Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 12;26(1):31–42. doi: 10.1007/s40199-018-0211-7

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Gap widths of scratch of different concentrations of F9 (a) and PEN (b) were analyzed with ImageJ software in comparison of untreated cells as the control and cells with FBS 10% as the positive control. (***) significantly reduced the gap width compared to the control group (p < 0.05). c Comparison of wound healing effect of F9, PEN, control and positive control, using scratch assay on human dermal fibroblast (HDF)