztech CO2 gas; 0.4 Torr) in the multipass cell (Figure 3a,b). Stability of the absorption peaks seems to be enhanced by the addition of N2 to the CO2 in the absorption cell, perhaps due to pressure broadening. We can see that the ratios of absorption peaks, R18O (12C18O16O/12C16O2), R13C (13C16O2/12C16O), and R17 O (12C17O16O/12C16O2), show linear relationships with total cell pressure change, which suggests that ratio measurement is most accurate at a single pressure condition (Figure 3a). This also suggests that the isotopic ratio can be calibrated to different pressures by using the observed linear relationships. The impact of leak rate of the absorption cell (0.018 Torr/h; 2.4 Pa/h) on sample precision for R18O, R13C, and R17O is negligible, being only 0.002 ‰, 0.011 ‰, and 0.035 ‰ per hour, respectively. Figure 3b shows that across a range of cell pressures the standard error for a 5 min measurement of R18O and R13C is better than 0.06 ‰. This is true from 0.1 to 50 Torr (13 to 6666 Pa). Note that the standard error of R13C is better than 0.03 ‰ at all pressures over 10.0 Torr (1333 Pa; Figure 3b). The standard error of R17O shows a minimum at cell pressures of 10 to 15 Torr (1333 to 2000 Pa). As a result, we conclude that a total pressure range of 10 to 15 Torr (1333 to 2000 Pa) is an optimal choice for high-precision data for all three ratios.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Pressure dependence of absorption spectrum of CO2 isotopologues. (a) Each isotopic ratio is strongly correlated with cell pressure change. R2 of the equations shows coefficient of determination. (b) Standard errors of R18O and R13C for a 5 min measurement are better than 0.06 ‰ (1 S.E.) at 10−50 Torr (1333− 6666 Pa) total cell pressure. Standard error of R17O shows a minimum at 10 to 15 Torr (1333−1999 Pa) cell pressure. Overall 10 to 15 Torr is an optimum cell pressure for measurement.

Temperature Effects on Absorption Spectra.

The optical bench of the TILDAS instrument is thermally insulated, and temperature is regulated using air−liquid heat exchangers and cooling water supplied by a recirculating chiller. This system maintains the temperature stability of the multipass cell within ±0.02 K.14 The temperature dependence of the absorption response and the isotopic ratios were evaluated by changing the target temperature setting of the recirculating chiller while repeatedly measuring one CO2 gas sample (Oztech CO2 gas). The temperature dependence of the results was isolated by subtracting the effect of pressure differences during the test using the pressure dependence of the isotopic ratios (Figure 3a). The results show a broadly similar linear relationship with cell temperature (Figure 4a). The resulting isotopic ratios calculated from the concentrations of each isotopologue are approximately uniform, although there are slight slope differences from a simple linear relationship in each isotopologues’ peak area and resulting isotope ratios (Figure 4a,b). The TILDAS instrument can generally keep the cell temperature stable to better than 0.006 ± 0.042 K (5 min measurement; n = 20), which would reflect a precision of R18O,R13C, and R17O better than 0.04 ‰, 0.02 ‰, and 0.11 ‰, respectively, before any temperature correction is applied.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Temperature dependence of the absorption spectrum of CO2 isotopologues. (a) All isotopologues show broadly similar linear relationships with cell temperature. (b) Peak area ratios change slightly with temperature change due to the subtle slope differences in the mostly linear response of each isotopologue. R2 of the equations shows coefficient of determination.

CO2 Concentration Effects on Absorption Spectra.

The isotopic ratios observed by spectroscopy are dependent on CO2 concentration since instrumental linearity may cause changes in the peak-area ratios with concentration.6,8,13 Our study also confirmed that R18O, R13C, and R17O show a dependence on the amount of CO2 (Oztech CO2 gas) in the cell when the CO2 pressure in the cell is below approximately 0.45 Torr (Figure 5a). This suggests that, in this system, the optimum amount for calcium carbonate measurement is between 28 and 100 μg of CaCO3. Above the 100 μg level, the primary CO2 absorption peak is saturated. The standard errors of R18O and R13C are better than ±0.08 ‰ (Figure 5b) across a range of CO2 concentrations that corresponds to 3−94 μg of CaCO3. This shows that our system can achieve high-precision R18O and R13C analyses with microgram quantities of CaCO3. In contrast, the standard error of R17O is much larger than those of R18O and R13C at lower CO2 amounts. This is because the amplitude of the 12C17O16O absorption peak is much smaller than those of the 12C16O2, 12C18O16O, and 13C16O2 absorption spectra11 (Figure 2). This leads to a narrower concentration window for accurate measurement of R17O, where the standard error of R17O in larger samples, greater than approximately 50 μg of CaCO3, shows comparable precision with R18O and R13C (Figure 5b).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Plots of isotopic ratios and standard error with CO2 concentrations. All plots are produced using a 5 min measurement at 10.0 Torr total cell pressure. (a) Isotopic ratios show CO2 concentration dependency below 0.45 Torr CO2. (b) Standard errors of R18O and R13C are all better than 0.08 ‰ (1 S.E.) across the entire range tested, CaCO3 equivalents from 2 μg to 94 μg. The standard errors of R17O measurement when CO2 pressure is above 0.8 Torr (50 μg of CaCO3) are comparable with R18O and R13C. Top and bottom x axes are equivalent.

Instrument Stability under Optimal Conditions.

Instrument stability over the short term was evaluated using the Allan variance technique.17 The ratios of individual CO2 isotopologues were measured with one second resolution over 1 h using 0.6 μmol of CO2 (Oztech CO2 gas; equivalent to 60 μg of CaCO3) combined with 10.0 Torr (1333 Pa) of pure N2 (Figure 6). The optimum averaging time is between 160 and 330 s, which corresponds to a relative precision of 0.039 ‰ (300 s), 0.085 ‰ (240 s), and 0.173 ‰ (300 s) for R18O,R13C, and R17O, respectively. However, system drift begins to confound the calculated ratio average beyond 330 s; this suggests that 5 min (300 s) or less is the best interval for each measurement sequence.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Allan variance plots for R18O, R13C, and R17O of 1.0 Torr CO2 (equivalent to 60 μg of CaCO3) measured by TILDAS. Measurement was performed under the absorption cell total pressure of 10.0 Torr for 1 h. Shaded area shows the optimal averaging time (horizontal level) for one measurement sequence.

Conversion of R13C and R18O to Conventional δ13C and δ18O Values.

The peak areas of individual isotopologues are correlated with the concentration of each isotopologue in the cell, and ratios of the absorption peaks (R13C, R18O, and R17O) will vary in systematic ways in response to isotope ratio differences in the CO2 gas. We therefore use a simple correlation between accepted isotope ratios and the ratios measured by the TILDAS system. To convert R13C and R18O to conventional δ13CPDB and δ18 OPDB values, a two-point calibration derived from two standards, JNOC-86 and LSVEC, with very different isotope ratios was measured by TILDAS, while treating the two additional standards (JNOC-127 and Baker calcite) as external standards (Table 1; Figure 7). These measurements all used CO2 gas derived from 60 μg of CaCO3 under 10.0 Torr (1333 Pa) total cell pressure measurement conditions. This test produced a highly linear relationship between the accepted δ13CPDB and δ18OPDB values of standards and R13C and R18O measured by TILDAS (Figure 7a,b). The linear calibrations are as follows:

δ18OPDB=1070.7×R18 1055.8 (R2= 0.99)
δ18CPDB=1014.5×R13 1018.2 (R2= 0.99)

The R13C and R18O measured by TILDAS of the two external standards, JNOC-127 and Baker calcite, coincided well with the accepted δ13CPDB and δ18OPDB values, implying a good linearity of response. The differences between IRMS and TILDAS data are better than 0.28 ‰ for δ13CPDB and 0.27 ‰ for δ18OPDB (Table 1).

Table 1.

R18O (12C18O16O/12C16O2), R13C (13C16O2/12C16O2), and R17O (12C17O16O/12C16O2) from the TILDAS Systema

R18O ± 1 R13C ± 1 R17O ± 1 cell pressure cell temperature calculated calculated
standard n R18O S.E. R13C S.E. R17O S.E. (Torr) (K) δ18OVPDB δ13CVPDB
JNOC-86 6 0.9866 0.00006 1.0062 0.00013 1.0131 0.00107 10.04 297.62 0.521 2.617
JNOC-127 5 0.9816 0.00013 0.9976 0.00029 1.0076 0.00034 10.07 297.64 −4.767 −5.924
Baker calcite 4 0.9712 0.00012 0.9625 0.00021 1.0021 0.00010 10.06 297.63 −15.92 −41.70
LSVEC 6 0.9611 0.00012 0.9577 0.00012 0.9990 0.00041 10.06 297.63 −26.7 −41.70
a

Cell pressure (Torr), cell temperature (K), and calculated isotopic values obtained from the TILDAS system are also shown. Accepted δ values are reported by IRMS. R18O, R13C, and R17O are normalized at 10.0 Torr (1333 Pa) in total pressure and 297.65 K (24.5°C) conditions based on the equations of Figures 3a and 4b.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Accepted δ18O and δ13C by IRMS values plotted against R18O and R13C by TILDAS.

To assess measurement repeatability, a subdivided standard CO2 gas (Oztech gas; Figure 1) was measured 10 times with a 5 min measurement time at 10.0 Torr (1333 Pa) total cell pressure. The repeatability results of five different CO2 concentrations are shown in Table 2. The standard errors of R18O and R13C above 0.16 Torr CO2 were better than 0.1 ‰, which is comparable to conventional IRMS under small-sample batch-analysis conditions.18

Table 2.

Repeatability Test for R18O (12C18O16O/12C16O2), R13C (13C16O2/12C16O2), and R17O (12C17O16O/12 C16O2) with Different CO2 Concentrations that Correspond to between 2 μg of CaCO3 and 100 μg of CaCO3a

calculated CaCO3 R18 ± 1 S.E. R13 ± 1 S.E. R17 ± 1 S.E. cell pressure cell temperature
standard n volume (μg) R18 (‰) R13 (‰) R17 (‰) (Torr) (K)
Oztech-1.46 Torr 10 90 0.9877 0.058 0.9984 0.099 1.0109 0.129 10.07 297.58
Oztech-1.09 Torr 10 67 0.9861 0.067 0.9984 0.129 1.0101 0.069 10.06 297.57
Oztech-0.65 Torr 10 40 0.9865 0.067 1.0033 0.105 1.0010 0.248 10.06 297.60
Oztech-0.16 Torr 10 10 0.9910 0.094 1.0385 0.108 0.9239 0.477 10.06 297.59
Oztech-0.03 Torr 10 2 0.9975 0.136 1.0725 0.387 0.8102 2.006 10.07 297.60
a

CO2 concentrations are represented by major isotopologue (12C16O2) concentration. Cell pressure (Torr) and cell temperature (K) are also shown. R18O, R13C, and R17O are normalized at 10.0 Torr (1333 Pa) in total pressure and 297.65 K (24.5°C) conditions based on the equations of Figures 3a and 4b.

δ13C and δ18O Microanalysis of CaCO3.

For high-spatial and temporal resolution studies of carbonates, δ13C and δ18O analyses with microgram quantities of carbonates are required. Some examples of research requiring extremely small samples include growth band analysis of small fish otoliths, shell, corals, and microfossil studies of foraminifers and ostracods. Ishimura et al. reported δ13C and δ18O measurements of samples as small as 0.2 μg of CaCO3 with standard deviations of 0.1 ‰ for δ13C and 0.18 ‰ for δ18O in a study of individual foraminifers using a customized continuous-flow IRMS.16 Routine measurement of 6 μg of CaCO3 by conventional IRMS has been reported,18 with standard deviations of 0.05 ‰ for δ13C and 0.1 ‰ for δ18O. As shown in Figure 5, our instrument is capable of measuring isotope ratios for CO2 amounts equivalent to 2 μg of CaCO3 with standard errors of 0.08 ‰ for δ13C and 0.07 ‰ for δ18O. The repeatability test for samples of this size produced standard errors of 0.387 ‰ for δ13C and 0.135 ‰ for δ18O (Table 2). To achieve the highest accuracy in a ratio measurement, samples are compared with a reference CO2 gas, for which the effect of concentration dependency is removed by carefully adjusting the reference CO2 to match the sample gas cell concentration using the high-precision bellows system (Figure 1). The TILDAS system, with cryogen-free sample preparation vacuum-lines for microgram quantities of carbonates, is therefore a significant advance in carbonate stable isotope ratio geochemistry and is useful as an alternative to conventional IRMS.

17O/16O of CaCO3.

The study of 17O in carbonates is not widespread, mainly due to the difficulty of the measurement. The 17O/16O ratio in meteorites has been studied with large anomalies in 17O content relative to terrestrial materials.19 In recent years, δ17O and 17O-excess measurements in carbonates have been recognized as useful data in paleo-environmental studies, especially terrestrial studies where the effect of evaporation is important.2 High-precision measurement of 17O/16O using IRMS is difficult, because the 12C17O16O isotopologue (~760 ppm) is masked by the much more abundant 13C16O2 isotopologue (~11 000 ppm) of the same nominal mass. Measurement, therefore, required a complicated preparation processes, involving quantitative (for oxygen) conversion of CO2 to O2 or conversion of CO2 to H2O, which has no native interfering isobars, by an acid digestion/reduction/fluorination approach.2,20 Kawaguchi et al. measured δ17O by continuous-flow IRMS using two different CO2 streams. One aliquot flows into the IRMS directly, while the other aliquot flows through a CuO unit (900°C) prior to injection into IRMS, to exchange oxygen atoms in the sample CO2 molecules with those of CuO whose 17O anomaly is assumed to be zero.21 Our TILDAS system is the first example of direct measurement of 17O/16O ratios in CO2 gas. This CO2 is generated from carbonate through a conventional acid digestion method using our automated CO2 purification system. Analytical precision of 17O/16O of CO2 derived from 68 μg of CaCO3 at 10.0 Torr (1333 Pa) total cell pressure is better than 0.03 ‰ (±0.069 ‰ repeatability; n = 10, Figure 5). Figure 8 and Table 3 show the relationship between 17O/16O by the TILDAS method and the δ17O of international standard materials (NBS-19 and NBS-18) by IRMS.22 Our laser spectroscopic system with cryogen-free sample preparation vacuum lines thus can become a powerful tool for 17O/16O analyses of carbonates.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

δ17O by IRMS values plotted against R17O by TILDAS. International standard materials (NBS-18 and −19) are used for tie points in this relationship. Values for the other carbonates are extrapolated from our R17O measurements with the TILDAS system.

Table 3.

R17O (12C17O16O/12C16O2) by TILDASa

R17O ± 1 calculated δ17OVSMOW
standard n R17O S.E. δ17OVSMOW Barkan et al.
NBS-18 3 0.9984 0.00020 9.253
NBS-19 3 1.0083 0.00005 20.257
JNOC-86 6 1.0131 0.00107 25.787
JNOC-127 5 1.0076 0.00034 19.612
Baker calcite 4 1.0021 0.00010 13.475
LSVEC 6 0.9990 0.00041 9.970
a

Accepted δ values of NBS-18 and NBS-19 are reported by IRMS. δ17O values of the other four samples were calculated with the two point calibration equation of NBS-18 and NBS-19. R17O is normalized at 10.0 Torr (1333 Pa) in total pressure and at 297.65 K (24.5°C) conditions based on the equations of Figures 3a and 4b.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated the simultaneous 18O/16O, 13C/12C, and 17O/16O measurement of microgram quantities of CaCO3 by tunable infrared laser direct absorption spectroscopy (TILDAS), coupled to a cryogen-free preparation vacuum line, in a system that provides sensitivity and precision comparable to well established conventional IRMS. We also showed the first example of high-precision direct measurement of 17O/16O ratios in CO2 gas and a small amount of carbonates (below 70 μg of CaCO3) with a conventional acid digestion method. Additional work on the sample preparation system design could reduce the inlet-line dead volume even further, which would reduce the amount of CO2 or CaCO3 required for a measurement. The TILDAS system, coupled to a cryogen-free preparation vacuum line for microgram quantities of carbonates, is therefore a significant advance in carbonate stable isotope ratio geochemistry, and may be additionally expanded into high-precision rare isotopologue measurements, such as carbonateclumped isotopes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge Asahiko Taira (JAMSTEC), Masahiro Kawasaki (RIHN), Yutaka Matsumi (Nagoya University), Akihiro Kano (University of Tokyo), Hitoshi Yanagida (Sanyu Plant Service Co. Ltd.), and Haruhisa Yano (Address Service Co. Ltd.) for their support in establishing this system. Partial funding of this work was provided by grants-inaid for scientific research by MEXT/JSPS (No. 23681006 and 15H03756 and 15KK0179) to S.S.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Zachos J; Pagani M; Sloan L; Thomas E; Billups K Science 2001, 292, 686–693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Passey BH; Hu H; Ji H; Montanari S; Li S; Henkes GA; Levin NE Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2014, 141, 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Bowling DR; Sargent NW; Tanner BD; Ehleringer JR Agric. For. Meteorol 2003, 118, 1. [Google Scholar]
  • (4).McManus JB; Nelson DD; Shorter JH; Jimenez R; Herndon S; Saleska S; Zahniser MJ Mod. Opt 2005, 52, 2309–2321. [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Mohn J; Werner RA; Buchmann B; Emmenegger LJ Mol. Struct 2007, 834–836, 95. [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Tuzson B; Mohn J; Zeeman MJ; Werner RA; Eugster W; Zahniser MS; Nelson DD; McManus JB; Emmenegger L Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt 2008, 92, 451–458. [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Tuzson B; Zeeman MJ; Zahniser MS; Emmenegger L Infrared Phys. Technol 2008, 51, 198–206. [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Nelson DD; McManus JB; Herndon SC; Tuzson B; Emmenegger L; Zahniser MS Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt 2008, 90, 301–309. [Google Scholar]
  • (9).McManus JB; Nelson DD; Zahniser MS Isot. Environ. Health Stud 2010, 46, 49–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).van Geldern R; Nowak ME; Zimmer M; Szizybalski A; Myrttinen A; Barth JAC; Jost HJ Anal. Chem 2014, 86, 12191–12198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).McManus JB; Nelson DD; Zahniser MS Opt. Express 2015, 23, 6569–6586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Maity A; Banik GD; Ghosh C; Som S; Chaudhuri S; Daschakraborty SB; Ghosh S; Ghosh B; Raychaudhuri AK; Pradhan MJ Breath Res. 2014, 8, 016005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Barker SL; Dipple GM; Dong F; Baer DD Anal. Chem 2011, 83, 2220–2226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Ono S; Wang DT; Gruen DS; Sherwood Loller B; Zahniser MS; McManus BJ; Nelson D Anal. Chem 2014, 86, 6487–6494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Sakai S; Matsuda S Anal. Chem 2017, 89, 4409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Ishimura T; Tsunogai U; Gamo T Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom 2004, 18, 2883–2888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Werle P; Mucke R; Slemr E Appl. Phys. B: Photophys. Laser Chem 1993, 57, 131. [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Application Note: 30176, Thermo Scientific.
  • (19).Clayton RN; Mayeda TK Earth Planet. Sci. Lett 1984, 67, 151–161. [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Barkan E; Luz B Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom 2012, 26, 2733–2738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Kawagucci S; Tsunogai U; Kudo S; Nakagawa F; Honda H; Aoki S; Nakazawa T; Gamo T Anal. Chem 2005, 77, 4509–4514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Barkan E; Musan I; Luz B Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom 2015, 29, 2219–2224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES