Chlamydia trachomatis is the number one sexually transmitted bacterial pathogen worldwide. A substantial proportion of C. trachomatis-infected women develop infertility, pelvic inflammatory syndrome, and other serious complications. C. trachomatis is also a leading infectious cause of blindness in underdeveloped countries. The pathogen has a unique developmental cycle that is transcriptionally regulated. The discovery of an expanded role for the Chlamydia-specific transcription factor GrgA helps us understand the progression of the chlamydial developmental cycle.
KEYWORDS: σ28, σ66, CT504, CTL0766, Chlamydia, GrgA, transcription, transcription factor
ABSTRACT
The obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis has a unique developmental cycle consisting of two contrasting cellular forms. Whereas the primary Chlamydia sigma factor, σ66, is involved in the expression of the majority of chlamydial genes throughout the developmental cycle, expression of several late genes requires the alternative sigma factor, σ28. In prior work, we identified GrgA as a Chlamydia-specific transcription factor that activates σ66-dependent transcription by binding DNA and interacting with a nonconserved region (NCR) of σ66. Here, we extend these findings by showing GrgA can also activate σ28-dependent transcription through direct interaction with σ28. We measure the binding affinity of GrgA for both σ66 and σ28, and we identify regions of GrgA important for σ28-dependent transcription. Similar to results obtained with σ66, we find that GrgA's interaction with σ28 involves an NCR located upstream of conserved region 2 of σ28. Our findings suggest that GrgA is an important regulator of both σ66- and σ28-dependent transcription in C. trachomatis and further highlight NCRs of bacterial RNA polymerase as targets for regulatory factors unique to particular organisms.
IMPORTANCE Chlamydia trachomatis is the number one sexually transmitted bacterial pathogen worldwide. A substantial proportion of C. trachomatis-infected women develop infertility, pelvic inflammatory syndrome, and other serious complications. C. trachomatis is also a leading infectious cause of blindness in underdeveloped countries. The pathogen has a unique developmental cycle that is transcriptionally regulated. The discovery of an expanded role for the Chlamydia-specific transcription factor GrgA helps us understand the progression of the chlamydial developmental cycle.
INTRODUCTION
Each year, ∼60% of the 2.2 million cases of notifiable infections reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are due to the sexually transmitted pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis (1, 2). In addition, because the infection is mostly asymptomatic, the CDC estimates only 1 of 10 people infected with C. trachomatis is reported (3). Nonetheless, without antibiotic treatment, the infection often leads to serious complications, such as infertility and pelvic inflammatory syndrome in women. Furthermore, some C. trachomatis serotypes cause ocular infection and are still the most common infectious microbes associated with blindness in underdeveloped countries (4, 5).
Like other chlamydiae, C. trachomatis is an obligate intracellular Gram-negative bacterium that exists in two cellular forms with contrasting properties (6). The small elementary body (EB) is infectious and capable of extracellular survival but is incapable of proliferation. Following binding to a cellular receptor(s), the EB enters a host cell membrane-derived vacuole through endocytosis (7). Within the vacuole, termed inclusion, the EB differentiates into a larger cellular form, termed reticulate body (RB), within several hours. No longer infectious, the RB divides exponentially by binary fission until around 20 h, when a significant portion of RBs redifferentiate back into EBs, while some RBs continue to proliferate (8). Progeny EBs along with residual RBs are released from infected cells following cell lysis. Alternatively, whole inclusions may be released from infected cells (9).
The 1-million-bp C. trachomatis genome carries fewer than 1,000 genes (10). Microarray analyses demonstrated that the majority of these genes are transcribed starting a few hours postinoculation throughout the remaining developmental cycle, whereas a small number of genes are transcribed immediately following cell entry and another small set of genes are transcribed only at late stages (11, 12). Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) detected distinct sets of gene transcripts specifically enriched in either EBs or RBs (13), and purified EBs and RBs have been found to transcribe different sets of genes in axenic media (14). These findings suggest that the progression of the chlamydial developmental cycle is transcriptionally regulated.
Transcription is initiated following binding of the RNA polymerase (RNAP) to the gene promoter (15). The bacterial RNAP holoenzyme is comprised of the catalytic core enzyme and a σ factor, which is required for promoter recognition (16). Transcription of the vast majority of C. trachomatis genes involves σ66, a homolog of σ70 that is often referred to as the housekeeping σ factor in eubacteria (16). Expression of some (but not all) chlamydial late genes depends on σ28. Several genes possess both a σ66 promoter and a σ28 promoter (17).
GrgA (with gene codes CT_504 and CTL0766 for C. trachomatis serovars D and L2, respectively) is a Chlamydia-specific transcription activator (18). It was identified as a protein bound to the σ66-dependent promoter of defA, which encodes peptide deformylase, an enzyme required for bacterial protein maturation and regulated protein degradation. In addition to defA, a midcycle gene, GrgA also stimulates transcription from another midcycle promoter (ompA), an early promoter (rRNA P1), and a late promoter (hctA), suggesting that GrgA functions as a general activator of σ66-dependent genes (18). In this report, we demonstrate that GrgA also stimulates σ28-dependent gene transcription in vitro. Thus, our findings suggest that GrgA plays an expanded role in gene expression during the C. trachomatis developmental cycle as a regulator of both σ66- and σ28-dependent transcription.
RESULTS
GrgA physically interacts with σ28.
To assess whether GrgA potentially regulates expression of σ28-dependent genes, we determined whether GrgA can interact with σ28. We performed protein pulldown assays using differential epitope tagging. The Strep-Tactin beads, which have affinity for the Strep-tag (19), precipitated NH-σ28 (N-terminally poly-His-tagged C. trachomatis σ28) in a manner that was dependent on the N-terminally Strep-tagged GrgA (NS-GrgA) (Fig. 1A). Reciprocally, NH-GrgA was pulled down in an NS-σ28-dependent manner (Fig. 1B). The results establish that GrgA can directly interact with σ28.
FIG 1.
GrgA physically interacts with σ28. (A) Pulldown of NH-σ28 by Strep-Tactin bead-immobilized NS-GrgA. Shown is a Western blot detecting NH-σ28. (B) Pulldown of NH-GrgA by Strep-Tactin bead-immobilized NS-σ28. Shown is a Western blot detecting NH-GrgA.
GrgA has a lower affinity for σ28 than for σ66.
We next determined the binding affinities of GrgA for both σ28 and σ66. We first compared the efficiencies of the σ factors in GrgA binding by performing competitive pulldown assays. As expected, NS-GrgA efficiently pulled down NH-σ28 and CH-σ66 in separate reactions (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). However, in the presence of equal molar concentrations of NH-σ28 and CH-σ66, NS-GrgA pulled down only CH-σ66 but not NH-σ28 (Fig. S1), indicating that GrgA has a lower affinity for σ28 than σ66.
We quantitatively characterized GrgA binding by σ28 and σ66 with biolayer interferometry (BLI) using the BLItz system, which detects light wavelength shifts at the biosensor tip with an immobilized ligand following binding of an analyte in a real-time manner (20). Whereas representative BLItz recordings using NH-GrgA as a ligand and either CS-σ66 or NS-σ28 as an analyte are shown in Fig. S2A and B, values of kinetic parameters are provided in Table 1. The CS-σ66 analyte yielded a statistically highly significant 25-fold higher association rate constant (ka) than that of the NS-σ28 analyte, suggesting that CS-σ66 binds NH-GrgA much faster than NS-σ28. CS-σ66 also demonstrated a 3-fold statistically significant increase in disassociation rate constant (kd), suggestive of moderately higher dissociation from NH-GrgA. Compared to the NH-GrgA–CS-σ66 interaction, the NH-GrgA–NS-σ28 interaction had a 32-fold higher disassociation equilibrium constant (KD), indicating that GrgA has a lower overall affinity for σ28 than for σ66.
TABLE 1.
GrgA binds σ66 with a higher affinity than σ28a
Ligand | Analyte | n |
ka |
kd |
KD |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1/Ms | % control | 1/s | % control | M | % control | |||
NH-GrgA | CS-σ66 | 6 | (1.9 ± 1.3) × 106 | 100 | (9.3 ± 5.2) × 10−3 | 100 | (6.9 ± 5.9) × 10−9 | 100 |
NH-GrgA | NS-σ28 | 8 | (1.5 ± 1.7) × 104; P = 0.001 | 4.0 | (2.8 ± 0.8) × 10−3; P = 0.001 | 30 | (2.2 ± 1.1) × 10−7; P < 0.001 | 3,188 |
CH-σ66 | NS-GrgA | 4 | (7.7 ± 1.3) × 105 | 100 | (8.9 ± 0.6) × 10−3 | 100 | (1.2 ± 0.1) × 10−8 | 100 |
NH-σ28 | NS-GrgA | 6 | (2.1 ± 0.9) × 105; P < 0.001 | 27 | (5.6 ± 1.2) × 10−2; P < 0.001 | 629 | (3.4 ± 2.0) × 10−7; P = 0.013 | 2,833 |
BLItz assays were performed with His biosensors using the indicated ligand and analyte pairs. Representative graphs of recordings are shown in Fig. S2. Values of kinetic parameters (averages ± SDs) were generated by the BLItz Pro software (20). ka (association rate constant) is defined as the number of complexes formed per second in a 1 M solution of ligand and analyte (1/Ms). kd (disassociation rate constant) is defined as the number of complexes that decay per second (1/s). KD (disassociation equilibrium constant), defined as the concentration at which 50% of ligand binding sites are occupied by the analytes, is kd divided by ka. n, number of experimental repeats. P values were calculated using 2-tailed Student's t tests.
We performed reciprocal BLI using CH-σ66 and NH-σ28 as ligands and NS-GrgA as the analyte to validate the difference in GrgA binding by the σ factors presented above (Table 1 and Fig. S2C and D). Consistent with the trend in ka value changes presented above, the NS-GrgA analyte also demonstrated a statistically significantly higher ka for CH-σ66 than for NH-σ28, although the difference is smaller (25-fold versus 3.7-fold). Interestingly, the kd values reveal that NS-GrgA also dissociates from CH-σ66 6-fold slower than that from NH-σ28. Compared to the CH-σ66–NS-GrgA interaction, the NH-σ28–NS-GrgA interaction had a 28-fold higher KD, which is nearly identical to the 32-fold higher KD detected for the NH-GrgA–NS-σ28 interaction versus the NH-GrgA–CS-σ66 interaction. Thus, competitive pulldown assays and BLI establish that GrgA has a lower affinity for σ28 than for σ66.
GrgA stimulates σ28-dependent transcription.
To determine whether GrgA can stimulate σ28-dependent transcription, we performed in vitro transcription assays using pMT1212, a transcription reporter plasmid carrying the promoter of a gene encoding a histone-like protein (hctB) in C. trachomatis (21). Consistent with previous findings (21), transcription from the hctB promoter required the addition of NH-σ28 to the C. trachomatis RNAP (cRNAP) (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, GrgA demonstrated a dose-dependent stimulatory effect on the transcription from the promoter (Fig. 2B and C). These data suggest that GrgA can increase the expression of genes with a σ28-dependent promoter in addition to genes with a σ66-dependent promoter (18).
FIG 2.
GrgA stimulates σ28-dependent transcription using C. trachomatis RNAP. (A) Transcription from the C. trachomatis hctB promoter in the pMT1212 report plasmid is dependent on the addition of NH-σ28 to the chlamydial RNAP. (B) Gel image showing dose-dependent stimulation of transcription from the hctB promoter by GrgA. (C) Averages and SDs for three independent measurements are shown. (B and C) Molar ratios of GrgA to σ28 were 0, 10, 20, and 33.
Residues 138 to 165 in GrgA are required for binding both σ28 and DNA and for activating σ28-dependent transcription.
A series of His-tagged GrgA deletion mutants (Fig. S3A and B) were tested for the effects on transcription from the hctB promoter (Fig. 3A). Noticeably, GrgAΔ114-165 was completely defective in activating transcription from the σ28-dependent promoter, whereas GrgAΔ1-64 also demonstrated a significant 50% loss of transcription activation activity (Fig. 3A). Deletion of other regions (residues 65 to 113, 166 to 266, and 207 to 288) from GrgA had either no or minimal effects on transcription activation (Fig. 3A).
FIG 3.
Residues 138 to 165 in GrgA are required for binding both σ28 and DNA and for activating σ28-dependent transcription. (A) Efficient stimulation of transcription from the hctB promoter requires the N-terminal residues 1 to 64 and the middle region (residues 114 to 165). One micromolar full-length GrgA (FL) or the indicated deletion mutant was used in each assay. p1 is the P value between basal transcription activity (without GrgA) and activity with GrgA (FL or mutant); p2 is the P value between FL and the deletion mutant (paired t tests of three independent experiments); na, not applicable. (B) Pulldown of NH-GrgA full length (FL) and Δ1-64 but not Δ114-165 by Strep-Tactin bead-immobilized NS-σ28. GrgA and deletion mutants were detected by Western blotting using a mouse anti-GrgA antibody, because the anti-His used in panels A and B does not recognize Δ1-64 (18). (C) Δ138-165 but not Δ114-137 is defective in DNA binding, like Δ114-165. Electrophoresis mobility shift assays (EMSA) were performed using a radiolabeled DNA fragment carrying sequences extending from position −144 to +52 of the defA gene (18) in the presence of the indicated concentrations of wild-type GrgA or the indicated GrgA mutant. (D) Δ138-165 but not Δ114-137 is defective in σ28 binding. Protein pulldown and detection were performed as described for panel B, with the exception of detection via anti-His. (E) Δ138-165 but not Δ114-137 is fully defective in activating transcription from the hctB promoter. See the legend to Fig. 2D for experimental and statistical information.
Our previous studies have shown that deletion of residues 114 to 165 disables GrgA's DNA binding, leading to loss of stimulation of transcription from σ66-dependent promoters, whereas removal of residues 1 to 64 disables σ66 binding, also causing a defect in activating σ66-dependent transcription (18). Therefore, the results shown in Fig. 3A suggest that (i) DNA binding is also required for σ28-dependent transcription and (ii) the N-terminal σ66-interacting region interacts with σ28 as well. Surprisingly, pulldown assays demonstrated that GrgAΔ114-165 is completely defective in σ28 binding, whereas GrgAΔ1-64 appeared to have only a slightly decreased σ28-binding activity (Fig. 3B).
We performed a series of deletions within the 114-165 region to define the elements required for interacting with either DNA or σ28. Since residues 114 to 138 are predicted to have coiled and stranded structures, whereas residues 139 to 158 are rich in positively charged lysine and aspartate and are predicted to form a helix (Fig. S4), we expected GrgAΔ114-137 but not GrgAΔ138-165 to retain DNA-binding activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) confirmed this prediction (Fig. 3C). Interestingly, GrgAΔ114-137 but not GrgAΔ138-165 also retained σ28-binding activity (Fig. 3D). Not surprisingly, GrgAΔ114-137 but not GrgAΔ138-165 retained the capacity to activate σ28-dependent transcription (Fig. 3E). Additional and extensive deletion mutagenesis and functional analyses for the region of residues 138 to 165 failed to (i) separate residues required for σ28 binding from residues required for DNA binding (Fig. S5 and S6), and (ii) define a smaller region fully required for binding either σ28 or DNA (Fig. S5 and S6). These studies suggest that σ28 and DNA bind to the same region in GrgA and further confirm that σ28 and DNA binding are required for activation of σ28-dependent transcription (Fig. S7).
Residues 1 to 64 in GrgA contribute to σ28 binding.
Transcription assays showed a 50% loss of activity in activating σ28-dependent transcription in the GrgAΔ1-64 mutant (Fig. 3A). We used the BLItz system (20) to confirm decreased σ28-binding activity in Δ1-64. Representative BLItz recordings of binding experiments using full-length NH-GrgA or deletion mutants as ligands and NS-σ28 as analyte are shown in Fig. S8A to D, and kinetic parameters are provided in Table 2. Compared to the full-length NH-GrgA, NS-σ28 revealed a moderately slowed association with and a moderately accelerated dissociation from NH-GrgAΔ1-64, as indicated by a nearly 3-fold decrease in the ka and a 2-fold increase in the kd (Table 2). These changes resulted in a highly significant 4.8-fold increase in the KD value. On the other hand, NH-GrgAΔ114-137, which retains the activity to activate σ28-dependent transcription (Fig. 3E), demonstrated no changes in kinetic parameters for interaction with NS-σ28 (Table 2). In contrast to NH-GrgAΔ114-137, NH-GrgAΔ138-165 immediately and completely dissociated from NS-σ28 upon washing (Fig. S8D), leading to a 1.5 × 106 times higher kd and a 3.1 × 106 times higher KD (Table 2), which are fully consistent with pulldown data (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, unlike NS-σ28, which retained a low affinity for NH-GrgAΔ1-64 (relative to full-length NH-GrgA), CS-σ66 quickly and completely dissociated from NH-GrgAΔ1-64 upon washing (Fig. S8E), which is consistent with pulldown data previously reported (18). Taken together, the BLItz data shown in Fig. S8 and Table 2 indicate that the decreased affinity with NS-σ28 in NH-GrgAΔ1-64 is responsible for the partial loss of activity in activating σ28-dependent transcription (Fig. 3A).
TABLE 2.
Deletion of amino acids 1 to 64 from GrgA negatively affects σ28 bindinga
Ligand | n |
ka |
kd |
KD |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1/Ms | % control | 1/s | % control | M | % control | ||
NH-GrgA | 8 | (1.5 ± 1.7) × 104 | 100 | (2.8 ± 0.8) × 10−3 | 100 | (2.2 ± 1.1) × 10−7 | 100 |
NH-GrgAΔ1-64 | 4 | (5.6 ± 2.8) × 103; P = 0.037 | 37 | (5.8 ± 2.3) × 10−3; P = 0.009 | 200 | (1.1 ± 0.2) × 10−6; P < 0.001 | 479 |
NH-GrgAΔ114-137 | 4 | (1.5 ± 0.4) × 104; P = 0.947 | 98 | (3.5 ± 0.5) × 10−3; P = 0.128 | 124 | (2.5 ± 0.3) × 10−7; P = 0.658 | 112 |
NH-GrgAΔ138-165 | 2 | (5.6 ± 0.1) × 103; P = 0.125 | 37 | (4.1 ± 0.3) × 102; P = 0.002 | 1.5 × 108 | (6.9 ± 4.5) × 10−2; P < 0.001 | 3.1 × 108 |
Indicated His-tagged proteins were immobilized on His biosensors as ligands for the NS-σ28 analyte in BLItz assays. Representative graphs of BLItz recordings are shown in Fig. S8. See Table 1 for information regarding kinetic parameters and statistics.
The N terminus of σ28 is most critical for binding GrgA.
We constructed NH-σ28 variants with deletion of the N-terminal leader sequence, σ factor region 2, 3, or 4 (unlike the housekeeping σ factor, σ28, does not contain region 1) (Fig. 4A). All deletion mutants (i.e., NH-σ28ΔNL, NH-σ28ΔR2, NH-σ28ΔR3, and NH-σ28ΔR4) were expressed in Escherichia coli (Fig. 4B). Noticeably, in pulldown assays, NS-GrgA completely failed to pull down the NH-σ28ΔNL and NH-σ28ΔR2 mutants and pulled down only small amounts of NH-σ28ΔR3 and NH-σ28ΔR4 compared to full-length NH-σ28 (Fig. 4C).
FIG 4.
N-terminal leader sequence and region 2 of σ28 are required for interaction with GrgA. (A) Schematic of σ28 and mutants lacking the indicated regions. (B) Western blot showing expression of purified NH-σ28 and mutants. (C) Precipitation of NH-σ28 and mutants by Strep-Tactin-immobilized NS-GrgA. Shown is a Western blot detecting NH-σ28 or mutant. All proteins were resolved via SDS-PAGE and detected using an anti-His antibody.
In BLItz assays, the rate of association with NH-GrgA varied greatly among the σ28 deletion mutants. Whereas NH-σ28ΔNL had essentially the same ka as full-length NH-σ28, NH-σ28ΔR2 displayed a significant 2-fold reduction in ka. In contrast, NH-σ28ΔR3 and NH-σ28ΔR4 showed a 3.5-fold increase and a 50% increase in ka, respectively (Table 3). All mutants demonstrated dramatic increases (10- to 383-fold) in the kd (Table 3). Consequently, NH-σ28ΔNL and NH-σ28ΔR2 had 345- and 177-fold higher KD values, respectively, whereas NH-σ28ΔR3 and NH-σ28ΔR4 both demonstrated 7-fold higher KD values (Table 3). Representative graphs of BLItz recordings are shown in Fig. S9. Taken together, both the pulldown (Fig. 4) and BLI data (Table 3) indicate that the N terminus of σ28 (i.e., NL and R2) interacts with GrgA while R3 and R4 stabilize the GrgA-σ28 binding. Figure 5 summarizes domain structures of GrgA, σ66 and σ28, and modes of interaction between GrgA and the σ factors.
TABLE 3.
The N-terminal leader sequence and region 2 of σ28 are required for GrgA bindinga
Analyte | n |
ka |
kd |
KD |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1/Ms | % control | 1/s | % control | M | % control | ||
NH-σ28 | 3 | (2.2 ± 0.4) × 104 | 100 | (4.7 ± 0.1) × 10−3 | 100 | (2.2 ± 0.3) × 10−7 | 100 |
NH-σ28Δ1-13 | 3 | (2.4 ± 0.4) × 104; P = 0.649 | 109 | (1.8 ± 0.2) × 100; P < 0.001 | 38,297 | (7.6 ± 0.5) × 10−5; P < 0.001 | 34,545 |
NH-σ28ΔR2 | 3 | (1.3 ± 0.4) × 104; P = 0.044 | 59 | (5.3 ± 0.3) × 10−1; P = 0.036 | 11,276 | (3.9 ± 1.1) × 10−5; P = 0.003 | 17,727 |
NH-σ28ΔR3 | 3 | (8.0 ± 1.6) × 104; P = 0.004 | 363 | (1.2 ± 0.2) × 10−1; P < 0.001 | 2,553 | (1.5 ± 0.2) × 10−6; P < 0.001 | 714 |
NH-σ28ΔR4 | 3 | (3.3 ± 0.5) × 104; P = 0.038 | 150 | (4.9 ± 0.3) × 10−2; P = 0.004 | 1,043 | (1.5 ± 0.6) × 10−6; P = 0.018 | 714 |
Biotinylated NH-GrgA was immobilized on streptavidin biosensors as the ligand for the indicated analytes in BLItz assays. Representative graphs of recordings are shown in Fig. S9. See Table 1 for information regarding kinetic parameters and statistics.
FIG 5.
Domain structures of GrgA, σ66 and σ28, and modes of interaction between GrgA and the σ factors. R1, R2, R3, and R4 are regions conserved across bacterial species. In addition to the nonconserved region (NCR) between R1 and R2 in σ66, the N-terminal leader sequences, shown in light color, of both σ66 and σ28 are also nonconserved. Numbers on GrgA indicate positions of amino acid residues.
DISCUSSION
As an obligate intracellular bacterium, C. trachomatis faces unique challenges at every stage in the developmental cycle (22). Proper expression of certain genes is required for meeting those challenges (11, 12, 23). Surprisingly, only two transcription activators have been identified in C. trachomatis (24). GrgA was first identified as a transcription activator for σ66-dependent genes (18). However, the present study has demonstrated that GrgA potentially stimulates expression of σ28-dependent genes as well. Transcription of chlamydial genes is temporally controlled during the developmental cycle (11, 12, 17, 25, 26). Whereas σ66 is involved in transcription of most C. trachomatis genes, some late promoters are recognized by σ28 (17). Microarray studies have shown that synthesis of the σ28 mRNA temporally falls behind that of the σ66 mRNA (11, 12). Thus, it would be safe to assume that GrgA activates σ66-dependent genes in earlier developmental stages. The high concentration of GrgA in the EB (18, 27, 28) also supports the notion that GrgA plays a critical role in activating transcription of immediate-early and early genes, which are dependent on σ66 but not σ28. Protein products of these genes, including (but not limited to) TARP (translocated actin recruiting phosphoprotein), Npt1 ATP/ADP translocase, and Inc proteins (inclusion membrane proteins) are critical for cell entry, acquiring energy from the host cell, and establishing and maintaining a niche for chlamydial growth and development inside the inclusion (11, 29, 30). GrgA may also stimulate expression of genes that are important for EB survival. Although the EB was long regarded as a metabolic inert cellular form, active transcription and translation are readily detectable in isolated EBs (14). The presence of GrgA in RBs suggests that GrgA activates midcycle genes that are required for growth and late genes that are needed for conversion of RBs back to EBs. Significantly, we have shown that GrgA activates transcription from σ66-dependent early, mid-stage, and late gene promoters in vitro (18).
Whether or not GrgA also regulates expression of σ28-dependent genes during later developmental stages likely depends on the expression levels of GrgA, σ28, and σ66. If GrgA is limited, σ28 would have to be present at significantly higher concentrations than σ66 to effectively compete for GrgA. However, in a quantitative whole-proteomic mass spectrometry study by Skipp et al., higher levels of GrgA relative to σ66 were detected in both EBs and RBs purified from the midcycle, whereas σ28 was undetected in either cellular form (28). Thus, GrgA could stimulate transcription from σ28-dependent promoters in addition to σ66-dependent promoters regardless of the molar ratio of the two σ factors. It should be pointed out that another quantitative proteomic study, carried out by Saka at al., failed to detect GrgA in the RBs (27). They also detected a lower concentration of GrgA than σ66 (27). Whereas reasons for the discrepancy between the two proteomic studies are unclear, we found that GrgA is readily detectable in RBs (18). Accurate quantification of GrgA and σ factors in different stages of the developmental cycle is needed to elucidate roles of GrgA in the expression of σ66- and/or σ28-dependent genes throughout the developmental cycle.
We used both pulldown assays and BLI to analyze the interaction of GrgA with σ28 and σ66. Clearly, owing to its quantitative nature, BLI offers higher sensitivities than protein pulldown assays in studying protein-protein interaction. This led to the conclusion that decreased affinity for σ28 in GrgAΔ1-64, which was ambiguous in pulldown assays, is the most probable cause for a 50% loss of activity in activating σ28-dependent transcription.
We have defined a middle region in GrgA (residues 138 to 165) as a σ28- and DNA-binding domain (Fig. 3 and 5). Extensive deletion mutagenesis in this region failed to divide it into subdomains that bind either σ28 or DNA but not both (Fig. S5 and S6). We speculate that multiple positively charged residues (K138, K139, R142, R143, K144, K147, K150, K152, K154-156, R159-161, and/or K164) interact with negatively charged DNA, whereas negatively charged residues (E141, E145, E149, D153, and/or E165) interact with σ28.
GrgA has demonstrated similar but nonidentical properties in activating σ66- and σ28-dependent transcription (Fig. 5). Apparently, sequence-nonspecific DNA binding is required for activating both σ66-dependent transcription (18) and σ28-dependent transcription (Fig. 3A and E and 5 and Fig. S7). However, the N-terminal region (residues 1 to 64) of GrgA has a stronger role in σ66-dependent transcription (18) than in σ28-dependent transcription (Fig. 3A), because this region is absolutely required for GrgA to interact with σ66 (18) but plays only a supportive role in binding σ28, which was clearly evident only with BLI (Table 2) but appeared uncertain with pulldown assays (Fig. 3B).
Whereas the major GrgA structural determinants for binding σ28 and σ66 differ, there is similarity between the GrgA-binding regions in the two σ factors (Fig. 5). The GrgA-binding sequence in σ66 is the last portion of the nonconserved region immediately upstream of conserved region 2, whereas the GrgA-binding sequence in σ28 also involves the N-terminal nonconserved leader sequence (and the immediately downstream region 2). To the best of our knowledge, GrgA is the only transcription factor that targets nonconserved regions of σ factors (16).
In summary, we have demonstrated that the Chlamydia-specific protein GrgA can activate both σ66-dependent transcription and σ28-dependent transcription in vitro. Current knowledge suggests that GrgA activates σ66-dependent genes throughout the developmental cycle. Whether or not GrgA also regulates expression of σ28-dependent late genes likely depends on the expression levels of GrgA, σ28, and σ66, because GrgA has a lower affinity for σ28 than σ66. To date, GrgA remains the only transcription factor that targets nonconserved regions of σ factors (16).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Reagents.
All DNA primers were custom synthesized at Sigma-Aldrich. The QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit and BL21(DE3) ArcticExpress E. coli competent cells were purchased from Agilent Technologies. A Q5 site-directed mutagenesis kit and deoxynucleotides were purchased from New England BioLabs. Isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was purchased from Gold Biotechnologies. Talon metal affinity resin was purchased from TaKaRa. The Strep-Tactin Superflow high-capacity resin and d-desthiobiotin were purchased from IBA Life Sciences. Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 dye, mouse monoclonal antihistidine antibody (H1029), goat anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody (A4416), and EZ-Link sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. SuperSignal West Pico Plus chemiluminescent substrate was purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific. Dip and Read nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) biosensors were purchased from Pall ForteBio. The HNE buffer contained 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 300 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA. The HNEG buffer contained 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 6 M guanidine HCl. The TNE buffer contained 25 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA. The protein storage (PS) buffer contained 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 30% (wt/vol) glycerol. The BLItz buffer contained 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10 mM MgCl2, and 0.1 mM DTT.
Vectors.
Plasmids for expressing His- or Strep-tagged GrgA, σ66, σ28, and their mutants are listed in the Table S1 in the supplemental material. Sequences of primers used for constructing expression plasmids (GrgA deletion mutants, NS-σ28) and a DNA fragment for EMSAs are provided in Table S2. Sequence authenticities of cloned genes and epitope tags in the final vectors were confirmed using Sanger's DNA sequencing service, provided by GenScript Biotech Corporation.
Expression of recombinant proteins and preparation of cell extract for purification.
BL21(DE3) ArcticExpress E. coli cells transformed with a plasmid for expressing an epitope-tagged chlamydial protein (GrgA, σ28, σ66, or their mutant) (Table S1) were cultured in the presence of 1 mM IPTG overnight at 15°C in a shaker. Cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in one of the following buffers: HNE buffer (for purification of native His-tagged proteins), HNEG buffer (for purification of denatured His-tagged proteins), or TNE buffer (for purification of native Strep-tagged proteins). The cells were disrupted using a French press. The cell extract was subjected to high-speed (20,000 × g) centrifugation at 4°C for 30 min. Supernatant was collected and used for protein purification.
Purification of Strep-tagged proteins.
Strep-tagged GrgA and σ factors were purified as previously described (19). The supernatant of centrifuged cell lysate was incubated with the Strep-Tactin Superflow high-capacity resin on a Nutator for 1 h at 4°C. The resin was packed onto a column, washed with 30 column volumes of the TNE buffer, and then eluted with the TNE buffer containing 2.5 mM d-desthiobiotin. The elution was collected in 10 fractions. Protein in the fractions was examined following SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. Fractions with high purity and concentration were pooled and dialyzed overnight against the PS buffer at 4°C and then stored in aliquots at −80°C.
Purification of His-tagged proteins.
The supernatant of centrifuged cell lysate was incubated with the Talon metal affinity resin on a Nutator for 1 h at 4°C. The resin incubated with nondenatured cell extract was packed onto a column, washed with 30 column volumes of HNE buffer containing 1% NP-40, and eluted with the HNE buffer containing 250 mM imidazole. The resin incubated with denatured cell extract was packed onto a column, washed with 30 column volumes of HNEG buffer, and eluted with HNEG buffer containing 250 mM imidazole. Examination of protein purity, dialysis, and storage was carried out in the same manner as that for purified Strep-tagged proteins (18).
In vitro transcription assay.
In vitro transcription of σ28-dependent promoter was performed as previously described (18). The assay, in a total volume of 30 μl, contained 200 ng supercoiled plasmid DNA, 50 mM potassium acetate, 8.1 mM magnesium acetate, 50 mM Tris acetate (pH 8.0), 27 mM ammonium acetate, 1 mM DTT, 3.5% (wt/vol) polyethylene glycol (average molecular weight, 8,000), 330 μM ATP, 330 μM UTP, 1 μM CTP, 0.2 μM [α-32P]CTP (3,000 Ci/mmol), 100 μM 3′-O-methyl-GTP, 20 U of RNasin, RNAP, and the indicated amount of GrgA or GrgA mutant. The reactions using cRNAP and σ28 contained 1.0 μl purified cRNAP and 30 nM His-tagged σ28, purified by procedures involving denaturing and refolding as described above. For reactions using eCore and σ28, their concentrations were 5 nM and 30 nM, respectively. The reaction was allowed to continue at 37°C for 40 min and terminated by the addition of 70 μl of 2.86 M ammonium acetate containing 4 mg of glycogen. After ethanol precipitation, 32P-labeled RNA was resolved by 8 M urea–6% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and quantified with a Storm PhosphorImager and ImageQuant software. Relative amounts of transcripts were presented, with that of the control reaction set as 1 U. Data shown in bar graphs represent averages ± standard deviations (SDs) from three or more independent experiments. Pairwise, two-tailed Student t tests were used to compare data.
EMSA.
GrgA-DNA interaction was determined by EMSA as described previously (18). 32P-labeled DNA fragment containing the C. trachomatis defA promoter (31) was amplified using a 32P-labeled 5′ primer and an unlabeled 3′ primer (Table S2) and purified with a Qiagen column. The GrgA-DNA binding reaction was performed in a total volume of 10 μl, containing 10 nM promoter fragment, the indicated amount of NH-GrgA, 1 mM potassium acetate, 8.1 mM magnesium acetate, 50 mM Tris acetate (pH 8.0), 27 mM ammonium acetate, 1 mM DTT, and 3.5% (wt/vol) polyethylene glycol (average molecular weight, 8,000). After mixing for 1 h at 4°C, the binding mixture was resolved by 6% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel. Free and GrgA-bound DNA fragments were visualized on a Storm PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).
Pulldown assays.
Twenty microliters of Strep-Tactin Superflow high-capacity resin was washed twice with the HNE buffer and incubated with 50 μl of Strep-tagged cell extract or purified protein on a Nutator at 4°C for 1 h. The resin was washed three times with HNE buffer containing 1% NP-40 and then incubated with 5 μg of a purified His-tagged protein (or mutant) on a Nutator at 4°C for 1 h. After 3 washes with the HNE buffer containing 1% NP-40 and a final wash with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the resin was eluted using SDS-PAGE sample buffer. All protein was resolved via SDS-PAGE and detected by either Coomassie blue staining or Western blotting using a monoclonal mouse anti-His or a polyclonal mouse anti-GrgA primary antibody and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody.
Preparation of biotinylated protein.
Purified NH-GrgA was dialyzed against PBS to remove Tris and then incubated with 10 mM EZ-Link sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin for 2 h at 4°C. Excess biotin was removed via two-step dialysis, initially against PBS and subsequently against the PS buffer.
BLI assay.
An NTA His or streptavidin biosensor was subjected to initial hydration in BLItz buffer for 10 min before being loaded onto the ForteBio BLItz machine and washed with BLItz buffer for 30 s to obtain a baseline reading. The His biosensor was then incubated with 4 μl of a His-tagged ligand for 240 s. The concentrations of ligand ranged from 1 to 20 μM, all of which saturated the His-binding sites on the biosensor. Alternatively, the streptavidin biosensor was incubated with 4 μl of a biotinylated ligand (10 μM NH-GrgA, which was sufficient to saturate the binding sites on the biosensor) for 240 s. After a brief wash with BLItz buffer for 30 s to remove excess protein, the biosensor was incubated with 4 μl of an analyte (purified Strep-tagged protein for the His biosensor or NH-σ28 for the streptavidin biosensor) for 120 s to measure association of the ligand-analyte complex. Subsequently, the biosensor was washed with BLItz buffer for 120 s to measure disassociation of the ligand-analyte complex. All BLItz recordings were subsequently fit to a 1:1 binding model using BLItz Pro software (version 1.1.0.31), which generated the association rate constant (ka), disassociation rate constant (kd), and disassociation equilibrium constant (KD) for each interaction.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Ming Tan (University of California Irvine) for pMT1212.
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant no. AI122034 to H.F. and GM118059 to B.E.N.), New Jersey Health Foundation (grant no. PC 20-18 to H.F.), and Natural Sciences Foundation of China (grant no. 31370209 and 31400165 to X.B.).
Footnotes
Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00298-18.
REFERENCES
- 1.Adams DA, Thomas KR, Jajosky RA, Foster L, Sharp P, Onweh DH, Schley AW, Anderson WJ. 2016. Summary of notifiable infectious diseases and conditions—United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 63:1–152. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6354a1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Adams D, Fullerton K, Jajosky R, Sharp P, Onweh D, Schley A, Anderson W, Faulkner A, Kugeler K. 2015. Summary of notifiable infectious diseases and conditions—United States, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62:1–122. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6254a1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.CDC. 2013. Notifiable diseases and mortality tables. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62:424–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fan H. 2012. Blindness-causing trachomatous trichiasis biomarkers sighted. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:2560. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Burton MJ, Mabey DCW. 2009. The global burden of trachoma: a review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3:e460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Belland R, Ojcius DM, Byrne GI. 2004. Chlamydia. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:530–531. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00106-07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hybiske K, Stephens RS. 2007. Mechanisms of Chlamydia trachomatis entry into nonphagocytic cells. Infect Immun 75:3925–3934. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00106-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee JK, Enciso GA, Boassa D, Chander CN, Lou TH, Pairawan SS, Guo MC, Wan FYM, Ellisman MH, Sutterlin C, Tan M. 2018. Replication-dependent size reduction precedes differentiation in Chlamydia trachomatis. Nat Commun 9:45. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02432-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hybiske K, Stephens RS. 2007. Mechanisms of host cell exit by the intracellular bacterium Chlamydia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:11430–11435. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703218104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stephens RS, Kalman S, Lammel C, Fan J, Marathe R, Aravind L, Mitchell W, Olinger L, Tatusov RL, Zhao Q, Koonin EV, Davis RW. 1998. Genome sequence of an obligate intracellular pathogen of humans: Chlamydia trachomatis. Science 282:754–759. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5389.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Belland RJ, Zhong G, Crane DD, Hogan D, Sturdevant D, Sharma J, Beatty WL, Caldwell HD. 2003. Genomic transcriptional profiling of the developmental cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:8478–8483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1331135100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nicholson TL, Olinger L, Chong K, Schoolnik G, Stephens RS. 2003. Global stage-specific gene regulation during the developmental cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Bacteriol 185:3179–3189. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.10.3179-3189.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Albrecht M, Sharma CM, Reinhardt R, Vogel J, Rudel T. 2010. Deep sequencing-based discovery of the Chlamydia trachomatis transcriptome. Nucleic Acids Res 38:868–877. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Omsland A, Sager J, Nair V, Sturdevant DE, Hackstadt T. 2012. Developmental stage-specific metabolic and transcriptional activity of Chlamydia trachomatis in an axenic medium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:19781–19785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212831109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ebright RH. 2000. RNA polymerase: structural similarities between bacterial RNA polymerase and eukaryotic RNA polymerase II. J Mol Biol 304:687–698. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Feklistov A, Sharon BD, Darst SA, Gross CA. 2014. Bacterial sigma factors: a historical, structural, and genomic perspective. Annu Rev Microbiol 68:357–376. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tan M. 2012. Temporal gene regulation during the chlamydial development cycle, p 149–169. In Tan M, Bavoil PM (ed), Intracellular pathogens I: Chlamydiales. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bao X, Nickels BE, Fan H. 2012. Chlamydia trachomatis protein GrgA activates transcription by contacting the nonconserved region of σ66. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:16870–16875. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207300109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schmidt TG, Skerra A. 2007. The Strep-tag system for one-step purification and high-affinity detection or capturing of proteins. Nat Protoc 2:1528–1535. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Abdiche Y, Malashock D, Pinkerton A, Pons J. 2008. Determining kinetics and affinities of protein interactions using a parallel real-time label-free biosensor, the Octet. Anal Biochem 377:209–217. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2008.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yu HH, Tan M. 2003. Sigma28 RNA polymerase regulates hctB, a late developmental gene in Chlamydia. Mol Microbiol 50:577–584. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03708.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moulder JW. 1991. Interaction of chlamydiae and host cells in vitro. Microbiol Rev 55:143–190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Abdelrahman YM, Belland RJ. 2005. The chlamydial developmental cycle. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:949–959. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2005.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Domman D, Horn M. 2015. Following the footsteps of chlamydial gene regulation. Mol Biol Evol 32:3035–3046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fahr MJ, Douglas AL, Xia W, Hatch TP. 1995. Characterization of late gene promoters of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Bacteriol 177:4252–4260. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.15.4252-4260.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wichlan DG, Hatch TP. 1993. Identification of an early-stage gene of Chlamydia psittaci 6BC. J Bacteriol 175:2936–2942. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.10.2936-2942.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Saka HA, Thompson JW, Chen YS, Kumar Y, Dubois LG, Moseley MA, Valdivia RH. 2011. Quantitative proteomics reveals metabolic and pathogenic properties of Chlamydia trachomatis developmental forms. Mol Microbiol 82:1185–1203. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07877.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Skipp PJ, Hughes C, McKenna T, Edwards R, Langridge J, Thomson NR, Clarke IN. 2016. Quantitative proteomics of the infectious and replicative forms of Chlamydia trachomatis. PLoS One 11:e0149011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jewett TJ, Miller NJ, Dooley CA, Hackstadt T. 2010. The conserved Tarp actin binding domain is important for chlamydial invasion. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000997. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rockey DD, Scidmore MA, Bannantine JP, Brown WJ. 2002. Proteins in the chlamydial inclusion membrane. Microbes Infect 4:333–340. doi: 10.1016/S1286-4579(02)01546-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bao X, Pachikara ND, Oey CB, Balakrishnan A, Westblade LF, Tan M, Chase T, Nickels BE, Fan H. 2011. Non-coding nucleotides and amino acids near the active site regulate peptide deformylase expression and inhibitor susceptibility in Chlamydia trachomatis. Microbiology 157:2569–2581. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.049668-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.