Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Sep 24;8:14305. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32675-w

Detection and characterization of bacterial nucleic acids in culture-negative synovial tissue and fluid samples from rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis patients

Yan Zhao 1,2,#, Bin Chen 1,#, Shufeng Li 3, Lanxiu Yang 4, Dequan Zhu 5, Ye Wang 6, Haiying Wang 1, Tao Wang 2, Bin Shi 2, Zhongtao Gai 7, Jun Yang 10, Xueyuan Heng 5,✉, Junjie Yang 1,8,✉, Lei Zhang 1,5,6,7,9,10,✉
PMCID: PMC6155189  PMID: 30250232

Abstract

Human intestinal microbes can mediate development of arthritis – Studies indicate that certain bacterial nucleic acids may exist in synovial fluid (SF) and could be involved in arthritis, although the underlying mechanism remains unclear. To characterize potential SF bacterial nucleic acids, we used 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to assess bacterial nucleic acid communities in 15 synovial tissue (ST) and 110 SF samples from 125 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 16 ST and 42 SF samples from 58 patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Our results showed an abundant diversity of bacterial nucleic acids in these clinical samples, including presence of Porphyromonas and Bacteroides in all 183 samples. Agrobacterium, Comamonas, Kocuria, Meiothermus, and Rhodoplanes were more abundant in synovial tissues of rheumatoid arthritis (STRA). Atopobium, Phascolarctobacterium, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, Bacteroides uniformis, Rothia, Megasphaera, Turicibacter, Leptotrichia, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Bacteroides fragilis, Porphyromonas, and Streptococcus were more abundant in synovial tissues of osteoarthritis (STOA). Veillonella dispar, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Prevotella copri and Treponema amylovorum were more abundant in synovial fluid of rheumatoid arthritis (SFRA), while Bacteroides caccae was more abundant in the synovial fluid of osteoarthritis (SFOA). Overall, this study confirms existence of bacterial nucleic acids in SF and ST samples of RA and OA lesions and reveals potential correlations with degree of disease.

Introduction

RA is a synovitis-based systemic autoimmune disease whose etiology remains elusive although both genetic and environmental factors play an important role in disease pathogenesis1,2. The pathogenesis of OA is also unclear, although various parameters, including age, infection, inflammation, injury, extra-articular deformity, joint instability, environmental factors, estrogen, excess weight, excessive exercises, genetics, and diet may be risk factors3,4. Although infection has not been considered a major factor in the pathogenesis of RA and OA, discovery of inflammatory cytokines and the currently unsatisfactory therapeutic options have led us to rethink the role of bacterial infection in the development and pathogenesis of RA and OA.

Recent data indicate a role for human microbiota in the pathology of inflammatory arthritis, as mucosa exposed to high loads of bacterial antigens (such as in intestines) may break through the first immune resistance of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and related diseases. For example, Wu et al. found that sterile conditions significantly abate spontaneous arthritis in K/BxN mice5. Further, injection of filamentous bacteria induces murine autoimmune responses and affects the role of T17 cells, with bacteria influencing IL17 secretion and increasing production of antibodies, thus resulting in arthritis. In a specific pathogen-free environment, administration of E. coli DH5a enemas to Kunming mice directly induces arthritic symptoms, with joints showing invasion of inflammatory cells6.

In humans, Scher et al. used 16S rRNA gene sequencing of stool samples from 44 RA patients to show that Prevotellacopri, a human intestinal bacterium, may mediate development of RA7,8. Further, Zhang et al. used shotgun metagenomic sequencing of saliva, dental plaque and fecal samples to show that RA patients lack Haemophilus species, and that their abundance is inversely proportional to RA autoimmune antibody titers9. However, Lactobacillus salivarius is significantly enriched in dental plaque, saliva, and fecal samples of RA patients, especially those with highly active disease.

Work by Cukrowska et al. indicates that intestinal microbiota do not induce immune responses under a balanced state10. Instead, as a result of dysregulation of intestinal microbiota, normal microbiota can act as an external antigen to stimulate lymphocyte proliferation and differentiation. Activated lymphocytes can then release various cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-6, IL-17, and TNF-α. IL-1 and TNF-α prompt white blood cells to accumulate in the articular cavity and stimulate production of small molecule inflammatory mediators, thereby leading to cartilage damage and changes in bone.

Early studies found that Clostridium perfringens is significantly more abundant in the feces of RA patients than control samples and is associated with the degree of RA activity11. Further, a DNA-RNA hybrid comparative study of fecal samples from early RA patients (≤6 months) and fibromyalgia patients found that RA patients have significantly decreased abundance of fecal Bifidobacteria, Bacteroides, fragile Bacillus subtilis, Mycobacterium faecalis, Clostridium difficile, and other species, compared to controls12.

Most RA studies have analyzed fecal samples to show that dysregulation of intestinal microbiota is involved in RA pathogenesis, although few studies have examined the intestinal microbiota of OA patients. Bacterial peptidoglycans can be detected in joint samples from OA patients13, and peptidoglycan, combined with autoantibodies, can activate extra-articular reactive B cells14. In addition, mycoplasma may also contribute to the development of chronic inflammation in arthritis. PCR analysis of 16S rRNA from arthritis patients identified Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the synovial fluid of 19/24 RA patients (79%) and 8/10 OA patients (80%), but not in control samples from trauma patients15.

To date, no literature has analyzed potential intra-articular bacterial nucleic acids from in situ lesions using high-throughput techniques or has evaluated involvement of bacterial nucleic acids in RA and OA lesions from the perspective of bacterial infection. Therefore, we collected 31 ST (15 STRA and 16 STOA) samples and 152 SF (110 SFRA and 42 SFOA) samples and used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to evaluate the in situ existence of microbiota in lesions and their potential involvement in the development and progression of arthritis.

Results

Detection of bacterial nucleic acids and characterization of microbiota in RA and OA synovial samples

Figure 1A displays all samples with V1-V2 sequencing using 16S rRNA, with operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on 97% sequence similarity. We obtained 290 ± 116 OTUs per sample. Alpha rarefaction plots of observed species were constructed to determine that adequate sequence coverage was obtained to reliably describe the full diversity present in these samples.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Rarefaction analysis of the microbe species from synovial tissue and synovial fluid of Rheumatoid arthritis or Osteoarthritis. (A) Rarefaction curve; (B) Shannon index. STOA = synovial tissue from osteoarthritis, STRA = synovial tissue from rheumatoid arthritis, SFOA = synovial fluid from osteoarthritis, SFRA = synovial fluid from rheumatoid arthritis.

The Shannon index was used to assess and compare α-diversity of samples of SFOA, STOA, SFRA, and STRA. The data in Fig. 1B illustrates that the α-diversity of STOA was significantly higher than that of STRA samples (P = 0.00399 STOA vs STRA), and the α-diversity of SFRA was significantly higher than that of SFOA samples (P = 0.03704 SFRA vs SFOA). In addition, the α-diversity of SFRA was significantly higher than that of STRA samples (P = 2.085e-06 SFRA vs STRA). Although α-diversity of SFOA was higher than that of STOA samples, the difference was not significant (P = 0.1689 SFOA vs STOA).

For compositional changes in microbiota, we performed principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of unweighted and weighted UniFrac distances on all samples. Figure 2A displays unweighted UniFrac of synovial tissue samples, which indicates significant aggregations in STRA and STOA samples (P = 0.0001, r = 0.287, ANOSIM). Figure 2B displays weighted UniFrac of synovial tissue samples, which indicate significant aggregations in STRA and STOA samples (P = 0.04, r = 0.1226, ANOSIM). However, as shown in Fig. 2C and D, unweighted (P = 0.30, r = 0.0205, ANOSIM) UniFrac of synovial fluid samples showed no significant aggregations in SFRA and SFOA samples, but weighted (P = 0.0013, r = 0.1605, ANOSIM) UniFrac PCoA showed significant aggregations in SFRA and SFOA. At the same time, as shown in Fig. 2E and F, unweighted (P = 0.0001, r = 0.5882, ANOSIM) UniFrac of RA samples showed significant aggregations in STRA and SFRA samples, while analysis of OA samples showed significant aggregations in STOA and SFOA samples as well (P = 0.0001, r = 0.661, ANOSIM).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of unweighted and weighted UniFrac distances of all samples. (A) PCoA unweighted UniFrac PC1 vs PC2, STOA = synovial tissue from osteoarthritis, STRA = synovial tissue from rheumatoid arthritis. (B) PCoA weighted UniFrac PC3 vs PC2, STOA = synovial tissue from osteoarthritis, STRA = synovial tissue from rheumatoid arthritis. (C) PCoA unweighted UniFrac PC1 vs PC2, SFOA = synovial fluid from osteoarthritis, SFRA = synovial fluid from rheumatoid arthritis. (D) PCoA weighted UniFrac PC1 vs PC2, SFOA = synovial fluid from osteoarthritis, SFRA = synovial fluid from rheumatoid arthritis. (E) PCoA unweighted UniFrac PC1 vs PC2, SFRA = synovial fluid from rheumatoid arthritis, STRA = synovial tissue from rheumatoid arthritis. (F) PCoA weighted UniFrac PC1 vs PC2, SFOA = synovial fluid from osteoarthritis, STOA = synovial tissue from osteoarthritis.

Comparison of bacterial community composition in RA and OA synovial samples

Phylum-based microbial components of RA and OA were similar, with differences in the ratio of certain types of bacteria. As shown in Fig. 3, the most abundant phyla in all synovial samples were Proteobacteria (STRA, 69.0%; STOA, 55.1%; SFRA, 24.9%; SFOA, 39.1%), Bacteroidetes (STRA, 15.6%; STOA, 20.4%; SFRA, 37.4%; SFOA, 29.4%), and Firmicutes (STRA, 11.3%; STOA, 17.0%; SFRA, 29.4%; SFOA, 24.0%).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Microflora distributions of the microbe species from synovial tissue and synovial fluid of Rheumatoid arthritis or Osteoarthritis in the phylum level. STRA = synovial tissue from rheumatoid arthritis. STOA = synovial tissue from osteoarthritis, SFRA= synovial fluid from rheumatoid arthritis. SFOA = synovial fluid from osteoarthritis.

We compared OTUs in ST samples and found that the frequencies of 95 OTUs were >0.5, as shown in Fig. 4A. There are species in all ST samples (15 OTUs), including Enterobacteriaceae, Streptococcus, Alcaligenaceae, Bacteroides, Haemophilus, Herbaspirillum, Porphyromonas, Acinetobacter johnsonii, Prevotella melaninogenica, and Veillonella dispar. The results are displayed in Fig. 4B. As shown in Fig. 4C, the frequencies of 150 OTUs in SF were >0.5. There are species in all SF samples (2 OTUs), including Porphyromonas and Bacteroides. The results are displayed in Fig. 4D. Porphyromonas and Bacteroides were present in all ST samples and SF samples.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

OTU analysis of all synovial samples. (A) OTU frequency histogram for all synovial tissue samples. (B) Pie chart of shared OTUs in all synovial tissue samples. (C) OTU frequency histogram for all synovial fluid samples. (D) Pie chart of shared OTUs in all synovial fluid samples.

LEfSe (Linear discriminant analysis effect size) was performed to further explore microbial differences in ST and SF of RA and OA patients. In LEfSe, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was adopted to evaluate the data and effects on significantly different species. LEfSe identified 48 characteristic features (LDA score > 2; α < 0.05) that significantly differed in relative abundance between STOA and STRA. Agrobacterium, Comamonas, Kocuria, Meiothermus, and Rhodoplanes were concentrated in STRA; and Atopobium, Phascolarctobacterium, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, Bacteroides uniformis, Rothia, Megasphaera, Turicibacter, Leptotrichia, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Bacteroides fragilis, Porphyromonas, and Streptococcus were concentrated in STOA. The results are displayed in Fig. 5A. Further, we identified 27 characteristic features (LDA score > 2; α < 0.05) that significantly differed in relative abundance between SFOA and SFRA. Veillonella dispar, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Prevotella copri, and Treponema amylovorum were concentrated in SFRA, while Bacteroides caccae was more abundant in SFOA. The results are displayed in Fig. 5B.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Histogram of linear discriminant analysis (LDA) scores for microbes differentially abundant in Rheumatoid arthritis or Osteoarthritis. (A) Histogram plot of LDA scores for microbes in STOA compared to STRA groups. (B) Histogram plot of LDA scores for microbes in SFOA compared to SFRA groups. RA-enriched microbes are indicated with a positive LDA score, while OA-enriched microbes are indicated with a negative score. LDA score indicates the effect size and ranking of each differentially abundant taxon. STRA = synovial tissue from rheumatoid arthritis. STOA = synovial tissue from osteoarthritis, SFRA = synovial fluid from rheumatoid arthritis. SFOA = synovial fluid from osteoarthritis.

PICRUSt algorithm prediction of potential microbiota functions

PICRUSt (Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States) algorithm was adopted to predict microbiota functions. Among the 277 tested Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways, 11 pathways differed between SFRA and SFOA (LDA > 2), and 55 pathways differed between STRA and the STOA (LDA > 2), including pathways related to metabolism, genetic information processing, environmental information processing, cellular processes, and body systems. The results are displayed in Fig. 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Hierarchically clustered heatmap analysis of KEGG pathways in synovial tissue and synovial fluid of Rheumatoid arthritis or Osteoarthritis. The relative values for bacteria are indicated by color intensity with the legend indicated at the top-left corner of the figure. KEGG = Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. STRA = synovial tissue from rheumatoid arthritis. STOA = synovial tissue from osteoarthritis, SFRA = synovial fluid from rheumatoid arthritis. SFOA = synovial fluid from osteoarthritis.

We also evaluated the relationship between genus and relevant metabolic pathways for SFRA and SFOA and for STRA and STOA groups. Microbial genera of the SFOA group and pathways related to processing of genetic information (folding, sorting and degradation, repair and replication, translation, and transcription) were negatively correlated with metabolism-related pathways (metabolism of amino acids, carbohydrates, energy, coenzyme factors and vitamins, terpenoids and ketones, and nucleotides), while genera of the SFRA group had a positive correlation. However, genera of the SFOA group were positively correlated, while those of the SFRA group were negatively correlated, with transcription factors. Microbial genera of the STOA group and pathways related to processing of genetic information (folding, sorting and degradation, repair and replication, translation, and transcription) were positively correlated with metabolic-related pathways (metabolism of amino acids, carbohydrates, energy, coenzyme factor and vitamin, terpenoids and ketones, and nucleotides), cytoskeletal proteins, and drug metabolism-related enzymes, while genera of the STRA group had a negative correlation. However, genera of the STOA group were negatively correlated, while genera of the STRA group was positively correlated, with degradation and metabolism-related pathways of foreign matters, phenylalanine metabolism, dicarboxylic acid metabolism, unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis, and protein kinase.

Correlation between cytokine expression and microbiota functions in RA

We measured expression of five inflammatory factors – IL-1α, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-17 – in blood samples of 58 RA patients and analyzed their correlations with microbiota functional analysis results from synovial fluid of these RA patients. Primary immune defects and cell proliferation were positively correlated with IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α expression. Fcγ receptor-mediated phagocytosis and endocytosis and the GnRH signaling pathway were negatively correlated with IL-17, IL-1α, and IL-6 expression. Bile secretion, flavonoid biosynthesis, and amino acid metabolism were negatively correlated with IL-1α, IL-1β, and TNF-α expression. The results are displayed in Fig. 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Heatmap showing correlations between cytokines and functions of microbiota in RA. Red arrows represent positive correlations, and blue arrows represent negative correlations.

RA and OA-associated microbiota in all synovial samples

Relative abundance of microbiota was calculated by summing the abundance of data. P-values were tested by Wilcoxon rank sum test and corrected for multiple testing16. It is worth mentioning that 76 microbiotas were differentially enriched in RA and OA samples. The results are displayed in Fig. 8A. Genera such as Fusobacterium were overrepresented in SFRA samples. Using a machine learning approach, samples were mostly successfully classified into RA and OA groups, with the highest proportion of samples correctly classified when using OTU-level taxa along with data from RA and OA markers. With OTU-level markers of RA and OA, receiver operating curves predicted risk of arthritis. STRA samples were classified correctly and separately from STOA samples with a success rate of 1. The results are displayed in Fig. 8B. SFRA samples were classified correctly and separately from SFOA samples with a success rate of 0.86. The results are displayed in Fig. 8C.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Microbiota associated with Rheumatoid arthritis and Osteoarthritis. (A) Relative abundance of the top 76 most different OTUs across taxonomic groups (P < 0.1, by Wilcoxon rank sum test). Abundance profiles were transformed into Z-scores by subtracting the average abundance and dividing the standard deviation of all samples. Z score was negative (shown in blue) when the row abundance was lower than the mean. *P < 0.01; **P < 0.05. (B) Receiver operating characteristic curves for STRA and STOA groups, determined using OTU markers, sequencing datasets, and a supervised learning approach with random Forest algorithm. (C) Receiver operating characteristic curves for SFRA and SFOA groups, determined using OTU markers, sequencing datasets, and a supervised learning approach with random Forest algorithm.

Discussion

Microbiomes are increasingly associated with the pathogenesis of RA, although most studies have focused on fecal and oral saliva samples9–11, whereas microenvironments in the articular cavity and lesions have not been systematically studied. On the other hand, OA appears to have a different etiology. Nonetheless, several phenomena in the OA acute phase response demonstrate the inflammatory properties of the disease and implicate various cytokines and chemokines in its pathogenesis17–21. However, whether infection is involved in OA pathogenesis remains controversial.

We assessed the bacterial nucleic acid in SF and ST of RA and OA patients with 16s rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. We found that the bacterial nucleic acid is different between RA and OA not only in SF but also in ST. Most importantly, we separately compared the profiles of bacterial nucleic acid between RA and OA in ST and SF, we then identified characteristic nucleic acid biomarkers in RA and OA.

Previous studies in SF and ST used traditional 16s rRNA gene PCR. Heijedn et al. used 16S-rRNA primers to detect the presence of bacterial DNA in RA (n=26), OA (n=5) and other form of arthritis samples13. DNA amplicons were also detected in the SF and/or ST samples from 5 patients with RA (5/26, 19.2%); these originated from multiple bacterial species. Martinez-Martinez et al., used Universal 16S-ribosomal RNA primers to detect the presence of bacterial DNA in SF and ST of patients with RA and other arthritis, and they used immunobiological analysis with a specific antibody to detect the presence of bacterial peptidoglycan–polysaccharide complexes in synovial tissue. Here, we aseptically collected ST and SF samples from patients with RA (n=125) and OA (n=58) and used 16S rRNA V1-V2 sequencing to analyze microbiome profiles. We found that both ST and SF possess microbial DNA amplicons belonging to various microflora, confirming that bacterial nucleic acids are present in the articular cavity of RA and OA. Compared with previous studies, we used a relatively larger cohort, and more importantly, our work is the first study on ST and SF in RA and OA patients using next-generation sequencing. The findings have been comprehensively validated, and significant variations in the diversity and relative abundance between RA and OA were further discovered. A limitation of this study is that we only confirm what bacterial nucleic acids exist in ST and SF, but we cannot prove there were bacteria in ST or SF. Future studies are required to directly confirm the same, using other methods.

A pathological feature of RA is synovial cell proliferation, which produces various cytokines. This inflammatory reaction results in synovial tissue hyperplasia, thus initiating a cycle that increases production of synovial fluid22–25. SF concentrates blood and ST components26, so we found significantly greater α-diversity in SFRA than STRA samples (P = 2.085e-06). In the pathology of OA, however, articular cartilage releases debris into the SF after destruction of pathogenic factors, stimulating synovitis. Synovitis releases inflammatory mediators, further degrading the cartilage and initiating a destructive cycle, while the amount of synovial fluid does not change significantly27. Therefore, STOA is not significantly affected by synovial erosion, and the α-analysis showed no significant difference between SFOA and STOA (P = 0.1689). These differences between RA and OA agree with existing literature, because although both lesion sites are ST, they are based on different pathological features28,29. Accordingly, we detected significantly different bacterial nucleic acids for STRA and STOA, with noteworthy aggregation (P = 0.00399).

A common pathological feature of RA and OA is synovial inflammatory response30. In early arthritis, it is difficult to clinically distinguish between RA and OA using imaging and histopathological methods31,32. Therefore DNA fragments of bacteria that assemble in the SF offer a distinguishing feature between STOA and STRA. Similar to intestinal bacteria, perhaps it is not complete change in flora that cause disease, but changes in the proportion of certain microbiota. Our results show no obvious aggregation in SFRA and SFOA samples (P = 0.03704). Further, our OTU data show that Porphyromonas and Bacteroides were present in all samples, and previous studies have found Porphyromonas in SF and serum of individuals with RA and in epithelial ulcer tissues of individuals with periodontitis33,34.

Taneja et al. showed that HLA expression affects intestinal flora and increases susceptibility of arthritis, suggesting that intestinal microbes can be used as biomarkers for RA research33. Our analysis of flora differences revealed that Agrobacterium, Comamonas, Kocuria, Meiothermus, and Rhodoplanes were concentrated in STRA samples, while Atopobium, Phascolarctobacterium, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, Bacteroides uniformis, Rothia, Megasphaera, Turicibacter, Leptotrichia, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Bacteroides fragilis, Porphyromonas, and Streptococcus were concentrated in STOA samples. Among them, Haemophilus parainfluenzae9 and Porphyromonas35,36 have been previously shown to be present in oral and gut microbiomes of individuals with arthritis.

Analysis of flora differences between SFRA and SFOA samples revealed that Veillonella dispar, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Prevotella copri, Fusobacterium, and Treponema amylovorum are more abundant in SFRA samples, while Bacteroides caccae is concentrated in SFOA samples. Among them, Haemophilus parainfluenzae9, Prevotella copri8,33,37 and Bacteroides caccae33,35–37 have been previously shown to be present in feces of mouse models for arthritis. Our results show that these bacterial DNA are also present in ST or SF. Therefore, intestinal bacteria or oral bacteria may enter and settle into joint cavities through certain pathways and then become involved in the occurrence and development of arthritis.

Using function-module analysis with the KEGG database, we found consistent microbial flora function of ST and SF. Pathways related to metabolism (including amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, energy metabolism, co-enzyme factor and vitamin metabolism, metabolism of terpenoids and ketones, and nucleotide metabolism) were positively correlated with microbiota function in the RA articular cavity, but negatively correlated with that in the OA articular cavity. Pathways and transcription factors related to genetic information processing were positively correlated with microbiota function in the OA articular cavity, but negatively correlated with that in the RA articular cavity. Therefore, some flora differences may play an important role in the pathophysiological mechanisms of RA or OA and may perhaps be directly involved in disease occurrence.

Clinical manifestations of RA include chronic synovitis and hyperplasia and fibrosis of synovial membranes38. In the interaction network of RA, inflammatory localized cytokines, IL-1 and TNF are located in the central area39,40. Subsequently, IL-6 and IL-7 are also involved in proliferation of synovial cells and induce production of matrix metalloproteinases, thereby aggravating destruction of articular cartilage41,42. In this study, we analyzed five inflammatory factors – IL-1α, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-17 – in blood samples from 58 RA patients. At the same time, we functionally analyzed microbiota using 16S rRNA sequencing of the synovial fluid from these RA patients. Our results demonstrate primary immunologic deficiency and indicate that synovial cell proliferation – both pathological features of RA22–25 – are positively correlated with IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α expression. Our results also indicate that phagocytosis mediated by the Fcγ receptor – which plays a crucial role in RA pathogenesis43–45 – and the GnRH signaling pathway, are negatively correlated with IL-17, IL-1α, and IL-6 expression. Again, this indicates that the function of microbiota produced in synovial fluid affects inflammatory factors, although specific effects require further verification.

Further, Fusobacterium is one of the most common genera in human infections and can be found in body cavities of humans and other animals. Fusobacterium nucleatum has been reported in high numbers and frequency in patients with periodontitis46. Some reports have indicated that an infectious agent in a susceptible host could be one possible trigger factor for RA. It has been suggested that oral microorganisms and special periodontal bacteria (mainly Porphyromonas gingivalis), could be infectious agents47. Martinez-Martinez et al., found that 100% of patients showed periodontal bacterial DNA (PBDNA) in subgingival dental plaque (SDP) and synovial fluid (SF) and 83.5% in serum. Prevotella intermedia (89.4% and 73.6%) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (57.8% and 42.1%) were the species most frequently detected in SDP and SF, respectively34. Our results show that Porphyromonas exist in all SF samples (SFRA and SFOA) and Fusobacterium are overrepresented in SFRA samples. These results confirm that oral microorganisms may contribute to RA.

Conclusions

The present research on microbial flora provides an excellent entry point to study various diseases. However, there is insufficient research on microbes related to the pathogenesis of RA and OA, impeding exploration of more effective and specific treatment methods. In this study, starting with synovial samples from arthritis lesions, we confirmed the presence of microbes in synovial tissue and synovial fluid and showed some microbial differences, which may be involved in the occurrence and development of RA and OA. With continuous development of molecular biology techniques, relationships of microorganisms with OA or RA can be better understood to provide a broader prospect for treatment of OA and RA. In addition, there are ongoing studies to further observe how microbes in synovial tissue and synovial fluid settle in joint cavities and accelerate the pathology of arthritis.

Methods

Ethics statement

This protocol was evaluated and approved by the Ethics Committee of Shandong Academy of Medicinal Sciences (Jinan City, Shandong). Our study was conducted according to the protocol guidelines of our institution and approved by the Ethics Committee of Shandong Academy of Medicinal Sciences (Jinan City, Shandong). All participants were adults (over 18 years old) and gave written informed consent and allowed their biological samples to be genetically analyzed.

Study population

Our cohort was composed of 183 adult subjects; 125 were RA (STRA and SFRA) and 58 were OA (STOA and SFOA). The data is displayed in Table 1. Samples from the 183 subjects enrolled in this study were collected and analyzed at Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan Central Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, and Guoyitang Hospital. A full list of sample information is available in Table S1. SF samples were collected aseptically during therapeutic aspiration from knee joints. ST were collected aseptically during joint surgery. Prevention of contamination and identification of controls – After excision, the fresh tissue was immediately placed in 50 ml sterile tubes on ice and homogenized within 10 min of collection, and the synovial fluid was placed in 5 ml sterile tubes on ice and homogenized within 5 min of collection. The negative controls included sample collection controls, reaction mixture controls and environmental control. For the environmental control, a tube filled with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was left open for the duration of the surgical procedure and then processed in parallel with the samples. The whole experiment was strictly conducted in a sterile environment. Each sample was immediately frozen and stored at –135 °C without heparin and without hyaluronidase. Patients were excluded from the study if they had chronic infectious disease history, experienced an infection within 1 month before sampling, or received antibiotic therapy within 2 weeks before sampling.

Table 1.

Demographic information of all subjects used in this study.

Cohort Synovial Fluid Synovial Tissue
n 183 152 31
Cohort
RA 125 110 15
OA 58 42 16
Male: Female 31:152 27:125 4:27
Age 20~80 20~80 22~78
Open in a new tab

Diagnosis of RA was performed by a rheumatologist in accordance with the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology, 201048,49. Diagnosis of OA was performed based on the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee50. No glucocorticoid therapy was performed within 3 months before admission; all patients were in the active period.

DNA extraction and 16S rRNA sequencing

Bacterial genomic DNA extraction was performed with a DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quantitation was performed on a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific). To generate 16S rRNA gene amplicons, 50 ng of DNA was used as a template in a 50-μL reaction, with 0.4 μM of V1-V2 barcoded primers targeting 27F and 355R of the bacterial 16S gene (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′ and 5′-CTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGT-3′). Amplicons were purified with a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). All amplicons were quantified and then pooled to equalize concentrations for sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq.

16S rRNA sequence analysis

The 16S sequence paired-end data set was joined and quality filtered using the FLASH method described by Magoč and Salzberg51. All sequence analysis was performed in the Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME, version 1.9.1) software suite52 according to the Qiime tutorial (http://qiime.org), with some modified methods. Chimeric sequences were removed using usearch61 with denovo models53. Sequences were clustered against the 2013 Greengenes (13_8 release) ribosomal database’s 97% reference data set. Sequences that did not match any entries in this reference were subsequently clustered into de novo OTUs at 97% similarity with UCLUST. Taxonomy was assigned to all OTUs using the RDP classifier54 within QIIME and the Greengenes reference data set. Rarefaction and rank abundance curves were calculated from OTU tables using alpha diversity and rank abundance scripts within the QIIME pipeline. Hierarchical clustering based on population profiles of most common and abundant taxa was performed using UPGMA clustering (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean, also known as average linkage) on the distance matrix of OTU abundance. The resulting newick formatted tree was obtained with the QIIME package.

Cytokine expression

We used an ELISA kit (Anhui Joyee Biotechnics Co. Ltd.) to quantitatively analyze expression of human IL-1α, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-17. An ELISA assay was then performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

To account for any bias caused by uneven sequencing depth, the least number of sequences present in any given sample from a sample category were randomly selected prior to calculating community-wide dissimilarity measures (α-diversity and β-diversity). Diversity analysis was performed using rarefied OTU tables (rarefied to the lowest number of reads obtained for any of the samples analyzed). All PCoA were based on unweighted and weighted UniFrac distances using evenly sampled OTU abundances. Prediction of the functional composition of a metagenome using marker gene data and a database of reference genomes was done with PICRUSt as described by Langille et al.55. Graphical representation of the results was done with R. Wilcox rank sum test was used to calculate P-values. Classification analysis was performed by Support Vector Machine (SVM) with R package e1071. For each classification task, the radial basis function (RBF) was chosen as the kernel function, and the best values of the two parameters, cost (C) and gamma (γ) in the kernel function were obtained by a grid-search approach using cross-validation. Finally, the classification accuracy was evaluated by five-fold cross-validation. The ROC curves as well as the AUC (Area under the Curve) value was calculated using the ROCR R package.

Electronic supplementary material

Dataset 1 (24.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary information (418.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants of this study, which was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 31471202 (Lei Zhang); the Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Program under contract No. 2016YYSP009 (Lei Zhang); the Innovation Project of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province under contract No. ZR2014YL040 (Yan Zhao); City of Weihai Technique Extension Project under contract No. 2016GNS023 (Lei Zhang). Lei Zhang is also supported by the Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province (No. tshw20120206).

Author Contributions

L.Z. conceived the study concept; L.Z. and J.Y. jointly designed and supervised the work; X.H. supervised the clinical setting and recruitment of participants. Y.Z., B.C., S.L., L.Y., D.Z., Y.W., T.W., B.S. and Z.G. recruited the participants and contributed to the sample collection and preparation. Y.Z., B.C., Y.W., H.W. and J.Y. performed the experiments. Y.Z., B.C., H.W. and J.Y. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data. Y.Z. and B.C. generated all figures and tables. Y.Z. and B.C. wrote the first draft of the manuscript; L.Z. and J.Y. critically reviewed and edited the manuscript; all authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Yan Zhao and Bin Chen contributed equally

Contributor Information

Xueyuan Heng, Email: xueyuanheng@yahoo.com.

Junjie Yang, Email: microbiota@foxmail.com.

Lei Zhang, Email: microbiome@foxmail.com.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-32675-w.

References

  • 1.Klareskog L, Padyukov L, Lorentzen J, Alfredsson L. Mechanisms of disease: Genetic susceptibility and environmental triggers in the development of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Clin. Pract. Rheumatol. 2006;2(8):425–433. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Svendsen AJ, et al. On the origin of rheumatoid arthritis: The impact of environment and genes—a population based twin study. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brooks PM. Impact of osteoarthritis on individuals and society: how much disability? Social consequences and health economic implications. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2002;14(5):573–577. doi: 10.1097/00002281-200209000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Felson DT, et al. Risk factors for incident radiographic knee osteoarthritis in the elderly: The Framingham Study. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(4):728–733. doi: 10.1002/art.1780400420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wu HJ, et al. Gut-residing segmented filamentous bacteria drive autoimmune arthritis via T helper 17 cells. Immunity. 2010;32(6):815–827. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bao F, Wu P, Xiao N, Qiu F, Zeng QP. Nitric oxide-driven hypoxia initiates synovial angiogenesis, hyperplasia and inflammatory lesions in mice. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e34494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Scher JU, et al. Periodontal disease and the oral microbiota in new-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(10):3083–3094. doi: 10.1002/art.34539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Scher JU, et al. Expansion of intestinal Prevotella copri correlates with enhanced susceptibility to arthritis. Elife. 2013;2:e01202. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang X, et al. The oral and gut microbiomes are perturbed in rheumatoid arthritis and partly normalized after treatment. Nat. Med. 2015;21(8):895–905. doi: 10.1038/nm.3914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cukrowska B, Kozakova H, Rehakova Z, Sinkora J, Tlaskalova-Hogenova H. Specific antibody and immunoglobulin responses after intestinal colonization of germ-free piglets with non-pathogenic Escherichia coli O86. Immunobiology. 2001;204(4):425–433. doi: 10.1078/0171-2985-00052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shinebaum R, Neumann VC, Cooke EM, Wright V. Comparison of faecal florae in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and controls. Br. J. Rheumatol. 1987;26(5):329–333. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/26.5.329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vaahtovuo J, Munukka E, Korkeamaki M, Luukkainen R, Toivanen P. Fecal microbiota in early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(8):1500–1505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.van der Heijden IM, et al. Presence of bacterial DNA and bacterial peptidoglycans in joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other arthritides. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(3):593–598. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200003)43:3&#x0003c;593::AID-ANR16&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Leadbetter EA, et al. A. Chromatin-IgG complexes activate B cells by dual engagement of IgM and Toll-like receptors. Nature. 2002;416(6881):603–607. doi: 10.1038/416603a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Johnson SM, Bruckner F, Collins D. Distribution of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Mycoplasma salivarium in the synovial fluid of arthritis patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007;45(3):953–957. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01973-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li J, et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis contributes to the development of hypertension. Microbiome. 2017;5(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0222-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pelletier JP, Martel-Pelletier J, Abramson SB. Osteoarthritis, an inflammatory disease: Potential implication for the selection of new therapeutic targets. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(6):1237–1247. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200106)44:6&#x0003c;1237::AID-ART214&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Spector TD, et al. Low-level increases in serum C-reactive protein are present in early osteoarthritis of the knee and predict progressive disease. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(4):723–727. doi: 10.1002/art.1780400419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sharif M, Shepstone L, Elson CJ, Dieppe PA, Kirwan JR. Increased serum C reactive protein may reflect events that precede radiographic progression in osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2000;59(1):71–74. doi: 10.1136/ard.59.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Saxne T, Lindell M, Mansson B, Petersson IF, Heinegard D. Inflammation is a feature of the disease process in early knee joint osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003;42(7):903–904. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Amos N, Lauder S, Evans A, Feldmann M, Bondeson J. Adenoviral gene transfer into osteoarthritis synovial cells using the endogenous inhibitor IkappaBalpha reveals that most, but not all, inflammatory and destructive mediators are NFkappaB dependent. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006;45(10):1201–1209. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Strand V, Kavanaugh AF. The role of interleukin-1 in bone resorption in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(Suppl 3):iii10–iii16. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bingham CO., III. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis: pivotal cytokines involved in bone degradation and inflammation. J. Rheumatol. 2002;29(Suppl 65):3–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Firestein GS. Pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis: how early is early? Arthritis Res. Ther. 2005;7(4):157–159. doi: 10.1186/ar1780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Malaviya AM. Cytokine network and its manipulation in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Assoc. Physicians India. 2006;54(7):15–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Korenek NL, Andrews FM, Maddux JM, Sanders WL, Faulk DL. Determination of total protein concentration and viscosity of synovial fluid from the tibiotarsal joints of horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1992;53(5):781–784. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Haynes MK, Hume EL, Smith JB. Phenotypic characterization of inflammatory cells from osteoarthritic synovium and synovial fluids. Clin. Immunol. 2002;105(3):315–325. doi: 10.1006/clim.2002.5283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Neogi T, Zhang Y. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 2013;39(1):1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gabriel SE. The epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 2001;27(2):269–281. doi: 10.1016/S0889-857X(05)70201-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bresnihan B. Are synovial biopsies of diagnostic value? Arthritis Res. Ther. 2003;5(6):271–278. doi: 10.1186/ar1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Evangelisto A, Wakefield R, Emery P. Imaging in early arthritis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2004;18(6):927–943. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2004.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Baeten D, et al. Comparative study of the synovial histology in rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathy, and osteoarthritis: influence of disease duration and activity. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2000;59(12):945–953. doi: 10.1136/ard.59.12.945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gomez A, et al. Loss of sex and age driven differences in the gut microbiome characterize arthritis-susceptible 0401 mice but not arthritis-resistant 0402 mice. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e36095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Martinez-Martinez RE, et al. Detection of periodontal bacterial DNA in serum and synovial fluid in refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(12):1004–1010. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01496.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ogrendik M. Rheumatoid arthritis is linked to oral bacteria: etiological association. Mod. Rheumatol. 2009;19(5):453–456. doi: 10.3109/s10165-009-0194-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lappin DF, et al. Influence of periodontal disease, Porphyromonas gingivalis and cigarette smoking on systemic anti-citrullinated peptide antibody titres. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2013;40(10):907–915. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu X, et al. Role of the gut microbiome in modulating arthritis progression in mice. Sci. Rep. 2016;68(Suppl 10):30594. doi: 10.1038/srep30594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yamanishi Y, Firestein GS. Pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis: the role of synoviocytes. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 2001;27(2):355–371. doi: 10.1016/S0889-857X(05)70206-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dayer JM. The process of identifying and understanding cytokines: from basic studies to treating rheumatic diseases. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2004;18(1):31–45. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2003.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Catrina AI, et al. Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha therapy (etanercept) down-regulates serum matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-3 and MMP-1 in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002;41(5):484–489. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.5.484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Miossec P. IL-17 in rheumatoid arthritis: a new target for treatment or just another cytokine? Joint Bone Spine. 2004;71(2):87–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2003.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tokuda H, et al. Interleukin (IL)-17 enhances tumor necrosis factor-alpha-stimulated IL-6 synthesis via p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in osteoblasts. J Cell Biochem. 2004;91(5):1053–1061. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Radstake TR, et al. Increased FcgammaRII expression and aberrant tumour necrosis factor alpha production by mature dendritic cells from patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2004;63(12):1556–1563. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.016550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Radstake TR, et al. Increased expression of CCL18, CCL19, and CCL17 by dendritic cells from patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and regulation by Fc gamma receptors. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2005;64(3):359–367. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.017566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Radstake TR, et al. Dendritic cells from patients with rheumatoid arthritis lack the interleukin 13 mediated increase of Fc gamma RII expression, which has clear functional consequences. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2005;64(12):1737–1743. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.034405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bolstad AI, Jensen HB, Bakken V. Taxonomy, biology, and periodontal aspects of Fusobacterium nucleatum. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1996;9(1):55–71. doi: 10.1128/cmr.9.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Martinez-Martinez RE, Abud-Mendoza C, Patino-Marin N, Seymour GJ. Rheumatoid arthritis and the role of oral bacteria. J. Oral Microbiol. 2010;2:1584. doi: 10.3402/jom.v2i0.5784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Aletaha D, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(9):1580–1588. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.138461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Neogi T, et al. The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League.Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Phase 2 methodological report. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2582–2591. doi: 10.1002/art.27580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hochberg MC, et al. American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee [J] Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64(4):465–474. doi: 10.1002/acr.21596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Magoc T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(21):2957–2963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Caporaso JG, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 2010;7(5):335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(19):2460–2461. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cole JR, et al. The Ribosomal Database Project: Improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Database issue):D141–145. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Langille MG, et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013;31(9):814–821. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Dataset 1 (24.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary information (418.7KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES