Data set for diffusion coefficients and relative creep rate ratios of 26 dilute Ni-X alloy systems from first-principles calculations

Chelsey Z Hargather; Shun-Li Shang; Zi-Kui Liu

doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.08.144

. 2018 Aug 31;20:1537–1551. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.08.144

Data set for diffusion coefficients and relative creep rate ratios of 26 dilute Ni-X alloy systems from first-principles calculations

Chelsey Z Hargather ^a,^b,^⁎, Shun-Li Shang ^a, Zi-Kui Liu ^a

PMCID: PMC6153149 PMID: 30258957

Abstract

The development of future generations of Ni-base superalloys will depend on a systematic understanding of how each alloying element affects the fundamental properties of Ni-base superalloys, particularly with respect to their creep behavior. First, this article presents the temperature-dependent data of all factors entering into dilute impurity diffusion for 26 Ni-X alloy systems, including atomic jump frequencies, thermodynamic parameters, and diffusivity plots. Second, this article presents the data used to calculate the relative creep rate ratios showing the effect of each of the 26 alloying elements, X, on the dilute Ni-X alloy. The dataset refers to “A comprehensive first-principles study of solute elements in dilute Ni alloys: Diffusion coefficients and their implications to tailor creep rate” by Hargather et al. [1].

Specifications table

Subject area	Materials Science
More specific subject area	Ni-base superalloys
Type of data	Tables, figures
How data was acquired	Density functional theory calculations using
	Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP)
Data format	Analyzed
Experimental factors	Not applicable
Experimental features	Not applicable
Data source location	State College, PA, USA
Data accessibility	All data is available in this article

Open in a new tab

Value of the data

•
Future Ni alloys or Ni-base superalloys can be designed using the diffusion coefficient and relative creep rate ratio data from this systematic study for 26 Ni-X alloy systems.
•
A less-computationally expensive but accurate method for calculating all factors entering into dilute solute diffusion as a function of temperature is demonstrated.
•
The diffusion coefficient data could be useful for future development or validation of CALPHAD-style diffusion mobility databases.

1. Computational methodology

Dilute solute diffusion coefficients as a function of temperature were calculated in the present work using density functional theory within the confines of the 5-frequency model [2], [3]. 26 solute atoms were studied in the present work: Al, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hf, Ir, Mn, Mo, Nb, Os, Pd, Pt, Re, Rh, Ru, Sc, Si, Ta, Tc, Ti, V, W, Y, Zn, and Zr.

Total energy calculations are carried out for a 32-atom supercell using the plane wave density functional code, Vienna ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP) [4]. A constant plane wave energy cutoff of 350 eV is used for all calculations, which is 1.3 times the default plane wave energy cutoff of nickel and larger than plane wave energy cutoff of all other solute atoms considered. A Monkhorst-Pack k-mesh scheme is used for all calculations, with a sampling of 8 × 8 × 8 for each system studied. For relaxation during the VASP calculations, the Methfessel-Paxton smearing method [5] is used for the calculation of forces acting on the atoms, and a final static calculation is performed after each relaxation using the linear tetrahedron method with Blöchl׳s [6] correction for an accurate total energy calculation. Total electronic energy is converged to be at least $10^{- 5}$ eV/atom. Due to the ferromagnetism of nickel up until its Curie point, [7], all calculations are performed in the present work within the spin polarized approximation. Further details of diffusion and computational theory can be found in the main article by Hargather et al. [1].

2. Data

2.1. 0 K results

Fig. 1 shows the effect of having one solute atom and no vacancies present in the 32-atom Ni supercell at 0 K on the following properties: equilibrium volume $V_{0}$ , bulk modulus, $B_{0}$ , first derivative of bulk modulus with respect to pressure, ${B'}_{0}$ , and spin magnetic moment, $MM$ . These results are shown without the effect of zero point vibrational energy.

2.2. Atomic jump frequencies and thermodynamic parameters for all $26 {Ni}_{31}$ X systems

The data in this section presents all factors relating to dilute solute diffusion as a function of temperature for all $26 {Ni}_{31}$ X systems studied in the present work. Data is presented at T=700 K and T=1700 K. A detailed explanation of each of the jump frequencies and importance of the thermodynamic parameters can be found in the main article by Hargather et al. [1]. Table 1 gives the Gibbs energy of migration for each jump in the 5-frequency model for each of the 26 solutes in a Ni host lattice at the designated temperatures.

Table 1.

Gibbs energy of migration, $Δ G_{m}$ for each of the five jump frequencies for dilute solute diffusion of all $26 {Ni}_{31}$ X systems studied in the present work.

