Abstract
Background
Oral charcoal adsorbent AST-120 (AST) is reported to ameliorate renal dysfunction by the absorption of toxic substance in the gut. Recent study revealed that, in CKD, gut environment is disturbed including the decrease in tight junctions and Lactobacillus (Lact). In this study, we examined whether AST improves the renal dysfunction through gut environment.
Method
Six-week-old spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were rendered CKD by 5/6th nephrectomy (Nx). SHRs were divided into SHR (Sham), SHR with Nx (Nx), and Nx given AST (Nx + AST) (n = 10, each). After 12 weeks, rats were killed and biochemical parameters were explored. The gut flora was analyzed. Furthermore, gut molecular changes in tight junctions and toll-like receptors were examined. We also investigated the effects of the combination therapy with AST and Lact.
Results
The increase in serum urea nitrogen and urinary protein excretion in Nx was restored in Nx + AST. The increased renal glomerulosclerosis in Nx was ameliorated in Nx + AST. Increases in serum uremic toxins and IL-6 in Nx were ameliorated in Nx + AST. The gut flora analysis revealed that the decrease in Lact in Nx was restored in Nx + AST. The downregulation in the tight junction and TLR2 in Nx was mitigated by AST. However, combination therapy failed to exhibit additional effects.
Conclusion
AST ameliorated renal function with the restoration of Lact and tight junction through TLR pathway, which would mitigate systemic inflammation and contributed to their renoprotective effects. Our study provides a novel mechanism of the renoprotective effects by AST.
Keywords: CKD, Microbiota, Uremic toxin, Tight junction, Toll-like receptor
Introduction
The increase of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients becomes the serious problem for humans because CKD elevates cardiovascular events and causes end-stage kidney disease [1]. Various treatments are used to delay the progression of CKD. However, only these treatments were not sufficient. As one of the pathogenic factors for progression, an unfavorable effect of uremic toxins recently attracts attention. Indoxyl sulfate (IS) and p-cresyl sulfate (PCS) are produced in the intestine by the bacteria from tryptophan or tyrosine, respectively, absorbed from the colon, metabolized into sulfur-conjugated substances, and excreted in the urine from the kidney [2]. Once accumulated by renal impairment, these substances cause the tissue damages through oxidative stress [3, 4]. Another uremic solute, indole acetic acid (IAA) is also shown to damage endothelial cells and increase cardiovascular events in CKD [5]. Charcoal adsorbent AST-120 (AST) is considered to be one of the options to delay the progression of CKD in Asia. It was designed to bind to uremic toxins in the colon and protect against the entry of IS precursors and reduced the plasma IS, thereby slowing the progression of CKD [6, 7]. Although the recent large clinical trial failed renal protective effects [8], several small sized clinical studies have shown its efficacy against the renal impairment [9, 10]. Besides, it was reported that the tight junction in the colon was disrupted in CKD, which was reversed by AST [11]. This effect is supposed to be beneficial to the maintenance of gut barrier function and inhibit the systemic inflammation evoked by the intrusion of various toxins from leaky gut [10]. In this way, the organ interrelationship between gut and kidney has been gaining the scientific interest, coined as ‘the intestinal-renal syndrome’ [12]. The modulation of this relationship can be a plausible strategy against CKD. We previously demonstrated that Lactobacillus (Lact) was decreased in CKD rats and that the supplementation of Lact improved the intestinal barrier, systemic inflammation and the kidney function [13]. However, the effects of AST on microbiota have not been reported thus far.
In this study, we demonstrated that AST elevates the population of Lact in CKD rats, which improved the disruption of intestinal barrier and systemic inflammation through TLR2 and TLR4. The present study provides the novel mechanism of AST through the modulation of gut environment.
Materials and methods
Animal experiments
SHR at 6 weeks of age (Charles river) were rendered CKD by 5/6th nephrectomy as described previously [14]. Rats were housed under controlled environmental conditions (12-h light–dark cycle) and were allowed free access to commercial food diet and water. Rats were randomly assigned to three experimental groups (N = 10 per group): (1) Sham, (2) Nx, (3) Nx + AST. In the second experiment, rats were randomly assigned to five experimental groups (N = 8 per group); (1) Sham, (2) Nx, (3) Nx + AST, (4) Nx + Lact, (5) Nx treated with AST and Lact (Nx + AST + Lact). Lactobacillus acidophilus is kindly provided from Nitto Pharmacy (Kyoto). AST-120 was kindly provided by Kureha Industry Co. (Tokyo). Twelve weeks after nephrectomy, body weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP) measured by tail-cuff method (KN-210, Natsume, Tokyo), and 24-h urinary protein excretion were evaluated. Afterwards, rats were killed and blood samples were collected after the overnight fasting. Plasma levels of blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, IS, PCS and IAA were measured as described previously [15, 16]. Tissue samples of kidney and ascending colon were removed and snap frozen. All experiments were performed in accordance with the animal experiment guideline of Keio University School of Medicine.
Morphological examination
Kidneys were fixed in 10% formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin blocks. To evaluate the glomerular sclerosis and renal fibrosis, PAS-staining and Masson-trichrome staining were performed, respectively. Glomerulosclerosis is evaluated by counting sclerotic glomeruli and evaluated by glomerulosclerotic index [17, 18]. Fibrotic area was evaluated by measuring proportion of fibrotic area from 30 fields using Image-Pro Plus 3.0 (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD).
The analysis of gut bacteria
Fecal samples were suspended in a solution containing 100 mM Tris–HCl (pH9.0) and 40 mM EDTA and were beaten at 5000 rpm for 3 min in the presence of glass beads (BioSpec Products). DNA was extracted using phenol–chloroform extraction, and the supernatant was subjected to isopropanol precipitation. Thereafter, the amplification of the fecal 16S rDNA, the restriction enzyme digestion, the size-fractionation, and the T-RFLP data analysis were conducted as previously reported [19]. PCR was performed as previously reported [13]. The T-RFLP patterns among samples were compared using the calculations of dissimilarity index [20]. The amounts of bacteria in each species in fecal samples were quantified by real-time quantitative PCR using the 7500 Fast Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA) as previously reported [21]. All experiments were performed in duplicate and a melting curve analysis was done after amplification. The amounts of specific bacteria were calculated by the ratio to total bacteria.
Immunoblotting
Ascending colon tissues were lysed and sonicated in lysis buffer and centrifuged at 15,000g for 15 min. Supernatant aliquots were subject to immunoblotting using primary antibody against Occludin, ZO-1, and Claudin-1 (Invitrogen). After blots were incubated with secondary antibody HRP-linked anti-rabbit IgG (GE healthcare, Backhamshire, England), immunoreactive bands were detected using an ECL detection kit (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden).
Real-time polymerase chain reaction
Total RNA was extracted from ascending colon tissues using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Equal amounts (1 µg) of total RNA from each sample were converted to cDNA by PrimeScript RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Otsu, Japan) in a 20-µl reaction volume. Real-time PCR was performed for rat colon tissues, using an ABI Step One Plus sequence detector (PE Applied Biosystems, Tokyo, Japan). Levels of mRNA were normalized to those of β-actin. The primer sequences were shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
TLR2; sense 5′-GTACGCAGTGAGTGGTGCAAGT-3′ |
Antisense 5′-GGCCGCGTCATTGTTCTC-3′ |
TLR4; sense 5′-AATCCCTGCATAGAGGTACTTCC TAAT-3′ |
Antisense 5′-CTCAGATCTAGGTTCTTGGTTGAATAAG-3′ |
GAPDH; sense 5′-GTTACCAGGGCTGCCTCTC-3′ |
Antisense 5′-GGGTTTCCCGTTGATG ACC-3′ |
Results
AST attenuated renal damages in Nx
We investigated the effects of AST on the progression of CKD. Although chow intakes were not different among experimental groups, body weight decreased in Nx as compared with Sham, which were ameliorated in Nx + AST (Sham; 361.1 ± 8.8 g, Nx; 289.3 ± 26.8 g, Nx + AST; 320.0 ± 33.5 g). The increase in SBP in Nx was not ameliorated by AST (Fig. 1a). Although the increase in serum creatinine level in Nx was not altered in Nx + AST (Fig. 1b), the increase in BUN and urinary protein excretion in Nx was ameliorated in Nx + AST (Fig. 1c, d, respectively). Glomerulosclerosis was more evident in Nx as compared to those in sham, which was attenuated by the treatment with AST (Fig. 1e). The fibrotic area evaluated by Masson-trichrome staining was significantly increased in Nx as compared to that in Sham, although AST had no effects (Fig. 1f). These data supported the evidence for the renal protective effect by AST.
AST reduced the serum levels of uremic toxins and inflammatory mediator
Main effects by AST were the absorbance of the uremic toxin precursors in the intestinal lumen and reduction of these plasma levels. Nx showed significant higher levels of serum IS, PCS, and IAA, and these levels were decreased in Nx + AST (Fig. 2a–c, respectively). Consistently, in Nx, fecal concentrations of indole, p-cresol and phenol were increased in Nx and these concentrations significantly elevated in Nx + AST, indicating that AST absorbed these substances in the intestine. Furthermore, the elevation of IL-6 in Nx was improved by AST (Fig. 2g), which implied that AST blocked the entry of bacterial toxins from gut, leading to the amelioration of systemic inflammation in Nx.
AST restored the expressions of barrier molecules in the intestine
The reduction of the serum levels of colon bacteria-derived uremic toxins by AST implied that colon barrier would be improved by AST. The protein expressions of occludin, ZO-1 and claudin-1, key components of intestinal tight junction were all downregulated in Nx, which were mitigated by AST (Fig. 3a). To examine the mechanism to improve the tight junction, we evaluated toll-like receptors: TLR2 and TLR4 which are considered to be activated by intestinal microbiota in the intestine and to regulate the expressions of tight junction proteins [22, 23]. The decrease of TLR2 in Nx is mitigated by AST and the increase of TLR4 in Nx is downregulated by AST (Fig. 3b).
AST restored Lact in Nx
By the absorption of indole produced in the intestine (Fig. 2d), AST also would change the intestinal environment including the population of microbiota. To exclude the possibility that the AST induced the alteration of gut microbiota, we compared gut microbiota from terminal ileum between rats with and without AST treatment by T-RFLP method. The results showed no difference between the two groups. Therefore, AST itself had a little influence on the gut microbiota. Then, we evaluated intestinal microbiota by T-RFLP method among SHR, Nx and Nx + AST (Fig. 4a). Among all kinds of microbiota examined, we found that Lact species was decreased in Nx and the number was increased in Nx + AST. Confirmatory PCR analysis revealed that the changes in number of Lact were consistent with the results of T-RFLP (Fig. 4b, c, left panel). Additionally, Bacteroides (Bact) species was increased in number in Nx, which was decreased by AST (Fig. 4b, right panel). However, confirmatory PCR analysis revealed that increase in Bact number in Nx was not altered in Nx + AST (Fig. 4c, right panel). Other species of microbiota did not exhibit significant changes with the renal damages.
The effects of the combination treatment with AST and Lact on CKD
We previously showed the probiotic effects of Lact in CKD [13]. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the additional effect by Lact to AST treatment. We divided into five experimental groups: (1) Sham, (2) Nx, (3) Nx + AST, (4) Nx + Lact, and (5) Nx + AST + Lact. The population of Lact evaluated with T-RFLP and PCR revealed the increased number in Lact in Nx + AST, Nx + Lact, and Nx + AST + Lact as compared to that in Nx. However, there was no additional increase in Lact in Nx + AST + Lact as compared to those in Nx + AST or Nx + Lact (Fig. 5a). Although chow intakes were not different, body weight was decreased in Nx, which were ameliorated in Nx + AST, Nx + Lact and Nx + AST + Lact (Sham; 359.4 ± 10.1 g, Nx; 288.4 ± 28.0 g, Nx + AST; 327.1 ± 24.4 g, Nx + Lact; 324.1 ± 22.6 g, Nx + AST + Lact; 332.1 ± 23.2 g). SBP were not different among the groups (Fig. 5b). Serum creatinine levels were increased in Nx, which were not altered in Nx + AST, Nx + Lact and Nx + AST + Lact (Fig. 5c). The increase in BUN and in urinary protein excretion in Nx was also ameliorated in Nx + AST, Nx + Lact and Nx + AST + Lact, showing renoprotective effects by Lact or AST (Fig. 5d, e). Serum IS was increased in Nx, which was mitigated in Nx + AST, Nx + Lact and Nx + AST + Lact (Fig. 5f). However, regarding BUN, proteinuria, and IS, we failed to observe additional effects by combination treatments.
Discussion
The present study demonstrated renoprotective effects through gut environment by AST in CKD rats. AST attenuated proteinuria, renal dysfunction, and glomerulosclerosis without affecting SBP.
Our previous paper showed that the renoprotective effects by Lactobacillus improve the decreased tight junction expressions through TLR2 in CKD rats. We explored the mechanisms for these effects by AST and found that AST ameliorated the decreased gut Lactobacillus and the decreased expression of tight junction in Nx through TLR2 and TLR4 pathway which was not observed in the single treatment with Lactobacillus. We also found the reduction of serum uremic toxins, which might contribute to the amelioration of renal damages. These systemic and renal favorable effects by Lactobacillus in combination resulted in the mitigation of renal tissue damages. We also demonstrated that there exist the upper limits of Lactobacillus by the combination experiment with AST and Lactobacillus.
AST is believed to reduce the serum levels of uremic toxins by capturing its precursors in the intestine and blocking the entry of these substances. In the present study, we have shown the increase in fecal excretion of indole, p-cresol, and phenol by AST and the reduction in serum IS, PCS and IAA. In addition, we proposed that the amelioration of intestinal barrier disruption contributed to the blockade of the entry of these toxic molecules. We showed the decrease in the expressions of intestinal tight junction in Nx, which were ameliorated by AST as was already demonstrated previously [11]. One of the important mechanisms for the restoration of tight junctions is the deprivation of uremic toxin such as indole in the intestinal lumen. As we previously reported that in vitro studies, indole downregulates the expressions of tight junctions with a concentration-dependent manner [13]. Recently, some papers focused on the protective effect of indole on the intestinal barrier. The difference among the papers might be caused by the models (the model of colitis or the model or CKD) and the amount of uremic toxins. However, the CKD condition, in which numerous and abundant uremic toxins accumulate in the intestine, at least, provokes the decrease of tight junction by the concentration.
Uremic toxins have been shown to activate aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) [24–28] or pregnane X receptor (PXR) and the activation of PXR by indole derivatives regulated intestinal barrier expression through TLR4 [29]. TLR4 can be activated by circulating LPS derived from bacteria in the intestine [30]. Though LPS in the intestine is not absorbed by AST, the absorption of uremic toxins which reduced the activation of AhR or PXR leads to the decreased expression of TLR4 (Fig. 3b). These effects cumulated in the elevation of the intestinal barrier (Fig. 3a) and the decrease in the systemic inflammation, contributing to the slow progression of CKD.
As another plausible mechanism for the amelioration of intestinal barrier structure, we focused on the changes in microbiota by AST. In uremic conditions, microbes, such as Clostridiaceae, Enterobacteriaceae and Verrucomicrobiacea, which produce indole and p-cresol increased, whereas butyrate-producing microbes including Lact and Prevotellae decreased as compared with those of healthy subjects [31]. Our analysis showed the increase in Bact known as a species of indole producing microbe in Nx. We also demonstrated the restoration of Lact by AST. We previously demonstrated that the administration with Lact also reversed the tight junction disruption through TLR2 pathway in vivo and in vitro studies [13]. The increase of Lact by AST is also related to the upregulation of tight junction through TLR2 pathway since Lact is considered to be one of the key regulators to maintain and form the tight junction protein in the gut.
However, the causes why gut microbiota has changed by the AST treatment are still unknown. Recently, Mishima et al. reported that the ClC-2 chloride channel activator lubiprostone in CKD models mice improves the gut environment [32]. In the paper, they suggested that the retention of uremic toxins, intestinal ischemia, intestinal transit time prolonged by constipation, decreased intestinal fluid secretion, and malnutrition of gut lining with evident atrophy can provoke the shift of gut microbiota. In our case, there are two main causes for the improvement. One cause can be the decrease in the retention of uremic toxins by AST. The other cause can be the improvement from the intestinal ischemia by the improved expression of mucin-2 (the protective layer above the intestinal barrier). As Lactobacillus was shown to adhere to the mucin layer and survive as an intestinal microbiota. Therefore, AST attenuates the gut microbiota including the elevation of Lactobacillus.
Moreover, one of the main mechanisms for the renal protective effects by AST can be its anti-inflammatory effects through the reduction of serum IS. It was reported that Nx exhibited low-grade inflammation, as evidenced by increased level of serum IL-6. These effects might result in the impairment of structure and function of the kidney [33]. It is reported that IS locally induces reactive oxygen species (ROS), which activate the nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kB) pathway and trigger both oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory cytokine production and renal tissue damages [34, 35]. Therefore, reduction of IS by AST teleologically mitigates renal damages. Moreover, we demonstrated the reduction in systemic inflammation by AST treatment. The mitigation of tight junction proteins and the restoration of intestinal barrier function would result in the blockade of LPS entry from the intestine and subdued inflammatory state in CKD.
In the previous report, the supplementation of Lact improved the renal damage and systemic inflammation [13]. The present data showed that AST also restored the renal impairment and systemic circulation of uremic toxins and systemic inflammation. Therefore, we hypothesized that the combination therapy with the Lact and AST could retain the additive effect. However, this therapy failed to show further effects. Of note, the fecal concentration of Lact did not show the significant change between Nx + AST and Nx + AST + Lact though the elevation of Lact concentration in Nx + AST + Lact is predicted. Thus, the population of Lact did not increase even after the addition of Lact orally in Nx + AST. This result indicated the upper limit of Lact residing in the intestinal environment. Similarly, in the previous report, treatment with Lact did not show dose-dependent effects. Petschow et al. demonstrated that although they administered three different concentrations of Lact (108, 109, 1010 cfu/day) the number of fecal Lact did not differ among three groups [36]. Therefore, our data implied that effects by AST including the improvement of the intestinal environment and the alteration of microbiota considered to have the upper limit. This limitation was considered to be defined by the population of Lact. This also suggests that the effects AST are partly dependent on the alteration of microbiome and are not solely dependent on the serum uremic toxin levels. This mechanism would explain why recent large scale clinical trial in EPIC study failed to show the favorable effects on renal function [8], while some small clinical trials in Japan have succeeded [9, 10], since the population of microbiota is to vary among the different races or different food consumptions.
As a limitation, we cannot evaluate all the gut microbiota quantitatively by T-RFLP. Though this method is less difficult and indicates the accurate trends, the resolution is not so high because different DNA fragments sometimes show the same bands because of the restriction enzyme. After T-RFLP methods give us the general trends, confirmatory real-time PCR would be better for more accurate data. Then, this paper mainly focuses on Lactobacillus and Bacteroides, which has some trends with renal function.
In conclusion, AST improved gut environment favorable to Lact which affected the tight junction expressions though TLR pathway with renal protective effects. Our data may help to establish more efficient strategy against CKD with the use of AST in clinical practice.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Scientific Research Fund of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (Grant no. 70573286).
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
Human and Animal rights
Experiments are performed under IRB approval number: 14104-(0).
Informed consent
Not relation because of animal experiments.
References
- 1.United States Renal Data System . 2015 USRDS Annual Data Report. Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vanholder R, Laecke SV, Glorieux G. What is new in uremic toxicity? Pediatr Nephrol. 2008;23(8):1211–1221. doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-0762-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shimizu H, Yisireyili M, Higashiyama Y, Nishijima F, Niwa T. Indoxyl sulfate upregulates renal expression of ICAM-1 via production of ROS and activation of NF-κB and p 53 in proximal tubular cells. Life Sci. 2013;92:143–148. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2012.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vanholder R, Schepers E, Pletinck A, Nagler EV, Glorieux G. The uremic toxicity of indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate: a systematic review. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(9):1897–1907. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013101062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dou L, Sallee M, Cerini C, Poitevin S, Gondouin B, Jourde-Chiche N, Fallague K, Brunet P, Calaf R, Dussol B, Mallet B, Dignat-George F, Burtey S. The cardiovascular effect of the uremic solute indole-3 acetic acid. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:876–887. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013121283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Niwa T, Emoto Y, Maeda K, Uehara T, Yamada N, Shibata M. Oral sorbent suppresses accumulation of albumin-bound indoxyl sulphate in serum of haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 1991;6:105–109. doi: 10.1093/ndt/6.2.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Taki K, Niwa T. Indoxyl sulfate-lowering capacity of oral sorbents affects prognosis of kidney function and oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease. J Ren Nutr. 2007;17:48–52. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2006.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schulman G, Berl T, Beck GJ, Remuzzi G, Ritz E, Arita K, Kato A, Shimizu M. Randomized placebo-controlled EPPIC trials of AST-120 in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:1732–1746. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014010042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Akizawa T, Asano Y, Morita S, Wakita T, Onishi Y, Fukuhara S, Gejyo F, Matsuo S, Yorioka N, Kurokawa K, CAP-KD Study Group Effect of a carbonaceous oral adsorbent on the progression of CKD: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;54(3):459–467. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schulman G, Vanholder R, Niwa T. AST-120 for the management of progression of chronic kidney disease. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2014;7:49–56. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S41339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vaziri ND, Yuan J, Khazaeli M, Masuda Y, Ichii H, Liu S. Oral activated charcoal adsorbent (AST-120) ameliorates chronic kidney disease-induced intestinal epithelial barrier disruption. Am J Nephrol. 2013;37:518–525. doi: 10.1159/000351171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ritz E. Intestinal-renal syndrome: mirage or reality? Blood Purif. 2011;31(1–3):70–76. doi: 10.1159/000321848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yoshifuji A, Wakino S, Irie J, Tajima T, Hasegawa K, Kanda T, Tokuyama H, Hayashi K, Itoh H. Gut Lactobacillus protects against the progression of renal damage by modulating the gut environment in rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31:401–412. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sugano N, Wakino S, Kanda T, Tatematsu S, Homma K, Yoshioka K, Hasegawa K, Hara Y, Suetsugu Y, Yoshizawa T, Hara Y, Utsunomiya Y, Tokudome G, Hosoya T, Saruta T, Hayashi K. T-type calcium channel blockade as a therapeutic strategy against renal injury in rats with subtotal nephrectomy. Kidney Int. 2008;73(7):826–834. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Saito S, Shimizu H, Yisireyili M, Nishijima F, Enomoto A, Niwa T. Indoxyl sulfate-induced activation of (pro)renin receptor is involved in expression of TGF-β1 and α-smooth muscle actin in proximal tubular cells. Endocrinology. 2014;155(5):1899–1907. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Itoh Y, Ezawa A, Kikuchi K, Tsuruta Y, Niwa T. Protein-bound uremic toxins in hemodialysis patients measured by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry and their effects on endothelial ROS production. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;403(7):1841–1850. doi: 10.1007/s00216-012-5929-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wu L, Cox A, Roe C, Dziadek M, Cooper ME, Gilbert RE. Transforming growth factor β1 and renal injury following subtotal nephrectomy in the rat: role of the renin-angiotensin system. Kidney Int. 1997;51:1553–1567. doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kelly DJ, Zhang Y, Gow R, Gilbert RE. Tranilast attenuates structural and functional aspects of renal injury in the remnant kidney model. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(10):2619–2629. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000139066.77892.04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nagashima K, Hisada T, Sato M, Mochizuki J. Application of new primer-enzyme combinations to terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism profiling of bacterial populations in human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:1251–1262. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.2.1251-1262.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hiraishi A, Iwasaki M, Shinjo H. Terminal restriction pattern analysis of 16S rRNA genes for the characterization of bacterial communities of activated sludge. J Biosci Bioeng. 2000;90:148–156. doi: 10.1016/S1389-1723(00)80102-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Larsen N, Vogensen FK, van den Berg FW, Nielsen DS, Andreasen AS, Pedersen BK, Al-Soud WA, Sørensen SJ, Hansen LH, Jakobsen M. Gut microbiota in human adults with type 2 diabetes differs from non-diabetic adults. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Karczewski J, Troost FJ, Konings I, Dekker J, Kleerebezem M, Brummer RJM, Wells JM. Regulation of human epithelial tight junction proteins by Lactobacillus plantarum in vivo and protective effects on the epithelial barrier. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010;298:851–859. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00327.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang Y, Devkota S, Musch MW, Jabri B, Nagler C, Antonopoulos DA, Chervonsky A, Chang EB. Regional mucosa-associated microbiota determine physiological expression of TLR2 and TLR4 in murine colon. PLoS One. 2010;5(10):e13607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bansal T, Alaniz RC, Wood TK, Jayaraman A. The bacterial signal indole increases epithelial-cell tight-junction resistance and attenuates indicators of inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:228–233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906112107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shimada Y, Kinoshita M, Harada K, Mizutani M, Masahata K, Kayama H, Takeda K. Commensal bacteria-dependent indole production enhances epithelial barrier function in the colon. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schiering C, Wincent E, Metidji A, Iseppon A, Li Y, Potocnik AJ, Omenetti S, Henderson CJ, Wolf CR, Nebert DW, Stockinger B. Feedback control of AHR signalling regulates intestinal immunity. Nature. 2017;542:242–245. doi: 10.1038/nature21080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schroeder JC, Dinatale BC, Murray IA, Flaveny CA, Liu Q, Laurenzana EM, Lin JM, Strom SC, Omiecinski CJ, Amin S, Perdew GH. The uremic toxin 3-indoxyl sulfate is a potent endogenous agonist for the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Biochemist. 2010;49(2):393–400. doi: 10.1021/bi901786x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Heath-Pagliuso S, Rogers WJ, Tullis K, Seidel SD, Cenijn PH, Brouwer A, Denison MS. Activation of the Ah receptor by tryptophan and tryptophan metabolites. Biochemist. 1998;37(33):11508–11515. doi: 10.1021/bi980087p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Venkatesh M, Mukherjee S, Wang H, Li H, Sun K, Benechet AP, Qiu Z, Maher L, Redinbo MR, Phillips RS, Fleet JC, Kortagere S, Mukherjee P, Fasano A, Le Ven J, Nicholson JK, Dumas ME, Khanna KM, Mani S. Symbiotic bacterial metabolites regulate gastrointestinal barrier function via the xenobiotic sensor PXR and toll-like receptor 4. Immunity. 2014;41(2):296–310. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jin C, Henao-Mejia J, Flavell RA. Innate immune receptors: key regulators of metabolic disease progression. Cell Metab. 2013;17(6):873–882. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wong J, Peceno YM, De Santis TZ, Pahl M, Andersen GL, Vaziri ND. Expansion of urease and uricase-containing, indole- and p-cresol-forming and contraction of short chain fatty acid-producing intestinal bacteria in ESRD. Am J Nephrol. 2014;39:230–237. doi: 10.1159/000360010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mishima E, Fukuda S, Shima H, Hirayama A, Akiyama Y, Takeuchi Y, Fukuda NN, Suzuki T, Suzuki C, Yuri A, Kikuchi K, Tomioka Y, Ito S, Soga T, Abe T. Alteration of the intestinal environment by lubiprostone is associated with amelioration of adenine-induced CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:1787–1794. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014060530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kondo M, Tahara A, Hayashi K, Abe M, Inami H, Ishikawa T, Ito H, Tomura Y. Renoprotective effects of novel interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 inhibitor AS2444697 through anti-inflammatory action in 5/6 nephrectomized rats. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2014;387(10):909–919. doi: 10.1007/s00210-014-1023-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shimizu H, Bolati D, Adijiang A, Muteliefu G, Enomoto A, Nishijima F, Dateki M, Niwa T. NF-kappaB plays an important role in indoxyl sulfate-induced cellular senescence, fibrotic gene expression, and inhibition of proliferation in proximal tubular cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2011;301:1201–1212. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00471.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yisireyili M, Shimizu H, Saito S, Enomoto A, Nishijima F, Niwa T. Indoxyl sulfate promotes cardiac fibrosis with enhanced oxidative stress in hypertensive rats. Life Sci. 2013;92:1180–1185. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2013.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Petschow BW, Figueroa R, Harris CL, Beck LB, Ziegler E, Goldin B. Effects of feeding an infant formula containing Lactobacillus GG on the colonization of intestine. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39(9):786–790. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000177245.53753.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]