Solute	Temp, (K)	$Δ G_{m 0}$ (eV)	$Δ G_{m 1}$ (eV)	$Δ G_{m 2}$ (eV)	$Δ G_{m 3}$ (eV)	$Δ G_{m 4}$ (eV)
Al	T=700 K	1.12	1.36	0.79	1.29	1.11
	T=1700 K	1.07	1.43	0.86	1.34	1.19

Co	T=700	1.12	1.24	1.38	1.23	1.27
	T=1700	1.07	1.27	1.41	1.27	1.32

Cr	T=700	1.12	1.18	1.30	1.20	1.27
	T=1700	1.07	1.25	1.20	1.19	1.32

Cu	T=700 K	1.12	1.27	0.98	1.25	1.17
	T=1700 K	1.07	1.34	1.04	1.31	1.24

Fe	T=700	1.12	1.29	1.20	1.23	1.25
	T=1700	1.07	1.33	1.26	1.27	1.32

Hf	T=700	1.12	1.73	0.40	1.36	0.79
	T=1700	1.07	1.75	0.51	1.40	0.92

Ir	T=700	1.12	1.41	1.72	1.07	1.17
	T=1700	1.07	1.46	1.77	1.14	1.25

Mn	T=700	1.12	1.24	0.95	1.35	1.27
	T=1700	1.07	2.02	1.72	2.23	1.45

Mo	T=700	1.12	1.44	1.31	1.15	1.07
	T=1700	1.07	1.48	1.37	1.20	1.18

Nb	T=700	1.12	1.58	0.76	1.24	0.92
	T=1700	1.07	1.60	0.85	1.27	1.03

Os	T=700	1.12	1.38	1.89	1.06	1.21
	T=1700	1.07	1.42	1.95	1.14	1.32

Pd	T=700	1.12	1.44	1.11	1.19	1.04
	T=1700	1.07	1.49	1.18	1.25	1.13

Pt	T=700	1.12	1.43	1.37	1.13	1.07
	T=1700	1.07	1.47	1.42	1.18	1.15

Re	T=700	1.12	1.38	1.89	1.09	1.18
	T=1700	1.07	1.44	1.97	1.16	1.31

Rh	T=700	1.12	1.41	1.40	1.13	1.14
	T=1700	1.07	1.44	1.43	1.18	1.21

Ru	T=700	1.12	1.39	1.51	1.09	1.16
	T=1700	1.07	1.42	1.53	1.15	1.24

Sc	T=700	1.12	−0.65	0.81	1.12	0.78
	T=1700	1.07	0.15	1.65	1.89	1.93

Si	T=700 K	1.12	1.12	0.95	1.34	1.22
	T=1700 K	1.07	1.16	0.99	1.28	1.37

Ta	T=700	1.12	1.56	0.92	1.21	0.95
	T=1700	1.07	1.59	1.02	1.24	1.06

Tc	T=700	1.12	1.38	1.57	1.10	1.16
	T=1700	1.07	1.42	1.63	1.15	1.25

Ti	T=700	1.12	1.43	0.61	1.28	1.02
	T=1700	1.07	1.46	0.69	1.31	1.11

V	T=700	1.12	1.26	1.09	1.22	1.17
	T=1700	1.07	1.29	1.15	1.24	1.25

W	T=700	1.12	1.45	1.50	1.13	1.09
	T=1700	1.07	1.51	1.60	1.20	1.22

Y	T=700	1.12	2.42	0.25	0.26	−1.28
	T=1700	1.07	2.45	0.40	0.41	−0.79

Zn	T=700	1.12	1.34	0.80	1.31	1.11
	T=1700	1.07	1.41	0.89	1.38	1.18

Zr	T=700	1.12	1.82	0.27	0.14	−0.66
	T=1700	1.07	1.80	0.35	0.20	−0.60

Open in a new tab

Table 2 presents all of the thermodynamic factors entering into dilute solute diffusion for all $26 {Ni}_{31}$ X systems studied in the present work. The thermodynamic factors include the correlation factor, $f_{2}$ , the enthalpy of vacancy formation adjacent to the solute, $Δ H_{f}$ , the enthalpy of migration of the solute atom moving into an adjacent vacancy, $Δ H_{m}$ , the entropy of vacancy formation adjacent to a solute, $Δ S_{f}$ , entropy of migration of the solute atom, $Δ S_{m}$ , and the temperature dependence of the correlation factor, C.

Table 2.

Thermodynamic parameters at 700 K and 1700 K given for all factors entering into vacancy mediated dilute solute diffusion for the $26 {Ni}_{31}$ X systems studied in the present work. Calculated values include the correlation factor, $f_{2}$ , the enthalpy of vacancy formation adjacent to the solute, $Δ H_{f}$ , the enthalpy of migration of the solute atom moving into an adjacent vacancy, $Δ H_{m}$ , the entropy of vacancy formation adjacent to a solute, $Δ S_{f}$ , entropy of migration of the solute atom, $Δ S_{m}$ , and the temperature dependence of $f_{2}$ , C.

Solute	Temp, (K)	$f_{2}$	$Δ H_{f}$ (eV)	$Δ H_{m}$ (eV)	$Δ S_{f}$ ( $k_{B}$ )	$Δ S_{m}$ ( $k_{B}$ )	C (eV)
Al	T=700 K	0.0006	1.62	0.75	2.13	−0.607	0.532
	T=1700 K	0.104	1.69	0.70	2.84	−1.11	0.482

Co	T=700	0.973	1.70	1.37	1.95	−0.17	−0.004
	T=1700	0.896	1.76	1.33	2.55	−0.60	−0.016

Cr	T=700 K	0.951	1.71	1.36	1.72	0.97	−0.009
	T=1700 K	0.755	1.76	1.41	2.20	1.41	−0.056

Cu	T=700	0.030	1.62	0.96	2.17	−0.38	0.273
	T=1700	0.340	1.69	0.88	2.92	−1.12	0.181
Fe	T=700	0.614	1.71	1.18	1.97	−0.35	0.020
	T=1700	0.725	1.79	1.12	2.69	−0.91	0.014

Hf	T=700	0.000	1.35	0.34	1.80	−0.98	1.022
	T=1700	0.005	1.43	0.27	2.54	−1.60	1.172

Ir	T=700	1.000	1.66	1.69	1.90	−0.38	0.000
	T=1700	0.995	1.72	1.64	2.50	−0.93	−0.003

Mn	T=700	0.010	1.87	0.60	7.35	−5.87	0.345
	T=1700	0.159	3.02	−0.10	18.21	−12.44	0.125

Mo	T=700	0.970	1.65	1.27	1.75	−0.52	−0.004
	T=1700	0.898	1.70	1.22	2.19	−1.04	−0.015

Nb	T=700	0.000	1.52	0.71	1.80	−0.76	0.554
	T=1700	0.123	1.58	0.66	2.40	−1.28	0.495

Os	T=700	1.000	1.70	1.87	1.80	−0.44	0.000
	T=1700	0.998	1.77	1.81	2.50	−1.00	−0.001

Pd	T=700	0.366	1.57	1.09	2.17	−0.41	0.079
	T=1700	0.619	1.66	1.02	3.02	−1.03	0.031

Pt	T=700	0.993	1.58	1.36	2.06	−0.26	−0.002
	T=1700	0.931	1.66	1.31	2.80	−0.76	−0.018

Re	T=700	1.000	1.71	1.86	1.51	−0.51	0.000
	T=1700	0.998	1.76	1.79	1.95	−1.21	−0.001

Rh	T=700	0.996	1.64	1.40	1.99	−0.16	−0.001
	T=1700	0.935	1.68	1.37	2.39	−0.43	−0.020

Ru	T=700	1.000	1.73	1.44	2.81	−1.06	0.000
	T=1700	0.973	1.98	1.25	4.17	−1.96	−0.013

Sc	T=700 K	1.0000	1.31	0.36	8.97	−7.34	0.000
	T=1700 K	1.0000	1.85	−0.18	14.09	−12.51	0.000

Si	T=700 K	0.06	1.57	0.95	1.91	−0.16	0.169
	T=1700 K	0.32	1.63	0.90	2.57	−0.61	0.162

Ta	T=700	0.010	1.58	0.86	1.72	−0.91	0.383
	T=1700	0.366	1.63	0.80	2.19	−1.51	0.234

Tc	T=700	1.000	1.69	1.55	1.80	−0.35	0.000
	T=1700	0.985	1.75	1.49	2.39	−0.94	−0.007
Ti	T=700 K	0.0000	1.60	0.57	1.94	−0.70	0.760
	T=1700 K	0.0410	1.68	0.50	2.68	−1.32	0.689

V	T=700 K	0.2771	1.60	1.06	1.84	−0.47	0.108
	T=1700 K	0.6244	1.75	1.01	2.35	−1.00	0.058

W	T=700	0.999	1.68	1.45	1.68	−0.84	0.000
	T=1700	0.975	1.72	1.38	2.07	−1.50	−0.009

Y	T=700	0.489	0.42	0.17	1.19	−1.41	0.001
	T=1700	0.495	0.48	0.10	1.71	−2.05	0.001

Zn	T=700	0.001	1.59	0.76	2.23	−0.65	0.533
	T=1700	0.099	1.69	0.68	3.18	−1.42	0.469

Zr	T=700	0.884	1.19	0.21	1.42	−0.83	−0.013
	T=1700	0.724	1.22	0.18	1.66	−1.08	−0.029

Open in a new tab

2.3. Dilute solute diffusivity plots

Additional plots of diffusivity as a function of 1000/T for the solute systems that were not presented in the main article [1] and have known experimental data are presented in this section. It should be noted that all of the plots are produced from data calculated directly from first-principles, and do not represent Arrhenius fits of data. The following plots in Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10, Fig. 11, Fig. 12, Fig. 13, Fig. 14, Fig. 15 are shown for 2nd row solute elements: Si, for 3d transition row solute elements: Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, and Co, for 4d transition row solute elements: Zr and Mo, and for 5d transition row solute elements: Hf, Ta, W, Re, and Pt. The corresponding plots for the following solutes are shown in the main article [1]: Al, Cu, Nb, and W.

Fig. 2 — Solute diffusion coefficient Si in Ni calculated in the present work (solid line) compared to poly-crystal data of Allison et al. [8] and Swalin et al. [9].

Fig. 3 — Solute diffusion coefficient Ti in Ni calculated in the present work (solid line) compared to poly-crystal data of Bergner [10] and Swalin et al. [11].

Fig. 4 — Solute diffusion coefficient V in Ni calculated in the present work (solid line) compared to poly-crystal data of Murarka et al. [12].

Fig. 5 — Solute diffusion coefficient Cr in Ni calculated in the present work (solid line) compared to poly-crystal data of Monma et al. [13]. Růžičková et al. [14], Tutunnik et al. [15], and Glinchuk et al. [16].

Fig. 6 — Solute diffusion coefficient Mn in Ni calculated in the present work (solid line) compared to poly-crystal data of Swalin et al. [11].

Fig. 7 — Solute diffusion coefficient Fe in Ni calculated in the present work (solid line) compared to single-crystal data of Bakker et al. [17], and to poly-crystal data of Guiarldenq [18] and Badia et al. [19].

Fig. 8 — Solute diffusion coefficient Co in Ni calculated in the present work (solid line) compared to single-crystal data of Vladimirov et al. [20] and to poly-crystal data of Badia et al. [19], Hirano et al. [21], Hassner et al. [22]. Divya et al. [23], and McCoy et al. [24].

Fig. 9 — Solute diffusion coefficient Zr in Ni calculated in the present work (solid line) compared to poly-crystal data of Allison et al. [8] and Bergner [10].

Fig. 10 — Solute diffusion coefficient Mo in Ni calculated in the present work (solid line) compared to poly-crystal data of Swalin et al. [9].

Fig. 11 — Solute diffusion coefficient Hf in Ni calculated in the present work (solid line) compared to the poly-crystal data of Bergner [10].

Fig. 12 — Solute diffusion coefficient Ta in Ni calculated in the present work (solid line) compared to the poly-crystal data of Bergner [10].

Fig. 13 — Solute diffusion coefficient W in Ni calculated in the present work (solid line) compared to the single-crystal data of Vladimirov et al. [20], and the poly-crystal data of Bergner [10], Swalin et al. [11], and Monma [25].

Fig. 14 — Solute diffusion coefficient Re in Ni calculated in the present work (solid line) compared to poly-crystalline diffusion couple experimental data by [26].

Fig. 15 — Solute diffusion coefficient Pt in Ni calculated in the present work (solid line) compared to poly-crystalline diffusion couple experimental data by [27].

2.4. Relative creep rate ratio data table

The diffusivity data from the present work is combined with the elastic constant calculations from Shang et al. [28] and the stacking fault energy calculations from Shang et al. [29] on the same $26 {Ni}_{31}$ X systems to calculate a relative creep rate ratio. The relative creep rate ratio shows the effect of each solute element on the creep rate of the dilute Ni-X alloy compared to the creep rate of pure Ni. The data used for the relative creep rate ratio plots in the main article [1] is presented in Table 3.

Table 3.

Elastic [28] and stacking fault energy [29] data used for calculation of the relative creep rate ratio in the main article [1].

Temp, (K)	Solute	D, $m^{2}$ /sec	b, $Å$	G, GPa	$γ_{SFE}$ , $mJ / m^{2}$	E, GPa
300 K	Al	3.08E-54	1.447	86.31	109.15	223.38
	Co	1.14E-57	1.444	92.26	113.56	237.34
	Cr	3.50E-57	1.445	89.91	100.11	232.05
	Cu	1.88E-53	1.446	87.56	115.12	226.21
	Fe	3.07E-55	1.445	90.52	109.86	232.99
	Hf	1.39E-51	1.456	81.67	68.87	212.19
	Ir	1.58E-62	1.451	88.65	102.77	229.09
	Mn	1.77E-52	1.447	88.43	110.86	228.01
	Mo	1.95E-55	1.450	85.52	62.08	223.23
	Nb	2.77E-52	1.453	82.80	64.31	215.79
	Ni	2.31E-53	1.444	92.22	128.20	236.66
	Os	4.25E-66	1.450	91.74	86.31	236.58
	Pd	4.57E-52	1.451	87.98	118.12	226.82
	Pt	2.07E-55	1.452	88.96	121.06	229.68
	Re	1.90E-66	1.449	88.00	66.57	228.02
	Rh	5.49E-57	1.450	86.10	107.33	223.08
	Ru	2.53E-59	1.449	91.78	91.12	236.18
	Sc	2.88E-34	1.454	82.39	74.82	213.94
	Si	4.62E-51	1.444	85.79	112.50	222.85
	Ta	9.51E-53	1.453	83.10	71.44	216.82
	Tc	1.06E-60	1.449	89.72	71.08	231.67
	Ti	3.63E-54	1.449	86.42	83.08	223.79
	V	2.08E-54	1.446	87.41	81.33	226.56
	W	4.16E-59	1.450	85.93	66.54	223.45
	Y	3.32E-17	1.463	73.79	48.26	193.31
	Zn	4.81E-54	1.447	82.89	111.69	215.57
	Zr	3.85E-30	1.458	79.99	60.31	208.69

600 K	Al	1.38E-29	1.447	82.19	105.85	212.01
	Co	1.33E-31	1.444	87.82	109.79	225.37
	Cr	3.32E-31	1.445	84.98	99.05	218.59
	Cu	3.31E-29	1.446	83.60	111.26	215.20
	Fe	1.96E-30	1.445	86.80	106.45	222.45
	Hf	1.41E-28	1.456	78.26	66.57	202.18
	Ir	4.50E-34	1.451	83.34	99.59	214.86
	Mn	5.01E-29	1.447	84.36	107.40	216.68
	Mo	1.37E-30	1.450	80.99	60.20	211.41
	Nb	6.70E-29	1.453	79.30	62.37	205.87
	Ni	2.41E-29	1.444	87.91	124.22	224.72
	Os	6.77E-36	1.450	87.40	84.31	224.67
	Pd	1.07E-28	1.451	84.22	114.17	216.33
	Pt	1.84E-30	1.452	85.39	117.22	219.57
	Re	3.94E-36	1.449	83.80	64.89	216.37
	Rh	3.07E-31	1.450	83.93	103.97	216.39
	Ru	1.94E-32	1.449	87.03	88.40	223.30
	Sc	6.37E-20	1.454	78.82	71.85	204.08
	Si	2.62E-28	1.444	81.42	109.21	210.97
	Ta	3.99E-29	1.453	79.53	69.48	206.83
	Tc	3.57E-33	1.449	86.31	69.43	222.09
	Ti	1.21E-29	1.449	82.19	80.49	212.04
	V	7.98E-30	1.446	83.32	78.74	215.37
	W	1.71E-32	1.450	81.49	64.59	211.30
	Y	6.40E-12	1.463	70.09	45.49	183.50
	Zn	1.83E-29	1.447	79.26	107.92	205.41
	Zr	4.14E-18	1.458	76.41	58.12	198.75

900 K	Al	2.67E-21	1.460	78.09	102.02	200.54
	Co	7.79E-23	1.458	83.25	105.42	212.92
	Cr	1.89E-22	1.460	80.55	97.81	206.30
	Cu	4.51E-21	1.459	79.40	106.78	203.60
	Fe	4.33E-22	1.459	82.79	102.51	211.17
	Hf	8.77E-21	1.469	74.45	63.95	191.38
	Ir	1.66E-24	1.464	78.43	95.93	201.56
	Mn	5.74E-21	1.460	79.93	103.39	204.32
	Mo	3.07E-22	1.463	76.52	58.03	199.39
	Nb	6.79E-21	1.467	75.43	60.16	194.99
	Ni	3.22E-21	1.458	83.41	119.62	212.43
	Os	9.62E-26	1.463	82.95	82.03	212.40
	Pd	7.51E-21	1.465	79.97	109.58	204.59
	Pt	4.64E-22	1.466	81.46	112.80	208.51
	Re	5.92E-26	1.462	79.64	62.96	204.68
	Rh	1.42E-22	1.463	81.32	100.08	208.54
	Ru	2.22E-23	1.463	81.84	85.28	209.27
	Sc	4.65E-15	1.468	74.85	68.41	193.15
	Si	1.26E-20	1.457	76.93	105.37	198.72
	Ta	4.89E-21	1.466	75.68	67.26	196.07
	Tc	6.45E-24	1.462	82.58	67.54	211.61
	Ti	2.79E-21	1.462	77.66	77.53	199.55
	V	1.24E-21	1.459	78.93	75.74	203.30
	W	1.49E-23	1.464	76.80	62.35	198.49
	Y	4.36E-10	1.478	66.07	42.28	172.76
	Zn	3.26E-21	1.461	75.37	103.55	194.51
	Zr	4.78E-14	1.471	72.51	55.63	187.98
1200 K	Al	4.01E-17	1.468	74.05	97.66	189.12
	Co	2.05E-18	1.466	78.64	100.44	200.17
	Cr	5.03E-18	1.470	76.36	96.40	194.54
	Cu	5.27E-17	1.468	75.12	101.67	191.82
	Fe	7.06E-18	1.467	78.58	98.03	199.37
	Hf	9.46E-17	1.477	70.28	61.02	179.94
	Ir	1.10E-19	1.471	74.09	91.80	189.59
	Mn	7.72E-17	1.468	75.17	98.83	191.02
	Mo	4.93E-18	1.471	72.16	55.60	187.20
	Nb	8.84E-17	1.474	71.15	57.67	183.10
	Ni	4.34E-17	1.466	78.73	114.40	199.93
	Os	1.26E-20	1.470	78.41	79.44	199.88
	Pd	6.43E-17	1.473	75.37	104.38	191.91
	Pt	8.07E-18	1.474	77.26	107.78	196.80
	Re	7.78E-21	1.470	75.64	60.79	193.23
	Rh	3.33E-18	1.471	78.20	95.68	199.36
	Ru	8.41E-19	1.470	76.45	81.76	194.62
	Sc	1.36E-12	1.476	70.61	64.51	181.48
	Si	9.78E-17	1.466	72.58	100.97	186.70
	Ta	5.90E-17	1.474	71.48	64.76	184.44
	Tc	2.99E-19	1.470	78.58	65.42	200.36
	Ti	4.45E-17	1.470	73.13	74.19	187.08
	V	1.56E-17	1.467	74.28	72.34	190.53
	W	4.69E-19	1.471	71.97	59.83	185.29
	Y	3.88E-09	1.486	61.73	38.61	161.06
	Zn	4.66E-17	1.469	71.46	98.56	183.42
	Zr	5.46E-12	1.479	68.31	52.84	176.45

Open in a new tab

Acknowledgements

This work was funded partially by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) under contract no. N0014-07-1-0638 and no. N00014-17-1-2567 and partially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China with Grant No. 51429101. First-principles calculations were carried out partially on the LION clusters supported by the Materials Simulation Center and the Research Computing and Cyber infrastructure unit at the Pennsylvania State University, partially on the resources of NERSC supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. DOE under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, and partially on the resources of XSEDE supported by National Science Foundation with Grant ACI-1053575. 51429101.

Footnotes

^{Transparency document}

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at 10.1016/j.dib.2018.08.144.

Transparency document. Supporting information

Supporting information

mmc1.docx^{(12.8KB, docx)}

References

1.Hargather C.Z., Shang S.L., Liu Z.K. A comprehensive first-principles study of solute elements in dilute Ni alloys: Diffusion coefficients and their implications to tailor creep rate. Acta Materialia. 2018;157:126–141. [Google Scholar]
2.Lidiard A.B. Impurity diffusion in crystals (mainly ionic crystals with the sodium chloride structure. Philos. Mag. Ser. 7. 1955;46(382):1218–1237. (CXXXIII) [Google Scholar]
3.LeClaire A.D., Lidiard A.B. Correlation effects in diffusion in crystals. Philos. Mag. 1956;1:518–527. [Google Scholar]
4.Kresse G., Furthmuller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B. 1996;54(16):11169–11186. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.54.11169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Methfessel M., Paxton A.T. High-precision sampling for brillouin-zone integration in metals. Phys. Rev. B. 1989;40:3616. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.40.3616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Blochl P.E., Jepsen O., Andersen O.K. Improved tetrahedron method for brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B. 1994;49:16223. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.49.16223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Touloukian Y.S. Hemisphere; New York, N.Y.: 1989. Properties of Selected Ferrous Alloying Elements. [Google Scholar]
8.Allison H.W., Samelson H. Diffusion of aluminum, magnesium, silicon, and zirconium in nickel. J. Appl. Phys. 1959;30(9):1419–1424. [Google Scholar]
9.Swalin R.A., Martin A., Olson R. Diffusion of magnesium, silicon, and molybdenum in nickel. J. Met. 1957;9:936. [Google Scholar]
10.Bergner D. Fremddiffusion von metallen: Beitrage von mikrosondenverfahren zur losung von diffusions problemen, (Ph.D. Thesis) Technische Universität Bergakademie; 1977. [Google Scholar]
11.Swalin R.A., Martin A. Solute diffusion in nickel-base substitutional solid solutions. J. Met. 1956;8:567. [Google Scholar]
12.Murarka S.P., Anand M.S., Agarwala R.P. Diffusion of vanadium in aluminium and nickel. Acta Metall. 1968;16(1):69–72. [Google Scholar]
13.Monma K., Suto H., Oikawa H. J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 1964;28:188. [Google Scholar]
14.Ruzichova J., Million B. Self-diffusion of the components in the F.C.C. phase of binary solid solutions of the Fe-Ni-Cr system. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1981;50(1):59–64. [Google Scholar]
15.Tutunnik A.D., Estoulin G.E. Fiz. Met. I Met. 1957;4:558. [Google Scholar]
16.Glinchuk M.D., Kalinovich D.F., Kovenskii I.I., Smolin M.D. Inzhenerno-Fiz. Zh. 1960;8:78. [Google Scholar]
17.Bakker H., Backus J., Waals F. A curvature in the Arrhenius plot for the diffusion of iron in single crystals of nickel in the temperature range from 1200 to 1400 C. Phys. Status Solidi (b) 1971;45(2):633–638. [Google Scholar]
18.Guiarldenq, Comptes Rendus de l’Acadmie des Sciences 254 (1962) 1994.
19.Badia M., Vignes A. Diffusion du fer, du nickel et du cobalt dans les metaux de transition du groupe du fer. Acta Metall. 1969;17(2):177–187. [Google Scholar]
20.Vladimirov A.B., Kaygorodov V.N., Klotsman S.M., Trakhtenberg I.H. Volumetrical diffusion of cobalt and tungsten in nickel. Phys. Met. Met. 1978;46:94–101. [Google Scholar]
21.Hirano K., Agarwala R.P., Averbach B.L., Cohen M. Diffusion in cobalt-nickel alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 1962;33(10):3049–3054. [Google Scholar]
22.Hassner A., Lange W. Volumenselbst diffusion in Kobalt – nickel – legierungen. Phys. Status Solidi (b) 1965;8(1):77–91. [Google Scholar]
23.Divya V.D., Ramamurty U., Paul A. Diffusion in Co-Ni system studied by multifoil technique. In: Ochsner A., Murch G.E., Delgado J.M.P., editors. Diffusion in Solids and Liquids VI: Defect and Diffusion Forum. 312–315. 2011. pp. 466–471. [Google Scholar]
24.McCoy H.E., Jr., Murdock J.F. Influence of argon and hydrogen environments on the rate of diffusion of cobalt-60 in nickel. Am. Soc. Met., Trans. Q. 1963;56:11. [Google Scholar]
25.Monma K., Suto H., Oikawa H. Diffusion of Ni-63 and W-l89 in nickel-tungsten alloys. J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 1964;28:197. [Google Scholar]
26.Zeng Q., Ma S., Zheng Y., Liu S., Zhai T. A study of Re and Al diffusion in Ni. J. Alloy. Compd. 2009;480(2):987–990. [Google Scholar]
27.Y. Minamino, T. Yamane, K. Hirao, S.B. Jung, H. Yoshida. Diffusion of platinum and molybdenum in Ni and Ni₃Al, In: H. Mehrer, Chr. Herzig, N.A. Stolwijk, H. Bracht, (Eds.), Diffusion in Materials DIMAT: Defect and Diffusion Forum Trans Tech Publications Switzerland, 143 (1997) 257-262. http://www.scientific.net/DDF.143-147.
28.Shang S.L., Kim D.E., Zacherl C.L., Wang Y., Du Y., Liu Z.K. Effects of alloying elements and temperature on the elastic properties of dilute Ni-base superalloys from first-principles calculations. J. Appl. Phys. 2012;112(5):053515. [Google Scholar]
29.Shang S.L., Zacherl C.L., Fang H.Z., Wang Y., Du Y., Liu Z.K. Effects of alloying element and temperature on the stacking fault energies of dilute Ni-base superalloys. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2012;24(50):505403. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/24/50/505403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting information

mmc1.docx^{(12.8KB, docx)}

[bib1] 1.Hargather C.Z., Shang S.L., Liu Z.K. A comprehensive first-principles study of solute elements in dilute Ni alloys: Diffusion coefficients and their implications to tailor creep rate. Acta Materialia. 2018;157:126–141. [Google Scholar]

[bib2] 2.Lidiard A.B. Impurity diffusion in crystals (mainly ionic crystals with the sodium chloride structure. Philos. Mag. Ser. 7. 1955;46(382):1218–1237. (CXXXIII) [Google Scholar]

[bib3] 3.LeClaire A.D., Lidiard A.B. Correlation effects in diffusion in crystals. Philos. Mag. 1956;1:518–527. [Google Scholar]

[bib4] 4.Kresse G., Furthmuller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B. 1996;54(16):11169–11186. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.54.11169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib5] 5.Methfessel M., Paxton A.T. High-precision sampling for brillouin-zone integration in metals. Phys. Rev. B. 1989;40:3616. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.40.3616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib6] 6.Blochl P.E., Jepsen O., Andersen O.K. Improved tetrahedron method for brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B. 1994;49:16223. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.49.16223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib7] 7.Touloukian Y.S. Hemisphere; New York, N.Y.: 1989. Properties of Selected Ferrous Alloying Elements. [Google Scholar]

[bib8] 8.Allison H.W., Samelson H. Diffusion of aluminum, magnesium, silicon, and zirconium in nickel. J. Appl. Phys. 1959;30(9):1419–1424. [Google Scholar]

[bib9] 9.Swalin R.A., Martin A., Olson R. Diffusion of magnesium, silicon, and molybdenum in nickel. J. Met. 1957;9:936. [Google Scholar]

[bib10] 10.Bergner D. Fremddiffusion von metallen: Beitrage von mikrosondenverfahren zur losung von diffusions problemen, (Ph.D. Thesis) Technische Universität Bergakademie; 1977. [Google Scholar]

[bib11] 11.Swalin R.A., Martin A. Solute diffusion in nickel-base substitutional solid solutions. J. Met. 1956;8:567. [Google Scholar]

[bib12] 12.Murarka S.P., Anand M.S., Agarwala R.P. Diffusion of vanadium in aluminium and nickel. Acta Metall. 1968;16(1):69–72. [Google Scholar]

[bib13] 13.Monma K., Suto H., Oikawa H. J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 1964;28:188. [Google Scholar]

[bib14] 14.Ruzichova J., Million B. Self-diffusion of the components in the F.C.C. phase of binary solid solutions of the Fe-Ni-Cr system. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1981;50(1):59–64. [Google Scholar]

[bib15] 15.Tutunnik A.D., Estoulin G.E. Fiz. Met. I Met. 1957;4:558. [Google Scholar]

[bib16] 16.Glinchuk M.D., Kalinovich D.F., Kovenskii I.I., Smolin M.D. Inzhenerno-Fiz. Zh. 1960;8:78. [Google Scholar]

[bib17] 17.Bakker H., Backus J., Waals F. A curvature in the Arrhenius plot for the diffusion of iron in single crystals of nickel in the temperature range from 1200 to 1400 C. Phys. Status Solidi (b) 1971;45(2):633–638. [Google Scholar]

[bib18] 18.Guiarldenq, Comptes Rendus de l’Acadmie des Sciences 254 (1962) 1994.

[bib19] 19.Badia M., Vignes A. Diffusion du fer, du nickel et du cobalt dans les metaux de transition du groupe du fer. Acta Metall. 1969;17(2):177–187. [Google Scholar]

[bib20] 20.Vladimirov A.B., Kaygorodov V.N., Klotsman S.M., Trakhtenberg I.H. Volumetrical diffusion of cobalt and tungsten in nickel. Phys. Met. Met. 1978;46:94–101. [Google Scholar]

[bib21] 21.Hirano K., Agarwala R.P., Averbach B.L., Cohen M. Diffusion in cobalt-nickel alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 1962;33(10):3049–3054. [Google Scholar]

[bib22] 22.Hassner A., Lange W. Volumenselbst diffusion in Kobalt – nickel – legierungen. Phys. Status Solidi (b) 1965;8(1):77–91. [Google Scholar]

[bib23] 23.Divya V.D., Ramamurty U., Paul A. Diffusion in Co-Ni system studied by multifoil technique. In: Ochsner A., Murch G.E., Delgado J.M.P., editors. Diffusion in Solids and Liquids VI: Defect and Diffusion Forum. 312–315. 2011. pp. 466–471. [Google Scholar]

[bib24] 24.McCoy H.E., Jr., Murdock J.F. Influence of argon and hydrogen environments on the rate of diffusion of cobalt-60 in nickel. Am. Soc. Met., Trans. Q. 1963;56:11. [Google Scholar]

[bib25] 25.Monma K., Suto H., Oikawa H. Diffusion of Ni-63 and W-l89 in nickel-tungsten alloys. J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 1964;28:197. [Google Scholar]

[bib26] 26.Zeng Q., Ma S., Zheng Y., Liu S., Zhai T. A study of Re and Al diffusion in Ni. J. Alloy. Compd. 2009;480(2):987–990. [Google Scholar]

[bib27] 27.Y. Minamino, T. Yamane, K. Hirao, S.B. Jung, H. Yoshida. Diffusion of platinum and molybdenum in Ni and Ni₃Al, In: H. Mehrer, Chr. Herzig, N.A. Stolwijk, H. Bracht, (Eds.), Diffusion in Materials DIMAT: Defect and Diffusion Forum Trans Tech Publications Switzerland, 143 (1997) 257-262. http://www.scientific.net/DDF.143-147.

[bib28] 28.Shang S.L., Kim D.E., Zacherl C.L., Wang Y., Du Y., Liu Z.K. Effects of alloying elements and temperature on the elastic properties of dilute Ni-base superalloys from first-principles calculations. J. Appl. Phys. 2012;112(5):053515. [Google Scholar]

[bib29] 29.Shang S.L., Zacherl C.L., Fang H.Z., Wang Y., Du Y., Liu Z.K. Effects of alloying element and temperature on the stacking fault energies of dilute Ni-base superalloys. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2012;24(50):505403. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/24/50/505403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Data set for diffusion coefficients and relative creep rate ratios of 26 dilute Ni-X alloy systems from first-principles calculations

Chelsey Z Hargather

Shun-Li Shang

Zi-Kui Liu

Abstract

1. Computational methodology

2. Data

2.1. 0 K results

Fig. 1.

2.2. Atomic jump frequencies and thermodynamic parameters for all 26Ni31X systems

Table 1.

Table 2.

2.3. Dilute solute diffusivity plots

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 12.

Fig. 13.

Fig. 14.

Fig. 15.

2.3.1. 2nd row solute elements

2.3.2. 3d transition row solute elements

2.3.3. 4d transition row solute elements

2.3.4. 5d transition row solute elements

2.4. Relative creep rate ratio data table

Table 3.

Acknowledgements

Footnotes

Transparency document. Supporting information

References

Further reading

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases

2.2. Atomic jump frequencies and thermodynamic parameters for all $26 {Ni}_{31}$ X systems